From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 05:21:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11A6E1B5DE for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 05:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF6ED82ABF for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 05:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v835LP0i007239 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 05:21:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213814] AWS/EC2: no egress traffic stats on ixv(4) xn(4) Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 05:21:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: a.andersson.thn@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 05:21:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213814 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Andersson --- This still does not work. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 4 00:48:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FDCE04804 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 00:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepherosa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F40827E0; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 00:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepherosa@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w42so17713600qtg.5; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:48:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Qe/v48M54ljX9bq3fpyEtrIOl9zKwTIEYeCHLATX+AU=; b=Bv/tU1TtGUNoMjCDROSLIbSqLBYR1IfpqFXTM6ECsoTDqhCYrDemMeVnKd4yQMekPo Antkd2lA6Xmy0nDfInUzebQpouO61GjsIzJTbdrgZ0OwrkiW0eYHu0F/mv3Ilw5iiM3N 5yVTGz6kzkC4EcrNc7CsJ8Ke8JW98lqgv3aznFsghTD1/4veBkNsY9yFyATzifC/13Fy v9MSsPkNKy71t5TRf6daK+T9hpIrumlLG5grOTP0n26pO3UmjUmSRRAvXNzzKjM5kYO6 IrOE++PH7BZsWLtqUbpojy1tbaQQRQdfXTgJTmColvHP0ZZV5+bDauV0Nv1DjCmhD2j2 JAlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qe/v48M54ljX9bq3fpyEtrIOl9zKwTIEYeCHLATX+AU=; b=DNWtImwygOqUYPCy/bHzEShVGWHx3Pf9NaW2YQAEKpbLoNogAOMYDfkU1FuXMC/YlE A8v8zQHkxmWbOrv6fGqWjoyEo9KdeYnHNOdKbbmrxUgd1AdzvD1CrN3e/wvq6jaWRmvw XVdzEHM8UI2TGQyL2JvBvacofMLT+cVYz1dnYH4rGYVIWj2EJ1hyMubxwGTwwtKGhNhq 6zGr6FAUVizQXyWqhX4Dps5dTfB7UTdXraj9W5kvuJo/UGWPMMRSHhRFa/pBo3ALAkil knoXhEQuyXprlNHnAqoysDbErH5XRk0XSVkquel3p1+w+gjG+R5pKhFeIpkOL/D/3PiG qSVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhKHXyLqkqc+91/zLDCyTI6wA6vobAK4aVFLH7qbk3faaN0YQBu fOf4Ad5sun+JmjFALDGBQ86RM4XDZw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb51aSeqerWvG+Z5EefDdRpXIDVu1ELSl0Amt54ejessBfmRrbJOk2tas2+cdmFDLJ76fI02UT8EtuNoVDo+/OQ= X-Received: by 10.200.24.214 with SMTP id o22mr12580560qtk.56.1504486081667; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:48:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.106.102 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sepherosa Ziehau Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 08:48:01 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RSS_UDP_IPV4_EX? To: "Robert N. M. Watson" Cc: Adrian Chadd , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:48:03 -0000 On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: > My recollection here is (quite) hazy, as it's been a while, but it's likely > that this was a transcription error. The set of hash types was largely > modelled on what Chelsio offered in the T3 (if I recall), and also what was > documented in the Microsoft RSS white paper, so it may be worth taking a > look at those sources to see if something makes itself obvious. > > (There do seem to be some odd variations in hashing types supported by > various NICs -- e.g., hashing but with different hash algorithms in certain > generations of cards, etc, so it also wouldn't surprise me if it did > correspond to something real. Clearly the comment is not good enough to > explain that, if so!) I checked latest RSS updates from Microsoft. There is no such type. But they did add UDP_IP4, UDP_IPV6 and UDP_IPV6_EX. I am going to whack UDP_IPV4_EX and update various comment. I will setup a review soon. Thanks, sephe > > Robert > > On 2 Sep 2017, at 00:43, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi, > > I seem to recall it was something some chipsets supported? I forget the > details. > > > > -adrian > > > On 30 August 2017 at 00:07, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: >> >> IPv4 UDP with extended headers o_O? Or it was just a mistake. >> >> Thanks, >> sephe >> >> -- >> Tomorrow Will Never Die > > > -- Tomorrow Will Never Die From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 4 05:43:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE549E159DE for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 05:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales1@4bettercare.