From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 28 01:53:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8196D8580C for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 01:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987C113BB; Sun, 28 May 2017 01:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B57B3F5E9; Sat, 27 May 2017 21:53:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias.dhcp.nue.suse.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 565CE3F5E3; Sat, 27 May 2017 21:53:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 03:53:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: David Naylor , Thomas Mueller cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which wine do I need? In-Reply-To: <1950141.VWTixaZMzu@dragon.local> Message-ID: References: <5E.31.29375.7D6E8195@dnvrco-omsmta02> <1950141.VWTixaZMzu@dragon.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 01:53:42 -0000 On Mon, 15 May 2017, David Naylor wrote: >> I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for >> amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. > - On an i386 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine. > - On an amd64 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/i386-wine. > - On an amd64 environment with 64-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine. What do you guys think about the following patch for emulators/wine to help clarify this? Gerald Index: pkg-descr =================================================================== --- pkg-descr (revision 441876) +++ pkg-descr (working copy) @@ -5,8 +5,12 @@ a similar look and feel to other applications on your desktop. Many applications already work, more or less, including versions of -Microsoft Office and several games. +Microsoft Office and many games. +Use this port for 32-bit Windows binaries in an i386 environment or +64-bit Windows binaries in an amd64 environment; use lang/i386-wine +for 32-bit Windows binaries in an amd64 environment. + WWW: http://www.winehq.org/ Gerald Pfeifer From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 28 17:06:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCB5D850CD for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED58F1B28 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E9CB3D850CC; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E965DD850CB for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCAAB1B27 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4SH65ma079983 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:05 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4SH65Wj079982; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:05 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201705281706.v4SH65Wj079982@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:05 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 17:06:06 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/minitube | 2.6 | 2.7 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 28 17:28:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89BCD85A48 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x236.google.com (mail-pf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB6F1B18 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id e193so38015049pfh.0 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 10:28:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6vSrvcmbOeqqlAEdnJOBhlwplJL0hYf3XSiktfwEn7s=; b=qhIoiLotRUGobQsKMr755fyRhJukmCmdxE8uUUSTpBJcx6uhVX2W1GpA2ypWVKsk6n 0PEiNXeFEYzyidVJYvBjpAL8MNEic3LUC+NCW4xsGwfHiTj7SPDTpPrajyl0/2zFQ43W 4Y67HRrci2Pkl1gNFcftJUqxEdgvMg+ON+r6fqNAI0CO1F5/MTJsNraHOngwn9xyHeMo 9aD+CuOFHIxUzOAWj4x0vCPw+U+B5s4TbIfwX4zpn/tccKHCkZg0/iEDUdOZ6vaRQI3p Nkjz/WRk0+ajFCxoRZGwtsDF18eNq1Q6/a7QKgw0dnUQDg6J6GUhT97frlH4nGGNkpkB dS9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6vSrvcmbOeqqlAEdnJOBhlwplJL0hYf3XSiktfwEn7s=; b=MwYhV3veqiv5JUfhf3R1h/EFJTyXryhoj24xiI+pmmu0xfH6xkZ5MRWhJdyQ7BZbj1 2Qk31ezTpmZzV2RQ+PVkTQFOi2sJ6b9W5vKg36WA43RVuszV4h6JTe2pk1iMhcsLEk4N N9MSCOCZk5iWvg3JLJOrSEfou1iKGHBk9hG0wNFN73mLWVBSmGXSmbxp6+GMwVlpAWkP KIpWM8tvSqXvUdA6hoUvsExtvoYUD71MiRcc/EImgrpWroQQmCTDlQdRghGs0HuXM1Xa PXwZkzUvJL6aXtDDSX5pdJ/vX2zSoJlGEXDRNuXqaNi1z1MLoXIGyeIDtjc7e+s3Uf8B +TkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBdynf6iqjUyfF2vltCl9RUU7JqXmagr+d4SKY2x+MnB8s1OlzQ cooewrB51RE1UE+8dAFO60qGsZFEYuDk X-Received: by 10.99.126.67 with SMTP id o3mr14223462pgn.36.1495992537783; Sun, 28 May 2017 10:28:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.168.79 with HTTP; Sun, 28 May 2017 10:28:57 -0700 (PDT) From: blubee blubeeme Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 01:28:57 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: firefox/ rust failed to install on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 17:28:58 -0000 I'm trying to install firefox on FreeBSD FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r318998: Sun May 28 04:38:22 CST 2017 /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 ===> firefox-i18n-53.0.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox - not found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: nspr>=4.13.1 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: nss>=3.29.5 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libevent>=2.0.21_2 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: harfbuzz>=1.4.1 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: graphite2>=1.3.8 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: png>=1.6.28 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libvorbis>=1.3.5,3 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libvpx>=1.5.0 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: sqlite3>=3.17.0 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: py27-sqlite3>0 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: v4l_compat>0 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: autoconf-2.13 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: yasm - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: zip - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: gtk3>=3.14.6 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libnotify>0 - found ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: rustc - not found ===> Building for rust-1.17.0 gmake[7]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src' "/usr/local/bin/python2.7" /usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py build -v info: looks like you are running this command under `sudo` and so in order to preserve your $HOME this will now use vendored sources by default. Note that if this does not work you should run a normal build first before running a command like `sudo make install` extracting /usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src/build/cache/ 2017-03-11/rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ 64-unknown-freebsd extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ 64-unknown-freebsd/lib extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ 64-unknown-freebsd/manifest.in extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd/lib extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd/lib/GNUSparseFile.0/ librustc_llvm-74a1be1110b5d4d0.so gmake[7]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src' *** Error code 1 Stop. make[6]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/rust *** Error code 1 Stop. make[5]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/rust *** Error code 1 Stop. make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n I am getting build failures with or without make_build_unsafe flags. I am building from source and ports tree is updated to revision 441919. Best, Owen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 28 17:51:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F607D8606A for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3D0179B for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8A9E0D86069; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A201D86068; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 568E3179A; Sun, 28 May 2017 17:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dF2Lj-0007Tq-NS; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:51:32 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, "bob prohaska" Subject: Re: libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so References: <20170527164437.GA47374@www.zefox.net> Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:51:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170527164437.GA47374@www.zefox.net> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Scan-Signature: 919fae14bc17c74543a025539baad412 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 17:51:45 -0000 On Sat, 27 May 2017 18:44:37 +0200, bob prohaska wrote: > On an RPI2 www/epiphany finally compiled using portmaster. When started > it runs (somewhat) but reports > > libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so > > Web searches suggest it's something to do with an Nvidia driver, which > seems inapplicable to an RPI2. > > Is there a workaround? /usr/ports are at 441746, /usr/src is at 318674. > > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska AFAIK swrast is the Software Raster driver. So I don't think the link is with NVidia in your case. I had the same error on my laptop with a Radeon driver (r600_dri.so) a while back, but don't see it anymore when I start a GL program. What I remember in my case the error was harmless. The driver was already loaded or something like that. Do you experience actual errors or only the message, i.e. does the program run as expected? I run the latest packages on amd64, but your ports tree is also quite up-to-date as far as I see. Ronald. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 28 19:09:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7657CD851C5 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F03190F for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 62430D851C4; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFE0D851C3; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE57190C; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v4SJ9s0B051542 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 May 2017 12:09:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4SJ9rGe051541; Sun, 28 May 2017 12:09:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 12:09:53 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Ronald Klop Cc: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so Message-ID: <20170528190953.GA51493@www.zefox.net> References: <20170527164437.GA47374@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:09:59 -0000 On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 07:51:31PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Sat, 27 May 2017 18:44:37 +0200, bob prohaska > wrote: > > > On an RPI2 www/epiphany finally compiled using portmaster. When started > > it runs (somewhat) but reports > > > > libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so > > > > AFAIK swrast is the Software Raster driver. So I don't think the link is > with NVidia in your case. > I had the same error on my laptop with a Radeon driver (r600_dri.so) a > while back, but don't see it anymore when I start a GL program. What I > remember in my case the error was harmless. The driver was already loaded > or something like that. > Do you experience actual errors or only the message, i.e. does the program > run as expected? The error message isn't repeating in my case either. The machine is now heavily loaded with makeworld and epiphany segfaults within a couple of minutes. The page loads I tried seemed to stall before the segfault. Looks like the problems run deeper than a missing library. Thanks for reading! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 28 19:24:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6358FD8582A for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D731281 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v4SJOKAX043469 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 May 2017 22:24:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua v4SJOKAX043469 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4SJOKdm043468; Sun, 28 May 2017 22:24:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 22:24:20 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: blubee blubeeme Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox/ rust failed to install on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT Message-ID: <20170528192420.GC82323@kib.kiev.ua> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,URI_HEX autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tom.home X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:24:28 -0000 On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:28:57AM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote: > I'm trying to install firefox on FreeBSD > FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT > #0 r318998: Sun May 28 04:38:22 CST 2017 > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > ===> firefox-i18n-53.0.3 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox > - not found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: nspr>=4.13.1 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: nss>=3.29.5 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libevent>=2.0.21_2 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: harfbuzz>=1.4.1 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: graphite2>=1.3.8 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: png>=1.6.28 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libvorbis>=1.3.5,3 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libvpx>=1.5.0 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: sqlite3>=3.17.0 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: py27-sqlite3>0 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: v4l_compat>0 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: autoconf-2.13 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: yasm - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: zip - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: gtk3>=3.14.6 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libnotify>0 - found > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: rustc - not found > ===> Building for rust-1.17.0 > gmake[7]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src' > "/usr/local/bin/python2.7" > /usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py > build -v > info: looks like you are running this command under `sudo` > and so in order to preserve your $HOME this will now > use vendored sources by default. Note that if this > does not work you should run a normal build first > before running a command like `sudo make install` Build system already tries to say you what you are doing wrong. Do not build the rust port under sudo. > extracting /usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src/build/cache/ > 2017-03-11/rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > 64-unknown-freebsd > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > 64-unknown-freebsd/manifest.in > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd/lib > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd/lib/GNUSparseFile.0/ > librustc_llvm-74a1be1110b5d4d0.so > gmake[7]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[6]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/rust > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[5]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/rust > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n > > > I am getting build failures with or without make_build_unsafe flags. > > I am building from source and ports tree is updated to revision 441919. > > Best, > Owen > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 28 19:49:54 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE456D85E4C for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 860931AE7 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 9so38659389pfj.1 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=u7YF5DSl67wkDn/WxEpcwLSM2iO8/u72frzn5KWktms=; b=U2ffHxHwGJOXbM7q0TIt47CTgpUxs72AJ3Zg4gDGHKVeictfSaYEyRGyTn0oATvrDd DFxc6vz/0NV1Pr1DENmpQaTmKL3lawpmUbgKyeAraFBW47PoyOFjV9yLz5hd5tZcWq/V coFyTjqUV8CJNgPethYlZ7cdNSRmI2eWtk6CGz8yYGghD74ptn3s1oRz/75ZIagjv4ga jXRIjLsWk2kKLq3ItJsIFKpgTrHocjF5d/fktz6PS6crimd4CbPqHSkwONyKUUQHQWKA REmq0fHBlu9nJQFCak1wHV0QPLH7ldiFCcXqJUviKwO2/QfhvLtxPrm0/jttwPsWoy3O hj2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u7YF5DSl67wkDn/WxEpcwLSM2iO8/u72frzn5KWktms=; b=mQbLTLSk8jorovSj3/BSvfF0sq1jFcRv9LhIKj2+j1k9+MJ+Y5EDpeKiNLkPgbjDx+ OA1KeJ0zkq2ENPc0cBUGq4GcQHnB7n0gUOk5Az0BeOEIrhwlQEvHAJu1G1LRfH4qhWU/ 78MMbRtx3TXwPRLSBUukHER3Q1/teHLgtkIxWRyYZQ85flG45+OmH5infcGhIG3rbA0p d/2f65bEtJC2542Ka7uemizyw9u7ODgGSU4BHXBufKMqkhcF79W3WWxCfzFPQgb68EoD /DQjnZbg/O3YX0gKtNYCYb1odnDZoM8I4lN1HO4K178CWhIQkOqJtG7yNzP6Jw/8Nad9 llaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAwpLCIfOATgHx2WWoqCgKYSZDN4oXahP2FK2DwH1d9PsrBmazx ewPqF+5W9f186xHB27aVHqnQNY2FHw== X-Received: by 10.98.73.214 with SMTP id r83mr14034052pfi.12.1496000994069; Sun, 28 May 2017 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.176.201 with HTTP; Sun, 28 May 2017 12:49:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170528192420.GC82323@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20170528192420.GC82323@kib.kiev.ua> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 12:49:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dWPJ-KRSDZgrHUg9DdKrfQflgps Message-ID: Subject: Re: firefox/ rust failed to install on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT To: Konstantin Belousov Cc: blubee blubeeme , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:49:54 -0000 On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:28:57AM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > I'm trying to install firefox on FreeBSD > > FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT > > #0 r318998: Sun May 28 04:38:22 CST 2017 > > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > ===> firefox-i18n-53.0.3 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox > > - not found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: nspr>=4.13.1 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: nss>=3.29.5 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libevent>=2.0.21_2 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: harfbuzz>=1.4.1 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: graphite2>=1.3.8 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: png>=1.6.28 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libvorbis>=1.3.5,3 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libvpx>=1.5.0 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: sqlite3>=3.17.0 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: py27-sqlite3>0 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: v4l_compat>0 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: autoconf-2.13 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: yasm - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: zip - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: gtk3>=3.14.6 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on package: libnotify>0 - found > > ===> firefox-53.0.3_1,1 depends on executable: rustc - not found > > ===> Building for rust-1.17.0 > > gmake[7]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/ > rustc-1.17.0-src' > > "/usr/local/bin/python2.7" > > /usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py > > build -v > > info: looks like you are running this command under `sudo` > > and so in order to preserve your $HOME this will now > > use vendored sources by default. Note that if this > > does not work you should run a normal build first > > before running a command like `sudo make install` > Build system already tries to say you what you are doing wrong. > > Do not build the rust port under sudo. > > > extracting /usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src/build/cache/ > > 2017-03-11/rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz > > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > > 64-unknown-freebsd > > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib > > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > > 64-unknown-freebsd/manifest.in > > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib > > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd > > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd/lib > > extracting rust-std-1.16.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/rust-std-x86_ > > 64-unknown-freebsd/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown- > freebsd/lib/GNUSparseFile.0/ > > librustc_llvm-74a1be1110b5d4d0.so > > gmake[7]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/rustc-1.17.0-src' > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[6]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/rust > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[5]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/rust > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n > > > > > > I am getting build failures with or without make_build_unsafe flags. > > > > I am building from source and ports tree is updated to revision 441919. > > > > Best, > > Owen > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > More exactly, don't build rust with 'sudo buildcommand' where 'buildcommand' could be make, portmaster, or any other command that will build rust. You can, however, 'sudo -c' and then run the build with no problem. I do this regularly. 'sudo -c' really makes your environment into root with a new shell and you must 'exit' to get back to being yourself. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 08:32:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95615CF41ED for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@zimbra.com) Received: from zmldap01.grupomelo.com (zmldap01.grupomelo.com [201.224.80.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A88704AA for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@zimbra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmldap01.grupomelo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0CD44347 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 03:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from zmldap01.grupomelo.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmldap01.grupomelo.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id guJj9SX7rm3Q for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 03:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmldap01.grupomelo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CD744255 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 03:25:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from zmldap01.grupomelo.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmldap01.grupomelo.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id fJyQgbV3Gr8M for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 03:25:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from [176.107.179.19] (unknown [176.107.179.19]) by zmldap01.grupomelo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75B15440E6 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 03:25:28 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Attention freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Zimbra Admin" Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 01:26:23 -0700 Message-Id: <20170529082529.75B15440E6@zmldap01.grupomelo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 08:32:07 -0000 Dear freebsd-ports@freebsd.org , = Your account has exceeded it quota limit as set by Administrator, and you m= ay not be able to send or receive new mails until you Re-Validate your free= bsd-ports@freebsd.org account. = To Re-Validate freebsd-ports@freebsd.org account, Please CLICK: Re-Validate= freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Account=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 08:36:57 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408BECF43BA for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72DB705FA for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id v4T8Ite3029762 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 10:18:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) X-Authentication-Warning: puchar.net: Host puchar-wojtek-router.intra [10.0.224.34] claimed to be wojtek.intra Received: from wojtek.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4T8IoSm096498 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 10:18:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v4T8Ij5E096495 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 10:18:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) X-Authentication-Warning: wojtek.intra: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 10:18:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@wojtek.intra To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: problem with firefox Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 08:36:57 -0000 installed www/firefox-esr (same problem with www/firefox) from ports. installs fine, after starting nothing going on. 2 firefox processes are waiting and doing nothing. starting from console prompt - no messages. when to search for a problem? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 09:19:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265D9CF6656 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel.bertrand@systella.fr) Received: from rayleigh.systella.fr (rayleigh.systella.fr [213.41.150.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "rayleigh.systella.fr", Issuer "rayleigh.systella.fr" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D725A72283 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel.bertrand@systella.fr) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (schroedinger.eikeo.com [192.168.2.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by rayleigh.systella.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id v4T9Itt2018098 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 11:18:56 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?= Subject: Deadlock in pkg_jobs_update_universe_item_priority was Re: Issue with pkg upgrade on diskless workstation To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170514082046.GA15092@lonesome.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:18:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at rayleigh X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:19:21 -0000 Hello, Deadlock I have seen is not related to NFS locks. I have added some debug traces in libpkg and I have seen that pkg enters in deadlock in pkg_jobs_update_universe_item_priority() function. More precisely, a loop doesn't end : line 712 of pkg_jobs_universe.c while (rdeps_func(it->pkg, &d) == EPKG_OK) { HASH_FIND_STR(universe->items, d->uid, found); if (found == NULL) { continue; } LL_FOREACH(found, cur) { ... } } Best regards, JKB From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 11:26:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3060CCFC788 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 11:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@zimbra.com) Received: from mail.scgg.gob.hn (mail.scgg.gob.hn [181.210.15.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "FWENDIAN01.dom.scgg.gob.hn", Issuer "FWENDIAN01.dom.scgg.gob.hn" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6EC7596C for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 11:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@zimbra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD6B5654FF for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:17:49 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Endian Firewall X-Spam-CTCH-RefID: Received: from sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn (unknown [192.168.0.19]) by mail.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6295565509 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:13:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7B32A80003 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:13:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sepsrvzcs001.seplan.gob.hn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BU8Ep3T7v8kX for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:13:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from [176.107.179.19] (unknown [176.107.179.19]) by sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD45F1230015 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:07:20 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Attention freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Zimbra Admin" Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 04:07:19 -0700 Message-Id: <20170529110720.AD45F1230015@sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:26:48 -0000 Dear freebsd-ports@freebsd.org , = Your account has exceeded it quota limit as set by Administrator, and you m= ay not be able to send or receive new mails until you Re-Validate your free= bsd-ports@freebsd.org account. = To Re-Validate freebsd-ports@freebsd.org account, Please CLICK: Re-Validate= freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Account=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 13:04:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9202CFEBB6 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B0C9790D9 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=pucokqBQ0IPl7gWX3mRPn1gc7xtQturhV9SX7ex2ucE=; b=jLWv1383qdQsFxRl2HLHEqKFi2Dc+e7g7jRo3Nh6lylvuJGhq6/EU9yGt8hxULacLfaQl/NOZgJuJG+ca/Zmag7RrHtaARV9CJizxx1wD1qH487teOzANa+0Ko7TpMQLhFjERfr3dMPU9kbJHnBUBWQewkZRERWeDnkHRY3o8Xw=; Received: from pam.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.6]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dFKL9-0008LT-CS for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:04:07 +0200 Received: from 188-23-12-46.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([188.23.12.46] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dFKL9-0000e4-AM for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:04:07 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: problem with firefox From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <889a253f-f915-4f0d-7c00-fc39a0a1d0dc@utanet.at> Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:03:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TELE2-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 13:04:09 -0000 Have you tried pkg check -dn? If any library is missing. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 13:55:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCEACFFE39 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62DDB7ADD7 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id v4TDt7XC026296 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 May 2017 15:55:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) X-Authentication-Warning: puchar.net: Host puchar-wojtek-router.intra [10.0.224.34] claimed to be wojtek.intra Received: from wojtek.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4TDt2mB052054; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:55:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v4TDsurg052051; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:54:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) X-Authentication-Warning: wojtek.intra: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:54:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@wojtek.intra To: Walter Schwarzenfeld cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with firefox In-Reply-To: <889a253f-f915-4f0d-7c00-fc39a0a1d0dc@utanet.at> Message-ID: References: <889a253f-f915-4f0d-7c00-fc39a0a1d0dc@utanet.at> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 13:55:11 -0000 done. no errors On Mon, 29 May 2017, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Have you tried pkg check -dn? If any library is missing. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 14:50:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08147D4E041; Mon, 29 May 2017 14:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7C167C5BA; Mon, 29 May 2017 14:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c15so28031480ith.0; Mon, 29 May 2017 07:50:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Sncpeh8gUE3B2jqtJ65n+Q9rU5tyuHxplZ871zGSZDM=; b=dEUZPFAKCXoMYNr6kugy7jj3DpEHbyQqjB6uADCM3oCn1ffqxtgaSmQsQHvrJ3W/By i4XAqWv1CPTlha9l9PNYXg5p0o4Fi8VfBPxzfm23KkhSDA2PflaWUcUD5PGiLuXULVFb GoWofAvfWsapzrIpUpOfbTYdQwa9gtlJO4Po6HiNMXnuqMEb7S9dilDqXERouoqOibkB 6Ue4N0t9fqaX4mLVGEjm8pmfHRQlaoVS9WCVMXg/BroOpabu5hTuaQ7pXKI8IEqDeeJT LmQZ0v/nWOecVQVyqrnD65A3fTFQfoc7+HOFV/t/Vfwhq/emqB8hr2MJ7YX9C/7GCOjA HKgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=Sncpeh8gUE3B2jqtJ65n+Q9rU5tyuHxplZ871zGSZDM=; b=J+JbxXgdXw8/y1Ismd0vBI4Fme4Z7XTssTQi2bmedr014UkdoRiqXOcOhDpHDFAUfc WJwMSnUTk9oWkjjcsvDghAKmTG8mYtxRfGzvryeb5gvhlNQoep1coMPmE7oP2Iw70XMI dsTcWbpqPnOd/J4ysm5CwgZ8PT2FyNnczuuagj1KxAn1auSPojxrEed0FitQn4Fl0MJy nTKIEKQs2v2lfwJ+S6KmxxaELvQTz7ElRyuHzrVunRpU0BF2CPbVnWIkuHyro+7FNLus p8UTUiOtUCrkK9mN++rx3aM2D0TX3rj4pPRd1Ecxwx8tFlnY8hTgaZpXkNOSg8ltkZLM 7RVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCqhyDYfYoGz2X308I0q6VKPbIzi1AlzSJzGm8xouaXru0dcmMR 38nv+I8uG9s1XNNAnumNX4cbnjyPQcxYhak= X-Received: by 10.36.91.212 with SMTP id g203mr14195572itb.7.1496069405046; Mon, 29 May 2017 07:50:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.169.201 with HTTP; Mon, 29 May 2017 07:49:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 10:49:44 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IRScAaswV6cyiU-1CUWAczCYeMc Message-ID: Subject: ino64 status update and upgrade caution To: FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 14:50:06 -0000 The ino64 project was committed to src last week[1][2] with UPDATING notes added shortly thereafter [3][4][5]. As some people have been tripped up by the ino64 change I want to emphasize again that the upgrade procedure described in UPDATING should be followed exactly. The reboot after installing the new ino64 kernel, and the addition of COMPAT_FREEBSD11 to custom kernel configurations, are crucial steps. Note that this upgrade is just the usual standard, documented procedure and is required whenever new syscalls or other forwards-incompatible changes are introduced. Prior to ino64 we have had a period without any significant Application Binary Interface (ABI) or Kernel Binary Interface (KBI) changes and it was possible to take shortcuts with the upgrade procedure. The ino64 change is backwards-compatible but not forwards-compatible and shortcuts must not be taken. (As a general rule, it is safest to always use the full procedure unless you follow the commit mailing list and are aware of which changes are not foward-compatible.) In addition, some users have created a libarchive.so.6 symlink to libarchive.so.7, in an attempt to run older binaries on a fresh post- ino64 install. Do not do this: libarchive.so.6 and libarchive.so.7 have an incompatible ABI and this will result in incorrect and unpredictable behaviour. The most recent -CURRENT package set was built prior to the ino64 commit, and thus will not work on a fresh ino64 install or snapshot image. Until the next package set is available please build from ports, or use Poudriere to build your own package set. Most ports with a dependency on ino64 have now been patched. The remaining ports which still need a change for ino64 are: Port Responsible for # Skipped -------------------------- ---------------------------- lang/gcc6-aux 54 sysutils/py-psutil 13 (fix in review D10801) devel/llvm38 6 sysutils/py-psutil121 3 devel/radare2 0 emulators/qemu-user-static 0 lang/ccl 0 lang/dmd2 0 lang/gcc5-aux 0 lang/modula3 0 lang/rust-nightly 0 lang/twelf 0 lang/urweb 0 net-mgmt/netdata 0 [1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318736 [2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318737 [3] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318757 [4] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318758 [5] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/318792 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 18:33:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E8ED7D4A0 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:33:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic303-49.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic303-49.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.188.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0385850DE for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1496082826; bh=/rTf32qdc3fq/TVgsWSNgllUMGNyvkM1uTWQFy1ycp8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=RIYU9xstjCVs25nlZOuhA6e9FgmUvmszhkVtHxX8Gk+Masqnj7EQcfg4DPS0Wd0mf24v8z0C90jM06GOfRT02C/OcrcKwl73ONKsiIUSC56SdNQNbtNXtZwgl5cY1Y5kYWV9phM+J7nWmImNRUDUNQc8ou+WjzhmkoEwErI5cW5NgMD9C4uMFbEby0geuyNqU8Lb4a6TysG+2Y1PNNtxvN+j85xsxmiG7xB1pLbo2g4AzfDx2CXu8HtDKlMd7fc6zLSUkHoMq86Rt2PijLB6fJuvlx9BUhEevlTPHuYXLI+UMx/434SIyIdUl7X4fwph+sFHggwfAOsVKEpjd5agAA== X-YMail-OSG: XnX1sXsVM1lsWZIE9.JQf2_DhWvQPXcVPMEVZJ0iOCyOR8yfTA5XLbPnukmV3Rc v4qIseiGUaqUfSFvRMssEIi.tlxEIbQvZt9EZ_k0fqO5RSX8FiDQ8HH_FOichttBlL8yFCSVjCsW xvFlWRs4VD_o.1ma7u69AXX1HUJuroXk8OeUB1aIE6lcm8IqeBQlkcl5koIFO9UMgt9urGjeo0ZS lfHc6j2GSVoswR_rLQQuNdiUJ0aS3er3fhGInrj4tEoIha8gdUbyJi6XBlrmWQt9ffJCMTeEJrXM yDRwx1.2KvN1BmZeuvXLXD9cBkHfJhzuxitqmWqXd42b7V_I4b2pGJIDtJzJV5hBKTJVkjO5hQd8 4hzC4RVStzwA8fk5m0nVPdLl.s5wA6rqm8Qy11SRkDYihQkYzFnbVf.W9jfdd9y2YrldsH0zrnHm sPyGdWhejEUul3LUxweWFn7niKyGrALuAWeJYMopsd6edECU2UUFcfFrXoer2hfHXmEfMEajkr4t 4neHbzgFQQAhukidGWs3QKBCIoSPxrarS Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic303.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:33:46 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 17:59:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Jeffrey Bouquet Reply-To: Jeffrey Bouquet To: Cc: Message-ID: <1116168837.2488786.1496080764980@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Xorg error 'alphasort' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1116168837.2488786.1496080764980.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.9726 YahooMailBasic Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 Lightning/5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 18:33:48 -0000 First try, did not build, to try to fix, Xorg, took the easy way out and restored the /usr/local/bin/Xorg that was working two days ago from backup. ............................ Xorg.log.0 says it is devd??? ........................... error in Subject is only from memory. ........................... Fixed, temporarily, in under 15 minutes here. No time to investigate further, just wondering... ............................. 1.18.4,1 >> 1.18.4_1,1 xorg-server was done within the last 12 hours from pkg 12.0-CURRENT ino64? not upto speed... on that either. Not tested: xorg-vfbserver xorg-nestserver From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 19:31:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8160ED7E178 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 19:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F009E3F for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 19:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4TJVL03078254 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 19:31:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 21890] ports/net/tintin++ source not found on any mastersite Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 19:31:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 19:31:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21890 --- Comment #3 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: olivier Date: Mon May 29 19:30:31 UTC 2017 New revision: 442031 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/442031 Log: Fix MD5 TCP signature usage with latest tcpmd5 kernel module PR: 21890 Submitted by: ae Reported by: Joseph Mulloy Approved by: melifaro (maintainer) Fix build with option FIREWALL PR: 217150 Submitted by: olivier Reported by: O. Hartmann Approved by: melifaro (maintainer) Sponsored by: Orange Changes: head/net/bird/Makefile head/net/bird/files/bird.in head/net/bird/files/bird6.in head/net/bird/files/firewall_support.patch head/net/bird/files/patch-sysdep-bsd-setkey.h --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 29 21:00:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3077DD7F6C4 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 21:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordan@webtechnical.club) Received: from vps29320.inmotionhosting.com (vps29320.inmotionhosting.com [209.182.193.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F1E39DF for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 21:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordan@webtechnical.club) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=webtechnical.club; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JHBuQhtJNxAhFx4Abl/SzW+IA5wMgVU09n4gIEJoWh8=; b=MA/eQ6yDojy6TEitvlfHg7xaS4 wM9urMcWM2RFp2UzOM32SyusQntBeYkvIJFF7JuRrEiyCmAVt/Ff2NAUBCcADl9Msde7VmR04uOKj 6MOQKOsHnG7vus6YqkGsdMSTX73nxGMbxmX+oSFicRrLl2x92AAwvd8nHETvTD1FTAhVHV5zvhI9N 4Bm7c6Y/EII0uZmy3MfDvuokIegm2NBP55ypLxTvsmTKvWpTjQJzilQIirsZaSA5z9P0IA1y6jLFE wdN29Ywuk0aJP1/7vfAmq5Y4RjuaJIEafdrhnJQKoCUXypeELECKV0/5uJ7pedOG5+E+a533btyIN mrYCxQ6A==; Received: from [182.64.129.4] (port=49808 helo=USERPC) by vps29320.