Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:27:40 +0900 From: "George Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: "Miroslav Lachman" <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: "Slawa Olhovchenkov" <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux Message-ID: <7B8DED16-F794-495D-AAE4-61CC386A962E@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <58BE799B.6080002@quip.cz> References: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz> <20170307071018.GP15630@zxy.spb.ru> <58BE799B.6080002@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 Mar 2017, at 18:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 2017/03/07 08:10: >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:14:44AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> >>> There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions >>> of >>> Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived >>> connections. >>> FreeBSD is the worst in this test. >>> >>> https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html >>> >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png >>> >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf >> >> Is this you test? > > No, it is not mine test. I just found it on the internet. > The work was presented at the latest AsiaBSDCon and several of us are working the sephe@, who is a FreeBSD committer on improving the benchmark's fidelity as well as addressing the issues that are highlighted. Look for P05C: 10 Years with DragonFlyBSD network stack https://2017.asiabsdcon.org/program.html.en# Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7B8DED16-F794-495D-AAE4-61CC386A962E>