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DE4662F6 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 05:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales1@4bettercare.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B0E25E159DD; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 05:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0614E159DC for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 05:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales1@4bettercare.com) Received: from smtphy.263.net (ca-mx01.263.net [50.18.194.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtpcom.263xmail.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 International Server CA - G3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D71662F5 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 05:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales1@4bettercare.com) Received: from transport.263xmail.com (unknown [38.83.106.156]) by smtphy.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9AD120502 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:43:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from lucky1.263xmail.com (unknown [192.168.165.121]) by transportlucky.263xmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF55A329 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:43:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from sales1?4bettercare.com (unknown [192.168.167.225]) by lucky1.263xmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9971A23 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:43:05 +0800 (CST) X-263anti-spam: KSV:0;BIG:0;Original-ABS:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 0 X-ANTISPAM-LEVEL: 2 Received: from smtp.4bettercare.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C4FAF3C4 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:43:05 +0800 (CST) X-RL-SENDER: sales1@4bettercare.com X-FST-TO: net@freebsd.org X-SENDER-IP: 120.33.232.90 X-LOGIN-NAME: sales1@4bettercare.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <8d7272794276eb2443f4b951225471c8> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-SENDER: sales1@4bettercare.com X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Received: from smtp.4bettercare.com (unknown [120.33.232.90]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) whith ESMTP id 25491PVXL52; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:43:05 +0800 (CST) X-Sender: "sales1@4bettercare.com" X-Receiver: net@freebsd.org yayunid: ya636401293802625970yun MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "sales1@4bettercare.com" To: net@freebsd.org Reply-To: sales1@4bettercare.com Date: 4 Sep 2017 13:43:00 +0800 Subject: RE:baby/adult/pet diaper&nappy,under pads,pull-ups,sanitary napkins&baby wipes/cardinal Message-Id: <20170904054305.C4FAF3C4@smtp.263.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 05:43:27 -0000 SGkgZnJpZW5kCgoKCQoKCgkKCQlTbyBnbGFkIHRvIGxlYXJuICB0aGF0IHlvdSBhcmUg bWFya2V0IG9uIGJhYnkvYWR1bHQvcGV0IGRpYXBlcnMmYW1wO25hcHB5cyxtZWRpY2Fs IG51cnNpbmcgcGFkcyxzYW5pdGFyeSBuYXBraW5zIGFuZCBiYWJ5IHdpcGVzLgoJCgkK CQlXZSxGdWppYW4gTGljaGVuZyBQYXBlciBDby4sIEx0ZC4gaXMgb25lIG9mIHRoZSBi aWdnZXN0IGZhY3RvcnkgaW4gQ2hpbmEgd2hpY2ggc3BlY2lhbGl6ZSBpbiB0aGlzIGZp ZWxkIGFuZCBvZW0gZm9yICBtYW55IG1hbnkgYmlnIGJyYW5kIHN1cHBsaWVycyBhcyB3 ZWxsLgoJCgkKCQlBbGwgb3VyIHByb2R1Y3RzIGhhdmUgQ0UvSVNPL0ZEQSBhcHByb3Zl ZC5Ob3cgd2UgdHJ5IHRvIGZpbmQgYSB3YXkgdG8gY29vcGVyYXRlIHdpdGggeW91LgoJ CgkKCQkgCgkKCQoJCVByaWNlbGlzdCBhbmQgdGVzdCBzYW1wbGVzIGNhbiBiZSBzZW50 IG9uIHJlcXVlc3QuUmVhbGx5IGFwcHJlY2lhdGUgeW91ciByZXBseS4KCQoJCgkJIAoJ CgkKCQlZb3VyIHNpbmNlcmVseQoJCgkKCQlCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsCgkKCQoJCUxlbw== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 4 05:54:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83540E15F34 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 05:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales1@4bettercare.com) Received: from smtphy.263.net (ca-mx01.263.net [50.18.194.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtpcom.263xmail.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 International Server CA - G3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B814666E0 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 05:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales1@4bettercare.com) Received: from transport.263xmail.com (unknown [38.83.106.156]) by smtphy.