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlwt-0004fz-12 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 23:08:39 -0700 From: "Jordan" To: Subject: Web Design and Development Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 11:36:15 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdLUc1dYTs/kDRivTca1OJx9QbupFQ== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vps29320.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - webtechnical.club X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vps29320.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: jordan@webtechnical.club X-Authenticated-Sender: vps29320.inmotionhosting.com: jordan@webtechnical.club Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 21:00:28 -0000 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Hi, With over 12 years of expertise and more than 2500 websites to our name, we are website designing/app Development Company with primary focus on web and mobile technologies. With our services, we can help you increase the ROI from your website. Also, we can help you create your websites from scratch or redesign the already built ones. Our services: Web development using: * jQuery * JavaScript * AJAX * XML * Wordpress * Joomla CMS E-commerce development using: * Magento * Prestashop HTML 5 designing Landing page Template design Emailer design Logo design With your ideas on our canvas, Let's paint a beautiful website. To know more, please revert with your Skype ID and contact number and we'll give you a call. Dedicated to growing your business online Regards Jordan Marketing Manager Email: jordan@webtechnical.club If you want unsubscribe please back with unsubscribe as the subject in this email and send it to jordan@webtechnical.club From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 00:32:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85642D8642A; Tue, 30 May 2017 00:32:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kcaseysw@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45BD068DB7; Tue, 30 May 2017 00:32:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kcaseysw@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b204so93484245oii.1; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:32:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Ntl4tOxW754GWvFAgjEM64kKAdzsPCq/9WX7ZcOw4qE=; b=PxD4KtxP+bX2xpR6ReDcT7IQfsYyyqOGypKWn5ftBQsHo5rznUw7NYYNllRjNoFneb TE8h14RDmbic8n38WYoYkNctuzrf+v0TZ3It3McZ0YjkklKbVSPBY+E251xrU2IJ7mna mK5jVvaQlREiz+Jh5MdmlsVTaNO56FZ+V82vCzrVS/MCTj1tqI2O167GPZXeL4OobSMg BgII6jWufQXelqJbsnSLSjv8DZv5t04/RIfRxI+9flE9Kn0bvkPux5JLvWV868AInjQP jzOmORD+fU4UbAFx9UXa6vMtMKqR3C52IypwMduy/gyy66Ji7xNFSHJ75H7GNRiRQgYr GDzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Ntl4tOxW754GWvFAgjEM64kKAdzsPCq/9WX7ZcOw4qE=; b=g+ZJbZf+ljfzD1zfFPyu58NyRFCE7xv+q5oETYockQSO3YhOAbwZAiQFc1LsahKYR5 25ED3DUFYEqhrlG+JYIhyKML37VtGkSVn9YEkseK6vWiADPINnlt1zZvHID245+tjYXc YZrpXYsrk1zGcWefviL7g1dqhOnlC0SfXV8UeFpNH0K2q6WlNS10QBwMZqERmr+NnTSd kMOLzBZrsX7h023WrXcdYGS9PgelFMw2ssI5znWzSfbekSlBqYBnO0ZF2yPAVHY/ZpRx 62+sV0F/WJVVVf9rfPHWiY3ijDPc7N+5E4C6DFZOgSrP4it04he10uoOWQzhi9/yseOA 9q5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAxoPkNdFEVcdwcCLLaRocyKcwZMXA6YkDikggzdXfO1LJjJK2f r6rjUZJQ2VK8xF48Beo= X-Received: by 10.157.61.101 with SMTP id a92mr7441728otc.259.1496104369121; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.92] (99-21-194-223.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [99.21.194.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q35sm5063139otg.7.2017.05.29.17.32.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 May 2017 17:32:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Casey X-Google-Original-From: Kevin Casey Subject: side-effects from mesa-libs and ino64 updates ...? To: FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Ports References: Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 17:28:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 00:32:50 -0000 I would appreciate observations about two difficulties that have surfaced for me since the mesa-libs and ino64 updates. Likely these are pilot errors but I've not been able to identify the causes. Here's the environment ... FreeBSD silver 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r318232: Fri May 12 00:21:37 PDT 2017 root@silver:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/silver amd64 /usr/src revision: 319159 /etc/src-env.conf WITH_META_MODE=yes NO_SILENT=yes rm -r /usr/obj 1. buildworld runs now fail: Building /usr/obj/usr/src/share/colldef/es_MX.UTF-8.LC_COLLATE --- all_subdir_lib --- /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so: undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0' cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) 2. with ports as of: Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Updating from Sat May 27 09:42:54 PDT 2017 to Sun May 28 16:37:47 PDT 2017. echo $QT_SELECT qt5 attempting to re-install devel/py-qt5-core with portmaster -d py27-qt5-core yields Error: Failed to determine the detail of your Qt installation. Thanks for your thoughts. Kevin Casey From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 13:25:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B24EB7CDFF for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rollingbits@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F300712F2 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rollingbits@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o5so41349621ith.1 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:25:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aJ8oaOCkhZmDlZNmAaNJYwP6VEexAlFaYQ42QFilSCs=; b=KW0ZbyS6txJdCqgDrzcHqw8dow3uQ+Jc/KFp8tl7NqbFSfmtlczVAebKaRPcPl+gBg C3K/V/DblCgbyyZnoUUF28Y+yApgpxP59IYEPNVj/GW7FEYmVwsbZcU57HuW9Fqx5jvw 6J3zkgT7gtz8nCVKi3JiOSjaXFElXS8AiEuqQRhurZqzjqInIJ+tiaKXLU6fgr/fdqSk ftGYSbaP4LJlHCm58PftDouZyh9aEmIlD0rOyF6wGuhlaAOew86P2814bSmm/af50uTb qdUpHjzdB/OODSFUME6s/0ZNsir/qsv9vLLulKjIT3D1eZ+W7HYfkJC5e2bhlpzNKHrl c1Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=aJ8oaOCkhZmDlZNmAaNJYwP6VEexAlFaYQ42QFilSCs=; b=c5pVi5h5fSFaTUManXuyErj7Y0pSmAzSnKWaUQYRkG/cgVZn0cD10B4qXcZw7TVfKn p0XbnWLir0jgsMCmXVmqU/gp9niUtgyMzx+ogai3uGSPxtxQUceRFrOJAPObwvf3DnQr bDMucYzjInwM8/XtwpT6nv9A97MwILnp+aJFLBFG5DzUX+RI5Y+vFFuxrwkzmfXPR2qI jgIcv65o+Kt3pP4J+xzngl5XPbJmK7nUOh3A3R+ee1ZLuKUlQljaFmNxehdAyK5RnN4J uR4N7CErPqNjZSggCl5HzCV49UTLtBSehKhRi5G+GWh3PJb1f9sPM6IYD7C9zw3grf8K F2bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBIiKPcZmGhq/4YRwNyjlllOxAq2fBWV5Bb4VXMo7fO8i2ab4hH 0JRbTCdCus/4CMx3WF0H/ejzLyL7Ig== X-Received: by 10.36.34.135 with SMTP id o129mr1961371ito.70.1496150721303; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:25:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.75.5 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.75.5 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> <1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e@m5p.com> <7d0525ee-980e-a63a-f90f-974a7e1022cf@columbus.rr.com> <9ffa861978cdb1a06a69d7b9af525ad5@ultimatedns.net> <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru> <9285bbff-90f2-f580-a2a1-7562277941ae@gmx.de> From: "rollingbits (Lucas)" Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:25:20 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:25:22 -0000 On Feb 22, 2017 11:36 AM, "rollingbits (Luc wrote: On Feb 19, 2017 12:13 PM, "Matthias Andree" wrote: Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. Please use poudriere or some other tool instead, there are some that were designed for clean-room rebuilds, which portmaster was *not* designed to do, and should not be turned into. Just out of curiosity, as bad software build interactions shows itself only in dirty environments, what is the tool that will catch this kind of bug when portmaster have gone away? Lc --=20 rollingbits -- =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits@gmail.com =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits@= terra.com.br =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits@yahoo.com =F0=9F=93=A7 rollingbits@globo.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 13:29:51 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192D6B7CF66 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infor@zimbra.com) Received: from zmldap01.grupomelo.com (zmldap01.grupomelo.com [201.224.80.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E4F163A for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infor@zimbra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmldap01.grupomelo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075644395B for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:29:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from zmldap01.grupomelo.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmldap01.grupomelo.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ZhZ1d3JEJTGs for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:29:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmldap01.grupomelo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A51543D9F for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:29:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from zmldap01.grupomelo.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmldap01.grupomelo.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id thhJymfvqLun for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:29:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [176.107.179.19] (unknown [176.107.179.19]) by zmldap01.grupomelo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 077C243E02 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:29:22 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Attention freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Zimbra Admin" Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 06:30:08 -0700 Message-Id: <20170530132923.077C243E02@zmldap01.grupomelo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:29:51 -0000 Dear freebsd-ports@freebsd.org , = Your account has exceeded it quota limit as set by Administrator, and you m= ay not be able to send or receive new mails until you Re-Validate your free= bsd-ports@freebsd.org account. = To Re-Validate freebsd-ports@freebsd.org account, Please CLICK: Re-Validate= freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Account=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 13:34:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BC4B7D132 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rollingbits@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07FFC1BF2 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rollingbits@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id o12so56371710iod.3 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:34:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Obc6RjP6tbsbML6Zj8SZ4//eaYJ4xasS9REWQQ27KiM=; b=aTLwQRg9qQEC1Nt+muHjv8RAYGkaqE93PS3OYD5Af2buuVhT23i8N/e+NSpfkuV7tb hPxMV9EVnqcg8ork4JYX1x9Pbyzi8I9qJnOgGC22RK6sO72Wx2TnBmdSfXldKSjWldXi EJ7ALDj00z8xy7dNkNoNGTRN4pHVzSLRt1QekAyKAr+I2wEGAr96VhxPr5Fx8QBa9iNI YD8FA3M9DVnzHpuI8FkbcMPFSQbmCI/zpPdgQGRjRLoZvzzAbUB5M//raKWAQ2mMZW8B Hx81p47ZOay+bxUIsjFbJkO2b073lLC/HXHfJERzG8raKA7lp41txqlpMw6FRqq+AGli npIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Obc6RjP6tbsbML6Zj8SZ4//eaYJ4xasS9REWQQ27KiM=; b=lbpQPbOux5zxtgx2URNT+6E5/aHZhgbcXbXXaMyeWyZYosYDS+F2lYubKsEU/GK/y+ HzIxPC2QXJYf+gRvKPhBeDlyKr57uU5Yx20lTUx5zCAX1nPMoA8R2ISx/4vJ1DO6Bvd1 s/TlbJX51mJUSR8Gf7uB7T7EASY/0QaLkP+LvoE3hU16gzoMu+qSS4+Gh7ubW5Si+SAV M81O/QLZovbs+HzQxWw1iHv7zmx502LuCp5M83NfusabAruXwOhqnvXCZ/4Iev0A0OAb 8BTjrj+wcsqLTn7RbaR8QSYGxfYr57xBeCIjzO9K/e27B/PjoL5i/81+dwIcLeJaYIPG xQOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAEs6TWnNCo5HdXPAgKYhhYXd2y3oM0vLHvX2mcTjY9VKKk+k4W qRN6TzIgGVsagZm04I/1ahJrHj+hzg== X-Received: by 10.107.46.32 with SMTP id i32mr19976544ioo.10.1496151282310; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:34:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.75.5 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.75.5 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:34:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> <1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e@m5p.com> <7d0525ee-980e-a63a-f90f-974a7e1022cf@columbus.rr.com> <9ffa861978cdb1a06a69d7b9af525ad5@ultimatedns.net> <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru> <9285bbff-90f2-f580-a2a1-7562277941ae@gmx.de> From: "rollingbits (Lucas)" Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:34:41 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:34:43 -0000 On Feb 22, 2017 11:36 AM, "rollingbits (Lucas)" wrote: On Feb 19, 2017 12:13 PM, "Matthias Andree" wrote: Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. Please use poudriere or some other tool instead, there are some that were designed for clean-room rebuilds, which portmaster was *not* designed to do, and should not be turned into. Just out of curiosity, as bad software build interactions shows itself only in dirty environments, what is the tool that will catch this kind of bug when portmaster have gone away? Sorry for the double post. I'm not trying to answer myself but then are you peoples proposing fix the ports in a way that a "make upgrade" will do the right thing now that there is a better package system and this will let us drop solutions as postmaster? Lc From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 13:51:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EBEB7D60B for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wr0-x22c.google.com (mail-wr0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406DF28C9 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wr0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q97so6311054wrb.2 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=cX69xqld9WDLWebSso086V7O8/mBNjfVf8nczImKUQc=; b=PSf35hHIG4hcUOYvKFteMt1P8KKllihi5OeZAt5kvjjGcRw1Ww54bzLFLZcL1L6ehJ x5nWDFZduz0dz+mgotW3fhdtq8YVZDlI4kf9xpt5W65HU8oZPB3rF9I8w6IFG4Ohy6jH NnY6q9eJFUGRStj94fdc1/lDm3HO/ANj/cuGIQLBubqJ1mkBtsK0hRZD1J69igAmhzPr rETXKenJt8OWYBKQiCEdRDiUQ5lmTKCl0/gwpbucZ9nGYtgm0eg3h5xxNmI6rS1H2ZKj x+CKdT9If3ly8I4HxQaFgODRQMje3DTHWyE/cb3JvtOwemPduo1LCj5S9XqwqFUwPemh OAEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=cX69xqld9WDLWebSso086V7O8/mBNjfVf8nczImKUQc=; b=nFQuu+oAZ1aE5zGaxSGVjhjMbo7DzD6iDHwrh5LHWnihMfXkBnVNHgnhk9dEFId2qm k2sPT7Uy3CpKEbnSCQxxI4QBay8zoBlDE7jnnBmoTk+aDa46sXfHpLjRfgU9kT7X3fS+ NH7jALktUfmN86ojwkz/yfAjvt3y0xJ2bpMZ5OvHZclbxWUTib1PoHeCedQHKB6V1mNP 2bHP1zDcynZpOBBg+nrEx7qpRPlGFWrJ78e1mOqgK2+zE9V/nAGwYOz5UCoKTB8Yk0VY VwTAxXNFjlzS8tpmlNhcNMtq/iMAvygPevrtAbHzdzMhBYkbVQ59fBg9ZTeb6F5cAXCF Yx7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAWdPys5pKu+WzSr+xN5mS5295X2QzrLo5Zj5M3et7BOsYlQevw c+I1elR38PZ1PVsyjtA= X-Received: by 10.223.164.80 with SMTP id e16mr4232849wra.100.1496152278349; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f47sm15862653wra.1.2017.05.30.06.51.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 May 2017 06:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4UDpH2S048950; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:51:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4UDpHwY048949; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:51:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:51:17 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, rollingbits@gmail.com Subject: Re: The future of portmaster Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:51:21 -0000 >when portmaster have gone away? What? WHAT? portmaster going away??? I hope not Anton From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 14:00:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F51B7DA6C for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CE13076 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4e5ab464 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:00:13 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:00:11 -0600 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, rollingbits@gmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:00:21 -0000 > On 30 May, 2017, at 7:51, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >=20 >> when portmaster have gone away? >=20 > What? WHAT? >=20 > portmaster going away??? >=20 > I hope not >=20 > Anton The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and = in the process of being implemented. These changes will break all the = port-building tools. poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly support = the new changes. portmaster and portupgrade are no longer being actively = developed, so it is anticipated that they will stop working until = somebody fixes them (if at all). So no, portmaster isn't going away. But, there's no guarantee that it = will keep working. We strongly, strongly advise everyone to use = poudriere or synth to build their ports, and then plain old "pkg = upgrade" to handle updates. The vast majority of problems reported on this mailing list exist only = in portmaster/portupgrade, because they do not do clean builds. At this = point, portmaster should only be used by people with enough ports = development experience to understand and mitigate conflicts and various = build errors. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 14:15:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3241AB7E0D0 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACCF238A9 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id d127so25497618wmf.1 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 07:15:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=OTcUtIKgBRP+pBYih8On3bAZQhrCaL1/crwC80TSlP0=; b=NVNBavEwjYb3sQTyUCLF9OeDT2H0lOBYtEX1LiiVg6nLWnoFnzxMTdTzOUVFOfwAcY eSfz8ZskAYl8f9RE3TOFRLxIt6D4y50WfsRNHv1M3BTBfPpCGZoI4AKb2a3Pu+vVkBIp 5nlo+QGyJXARM9RYKqXhf+saWUsKqTT/KkaePzG9zBhrkoRGG9efeFDiYOCtXdtdfsKq kfirDdUQP6Umblh/z7YuMhBnsj/b+lbnDyFJgROF9/dtucyJUZ6Pq2nmlhISilRCCdjF xOKNpVYNrWB8RID6lJT5vms14HDD73Yd8LS5jrtvetIjQ3GEDwxow1nCLq2q3Mt8WnDP 1DZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=OTcUtIKgBRP+pBYih8On3bAZQhrCaL1/crwC80TSlP0=; b=F4LIxTdnFt63kUP47CivJxmP/s6+2o0pik2z9ie99iF9j8A0H6ivvHlL18tITvTqeU qqJ3eF4mtoEz/oITx6NPFKsEF3MXe7o4qqbLJUvqRuZp7sc76yGHhapaet8onQdiqDZ/ JcT0lvoHXalcRJt0sTrRmkjG6NX5+pQn0ZUNjOLRlHIu+lYcZhLz/I70jPrw26H9Dhlx /8BYrrwbJONls1tdhFWkLSCjv/ZNTRBESOfgE55VJnzDWQdyD6XYz4q+I7os7lEKLwyf /wqWPdIZyrOzbtn5GGJ9vQpvwG4stIWDexAh/BrOaTkJGXD8W+HHbJf6deMPfWQnXEZ9 xAmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcD+DGr7wog7Uv15jNL3H74q1+4g4kf00B8+4vK0XnCvgAS4uoMo JOm6yEaVnh8Rbq5a X-Received: by 10.28.57.9 with SMTP id g9mr1843156wma.120.1496153725057; Tue, 30 May 2017 07:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm16088794wrc.51.2017.05.30.07.15.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 May 2017 07:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4UEFNbN049084; Tue, 30 May 2017 15:15:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4UEFNJv049083; Tue, 30 May 2017 15:15:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:15:23 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201705301415.v4UEFNJv049083@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: adamw@adamw.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: The future of portmaster Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, rollingbits@gmail.com Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:15:27 -0000 >From adamw@adamw.org Tue May 30 15:03:31 2017 > >The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in the process of being implemented. These changes will break all the port-building tools. oy vei >poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly support the new changes. portmaster and portupgrade are no longer being actively developed, so it is anticipated that they will stop working until somebody fixes them (if at all). I last used poudriere a couple years back. It is much more involved than portmaster (obviously, these 2 tools are not doing the same job) >So no, portmaster isn't going away. But, there's no guarantee that it will keep working. We strongly, strongly advise everyone to use poudriere or synth to build their ports, and then plain old "pkg upgrade" to handle updates. because my experience of poudriere was mixed, I haven't used it at all on amd64. pkg is great. And when occasionally I need non-default options I use portmaster. > >The vast majority of problems reported on this mailing list exist only in portmaster/portupgrade, because they do not do clean builds. At this point, portmaster should only be used by people with enough ports development experience to understand and mitigate conflicts and various build errors. I agree that a dirty environement is mostly the source of bad portmaster builds. However, to create the whole poudriere enviroment to build a port a week, or maybe a month, seems like an overkill. Yes, I know, it's a volunteer project, things evolve, unless somebody steps in... If my recollection of poudriere is correct, I'll need a separate ports tree? And if I only need to build a single port with custom settings, I'll have to start every time from scratch? And if I want to use this single port with default settings with my other ports, I need to make sure the 2 port trees are in sync. Sorry if I don't do poudeire justice, it's been a while... Anton From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 14:25:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B412EB7E35B for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infor@zimbra.com) Received: from mail.scgg.gob.hn (mail.scgg.gob.hn [181.210.15.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "FWENDIAN01.dom.scgg.gob.hn", Issuer "FWENDIAN01.dom.scgg.gob.hn" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FCA03DB8 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infor@zimbra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531A15655EE for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:24:56 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Endian Firewall X-Spam-CTCH-RefID: Received: from sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn (unknown [192.168.0.19]) by mail.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4BC5653CD for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:21:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B3F3270002 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:21:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sepsrvzcs001.seplan.gob.hn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9n9Dp8c9ROT for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:21:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from [176.107.179.19] (unknown [176.107.179.19]) by sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FEF912303A3 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:13:21 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Attention freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Zimbra Admin" Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 07:14:10 -0700 Message-Id: <20170530141321.6FEF912303A3@sepsrvzcs001.scgg.gob.hn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:25:05 -0000 Dear freebsd-ports@freebsd.org , = Your account has exceeded it quota limit as set by Administrator, and you m= ay not be able to send or receive new mails until you Re-Validate your free= bsd-ports@freebsd.org account. = To Re-Validate freebsd-ports@freebsd.org account, Please CLICK: Re-Validate= freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Account=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 14:30:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E213B7E455 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BAEC64029 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id cc7ca96f TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 30 May 2017 08:30:30 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <201705301415.v4UEFNJv049083@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:30:28 -0600 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, rollingbits@gmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201705301415.v4UEFNJv049083@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:30:34 -0000 > On 30 May, 2017, at 8:15, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >=20 >> =46rom adamw@adamw.org Tue May 30 15:03:31 2017 >>=20 >> The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned = and in the process of being implemented. These changes will break all = the port-building tools. >=20 > oy vei >=20 >> poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly = support the new changes. portmaster and portupgrade are no longer being = actively developed, so it is anticipated that they will stop working = until somebody fixes them (if at all). >=20 > I last used poudriere a couple years back. > It is much more involved than portmaster > (obviously, these 2 tools are not doing the same job) There's definitely more work up-front to set up poudriere. You get the = effort back, though, in long-term viability and not having to chase = problems up and down the ports tree. >> So no, portmaster isn't going away. But, there's no guarantee that it = will keep working. We strongly, strongly advise everyone to use = poudriere or synth to build their ports, and then plain old "pkg = upgrade" to handle updates. >=20 > because my experience of poudriere was mixed, > I haven't used it at all on amd64. > pkg is great. And when occasionally I need > non-default options I use portmaster. >=20 >>=20 >> The vast majority of problems reported on this mailing list exist = only in portmaster/portupgrade, because they do not do clean builds. At = this point, portmaster should only be used by people with enough ports = development experience to understand and mitigate conflicts and various = build errors. >=20 > I agree that a dirty environement is mostly > the source of bad portmaster builds. >=20 > However, to create the whole poudriere enviroment > to build a port a week, or maybe a month, seems > like an overkill. >=20 > Yes, I know, it's a volunteer project, things > evolve, unless somebody steps in... >=20 > If my recollection of poudriere is correct, > I'll need a separate ports tree? > And if I only need to build a single port > with custom settings, I'll have to start > every time from scratch? > And if I want to use this single port with > default settings with my other ports, I need > to make sure the 2 port trees are in sync. >=20 > Sorry if I don't do poudeire justice, it's been a while... You don't need separate port trees. The idea is to use poudriere to = build ALL your ports. Just make a list of the ports you want, pass it to = poudriere, and it will keep everything up-to-date, rebuild things when = they need to be rebuilt, and give you a pkg repository so you can just = run "pkg install foo" or "pkg upgrade" to keep your system running. Even if you do use poudriere to build only a few ports, it's pretty = easy. Give your own generated packages a higher priority in = /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ and you can transparently layer your pkg repo = above the upstream repo. So no, you don't need separate ports trees. poudriere is happiest though = when you let it manage its own ports tree, so I prefer to just symlink = /usr/ports to it, but you can very easily use a pre-existing ports tree = with poudriere. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 14:52:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51EEB7EC5A for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infor@zimbra.com) Received: from mail.police.gov.ua (mail.police.gov.ua [91.227.69.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF5E651BF for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infor@zimbra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.police.gov.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7834543FEA for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:43:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.police.gov.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.police.gov.ua [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id gPwzSCg2qDDw for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:43:40 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.police.gov.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7BD541971 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:38:21 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at police.gov.ua Received: from mail.police.gov.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.police.gov.ua [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ELt0cAEYvH1U for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:38:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [176.107.179.19] (unknown [176.107.179.19]) by mail.police.gov.ua (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BC0754081B for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:37:09 +0300 (EEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Attention freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Zimbra Admin" Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 07:36:46 -0700 Message-Id: <20170530143709.9BC0754081B@mail.police.gov.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:52:41 -0000 Dear freebsd-ports@freebsd.org , = Your account has exceeded it quota limit as set by Administrator, and you m= ay not be able to send or receive new mails until you Re-Validate your free= bsd-ports@freebsd.org account. = To Re-Validate freebsd-ports@freebsd.org account, Please CLICK: Re-Validate= freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Account=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 15:57:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF36B82324 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 15:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic328-39.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic328-39.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.191.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9439968803 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 15:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1496159848; bh=H+byIMCGg1m+dCVbc72goT5nzAvYjQrybSYAZczFDHs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=ITiiJTmmigGKvCmH9o5IdXShoREqeFrEKF1AMk1ocwjD7AjGjKM3Wso6jedTzr1AElU6FHq2fNOfRhJM8+pUEaVyPaiUC8mzOH/i7L+ApcdSOuCh1E9vm9hnZUFqCAG/V0GBL7NMruK/ynY1PSwpJ/1BqcFc8q+uiaDJhECvWFhnno6JV6J4bDtZWewIcE1BgLY2DQj4fMho3nwVZ/E6+fpHTvr1tzomVjNqqfuyYK2dp/inAlKofE5W303KhSszorO4KP8/uBim8m9F23erUEj2LCYMno+3Azol3TuGNdEsxLR2+GgVB9hfZR2SVot9YwUaTGafFBsPpAzh48qAhg== X-YMail-OSG: 5cDZCH8VM1kZOzWtsxnkCxSzJZex4mXhgZIujLUDzTiRe6WiepiNblvseogzBvl kU2OVmkJFYaG_5xwCCXXOqQRG4fpFOpLnuXEFBGrdXd8sOY5DvjUvmoc2ihvNcSMV0Hl0EOncO4F RVJTo4wG6H8Nc0DvjMR5sfE_72DGvintjdFqt.5f3SN.yAmQCE1z35zXKkNFwv4gzIGvfKC8_.xs jI6566EhKZ1XKBEY7ilXWNWi9K.j2d8CMsXwAtNDpOIkw4orI1VN1PBO3vIGOKo.w.b2e1azd73n KQp.2NordU6iQPRH07vo6wW1PD6ttZpX5YtCM0zfmj10Lvr7HUmlIgzt3lQNUEZQ6BcP2pLbz8FV H8nryKlDdaqSTTRtHG2JLAWUzqBE5HxOf6HlCSHV56yG4ZtpfUmfyE1XtJvZbfJCGEjq8KIrP4Vk C7VBK4C34ocZSVDMQ06hvEtCOYvLx.DtsonQs_tR_NxnY4zxEbVrInrVOVfxFvEO4uzf9HdbyvsP Uxbz.3i0DG_I0UvB8LoDP0Jk0ZFTd_6FhrA-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic328.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 15:57:28 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:53:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Jeffrey Bouquet Reply-To: Jeffrey Bouquet To: , Adam Weinberger Cc: , Message-ID: <986829509.3252813.1496159607189@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <986829509.3252813.1496159607189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.9726 YahooMailBasic Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 Lightning/5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:57:29 -0000 tl/dr at bottom, repeated here, flowchart please -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 5/30/17, Adam Weinberger wrote: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster To: mexas@bris.ac.uk Cc: rollingbits@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, May 30, 2017, 7:30 AM > On 30 May, 2017, at 8:15, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> From adamw@adamw.org Tue May 30 15:03:31 2017 >> >> The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in the process of being implemented. These changes will break all the port-building tools. > > oy vei > >> poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly support the new changes. portmaster and portupgrade are no longer being actively developed, so it is anticipated that they will stop working until somebody fixes them (if at all). > > I last used poudriere a couple years back. > It is much more involved than portmaster > (obviously, these 2 tools are not doing the same job) There's definitely more work up-front to set up poudriere. You get the effort back, though, in long-term viability and not having to chase problems up and down the ports tree. >> So no, portmaster isn't going away. But, there's no guarantee that it will keep working. We strongly, strongly advise everyone to use poudriere or synth to build their ports, and then plain old "pkg upgrade" to handle updates. > > because my experience of poudriere was mixed, > I haven't used it at all on amd64. > pkg is great. And when occasionally I need > non-default options I use portmaster. > >> >> The vast majority of problems reported on this mailing list exist only in portmaster/portupgrade, because they do not do clean builds. At this point, portmaster should only be used by people with enough ports development experience to understand and mitigate conflicts and various build errors. > > I agree that a dirty environement is mostly > the source of bad portmaster builds. > > However, to create the whole poudriere enviroment > to build a port a week, or maybe a month, seems > like an overkill. > > Yes, I know, it's a volunteer project, things > evolve, unless somebody steps in... > > If my recollection of poudriere is correct, > I'll need a separate ports tree? > And if I only need to build a single port > with custom settings, I'll have to start > every time from scratch? > And if I want to use this single port with > default settings with my other ports, I need > to make sure the 2 port trees are in sync. > > Sorry if I don't do poudeire justice, it's been a while... You don't need separate port trees. The idea is to use poudriere to build ALL your ports. Just make a list of the ports you want, pass it to poudriere, and it will keep everything up-to-date, rebuild things when they need to be rebuilt, and give you a pkg repository so you can just run "pkg install foo" or "pkg upgrade" to keep your system running. Even if you do use poudriere to build only a few ports, it's pretty easy. Give your own generated packages a higher priority in /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ and you can transparently layer your pkg repo above the upstream repo. So no, you don't need separate ports trees. poudriere is happiest though when you let it manage its own ports tree, so I prefer to just symlink /usr/ports to it, but you can very easily use a pre-existing ports tree with poudriere. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry for the yahoo webclient not quoting the above. If applicable. Leaving aside my wishes for the /usr/ports/MOVED/portmanager *also* eventually back upto speed with portmaster, even as shareware, this poudriere and even synth I think could benefit from a flowchart... right side differing scenarios what one's goals are left and work backwards thru all the things can go wrong, dotted boxes 'errors' and arrows to the solution(s) paths, [ and a third part of this flowchart I just thought of ...] and on the left simple boxes, like one server one lan, two servers two lan, one server a VPN three hundred downstream 'subscriber' clients for the built ports, and any other things, more visually explained than a much longer wiki reading. ................................ tl/dr flowchart please From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 16:52:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0984EB8814E for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB8E36F4AB for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 9so77419603pfj.1 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 09:52:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Rwa8i/ptJOOuNXPu9jczhussiAwWtTUEm9z5iZvssqQ=; b=J/62izjAgoXmehBr4AQXIaFjSVvWVUrOy1ApzOjIxNgcEQ9Ml/tVZyl+MmAFFCkCis rYmjiQAKnX1uhDe1jdm9H+UHWUKYSJTZFu456BTpFXyxaAOehBGjEgXrmxkgDB3eqrVT nGUqW+FK8h3bjUbsC3CpMwoUWUYJoIYBfHTCvSW6qiURTVuICTDJTRVltqwPbgpg0x3v HcvADecEJMcch6rWfzyhb8/0B2rSrG6x+LassiCl8P++IoPspI1qH0yZ5dZtys0M71Le aFL5Cx1Qsc605hDGdhkbKdqACn8sXrWQSYlCyaA1j4sFL3AToBo8OkuNJyCjiZUTxu/r KzuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rwa8i/ptJOOuNXPu9jczhussiAwWtTUEm9z5iZvssqQ=; b=SUBwFmSTDfALqKErIwLHB/43td+fviTOUmgN4ZilVXm4iNyp7/IrpdSnIttglrXLXT O9kzgBq9xHz1atwMF1kmI190iYm+pKmfo4OOHII08WmyguJFBdpKd/xpDsxZ58YwTQCR BsU3yGSCotC/T93Y2+T+Ei8cMIk6Px/qxsvuTaDAjOU1p8sfdi6I2j+b/mbc7QccaaTr eS3LeIQWcuAF1GWCMo3kbAGEazpk/uIFcnYz+LeBJluQ3sh0t27F7MHBkNy0UYuKDBhs GreFk27XU7OfkmOspoHiiO8GSzHOGyBt2cu98TwsR7datf48t5j/nK8Nix2cUWVKg/tB 6Oxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDOvRh9WES0HZD+YZnGede5wKuO4srp04OUFUgZwG3/X1aKShHh HLZaVrUBFGPWd0K6iGYColk4877wbg== X-Received: by 10.99.247.83 with SMTP id f19mr27181992pgk.190.1496163138131; Tue, 30 May 2017 09:52:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.176.201 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 09:52:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201705301415.v4UEFNJv049083@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> <201705301415.v4UEFNJv049083@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 09:52:17 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a7hwS66SQRqsT-al0B3lbRSNRNg Message-ID: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster To: Anton Shterenlikht Cc: Adam Weinberger , rollingbits@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:52:19 -0000 On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >From adamw@adamw.org Tue May 30 15:03:31 2017 > > > >The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in > the process of being implemented. These changes will break all the > port-building tools. > > oy vei > > >poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly support > the new changes. portmaster and portupgrade are no longer being actively > developed, so it is anticipated that they will stop working until somebody > fixes them (if at all). > > I last used poudriere a couple years back. > It is much more involved than portmaster > (obviously, these 2 tools are not doing the same job) > > >So no, portmaster isn't going away. But, there's no guarantee that it > will keep working. We strongly, strongly advise everyone to use poudriere > or synth to build their ports, and then plain old "pkg upgrade" to handle > updates. > > because my experience of poudriere was mixed, > I haven't used it at all on amd64. > pkg is great. And when occasionally I need > non-default options I use portmaster. > > > > >The vast majority of problems reported on this mailing list exist only in > portmaster/portupgrade, because they do not do clean builds. At this point, > portmaster should only be used by people with enough ports development > experience to understand and mitigate conflicts and various build errors. > > I agree that a dirty environement is mostly > the source of bad portmaster builds. > > However, to create the whole poudriere enviroment > to build a port a week, or maybe a month, seems > like an overkill. > > Yes, I know, it's a volunteer project, things > evolve, unless somebody steps in... > > If my recollection of poudriere is correct, > I'll need a separate ports tree? > And if I only need to build a single port > with custom settings, I'll have to start > every time from scratch? > And if I want to use this single port with > default settings with my other ports, I need > to make sure the 2 port trees are in sync. > > Sorry if I don't do poudeire justice, it's been a while... > > Anton > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I really suggest that you look at synth. It also builds in a clean environment and provides all of the advantages of poudeire for use in a single-system (or multiple identical systems) case. No jails to set up. It builds a local pkg repository and you then use pkg on everything. I don't consider it a replacement for portmaster, but in most environments it does the same job and, since it builds in a clean environment, it avoids many of the issues with other tools. It is also very well documented, so it is not too hard to understand setup and use. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 17:18:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17609B94105 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F149F70724 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F0BC9B94104; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0654B94103 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E257A70723 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4UHIIjg064178 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:18 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4UHIInd064177; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:18 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201705301718.v4UHIInd064177@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:18 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:18:19 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ math/giacxcas | 1.2.2-57 | 1.2.3-47 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ math/rpy2 | 2.7.8 | 2.8.6 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ misc/qt5ct | 0.32 | 0.33 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/mkclean | 0.8.7 | 0.8.9 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 17:19:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653CAB94248 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elferdo@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC740708EF for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elferdo@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ABC4BB94245; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5E5B94244 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elferdo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE07708E9 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elferdo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id l14so43116185ywk.1 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p0h643r31dkZ1ocEuzwRJNxhzhUo/g0L1Z8aMU2PoDY=; b=oxl5+/XAaOQJ+gFQUAIbLhnarbUlNx60lb0qhP9RGMYGVikXSmpW/GT0T3/vjx38oK z4bEluTXYtVTVFPkHhjUu1JfLSXE2WxXTwwc8XU9i0T8tYRLCN2wIGHryuzkCcLyF92z 7Oe6BZl9lJruUpSeHQZl/nv9TD2lna5/c+d1WkdDtW3mqgBpEQh6CLzbA8eLfeULnUDs SZiIxxII2HyD6Q49ga/1B0zAdYS8cHIY5atiI/dK3n/Ioumwa7GYT9sFl3+4assPedGC HWjxe8bLn3mRadWjHBomzKXoiMCmF9bS6u9zhw6E0hFQmBMT7KYrcRUySN09O2KXxF4E 5NIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p0h643r31dkZ1ocEuzwRJNxhzhUo/g0L1Z8aMU2PoDY=; b=I6k4cJoevbU5jv94J0wS60dnZ2nZTD8+4+wCN2aasJHUSoXHEPgjci0FeeLj8tnFfC vVD6gExVNGcW42JDD+/amMfPcPTAM/VyAoZiS3L120zdellUOV85a6qbma947xRKCWdS 2PsDGUOg9ZCQeK/GQta61GWBAlKQS0CRYWTPW6Eg+VOIjRfXE4hwdBITf/486+ToQ4Nq A9v9wCJlaq06/KJVr+Mi0CLncpza01qL4wkJvs1kQiHvsYllVdfCR7at751JU/IqdzCu iHLE7LaiINdDSra1Hn6UHmqmmIJkPEFPNyWMuMoVxbv+JUF0WhnHHudxyHmvnma4vnG4 XsvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDiwL5QSRXTgMi8NJjH74fs/7Qu6Pzbmdzcn0h05FURwC7fO5z1 i+Fdf1EjED/pEz/bmtA11zw35Kotjn9YeE0= X-Received: by 10.13.206.71 with SMTP id q68mr15773337ywd.99.1496164760341; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:19:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.83.128.197 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:19:19 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 19:19:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: gcc5 not building on 11-0-RELEASE To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:19:22 -0000 Hi everyone: I am trying to build lang/gcc5 using Poudriere from ports tree just updated a couple of hours ago. The port fails to link with: /usr/local/bin/ld: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/.build/./gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: Service unavailable My port options are: ---Begin OPTIONS List--- ===> The following configuration options are available for gcc5-5.4.0_2: BOOTSTRAP=off: Build using a full bootstrap GRAPHITE=on: Support for Graphite loop optimizations JAVA=off: Java platform support ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings ---End OPTIONS List--- Some more info about my system: ====>> Building lang/gcc5 build started at Tue May 30 17:59:55 CEST 2017 port directory: /usr/ports/lang/gcc5 building for: FreeBSD jaguar-default-job-01 11.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue Apr 11 08:48:40 UTC 2017 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 maintained by: gerald@FreeBSD.org Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: head/lang/gcc5/Makefile 441905 2017-05-28 09:31:40Z gerald $ Poudriere version: 3.1.14 Host OSVERSION: 1100122 Jail OSVERSION: 1100122 ---Begin Environment--- SHELL=/bin/csh STATUS=1 OPSYS=FreeBSD ARCH=amd64 SAVED_TERM=rxvt MASTERMNT=/usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/jaguar-default/ref UID=0 FORCE_PACKAGE=yes PATH=/usr/local/libexec/poudriere:.:/home/elferdo/local/bin:/usr/local/share/spark/bin:/home/elferdo/.cargo/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin _JAVA_VERSION_LIST_REGEXP=1.6\|1.7\|1.8\|1.6+\|1.7+\|1.8+ POUDRIERE_BUILD_TYPE=bulk PKGNAME=gcc5-5.4.0_2 OSREL=11.0 _OSRELEASE=11.0-RELEASE-p9 PYTHONBASE=/usr/local OLDPWD=/ _SMP_CPUS=12 PWD=/usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/jaguar-default/ref/.p/pool HAVE_COMPAT_IA32_KERN=YES MASTERNAME=jaguar-default SCRIPTPREFIX=/usr/local/share/poudriere _JAVA_VENDOR_LIST_REGEXP=openjdk\|oracle\|sun USER=root HOME=/root POUDRIERE_VERSION=3.1.14 SCRIPTPATH=/usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh CONFIGURE_MAX_CMD_LEN=262144 LIBEXECPREFIX=/usr/local/libexec/poudriere LOCALBASE=/usr/local PACKAGE_BUILDING=yes _JAVA_OS_LIST_REGEXP=native\|linux OSVERSION=1100122 ---End Environment--- Thanks for your help. Best, Fernando From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 17:23:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC730B9448C for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com", Issuer "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA5A70DFD for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from [74.134.208.22] ([74.134.208.22:39429] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-omsmta01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id E1/03-03935-78AAD295; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:23:20 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:23:01 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.6:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:23:27 -0000 > The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in the process of being implemented. These changes will break all the port-building tools. > poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly support the new changes. portmaster and portupgrade are no longer being actively developed, so it is anticipated that they will stop working until somebody fixes > them (if at all). > So no, portmaster isn't going away. But, there's no guarantee that it will keep working. We strongly, strongly advise everyone to use poudriere or synth to build their ports, and then plain old "pkg upgrade" to handle updates. > The vast majority of problems reported on this mailing list exist only in portmaster/portupgrade, because they do not do clean builds. At this point, portmaster should only be used by people with enough ports development > experience to understand and mitigate conflicts and various build errors. # Adam > Adam Weinberger I remember the days when some FreeBSD users swore by portmanager, but subsequent changes to ports framework rendered portmanager unworkable. I never used portmanager. I used portupgrade but switched to portmaster. First attempt to build synth failed on FreeBSD-current when the system crashed and rebooted as I was sleeping, so maybe not synth's fault. Now I see it might be impossible to build synth on FreeBSD-current due to some ports, including lang/gcc5-aux and lang/gcc6-aux, not building following the change to ino64; lang/gcc6-aux is a dependency of synth. But I suppose this will be patched, hopefully in the near future. I noticed that synth was ported to NetBSD along with pkg, but see nothing on NetBSD emailing lists regarding synth. Maybe synth is not catching on in NetBSD; pkgsrc users seem to be staying with pkg_* tools like in FreeBSD before the switch to pkgng. Big nuisance updating packages whose names have changed. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 17:44:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE840B950CB for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beckman@angryox.com) Received: from nog2.angryox.com (nog2.angryox.com [70.164.19.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6547726FF for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beckman@angryox.com) Received: by nog2.angryox.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A967117448A8; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:37:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=angryox.com; s=powerfulgood; t=1496165846; bh=M/XGJ931v7ETKrNImvENk+T2c5W0wFTo3a9g9pmwRCs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=IIQdLv3pUa/DiEeqpYwOHrq5w0k9Y+wM1lexqPt8f2rkZSY5Aef1eWQdioRy8YTDG fpdWNk02kQl0UBKDqIQse9WDGBI7rjzUfHvGXXp+0+44pgz7LrPbyn1OSxektmBi0h joXgYk8aEkoxdrL+RSu//CdX3Wg4D8YcQYdrBU58= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nog2.angryox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FF517448A7; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:37:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:37:26 -0400 From: Peter Beckman To: Adam Weinberger cc: mexas@bris.ac.uk, rollingbits@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201705301415.v4UEFNJv049083@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:44:28 -0000 On Tue, 30 May 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: > You don't need separate port trees. The idea is to use poudriere to build > ALL your ports. Just make a list of the ports you want, pass it to > poudriere, and it will keep everything up-to-date, rebuild things when > they need to be rebuilt, and give you a pkg repository so you can just > run "pkg install foo" or "pkg upgrade" to keep your system running. > > Even if you do use poudriere to build only a few ports, it's pretty easy. > Give your own generated packages a higher priority in > /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ and you can transparently layer your pkg repo > above the upstream repo. Where is this seemingly super easy process documented? Yes, I can read the docs and try to figure out the "best practice" workflow, or someone with amazing knowledge of poudriere (and/or synth) can write a "here's how to manage your ports" best practices for the occasional sysadmin, rather than the hard-core supporting a fleet of FreeBSD boxes admin. I've looked before and never found such a document. Something from the portupgrade or portmaster user POV, and why and how to move to the more modern and actively developed tools. > So no, you don't need separate ports trees. poudriere is happiest though > when you let it manage its own ports tree, so I prefer to just symlink > /usr/ports to it, but you can very easily use a pre-existing ports tree > with poudriere. You make it sound so easy! Maybe it is, but I haven't found it. Beckman --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman@angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 18:16:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F45B95DB5 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99F073ED5 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a245a2ba TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 30 May 2017 12:16:37 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:16:35 -0600 Cc: mexas@bris.ac.uk, rollingbits@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <24648C78-D141-4649-B2D0-D7D538C3D640@adamw.org> References: <201705301415.v4UEFNJv049083@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: Peter Beckman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 18:16:41 -0000 > On 30 May, 2017, at 11:37, Peter Beckman wrote: >=20 > On Tue, 30 May 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: >=20 >> You don't need separate port trees. The idea is to use poudriere to = build >> ALL your ports. Just make a list of the ports you want, pass it to >> poudriere, and it will keep everything up-to-date, rebuild things = when >> they need to be rebuilt, and give you a pkg repository so you can = just >> run "pkg install foo" or "pkg upgrade" to keep your system running. >>=20 >> Even if you do use poudriere to build only a few ports, it's pretty = easy. >> Give your own generated packages a higher priority in >> /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ and you can transparently layer your pkg = repo >> above the upstream repo. >=20 > Where is this seemingly super easy process documented? Yes, I can read = the > docs and try to figure out the "best practice" workflow, or someone = with > amazing knowledge of poudriere (and/or synth) can write a "here's how = to > manage your ports" best practices for the occasional sysadmin, rather = than > the hard-core supporting a fleet of FreeBSD boxes admin. >=20 > I've looked before and never found such a document. Something from the > portupgrade or portmaster user POV, and why and how to move to the = more > modern and actively developed tools. /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/local.conf: Local: { url: file:///zroot/poudriere/data/packages/JAILNAME, priority: 10 } Then, "pkg install foo" will first look for foo in your generated = packages, and fall back to the upstream pkg repository. If you use poudriere to build all your ports, just add this to turn = upstream off entirely: /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf: FreeBSD: { enabled: no } >> So no, you don't need separate ports trees. poudriere is happiest = though >> when you let it manage its own ports tree, so I prefer to just = symlink >> /usr/ports to it, but you can very easily use a pre-existing ports = tree >> with poudriere. >=20 > You make it sound so easy! Maybe it is, but I haven't found it. Check out = https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/wiki/use_system_ports_tree for some = instructions on how to use a system ports tree. Personally, I prefer to let poudriere's tree be the main one: ( Remove your old ports tree first; keep the distfiles around if you'd = like) # poudriere ports -c (Skip this if you already created a poudriere tree) # ln -s /zroot/poudriere/ports/default /usr/ports # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 18:19:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E42B95E52 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D45273FE9 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6C7DCB95E51; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C128B95E50 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F19373FE8 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::e89a:2c13:f68d:fce3] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:e89a:2c13:f68d:fce3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E7BA190C2; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:19:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: <24926F0B-3B89-4264-9ABA-EAFDE23976E5@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AFB4F603-98AB-428E-95B6-CC869A022070"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: gcc5 not building on 11-0-RELEASE Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:19:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" To: =?utf-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 18:19:40 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_AFB4F603-98AB-428E-95B6-CC869A022070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 30 May 2017, at 19:19, Fernando Herrero Carr=C3=B3n = wrote: >=20 > Hi everyone: >=20 > I am trying to build lang/gcc5 using Poudriere from ports tree just = updated > a couple of hours ago. >=20 > The port fails to link with: >=20 > /usr/local/bin/ld: > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/.build/./gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error > loading plugin: Service unavailable This is usually the message you get when static executables attempt to use dlopen(). Did you manage to link /usr/local/bin/ld as a static executable? -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_AFB4F603-98AB-428E-95B6-CC869A022070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30 iEYEARECAAYFAlktt7oACgkQsF6jCi4glqMzsQCg4luyfyG/c5ye324t+jqANWay JZUAoP0BKHPJGaWdcDc2sfttyf6bY1wQ =6jE4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_AFB4F603-98AB-428E-95B6-CC869A022070-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 19:06:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C75BD3B94 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 19:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-5.reflexion.net [208.70.210.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638A675685 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 19:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 31592 invoked from network); 30 May 2017 19:01:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.150.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 30 May 2017 19:01:34 -0000 Received: by rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.0) with SMTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 15:00:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 7814 invoked from network); 30 May 2017 19:00:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 30 May 2017 19:00:15 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (c-76-115-7-162.hsd1.or.comcast.net [76.115.7.162]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E2F3EC7B76; Tue, 30 May 2017 12:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: RE: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-Id: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:00:14 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Ports To: adamw@adamw.org, rkoberman@gmail.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 19:06:56 -0000 Adam Weinberger adamw at adamw.org wrote on Tue May 30 14:00:21 UTC 2017: > poudriere and synth are actively developed Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 > I really suggest that you look at synth. ports-mgmt/synth depends on lang/gcc6-aux which has lost its maintainer --and is broken for FreeBSD head after the ino64 changes. (synth was written in ada --which is not directly available from the normal lang/gcc* 's.) This broken status includes amd64 now. (The lang/gcc6-aux maintainer was also the author/creator.) A similar status happened for ports-mgmt/synth relative to its newly claimed aarch64 support: lang/gcc6-aux turned out to be broken such that it would not build on aarch64, which in turn stopped ports-mgmt/synth builds. . . ports-mgmt/synth -r437524 (Sun Apr 2) reported: > ports-mgmt/synth: update 1.68 -> 1.69 > > - FreeBSD/ARM* support but by the time I tried I could not build it because I could not build lang/gcc6-aux on a Pine64+ 2GB: head's system headers vs. gcc munging of copies them were no longer matched in the bootstrap process that lang/gcc6-aux uses. This is still true even without progressing to the ino64 changes in FreeBSD's head (12-CURRENT). Unfortunately ports-mgmt/synth suffers from build prerequisites that do not have a wide range of contributing maintainers or otherwise broad support. This looks like it will make ports-mgmt/synth problematical as things are. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:05:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B929BEB286 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45B21774B4 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1dFnLr-000NiS-G6 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:02:47 -0600 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:02:47 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: [tss@iki.fi: v2.2.30 released] Message-ID: <20170530200247.GA90752@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:05:15 -0000 Heads up! ----- Forwarded message from Timo Sirainen ----- Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:16:31 +0300 From: Timo Sirainen To: dovecot-news@dovecot.org, Dovecot Mailing List Subject: v2.2.30 released X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz.sig * auth: Use timing safe comparisons for everything related to passwords. It's unlikely that these could have been used for practical attacks, especially because Dovecot delays and flushes all failed authentications in 2 second intervals. Also it could have worked only when passwords were stored in plaintext in the passdb. * master process sends SIGQUIT to all running children at shutdown, which instructs them to close all the socket listeners immediately. This way restarting Dovecot should no longer fail due to some processes keeping the listeners open for a long time. + auth: Add passdb { mechanisms=none } to match separate passdb lookup + auth: Add passdb { username_filter } to use passdb only if user matches the filter. See https://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase + dsync: Add dsync_commit_msgs_interval setting. It attempts to commit the transaction after saving this many new messages. Because of the way dsync works, it may not always be possible if mails are copied or UIDs need to change. + imapc: Support imapc_features=search without ESEARCH extension. + imapc: Add imapc_features=fetch-bodystructure to pass through remote server's FETCH BODY and BODYSTRUCTURE. + imapc: Add quota=imapc backend to use GETQUOTA/GETQUOTAROOT on the remote server. + passdb imap: Add allow_invalid_cert and ssl_ca_file parameters. + If dovecot.index.cache corruption is detected, reset only the one corrupted mail instead of the whole file. + doveadm mailbox status: Add "firstsaved" field. + director_flush_socket: Add old host's up/down and vhost count as parameters - More fixes to automatically fix corruption in dovecot.list.index - dsync-server: Fix support for dsync_features=empty-header-workaround - imapc: Various bugfixes, including infinite loops on some errors - IMAP NOTIFY wasn't working for non-INBOX if IMAP client hadn't enabled modseq tracking via CONDSTORE/QRESYNC. - fts-lucene: Fix it to work again with mbox format - Some internal error messages may have contained garbage in v2.2.29 - mail-crypt: Re-encrypt when copying/moving mails and per-mailbox keys are used. Otherwise the copied mails can't be opened. - vpopmail: Fix compiling ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:06:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C624BEB31E for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 546527758C for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3682237C; Tue, 30 May 2017 15:06:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:06:30 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Mark Millard Cc: adamw@adamw.org, rkoberman@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:06:38 -0000 On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:00:14PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 > > > I really suggest that you look at synth. synth is currently only available for x86 and unless someone steps up to do the work to make the Ada compilers run on the other architectures that is certain to remain to the case. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:10:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D36BEB428 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from mail.protected-networks.net (mail.protected-networks.net [IPv6:2001:470:8d59:1::8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protected-networks.net", Issuer "Protected Networks CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB0D776E4; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from michaels-mbp.cambridge.ibm.com (bi-03pt2.bluebird.ibm.com [129.42.208.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: imb@mail.protected-networks.net) by mail.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C9E712690; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: texinfo build failure From: Michael Butler To: FreeBSD Ports Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org References: Message-ID: <1045afee-5db2-3644-7fc9-eb7ac4c92dbc@protected-networks.net> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:09:56 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:10:03 -0000 Anyone care to address this? On 5/26/17 2:41 PM, Michael Butler wrote: > Is anyone else seeing this failure to build texinfo on -CURRENT? > > cd doc && gmake TEXMF=/usr/local/share/texmf install-tex > gmake[3]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3/doc' > test -n "/usr/local/share/texmf" || (echo "TEXMF must be set." >&2; exit 1) > /bin/sh /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3/build-aux/install-sh > -d /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/texinfo > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/epsf > install -m 0644 ./texinfo.tex > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/texinfo.tex > install -m 0644 ./epsf.tex > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/epsf/epsf.tex > for f in txi-ca.tex txi-cs.tex txi-de.tex txi-en.tex txi-es.tex > txi-fr.tex txi-hu.tex txi-is.tex txi-it.tex txi-ja.tex txi-nb.tex > txi-nl.tex txi-nn.tex txi-pl.tex txi-pt.tex txi-ru.tex txi-sr.tex > txi-tr.tex txi-uk.tex; do \ > install -m 0644 ./$f > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/$f; > done > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3/doc' > gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3' > install -m 0644 /usr/ports/distfiles/texinfo/6.3/htmlxref.cnf > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texinfo > /bin/rmdir /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/lib/texinfo > rmdir: /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/lib/texinfo: No > such file or directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/texinfo > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/print/texinfo > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade20170526-91663-1k3i9m0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > UPGRADE_PORT=texinfo-6.3_1,1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=6.3_1,1 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:19:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5A5BEB83B for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com", Issuer "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ABCA77C81 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from [74.134.208.22] ([74.134.208.22:53291] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-omsmta03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id B7/5D-01815-EC3DD295; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:19:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:19:08 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.88:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:19:34 -0000 One thing I forgot to mention in my last post is that the UPDATING file looks geared to portmaster and portupgrade. Users are thus led to believe that portupgrade and portmaster are still the currently recommended tools. If the ports people want to get users to switch to synth or poudriere, updating instructions should include synth and poudriere. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:25:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D42BEBA8F for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F4C7816E for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 36d53235 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:25:03 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:25:01 -0600 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9284B642-95B4-459E-859E-DAA9C665954B@adamw.org> References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> To: Thomas Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:25:06 -0000 > On 30 May, 2017, at 14:19, Thomas Mueller wrote: >=20 >=20 > One thing I forgot to mention in my last post is that the UPDATING = file looks geared to portmaster and portupgrade. >=20 > Users are thus led to believe that portupgrade and portmaster are = still the currently recommended tools. >=20 > If the ports people want to get users to switch to synth or poudriere, = updating instructions should include synth and poudriere. There are no updating instructions for them. They do the right thing = automatically. Only portmaster needs its hand held every time something = gets updated. The only difference is that things go into a make.conf in = /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/ rather than /etc/make.conf (see = CUSTOMISATION in poudriere(8) for details), and I don't know if synth = has a special place for it too. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:37:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDD2BEBDFF for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp10.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394A978A30 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:37:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([86.199.67.222]) by mwinf5d88 with ME id SkVQ1v00S4njora03kVRwd; Tue, 30 May 2017 22:29:25 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.14] X-ME-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:29:25 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.199.67.222 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: David Marec Subject: Owncloud upgrade failure Message-ID: <91931afa-9a39-d0e9-8809-8db95e61acff@davenulle.org> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:29:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr-classic Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:37:04 -0000 Hi, After updating owncloud from the early 10.0.1 package, the upgrading process failed on the following: root:/<1>local/www/owncloud#sudo -u www php occ upgrade The process control (PCNTL) extensions are required in case you want to interrupt long running commands - see http://php.net/manual/en/book.pcntl.php ownCloud or one of the apps require upgrade - only a limited number of commands are available You may use your browser or the occ upgrade command to do the upgrade Set log level to debug Updating database schema Doctrine\DBAL\Exception\DriverException: An exception occurred while executing 'CREATE TABLE oc_account_terms (id BIGINT UNSIGNED AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL, account_id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, term VARCHAR(256) NOT NULL, INDEX account_id_index (account_id), INDEX term_index (term), PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin ENGINE = InnoDB': SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1071 Specified key was too long; max key length is 767 bytes Update failed Maintenance mode is kept active Reset log level Any clue to get this working again ? -- David Marec https://lapinbilly.eu/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:38:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E61BEBEA9 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [IPv6:2604:4500:6:2a6:ec4:7aff:feb5:1bb2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C686978AFA for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC121889D01 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:38:45 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: maurice.jlkmail.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=mailman-hosting.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= mailman-hosting.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :x-mailer:content-type:content-type:references:in-reply-to:date :date:to:from:from:subject:subject:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1496176715; x=1497040716; bh=3syiaVpl/jVjQxMMzmWA6QPGC5eWJPvxysa kGFh/+vM=; b=PiRoE1ugCoFwW3EUYb4qCYcH64RzfJRwD5/22EiDv+FOiM3fzYH NdPRFO+qvOpyGnDxGQ/KnEdKFsUQ610D3Bl+ETum1bW+tIONPWHQwSylElCU7pHM pwR4ahza5OxybIHq1rzgGXnYp32pCOq7Dx1eG9Gw6LZi759z97MNvKz4= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maurice.jlkmail.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.296 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.296 tagged_above=-9999 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.365, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=2.43, RAZOR2_CHECK=2.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id oywAgRi5xJ-J for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogwarts.fios-router.home (static-70-104-198-154.nrflva.fios.verizon.net [70.104.198.154]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31C671889B30; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1496176714.1095.44.camel@mailman-hosting.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster From: Jim Ohlstein To: Adam Weinberger , Thomas Mueller Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:38:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9284B642-95B4-459E-859E-DAA9C665954B@adamw.org> References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> <9284B642-95B4-459E-859E-DAA9C665954B@adamw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:38:47 -0000 On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 14:25 -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 30 May, 2017, at 14:19, Thomas Mueller > > wrote: > > > > > > One thing I forgot to mention in my last post is that the UPDATING > > file looks geared to portmaster and portupgrade. > > > > Users are thus led to believe that portupgrade and portmaster are > > still the currently recommended tools. > > > > If the ports people want to get users to switch to synth or > > poudriere, updating instructions should include synth and > > poudriere. > > There are no updating instructions for them. They do the right thing > automatically. Only portmaster needs its hand held every time > something gets updated. > > The only difference is that things go into a make.conf in > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/ rather than /etc/make.conf (see > CUSTOMISATION in poudriere(8) for details), and I don't know if synth > has a special place for it too. > And not only that, but poudriere reads MOVED as well. > -- Jim Ohlstein Professional Mailman Hosting https://mailman-hosting.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 20:53:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F94CBED46D for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [IPv6:2604:4500:6:2a6:ec4:7aff:feb5:1bb2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336DD79720 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554A61889D01 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:30 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: maurice.jlkmail.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=mailman-hosting.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= mailman-hosting.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :x-mailer:content-type:content-type:references:in-reply-to:date :date:to:from:from:subject:subject:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1496177604; x=1497041605; bh=VhrgKdSpeJgW5YFFvT7zN+qI4SRyBdWi79A FA0pP4Gk=; b=hIiw0oJZ+QvsHi6Lg1O88IdbaYIAOJqIfozMDwBcXW3nohCx7JE wZVa/Qsn1W0POL6aAx8+VCiEmoKncj0sUER8Fiqz5KQpieYCRBrFmDhKxwuZkgST PqgOWugYtiCecF5O1EEemBuSpqJQQTth4fU99vdPsnUIabBp5pW7AJXY= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maurice.jlkmail.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-9999 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kxJDtz14Vzyz for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogwarts.fios-router.home (static-70-104-198-154.nrflva.fios.verizon.net [70.104.198.154]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D71F1889B30; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1496177603.1095.46.camel@mailman-hosting.com> Subject: Re: [tss@iki.fi: v2.2.30 released] From: Jim Ohlstein To: The Doctor , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170530200247.GA90752@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> References: <20170530200247.GA90752@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 20:53:31 -0000 On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 14:02 -0600, The Doctor wrote: > Heads up! How about submitting a patch for the upgrade? That would be helpful. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > ----- Forwarded message from Timo Sirainen ----- > > Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:16:31 +0300 > From: Timo Sirainen > To: dovecot-news@dovecot.org, Dovecot Mailing List rg> > Subject: v2.2.30 released > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz.sig > > * auth: Use timing safe comparisons for everything related to > passwords. It's unlikely that these could have been used for > practical attacks, especially because Dovecot delays and flushes > all > failed authentications in 2 second intervals. Also it could have > worked only when passwords were stored in plaintext in the passdb. > * master process sends SIGQUIT to all running children at shutdown, > which instructs them to close all the socket listeners > immediately. > This way restarting Dovecot should no longer fail due to some > processes keeping the listeners open for a long time. > > + auth: Add passdb { mechanisms=none } to match separate passdb > lookup > + auth: Add passdb { username_filter } to use passdb only if user > matches the filter. See https://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase > + dsync: Add dsync_commit_msgs_interval setting. It attempts to > commit > the transaction after saving this many new messages. Because of > the > way dsync works, it may not always be possible if mails are copied > or UIDs need to change. > + imapc: Support imapc_features=search without ESEARCH extension. > + imapc: Add imapc_features=fetch-bodystructure to pass through > remote > server's FETCH BODY and BODYSTRUCTURE. > + imapc: Add quota=imapc backend to use GETQUOTA/GETQUOTAROOT on the > remote server. > + passdb imap: Add allow_invalid_cert and ssl_ca_file parameters. > + If dovecot.index.cache corruption is detected, reset only the one > corrupted mail instead of the whole file. > + doveadm mailbox status: Add "firstsaved" field. > + director_flush_socket: Add old host's up/down and vhost count as > parameters > - More fixes to automatically fix corruption in dovecot.list.index > - dsync-server: Fix support for dsync_features=empty-header- > workaround > - imapc: Various bugfixes, including infinite loops on some errors > - IMAP NOTIFY wasn't working for non-INBOX if IMAP client hadn't > enabled modseq tracking via CONDSTORE/QRESYNC. > - fts-lucene: Fix it to work again with mbox format > - Some internal error messages may have contained garbage in v2.2.29 > - mail-crypt: Re-encrypt when copying/moving mails and per-mailbox > keys > are used. Otherwise the copied mails can't be opened. > - vpopmail: Fix compiling > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > -- Jim Ohlstein Professional Mailman Hosting https://mailman-hosting.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 21:08:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63EEBEDD47 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thebighonker.lerctr.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B647A029 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lerctr.org; s=lerami; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=u3UbpVGTHUV4nFxmsJoYkfr+TjeH1LdoVA5BsIuK2/Q=; b=UmsbqfIHLBt5LnAEGo9OYkI3eB 7SgpQQGu/HJXvOezWiPsxeHHhSA6g35ZtXprapa3b1kwOqOeai+UHWYEv6bpUC7c7veE2DnCjNfRt zH3P9caci4KbOofR84pSfcI36d3oAjcaXU7w/nTL88Y7njk5D/zH80lqpKU1lE53SGGY=; Received: from [74.203.163.58] (port=61494 helo=lrosenman.local) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1dFoMx-0009Hn-2J; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:07:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:07:48 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman To: Jim Ohlstein Cc: The Doctor , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [tss@iki.fi: v2.2.30 released] Message-ID: <20170530210748.iahd5yrlg72a247k@lrosenman.local> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Ohlstein , The Doctor , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170530200247.GA90752@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> <1496177603.1095.46.camel@mailman-hosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1496177603.1095.46.camel@mailman-hosting.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170526 (1.8.2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:08:03 -0000 On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 04:53:23PM -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 14:02 -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > Heads up! > > How about submitting a patch for the upgrade? That would be helpful. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > Adam Weinberger (Maintainer) already updated the port in the tree. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 21:14:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8227EBEE3F5 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x244.google.com (mail-io0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A5807A9B2 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x244.google.com with SMTP id o12so122541iod.2 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:14:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=+daibEahsxgNdvVERgvaxF2gaqjGD/uWHUXXszN8DGQ=; b=YvN2jaaL/bxztWtxidnrEN/vt/TJFmhSeT+7rzic3MbFI8aI+iH5bhG2Xz6A/q4oPd S/MtV85RvH6Pt30UeVMIyL0Xn0HlBqIGvkL9fvwH3iKbTCkv4hAFBA4vWg8Ctk3eS2ns rS49PUAO1W4LfX1D2/IYToM7/tuAVShtULK6qaU3WX2gf8CBrp+oSKqJwEWEGMsTl9KP Ut5v5PHOi8+urABOzhetLEq7MYzXwEf2H9iKSrE2MdRclcNdcr1kLHgjekiFZS4pRmdZ JeBXsn3k0fc7G5a0lk8xWqPupQ8YkQxIRHFgL2MeP0Iu491Rn6RLFZ9ZO63kcRZDE3Nx aNog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+daibEahsxgNdvVERgvaxF2gaqjGD/uWHUXXszN8DGQ=; b=cr/JMUFTA4M3bkeJOxM+LP6IUpaXb7XZJSi2KbC/mwK83s5FM3MLb1qbSh4MFcug8c /EDFnC4lT8sbmzK0qEH7H5sZHqW0lfShQftfDnMfTSTKxdajjZs5AjatGNhEAQYsgA28 g0ELPYttbUJfuXuOXXKP/KEYOp9pWAFqCk+F8ftBcf0YISS9aIoSmuLAy64/YcivKBHv dMyQez/AWBRrp1ap3K+RTe3IeHgXtiRy0Kbsz9BCVBKsK8Jj/WgZLUzgySB7o4JyvlSI zmcyAiO1cH8ivbsOjObSJHNTHOuwHjDPMed9w123r6DyPRxgLoJoqtHgKHsb7B+XznZw HKrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCxh0kgyVRCJ9cknFtooUS0nslLWZdJridn1i/lB2ZbpibxImJL LTe81x8ZX3Wapr61vB0Q016CKwf+4A== X-Received: by 10.107.167.197 with SMTP id q188mr19270768ioe.110.1496178898673; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:14:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.169.201 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 14:14:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> From: Ed Maste Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:14:38 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xhMlg6nESydxqBMW97S4PWsuXfs Message-ID: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: Mark Millard Cc: Adam Weinberger , Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:14:59 -0000 On 30 May 2017 at 15:00, Mark Millard wrote: > > ports-mgmt/synth depends on lang/gcc6-aux For reference, I've created PR 219667 to track the lang/gcc6-aux issue. The pre-built bootstrap compilers need to be recreated I believe, with a trick similar to the one used for lang/ghc. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 21:31:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80822BEE884 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp06.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040AF7B32F for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([86.199.67.222]) by mwinf5d11 with ME id SlWr1v00M4njora03lWrVi; Tue, 30 May 2017 23:30:52 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.14] X-ME-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 23:30:52 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.199.67.222 Subject: Re: Owncloud upgrade failure From: David Marec To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <91931afa-9a39-d0e9-8809-8db95e61acff@davenulle.org> Message-ID: <7372580b-a8e3-48f7-fe23-9e821de1b1a8@davenulle.org> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 23:30:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <91931afa-9a39-d0e9-8809-8db95e61acff@davenulle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr-classic Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:31:01 -0000 Le 30.05.2017 à 22:29, David Marec a écrit : > CREATE TABLE oc_account_terms (id BIGINT UNSIGNED AUTO_INCREMENT NOT > NULL, account_id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, term VARCHAR(256) NOT NULL, > INDEX account_id_index (account_id), INDEX term_index (term), PRIMARY > KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin ENGINE = InnoDB' An attempt to feed this to mysql using the command line tool triggers the same error. With or without the 'ENGINE' clause. -- David Marec https://lapinbilly.eu/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 21:46:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3EBBEEC8E for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34BE17BA18 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Intersonic AB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intersonic.se; s=INTERSONICSE; t=1496180808; bh=U5RL/wm45VF+NKr8X1z9eDjfOC9xNNTyY/29lN9pq90=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bdm8FwrHaPXVyS8GCc5vx2hK6tAzMkHZdRe/ndBPBJKz3bq4pulwmgsSzKH2ESu22 6dTvYWpMsjW0PFL+/fzfY3Pd+AIs/ApeMWtosV2mVv8KGw08Dw94Fg6m9wOMdDRzwW Iw87OeWPezfPqHMSfF+HWkBkdsxIXRqX6Xjyts+k= Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 23:46:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:46:59 -0000 On 2017-05-30 22:06, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:00:14PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 >> >>> I really suggest that you look at synth. > > synth is currently only available for x86 and unless someone steps up > to do the work to make the Ada compilers run on the other architectures > that is certain to remain to the case. Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? Hope I didn't miss something. Just my $0.02... //per From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 21:53:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369E2BEEE69 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DAB07BD95 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 21:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93A6A2828; Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:53:06 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Per olof Ljungmark Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:53:09 -0000 On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss > it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? To reiterate the status: * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade tools; * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for anything other than poudriere AFAIK. If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the other tools will break. People have been wanting subpackages (aka flavors) for many years; IIUC these are parts of the changes that are coming. Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will do the work." mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 30 22:01:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DFFBEF1C1 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 22:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp06.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44EC17C56E for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 22:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([86.199.67.222]) by mwinf5d11 with ME id Sm1U1v00V4njora03m1V9N; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:01:29 +0200 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.14] X-ME-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 00:01:29 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.199.67.222 Subject: Re: Owncloud upgrade failure From: David Marec To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <91931afa-9a39-d0e9-8809-8db95e61acff@davenulle.org> Message-ID: <0724acae-84b2-10a2-6e87-3d26a0794f04@davenulle.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 00:01:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <91931afa-9a39-d0e9-8809-8db95e61acff@davenulle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:01:32 -0000 Le 30.05.2017 à 22:29, David Marec a écrit : > > Doctrine\DBAL\Exception\DriverException: An exception occurred while > executing 'CREATE TABLE oc_account_terms (id BIGINT UNSIGNED > AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL, account_id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, term > VARCHAR(256) NOT NULL, INDEX account_id_index (account_id), INDEX > term_index (term), PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE > utf8_bin ENGINE = InnoDB': > > SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1071 Specified key > was too long; max key length is 767 bytes > Update failed > Maintenance mode is kept active > Reset log level > > > Any clue to get this working again ? > As I understand the issue, the 'term' field stores too many bytes - VARCHAR(256) * UTF8 > 767 ? - to be used as a key index !? (255 seems to be ok ) -- David Marec https://lapinbilly.eu/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 00:10:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5CDBF1571 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4EE7806C1 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id u26so308679pfd.2 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:10:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=EF0C0xpqzgnyVb3H4b31qZpTcaxUitfbO+OK+EHoUWM=; b=FBnbtV8151cMUV6rTbAa/F3+SEQiCtK/LpBks/eNywBjrRUYU5WFYxNOh3hbID0lpi NXkHTA2qLv08VE7XxfOj4qzrezQfjV400NgYDzh1i24hqdi6dMIzslB4g/n9L5hpcJIn XmiwdzYGYEOi3W4L6F0LXQKKJGM5HU+1BGZ20F0i7HoQHE7BDjDzceZwASDMgJzj2k+c lXvL0h7UwioJUxg9MOuU0Egw017Lq2nwOvfvFSYTfRHh+bBEjqfDQhN/75pxafQlQ73J xd0dow8d2B2DSnlH/Mo5C6JOKx4SzznUbPkQl7etnP1F7iQdAlobBUsQ5cDj/a0UFw+o mKJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EF0C0xpqzgnyVb3H4b31qZpTcaxUitfbO+OK+EHoUWM=; b=kghckGkDNEfX7pyzj/a46zj582VKEX7CI3J+IhAC1os3kg3AHpklSO1G/R+Uq/sdpW d8/jMf69SosL8LlFW21tACMLZsioVK1tD3BXPP+D1V0yWwC4Ks8tZ10r1BtRfHhmFT9a 4NQtI4iwjDcF9GPzn5Lk0RuUz3vrd/161MRziUPrf00f6iD/a4tjrrg+JF8oz9tXUQTk 4WEFF2950beGW54FlTG0OhU+JhFENVTqB6+TtXV2UqauKeW7O6WsRtZY9oMWsz0dRac/ /SkEVWlK3dfL/DnS6LWF4n3pDCd4ApM3bOAKploHZuDKeBtQwcvKLQfuBWcirjWBycSz 4Wgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAKZJ3joDyys4LuVjlYQdwW37hv9RNifTYcFSzjL9A1UvCOcmcW JGCdpcEnkTrFBUmUShuUgg57O6gEQGzlSPA= X-Received: by 10.84.233.200 with SMTP id m8mr84410507pln.118.1496189418344; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:10:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.176.201 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 17:10:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:10:17 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HXBYbpaxmv2TvqqxzVg4KPQnlNw Message-ID: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: Mark Linimon Cc: Per olof Ljungmark , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 00:10:19 -0000 On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say > > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss > > it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? > > To reiterate the status: > > * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; > * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade tools; > * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for anything > other than poudriere AFAIK. > > If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the > other tools will break. > > People have been wanting subpackages (aka flavors) for many years; > IIUC these are parts of the changes that are coming. > > Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will do the work." > > mcl Since portmaster is still popult and since the only solutions that looks to be available in the near term are pouderiere or raw make, neither terribly viable for many, I will look into updating portmaster to deal with 'flavors'. This looks fairly straight forward and I my have the sh capability to manage it. (And then again, I am far from a great shell person, so I may well be wrong.) I have looked at Doug's script and it is pretty readable, but writing may require help. Can someone point me where to look for documentation on flavors? I have poked around the wiki, but to no avail. Unless there is documentation on what needs to be done, doing it will be hopeless and waiting for the packaging system to updated means portmaster WILL be broken for some period of time. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 00:47:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D098BF21CF for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@nordstroem.no) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3940981B59 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@nordstroem.no) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 357B9BF21CE; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333CABF21CD for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@nordstroem.no) Received: from xfd9f9f99ba9ax.mail-exchangers.nordstroem.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:19f0:5001:d8:5400:ff:fe42:5b43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9481B58 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@nordstroem.no) Received: by xfd9f9f99ba9ax.mail-exchangers.nordstroem.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9CF264F2DA; Wed, 31 May 2017 00:47:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nordstroem.no; s=xfd9f9f99ba9ax; t=1496191659; bh=guD7gGQ5yOMjfq1kmBx8jdQP1BiVY3SKzB7SLIBpAiM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=kFszahhnruL+pmU4tiOGcp0IKR8sEccp2qTZ1z4Xh2NdRqfuZ6yQEY2oQiZPNYBSA rCYgg/Dl6LXGzVOpSNIGABy6IF9l1VcXPdjSTLeozU1gnkQ7RuoVB0RlCn1uHTp3jQ LrM3H4/R1cY83M8GNRl4cEEzlkJvbiPxHaHGB4qY= Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 02:47:39 +0200 From: Erik =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nordstr=F8m?= To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Bug 218703 for graphics/blender has patches that should be commited Message-ID: <20170531004739.GA12437@xfd9f9f99ba9ax.mail-exchangers.nordstroem.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Phone: +47.98129517 User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 00:47:42 -0000 Hello, Bug 218703 for graphics/blender has patches which fixes a known problem. However graphics/blender does not have a maintainer, so no-one has commited the patches. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218703 Please commit said patches, thanks :) Erik Nordstrøm From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 05:30:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A804A92E16 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 05:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-4.reflexion.net [208.70.210.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8CC6431C for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 05:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 9881 invoked from network); 31 May 2017 05:25:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.150.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 31 May 2017 05:25:19 -0000 Received: by rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.0) with SMTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:23:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 16479 invoked from network); 31 May 2017 05:23:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 31 May 2017 05:23:59 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (c-76-115-7-162.hsd1.or.comcast.net [76.115.7.162]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E801CEC7B76; Tue, 30 May 2017 22:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:23:58 -0700 Cc: adamw@adamw.org, rkoberman@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 05:30:41 -0000 On 2017-May-30, at 1:06 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:00:14PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 >> >>> I really suggest that you look at synth. > > synth is currently only available for x86 and unless someone steps up > to do the work to make the Ada compilers run on the other architectures > that is certain to remain to the case. As I understand currently x86 and amd64 are also broken for lang/gcc6-aux if built from a recent enough head (ino64). True historically (x86/amd64) but briefly there was a little more, at least for a native aarch64 context if I understand right. (Possibly armv6 and/or armv7 too?) My understanding is that there was a short time when aarch64 also had Ada going via lang/gcc6-aux . But the problem of gcc's technique of adjusting system headers so it has separate copies (supposedly to force the headers to be language complaint) vs. FreeBSD making updates to various headers that has gcc copied and adjusted broke the bootstrap compiler's ability to do the bootstrap. (A compiler involved in the bootstrap for aarch64 is actually retrieved from elsewhere as part of the build as I remember. But it processes the headers that are as of when the bootstrap compiler was built and made its adjustments.) In other words: the overall mechanism (FreeBSD+gcc) is fragile and both sides tend to think that the other side should be the one to change how they work in order to remove the fragile status. The two parts just do not fit well and no minor variations in how the two operate can remove the mismatch. I happened to do my attempted experiment that involved building ports-mgmt/synth on aarch64 after things had broken. (I did not try armv6/v7 but there might have been a short time when there was context in that area that worked as well.) aarch64 (and any others) did not last long. Powerpc, powerpc64, mips, etc. have never attempted for Ada support as far as know. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 11:02:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B75AFD2DA for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 11:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD96273A5B for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 11:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (port-212-202-156-99.static.qsc.de [212.202.156.99]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F22D51AAF067; Wed, 31 May 2017 13:02:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster To: Adam Weinberger , mexas@bris.ac.uk Cc: rollingbits@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <28615239-b6ef-8779-4f6f-f776bb475a7c@toco-domains.de> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:13:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:02:05 -0000 On 30.05.2017 16:00, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> On 30 May, 2017, at 7:51, Anton Shterenlikht >> wrote: >> >>> when portmaster have gone away? >> >> What? WHAT? >> >> portmaster going away??? >> >> I hope not >> >> Anton > > The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned > and in the process of being implemented. These changes will break all > the port-building tools. > > poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly > support the new changes. portmaster and portupgrade are no longer > being actively developed, so it is anticipated that they will stop > working until somebody fixes them (if at all). While i'm the maintainer of portmaster i want to emphasize this. Keeping portmaster up to date is very hard. Even small changes which are double checked already broke something. Its a little frustrating. BUT: there is an ongoing attempt to rewrite portmaster with an test-driven approach to make live much easier. But this will take time. When having a decent hardware poudriere and synth are a good choice, you should definitely check out! Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 12:47:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA94B790F7 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092008015.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.8.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D74E477048 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=o4Aj8Ph0Y1QGB1Zzg5RzGndiUqkoB939utjAaXomZhQ=; b=EvVEhOeO5JZpxUMCB7EKD5QO3NyOtnp9jFEcu3agZJ29yhNKjuAsKhNtcj74qRDiUnsT2nhBk13Ow0HTAQHzTwx+Pv6tNOItZv4kTKl+oowIIRXdU9nR8x/uJt06ogIfilG7IesN98Vx1GK9Eu4gLirmGZ+sCTbh3WQiyN6os5i/4ZoFQo8+Q7wVjcFcTMJ3s7bqZJqTYIZDEXR7yYkuQPH8i+ijpH59eJ/iMbZ6fMaLmjEfspfTXIXLq1TX40gPZpYbbtaXWEXhd7sA3YS4HpIRgASJWhtg0B/5Alx6E0/LtdDFXdhD5Ps6iZT/4FeGFVERpggHp9mWmE6QZsv/fg== Received: from BY2NAM03FT009.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.57) by BY2NAM03HT047.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1101.12; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:47:35 +0000 Received: from CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (10.152.84.60) by BY2NAM03FT009.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1101.12 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:47:34 +0000 Received: from CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88f1:720f:5d4b:2f14]) by CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88f1:720f:5d4b:2f14%14]) with mapi id 15.01.1124.020; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:47:34 +0000 From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Thread-Topic: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Thread-Index: AQHS2gwTimYE7LKA30CyEXrw7DKFRg== Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:47:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:97A736112F2830FC800BF3E1FC8C2A61FF7B353324703784CB4CA519FC56FB59; UpperCasedChecksum:F6E6663AEE34B90E145DD1B058F6C01DA251B29BC06F4A206383D9927EBB4186; SizeAsReceived:8203; Count:43 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2NAM03HT047; 24:7bP1v0DOuEJvTp8LHdwZ4YaqZGeWnIDmTmTdVHCD6ZUrENPxA9i9CUkQJNXPDtVHQvy6uYukfjbwK00MuJMDIS4a0BP2AKwd6j98+qR33WM=; 7:dgVArSdExsZ16cukY6W0VOGpzs3ZJyTMYu7+D0vp+VxIZLK0h+yLsaTgBKepvexp6OnOq0EVsJkb2ctUwIo89q8mp12eegV6y8/qQNPkbKXaag9WbFjLxPnoMx86oZnoBwjTmsOwXwRtuPlIhSI1m/1pL1JHcZ5kjqszg4lAeaobNbmMBMye8Lk2E0dDU1dsde76/KPxtHEAUvBqWLSu+TU+BZiWbZknMjsaRyrtQZKLrocd98e6NNAYIJVVyKLtBhv6BE506z0kNX7WyaU35/LOHB/+kPBYhL81gLZsAk/+KRr2fxYC5eL+EfxusnAA x-incomingheadercount: 43 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2NAM03HT047; H:CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY2NAM03HT047: x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e7b57d6c-54c7-4485-5b9d-08d4a82334f5 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT047; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700073)(100105000095)(100000701073)(100105300095)(100000702073)(100105100095)(444000031); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT047; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800073)(100110000095)(100000801073)(100110300095)(100000802073)(100110100095)(100000803073)(100110400095)(100000804073)(100110200095)(100000805073)(100110500095); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT047; x-forefront-prvs: 0324C2C0E2 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29D8EF5D1B7FE04FAAB6A87635C7E340@namprd20.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 May 2017 12:47:34.2908 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2NAM03HT047 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:47:37 -0000 I would just like a clarification here. For the record, synth is broken on FreeBSD-11 and above with amd64. Is that correct? --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 13:17:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD212B79E0D for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 13:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [IPv6:2604:4500:6:2a6:ec4:7aff:feb5:1bb2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFBFC79401 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 13:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311E01889D57 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:17:45 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: maurice.jlkmail.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=mailman-hosting.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= mailman-hosting.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :x-mailer:content-type:content-type:references:in-reply-to:date :date:to:from:from:subject:subject:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1496236664; x=1497100665; bh=Di1OZL2vSyh2TzKPXHbTW4UFESix+9zKFix YsC7Rn6E=; b=PnsY16ofd7Jx+tbXjE/fhzvFeZehPhR/FfFtMzMtdB4GRaGLod4 C4/JhTaE7Ja0XLXzBqTTzU7UAguvmgFZbI2XJXzd+zHproGqaFWCNQYY+2LKvcEC 4+TGJYJlX/h+696JJnrUCeg9eQzS4QG3dvMzlYHMhSoZYIKAymSns5f8= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maurice.jlkmail.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.296 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.296 tagged_above=-9999 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.365, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=2.43, RAZOR2_CHECK=2.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id MUPwQzAHvp1m for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:17:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogwarts.fios-router.home (static-70-104-198-154.nrflva.fios.verizon.net [70.104.198.154]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA48C1889CE9 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:17:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1496236662.1196.1.camel@mailman-hosting.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] From: Jim Ohlstein To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:17:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:17:47 -0000 On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 12:47 +0000, Gerard Seibert wrote: > I would just like a clarification here. For the record, synth is > broken > on FreeBSD-11 and above with amd64. Is that correct? My understanding was that the breakage is in gcc6-aux on 12-CURRENT with 64 bit inodes. I may be wrong... -- Jim Ohlstein Professional Mailman Hosting https://mailman-hosting.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 15:34:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF4AB7CE0D for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@theweb.org.ua) Received: from oleg.opentransfer.com (oleg.opentransfer.com [91.217.144.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oleg-10.opentransfer.com", Issuer "oleg-10.opentransfer.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E5680793 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@theweb.org.ua) Received: from asus.theweb.org.ua ([10.0.8.4]) by oleg.opentransfer.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v4VFdSHG075985 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:39:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from oleg@theweb.org.ua) Received: from asus.theweb.org.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asus.theweb.org.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v4VFWiVm094500 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:32:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from oleg@theweb.org.ua) Received: (from oleg@localhost) by asus.theweb.org.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4VFWiOl094499 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:32:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from oleg@theweb.org.ua) X-Authentication-Warning: asus.theweb.org.ua: oleg set sender to oleg@theweb.org.ua using -f From: "Oleg V. Nauman" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: texinfo build failure Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 18:32:44 +0300 Message-ID: <3274188.DXfeK22HkX@asus.theweb.org.ua> Organization: Private person User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/12.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1045afee-5db2-3644-7fc9-eb7ac4c92dbc@protected-networks.net> References: <1045afee-5db2-3644-7fc9-eb7ac4c92dbc@protected-networks.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:34:06 -0000 On Tuesday 30 May 2017 16:09:56 Michael Butler wrote: > Anyone care to address this? There is some really cryptic issue. texinfo port build completed successfully after both devel/libuv and lang/perl5.24 rebuild. > > On 5/26/17 2:41 PM, Michael Butler wrote: > > Is anyone else seeing this failure to build texinfo on -CURRENT? > > > > cd doc && gmake TEXMF=/usr/local/share/texmf install-tex > > gmake[3]: Entering directory > > '/usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3/doc' test -n > > "/usr/local/share/texmf" || (echo "TEXMF must be set." >&2; exit 1) > > /bin/sh /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3/build-aux/install-sh -d > > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/texinfo > > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/eps > > f install -m 0644 ./texinfo.tex > > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/texi > > nfo.tex install -m 0644 ./epsf.tex > > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/epsf > > /epsf.tex for f in txi-ca.tex txi-cs.tex txi-de.tex txi-en.tex txi-es.tex > > txi-fr.tex txi-hu.tex txi-is.tex txi-it.tex txi-ja.tex txi-nb.tex > > txi-nl.tex txi-nn.tex txi-pl.tex txi-pt.tex txi-ru.tex txi-sr.tex > > txi-tr.tex txi-uk.tex; do \ > > > > install -m 0644 ./$f > > > > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/$f; > > done > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > > '/usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3/doc' > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3' > > install -m 0644 /usr/ports/distfiles/texinfo/6.3/htmlxref.cnf > > /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/share/texinfo > > /bin/rmdir /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/lib/texinfo > > rmdir: /usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/stage/usr/local/lib/texinfo: No > > such file or directory > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/texinfo > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/print/texinfo > > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > > /tmp/portupgrade20170526-91663-1k3i9m0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > > UPGRADE_PORT=texinfo-6.3_1,1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=6.3_1,1 make > > ** Fix the problem and try again. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 16:16:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE7EB7DA32 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [209.237.23.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B030A81AEC for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from roble.com (roble.com [209.237.23.50]) by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC25239E8F for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:11:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:16:59 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; Is there a URL (other than svnweb) where we can see a project plan for these changes? As in the recent past (i.e., since 8-REL) the FreeBSD end-user community has reason to be worried that: * popular tools that were broken in the last major ports update (to pkgng) will again not be considered part of the update, * developers and users of those tools will suffer the pain of significant refactoring (again) and their Linux-advocating co-engineers will be even more effective in reducing or eliminating FreeBSD in their environments, * little discussion and few details will (again) be available before the transition, and * it will (again) not occur exclusively on a major revision boundary. ** These concerns are not so much workload-related as much as they are planning-related. The lack of planning in previous ports/pkg updates was destructive and unnecessary. Has anything changed? Considering the delays in implementing base packages, pkg_audit that ignores base or recently deprecated ports and yet another major upgrade to the ports framework it should not need to be pointed out that our favorite OS has become far more difficult to update and maintain than any version of Linux. > * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade tools; > * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for anything > other than poudriere AFAIK. Perhaps this is because many of us have not heard of the extensive changes coming to the ports framework until now much less had the opportunity to contribute to discussion much less policies that should guide it. > If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the > other tools will break. Bottom line, these are not just tools breaking, this is FreeBSD breaking. IMO, Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 16:21:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395C7B7DB41; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from msa01b.plala.or.jp (msa01.plala.or.jp [IPv6:2400:7800:0:5010::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C29781E20; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from msc02.plala.or.jp ([172.23.12.32]) by msa01b.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20170531162155.QKZS1726.msa01b.plala.or.jp@msc02.plala.or.jp>; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:21:55 +0900 Received: from localhost ([2400:7800:4d3a:6100:5e51:4fff:fe11:73f3]) by msc02.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20170531162155.QOVC2954.msc02.plala.or.jp@localhost>; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:21:55 +0900 Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 01:21:46 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170601.012146.413650928099698078.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg error 'alphasort' From: Masachika ISHIZUKA In-Reply-To: <1116168837.2488786.1496080764980@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1116168837.2488786.1496080764980.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1116168837.2488786.1496080764980@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VirusScan: Outbound; msa01m; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:21:55 +0900 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:21:59 -0000 Hi. I was using 12-current r318249 and did 'pkg upgrade', and could not start xorg with alphasort error. After updating r319315, xorg works again. -- Masachika ISHIZUKA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 16:43:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CF0B7E38D for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM05-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam05olkn082d.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe50::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA7E82DA5 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=bo6yzFYH+ePWG6uR47yqSdXGH14GBGPqtiHmF3/iXmY=; b=s0/DwvDmu+v5otBuz+Zb1aNQ7l4AqQDGYxQjIGdFjpErXfQLdeLEUIIqaTENkB7w1/HXw/5NiFy9lfcTsoUzwGZkOvx/a4SUnFT769LlbGifi9E8vU69S1H+AIlL8UWyoMae8AbRs0VtCmONPHf66KRCJaY9LQGvGAt9xzb+YNcIHwq/YocGDU4DO5DOFTqTTSbpvonNBrbyWbzHjCgGplkNONObiqvejMv2lcfiXdJ3GdJmNtyPoQJg8kpW9/PrFauFrLjgpRxo1wZYSpKAzuAmtp+yvGBnOTRorSDGQkR0sZfJSEtudg5RA7MMft85mA1dPLHKSui9U4R+56fZGA== Received: from DM3NAM05FT007.eop-nam05.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.98.57) by DM3NAM05HT046.eop-nam05.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.98.235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1075.12; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:43:09 +0000 Received: from CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (10.152.98.58) by DM3NAM05FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.98.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1075.12 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:43:08 +0000 Received: from CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88f1:720f:5d4b:2f14]) by CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88f1:720f:5d4b:2f14%14]) with mapi id 15.01.1124.020; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:43:08 +0000 From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Thread-Topic: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Thread-Index: AQHS2iz7udOP/xw1KkKDBDHBBB7yRw== Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:43:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:3E8F452485CB7C7DEA0B583D63FCE3D6045C8F0589116058C315DE12ADBACF2D; UpperCasedChecksum:A9536F11567A310BE5656D5378AF7571B29B48982989BDC9C93D9CD09B286AEF; SizeAsReceived:8101; Count:43 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM3NAM05HT046; 24:5Rdh0GKnkY9HKPQZmc8vR59sDe6qzGMWJQPNXxYOx5b+9M6aRd14wFcbf1dPxMPPRmxMnfGE59WC559y8pAON65MDGEa1ql+eQvics8b0gY=; 7:DYf6C9PJ0bUVky7QgLwVr5KgCNCCG3s17wuLFjCg45O6NizmemCQCgxlRkEUt7VMe/I3CBqtf/hXujXUs1v3JCHPDZsCdCT3kwRy6agrvg2sm808YwPdn1v+ezzs3TH7xmQ0+wtFNBIJwvm6oN2arpecEee7CVbe0Q1r/wJnfhnF7bT4PvJOEFD0Rak4GQOUYQgqyZFr0B16UFdQsn6/sXfaj7aL+YuvQcIOFdQGrSkof02aMDRx2JrObRetcMANJYzJOPw3EFpWtQrEM8ZcT+e8gAyVS+Z1DU3xyahBIPD/E/TzI645orrW9l9skd9C x-incomingheadercount: 43 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:DM3NAM05HT046; H:CO1PR20MB0695.namprd20.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f409b0e0-6c0c-4ae1-69b9-08d4a8441d84 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322274)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:DM3NAM05HT046; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700073)(100105000095)(100000701073)(100105300095)(100000702073)(100105100095)(444000031); SRVR:DM3NAM05HT046; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800073)(100110000095)(100000801073)(100110300095)(100000802073)(100110100095)(100000803073)(100110400095)(100000804073)(100110200095)(100000805073)(100110500095); SRVR:DM3NAM05HT046; x-forefront-prvs: 0324C2C0E2 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <1BF3BD50BEF05F419F23064CC93675F6@namprd20.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 May 2017 16:43:08.6713 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM3NAM05HT046 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:43:25 -0000 T24gV2VkLCAzMSBNYXkgMjAxNyAwOToxMToyMyAtMDcwMCwgUm9nZXIgTWFycXVpcyBzdGF0ZWQ6 DQoNCj5NYXJrIExpbmltb24gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiAqIHNvbWUgZXh0ZW5zaXZlIGNoYW5nZXMgdG8g dGhlIHBvcnRzIGZyYW1ld29yayBhcmUgY29taW5nOyAgDQo+DQo+SXMgdGhlcmUgYSBVUkwgKG90 aGVyIHRoYW4gc3Zud2ViKSB3aGVyZSB3ZSBjYW4gc2VlIGEgcHJvamVjdCBwbGFuIGZvcg0KPnRo ZXNlIGNoYW5nZXM/ICBBcyBpbiB0aGUgcmVjZW50IHBhc3QgKGkuZS4sIHNpbmNlIDgtUkVMKSB0 aGUgRnJlZUJTRA0KPmVuZC11c2VyIGNvbW11bml0eSBoYXMgcmVhc29uIHRvIGJlIHdvcnJpZWQg dGhhdDoNCj4NCj4gICogcG9wdWxhciB0b29scyB0aGF0IHdlcmUgYnJva2VuIGluIHRoZSBsYXN0 IG1ham9yIHBvcnRzIHVwZGF0ZSAodG8NCj4gIHBrZ25nKSB3aWxsIGFnYWluIG5vdCBiZSBjb25z aWRlcmVkIHBhcnQgb2YgdGhlIHVwZGF0ZSwNCj4NCj4gICogZGV2ZWxvcGVycyBhbmQgdXNlcnMg b2YgdGhvc2UgdG9vbHMgd2lsbCBzdWZmZXIgdGhlIHBhaW4gb2YNCj4gIHNpZ25pZmljYW50IHJl ZmFjdG9yaW5nIChhZ2FpbikgYW5kIHRoZWlyIExpbnV4LWFkdm9jYXRpbmcNCj4gY28tZW5naW5l ZXJzIHdpbGwgYmUgZXZlbiBtb3JlIGVmZmVjdGl2ZSBpbiByZWR1Y2luZyBvciBlbGltaW5hdGlu Zw0KPiBGcmVlQlNEIGluIHRoZWlyIGVudmlyb25tZW50cywNCj4NCj4gICogbGl0dGxlIGRpc2N1 c3Npb24gYW5kIGZldyBkZXRhaWxzIHdpbGwgKGFnYWluKSBiZSBhdmFpbGFibGUgYmVmb3JlDQo+ ICB0aGUgdHJhbnNpdGlvbiwgYW5kDQo+DQo+ICAqIGl0IHdpbGwgKGFnYWluKSBub3Qgb2NjdXIg ZXhjbHVzaXZlbHkgb24gYSBtYWpvciByZXZpc2lvbiBib3VuZGFyeS4NCj4NCj4gICoqIFRoZXNl IGNvbmNlcm5zIGFyZSBub3Qgc28gbXVjaCB3b3JrbG9hZC1yZWxhdGVkIGFzIG11Y2ggYXMgdGhl eQ0KPiBhcmUgcGxhbm5pbmctcmVsYXRlZC4NCj4NCj5UaGUgbGFjayBvZiBwbGFubmluZyBpbiBw cmV2aW91cyBwb3J0cy9wa2cgdXBkYXRlcyB3YXMgZGVzdHJ1Y3RpdmUgYW5kDQo+dW5uZWNlc3Nh cnkuICBIYXMgYW55dGhpbmcgY2hhbmdlZD8NCj4NCj5Db25zaWRlcmluZyB0aGUgZGVsYXlzIGlu IGltcGxlbWVudGluZyBiYXNlIHBhY2thZ2VzLCBwa2dfYXVkaXQgdGhhdA0KPmlnbm9yZXMgYmFz ZSBvciByZWNlbnRseSBkZXByZWNhdGVkIHBvcnRzIGFuZCB5ZXQgYW5vdGhlciBtYWpvciB1cGdy YWRlDQo+dG8gdGhlIHBvcnRzIGZyYW1ld29yayBpdCBzaG91bGQgbm90IG5lZWQgdG8gYmUgcG9p bnRlZCBvdXQgdGhhdCBvdXINCj5mYXZvcml0ZSBPUyBoYXMgYmVjb21lIGZhciBtb3JlIGRpZmZp Y3VsdCB0byB1cGRhdGUgYW5kIG1haW50YWluIHRoYW4NCj5hbnkgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBMaW51eC4N Cj4NCj4+ICogdGhlc2Ugd2lsbCByZXF1aXJlIGxhcmdlIGNoYW5nZXMgdG8gYWxsIHRoZSBwb3J0 IHVwZ3JhZGUgdG9vbHM7DQo+PiAqIG5vIG9uZSBoYXMgc3RlcHBlZCBmb3J3YXJkcyB0byBvZmZl ciB0byBkbyB0aGUgd29yayBmb3IgYW55dGhpbmcNCj4+ICAgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBwb3VkcmllcmUg QUZBSUsuICANCj4NCj5QZXJoYXBzIHRoaXMgaXMgYmVjYXVzZSBtYW55IG9mIHVzIGhhdmUgbm90 IGhlYXJkIG9mIHRoZSBleHRlbnNpdmUNCj5jaGFuZ2VzIGNvbWluZyB0byB0aGUgcG9ydHMgZnJh bWV3b3JrIHVudGlsIG5vdyBtdWNoIGxlc3MgaGFkIHRoZQ0KPm9wcG9ydHVuaXR5IHRvIGNvbnRy aWJ1dGUgdG8gZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBtdWNoIGxlc3MgcG9saWNpZXMgdGhhdCBzaG91bGQNCj5ndWlk ZSBpdC4NCj4NCj4+IElmIG5vIG9uZSBkb2VzIHRoZSB3b3JrLCBhdCB0aGUgdGltZSB0aGUgbGFy Z2UgY2hhbmdlcyBjb21lLCB0aGUNCj4+IG90aGVyIHRvb2xzIHdpbGwgYnJlYWsuICANCj4NCj5C b3R0b20gbGluZSwgdGhlc2UgYXJlIG5vdCBqdXN0IHRvb2xzIGJyZWFraW5nLCB0aGlzIGlzIEZy ZWVCU0QNCj5icmVha2luZy4NCj4NCj5JTU8sDQo+Um9nZXINCg0KSSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGFk ZCB0aGF0IEkgYWdyZWUgd2l0aCBSb2dlciwgZXNwZWNpYWxseSB0aGUg4oCcbWFqb3INCnJldmlz aW9uIGJvdW5kYXJ54oCdIHN0YXRlbWVudC4gTWFueSB0aW1lcyBpbiB0aGUgcGFzdCwgSSBoYXZl IGRvbmUgZnJlc2gNCmluc3RhbGxzIG9mIG5ldyB2ZXJzaW9ucyBvZiBGcmVlQlNEIG9ubHkgdG8g aGF2ZSBhIHNpZ25pZmljYW50IGNoYW5nZQ0KaW4gdGhhdCB2ZXJzaW9uIG1hZGUsIGZvcmNpbmcg bWUgdG8gcmVjb21waWxlIHBvcnRzLCBldGNldGVyYS4gSSBub3cNCnNlZSB0aGF0IOKAnHN5bnRo 4oCdIGlzIGJyb2tlbiBvbiBGcmVlQlNELTEyLiBJZiBoaXN0b3J5IHJlcGVhdHMgaXRzZWxmLCAx Mg0Kd2lsbCBiZSByZWxlYXNlZCwgdGhlbiBhIHNpZ25pZmljYW50IGNoYW5nZSB0byB0aGUgcG9y dHMgc3lzdGVtDQppbml0aWF0ZWQgZm9yY2luZyBhIHJlY29tcGlsYXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIHBvcnRz LCBldGNldGVyYSB0byBnZXQg4oCcc3ludGjigJ0NCndvcmtpbmcgYWdhaW4uIEkgYW0gc3VyZSB0 aGF0IHRoZXJlIGFyZSBsb3RzIG9mIG90aGVyIHByb2dyYW1zIGluIHRoZQ0Kc2FtZSBwcmVkaWNh bWVudC4gVGhpcyBpcyBqdXN0IG5vdCBhY2NlcHRhYmxlLiBCZWZvcmUgdGhlIG5leHQgcmVsZWFz ZQ0Kb2YgRnJlZUJTRCwgYWxsIHRoZSBiYXNlIHByb2dyYW1zIHNob3VsZCBiZSB1cGRhdGVkIHRv IHRoZWlyIG5ld2VzdA0KdmVyc2lvbnMsIHRoZSDigJxkZWZhdWx04oCdIHZlcnNpb25zIG9mIOKA nHBlcmws4oCdIOKAnHB5dGhvbizigJ0gZXRjZXRlcmEgc2hvdWxkDQpiZSB1cGRhdGVkIGFzIHJl cXVpcmVkLg0KDQotLSANCkNhcm1lbA0K From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 16:51:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3835B7E51B for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9AC82FC5 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8CDF7B7E51A; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC14B7E519 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E44482FC0 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4VGpuGU021923 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4VGpu58021914; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201705311651.v4VGpu58021914@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:51:56 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ biology/phyml | 3.2.0 | v3.3.20170530 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mame | 0.166 | mame0186 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mess | 0.166 | mame0186 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/opencollada | 1.6.47 | v1.6.50 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/yaz | 5.21.1 | 5.22.