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DACB1205A3 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:54:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from lucky1.263xmail.com (unknown [192.168.165.180]) by transportlucky.263xmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7656A028 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:54:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from sales1?4bettercare.com (unknown [192.168.167.160]) by lucky1.263xmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35438F2E7 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:54:02 +0800 (CST) X-263anti-spam: KSV:0;BIG:0;Original-ABS:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 0 X-ANTISPAM-LEVEL: 2 Received: from smtp.4bettercare.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9AE6E3C4 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:54:01 +0800 (CST) X-RL-SENDER: sales1@4bettercare.com X-FST-TO: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-SENDER-IP: 120.33.232.90 X-LOGIN-NAME: sales1@4bettercare.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <88712c92c3b4b40cfa966140098d1939> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-SENDER: sales1@4bettercare.com X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Received: from smtp.4bettercare.com (unknown [120.33.232.90]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) whith ESMTP id 2084KCZBEU; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:54:01 +0800 (CST) X-Sender: "sales1@4bettercare.com" X-Receiver: freebsd-net@freebsd.org yayunid: ya636401300365751359yun MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "sales1@4bettercare.com" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-To: sales1@4bettercare.com Date: 4 Sep 2017 13:53:57 +0800 Subject: RE:baby/adult/pet diaper&nappy,under pads,pull-ups,sanitary napkins&baby wipes/cardinal Message-Id: <20170904055401.9AE6E3C4@smtp.263.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 05:54:16 -0000 SGkgZnJpZW5kCgoKCQoKCgkKCQlTbyBnbGFkIHRvIGxlYXJuICB0aGF0IHlvdSBhcmUg bWFya2V0IG9uIGJhYnkvYWR1bHQvcGV0IGRpYXBlcnMmYW1wO25hcHB5cyxtZWRpY2Fs IG51cnNpbmcgcGFkcyxzYW5pdGFyeSBuYXBraW5zIGFuZCBiYWJ5IHdpcGVzLgoJCgkK CQlXZSxGdWppYW4gTGljaGVuZyBQYXBlciBDby4sIEx0ZC4gaXMgb25lIG9mIHRoZSBi aWdnZXN0IGZhY3RvcnkgaW4gQ2hpbmEgd2hpY2ggc3BlY2lhbGl6ZSBpbiB0aGlzIGZp ZWxkIGFuZCBvZW0gZm9yICBtYW55IG1hbnkgYmlnIGJyYW5kIHN1cHBsaWVycyBhcyB3 ZWxsLgoJCgkKCQlBbGwgb3VyIHByb2R1Y3RzIGhhdmUgQ0UvSVNPL0ZEQSBhcHByb3Zl ZC5Ob3cgd2UgdHJ5IHRvIGZpbmQgYSB3YXkgdG8gY29vcGVyYXRlIHdpdGggeW91LgoJ CgkKCQkgCgkKCQoJCVByaWNlbGlzdCBhbmQgdGVzdCBzYW1wbGVzIGNhbiBiZSBzZW50 IG9uIHJlcXVlc3QuUmVhbGx5IGFwcHJlY2lhdGUgeW91ciByZXBseS4KCQoJCgkJIAoJ CgkKCQlZb3VyIHNpbmNlcmVseQoJCgkKCQlCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsCgkKCQoJCUxlbw== From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 4 13:42:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B913BE081FC for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F687424B for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v84DgMO2002961 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:42:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208205] re0 watchdog timeout Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:42:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zjk7@wp.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:42:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208205 zjk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zjk7@wp.pl --- Comment #16 from zjk --- The problem still exists in version 11.1. Low load - "re" works fine, but large bidirectional - completely hangs the network. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166724 Is there a chance to renew the topic? zjk --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 22:26:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC808E225E2 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E247EAD4; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id w204so17032958ywg.3; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:26:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=KOqNl+q+l8hvdASilcCYf0sNjd7wewWS4nuR+hUoQ9Q=; b=lOEgx82QiAAc7NMe7R+vhbBBZ12nfQottfBf9Gtl9ubzuqwtnNl9x+ID5cpeF2f0vc JwE1F0YPwYaOm+XLVN9j3Z3ZDLmmCbI2hF4pJgudeUfiTmkh5giakiQqq9AlCRe4+hvo oFkmtQSByEdHiV8039YwQjJPkIQPkMxjFTT4RhdxVgaUSLUIBwTJXtxJfs0nbEkVjESE AFg5Lg5lNJIOisEZ0q9mrBZsLpy8WZ9Z4Cl+QlSxTm58RcuL9jf52LttLNc6Uoe3jNns yLKaaBOx+vju0Vj+ctOMns1Ze6YtsSzHKzFNfsqmi4GmlrBpOw/W8z4PEq9hziueFPOE jaaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KOqNl+q+l8hvdASilcCYf0sNjd7wewWS4nuR+hUoQ9Q=; b=ncGgZhEr6mPP//p8oRMiNermzv6QN8Sy/7bNCPvn74p3+Yot3ej7WWXZODohX+fBue 9mzZT4N4KlVxy6MyHv397dYzIdu1Mt2vepsujMrKfAqjmvMtN1AQ76E5xPj9NcN2Ct5t RtNmGMIoZ0k7DDa3ZemmBpCXSPQEDLKP9Laz5wyMnQJ7T4QrKXBb1Hs1Pgx27ZMvTvAK pl+Y217MCyPaerxYwS5TCsfEJ1ZCFzJAFl//0ezD7IRpeeEHxWuuxjKtoTEi2sja/AEI 