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 16:58:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A34B7E604 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A744833A9 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from host-4-75.office.adestra.com (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 077BE30AC for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 16:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/077BE30AC; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:58:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gaWhp8Veos0xTRBhejIeQRTn74E9bVeSI" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:58:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --gaWhp8Veos0xTRBhejIeQRTn74E9bVeSI Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="h9uUi6XI69wxsTF7tBdvRGxpaabu3Qb6H"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] References: In-Reply-To: --h9uUi6XI69wxsTF7tBdvRGxpaabu3Qb6H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017/05/31 17:11, Roger Marquis wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: >> * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; >=20 > Is there a URL (other than svnweb) where we can see a project plan for > these changes? As in the recent past (i.e., since 8-REL) the FreeBSD > end-user community has reason to be worried that: >=20 > * popular tools that were broken in the last major ports update (to > pkgng) will again not be considered part of the update, >=20 > * developers and users of those tools will suffer the pain of > significant refactoring (again) and their Linux-advocating co-engineer= s > will be even more effective in reducing or eliminating FreeBSD in thei= r > environments, >=20 > * little discussion and few details will (again) be available before > the transition, and >=20 > * it will (again) not occur exclusively on a major revision boundary. >=20 > ** These concerns are not so much workload-related as much as they are= > planning-related. >=20 > The lack of planning in previous ports/pkg updates was destructive and > unnecessary. Has anything changed? >=20 > Considering the delays in implementing base packages, pkg_audit that > ignores base or recently deprecated ports and yet another major upgrade= > to the ports framework it should not need to be pointed out that our > favorite OS has become far more difficult to update and maintain than > any version of Linux. Core has some proposals around planning for such changes that they will be talking about during the BSDCan devsummit next week. These should also be published internally fairly soon afterwards for the benefit of people not at BSDCan. Cheers, Matthew --h9uUi6XI69wxsTF7tBdvRGxpaabu3Qb6H-- --gaWhp8Veos0xTRBhejIeQRTn74E9bVeSI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJZLvY2XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTngmYQAJ7glefUyT609NFl7L245dCG nFG9idF116b7bUgh2KsEsJlQNBZaIz2INpgQtVTxYDrXbbTGb17D+63uZsMDJE9x lLjIxCo1SukuVYFVO426kyhhUs0+iJxaTJ04RMrwzFHlWvcG+RNxxWEqaXXHJZGB ahgqdmLAbZN80HJYlsvmJkJNDzHdUsrMgz6NfC8n88jtxtlITpOCj9JYSUJ40lkl hz+GGH08NjdYlXSV1gOBpkOpMcwGsNKD5Oj+x/owZaehrnQB84XVS8kSExiKFy1V 3/tcw3XWs3ysbTsT7gq2pVXxSB7d9SuSSk/ypUnu6IbjlNnNT6yIIJMA4YdSW7B0 XOpOEmYLAbri4ulswCtz2wSYJHcU9oXWfxvfiDpj3QdFCoaU9JZxkb5NYH0g2frK awzo3oMN6T/htHYmf+JhAnzZa7fGlgrFoh5DmraxgYQhS3APzqYxEJLinZ/2QBSW RHpaUXxU2jp9qC+pxQjyPf7e31KKtgooCK6Kt0hb+xul0M//WutZJHUzprjd2GKE JKPMUx3ZyPgBK6Pkyg6ZNtAKHAhN34UA4dqL5lai4lHnm18xUcHNsdi5aPDIfUkQ RM7x4OM4E9l+qlHRGv2OGTZcYw112A/zGp/l6n0edN/hRJo/RZr9Ly+1AmVkz9Zb 8i5QVOWMLab18kl9HkJp =FrRB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gaWhp8Veos0xTRBhejIeQRTn74E9bVeSI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 17:28:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B81B7EDE3 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0357884030 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Intersonic AB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intersonic.se; s=INTERSONICSE; t=1496251720; bh=ms4ip7UPxbthUxcvVtZTSEv/vXQxOL2IlernCNNNzwA=; h=Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ElCVAmvSrJzLdPO4FTzT8MUbA6P5AHySLBANraiHm89p95ZaaUbFiRMcDOuH7y211 nBnfW/+GgZ0+FnfALWLkAgAdX8xOSMlR1c9iz+QM+rXStXiBgttdxz2lZzY5YB3qV1 9wKR85TBhvCAWQ6ABqQ8P/Fleq1UFQOR2h0dDaBY= Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> To: FreeBSD Ports From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 19:28:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:28:45 -0000 On 2017-05-31 02:10, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon > wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say > > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss > > it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? > > To reiterate the status: > > * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; > * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade tools; > * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for anything > other than poudriere AFAIK. > > If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the > other tools will break. > > People have been wanting subpackages (aka flavors) for many years; > IIUC these are parts of the changes that are coming. > > Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will do the work." > > mcl > > > Since portmaster is still popult and since the only solutions that looks > to be available in the near term are pouderiere or raw make, neither > terribly viable for many, I will look into updating portmaster to deal > with 'flavors'. This looks fairly straight forward and I my have the sh > capability to manage it. (And then again, I am far from a great shell > person, so I may well be wrong.) I have looked at Doug's script and it > is pretty readable, but writing may require help. > > Can someone point me where to look for documentation on flavors? I have > poked around the wiki, but to no avail. Unless there is documentation on > what needs to be done, doing it will be hopeless and waiting for the > packaging system to updated means portmaster WILL be broken for some > period of time. Let me just say that I would really, really appriciate if we could keep such a simple tool. Why does it suit us? Because we have a limited number of systems, and they are all different meaning that we custom build for almost every task. Portmaster makes very easy to build what we need on each host. Yes, it brakes sometimes but it is not that hard to figure out how to get around. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 17:43:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457D1B7F8FE for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C9A7187A for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v4VHhgst051470 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 31 May 2017 10:43:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v4VHhg5l051458; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:43:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 10:43:42 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Per olof Ljungmark Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170531174342.GA48852@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:43:50 -0000 On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 07:28:38PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > On 2017-05-31 02:10, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say > > > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss > > > it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? > > > > To reiterate the status: > > > > * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; > > * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade tools; > > * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for anything > > other than poudriere AFAIK. > > > > If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the > > other tools will break. > > > > People have been wanting subpackages (aka flavors) for many years; > > IIUC these are parts of the changes that are coming. > > > > Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will do the work." > > > > mcl > > > > Since portmaster is still popult and since the only solutions that looks > > to be available in the near term are pouderiere or raw make, neither > > terribly viable for many, I will look into updating portmaster to deal > > with 'flavors'. This looks fairly straight forward and I my have the sh > > capability to manage it. (And then again, I am far from a great shell > > person, so I may well be wrong.) I have looked at Doug's script and it > > is pretty readable, but writing may require help. > > > > Can someone point me where to look for documentation on flavors? I have > > poked around the wiki, but to no avail. Unless there is documentation on > > what needs to be done, doing it will be hopeless and waiting for the > > packaging system to updated means portmaster WILL be broken for some > > period of time. > > Let me just say that I would really, really appriciate if we could keep > such a simple tool. Why does it suit us? Because we have a limited > number of systems, and they are all different meaning that we custom > build for almost every task. Portmaster makes very easy to build what we > need on each host. Yes, it brakes sometimes but it is not that hard to > figure out how to get around. +1 I have one i386 system (a laptop) with 1.5 GB of memory, at any given time between 3-8 GB free diskspace, and a slow USB2 port. Poudriere and synth are simply overkill for maintaining ports for that laptop. -- Steve 20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 18:31:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25DAB826DC for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADC6E33AE for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d48c3f89 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:31:12 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:31:10 -0600 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> To: Per olof Ljungmark X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 18:31:21 -0000 > On 31 May, 2017, at 11:28, Per olof Ljungmark = wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 2017-05-31 02:10, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon > wrote: >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark = wrote: >> > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to = say >> > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would = miss >> > it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? >> To reiterate the status: >> * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; >> * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade = tools; >> * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for = anything >> other than poudriere AFAIK. >> If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the >> other tools will break. >> People have been wanting subpackages (aka flavors) for many years; >> IIUC these are parts of the changes that are coming. >> Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will do the work." >> mcl >> Since portmaster is still popult and since the only solutions that = looks to be available in the near term are pouderiere or raw make, = neither terribly viable for many, I will look into updating portmaster = to deal with 'flavors'. This looks fairly straight forward and I my have = the sh capability to manage it. (And then again, I am far from a great = shell person, so I may well be wrong.) I have looked at Doug's script = and it is pretty readable, but writing may require help. >> Can someone point me where to look for documentation on flavors? I = have poked around the wiki, but to no avail. Unless there is = documentation on what needs to be done, doing it will be hopeless and = waiting for the packaging system to updated means portmaster WILL be = broken for some period of time. >=20 > Let me just say that I would really, really appriciate if we could = keep such a simple tool. Why does it suit us? Because we have a limited = number of systems, and they are all different meaning that we custom = build for almost every task. Portmaster makes very easy to build what we = need on each host. Yes, it brakes sometimes but it is not that hard to = figure out how to get around. I want to reiterate that nobody is taking portmaster away from you. It = simply has not been actively developed for years. In all likelihood, = somebody will patch portmaster eventually. Poudriere is a safer, more = capable tool than portmaster, and it's better to migrate when there's no = immediate time pressure or breakage. The changes are not about to drop. Portmaster is not going to stop = working tomorrow. We are bringing it up now so that you have time to = consider migrating to poudriere or synth. If your system(s) and workflow = make poudriere a viable option, we want to encourage and help you to = migrate while there's no time pressure. Sending emails to this list about why you prefer portmaster doesn't = change the underlying problem, though: portmaster will only be long-term = viable if somebody actively develops it again. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 21:17:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7CBB94AD5 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 21:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org (pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org [54.186.218.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5468168B71 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 21:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) X-MHO-User: 2a5f5f36-4646-11e7-8c46-c35e37f62db1 X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 149.142.103.161 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from freeenv.ad.medctr.ucla.edu (unknown [149.142.103.161]) by outbound2.ore.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 2a5f5f36-4646-11e7-8c46-c35e37f62db1; Wed, 31 May 2017 21:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:16:00 -0700 From: Aric Gregson To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 732, Issue 4 Message-ID: <20170531141600.2ab77218@freeenv.ad.medctr.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: aorchid@mac.com Organization: Slow Children at Play Productions X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 21:17:11 -0000 > Since portmaster is still popult and since the only solutions that > looks to be available in the near term are pouderiere or raw make, > neither terribly viable for many, I will look into updating > portmaster to deal with 'flavors'. Thank you so very much for attempting this. I too am dependent upon portmaster, which 70% of the time works just fine. It is frustrating when builds fail, or in the case of rust, when it can never update properly. Despite its flaws and the lack of consistently reporting work-arounds in UPDATING, portmaster is easy to set-up and run and in combination with portsnap simplifies port management. Poudriere may work extremely well, but it remains poorly documented. I gave it a go about six months ago. To set it up I relied on 1.5 blog posts and hoped that they were accurate. In my first attempt at building my ports tree, it failed to build R. I was not able to find documentation of how to accomplish what poudriere was asking of me. It was simple to delete the jail and move back to portmaster. If it is the decision of the FreeBSD community is to ditch everything but poudriere (and maybe synth?) then a very concerted effort must be made to improve the documentation for setting up, migrating, using and debugging poudriere for the casual user, much like has been done for portmaster up until now. Thanks to everyone for their continued contributions to make FreeBSD awesome. Aric From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 21:27:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD28B94EA6; Wed, 31 May 2017 21:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2116A3F8; Wed, 31 May 2017 21:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::3531:dd34:c822:60f2] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:3531:dd34:c822:60f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37C2219190; Wed, 31 May 2017 23:27:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_66BB4097-05BE-472A-9539-F0463C3653F2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Firefox (and other Mozilla products) after ino64 Message-Id: <3FD47B4D-1C1E-485E-A305-9C4EF3FB5F74@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 23:27:16 +0200 Cc: FreeBSD Ports To: FreeBSD Current X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 21:27:33 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_66BB4097-05BE-472A-9539-F0463C3653F2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, Due to the recent ino64 update in 12.0-CURRENT, there have been some reports by Firefox port users about crashes. While I personally have not experienced these crashes, as I immediately rebuilt all my ports from scratch after the ino64 update, I think can explain why the following combination is very likely to have problems: * kernel+world after ino64 * www/firefox package from before ino64 It is because Firefox's JavaScript engine is doing tricks to get at libc structures and functions (via an FFI mechanism), and several structure layouts and offsets are hardcoded into its engine at build time. For instance, here is the place where the engine determines the offset of struct dirent's d_name field: = https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/dom/system/OSFileConstants= .cpp#l648 Further down in the file, several offsets of fields in struct stats are similarly determined: = https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/dom/system/OSFileConstants= .cpp#l677 Now, since ino64 changed quite a number of structure layouts, including struct dirent, struct stat, and others, such offsets determined in the past will no longer be valid! It is pretty likely that Firefox will attempt to access these fields, finding bogus values, or simply reading invalid memory, and crashing because of this. Or at the least, the behavior will be unstable. This also applies to other Mozilla products, such as Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and so on. These should all be rebuilt from scratch under ino64. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_66BB4097-05BE-472A-9539-F0463C3653F2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30 iEYEARECAAYFAlkvNTsACgkQsF6jCi4glqNvpwCg5eerGXuJHurTOjxZgOiFSyZt OwYAoIZgIrTUAG2vLbkDXU7w3Kuy5pIm =CvWl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_66BB4097-05BE-472A-9539-F0463C3653F2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 22:44:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271D6BD3316 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 22:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jktrigg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE2D06FB2F for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 22:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jktrigg@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 19so23926804qke.2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:44:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; bh=mX7nhUmXw0aNu9H0px0GkvvxgftWx0zQ6Od7jWz5VO8=; b=Tn8pQwWcPXyIgFrLnizf2IfGzzEfd0H6jNrR/lJkJWsiBbWj2zGudqPMYO7iDkHHVG PKs1CsAm68biFqkK3YTmb8mfUFrDjZhO0SIW1qSM7InwRy4x5icKIdN8z0+KqkQ35VZI MLcdz2cZ1f3GNIHI88pGBl6gR0V3duuk+LbNOFCzYA3dOQNIMRPgwyiU/gHHvXsZUM4I JzoAmUa/MEAYHu/sQ4M4RRhwl2jUDGZSv72ueoQ1rxZeqgKRcFUpvOMKH/rO9XzB0+AS IT9psZUOcenpOV6CdMLXntIZdj2GhXv8ec/Y1vzDF/HZuOY3wL41lQcgs32eL2jM5dac aGXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from :message-id; bh=mX7nhUmXw0aNu9H0px0GkvvxgftWx0zQ6Od7jWz5VO8=; b=MwWydKu2se56O3e1qCY0Zsi8roqtv+RkxSjORoZfKWVMaIvNuUn39I7aAMZFQG/UuT gm5NzIqK/CzTA1EkOqjGwgOccrKY1jZZ6Bl5AKeE/JRM0K1PNEPnh/J8hn23GbJUH3Yh uInCgfIHi87YcCbtBTCivdtxiNwJuxGemOkkofCxTYZv7ZEL/0+L+0HdQBEc1Yrg/eXI vO2AF7Uu6H/ykfijfw2rHqcw5ACG9DHeoqRGOWXc1SykiGIZSX1pYrW609Y3V0bM5+u/ qj8M+j+gg4NIDq/I1BPKtOKf1dkYYZMAWrVDia7lOXYvQjI18s3wOjuVdOuPh0MbysYX C3ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCT2qsBdlzPU8e9eZ3S1LUJYbbAjLlOgLm2kBviKlSoW0aPa0oQ 5oGmsoEalmX0tVUa3Ck= X-Received: by 10.55.122.133 with SMTP id v127mr29677238qkc.106.1496270677776; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.237.108.200] (c-68-33-73-40.hsd1.md.comcast.net. [68.33.73.40]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d62sm2810503qkc.45.2017.05.31.15.44.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 May 2017 15:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Jim Trigg Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 18:44:32 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman , Mark Linimon CC: Per olof Ljungmark , FreeBSD Ports ML From: Jim Trigg Message-ID: <1E02ABC1-C4B7-4947-B6FB-1C3573A76176@huiekin.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 22:44:39 -0000 If you can give me access to a development system, I'll help=2E (I only have a production server for the domains I host for a few not-for-= profit organizations, and my home server is currently out of service with a= bad power supply=2E) Jim Trigg On May 30, 2017 8:10:17 PM EDT, Kevin Oberman wrot= e: >On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon >wrote: > >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to >say >> > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss >> > it if it went=2E Are there actually plans to retire it? >> >> To reiterate the status: >> >> * some extensive changes to the ports framework are coming; >> * these will require large changes to all the port upgrade tools; >> * no one has stepped forwards to offer to do the work for anything >> other than poudriere AFAIK=2E >> >> If no one does the work, at the time the large changes come, the >> other tools will break=2E >> >> People have been wanting subpackages (aka flavors) for many years; >> IIUC these are parts of the changes that are coming=2E >> >> Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will do the work=2E" >> >> mcl > > >Since portmaster is still popult and since the only solutions that >looks to >be available in the near term are pouderiere or raw make, neither >terribly >viable for many, I will look into updating portmaster to deal with >'flavors'=2E This looks fairly straight forward and I my have the sh >capability to manage it=2E (And then again, I am far from a great shell >person, so I may well be wrong=2E) I have looked at Doug's script and it >is >pretty readable, but writing may require help=2E > >Can someone point me where to look for documentation on flavors? I have >poked around the wiki, but to no avail=2E Unless there is documentation >on >what needs to be done, doing it will be hopeless and waiting for the >packaging system to updated means portmaster WILL be broken for some >period >of time=2E >-- >Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer >E-mail: rkoberman@gmail=2Ecom >PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list >https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg" --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 31 23:57:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F81BED4D9 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 23:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from viclamta22p.bpe.bigpond.com (viclamta22p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4D3671896 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 23:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.26.4]) by viclafep22p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20170531205217.BPJY1993.viclafep22p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 06:52:17 +1000 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/83, refid=2.7.2:2017.5.31.193616:17:7.944, ip=, rules=__HAS_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NAME, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __IN_REP_TO, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __REFERENCES, __USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_400_LESS, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_300_399, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, IN_REP_TO, MSG_THREAD, __TO_REAL_NAMES, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, NO_URI_FOUND, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_P, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (9.0.019.16-1) id 5910AC9B046758D2 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 06:52:17 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4VKqGuq014279 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 06:52:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v4VKqF7F014276 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 06:52:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 06:52:15 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 23:57:58 -0000 On Wed, 31 May 2017, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Let me just say that I would really, really appriciate if we could keep > such a simple tool. Why does it suit us? Because we have a limited > number of systems, [...] And the sytems we do have can be somewhat limited; I mean, Ada, FFS? -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 00:01:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE45BED5B1 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4597719C9 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B3B7ABED5B0; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B350DBED5AF for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "saper.info", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65CE9719C7 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (saper@m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v5100wJQ045924 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:00:58 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=saper.info; s=Sep2014; t=1496275258; bh=ZiitRxkTBXmCJOmvp2ZgnYTFmKeBVEFrXlx/Ir6Ey8Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=od+5Ds7/F8DwOsbmXt0WUO9gX9k64ktm9cWZiXP2sNB2wlH9Cb8OzvOB1Ifzp26MM FoGCkKbv1clR7qIitOBt2gYpGo9qflqoobdeznQR2hIvuYc3piia5LhLbikuhV3upS 6QpH004Gwwc103lUSsPVkCGiCFPVORn0CjTkIi58= Received: from localhost (saper@localhost) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v5100wOY045921 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:00:58 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) X-Authentication-Warning: m.saper.info: saper owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:00:58 +0000 From: Marcin Cieslak To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="1563967779-2010439985-1496275258=:37923" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:01:00 -0000 --1563967779-2010439985-1496275258=:37923 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Hello, I have posted my port's local distfiles to a machine that is serving them with SSL behind the Let's Encrypt certificate (https://distfile.net). This is SSL-only. However, poudriere fails on certificate check when trying to fetch it: =================================================== ===> License EPL accepted by the user =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> ksh93-20160716 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - not found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/pkg-1.10.1.txz [ksh-test-amd64-exp-job-01] Installing pkg-1.10.1... [ksh-test-amd64-exp-job-01] Extracting pkg-1.10.1: .......... done ===> ksh93-20160716 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Returning to build of ksh93-20160716 =========================================================================== =================================================== =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> License EPL accepted by the user => INIT.2014-12-24.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /portdistfiles/ksh93. => Attempting to fetch https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz Certificate verification failed for /C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 34374329736:error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_clnt.c:1264: fetch: https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz: Authentication error => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz: Not Found => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /portdistfiles/ksh93 and try again. *** Error code 1 What is the best solution here? so I really have to add security/ca_root_nss (... and perl) as a fetch dependency? Any other solution? A quick look at bsd.sites.mk shows that we have some https-only distfile sources. Marcin Cie¶lak --1563967779-2010439985-1496275258=:37923 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s MIIOSwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIOPDCCDjgCAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADAL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwGgggqQMIIElzCCA3+gAwIBAgIOSBtqCKJEiNNcmz3JSA0w DQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwTDEgMB4GA1UECxMXR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBSb290IENB IC0gUjMxEzARBgNVBAoTCkdsb2JhbFNpZ24xEzARBgNVBAMTCkdsb2JhbFNp Z24wHhcNMTYwNjE1MDAwMDAwWhcNMjQwNjE1MDAwMDAwWjBdMQswCQYDVQQG EwJCRTEZMBcGA1UEChMQR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBudi1zYTEzMDEGA1UEAxMqR2xv YmFsU2lnbiBQZXJzb25hbFNpZ24gMSBDQSAtIFNIQTI1NiAtIEczMIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyrCba00KOKyGuwh9h+/MAcZm ZUF9OxGKA56AADHaDE08rB0WEbgm6J4XvJP3OGQ7cgHdVJu6XMZkRd6EcfjD yRrIwE6oAVWJe57co3gKk/XxvuubSZuUahrcOiv3D2qaHwva4zumubxQQI4f unEzRIJHPiNjaq0cCcZsMcp5pxsEz8aG0sr8Oh80sxKNnzPmuUETLESktfMC pQKHUGmWXLsG6sgCZOezUjDjKpPKW7l4PUt0TEBEyqLhifv9/YPn5C4o10PP daDazZPeKNif2PVQ5u0HRnkFrHh4wmmrMtY22Mse3eR01gD6rEEGWf+gdzuy EQE+ZVlNhCP4gXjdBQIDAQABo4IBZDCCAWAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMCcG A1UdJQQgMB4GCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwkwEgYDVR0T AQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUlifCwqX3HPgCenpkr2NvMtKYwrEw HwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUj/BLf6guRSSuTVD6Y5qL3uLdG7wwPgYIKwYBBQUHAQEE MjAwMC4GCCsGAQUFBzABhiJodHRwOi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20v cm9vdHIzMDYGA1UdHwQvMC0wK6ApoCeGJWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZ2xvYmFsc2ln bi5jb20vcm9vdC1yMy5jcmwwWQYDVR0gBFIwUDALBgkrBgEEAaAyASgwQQYJ KwYBBAGgMgFfMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCxh3ekjKKy RrUdfI6D1U7qUggdFLksiU+KiIqJzJG6GXcQ2KiBy2tF3+KYb0IixXMpIVli VXlcD5Vh4tiMxJ4WONMFt3f7/53gSXLf24WMwErubc+mGMzgUGE5HKC98PcK UV/5pPggQdzPxCBNeiXnLU1tCGYhPatFTDhUBGaVhBeuUCbgR9gpXJ9guqrD OVwouKvovdIeI5KEAcoAAiSL6naeLk/GbKUaBFa2RxXC17e+YyBWtWlWDEM3 1V8pUIx76lkO8IJYREhLcg/LnyoYy5wcrzI6pbX2vw1x/jR3GHSC1AEdoqbE xui2XLLlSa6y9yQNgdkPz7GTLmpwIT+dMIIF8TCCBNmgAwIBAgIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMF0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAkJFMRkwFwYDVQQK ExBHbG9iYWxTaWduIG52LXNhMTMwMQYDVQQDEypHbG9iYWxTaWduIFBlcnNv bmFsU2lnbiAxIENBIC0gU0hBMjU2IC0gRzMwHhcNMTcwNTI1MDg0NDE2WhcN MjAwNTI1MDg0NDE2WjA8MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMR8w HQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEA2sO3aQNus/oe4ZBZ4fu1Y1mzxnUYAkb4k/dw gMFc2Kd0eRoOY0AHj4rTEi/vVzzizxjLbEwXzQ9cBEAu/PqS8WsOmhZXtlfi szPDmP7ZpOwmNTWKSd9O7jHu9uTCGfEOsocQNYH2ULD1gVFkgKb8jHf+3u9d uCzh6qMomTtwLrCGEP70Lq385xUzRaD6qbOeIB99tpzgvMR6Z0GPTt4z8tLM kfdtohq5llwZ5vYnj/hJohVS9iLMQMHW4nuLj/mLZNaYE1CWJBT1rBwn5YPJ uR6811O9eAP7aX4iG8k1jkiBh+QNgGRBIK4GIdqy7IVRhA7v2OlpLYHMk4zP 9Fs3M+56QromVKBnxfzLhuYMUK6ugj9jwskNVitqlEFUeyfgvmR1jnPRp1Nd XGJllTNwGicR8wkaRj14RxfrvTZfwXs8OBODKFupqun/tNzdpOgyHMGQACss 9yv2SnLGCJvJK3rGIdRZEiUhLZH/Ct4L92dBhev+SjUqWKbHb4yIlGMgLdoh nwqatuWw7iyOeInjcinX7ghiIKDWhulUN493Fzl6kaUBtIIcrb7jzZ2pHAQT WUmuVnCTHk6NtoWB09lvuK77fw4GfxLWDFWkBQiJYPVBrmxlrkCKzrWdTMfS W9BiEC10jT1sSimUBIjDz22RkfsApeBJoAIWjiOZogILu9MCAwEAAaOCAdAw ggHMMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDCBngYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgZEwgY4wTQYIKwYB BQUHMAKGQWh0dHA6Ly9zZWN1cmUuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vY2FjZXJ0L2dz cGVyc29uYWxzaWduMXNoYTJnM29jc3AuY3J0MD0GCCsGAQUFBzABhjFodHRw Oi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vZ3NwZXJzb25hbHNpZ24xc2hhMmcz MEwGA1UdIARFMEMwQQYJKwYBBAGgMgEoMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNpZ24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAw RAYDVR0fBD0wOzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC5nbG9iYWxzaWduLmNvbS9n c3BlcnNvbmFsc2lnbjFzaGEyZzMuY3JsMBsGA1UdEQQUMBKBEHNhcGVyQHNh cGVyLmluZm8wHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMB0GA1Ud DgQWBBReBINaGUKUo7HCrIjsKLKERu6ooTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSWJ8LCpfcc +AJ6emSvY28y0pjCsTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAC0VK968ySq/6B+Kd ecjVThQOKtVXuG17Krfk0xz7OPYR/V+qZtBFm2Uc6tkUEmAmq3Tyf+SE3TTX Q58eJFq0uCTUhIY714ioJs1uVWBz8rPyJ3swkOfDaUXUxkQsBsf73VfKjUk4 kB5MTrApLYUe35NmEY3FqyyX13elhW1tp864vOKM2Git61cYoRn/bwd/z2JM Zkxwkd5JgvmM+p4Da+WO4CUsGzdrZEH8X/8NQIzWtUDIh7VEQZFX5fot/KvH Am8AajtpmNqTfMyg6LfcfJUXSFqXn/KEWu4Td62vX6Pd70dYKUZxnLwYvGqG A4Ktrp9zyrUzxLbmdaPln7CstjGCA38wggN7AgEBMG0wXTELMAkGA1UEBhMC QkUxGTAXBgNVBAoTEEdsb2JhbFNpZ24gbnYtc2ExMzAxBgNVBAMTKkdsb2Jh bFNpZ24gUGVyc29uYWxTaWduIDEgQ0EgLSBTSEEyNTYgLSBHMwIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCWCGSAFlAwQCAQUAoIHkMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE3MDYwMTAwMDA1OFowLwYJKoZIhvcN AQkEMSIEIOdA67ERMmFejtO5rRHiVoZ5P1lYE4TYAtYlrh7iuh1ZMHkGCSqG SIb3DQEJDzFsMGowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBFjALBglghkgB ZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMC AgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIC ALfnoxVe/RE0beHzPJuW53dE3Ek7uvZwSWia+TkpknFOROKNj8jQNYX4fBzy 7JtFY9VPJTjTq5PXlSf3Znm08WRnfULWjf6euwp1YJsNai9m3Q90zef507rX zn1LgvM7gRdhHg+SGDqgZjhZUmJKQ0b4pe+vH5l+reluudGD7yCxSlY25/yR Xr7gTmcOPDOLVXDgpVl6EjqPGCrA/OS0qDSRIdmuo8qlbsKvn/AhdyAGMLBk 4kmw4dzrJQpJMuTUHZbL1Ds4psC3SP87i0l946yh3UmRRVKaYFCWJes9s/WV p/57gKDV5c5Um3PB1LF+cN8gVJEzfDU7pVseVI9Ns97FKI97NAsk79LRUHF0 Ff8y/naIxKXoxJsWNDC3uK0LBaQYZL8djY+IVgg+gTvHAS6iRVCgalrkQVXT x3dAaFKnJjSLuy0Ty4gAzBzfuQWHEQoGeT34L3QeBYD3IyynCw7KyFriS4iX 9bb2bp0KfyA9LgC0h1AniKcFGcHPBqipXXST6fVROjXEx0fXQWWLCitYVQ4p BGu7fHU3PGrq0qDtAvV5ZhgCRUewJWoRdCWg0AiX1BbjvNkRAyyXOteTL9yd 1QS5fuvCC/3ULSzd1cCPrqxfvX8AZGZ8xrZ5PUuI5I08mbBtDDqcPKjPw+QB UqmZ4zTLgK6vDkphNazfKU8Y --1563967779-2010439985-1496275258=:37923-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 00:01:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358FDBED5B5; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [91.220.196.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBDE5719CD; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: from [10.9.9.127] (helo=rmmprod05.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dGDXo-0001KA-Uj; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:00:53 +0200 Received: from mail by rmmprod05.runbox with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dGDXo-00016s-Tf; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:00:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [Authenticated user (846156)] by runbox.com with http (RMM6); Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:52 GMT From: "Jeffrey Bouquet" To: "Dimitry Andric" CC: "FreeBSD Current" , "FreeBSD Ports" Subject: Re: Firefox (and other Mozilla products) after ino64 Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:00:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: RMM6 In-Reply-To: <3FD47B4D-1C1E-485E-A305-9C4EF3FB5F74@FreeBSD.org> Message-Id: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:01:02 -0000 On Wed, 31 May 2017 23:27:16 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Due to the recent ino64 update in 12.0-CURRENT, there have been some > reports by Firefox port users about crashes. While I personally have > not experienced these crashes, as I immediately rebuilt all my ports > from scratch after the ino64 update, I think can explain why the > following combination is very likely to have problems: >=20 > * kernel+world after ino64 > * www/firefox package from before ino64 >=20 > It is because Firefox's JavaScript engine is doing tricks to get at libc > structures and functions (via an FFI mechanism), and several structure > layouts and offsets are hardcoded into its engine at build time. >=20 > For instance, here is the place where the engine determines the offset > of struct dirent's d_name field: >=20 > https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/dom/system/OSFileConsta= nts.cpp#l648 >=20 > Further down in the file, several offsets of fields in struct stats are > similarly determined: >=20 > https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/dom/system/OSFileConsta= nts.cpp#l677 >=20 > Now, since ino64 changed quite a number of structure layouts, including > struct dirent, struct stat, and others, such offsets determined in the > past will no longer be valid! >=20 > It is pretty likely that Firefox will attempt to access these fields, > finding bogus values, or simply reading invalid memory, and crashing > because of this. Or at the least, the behavior will be unstable. >=20 > This also applies to other Mozilla products, such as Thunderbird, > SeaMonkey, and so on. These should all be rebuilt from scratch under > ino64. >=20 > -Dimitry What of machines where for some reason ports do not always build? [ for ins= tance,=20 ones with past workarounds for a failed installworld... ] that still are in critical use daily? And,or whe= re the system has been installed for so long without reinstall that some ports=20 segfault unless 'pkg lock' ... and not usually upgraded... and/or thus usi= ng binaries from backup...=20 Are upstream repositories to have those [ browser, email] ports? For in= stance, here iridium I cannot get to build...=20= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 00:24:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E88BEE020 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com", Issuer "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A73726B6 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from [74.134.208.22] ([74.134.208.22:47586] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-omsmta03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 70/5D-01815-5BE5F295; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:24:21 +0000 Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:23:59 +0000 Message-ID: <70.5D.01815.5BE5F295@dnvrco-omsmta03> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <1496236662.1196.1.camel@mailman-hosting.com> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.88:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:24:28 -0000 > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 12:47 +0000, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > I would just like a clarification here. For the record, synth is > > broken > > on FreeBSD-11 and above with amd64. Is that correct? > My understanding was that the breakage is in gcc6-aux on 12-CURRENT > with 64 bit inodes. > I may be wrong... > Jim Ohlstein That was my understanding too, both gcc5-aux and gcc6-aux being broken on CURRENT with 64-bit inodes. Now I feel like I can upgrade with 11.0-STABLE but not CURRENT. My recent CURRENT installation seems too unstable to use as a build host. I would rebuild 11.0-STABLE first and later use that as a host to rebuild CURRENT. I would want gcc(5 or 6)-aux not only for synth but also (gcc5) to try to cross-compile Haiku and (gcc5 or 6) to try to cross-compile a Linux toolchain. I would also want an updated FreeBSD system that ports would support as opposed to something like FreeBSD amelia 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #10 r294248: Mon Jan 18 11:28:40 UTC 2016 root@amelia:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY11NC amd64 Regarding portmaster, when something on which a lot of other ports depend is upgraded, such as a major version update of png, it takes many runs of portmaster before everything is successfully updated. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 01:25:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66377BEF1A2 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4255C74133 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 416DEBEF1A1; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E2DBEF1A0 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C4074132 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l18so37096787oig.2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:25:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EhavxaEqSLCAMxzwk+SGV2lhTf6S6UUl0jqnGO6cxzU=; b=r4qmI417xR0tx07RKk/LpoRHRHLBStpxgI9rB5FZNItmNXK9U6gJznDYhei5359P6P VnR7cRbMfj2riWRJp/SOyXAso1uaXiUxmfV3OL1H32B5nfTjsWd48v745ICVGWfsyONE yc2PlfLd6jAAcDyUuUEn61cBfubU189DAa14thKbx+BoSlHuqvozI2iBUYVisUimIu7W joofQgJQmFGtCBbKf16DzqlLopXALKp0djCzzK/Jke5fPg4KFm9LSpTnP1M4YbeoZo06 wS7IffBfOK7lyDIGb1IMkD1mqxuYLchg8fkLevB7DuiStg9SgZhOhq5zr6StEHm+plHq uK7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EhavxaEqSLCAMxzwk+SGV2lhTf6S6UUl0jqnGO6cxzU=; b=G7ZHYHMeZ/0Jj4f6oEdxltLB7eAK/K7N8QHEF9zzRLWJLqMJieH5Ms0nL/acdmk6FH pCVV49qanYphpVVFrK6Iu/HELHC+YSrCf+niGVdQqkykKISbRBbMkFz1Wu9gSUtLPMj6 Sg0lJ5qZSm1BycLl+YrdcULQowA2SBfTZW3d4kDHg1VgXmUK13JI2xddAv0Gsv4DvdHZ RcvZ0xkaRTRIx7q8CeaPV4NeFYNIk3V6vdpJIUGkoZdtaY5532oxD/tF80uIwJ73Z6h1 d5/v+OmlPNNv+Nw7CXXo55YdnbQ7c1NaI5Ui+3NAq4/syb04vGBqg60j1tV6o8S3qdmZ ivXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDWN2wUM3U+g4DbQllBmZeV+7HEx97ZC/DspVrFowQYLZ7Q+4Nx dgjo7yycgsT8K4KiOOutlLtyTX0ukx2K X-Received: by 10.202.74.142 with SMTP id x136mr11821265oia.7.1496280332098; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:25:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.134.72 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.74.134.72 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:25:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jov Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:25:31 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? To: Marcin Cieslak Cc: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 01:25:33 -0000 can you dowload the file distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz using browser such as chrome=EF=BC=9F be sure to use full chain cert file=EF=BC=8CI rember I had similar problem = and use full chain cert fixed. 2017=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=881=E6=97=A5 8:01 AM=EF=BC=8C"Marcin Cieslak" =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A Hello, I have posted my port's local distfiles to a machine that is serving them with SSL behind the Let's Encrypt certificate (https://distfile.net). This is SSL-only. However, poudriere fails on certificate check when trying to fetch it: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D> License EPL accepted by the user =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D> ksh93-20160716 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - not foun= d =3D=3D=3D> Installing existing package /packages/All/pkg-1.10.1.txz [ksh-test-amd64-exp-job-01] Installing pkg-1.10.1... [ksh-test-amd64-exp-job-01] Extracting pkg-1.10.1: .......... done =3D=3D=3D> ksh93-20160716 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D=3D=3D> Returning to build of ksh93-20160716 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D> License EPL accepted by the user =3D> INIT.2014-12-24.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /portdistfiles/ksh93. =3D> Attempting to fetch https://distfile.net/local- ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz Certificate verification failed for /C=3DUS/O=3DLet's Encrypt/CN=3DLet's En= crypt Authority X3 34374329736:error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certifi= cate verify failed:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/ openssl/ssl/s3_clnt.c:1264: fetch: https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz: Authentication error =3D> Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT. 2014-12-24.tgz: Not Found =3D> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this =3D> port manually into /portdistfiles/ksh93 and try again. *** Error code 1 What is the best solution here? so I really have to add security/ca_root_nss (... and perl) as a fetch dependency? Any other solution? A quick look at bsd.sites.mk shows that we have some https-only distfile sources. Marcin Cie=C5=9Blak From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 01:58:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DDEBF02C2 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nm22-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm22-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DCDA7500F for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 01:58:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1496282180; bh=iLy4VbIHz5U0AwQq98GhCqpdAf9/nR30mUsYIcs23T4=; h=From:Subject:To:Date:From:Subject; b=U9/UhXXwbzgCRrEK+6mVJZ7j6qIxs7W2h8poN92xRqEfn1rvcyaCip49VPuKoIJSa2M50y21aHOe8hexiYINObjwHhcsPd6+lIkR3Yso9VVclifhl7sfVYMGShMcsOJZNA9Aitp4dl8iPxctoH0BHUDoD44XZ9w33CY6eXwr64Qjau+PmoccFstp8Cj7zvBkgsP1M1zX5vooGeQN6HHDIre1fse7Aq4ou06shk2vbdCrGuHJ+KpGpEn5yIKd5oo9xwdnNtNAdhBflNrOQxhY73ZoMgENiMhdRNe5xNxchKdHWOajY+iyBFBuQV9U1TpAjP0LHt7xFtee+nwB/mn+8Q== Received: from [98.138.100.113] by nm22.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2017 01:56:20 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.115] by tm104.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2017 01:56:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp224.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2017 01:56:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 290455.76913.bm@smtp224.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: i3EMIqoVM1krAoOVOXi_yCy6phMAEDR597yOIgoxOiIc0Dn 2Tgvh4q2I5bSkJD7.I_Q9pyzl3cu8JdGv2yj.k0NMW8TujBzSx4hUxrnjJYM AyCTv7HGc6otbH8bt4o6GrzL0Q6dkKuRHcFRmtu8tphLZDquA.Gh4y7.__UI R0sdo4tWhAoarlFWcjt18z9y44e46DsAuKltoTCTuMQWkZvLFfWPUg48Yhdp bzaheYLn1.DaiB1VXr.7ycYM3xOyCVyBP3HLzseZOTuAFGGSMw.zn76dN9Vp RE.cfY9IOhxCYqukkXB59ElBTipnOSALg1I3rH5HbY9P5cxYJFvwL2ytpUbJ Zo271Ugusjow.GSHNazXj2E0eSB4WJSYcuwPRldXNBMhqcTopL7fSmNNcANS yAwx_nRBjyPAgZ5Mem4awx1IYS7SGNckoG2Cm1.oabrc8EyTGlW4oK_nj98M SzdtHX06eew.ZuZaQzoqRyJF01XcfEAFssG59uAdT6Gzt.tL1ZwQzxA_4PIi HP3Ssm.inFlNJNQTGKdsvpZ6_hjtyNtvCFGhGioK72d6. X-Yahoo-SMTP: xcjD0guswBAZaPPIbxpWwLcp9Unf From: Pedro Giffuni Subject: Problems using OpenMP To: freebsd-ports@freeBSD.org Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 20:56:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 01:58:40 -0000 Hello guys; FWIW, I tried using OpenMP in a port (hypre) and I thought the option would be something as simple as this: OPENMP_CONFIGURE_WITH= openmp OPENMP_CONFIGURE_USES= compiler:openmp Unfortunately that is not enough: ... In file included from ./_hypre_utilities.h:16: ./HYPRE_utilities.h:29:10: fatal error: 'omp.h' file not found #include ^~~~~~~ --- amg_linklist.o --- ... And the file is here: /usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd11.0/5.4.0/include/omp.h /usr/local/llvm39/lib/clang/3.9.1/include/omp.h Which is not really clean to include :(. Any suggestion? Pedro. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 02:45:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20CDBF1FC2 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870F876DA0; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v512jQkI053373 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 31 May 2017 19:45:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v512jQ2g053372; Wed, 31 May 2017 19:45:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 19:45:26 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: freebsd-ports@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problems using OpenMP Message-ID: <20170601024526.GA53333@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:45:30 -0000 On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:56:18PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > FWIW, I tried using OpenMP in a port (hypre) and I thought the option > would be something as simple as this: > > OPENMP_CONFIGURE_WITH= openmp > OPENMP_CONFIGURE_USES= compiler:openmp > > Unfortunately that is not enough: > > ... > > In file included from ./_hypre_utilities.h:16: > ./HYPRE_utilities.h:29:10: fatal error: 'omp.h' file not found > #include > ^~~~~~~ > --- amg_linklist.o --- > ... > > And the file is here: > > /usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd11.0/5.4.0/include/omp.h > /usr/local/llvm39/lib/clang/3.9.1/include/omp.h > > Which is not really clean to include :(. Any suggestion? > This is similar to the problem with having to find -Wl,-L/usr/local/... to find gfortran's shared libraries. For gfortran you can do #! /bin/sh LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$HOME/work/lib export LD_LIBRARY_PATH LD_RUN_PATH=$HOME/work/lib export LD_RUN_PATH PATH=$HOME/work/bin:$PATH gfortran $@ gcc has a C_INCLUDE_PATH environmental variable. Don't know if this works with gfortran or if there is a GFORTRAN_INCLUDE_PATH. This does not work with flang as she does not support LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_RUN_PATH. For openmp, and in particularly for the old fashion omp.h file, you'll need to add an appropriate -I/path/to/omp... stuff to your FFLAGS. You can add -I/usr/local/flang/include to /usr/local/bin/flang as it is a simple Bourne shell script. -- Steve 20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 04:47:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859F1BF539C for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 04:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c644447d.AEAAKy108pAAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZL5qb@bnc3.mailjet.com) Received: from o169.p8.mailjet.com (o169.p8.mailjet.com [87.253.233.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9A37A7B0 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 04:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c644447d.AEAAKy108pAAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZL5qb@bnc3.mailjet.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; d=waitman.net; i=waitman@waitman.net; s=mailjet; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:mime-version:from:to:subject:date:list-unsubscribe:organization: x-csa-complaints:x-mj-mid:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X6ek9f8Ss1JS7jy3XtRiuggzeSY=; b=idxyF4C8aAvI1GKx3m/+I0UPUMXTg1MZIbD/z4dJFO7TFUG3yB2e2a49b uW2nNtiDwiD4yHEvAHJW3sf+HD4YLr9qrY3vo+3viVk0gW4nNg6r5b6H2B0R fnXESeXxTpaz5XnIlnZ/WfkFR/ejgWwq3EKzB+CoBZy9BVCKu9Efpk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; q=dns; d=waitman.net; s=mailjet; h=message-id:mime-version:from:to:subject:date:list-unsubscribe:organization: x-csa-complaints:x-mj-mid:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=g86mNGX28FgUwoU7YD7WgmSe5VvKVf++oL8bwGi7ystrvwBFvVcC+bGqL UiFUhzSa40sdJa2GnYPB/2KjEd+5rgG+052NlLumFt/7TPs5e0dc+gIfUqOs 0dRJBEqYG4YGdZuaFuXWxCQBSbkC4UXe1RdYG1hyOprmX4slb+bZQM= Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-ports@freeBSD.org Subject: Sylpheed bug? Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 23:39:50 -0500 Organization: Waitman Gobble X-CSA-Complaints: whitelist-complaints@eco.de X-MJ-Mid: AEAAKy108pAAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZL5qbu-yPRk_9RhiU-KUlQ0oi7gAFoPU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 04:47:42 -0000 Rececently installed Sylpheed Port on FreeBSD-11.0, everything works unless= I press 'Get' or 'Get All' buttons at the top, if i do that it instally ki= lls everything running from /usr/local and restarts xorg. Seconds flat. May= be it's good for a bug report? I haven't done much on this machine and I do= n't think I dicked it up. But maybe I did? Muchas Gracias, --=20 Waitman Gobble +1 650 900 8557 Los Altos +1 829 946 1616 Santo Domingo +52 335 350 11741 Michoac=E1n = From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 04:50:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615BCBF548F for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 04:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nm29-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm29-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9EB7A8AD for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 04:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1496292388; bh=no4QWmMqBSzhvVQIZRbZXeZH6NYwICEGlqViMo+tScQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=aua5BydgD+isd2B2nwUlI1P7C0B+WWLLGQuQKeh86sOD0XOeb6M2ZK+fWGoBYvQMu53NzumxM/pWlN2MflyzQnV6NE2FPF8raFajWvTOqbnKAFYDTnnNQ+8vob5x2ZDVzQkZ4Ayj4TAg+9b1V9UkBFaoudae2UF7LJFKWPyz4L5ElQASY2NZ8xrJjvwt675ndzvbO6cLy8/NNEKEOC/qyj6o0tDj89gpxuEavRB+UDdvrpEfMKccuEH7+xL4kFxs3xdhNkTZGjth6Twp2NrOf0HQzRe1OEj8E8lClkisq8HeKiNOT9LPly+0wCE+/pipGX5iEuXaCR5AupAFJy3xPA== Received: from [98.138.100.102] by nm29.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2017 04:46:28 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.116] by tm101.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2017 04:46:28 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp225.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2017 04:46:28 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 971597.86377.bm@smtp225.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: BIrNWokVM1nIsluKu2lcTxJqkI6Xxom_wdm5pNzVYQ4DlJb dbIBEXzjAwSE8L.KvIxc6Q1VY.TOH7JoHojNOOgXPV_Ptj.IaGM.X5oNve34 _KaBNTFkAwT1ARThsIXSTMOh3BJrmBAJ2vheWzRjRNJGxE3YFENBOJ6sAxLp iSUktesvypBjcRK4StqVtqsu6EWWMI0OXP.GEos9pTOVLWZKHTnbxUjg_.uT u_5zbSTTiGm1sZNPnrHSnr1Y8o1JI7dpW6FdLcBxmVnyUHHUb79qOxya_Weg 16mSYFn1yBQ8iSyT56CeAi.OTS6sRna6dpnFsLbxHTxk3wYFE1yMBMbzt_P2 meHcSZdfYpjzDiw20vwzah_fY3nDAcH1OI0VLmJ9mMHU4OMpY_UboLSLY9XW CF7vhbVYIePrnTwzICemyRe4x9CiaZ6zQQ02tpWiINNc9GlBMdrXoBu3rHgY _mSpIBQWBmuwQYFKkXhTlHJ1fmI151j.wX5VstSIMeXP6sdiR4znwhIKQxBB 0s06srzY6xyb3nP7g8YLmvboNOhWPKPz8n.cpdTiZSaPc X-Yahoo-SMTP: xcjD0guswBAZaPPIbxpWwLcp9Unf Subject: Re: Problems using OpenMP To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-ports@freeBSD.org References: <20170601024526.GA53333@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Pedro Giffuni Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <6e070a28-04f2-0b06-d05e-fa78a4650c38@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 23:46:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170601024526.GA53333@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 04:50:01 -0000 On 05/31/17 21:45, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:56:18PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> FWIW, I tried using OpenMP in a port (hypre) and I thought the option >> would be something as simple as this: >> >> OPENMP_CONFIGURE_WITH= openmp >> OPENMP_CONFIGURE_USES= compiler:openmp >> >> Unfortunately that is not enough: >> >> ... >> >> In file included from ./_hypre_utilities.h:16: >> ./HYPRE_utilities.h:29:10: fatal error: 'omp.h' file not found >> #include >> ^~~~~~~ >> --- amg_linklist.o --- >> ... >> >> And the file is here: >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd11.0/5.4.0/include/omp.h >> /usr/local/llvm39/lib/clang/3.9.1/include/omp.h >> >> Which is not really clean to include :(. Any suggestion? >> > This is similar to the problem with having to find -Wl,-L/usr/local/... to > find gfortran's shared libraries. For gfortran you can do > > #! /bin/sh > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$HOME/work/lib > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH > LD_RUN_PATH=$HOME/work/lib > export LD_RUN_PATH > PATH=$HOME/work/bin:$PATH > gfortran $@ > > gcc has a C_INCLUDE_PATH environmental variable. Don't know if this > works with gfortran or if there is a GFORTRAN_INCLUDE_PATH. This is C, the fortran interface is used for external libraries. OK.. it's interesting to know that, I didn't want to include it in the CFLAGS. What I am finding is that all these packages are in early stages of OpenMP adoption and generally prefer MPI. For now I am trying to use threads whenever it is an option. > > This does not work with flang as she does not support LD_LIBRARY_PATH or > LD_RUN_PATH. For openmp, and in particularly for the old fashion omp.h > file, you'll need to add an appropriate -I/path/to/omp... stuff to your > FFLAGS. You can add -I/usr/local/flang/include to /usr/local/bin/flang > as it is a simple Bourne shell script. > The packages I am porting were created by the labs that sponsored flang so I guess they will figure it out ;). Thanks! Pedro. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 07:53:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7796BEEED9 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 07:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7233C6A4E8 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 07:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f72so28743925ite.0 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:53:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2RpzuHDaMIv1enB+j5rEjmDHEXPsJLMPyGvOeufNAxk=; b=jFA+eBTMk494SAf5VqFUdj4/WwbhFnFgtaZ9c6S6nNlxvjKIYQPiPNuQ8LTGrknl+M t/xZlZ92xwZ6y4XtjSUZ3Y7UoMPWdSIG3WPvQh7XAnfimzBRpPVMeqm8bXsxGPMMPGq8 GB1lMTzAKz+0j0DrHGbqsNZWdls5bW3FmoDVNL4u/70b0OMSjjIyyVVeqWUq+e3PvHTe ATSEIdzlnLGNm4dDaNodvCazQaV5PCCyr56OySdqntLaPYOgT9NIocH67UmG4cCX/wC5 H+n3MoC/t4gE5r0w70TaM82yg2LkDhveruofnuLKJlS65P/kj6xNJruftFuD7js6/Ql1 yZUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2RpzuHDaMIv1enB+j5rEjmDHEXPsJLMPyGvOeufNAxk=; b=IHYx/9Ide5zwxnmskusksbkcY5sTZhbcGp4y130bpL8pMHJnKAZyidG0n2CcOreXWs S3Y0hlwOxXNdGzylBPu06InL+ubFAy8vz9yvHc6sKlCK2HiVAjMfF4lry4revmU7uEz0 Hxf4pQtvVxwwq6CQaLeQBSEjRWralfSYWYv2eO//ZkAoSDAgwUXZxzeVRTQF3KRlg8Zw PRc9jK5yjgIqMj8W8x4iisc1BpPZA68VHgNcQCTRwGPGtd4YjM0vFvk8sx5WpVXKCwJ2 yxlZag23hZHatopUeumMpDf/KV0jhEmCzAnRkutOHweyEcxgaBnjYoM0/nbKxBz7BXUi vLuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCZ6tR7MJKk5mF7GKl4IzjdwpDfTqy901vr5V9CixTRuwyKg/55 sKfV49hzcGHFYKtqxpNrSYboj/1yuXoH X-Received: by 10.36.9.6 with SMTP id 6mr11822464itm.75.1496303597657; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:53:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.132.78 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:53:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:53:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sylpheed bug? To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:53:18 -0000 Hello, On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Rececently installed Sylpheed Port on FreeBSD-11.0, everything works unle= ss I press 'Get' or 'Get All' buttons at the top, if i do that it instally = kills everything running from /usr/local and restarts xorg. Seconds flat. M= aybe it's good for a bug report? I haven't done much on this machine and I = don't think I dicked it up. But maybe I did? FWIW, I run Sylpheed on my main workstation and upgrade from time to time. I haven't seen any errors recently. My workstation runs FreeBSD 10.3-stable: root@kg-core1# uname -a FreeBSD kg-core1.kg4.no 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r310083: Wed Dec 14 21:00:13 CET 2016 root@kg-core1.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and the latest version of Sylpheed from ports: root@kg-core1# pv sylp* [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 797 packages found - done] sylpheed-3.5.1_1 =3D up-to-date with port HTH --=20 Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 08:20:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAAABF0E5D; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from smtp.digiware.nl (smtp.digiware.nl [IPv6:2001:4cb8:90:ffff::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDFA06E4A1; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from router.digiware.nl (localhost.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C7A42182; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:20:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.com Received: from smtp.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by router.digiware.nl (router.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FS-2k73M_fic; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:20:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.11.152] (unknown [192.168.11.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A6CA42180; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:20:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Xorg error 'alphasort' To: Masachika ISHIZUKA , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1116168837.2488786.1496080764980.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1116168837.2488786.1496080764980@mail.yahoo.com> <20170601.012146.413650928099698078.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> From: Willem Jan Withagen Message-ID: <42c6421e-1b5d-1cc0-5d38-081b037a202e@digiware.nl> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:20:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170601.012146.413650928099698078.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 08:20:44 -0000 On 31/05/2017 18:21, Masachika ISHIZUKA wrote: > Hi. > > I was using 12-current r318249 and did 'pkg upgrade', and > could not start xorg with alphasort error. > After updating r319315, xorg works again. Right I had more or less the same with r319216. And I was going to reinstall from a snapshot, but now I'll try and move forward. --WjW From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 07:52:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D77BEEE55 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 07:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844976A4DF for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 07:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 83AF4BEEE54; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 07:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83464BEEE53 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 07:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EBD06A4DE for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 07:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (port-212-202-156-99.static.qsc.de [212.202.156.99]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9A6461AAF058; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:52:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/php71-extensions - missing php71-mssql To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: FreeBSD Ports References: <5919A4C3.7050503@quip.cz> <5a47bff3-4e53-99ac-2b07-a677f042a588@FreeBSD.org> <5919BF4A.1090003@quip.cz> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:02:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5919BF4A.1090003@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:52:49 -0000 On 15.05.2017 16:46, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote on 2017/05/15 15:00: > >>> I search the internet and didn't found any problem reports for this. >>> >>> PHP manual still shows this >>> http://php.net/manual/en/mssql.requirements.php >> >> If you read the manual this section is very important: >> This extension is not available anymore on Windows with PHP 5.3 or later. > > Yes, I know that, but the important part is "Windows". I think it was > due to some licence / patent issue. For Windows there is SQLSRV provided > by Microsoft for a long time. After some more investigation, i don't see a - lets say - practicable way. The mssql module was completely removed from PHP code. There are only some missed entries in the .gitignore and in an date parser. Of course i can try to port the PHP 5.6 mssql code to PHP 7.0. But this would be much work and i haven't a proper possibility to test or the free time for it. But i will give this some thoughts. Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 09:06:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BC7BF4DF5 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A125170567 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A08F4BF4DF3; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0460BF4DF2 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9257D70566 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v5196Ynd069558 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v5196YwF069550; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201706010906.v5196YwF069550@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:06:34 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:06:34 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/py-isort | 4.2.5 | 4.2.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/opencollada | 1.6.47 | v1.6.51 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 09:56:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A834BBF8AA0 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EBEA727A8 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from ns3.groumpf.org (unknown [78.251.129.10]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E543C5FFC8 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from valinor.groumpf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns3.groumpf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE6810E40A for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:56:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at groumpf.org Received: from ns3.groumpf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by valinor.groumpf.org (ns3.groumpf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id n1yDKqEMBJjd for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:56:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from enterprise.groumpf.org (enterprise.groumpf.org [192.168.100.11]) by ns3.groumpf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B5210E409 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:56:00 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-ports@freeBSD.org From: Xavier Subject: samba 44 and bind 911 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:55:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:56:53 -0000 Hello, I hava a build problem while upgrading samba44 : [root@numenor ~]# portupgrade -v samba44 [... building...] ===> Staging for samba44-4.4.14 ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: libarchive>=3.1.2 - found ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: py27-dnspython>=1.9.4 - found ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: py27-iso8601>=0.1.11 - found ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: talloc>=2.1.6 - found ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: tevent>=0.9.28 - found ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: tdb>=1.3.8 - found ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: ldb>=1.1.26 - found ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: bind910>=9.10.0.0 - not found ===> bind910-9.10.5 conflicts with installed package(s): bind911-9.11.1 It seems that samba44 requires bind 910 while bind 911 doesent meet the requisite bind910>=9.10.0.0 Is there another workaround than to downgrade bind911 to 910 ? TIA, Xav -- Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Engineer From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 10:10:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FD7AF8CD3 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F1A073E1D; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E96405EE; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 05:10:16 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 05:10:15 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170601101015.GA19908@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 10:10:24 -0000 On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:58:24PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Core has some proposals around planning for such changes that they will > be talking about during the BSDCan devsummit next week. These should > also be published internally fairly soon afterwards for the benefit of > people not at BSDCan. I'll look forward to seein what the conclusions are. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 10:56:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3098AF9E8B for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAEE275520 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (unknown [77.95.97.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 149C919207; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 12:56:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: <83DDFD7C-A4DB-43B7-98D4-CC107A1257CD@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_60649DDF-9FD4-4FD4-B917-1E6FBA17615B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: samba 44 and bind 911 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 12:56:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports@freeBSD.org To: Xavier References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 10:56:20 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_60649DDF-9FD4-4FD4-B917-1E6FBA17615B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 1 Jun 2017, at 11:55, Xavier wrote: > > I hava a build problem while upgrading samba44 : > > [root@numenor ~]# portupgrade -v samba44 > [... building...] > ===> Staging for samba44-4.4.14 > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: libarchive>=3.1.2 - found > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: py27-dnspython>=1.9.4 - found > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: py27-iso8601>=0.1.11 - found > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: talloc>=2.1.6 - found > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: tevent>=0.9.28 - found > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: tdb>=1.3.8 - found > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: ldb>=1.1.26 - found > ===> samba44-4.4.14 depends on package: bind910>=9.10.0.0 - not found > > ===> bind910-9.10.5 conflicts with installed package(s): > bind911-9.11.1 > > It seems that samba44 requires bind 910 while bind 911 doesent meet the > requisite bind910>=9.10.0.0 > > Is there another workaround than to downgrade bind911 to 910 ? Run "make config" in the net/samba44 directory, and select "Use bind911 as AD DC DNS server frontend". -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_60649DDF-9FD4-4FD4-B917-1E6FBA17615B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30 iEYEARECAAYFAlkv8s8ACgkQsF6jCi4glqN6IACbBf3NyCyQ/csL6g2AwDpBTxzY 388AnAy3V4T50HEIVXAfAcVQum/fbkI5 =J7YN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_60649DDF-9FD4-4FD4-B917-1E6FBA17615B-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 11:20:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD278AFA51E for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8198575D70; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.130.21] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dGO9Q-0008Tp-Sp; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:20:25 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id v51BKLS5021363 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:20:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v51BKKia021362; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:20:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:20:15 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: flz@FreeBSD.org Subject: head/sysutils/testdisk failes on 12-CURRENT amd64 Message-ID: <20170601112015.GA21324@c720-r314251> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, flz@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r314251 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.130.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 11:20:35 -0000 --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On # uname -a FreeBSD c720-r314251 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r314251: Sat Feb = 25 17:14:40 CET 2017 root@r303343-amd64:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC a= md64 sysutils/testdisk PORTVERSION=3D7.0 fails to compile when in /etc/make.conf =20 CFLAGS+=3D -DDEBUG is set. matthias --=20 Matthias Apitz, =E2=9C=89 guru@unixarea.de, =E2=8C=82 http://www.unixarea.d= e/ =E2=98=8E +49-176-38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub 8. Mai 1945: Wer nicht feiert hat den Krieg verloren. 8 de mayo de 1945: Quien no festeja perdi=C3=B3 la Guerra. May 8, 1945: Who does not celebrate lost the War. --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEXmn7rBYYViyzy/vBR8z35Hb+nREFAlkv+GgACgkQR8z35Hb+ nREqdA/+KjiS5v1KCc9MuiS+1D17wAA593yCCG08Fsi6lF168ekCj57ABksWNh+A 966tN5m/dLJUjYKdg2JT/GLncguvaMwul/cGkuaVXqHjyyLRtYBIge9LnUwNRSfH KyemODEDqbWZis/kgJMLj73jMGaJbIo37Fq7lspKLUpXuTVf3e4GZ0i5xV3vz0qF pSvGMYP+hXIzgiSeM4BYhIh00PNtaF4getxe8fxRcKkTkZQGRdlU1UR18Ll/n48U LVA3m7FhfARskQ7YTCCW8IEryNUFTgNKWtDPnQRI6XXGOXU40QFX/EGTTrRcOIM6 iCB3RNHNoD0CTA7c9XEVOfJLg0ik1XWDokjUQIYtVYcOTnJA6ApL+8EdZS2HEVMe ZSdmKvKJWbhum2uHOXsNQpBzA0Vz0eR4nKpCBTn/gIjtiU6pfc06yJQtC7av1k5a DhoU88Z4gOfyWvKEzqoDf4ffixtTH2CFglthtbK8MxVJojXq9GrZgf08hPuqjoIt QCTYe+YZNbkwzh2BuHGceOy0hWW5JMkafbR/M4HJ2I5Klj9ZiXB5c1Xo/ZVlBF6W EFSobESaromgQ6D3ZYP854KVFv0yQssiYjCCNojA3Afzrex5AHeDQa0XlmO3TvHD 256uLPHpr60ay5ch4BEU2o5gYbXiyTfMhzJA7GLPBFcHWLe0HL4= =W/7R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 12:54:51 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B72AFC5AF for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 12:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 5e016da3.AEAAK0XQjQMAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMA6S@bnc3.mailjet.com) Received: from o167.p9.mailjet.com (o167.p9.mailjet.com [87.253.234.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A7F78B50 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 12:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 5e016da3.AEAAK0XQjQMAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMA6S@bnc3.mailjet.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; d=waitman.net; i=waitman@waitman.net; s=mailjet; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:mime-version:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:list-unsubscribe: in-reply-to:mail-reply-to:organization:references:x-csa-complaints: x-mj-mid:x-sender:x-ua-local:x-ua-server:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iQC4Nv8VtOGVURzbSU8uPWrYRD0=; b=NOdUv2qnkbBhWNazVknfx7HeQUEZysyqe3cFWPABj//WWHYu2+0C3ERYh Apq9T5k9S4vtnKXBMqwbqFPuOulYgQoa/C3dIf9fTLbb3ZxR1zH4Depo/kUt RlQ96rhI0XqYSvoqhhE53e/OetLVl2Sk1G15m/81+A4B5F1S6mQKws= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; q=dns; d=waitman.net; s=mailjet; h=message-id:mime-version:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:list-unsubscribe: in-reply-to:mail-reply-to:organization:references:x-csa-complaints: x-mj-mid:x-sender:x-ua-local:x-ua-server:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=d//b16U1pjnBiBJqU/DyM6uF1qZDv5Ak6WjHCuJ40oqnrP5EqWqEQovo1 cFnqmXkoAV32L/riFkZH2PDDzJXOkbl6/m3FxYpnDPUUBsjTCBP6RjNC4aOu hYUGmADZ4oMxmt0ivXrN6RIWzvrPe1sk4UkL0qtyZf5qSIb9G2iplM= Message-Id: <5e016da3.AEAAK0XQjQMAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMA6S@mailjet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Waitman Gobble Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net To: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: Sylpheed bug? Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:54:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: Mail-Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net Organization: Waitman Gobble References: X-CSA-Complaints: whitelist-complaints@eco.de X-MJ-Mid: AEAAK0XQjQMAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMA6S-A8nHfQ2STi0lJawR8VDjgAFoPU X-Sender: waitman@waitman.net X-UA-Local: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0 X-UA-Server: Arduent/99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:54:51 -0000 On 2017-06-01 02:53, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Waitman Gobble > wrote: > >> Rececently installed Sylpheed Port on FreeBSD-11.0, everything works >> unless I press 'Get' or 'Get All' buttons at the top, if i do that it >> instally kills everything running from /usr/local and restarts xorg. >> Seconds flat. Maybe it's good for a bug report? I haven't done much on >> this machine and I don't think I dicked it up. But maybe I did? > > FWIW, I run Sylpheed on my main workstation and upgrade from time to > time. I haven't seen any errors recently. > My workstation runs FreeBSD 10.3-stable: > root@kg-core1# uname -a > FreeBSD kg-core1.kg4.no 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r310083: > Wed Dec 14 21:00:13 CET 2016 > root@kg-core1.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > and the latest version of Sylpheed from ports: > root@kg-core1# pv sylp* > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 797 packages found - done] > sylpheed-3.5.1_1 = up-to-date with port > > HTH % uname -a FreeBSD ayana.waitman.net 11.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue Apr 11 08:48:40 UTC 2017 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 % pkg info | grep syl sylpheed-3.5.1_1 "maybe" this is a log of the problem, Xorg [ 15752.020] Failed to compile VS: 0:13(43): error: `pos' undeclared 0:13(14): error: operands to arithmetic operators must be numeric 0:13(13): error: operands to arithmetic operators must be numeric [ 15752.020] Program source: #define ATLAS_DIM_INV 0.000976562500000000 attribute vec2 primitive; attribute vec2 source; varying vec2 glyph_pos; uniform vec2 fill_offset; uniform vec2 fill_size_inv; varying vec2 fill_pos; uniform vec4 v_matrix; void main() { gl_Position.xy = primitive.xy * v_matrix.xz + v_matrix.yw; gl_Position.zw = vec2(0.0,1.0); glyph_pos = source.xy * ATLAS_DIM_INV; fill_pos = (fill_offset + primitive.xy + pos) * fill_size_inv; } [ 15752.020] (EE) Fatal server error: [ 15752.020] (EE) GLSL compile failure [ 15752.020] (EE) [ 15752.020] (EE) Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. [ 15752.020] (EE) Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. [ 15752.020] (EE) [ 15752.020] (II) AIGLX: Suspending AIGLX clients for VT switch [ 15752.155] (EE) Server terminated with error (1). Closing log file. It seems this is mentioned as a bug/patched last year around August 2016 so probably this version doesn't have the fix? X.Org X Server 1.18.4 Release Date: 2016-07-19 -- Waitman Gobble From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 13:45:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA3FAFD4FC for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE65C7A332 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EBAD41AAF063; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:45:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: Adam Weinberger , Per olof Ljungmark Cc: FreeBSD Ports References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:45:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:45:48 -0000 On 31.05.2017 20:31, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> On 31 May, 2017, at 11:28, Per olof Ljungmark >> wrote: >> >> On 2017-05-31 02:10, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon >>> > wrote: On >>> Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>>> Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted >>>> to say that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I >>>> would miss it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire >>>> it? >>> To reiterate the status: * some extensive changes to the ports >>> framework are coming; * these will require large changes to all >>> the port upgrade tools; * no one has stepped forwards to offer to >>> do the work for anything other than poudriere AFAIK. If no one >>> does the work, at the time the large changes come, the other >>> tools will break. People have been wanting subpackages (aka >>> flavors) for many years; IIUC these are parts of the changes that >>> are coming. Someone needs to step forwards and say "yes, I will >>> do the work." mcl Since portmaster is still popult and since the >>> only solutions that looks to be available in the near term are >>> pouderiere or raw make, neither terribly viable for many, I will >>> look into updating portmaster to deal with 'flavors'. This looks >>> fairly straight forward and I my have the sh capability to manage >>> it. (And then again, I am far from a great shell person, so I may >>> well be wrong.) I have looked at Doug's script and it is pretty >>> readable, but writing may require help. Can someone point me >>> where to look for documentation on flavors? I have poked around >>> the wiki, but to no avail. Unless there is documentation on what >>> needs to be done, doing it will be hopeless and waiting for the >>> packaging system to updated means portmaster WILL be broken for >>> some period of time. >> >> Let me just say that I would really, really appriciate if we could >> keep such a simple tool. Why does it suit us? Because we have a >> limited number of systems, and they are all different meaning that >> we custom build for almost every task. Portmaster makes very easy >> to build what we need on each host. Yes, it brakes sometimes but it >> is not that hard to figure out how to get around. > > I want to reiterate that nobody is taking portmaster away from you. > It simply has not been actively developed for years. In all > likelihood, somebody will patch portmaster eventually. Poudriere is a > safer, more capable tool than portmaster, and it's better to migrate > when there's no immediate time pressure or breakage. > > The changes are not about to drop. Portmaster is not going to stop > working tomorrow. We are bringing it up now so that you have time to > consider migrating to poudriere or synth. If your system(s) and > workflow make poudriere a viable option, we want to encourage and > help you to migrate while there's no time pressure. > > Sending emails to this list about why you prefer portmaster doesn't > change the underlying problem, though: portmaster will only be > long-term viable if somebody actively develops it again. Just as a short note: there is a complete rewrite of portmaster ongoing. Since its a beast and everything else is very hard there is no public evidence in case of failure. ;) Until now. I'm currently try to convince all persons already got frustrated by portmaster-programming to come together and work on it. I'm also working at an decent automatic QA for it (and PHP and GitLab). Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 16:14:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9DAB7999F; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3BD380F6C; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id g15so12516331wmc.2; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:14:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PBDPnwqPqscEB3B6tjvfwQYRTKSYluqGfz2FAnTvbug=; b=BgH0AqvrYHoGWGvJLoViw2tPfED9gW4uEd5UwC6vVnIlFx1LRECQEpJdFaCtNJyAfS mrDURSWrfghZ1uOe+A8H6djb1N40O6+nWGkStc6pH5Vo70g331874ziKzl3NNnwf/L0Y zWo1Uww0Hfk+nqNcm3vtubrlUIgMQxqzlRExN//XBlii0aCX15oH9O64Yu/35vztUYNQ 1rNZAYxn6Qlp+LFS355cZ1z7vfLaYsiJLqp2DL4H4EGjr+bwT2yz4wv6pQqq1ZXGQzgf X1Vq5owP7G5LsuGjY4Plct7dAzYbsPWaRMaQcUD61XW1ZUoyWymLVHuOCMLEt4PVP9Su cQJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PBDPnwqPqscEB3B6tjvfwQYRTKSYluqGfz2FAnTvbug=; b=Qntx95M4eIhGG5xxeO8xPqIjIcmymCuWfPGagtpFh2JuYR31plsDkLgbI2efW256qY DiDz6kvO6HxI1SFzxiQnzCiyJYCIkKybUXY7SECzaWkbTJIYDKiqjDvHCCVBlmJaHiFy iNV1TqZNQr+PBpRp0j0hCBj8HWgx1o6CxTZ92HQdg+ayBb+NRThTMS87oFXFBxYQ9M3D EuZHovnBHki+oGOsD2V0SCWOj3SmZRsABeCoTDujtS8Ll3sAwr6zWtDaAfioZTqPj/yC wBTZeCY5jgsalcj2QdMZwaBuNlhiAz5cuIpPQRIPwGKPl/RoeaKwzDuo2BCPY0cd9O+D 3rGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCpwWkhy01JO0vNBrMhttGJRpsejbS0/gIuvJIEXCzTRvEvgf7N IFtOESjZTYxxCUru X-Received: by 10.28.141.136 with SMTP id p130mr2119015wmd.59.1496333667938; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.home (p4FCA6D87.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.202.109.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u198sm36183811wmd.29.2017.06.01.09.14.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:14:26 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Dimitry Andric Cc: FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Firefox (and other Mozilla products) after ino64 Message-ID: <20170601181426.63025614@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <3FD47B4D-1C1E-485E-A305-9C4EF3FB5F74@FreeBSD.org> References: <3FD47B4D-1C1E-485E-A305-9C4EF3FB5F74@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:14:30 -0000 On Wed, 31 May 2017 23:27:16 +0200 Dimitry Andric wrote: [snip] > This also applies to other Mozilla products, such as Thunderbird, > SeaMonkey, and so on. These should all be rebuilt from scratch under > ino64. > FYI Seamonkey still works after updating kernel and world to ino64. -- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 16:20:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A27EB79BA5 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF3181383 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:232:36ff:fe5c:3a87]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D529B004EC; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:20:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freedom.alkumuna.eu ([IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:62a4:4cff:fe54:b212]) (authenticated bits=0) by yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v51GKR1k015609 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:20:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:20:17 +0200 From: Matthieu Volat To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Cc: Adam Weinberger , Per olof Ljungmark , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170601182017.33c1f0f1@freedom.alkumuna.eu> In-Reply-To: <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/DB5cr0Joy0/it/WG_bR/Yca"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alkumuna.eu; s=default; t=1496334030; bh=f05ipNEvgKnj/0sydKaHDuBIkUIjExZ4URi1n8EumIU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SWcReN6g6n83mwPExuNXmG12wFsMdwHp5bRnga0RSUwvaQlYkmhis/1KkuAUUj3vLKOgJ2b8FlJU/JGQG+zW9cZDMnrcypTMWYrz49lKeYPkPTR/hJ2bIzqdP0Jz5iOfZURvNcrQjxAItuNKaiDDL/bRIAuoUsMd9X4Sk7Ubr9I= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:20:50 -0000 --Sig_/DB5cr0Joy0/it/WG_bR/Yca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:45:43 +0200 Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > [...] > Just as a short note: there is a complete rewrite of portmaster ongoing.= =20 > Since its a beast and everything else is very hard there is no public=20 > evidence in case of failure. ;) Until now. >=20 > I'm currently try to convince all persons already got frustrated by=20 > portmaster-programming to come together and work on it. I'm also working= =20 > at an decent automatic QA for it (and PHP and GitLab). > Hi and thanks, is there a name and a public repository for this initiative? --Sig_/DB5cr0Joy0/it/WG_bR/Yca Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE1xv/SVkem9252haa3yo2fFz8JX4FAlkwPsEACgkQ3yo2fFz8 JX4Z9Q//cZyffr5hV72DlZLR0D8PL//GemMkEz6olXn0CoEb17Pk60BYlXw8pj81 VhlJQvU0MY5ivh7APJkrZfvzAwXIpenRhQ5G8xfklYUixOAUxcRIafKTLwNVamfb fl0YFS4mZAAeigJaXSyKYr91IagiVtoZI+yuXY2CqKWPK5FycuWPrReGpc5o/14V x74sqnGzwM7Zo7HKyBtddUeX3fGgpj5qfIAbNfwc9urJnPXMMGVSi/I8ed9gLrvT nOgbeQcAIjcYuzoCCwgQuHx0xrizs6amGJnthzEkhsbm1O7S1TMA21/bFmbOtUcP qL/63dNpcDW/djRiFuv/+iii6EtEYe9E23Z7ycUF5mhrk5kCIOslsdWhpiCt8Yvt bbM2pD7t2alSGcEW4FK4h+lRcyd0oT14LUiq+UftO+h5W7tVgzhSr86iHEZgTdIg R9BFxF4Q02rLDuit1yzji6SHcYHL10tTv/Z6ER1oQOdQkgzsonIc9d29RAXytuZA PqC+vV0j9tNvppkdzJrweiZWU5tzwcSLRLXakc8u/fnspYEicdpiu/d/cIHhN/fI Hu32DC8Oxuhfjj1JA7WQpuNbWXETsItyoxg2AqDAL1EEbwLa8+JKEMSboLlPyrtq rvWv4ZqgdiMWGJygyrwqGqmI/lN4O4fKFyMzyqzhZC0DNQ325bI= =QnBt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DB5cr0Joy0/it/WG_bR/Yca-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 18:35:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34318B7C02E; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:35:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08558C09; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:35:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n23so34469269pfb.2; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 11:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vETjLH0C+ifmD0gKVN9ub8sILJWWiWZnUJ9OOc5H+TA=; b=GDdp+6YJGagHvQDUsk6QTk94Fbk4mWbzMOK6DrpcFvahbwHY3wj0YiI6k8U3GuD4sm D0vTG1f+XvfwNlxmpP6l+o9w70MDM74EFAzULHbjZAtm6rHosX2TYdxVuPIjNbm4ExsT W01jCwWXeXE6IYtqCVrtPQYj1QOdfIu3IKkXJAKdRmHO5MwTPJGpGUlTjoWc7FQ+Gb2K KsZBHoF/4eXOdAAktDjKQTtJUSBr/WSSI2Ymg3zUlTE605sn5Sr7RhZjC/x7IjNjYmG8 lt2dpiFMq4qKwlvZYjIvRGRY/imBNAl2pmT4uK+LMu+uKlDXbW/l8lioq4RkZbsmtsyZ oRqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vETjLH0C+ifmD0gKVN9ub8sILJWWiWZnUJ9OOc5H+TA=; b=rmqGFjUuM7A9hVevhAHZ0/RXkXxEY1QnP5A+jveaP+3ar+eIXyY9NwNt1Gw+2PBgQ0 //y2Itk5uh2vw27U7vQR6jhh9vHhZkocKCtj9oMyI+3ZRTxvraCsUYW6sSUbsLzN+Ywy Iy1MyeIJqK+d4LgqjzwbdjuopOx8h90+qPFVOiSbK8LFY3wjN/9yK4oJaJMcoMwbJiNH MFKnx8lZ/kQTOURXK1d1OzUDgHOV7EVfmzS4bHzzySLDQzr4c+eGN0u9R+XOLDLOLg7V zbGCqCvEthZDU5XARpAnCzoc7dL8ejqngTJUSjtpwPrRuIr3ki94uYOTO/bu72doxFRY ksXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCG62kurN+CMYA6GAoOMpxwqqZIMigumMFJNVz5Dx/WqFtwyeO2 JOLaJjihi9DD7JZVpv3APmtEQXeODll4 X-Received: by 10.84.224.198 with SMTP id k6mr8729460pln.148.1496342132155; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 11:35:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.168.79 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:35:31 -0700 (PDT) From: blubee blubeeme Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:35:31 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: nvidia drivers mutex lock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 18:35:33 -0000 I'm running nvidia-drivers 375.66 with a GTX 1070 on FreeBSD-Current This problem just started happening recently but, every so often my laptop screen will just blank out and then I have to power cycle to get the machine up and running again. It seems to be a problem with nvidia drivers acquiring duplicate lock. Any info on this? Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "os.lock_mtx" Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: 1st os.lock_mtx @ nvidia_os.c:841 Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: 2nd os.lock_mtx @ nvidia_os.c:841 Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: stack backtrace: Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #0 0xffffffff80ab7770 at witness_debugger+0x70 Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #1 0xffffffff80ab7663 at witness_checkorder+0xe23 Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #2 0xffffffff80a35b93 at __mtx_lock_flags+0x93 Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #3 0xffffffff82f4397b at os_acquire_spinlock+0x1b Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #4 0xffffffff82c48b15 at _nv012002rm+0x185 Jun 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20170303/nsarguments-205) Jun 2 02:29:42 blubee kernel: nvidia-modeset: Allocated GPU:0 (GPU-54a7b304-c99d-efee-0117-0ce119063cd6) @ PCI:0000:01:00.0 Best, Owen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 20:52:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69206B7E996 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3225D67ADE for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f102so43665020ioi.2 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:52:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nOYiNH79dAtccEAUjpSE6EqNIOaemTuiBxhqfsLB5+0=; b=gSNKk4+QzTv2dgTunXCq6vySkbgsVaq/GULyUjwCMxgQoVYuyO3RW6WpXL1+7W/OyH VVKPiPQA/PzdOVtHgZXPpHW9HDwtEnWCrMNhJlNMeBJzaLlg16Pkk2Jc7T6lTZ6oLcsM j5eoV59LNw2/4OOCtFKTmjb2rXEc53eHoJ9o4R9F8J4vbWttTepgmvLtnoakQFnIR+Co XnHNhlV2nzqnu8wIXLLUHuUFwNc3hGuJY30YFDD50ucEoOksdRtd4KRbmusU1offFEQ9 sEOP9nNpjf5Qsi/8hhUCFcIS0zTr+r0f8oDDC8Aqvf21snPUQ5638QqVjkJpk4sF+/du OFww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=nOYiNH79dAtccEAUjpSE6EqNIOaemTuiBxhqfsLB5+0=; b=MumetD4ZtKzYRaBbEXZWuvncfuOi4AsQKIGyu3pZiliGq9X4nHkkYaqjYsDRuYNbgN 4YvuK0mnmGHA6ovv5JZcqVLWHzUMfiikBHSdo65R6epAub035dqwx2L8goWzcHmTCCTU x0HkT5ebZZRF+xg37srYmKFTYn5TO7t6NR3wTL6XJ/NAB4eUpl0eMClNSk3lHUHcKUO5 wJRAHvPiHp1ROsl6HksVclaisEpJsCi35odPuh8CUu9iSOUG3tm5fKwW4GDQlV01qNer peyDzs6LCUDyI3bBWSA/uKq7yTCfES/4Ce/VGoETyjvpmAulbXmqCsw06fOgtE1yT/05 JY8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDb41lEGXtj21veBhALVu8dJ3aEENttUv1ehcQjm74b0Hfn2EIE jfsXjuw/Ml8jqXKMknsQMgkETwxH4g== X-Received: by 10.107.57.198 with SMTP id g189mr4284581ioa.123.1496350336242; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.132.78 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:52:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5e016da3.AEAAK0XQjQMAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMA6S@mailjet.com> References: <5e016da3.AEAAK0XQjQMAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMA6S@mailjet.com> From: Torfinn Ingolfsen Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:52:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sylpheed bug? To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 20:52:17 -0000 Hello! Some things to check: 1) is Sylpheed the only program that makes your Xorg crash? 2) which DE (Desktop Environment) are you using? I'm using Xfce 3) are any "special effects" turned on in your Xorg / DE setup? Things like Compositor, ...? 4) if "yes" in 3 - does it help if you turn off those "special effects"? 5) Are you using ports exclusively, or are you mixing ports and packages? HTH -- Torfinn From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 21:01:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB01B7EF26 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daisy.fields@guideprocenter.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57EE68A37 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daisy.fields@guideprocenter.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B4899B7EF25; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40FDB7EF24 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daisy.fields@guideprocenter.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8796A68A31 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daisy.fields@guideprocenter.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id e193so37485190pfh.0 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 14:01:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=guideprocenter-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index :content-language; bh=fOwgzLTZPxw9CrQdxzIGx3GjAO/imh4IaxpxhvNW+z0=; b=FVHn+XDsng/j4r4hMRqiyI2pmeMXoGqwOkfxBc3UIIK66Zp6BBZE82SVi5jUtGNhm7 aQjUDiKOmXhq3vzDQCNDpXYTaOeTJfgzi9evDF+18IBIjsxGs7V4LznLHnABPEdYmQRU Xdb1wFdZwjkGiPIt0GWNYlccS83lTcNnRy7IPZkJRIH0TNSQdsd2RiYooEMRyODTJ79k wCyMB3kUQAGo1/c50qCMKn9pvSRQPtZOirIiBdTKbGeFhUDFVSZzEVuKkcnUhnSYPo7Z vIZ+bx57lNVJi22HjtuCv6fe79e3jEjtEn1aXElfJ15UKpiKbbm+H4a5Zv8AwfAGjiyz T45w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=fOwgzLTZPxw9CrQdxzIGx3GjAO/imh4IaxpxhvNW+z0=; b=TW4+cK06WWz047EwBaHpMmaoLl384tqrHq1BMXO7M62T40+ABSTTRcFYdb+S3+6cPn lTzVBjHz4w6hLnd/Mx+hOX6rRV8BC65+Z5etAcskqftWSOow3M8pdUH998w0Zxb123/p /1DUpgVo/0j6kxiYjI7c3dhaUSMwIU0vjPJn/jJuiwW6Wj9UXVAl2F8zliUo2KhxxjZD TXGnOX3KI/LMp0TW8BQLj4QXPLAOP7hKkfIOMUaoDbIpqvfCmD8GD/Ul8QQ+HLua2kPX tspOWKNRIdfCGRNYVoSoP2DfAKmnohual+Dkr0g+B7X3nCQZp+8TW7CJi5hkH/+8JdnJ rwkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCjV4M2a5HS2Ac06EPlESpfU9HozGJMFJbXTVO8tw5cv9ZoA9p8 j5Zw7WBnGM7I7iE12Io= X-Received: by 10.98.145.26 with SMTP id l26mr2979463pfe.36.1496350873739; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 14:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MohammedMudassi ([49.207.51.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l85sm37493497pfj.130.2017.06.01.14.01.10 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Jun 2017 14:01:11 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daisy Fields" To: Subject: 3Com Users Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:30:23 +0530 Message-ID: <3e9401d2db1a$329c1c50$97d454f0$@guideprocenter.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdLbGhTaGeiUqnzsReGSkF1+YIPTcQ== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 21:01:15 -0000 Hi, Hope my email finds you well. Would you be interested in all 3Com Clients email list for your sales, marketing and email campaigns? We can provide you Database across North America, EMEA, APAC and Latin America. We provide complete Information Fields like - Name, Title, Email address, Phone Numbers, Company Name, and Company Details like, Physical Address, Web Address, Revenue Size, Employee Size and industry. We have list of 3Com Products which you may be interested in: * Juniper Networks * Netgear * Nortel * ProCurve * D-Link * Cisco * Intel * 3M * ZyXEL * Avaya and many more. Please review and let me know what technology users you are interested in and I will get back to you with more information for the same. I await your response and look forward to serving you! Regards, Daisy Fields Cloud Consultant If you wish not to receive these emails, please reply LEAVE OUT in the subject line. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 23:06:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05BCB82F05 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35D2708B5 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BF8C8B82F04; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF12DB82F03 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "saper.info", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E464708B4 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (saper@m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v51N6CnU064712 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:12 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=saper.info; s=Sep2014; t=1496358372; bh=xSB6Pavo+M7HEbnY93SLxcp4dm/q2OAVGe0o6GwbG7s=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=FOaGiYMRfmFefX4ApjtjLi9t2tFWUJlApjIm0G8/S4t9abJBzpuI4NfsUEk+aEVj4 QxwNP+wF4GlLourdcKpJetzGd4Mn+JQZOai2bkQWLXFMFvSSSGTsasTw9FWRVr9kDB ns1FtLmT2AIcblrsPilshJsisYE/oel9WUj0ysNM= Received: from localhost (saper@localhost) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v51N6CF4064709; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:12 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) X-Authentication-Warning: m.saper.info: saper owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:06:12 +0000 From: Marcin Cieslak To: Jov cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="1563967779-766598645-1496358372=:58953" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 23:06:15 -0000 --1563967779-766598645-1496358372=:58953 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Jov wrote: > can you dowload the file distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz > using > browser such as chrome？ Yes, Firefox, IE11, no certificate warnings. > be sure to use full chain cert file，I rember I had similar problem and use > full chain cert fixed. (Without the root CA): Certificate chain 0 s:/CN=marcincieslak.com i:/C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 1 s:/C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 i:/O=Digital Signature Trust Co./CN=DST Root CA X3 How should fetch know that "=Digital Signature Trust Co./CN=DST Root CA X3" is a valid CA if none have been installed? Marcin CieÅ›lak --1563967779-766598645-1496358372=:58953 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s MIIOSwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIOPDCCDjgCAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADAL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwGgggqQMIIElzCCA3+gAwIBAgIOSBtqCKJEiNNcmz3JSA0w DQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwTDEgMB4GA1UECxMXR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBSb290IENB IC0gUjMxEzARBgNVBAoTCkdsb2JhbFNpZ24xEzARBgNVBAMTCkdsb2JhbFNp Z24wHhcNMTYwNjE1MDAwMDAwWhcNMjQwNjE1MDAwMDAwWjBdMQswCQYDVQQG EwJCRTEZMBcGA1UEChMQR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBudi1zYTEzMDEGA1UEAxMqR2xv YmFsU2lnbiBQZXJzb25hbFNpZ24gMSBDQSAtIFNIQTI1NiAtIEczMIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyrCba00KOKyGuwh9h+/MAcZm ZUF9OxGKA56AADHaDE08rB0WEbgm6J4XvJP3OGQ7cgHdVJu6XMZkRd6EcfjD yRrIwE6oAVWJe57co3gKk/XxvuubSZuUahrcOiv3D2qaHwva4zumubxQQI4f unEzRIJHPiNjaq0cCcZsMcp5pxsEz8aG0sr8Oh80sxKNnzPmuUETLESktfMC pQKHUGmWXLsG6sgCZOezUjDjKpPKW7l4PUt0TEBEyqLhifv9/YPn5C4o10PP daDazZPeKNif2PVQ5u0HRnkFrHh4wmmrMtY22Mse3eR01gD6rEEGWf+gdzuy EQE+ZVlNhCP4gXjdBQIDAQABo4IBZDCCAWAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMCcG A1UdJQQgMB4GCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwkwEgYDVR0T AQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUlifCwqX3HPgCenpkr2NvMtKYwrEw HwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUj/BLf6guRSSuTVD6Y5qL3uLdG7wwPgYIKwYBBQUHAQEE MjAwMC4GCCsGAQUFBzABhiJodHRwOi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20v cm9vdHIzMDYGA1UdHwQvMC0wK6ApoCeGJWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZ2xvYmFsc2ln bi5jb20vcm9vdC1yMy5jcmwwWQYDVR0gBFIwUDALBgkrBgEEAaAyASgwQQYJ KwYBBAGgMgFfMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCxh3ekjKKy RrUdfI6D1U7qUggdFLksiU+KiIqJzJG6GXcQ2KiBy2tF3+KYb0IixXMpIVli VXlcD5Vh4tiMxJ4WONMFt3f7/53gSXLf24WMwErubc+mGMzgUGE5HKC98PcK UV/5pPggQdzPxCBNeiXnLU1tCGYhPatFTDhUBGaVhBeuUCbgR9gpXJ9guqrD OVwouKvovdIeI5KEAcoAAiSL6naeLk/GbKUaBFa2RxXC17e+YyBWtWlWDEM3 1V8pUIx76lkO8IJYREhLcg/LnyoYy5wcrzI6pbX2vw1x/jR3GHSC1AEdoqbE xui2XLLlSa6y9yQNgdkPz7GTLmpwIT+dMIIF8TCCBNmgAwIBAgIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMF0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAkJFMRkwFwYDVQQK ExBHbG9iYWxTaWduIG52LXNhMTMwMQYDVQQDEypHbG9iYWxTaWduIFBlcnNv bmFsU2lnbiAxIENBIC0gU0hBMjU2IC0gRzMwHhcNMTcwNTI1MDg0NDE2WhcN MjAwNTI1MDg0NDE2WjA8MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMR8w HQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEA2sO3aQNus/oe4ZBZ4fu1Y1mzxnUYAkb4k/dw gMFc2Kd0eRoOY0AHj4rTEi/vVzzizxjLbEwXzQ9cBEAu/PqS8WsOmhZXtlfi szPDmP7ZpOwmNTWKSd9O7jHu9uTCGfEOsocQNYH2ULD1gVFkgKb8jHf+3u9d uCzh6qMomTtwLrCGEP70Lq385xUzRaD6qbOeIB99tpzgvMR6Z0GPTt4z8tLM kfdtohq5llwZ5vYnj/hJohVS9iLMQMHW4nuLj/mLZNaYE1CWJBT1rBwn5YPJ uR6811O9eAP7aX4iG8k1jkiBh+QNgGRBIK4GIdqy7IVRhA7v2OlpLYHMk4zP 9Fs3M+56QromVKBnxfzLhuYMUK6ugj9jwskNVitqlEFUeyfgvmR1jnPRp1Nd XGJllTNwGicR8wkaRj14RxfrvTZfwXs8OBODKFupqun/tNzdpOgyHMGQACss 9yv2SnLGCJvJK3rGIdRZEiUhLZH/Ct4L92dBhev+SjUqWKbHb4yIlGMgLdoh nwqatuWw7iyOeInjcinX7ghiIKDWhulUN493Fzl6kaUBtIIcrb7jzZ2pHAQT WUmuVnCTHk6NtoWB09lvuK77fw4GfxLWDFWkBQiJYPVBrmxlrkCKzrWdTMfS W9BiEC10jT1sSimUBIjDz22RkfsApeBJoAIWjiOZogILu9MCAwEAAaOCAdAw ggHMMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDCBngYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgZEwgY4wTQYIKwYB BQUHMAKGQWh0dHA6Ly9zZWN1cmUuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vY2FjZXJ0L2dz cGVyc29uYWxzaWduMXNoYTJnM29jc3AuY3J0MD0GCCsGAQUFBzABhjFodHRw Oi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vZ3NwZXJzb25hbHNpZ24xc2hhMmcz MEwGA1UdIARFMEMwQQYJKwYBBAGgMgEoMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNpZ24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAw RAYDVR0fBD0wOzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC5nbG9iYWxzaWduLmNvbS9n c3BlcnNvbmFsc2lnbjFzaGEyZzMuY3JsMBsGA1UdEQQUMBKBEHNhcGVyQHNh cGVyLmluZm8wHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMB0GA1Ud DgQWBBReBINaGUKUo7HCrIjsKLKERu6ooTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSWJ8LCpfcc +AJ6emSvY28y0pjCsTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAC0VK968ySq/6B+Kd ecjVThQOKtVXuG17Krfk0xz7OPYR/V+qZtBFm2Uc6tkUEmAmq3Tyf+SE3TTX Q58eJFq0uCTUhIY714ioJs1uVWBz8rPyJ3swkOfDaUXUxkQsBsf73VfKjUk4 kB5MTrApLYUe35NmEY3FqyyX13elhW1tp864vOKM2Git61cYoRn/bwd/z2JM Zkxwkd5JgvmM+p4Da+WO4CUsGzdrZEH8X/8NQIzWtUDIh7VEQZFX5fot/KvH Am8AajtpmNqTfMyg6LfcfJUXSFqXn/KEWu4Td62vX6Pd70dYKUZxnLwYvGqG A4Ktrp9zyrUzxLbmdaPln7CstjGCA38wggN7AgEBMG0wXTELMAkGA1UEBhMC QkUxGTAXBgNVBAoTEEdsb2JhbFNpZ24gbnYtc2ExMzAxBgNVBAMTKkdsb2Jh bFNpZ24gUGVyc29uYWxTaWduIDEgQ0EgLSBTSEEyNTYgLSBHMwIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCWCGSAFlAwQCAQUAoIHkMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE3MDYwMTIzMDYxMlowLwYJKoZIhvcN AQkEMSIEILwun80bEkMBauSXlcCSzea0zK3Wy17IOLD08vFNgiMMMHkGCSqG SIb3DQEJDzFsMGowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBFjALBglghkgB ZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMC AgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIC AJyaSR70PnVLd8CXjW4rzZLmv2LinwvCO9tZCX8Hk/lYoII/Z6vhP53di8/0 353mUNOa5JaVL9xdKtpHWTeTZH/wMdxecBpsZmcWm5G2cAB4lLu4ktGIUhLt R2uBvQ4SgIukNwjqgsaIdOjmWvFLHRtv0tbGJfdRaNstpA9dHKEys8X0Sj9h wrQYylruZo7EAYFyTO1BX1eXaQDHPDbRZcOnufyV+cl9tRKZCslMim6DG2IY /NVj/87taynAnh1Fk9dkhy4OfRMVlsUsGxuy8zu0Sv4bCGYobATXAUdgoDRr OYgBU2q9+TiD56OL9TbLIRN0KlM2sBIEGRqjIaLqwGr8CNEFhnXGBlupkBsV xPGae9L1xlEgOXNDULugLjiwemlqR+jHfvEQSAzqME5ZBJagDFCW11jRUwTs w4EoFgmfj9ssuBYgO8A5TPVO+A6vxwYjBflDAkYnbwxrxGfTJ4I2uBzoWQbr C19qHIxgyBA5NthRgzxU4DvbphanZdRwrrNwZrVtUWpR3Zg9L63PNet7ICDY +Zh+hcz0FWLdMg4uoC5cENyvL3E1hpMkvf5OilrshZ2OJTLmI4P2mB8JfPcr JLDfnYZQCHo/nH7yITfZGCygw9oHPsjgUv4OHMjFb2I1uLnFLHCwmN1ABMB2 Xk66N23NKJBJgM6KijV+Rqv9 --1563967779-766598645-1496358372=:58953-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 23:30:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089E5B94384 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic312-49.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic312-49.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.191.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AFA70FC7 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1496359821; bh=43VasqQNAraTtr+r+m94srDQs0+QnJmDQuDf6Rp1SGk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=o8LaQshusWWDwoC8gOAnvU8Fmwi+3ESrW94xkCw8GORQKg4PGeaKurF0zoE/LSBtDYwrJB+ObBceyK62J01aa6LP9NITgHzIkkT9rf7o/zZzKK3+n4MbOJaLfSVpzGPKa2Zx0oe9n5Q6ue3fsKeTWnEspvp0Q/So+RZLXL1JLR67CUYrfXBd8kxnYe3NQsQ2I8OEAP+1vMGYlhRyLTqWtiCkcwTUPrMG5mxzgY0gTAMOkTiKdqbP1mi+t55SuAT8ldyIeuR1JhBf1KgQJ/vZnCa1C/awj0ytEV75GJvpWMeGP9pvJNOaqQbv2Afv3wNVBcXwV3OrPPYrTp2Wm6Kd4A== X-YMail-OSG: m96gPfkVM1nz6Vz0mUe7hrn_Sv8ZAN0ZfYZkEdTuaQNjXjesPyTXm6U9mbhvQ63 GDjEzxI6E7Mk2L5zzJ8hkgSmELbI2kmnksVqpvMnkVIGr0gTKGgLSXnkD0m7.kIwlUSHNhLY2Ajn BEagjnEKAXWfiDYxLu1ACA2AGl0eOAOIOJltKCrghbU2qtkCLCAOl0r8oOzWS3D.MsFZBjZs5QYY N5_CWg7PiibyTqmU32IXN.koEKc81_3pc4f7Vaq5TVtoA32yJBQKQpOuTMArB.YXWkcbffIEC7Mb UGE2oQng5yh8KHg5vk98IWrX7KC8EUkWvY_p6CFeZjFTElFDZweHwsMxeuFkdwrVBbcHapiIf8uV PqFyfvcaOWgg3_LfwzjasFclwp3Z0.OgtquAl3Uwr6WMqu1hwHlT73TnhxKfq76_nc4ZNVLKhhE6 dIStlxvdb1zgqffqZoE9UzrTKapKgvSE6rrkodDTdIv8VIjP45uA60ZQgormI_BQIoXzufVbhmP0 9d2viRiezVQrwEGYvJRxvND6QqmwSSBzgbgD.0MMwu116WEmZoNhDONrtnJlWBSI- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic312.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:30:21 +0000 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:35:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Jeffrey Bouquet Reply-To: Jeffrey Bouquet To: , , blubee blubeeme Message-ID: <1452547285.767963.1496356546815@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: nvidia drivers mutex lock MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <1452547285.767963.1496356546815.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.9726 YahooMailBasic Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 Lightning/5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 23:30:23 -0000 I see the same message, upon load, ... -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 6/1/17, blubee blubeeme wrote: Subject: nvidia drivers mutex lock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thursday, June 1, 2017, 11:35 AM =20 I'm running nvidia-drivers 375.66 with a GTX 1070 on FreeBSD-Current =20 This problem just started happening recently but, every so often my laptop screen will just blank out and then I have to power cycle to get the machine up and running again. =20 It seems to be a problem with nvidia drivers acquiring duplicate lock. Any info on this? =20 Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "os.lock_mtx" Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: 1st os.lock_mtx @ nvidia_os.c:841 Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: 2nd os.lock_mtx @ nvidia_os.c:841 Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: stack backtrace: Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #0 0xffffffff80ab7770 at witness_debugger+0x70 Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #1 0xffffffff80ab7663 at witness_checkorder+0xe23 Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #2 0xffffffff80a35b93 at __mtx_lock_flags+0x93 Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #3 0xffffffff82f4397b at os_acquire_spinlock+0x1b Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: #4 0xffffffff82c48b15 at _nv012002rm+0x185 Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:41 blubee kernel: ACPI Warning: \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20170303/nsarguments-205) Jun=C2=A0 2 02:29:42 blubee kernel: nvidia-modeset: Allocated GPU:0 (GPU-54a7b304-c99d-efee-0117-0ce119063cd6) @ PCI:0000:01:00.0 =20 Best, Owen _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =20 ... then Xorg will run happily twelve hours or so. The lockups here happen= usually when too large or too many of number of tabs/ large web pages with complex = CSS etc are opened at a time. =20 So no help, just a 'me too'. =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 00:18:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2380B95716 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 00:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b451e195.AEEALRC74GEAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMKx_@bnc3.mailjet.com) Received: from o121.p8.mailjet.com (o121.p8.mailjet.com [87.253.233.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F31473C61 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 00:18:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b451e195.AEEALRC74GEAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMKx_@bnc3.mailjet.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; d=waitman.net; i=waitman@waitman.net; s=mailjet; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:mime-version:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:list-unsubscribe: in-reply-to:mail-reply-to:organization:references:x-csa-complaints: x-mj-mid:x-sender:x-ua-local:x-ua-server:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ibw4T9R7nJIiYeTliIC5ZVRSADg=; b=s3SyoOrRNHgcjJl9VmHxXATqCVL9PL6ThMwf3QCLvcRWUJGqnpJ6nEvpy Rhbs6jE9ziirRA5ghnIeODmpMdlmWZ9dnuiqVYvWbLIrNvTgmaVrup+wrQVe LsLTwq60BGSCpLmJitfHReEiYiolSVBtbniwH2dT8GjmDXu9N4IcqU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; q=dns; d=waitman.net; s=mailjet; h=message-id:mime-version:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:list-unsubscribe: in-reply-to:mail-reply-to:organization:references:x-csa-complaints: x-mj-mid:x-sender:x-ua-local:x-ua-server:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dtwF5LekwRCPi6WFFuja763dXWlUqMqRqWz+3TVzfNNHUVuDA9spZHWvW e/5QquIsOMddmMo1tzssBZX5DAomel95uM9ULQbIerYJs4t16NtLXppO8Dr0 Fv8xBxQQYtwcMfwZjV2lgXeN8Bm8i6RTUrZg3OKJM2JCR37V58uFJg= Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Waitman Gobble Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net To: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: Sylpheed bug? Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 19:08:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: Mail-Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net Organization: Waitman Gobble References: <5e016da3.AEAAK0XQjQMAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMA6S@mailjet.com> X-CSA-Complaints: whitelist-complaints@eco.de X-MJ-Mid: AEEALRC74GEAAAAAAAAAAGcOSDsAAAAAjvkAAAAAAAXflABZMKx_raZA3TTNRSi7dH_O-ijZhwAFoPU X-Sender: waitman@waitman.net X-UA-Local: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0 X-UA-Server: Arduent/99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:18:33 -0000 On 2017-06-01 15:52, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello! > Some things to check: > 1) is Sylpheed the only program that makes your Xorg crash? > 2) which DE (Desktop Environment) are you using? I'm using Xfce > 3) are any "special effects" turned on in your Xorg / DE setup? Things > like Compositor, ...? > 4) if "yes" in 3 - does it help if you turn off those "special > effects"? > 5) Are you using ports exclusively, or are you mixing ports and > packages? > > HTH So far it appears that Sylpheed is the only thing I have installed that crashes Xorg. But I'd probably need to see how they built Sylpheed, like if they used GTK or whatever. I glanced at the source for 60 seconds and nothing popped out. I'm using KDE. I used to only use Xfce, I cannot remember why I switched to KDE but i've been using that on everything. On this machine I've only installed pkg. I'm pretty sure the Xorg 'pos' bug was discovered and fixed in August 2016, and this version probably does not have that fix. This is obviously compositing, I'd have to research where to turn that off to see if it makes a difference. But maybe it's OK to wait for a new Xorg version. --- Waitman Gobble From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 01:20:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C836BD3EBB for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374C875F7A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 33B83BD3EBA; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3347DBD3EB9 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7F875F79 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id f55so49625781qta.3 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 18:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rbxwaIa1g8yNdfasQkCEWWn89vq/jddDDG/voCLH/s0=; b=PScKNQ5YuROQ0H9mjBjhEha3DtESN9duxQbMptr0fpXLKuvzAh5kOU7U8yAUTQFN0x L6prnZa7soSlkQCpahuS+og7S5pfxyfQqp9RriFau2OV7AUqEuRRsqb1lrJRicMmO/cO 4u/VgbHVr3YUVb4q+eMZ57vbpQeZrrOQJM9CjpNTeTX3gP9vZw3QTj9vGGsrOSExhrXh 61FRbm/XAJ7Egf8LYwkXiwaQS3RZmKnujO49UIbPef6ocR8owyZkxf2sVtyy2lF1UZR/ ise+G73HPp/e3Bw191EKOz4AgjEhf3Cz4ueiQsTOgjDBUlVJY/o3K3l4qKETR3L6VqiN Yv3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rbxwaIa1g8yNdfasQkCEWWn89vq/jddDDG/voCLH/s0=; b=Qd+6URMzJ/CQsAhm09vDF4f7qf9y1bXvawLE1e+YT6zuDwZOoAOUG1gLGPi2O490Qf c5ZqFffGeJzgpbXaeuGlKh5Cfk5k54kCC92JtVmHO+oUkiacK1eAybW9LkdGtVdc6c40 D4BKaQxi4Dt25/PFYVEmKspXcGU5Gd2NFrE97iIleF18oMoyTPHVpWOhoqFKlnegupdC nG8uCpLAXSeeHvgNW6laE84d5bqBZZr/xashCcTkhj/kQTjeumKgnwieO6BscogY6jKb BFHmaDub0iKTsEPW1r5VeOUk4FkFqu7k6h7M+m916hf9XRjll6fvZZcwmSLMo/SzeFUz YpXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC+mXU0fKCfeIJwWir0POsDnY8ZtzaSFmsWhoV9KW/6kzYOGMtQ Fdn9kP/iWX67sRI2LjHfVKK3lZOqTg== X-Received: by 10.200.33.232 with SMTP id 37mr6011702qtz.189.1496366431073; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 18:20:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.20.206 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.20.206 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:20:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Freddie Cash Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:20:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? To: Marcin Cieslak Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Jov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 01:20:32 -0000 On Jun 1, 2017 4:06 PM, "Marcin Cieslak" wrote: On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Jov wrote: > can you dowload the file distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz > using > browser such as chrome=EF=BC=9F Yes, Firefox, IE11, no certificate warnings. > be sure to use full chain cert file=EF=BC=8CI rember I had similar proble= m and use > full chain cert fixed. (Without the root CA): Certificate chain 0 s:/CN=3Dmarcincieslak.com i:/C=3DUS/O=3DLet's Encrypt/CN=3DLet's Encrypt Authority X3 1 s:/C=3DUS/O=3DLet's Encrypt/CN=3DLet's Encrypt Authority X3 i:/O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA X3 How should fetch know that "=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA= X3" is a valid CA if none have been installed? Marcin Cie=C5=9Blak In your web server configuration, are you using the Let's Encrypt cert.pem or fullchain.pem? If you use the former, then any client that doesn't have the DST Root CA pre-installed will error out. The latest versions of browsers will work, as they include the DST Root CA. If you use the latter, then it will just work, as the server will send all the intermediate certificate info needed to reach the root. Cheers, Freddie From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 02:13:54 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EA2BEDCC6 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B397722C for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3FB59BEDCC5; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9EDBEDCC4 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "saper.info", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9F417722B for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (saper@m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v522Doau067076 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:50 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=saper.info; s=Sep2014; t=1496369630; bh=EbBdXTANIHAVvbx+SfV7lm7QD5Voa3bL9TAU6OQHzLc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Xbe6Q+iJNunO8qBcAVnPiv/fxe30yWfyliwhjzudTr7GCM7sQLPlNRHn+knoLaXPu cjAVeDCOiwb1UFox6R8wDQ2UhL5LBhtYQPNtsvM63EguIkxMm948rJLkjfiBCI2qd+ MoBci6OvZfyjoziqLFVXI6+3lrv+1OZTr3NFCeZ0= Received: from localhost (saper@localhost) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v522DoK7067073; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:50 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) X-Authentication-Warning: m.saper.info: saper owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:13:50 +0000 From: Marcin Cieslak To: Freddie Cash cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Jov Subject: Re: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="1563967779-170823914-1496369630=:65985" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 02:13:54 -0000 --1563967779-170823914-1496369630=:65985 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Freddie Cash wrote: > In your web server configuration, are you using the Let's Encrypt cert.pem > or fullchain.pem? fullchain.pem > If you use the former, then any client that doesn't have the DST Root CA > pre-installed will error out. The latest versions of browsers will work, as > they include the DST Root CA. My fullchain.pem as delivered by dehydrated does not include the DST Root CA. > If you use the latter, then it will just work, as the server will send all > the intermediate certificate info needed to reach the root. To test this theory, I have added DST Root CA to my customized fullchain.pem which now contains: Certificate chain 0 s:/CN=marcincieslak.com i:/C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 1 s:/C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3 i:/O=Digital Signature Trust Co./CN=DST Root CA X3 2 s:/O=Digital Signature Trust Co./CN=DST Root CA X3 i:/O=Digital Signature Trust Co./CN=DST Root CA X3 so now we have "DST Root CA X3" extra. And the result is: => INIT.2014-12-24.