5poqcku+yx3Odh6cBvVX19Bjczx9ZKqZ9di1jLTeBNL7rAVpvXshBBlja3OA3GmqO8z6 Z+eA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUin61+h0efrvL0Px6xxEz2+Vulu++TRnSaaseh30+u8qflCtTaG ns0UmHMSbC57TgvGtlFLKwjXR+4SAw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6VjDemKlHhKsVG5lIuqBg76FRPQ683Iv9GEyYhqP/sDKJq4pEe2ccNZT4IvbCf+QJ3F5X2RBsxvkJfd1wdgsc= X-Received: by 10.37.206.204 with SMTP id x195mr481183ybe.33.1504650407603; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:26:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.129.125.65 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:26:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adrian Chadd Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:26:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ATFx9DedVLTRLLYN7XsWkbfLsc0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RSS_UDP_IPV4_EX? To: Sepherosa Ziehau Cc: "Robert N. M. Watson" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:26:50 -0000 Please do! -a On 3 September 2017 at 17:48, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >> My recollection here is (quite) hazy, as it's been a while, but it's likely >> that this was a transcription error. The set of hash types was largely >> modelled on what Chelsio offered in the T3 (if I recall), and also what was >> documented in the Microsoft RSS white paper, so it may be worth taking a >> look at those sources to see if something makes itself obvious. >> >> (There do seem to be some odd variations in hashing types supported by >> various NICs -- e.g., hashing but with different hash algorithms in certain >> generations of cards, etc, so it also wouldn't surprise me if it did >> correspond to something real. Clearly the comment is not good enough to >> explain that, if so!) > > I checked latest RSS updates from Microsoft. There is no such type. > But they did add UDP_IP4, UDP_IPV6 and UDP_IPV6_EX. I am going to > whack UDP_IPV4_EX and update various comment. I will setup a review > soon. > > Thanks, > sephe > >> >> Robert >> >> On 2 Sep 2017, at 00:43, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I seem to recall it was something some chipsets supported? I forget the >> details. >> >> >> >> -adrian >> >> >> On 30 August 2017 at 00:07, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: >>> >>> IPv4 UDP with extended headers o_O? Or it was just a mistake. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> sephe >>> >>> -- >>> Tomorrow Will Never Die >> >> >> > > > > -- > Tomorrow Will Never Die From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 17:33:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FCCE0DC31 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 436EE71C4E for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86HXY4l043911 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:33:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221845] bridge0 causes kernel panic on BBB using usb wifi in hostap mode (RT3071) Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:33:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: russ.haley@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:33:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221845 --- Comment #1 from Russell Haley --- Original post on freebsd-arm@ that spurred my investigation. Complete conversation here: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/Beaglebone-Black-FreeBSD-USB-WiFi-WAP-= td6201439.html Is anyone using a BeagleBone Black and USB Wifi as a WAP? If so, what kind= of throughput do you get on your Wifi? I=E2=80=99m getting very bad network p= erformance. Hardware: - BeagleBone Black rev C. - Tried with two different USB Wifi Adapters: - Edimax N150 (small nub type adapter) - LB Link from Adafruit (https://www.adafruit.com/product/1030) - Both show as RTL8188CUS chips (via dmesg) - Wired connection connected for access to my network and internet OS: - Mostly with the most recent Beaglebone Snapshot of 11.0 - A few quick tests with the 11. snapshot image Connection Speeds: - Using nuttcp (over 100Mbps ethernet) between the BB and another machine, I can get ~90+ Mbps in each direction so I don=E2=80=99t think there is an i= ssue with that part of the connection. - Using the BB as a WAP and connection my iPad I see 1 to 5 Mbps down and <= 1 Mbps tested via the Ookla Speedtest app. - Connecting to my ancient Netgear WAP using the same app and test, I get roughly 10 Mbps in either direction with the same test. Configs (pretty much taken right from the handbook): /boot/loader.conf: if_urtwn_load=3D"YES" wlan_mac_load=3D"YES" /etc/rc.conf (relevant parts) ifconfig_cpsw0=3D"inet XX.XX.XX.XX netmask 0xffffff00=E2=80=9D defaultrouter=3D=E2=80=9CYY.YY.YY.YY" hostapd_enable=3D"YES" wlans_urtwn0=3D"wlan0" create_args_wlan0=3D"wlanmode hostap" ifconfig_wlan0=3D"up" cloned_interfaces=3D"bridge0" ifconfig_bridge0=3D"addm cpsw0 addm wlan0 up=E2=80=9D /etc/hostapd.conf interface=3Dwlan0 debug=3D1 ctrl_interface=3D/var/run/hostapd ctrl_interface_group=3Dwheel ssid=3DREDACTED wpa=3D2 wpa_passphrase=3DREDACTED wpa_key_mgmt=3DWPA-PSK wpa_pairwise=3DCCMP Any ideas? Is this just the limit of USB wifi on this board? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 17:36:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7504E0DE0F for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9484F723F5 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86Ha1kS047399 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:36:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221845] bridge0 causes kernel panic on BBB using usb wifi in hostap mode (RT3071) Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:36:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: russ.haley@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:36:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221845 --- Comment #2 from Russell Haley --- I've been digging into the code for if_bridge.c, which is found under sys/net. bridge_broadcast only has one call to m_dup on line 2553. mc =3D m_dup(m, M_NOWAIT); if (mc =3D=3D NULL) { if_inc_counter(sc->sc_ifp, IFCOUNTER_OERRORS, 1); continue; } This is just a guess: I'm wondering if the M_NOWAIT is causing the panic because... er... "someone has a sleep lock they shouldn't"? I don't really know what I'm talking about though (a little bit of knowledge...). I guess I'd have to try and correlate to some sort of lock begin held in the adapter specific code? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 07:01:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE98E0C11C for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 761E881599 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v8771GxJ059376 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:01:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221845] bridge0 causes kernel panic on BBB using usb wifi in hostap mode (RT3071) Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 07:01:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: russ.haley@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 07:01:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221845 --- Comment #3 from Russell Haley --- I've been following the code through and wound up at sys/arm/ti/cpsw/if_cps= w.c. cpsw_intr_rx is defined on line 1554. The function uses a macro called CPSW_RX_LOCK which is defined on line 349. The macro contains an assert on a transmit lock (tx.lock). I theorise the statement on line 350 is causing my exception? I also wonder if the lock being held between lines 1561 and 1570= is causing the delay in the bridge interface that is causing the original post= ers' slow throughput. Is it necessary to hold the lock until after the cpsw_writ= e_4 on line 1569 or could it be performed outside the lock? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 15:28:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68370E22AF5; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien.charbon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE13669241; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien.charbon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id r10so1111663wmf.1; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:28:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fCwFZtBtV8puzrgJsf/Ff+CwOjYExRIeBcA/j4Nn1Y8=; b=ekyZi0uR1c24BXQ9j4cgMwmUCQI+5iGAeFuQwGRiv53rkO9Z3cmUTYi3l+v+58fKzi aMC1mlOsvWNodMg1M0D0tTcjejcPwmsV07ym6rNlGauiJqrd5alsly7Y97oBVy86r0ud pOyFAk/ukPlTeyMrISreCqDFaU0NzrR0HYHG6FwTVL9WFGl+t7/wTKkzEZp52Dhn508u 0OJ8ModSEhVhKqqZjWBZZdsXC9OUW7ql8bzxqaGWYpgQPy991IGT+gSSeN3zyrcy8K4x 8mzZjawiHu3FZ9546/R+R4dGOYUbVtGQyF42TovNwI/ZYRptbbBCkEOcnpFwe1347H7Q 09ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUi3u+HWZJi39Z9Lf5iEodJh/TlHcsIYgP17hWUvwBb9dECBPv0Y qOeD32Xwq95O4tcZJrA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCNlpAFFoDEZjffIL1wOLyNMEeBxzYyGGDbEnRFTFKc/+QIkrMIlrOaCgoUFSeZqXRGD4zfdg== X-Received: by 10.28.131.197 with SMTP id f188mr795787wmd.71.1504797746215; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.100.64.46] ([217.30.88.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 29sm4615163wrz.77.2017.09.07.08.22.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: mlx4en, timer irq @100%... (11.0 stuck on high network load ???) To: Ben RUBSON Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , FreeBSD Net , hiren , Slawa Olhovchenkov , FreeBSD Stable References: <4C91C6E5-0725-42E7-9813-1F3ACF3DDD6E@gmail.com> <5840c25e-7472-3276-6df9-1ed4183078ad@selasky.org> <2ADA8C57-2C2D-4F97-9F0B-82D53EDDC649@gmail.com> <061cdf72-6285-8239-5380-58d9d19a1ef7@selasky.org> <92BEE83D-498F-47D5-A53C-39DCDC00A0FD@gmail.com> <5d8960d8-e1ff-8719-320f-d3ae84054714@selasky.org> <6B4A35F7-5694-4945-9575-19ADB678F9FA@gmail.com> <297a784a-3d80-b1a6-652e-a78621fe5a8b@selasky.org> <3ECCFBF1-18D9-4E33-8F39-0C366C3BB8B4@gmail.com> <0a5787c5-8a53-ab09-971a-dc1cd5f3aca0@freebsd.org> <645f2ee3-3eaa-660e-2a64-37d53e88322f@freebsd.org> <13DE4E6D-CE83-4B5D-BF88-0EFE65111311@gmail.com> <7B084207-062A-4529-B0DC-5BFEB6517780@gmail.com> <82e661b4-1bac-ff5b-f776-8dba44cac15e@freebsd.org> <82EFBD5E-8FC2-4156-A030-AF70D97A37BA@gmail.com> From: Julien Charbon Message-ID: <25938f82-a32e-e014-8a98-4f9452dca9b5@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:22:19 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <82EFBD5E-8FC2-4156-A030-AF70D97A37BA@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:28:32 -0000 Hi Ben, On 8/31/17 12:04 PM, Ben RUBSON wrote: >> On 28 Aug 2017, at 11:27, Julien Charbon wrote: >> >> On 8/28/17 10:25 AM, Ben RUBSON wrote: >>>> On 16 Aug 2017, at 11:02, Ben RUBSON wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 15 Aug 2017, at 23:33, Julien Charbon wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 8/11/17 11:32 AM, Ben RUBSON wrote: >>>>>>> On 08 Aug 2017, at 13:33, Julien Charbon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 8/8/17 10:31 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Suggested fix attached. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree we your conclusion. Just for the record, more precisely this >>>>>>> regression seems to have been introduced with: >>>>>>> (...) >>>>>>> Thus good catch, and your patch looks good. I am going to just verify >>>>>>> the other in_pcbrele_wlocked() calls in TCP stack. >>>>>> >>>>>> Julien, do you plan to make this fix reach 11.0-p12 ? >>>>> >>>>> I am checking if your issue is another flavor of the issue fixed by: >>>>> >>>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=307551 >>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8211 >>>>> >>>>> This fix in not in 11.0 but in 11.1. Currently I did not found how an >>>>> inp in INP_TIMEWAIT state can have been INP_FREED without having its tw >>>>> set to NULL already except the issue fixed by r307551. >>>>> >>>>> Thus could you try to apply this patch: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/acb5bfda99b753d9ead3529d04f20087c5f7d0a0.patch >>>>> >>>>> and see if you can still reproduce this issue? >>>> >>>> Thank you for your answer Julien. >>>> Unfortunately, I'm not sure at all how to reproduce the issue. >>>> I have other servers which are 100% identical to this one, same workload, >>>> same some-months uptime, but they did not trigger the bug yet. >>>> >>>> If other network stack experts (I'm not) agree with your analysis, >>>> we could then certainly go further with D8211 / r307551. >>>> >>>> One thing that perhaps might help : >>>> # netstat -an | grep TIME_WAIT$ | wc -l >>>> 468 >>>> >>>> Note that due to this running bug, sendmail has lots of difficulties to send outgoing mails. >>>> As soon as I run the above netstat command, I receive a lot of stacked mails (more than 20 this time). >>>> As if netstat was able to somehow help... >>>> >>>> Number of TIME_WAIT connections however does not decrease, but increases. >>>> >>>>> And in the spirit of r307551 fix and based on Hans patch I will also >>>>> propose to add a kernel log describing the issue instead of starting an >>>>> infinite loop when INVARIANT is not set. >>>> >>>> Which should then never be triggered :) >>>> Good idea I think ! >>> >>> What about : >>> D8211/r307551 >>> + Hans' patch >>> + Julien's idea of a kernel log (sort of "We should not be here but we are") >> >> I did this change and I am testing it > > Good news ! > >> on your side did you try this patch applied on 11.0? >> >> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/acb5bfda99b753d9ead3529d04f20087c5f7d0a0.patch > > Yes, patch applied and running correctly, > however hard to say whether or not it solves this issue, > as there is no easy way to reproduce it. No problem, it is just a matter of not seeing the issue anymore during a long enough period. I created a review that includes Hans's patch and uses the same log(LOG_ERR) logic than r307551: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12267 On my side, TCP smoke tests are ok. And I am going to launch our TCP QA on it while receiving review comments. > Mail sent to FreeBSD Security Team ! > > Many thanks, let's stay tuned ! Thanks to you and Hans for reporting that issue. And in summary: - Applying r307551 on top of 11.0 should prevent this case to happen - D12267 will prevent the tcp_tw_2msl_scan() infinite loop while reporting the error, in case a regression defeating r307551 is introduced Thanks. -- Julien From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 14:21:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AD0E19291 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 14:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72A36AB74 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 14:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89EL2FK061406 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 14:21:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211062] [ixv] sr-iov virtual function driver fails to attach Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 14:21:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rahudev2@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 14:21:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211062 rahu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rahudev2@hotmail.com --- Comment #5 from rahu --- If the card you hand over is usable (either on a foundation or on the table= au), you might do so. If not, include it to a face-up dispose of stack. https://solitaire-klondike.net --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 16:48:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF9BE20E6E for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 16:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584326F700 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 16:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89GmavP075096 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 16:48:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222160] Lack of TCP/UDP checksum recalculation in IPSec implementation Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 16:48:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 16:48:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222160 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 18:34:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4E0E013B0 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 18:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD2872E66 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 18:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89IY7Io095469 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 18:34:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222160] Lack of TCP/UDP checksum recalculation in IPSec implementation Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 18:34:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 18:34:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222160 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eugen@freebsd.org Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |ae@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Eugene Grosbein --- Andrey may have something to say on this topic. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 19:37:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA96AE04D26 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B855B755DC for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89JbWkM059975 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:37:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 165174] [patch] [tap] allow tap(4) to keep its address on close Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:37:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:37:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D165174 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED CC| |eugen@freebsd.org Status|In Progress |Closed --- Comment #3 from Eugene Grosbein --- These days tap(4) has IFF_LINK0 flag to keep interface up on close, so one = can just use following in /etc/rc.conf: ifconfig_tap0=3D"inet 192.168.0.1/29 link0" --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 19:44:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A123E0553C for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8820E75D89 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89Ji06b077123 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:44:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:44:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:44:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eugen@freebsd.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed --- Comment #30 from Eugene Grosbein --- Fixed with introduction of loader r/o tunnable flag net.link.log_promisc_mode_change --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=