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /portdistfiles/ksh93. => Attempting to fetch https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz Certificate verification failed for /O=Digital Signature Trust Co./CN=DST Root CA X3 34374329736:error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_clnt.c:1264: fetch: https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz: Authentication error => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz: Not Found so it cannot validate "DST Root CA X3" now, because it does not have the pre-installed CA bundle. Marcin Cie¶lak --1563967779-170823914-1496369630=:65985 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s MIIOSwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIOPDCCDjgCAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADAL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwGgggqQMIIElzCCA3+gAwIBAgIOSBtqCKJEiNNcmz3JSA0w DQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwTDEgMB4GA1UECxMXR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBSb290IENB IC0gUjMxEzARBgNVBAoTCkdsb2JhbFNpZ24xEzARBgNVBAMTCkdsb2JhbFNp Z24wHhcNMTYwNjE1MDAwMDAwWhcNMjQwNjE1MDAwMDAwWjBdMQswCQYDVQQG EwJCRTEZMBcGA1UEChMQR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBudi1zYTEzMDEGA1UEAxMqR2xv YmFsU2lnbiBQZXJzb25hbFNpZ24gMSBDQSAtIFNIQTI1NiAtIEczMIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyrCba00KOKyGuwh9h+/MAcZm ZUF9OxGKA56AADHaDE08rB0WEbgm6J4XvJP3OGQ7cgHdVJu6XMZkRd6EcfjD yRrIwE6oAVWJe57co3gKk/XxvuubSZuUahrcOiv3D2qaHwva4zumubxQQI4f unEzRIJHPiNjaq0cCcZsMcp5pxsEz8aG0sr8Oh80sxKNnzPmuUETLESktfMC pQKHUGmWXLsG6sgCZOezUjDjKpPKW7l4PUt0TEBEyqLhifv9/YPn5C4o10PP daDazZPeKNif2PVQ5u0HRnkFrHh4wmmrMtY22Mse3eR01gD6rEEGWf+gdzuy EQE+ZVlNhCP4gXjdBQIDAQABo4IBZDCCAWAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMCcG A1UdJQQgMB4GCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwkwEgYDVR0T AQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUlifCwqX3HPgCenpkr2NvMtKYwrEw HwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUj/BLf6guRSSuTVD6Y5qL3uLdG7wwPgYIKwYBBQUHAQEE MjAwMC4GCCsGAQUFBzABhiJodHRwOi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20v cm9vdHIzMDYGA1UdHwQvMC0wK6ApoCeGJWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZ2xvYmFsc2ln bi5jb20vcm9vdC1yMy5jcmwwWQYDVR0gBFIwUDALBgkrBgEEAaAyASgwQQYJ KwYBBAGgMgFfMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCxh3ekjKKy RrUdfI6D1U7qUggdFLksiU+KiIqJzJG6GXcQ2KiBy2tF3+KYb0IixXMpIVli VXlcD5Vh4tiMxJ4WONMFt3f7/53gSXLf24WMwErubc+mGMzgUGE5HKC98PcK UV/5pPggQdzPxCBNeiXnLU1tCGYhPatFTDhUBGaVhBeuUCbgR9gpXJ9guqrD OVwouKvovdIeI5KEAcoAAiSL6naeLk/GbKUaBFa2RxXC17e+YyBWtWlWDEM3 1V8pUIx76lkO8IJYREhLcg/LnyoYy5wcrzI6pbX2vw1x/jR3GHSC1AEdoqbE xui2XLLlSa6y9yQNgdkPz7GTLmpwIT+dMIIF8TCCBNmgAwIBAgIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMF0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAkJFMRkwFwYDVQQK ExBHbG9iYWxTaWduIG52LXNhMTMwMQYDVQQDEypHbG9iYWxTaWduIFBlcnNv bmFsU2lnbiAxIENBIC0gU0hBMjU2IC0gRzMwHhcNMTcwNTI1MDg0NDE2WhcN MjAwNTI1MDg0NDE2WjA8MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMR8w HQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEA2sO3aQNus/oe4ZBZ4fu1Y1mzxnUYAkb4k/dw gMFc2Kd0eRoOY0AHj4rTEi/vVzzizxjLbEwXzQ9cBEAu/PqS8WsOmhZXtlfi szPDmP7ZpOwmNTWKSd9O7jHu9uTCGfEOsocQNYH2ULD1gVFkgKb8jHf+3u9d uCzh6qMomTtwLrCGEP70Lq385xUzRaD6qbOeIB99tpzgvMR6Z0GPTt4z8tLM kfdtohq5llwZ5vYnj/hJohVS9iLMQMHW4nuLj/mLZNaYE1CWJBT1rBwn5YPJ uR6811O9eAP7aX4iG8k1jkiBh+QNgGRBIK4GIdqy7IVRhA7v2OlpLYHMk4zP 9Fs3M+56QromVKBnxfzLhuYMUK6ugj9jwskNVitqlEFUeyfgvmR1jnPRp1Nd XGJllTNwGicR8wkaRj14RxfrvTZfwXs8OBODKFupqun/tNzdpOgyHMGQACss 9yv2SnLGCJvJK3rGIdRZEiUhLZH/Ct4L92dBhev+SjUqWKbHb4yIlGMgLdoh nwqatuWw7iyOeInjcinX7ghiIKDWhulUN493Fzl6kaUBtIIcrb7jzZ2pHAQT WUmuVnCTHk6NtoWB09lvuK77fw4GfxLWDFWkBQiJYPVBrmxlrkCKzrWdTMfS W9BiEC10jT1sSimUBIjDz22RkfsApeBJoAIWjiOZogILu9MCAwEAAaOCAdAw ggHMMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDCBngYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgZEwgY4wTQYIKwYB BQUHMAKGQWh0dHA6Ly9zZWN1cmUuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vY2FjZXJ0L2dz cGVyc29uYWxzaWduMXNoYTJnM29jc3AuY3J0MD0GCCsGAQUFBzABhjFodHRw Oi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vZ3NwZXJzb25hbHNpZ24xc2hhMmcz MEwGA1UdIARFMEMwQQYJKwYBBAGgMgEoMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNpZ24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAw RAYDVR0fBD0wOzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC5nbG9iYWxzaWduLmNvbS9n c3BlcnNvbmFsc2lnbjFzaGEyZzMuY3JsMBsGA1UdEQQUMBKBEHNhcGVyQHNh cGVyLmluZm8wHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMB0GA1Ud DgQWBBReBINaGUKUo7HCrIjsKLKERu6ooTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSWJ8LCpfcc +AJ6emSvY28y0pjCsTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAC0VK968ySq/6B+Kd ecjVThQOKtVXuG17Krfk0xz7OPYR/V+qZtBFm2Uc6tkUEmAmq3Tyf+SE3TTX Q58eJFq0uCTUhIY714ioJs1uVWBz8rPyJ3swkOfDaUXUxkQsBsf73VfKjUk4 kB5MTrApLYUe35NmEY3FqyyX13elhW1tp864vOKM2Git61cYoRn/bwd/z2JM Zkxwkd5JgvmM+p4Da+WO4CUsGzdrZEH8X/8NQIzWtUDIh7VEQZFX5fot/KvH Am8AajtpmNqTfMyg6LfcfJUXSFqXn/KEWu4Td62vX6Pd70dYKUZxnLwYvGqG A4Ktrp9zyrUzxLbmdaPln7CstjGCA38wggN7AgEBMG0wXTELMAkGA1UEBhMC QkUxGTAXBgNVBAoTEEdsb2JhbFNpZ24gbnYtc2ExMzAxBgNVBAMTKkdsb2Jh bFNpZ24gUGVyc29uYWxTaWduIDEgQ0EgLSBTSEEyNTYgLSBHMwIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCWCGSAFlAwQCAQUAoIHkMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE3MDYwMjAyMTM1MFowLwYJKoZIhvcN AQkEMSIEICuG942c9omxls5E2OAKgfCshS7uEEVkp0IAPPecUy/EMHkGCSqG SIb3DQEJDzFsMGowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBFjALBglghkgB ZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMC AgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIC AJJz5UgzVFBeXPzqP4OPKNClON/WAGRiywb9VcMmfUri4FqhHCplYe76gYtJ 6ADgd5+SDONCEQ05/cICeB5DAQOnhK6u7XLYXTnPvccqrg+g1BuZ/cnmRvlu n9EwKCijg5J4JDUUxwsRBhC9BUR8i0F4mEfSsqsDc9P1GwL3q8mE1fnSBk1A M1ZoljoZxntLKP9Zv8Dnp+u7YXbzxtu0WN33j1nJsQQMA9qUdKj7X0C8GzZh ZlePMrhe6nGDPtwQoP93L4Yw8hDfR+6jPMB0sh1+2h9UHvsDHXTrwgZrLJZp NPyVcwpYMN+l19/8A7CFUQ9La98Rx1GPOPJJAIHkQTc32LlR2Oadpki00ZIe TLgctibQMyIHe5z7CdloMINk+r1TGiiIDy8rE8Lys80ngOwV/dF00OHFmtI1 i65FSk+KdcSh5ORVlGqfUcc7eYcZgjfUOrFa/cmGRoBQ7SB5e5UYbVpaTla+ xj7iLWqsYrYetaJtDcWdfCigyKQyLz6K0j8O8OStuXFiA+mOkCpn8kd2+gy+ HiuHy+qUR9auRmYYazeqKKTt0lAGkNGX/aO1YoRo+X6xdScnvAwJIKhlc0wK 6kw3vHCEeGwcaUmz1m/jyGq/4nukSxDIm7DA9fFkGH81Ae5juVUILHjWQm2h Y+D5CGjfHH53hNIFOKTcW7qI --1563967779-170823914-1496369630=:65985-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 03:15:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3169DBEEBA6 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A23B78E0B for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 09855BEEBA5; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092AEBEEBA4 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD00578E09 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id h4so76998246oib.3 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 20:15:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=za5K5L6OtKSruxkPdcoi8qCkGcgl10H5KdDNxEXn2N8=; b=pfWn/rfXPDf9cxrVTMDH32n3v2yDI9k6AkeoJ3M/rVudx3CaOpo8+677sdjBeNPpvF t9P5U/qaSZ6YX5wZ22eab8NuWQCuoHbIjIoHowtmM9VFjR5EcOiA9g0XNFXqUQ33loDg TkWC1HlLX4wEApUJrobvuL2pjKdr1l9sFqfG2Y4BdkIvBMoH6EQL48LI/IB+jeTnEG7w WCK4RlmkvHz/dOSPWMa9IEazVEOK8oy0GMN41/Nug8BiLHMQeuvPVdbUu8cOUfhtyYtr ZPrzlQM4LfsPggGs4a4iWMhNFD9xQs8kAiG8u0LyTADcDT6mRT5pi6mIPKccHVXChq7R VkBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=za5K5L6OtKSruxkPdcoi8qCkGcgl10H5KdDNxEXn2N8=; b=rbWa8bUdnz2pTcS04R/UPc32ttZG9S5oi7hBgoS9b1vkVuytSTzTXgfeoRqr/sPGwW 2GhEGhFDqOWU5RavlQ47MqAOoFiptTPPz4CFt6k913QToDMTMZmnhNJfxhU4ASQ1hRLf g0MdK4J7JZnIBElwWvgBDTS4cvxkkyKa36b5KzN2IFKedscjU5NiHjr5z34hdYWWpJZX Pg2EvH9NjSI84qGdBOLyqUcnBs9Hjw9ffUlCgTzdRN758xDd3L+gphKCmVthOWz4lfho zur/I75mrNvqQ9zFnd+imGjI/krX+iveiODDN1bVszZcyBNYgEY6HIWLHrkHRAxxZIai 5clA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCR/7McOwUboKrEivKQNvqeAhOmfkHmSwXESKZ3kMDeNBZ6Bkcz mJTyADja8Y0pKgytaB5C8Q7vHU+n5HeDza0= X-Received: by 10.157.19.40 with SMTP id f37mr3442647ote.118.1496373341195; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 20:15:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.134.72 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:15:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jov Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:15:20 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? To: Marcin Cieslak Cc: Freddie Cash , FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 03:15:42 -0000 what's your /etc/ssl/cert.pem? mine is: ls -l /etc/ssl/cert.pem lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 4=E6=9C=88 29 09:15 /etc/ssl/cert.pem@ -> /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt you can use this command to get more ssl connection info: openssl s_client -connect :443 Jov blog: http:amutu.com/blog 2017-06-02 10:13 GMT+08:00 Marcin Cieslak : > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Freddie Cash wrote: > > > In your web server configuration, are you using the Let's Encrypt > cert.pem > > or fullchain.pem? > > fullchain.pem > > > If you use the former, then any client that doesn't have the DST Root C= A > > pre-installed will error out. The latest versions of browsers will work= , > as > > they include the DST Root CA. > > My fullchain.pem as delivered by dehydrated does not include the DST Root > CA. > > > If you use the latter, then it will just work, as the server will send > all > > the intermediate certificate info needed to reach the root. > > To test this theory, I have added DST Root CA to my customized > fullchain.pem > which now contains: > > Certificate chain > 0 s:/CN=3Dmarcincieslak.com > i:/C=3DUS/O=3DLet's Encrypt/CN=3DLet's Encrypt Authority X3 > > 1 s:/C=3DUS/O=3DLet's Encrypt/CN=3DLet's Encrypt Authority X3 > i:/O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA X3 > > 2 s:/O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA X3 > i:/O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA X3 > > so now we have "DST Root CA X3" extra. > > And the result is: > > =3D> INIT.2014-12-24.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /portdistfiles/ksh93. > =3D> Attempting to fetch https://distfile.net/local- > ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz > Certificate verification failed for /O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN= =3DDST > Root CA X3 > 34374329736:error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certi= ficate > verify failed:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/ > openssl/ssl/s3_clnt.c:1264: > fetch: https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz: > Authentication error > =3D> Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ > ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz > fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT. > 2014-12-24.tgz: Not Found > > so it cannot validate "DST Root CA X3" now, because it does not have the > pre-installed CA bundle. > > > Marcin Cie=C5=9Blak From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 04:34:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9525BEFAD9 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24857A947 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AEADCBEFAD8; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC680BEFAD7 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDB77A946 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4f081a45 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:33:55 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:33:53 -0600 Cc: Marcin Cieslak , FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9D4AA628-1BB2-42DA-860E-829C8C3390FD@adamw.org> References: To: Jov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 04:34:00 -0000 > On 1 Jun, 2017, at 21:15, Jov wrote: >=20 > what's your /etc/ssl/cert.pem? > mine is: > ls -l /etc/ssl/cert.pem > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 4=E6=9C=88 29 09:15 /etc/ssl/cert.pem@ = -> > /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt >=20 > you can use this command to get more ssl connection info: > openssl s_client -connect :443 I've tried fetching a distfile from my own server (which uses a Let's = Encrypt cert) and it fetches fine in a poudriere jail. I'm suspecting = that there's something unusual in your web server's SSL configuration, = or in how you're generating your LE cert. Do you have any interesting = arguments that you're giving dehydrated or your web server? # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org >=20 > Jov > blog: http:amutu.com/blog >=20 > 2017-06-02 10:13 GMT+08:00 Marcin Cieslak : >=20 >> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Freddie Cash wrote: >>=20 >>> In your web server configuration, are you using the Let's Encrypt >> cert.pem >>> or fullchain.pem? >>=20 >> fullchain.pem >>=20 >>> If you use the former, then any client that doesn't have the DST = Root CA >>> pre-installed will error out. The latest versions of browsers will = work, >> as >>> they include the DST Root CA. >>=20 >> My fullchain.pem as delivered by dehydrated does not include the DST = Root >> CA. >>=20 >>> If you use the latter, then it will just work, as the server will = send >> all >>> the intermediate certificate info needed to reach the root. >>=20 >> To test this theory, I have added DST Root CA to my customized >> fullchain.pem >> which now contains: >>=20 >> Certificate chain >> 0 s:/CN=3Dmarcincieslak.com >> i:/C=3DUS/O=3DLet's Encrypt/CN=3DLet's Encrypt Authority X3 >>=20 >> 1 s:/C=3DUS/O=3DLet's Encrypt/CN=3DLet's Encrypt Authority X3 >> i:/O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA X3 >>=20 >> 2 s:/O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA X3 >> i:/O=3DDigital Signature Trust Co./CN=3DDST Root CA X3 >>=20 >> so now we have "DST Root CA X3" extra. >>=20 >> And the result is: >>=20 >> =3D> INIT.2014-12-24.tgz doesn't seem to exist in = /portdistfiles/ksh93. >> =3D> Attempting to fetch https://distfile.net/local- >> ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz >> Certificate verification failed for /O=3DDigital Signature Trust = Co./CN=3DDST >> Root CA X3 >> 34374329736:error:14090086:SSL = routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate >> verify failed:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/ >> openssl/ssl/s3_clnt.c:1264: >> fetch: = https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz: >> Authentication error >> =3D> Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ >> ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz >> fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/ksh93/INIT. >> 2014-12-24.tgz: Not Found >>=20 >> so it cannot validate "DST Root CA X3" now, because it does not have = the >> pre-installed CA bundle. >>=20 >>=20 >> Marcin Cie=C5=9Blak > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 07:06:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F05BF183F for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EF37DB12 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 171B3BF1839; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A62BF1838 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "saper.info", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB877DB11 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from m.saper.info (saper@m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v5276h8l072976 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:44 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=saper.info; s=Sep2014; t=1496387204; bh=gQoUWd4bNXJL8J7ugH4XjBNrcCr40J8PDbDVcE66/i0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Paa+fdh6MLCK47XUyBiNyRXVQkEbhxuQejz4+Fh19yOJal5P8UZeoN3SYKgFSFDKo WBckfoMlyCnZBt92mprwZk+iPwILKqzWcHyC10wPilvuIauneHZ6y/RfeL9JamIz0R YOhIdiDxEaect2aSYMtdh0R/LGB/Kc1UV0mV+VxA= Received: from localhost (saper@localhost) by m.saper.info (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v5276h4V072973; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:43 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) X-Authentication-Warning: m.saper.info: saper owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:06:43 +0000 From: Marcin Cieslak To: Adam Weinberger cc: Jov , FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Freddie Cash Subject: Re: Hosting distfiles on HTTPS w/Let's Encrypt - how? In-Reply-To: <9D4AA628-1BB2-42DA-860E-829C8C3390FD@adamw.org> Message-ID: References: <9D4AA628-1BB2-42DA-860E-829C8C3390FD@adamw.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="1563967779-157018144-1496387203=:65985" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 07:06:50 -0000 --1563967779-157018144-1496387203=:65985 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: > I've tried fetching a distfile from my own server (which uses a Let's Encrypt cert) and it fetches fine in a poudriere jail. I'm suspecting that there's something unusual in your web server's SSL configuration, or in how you're generating your LE cert. Do you have any interesting arguments that you're giving dehydrated or your web server? The only unusual thing in my certificate is that CN belongs to another domain and the domain in question is listed in the subjectAltName along with a primary. On a system with certificate bundle installed the following works fine: fetch https://distfile.net/local-ports-distfiles/INIT.2014-12-24.tgz My port (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211164) has barely any dependencies, and there is no certificate bundle in the jail. Adam - can you check if something installs NSS CA roots as a dependency in your jail? I think I understand what happens - bare FreeBSD installation has no CA bundles, therefore fetch cannot really do https. Most ports work either because one of the dependencies installs ca root nss or they have a plain HTTP fallback (from distcache if need be). My distfiles are brand new and the distcache does not know them, not there is any HTTP fallback. The question is: do we silently require at least one unencrypted HTTP or FTP distfile source? If not, what should be done to bootstrap certificates for fetch - include somme roots in base, turn off certificate validation, other options? Marcin --1563967779-157018144-1496387203=:65985 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s MIIOSwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIOPDCCDjgCAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADAL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwGgggqQMIIElzCCA3+gAwIBAgIOSBtqCKJEiNNcmz3JSA0w DQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwTDEgMB4GA1UECxMXR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBSb290IENB IC0gUjMxEzARBgNVBAoTCkdsb2JhbFNpZ24xEzARBgNVBAMTCkdsb2JhbFNp Z24wHhcNMTYwNjE1MDAwMDAwWhcNMjQwNjE1MDAwMDAwWjBdMQswCQYDVQQG EwJCRTEZMBcGA1UEChMQR2xvYmFsU2lnbiBudi1zYTEzMDEGA1UEAxMqR2xv YmFsU2lnbiBQZXJzb25hbFNpZ24gMSBDQSAtIFNIQTI1NiAtIEczMIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyrCba00KOKyGuwh9h+/MAcZm ZUF9OxGKA56AADHaDE08rB0WEbgm6J4XvJP3OGQ7cgHdVJu6XMZkRd6EcfjD yRrIwE6oAVWJe57co3gKk/XxvuubSZuUahrcOiv3D2qaHwva4zumubxQQI4f unEzRIJHPiNjaq0cCcZsMcp5pxsEz8aG0sr8Oh80sxKNnzPmuUETLESktfMC pQKHUGmWXLsG6sgCZOezUjDjKpPKW7l4PUt0TEBEyqLhifv9/YPn5C4o10PP daDazZPeKNif2PVQ5u0HRnkFrHh4wmmrMtY22Mse3eR01gD6rEEGWf+gdzuy EQE+ZVlNhCP4gXjdBQIDAQABo4IBZDCCAWAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMCcG A1UdJQQgMB4GCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwkwEgYDVR0T AQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUlifCwqX3HPgCenpkr2NvMtKYwrEw HwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUj/BLf6guRSSuTVD6Y5qL3uLdG7wwPgYIKwYBBQUHAQEE MjAwMC4GCCsGAQUFBzABhiJodHRwOi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20v cm9vdHIzMDYGA1UdHwQvMC0wK6ApoCeGJWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZ2xvYmFsc2ln bi5jb20vcm9vdC1yMy5jcmwwWQYDVR0gBFIwUDALBgkrBgEEAaAyASgwQQYJ KwYBBAGgMgFfMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQCxh3ekjKKy RrUdfI6D1U7qUggdFLksiU+KiIqJzJG6GXcQ2KiBy2tF3+KYb0IixXMpIVli VXlcD5Vh4tiMxJ4WONMFt3f7/53gSXLf24WMwErubc+mGMzgUGE5HKC98PcK UV/5pPggQdzPxCBNeiXnLU1tCGYhPatFTDhUBGaVhBeuUCbgR9gpXJ9guqrD OVwouKvovdIeI5KEAcoAAiSL6naeLk/GbKUaBFa2RxXC17e+YyBWtWlWDEM3 1V8pUIx76lkO8IJYREhLcg/LnyoYy5wcrzI6pbX2vw1x/jR3GHSC1AEdoqbE xui2XLLlSa6y9yQNgdkPz7GTLmpwIT+dMIIF8TCCBNmgAwIBAgIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMF0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAkJFMRkwFwYDVQQK ExBHbG9iYWxTaWduIG52LXNhMTMwMQYDVQQDEypHbG9iYWxTaWduIFBlcnNv bmFsU2lnbiAxIENBIC0gU0hBMjU2IC0gRzMwHhcNMTcwNTI1MDg0NDE2WhcN MjAwNTI1MDg0NDE2WjA8MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMR8w HQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBzYXBlckBzYXBlci5pbmZvMIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEA2sO3aQNus/oe4ZBZ4fu1Y1mzxnUYAkb4k/dw gMFc2Kd0eRoOY0AHj4rTEi/vVzzizxjLbEwXzQ9cBEAu/PqS8WsOmhZXtlfi szPDmP7ZpOwmNTWKSd9O7jHu9uTCGfEOsocQNYH2ULD1gVFkgKb8jHf+3u9d uCzh6qMomTtwLrCGEP70Lq385xUzRaD6qbOeIB99tpzgvMR6Z0GPTt4z8tLM kfdtohq5llwZ5vYnj/hJohVS9iLMQMHW4nuLj/mLZNaYE1CWJBT1rBwn5YPJ uR6811O9eAP7aX4iG8k1jkiBh+QNgGRBIK4GIdqy7IVRhA7v2OlpLYHMk4zP 9Fs3M+56QromVKBnxfzLhuYMUK6ugj9jwskNVitqlEFUeyfgvmR1jnPRp1Nd XGJllTNwGicR8wkaRj14RxfrvTZfwXs8OBODKFupqun/tNzdpOgyHMGQACss 9yv2SnLGCJvJK3rGIdRZEiUhLZH/Ct4L92dBhev+SjUqWKbHb4yIlGMgLdoh nwqatuWw7iyOeInjcinX7ghiIKDWhulUN493Fzl6kaUBtIIcrb7jzZ2pHAQT WUmuVnCTHk6NtoWB09lvuK77fw4GfxLWDFWkBQiJYPVBrmxlrkCKzrWdTMfS W9BiEC10jT1sSimUBIjDz22RkfsApeBJoAIWjiOZogILu9MCAwEAAaOCAdAw ggHMMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDCBngYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgZEwgY4wTQYIKwYB BQUHMAKGQWh0dHA6Ly9zZWN1cmUuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vY2FjZXJ0L2dz cGVyc29uYWxzaWduMXNoYTJnM29jc3AuY3J0MD0GCCsGAQUFBzABhjFodHRw Oi8vb2NzcDIuZ2xvYmFsc2lnbi5jb20vZ3NwZXJzb25hbHNpZ24xc2hhMmcz MEwGA1UdIARFMEMwQQYJKwYBBAGgMgEoMDQwMgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJmh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3Lmdsb2JhbHNpZ24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAw RAYDVR0fBD0wOzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC5nbG9iYWxzaWduLmNvbS9n c3BlcnNvbmFsc2lnbjFzaGEyZzMuY3JsMBsGA1UdEQQUMBKBEHNhcGVyQHNh cGVyLmluZm8wHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMB0GA1Ud DgQWBBReBINaGUKUo7HCrIjsKLKERu6ooTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSWJ8LCpfcc +AJ6emSvY28y0pjCsTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAC0VK968ySq/6B+Kd ecjVThQOKtVXuG17Krfk0xz7OPYR/V+qZtBFm2Uc6tkUEmAmq3Tyf+SE3TTX Q58eJFq0uCTUhIY714ioJs1uVWBz8rPyJ3swkOfDaUXUxkQsBsf73VfKjUk4 kB5MTrApLYUe35NmEY3FqyyX13elhW1tp864vOKM2Git61cYoRn/bwd/z2JM Zkxwkd5JgvmM+p4Da+WO4CUsGzdrZEH8X/8NQIzWtUDIh7VEQZFX5fot/KvH Am8AajtpmNqTfMyg6LfcfJUXSFqXn/KEWu4Td62vX6Pd70dYKUZxnLwYvGqG A4Ktrp9zyrUzxLbmdaPln7CstjGCA38wggN7AgEBMG0wXTELMAkGA1UEBhMC QkUxGTAXBgNVBAoTEEdsb2JhbFNpZ24gbnYtc2ExMzAxBgNVBAMTKkdsb2Jh bFNpZ24gUGVyc29uYWxTaWduIDEgQ0EgLSBTSEEyNTYgLSBHMwIMGk4Oe/1h 2+wMOby/MA0GCWCGSAFlAwQCAQUAoIHkMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE3MDYwMjA3MDY0M1owLwYJKoZIhvcN AQkEMSIEIOIznzo9ZYFKwyITmOPEiJdCsawrdOxtY+jOgssTUV8MMHkGCSqG SIb3DQEJDzFsMGowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBFjALBglghkgB ZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMC AgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIC ADKlOJcFyv5Ik5JjWf22QH6qDTvojI9YJE1M8LekNKsueu0tuVQ9Rp8NZG2B Gmx0e0cDzWpovlYXe8jg54vG7cvBc4voqNK21U/flc5UTYyW3OBRb27pbfhN 91LMtt5u8sV3/z5He1crDGF/mCy04H6/qLXJuX/mcStOu8tjkrD9UjGueMBJ 1LSFEW9/U262qmJ4v6MhLaSh9K5iAlq9T7PZ4XWAYN6w3p/KD00wfkBGlzzj qZb9AF1uGyJqvhTYRT24/W++eyvTdVsDC3UeGqtJpkhaU4b6KJHRWEWlpFEF eAFrusboixfPZ65lW9Q1+W5dUtblX7ujnWxEh6zhW0ZGLvos+mot18pejmi0 qZWfovYjY8uL4g6iZ3IX0eGpAnTfAhjy2BvcW7aRHEWhFpdCUOAhJqufU6OF KqBLV226FqahyHp/cYCt5gxNQdHcYdeL6GcaWRIjBECImBJHQ/wGM5HMuYlv jJ9swmTjxJS8i0ZNso51T2crOgxN2+PeFV3blSbAvJMphh4bwakKThjld9Ng AYzllp7xOTPMvIyA/GenE6lAUEpc7w3KOraIyO1mGmKxGBKb5CeTVvKM/bDr m3wzZi52FwG0Cc8kGQ4dm3emEZ8nytLEu3aImu50xRXg4+pH1BekVjTvGem/ Y8bBuTbLcFrDYgbShDafXeKa --1563967779-157018144-1496387203=:65985-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 09:54:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A709BF3986 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E40EB8172E for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9C8261AAF058; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:54:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: Matthieu Volat Cc: Adam Weinberger , Per olof Ljungmark , FreeBSD Ports References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> <20170601182017.33c1f0f1@freedom.alkumuna.eu> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <01cc16d6-fe6d-6090-8a8c-313e95406617@toco-domains.de> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:54:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170601182017.33c1f0f1@freedom.alkumuna.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 09:54:17 -0000 On 01.06.2017 18:20, Matthieu Volat wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:45:43 +0200 > Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > >> [...] >> Just as a short note: there is a complete rewrite of portmaster ongoing. >> Since its a beast and everything else is very hard there is no public >> evidence in case of failure. ;) Until now. >> >> I'm currently try to convince all persons already got frustrated by >> portmaster-programming to come together and work on it. I'm also working >> at an decent automatic QA for it (and PHP and GitLab). >> > > Hi and thanks, is there a name and a public repository for this initiative? Currently not, but i would just name it simple like "portmaster 2". :D The initiative is at the moment offline, besides various emails. I will meet with another person interested in rewrite and discuss it much more within the next weeks. Also there is a lot of paper with architectural notices, QA-requirements and ideas about what should be done and what not. I will do a public announcement, when we start transferring it into the "wild". My current thought is creating a public repo on my private GitLab. I will use a special CI setup, but since it will need high permissions i need some control about what code went it. I welcome of course every help. Beside the programming we need of course extensive testing and i want to improve the documentation on so many level. Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 09:57:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C40ABF3AA1 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4797F819D9 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 47028BF3A9F; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B26BF3A9E for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374AC819D7 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v529vEfx067297 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v529vEQm067296; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201706020957.v529vEQm067296@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:57:14 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 09:57:14 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ocaml-ipaddr | 2.6.1 | 2.8.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/py-isort | 4.2.5 | 4.2.9 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 10:11:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C078ABF4245 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward4h.cmail.yandex.net (forward4h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7A382138 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp2m.mail.yandex.net (smtp2m.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:2519::122]) by forward4h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6B2CF20D69 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:10:56 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp2m.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 31B2A2300D4B for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:10:55 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp2m.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id ZDb0T6v6aj-AsmOK2CC; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:10:54 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1496398255; bh=y3HZkY0OqAopP6LDXN4KWnDq6ahpaxPoU6QaEqmmcG0=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=QksMaqldjOo3Tf9v39WtrKzxtuHYtHGYj2W+vsS+wf0QpwZGiBQHCt0hevRcCn2dz LMMKiMvE9G7HnLVuYzhEIcqOAhCqSMUJjqq/+/HH30Qw86SFSeL49Xc60lWhPIz6C+ 55vYMlXWqV2goZvfe5cq5c1oZLN6ilZXOF26Z0vw= Authentication-Results: smtp2m.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 Message-ID: <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] From: Stari Karp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:10:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:11:00 -0000 Looks like the new portmaster is coming but what is about Synth? I am the user of Synth and I like to know what the FreeBSD leaders decided, please. Thank you. SK From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 10:24:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E81BF454F for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [IPv6:2604:4500:6:2a6:ec4:7aff:feb5:1bb2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A87826DB for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B0519401EE for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: maurice.jlkmail.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=mailman-hosting.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= mailman-hosting.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :x-mailer:content-type:content-type:references:in-reply-to:date :date:to:from:from:subject:subject:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1496399051; x=1497263052; bh=FMYGr8PgtWmnPuEzDER+UcuaYS4jlbAekJs JZmFWjeM=; b=FcvKTY+gXpT6cHx/W9YIUHOnBjJELHmGEyIWzpRI0JxwSGD7Hc8 +mh8UVr1T2q1Gxbz5n4eoPOp5+3zOV2qi0G2RskiKFNaA/z5uNOSbULjxvL+dXTY xm2olu29NWRayVpHK2o9/0tA38+6ZUMm5NCsL9oXSz3mqE6EyhRuzdYk= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maurice.jlkmail.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.296 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.296 tagged_above=-9999 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.365, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=2.43, RAZOR2_CHECK=2.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nWwI7s-BAirt for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:24:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from yertle.fios-router.home (static-70-104-198-154.nrflva.fios.verizon.net [70.104.198.154]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAB1E18806A0; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:24:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] From: Jim Ohlstein To: Stari Karp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:24:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:24:14 -0000 On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 06:10 -0400, Stari Karp wrote: > Looks like the new portmaster is coming but what is about Synth? I am > the user of Synth and I like to know what the FreeBSD leaders > decided, > please. > The "FreeBSD leaders," in their infinite wisdom, decided to can John Marino. Synth development will likely go on, geared towards Dragonfly. Whether it will support future FreeBSD ports enhancements is anyone's guess. Whether gcc6-aux will ever be fixed for 12-CURRENT and 64 bit inodes is also anyone's guess. Sadly, it is/ was the best option for users looking to migrate to a "modern" tool for whom poudriere was too much. -- Jim Ohlstein Professional Mailman Hosting https://mailman-hosting.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 11:31:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BB9BF5E58 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0EA084B67 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 31DB81AAF058; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:31:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: Jim Ohlstein , Stari Karp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <1f134f08-faf5-b345-fd9e-1fb1bf265c50@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:31:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 11:31:24 -0000 On 02.06.2017 12:24, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 06:10 -0400, Stari Karp wrote: >> Looks like the new portmaster is coming but what is about Synth? I am >> the user of Synth and I like to know what the FreeBSD leaders >> decided, >> please. >> > > The "FreeBSD leaders," in their infinite wisdom, decided to can John > Marino. Synth development will likely go on, geared towards Dragonfly. > Whether it will support future FreeBSD ports enhancements is anyone's > guess. While i can follow the critique i want to say: out of experience in various communities - online and offline: if one project is centered around one single person it will fail. Its just a matter of time and exceptions are rarely. If someone likes synth please support it. Programming is just one single part needed to keep a project alive, even a programming-project. If you feel you are not a programmer, but for example a manager, manage to ask people for support, for feedback, for programming, etc. Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 12:25:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61571BF6FE8 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 400A46EB; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:25:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CB9228ED; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:25:36 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:25:35 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Cc: Jim Ohlstein , Stari Karp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170602122534.GA23458@lonesome.com> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> <1f134f08-faf5-b345-fd9e-1fb1bf265c50@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1f134f08-faf5-b345-fd9e-1fb1bf265c50@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:25:43 -0000 On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 01:31:19PM +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > If someone likes synth please support it. This. Very much this. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 13:30:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58EBBF804A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [207.172.210.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74C862659 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::1f] (haymarket.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::1f]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v52DTIFI006462 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:29:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> From: George Mitchell Message-ID: <4397c017-8f19-b75c-9969-97b7ccfe0536@m5p.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:29:12 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="92SAICg1UbQtFOFdG9feofgusW9wqu2T4" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::f7]); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 09:29:26 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:30:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --92SAICg1UbQtFOFdG9feofgusW9wqu2T4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="AUWwS7w7kewPk5DbQEX0rHMxcb2CEuei1"; protected-headers="v1" From: George Mitchell To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4397c017-8f19-b75c-9969-97b7ccfe0536@m5p.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> In-Reply-To: <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> --AUWwS7w7kewPk5DbQEX0rHMxcb2CEuei1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/02/17 06:24, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > [...] > Sadly, it is/ > was the best option for users looking to migrate to a "modern" tool for= > whom poudriere was too much. >=20 Meaning no disrespect to anyone who makes positive contributions to the FreeBSD project, let's not forget that synth's dependence on Ada is not to be taken lightly either. -- George --AUWwS7w7kewPk5DbQEX0rHMxcb2CEuei1-- --92SAICg1UbQtFOFdG9feofgusW9wqu2T4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZXwRES3m+p4fkFAlkxaC4ACgkQwRES3m+p 4fmFEg//QNlKpYH70Me4qfO8etTwFSaqr9b6x2Zwns+axD/DxFJ0gNEHrvyW48qY RIGNmLhOSnBbuRV/6ZBnRkDYPf2ppOH1yZGs8mpGiGWCnSgD+iWxOZrKTee977Fg 49ioJZuucbM9O4g1+P1G+316z5lCA5QxOF+dujrNRlRghDH9pRq5eMRcgYh8w3LQ IN07DPFmUNhWezT7v78dIUQa7QRGecyeicX4iMuADgZfvC2ARU5+aSarBTWnj9U1 PCJCwWhwjQvlqxbQeYigMYLRlNQwQQL0ptBWrJZAa/Jiy+2slUDLfFPzTagpgs5e neQVcsR0GAUAIoR+3XWnrm0HUOJGFtVwQRunWsc12l9FxYJZ6iqsiJyxZj+/CvVr 9+hkupiiCghPq8VEs6e0kLc3DZOtK+fzY4W1AFQywxkeSEsN4WNk6dCeKtCoz3ZK dXzasvb8d0JwSEhkkjpHhP5VU/AcSZ2MN5y69VpZaXuiyPys8CZOtJEuJSGRHJYE 6x5LDsDc8KBmhYpiW5G8klUkcd6JW83f+1riypxuGVUexM5F9NAuI/lg458O+g0P 3sWupLsWt0IInISTa1xVsZEYgb5toKiiOX7OiqU9rotEyN92Dmtamk6e9qJisGfP jqZmmAXJ9s8W7FS0JJHqJi44DAnc1aQdKgJ6UiRihaYLvJl4+CU= =hf/S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --92SAICg1UbQtFOFdG9feofgusW9wqu2T4-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 14:29:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2621BF8BFD for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from erza.lautre.net (erza.lautre.net [80.67.160.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.lautre.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A593C6422F for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [78.225.128.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by erza.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97011FDF0D for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:27:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 53FFA48C81; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:29:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:29:40 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170602142940.GD26373@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE amd64 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xF1C516B3C8359753 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:29:45 -0000 Le jeu. 1 juin 17 à 15:45:43 +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff écrivait : > Just as a short note: there is a complete rewrite of portmaster ongoing. > Since its a beast and everything else is very hard there is no public > evidence in case of failure. ;) Until now. I've been using portupgrade and then portmaster for a long time. I can understand the need for such tools when you have to build ports with non-default options. But I have a naive question: if pkg supports flavours, and binary packages are built for your sets of options, is portmaster still relevant? -- Th. Thomas. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 14:38:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93C2BF8ECF for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 734D5647BE for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A1C171AAF058 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:38:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> <20170602142940.GD26373@graf.pompo.net> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <710e4d8f-8ee6-500a-2741-4f6f0e83de32@toco-domains.de> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:38:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170602142940.GD26373@graf.pompo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:38:43 -0000 On 02.06.2017 16:29, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le jeu. 1 juin 17 à 15:45:43 +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff > écrivait : > >> Just as a short note: there is a complete rewrite of portmaster ongoing. >> Since its a beast and everything else is very hard there is no public >> evidence in case of failure. ;) Until now. > > I've been using portupgrade and then portmaster for a long time. I can > understand the need for such tools when you have to build ports with > non-default options. > > But I have a naive question: if pkg supports flavours, and binary > packages are built for your sets of options, is portmaster still > relevant? No, but most portmaster user do not have the default set of options. And flavours do not change the options of binary packages - as far as i understand. The should solve problems like having multiple ports of the same programm but for php 5.6, 7.0 and 7.1 at the same time. Or for different python or ruby versions. Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 15:17:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153B1BF991A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward5h.cmail.yandex.net (forward5h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23D365C74 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (smtp1o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::25]) by forward5h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7288120EB6; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:17:23 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8A24F1300BA6; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:17:21 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id nZ6GxEQr6t-HKU4XLvD; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 18:17:20 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1496416640; bh=XWtn9frzdlEnVT1lxDMnYzm57Qx4scbeh0Dnv7maz+U=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=QRFFz706JrICeAXPOL4wWCJB9B/ITgKMxIWQuj8R5Th6EZpHAQXnHYEA7DkfxJ9zq KF7W9tr0f6V8fdpJplVkIyiEUJjCeqLP3qcKFN8kSm6wDzeCJFa4u8rI1bS2jQ31dC OewSw5IkVdD8SK85ZbpXD/QmJJhRVinKTw/fCnGg= Authentication-Results: smtp1o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0 Message-ID: <1496416638.48606.1.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] From: Stari Karp To: Jim Ohlstein , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 11:17:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:17:35 -0000 On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 06:24 -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 06:10 -0400, Stari Karp wrote: > > Looks like the new portmaster is coming but what is about Synth? I > > am > > the user of Synth and I like to know what the FreeBSD leaders > > decided, > > please. > > > > The "FreeBSD leaders," in their infinite wisdom, decided to can John > Marino. Synth development will likely go on, geared towards > Dragonfly. > Whether it will support future FreeBSD ports enhancements is anyone's > guess. Whether gcc6-aux will ever be fixed for 12-CURRENT and 64 bit > inodes is also anyone's guess. > > Sadly, it is/ > was the best option for users looking to migrate to a "modern" tool > for > whom poudriere was too much. > I did install Dragonfly too and for my needs is very good. I am buying a new ssd drive and I will installed os from scratch. And I knew what happened with John Marino. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 16:33:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDBBBFAF2A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFEC66A285 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v52GXH7P080331 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:33:17 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v52GXHpa080330 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:33:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:33:17 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] Message-ID: <20170602163317.GL1528@albert.catwhisker.org> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> <20170602142940.GD26373@graf.pompo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oImBTl0TNA0mSDFD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170602142940.GD26373@graf.pompo.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:33:26 -0000 --oImBTl0TNA0mSDFD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:29:40PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > ... > But I have a naive question: if pkg supports flavours, and binary > packages are built for your sets of options, is portmaster still > relevant? > .... Well, that depends... e.g., on one's set of requirements (and how they are weighted). In my own case, I believe portmaster is still relevant. That said, I doubt that many would have my particular set of requirements -- and that of the few who might, very few would weight them at all similarly. To provide a bit of context: On the systems where I use portmaster, I also maintain private mirrors of the FreeBSD SVN repositories, which are updated (only) overnight. On a daily basis (on these machines -- one of which is a designated "build machine"; the other is my laptop) I: * Update the /usr/ports working copy. * Update the stable/11 /usr/src working copy. * Perform a src-based update to stable/11 (& reboot). * While that is running, fetch the distfiles I'll be needing later (e.g. "portmaster -aF"). * Update all installed ports (e.g., "portmaster -ad"). * Update the "head" slice's /usr/src working copy. * Reboot to the "head" slice. * Perform a src-based update to head (& reboot). * For the build machine, set the default boot slice to stable/11 & poweroff; for the laptop, reboot to stable/11, then use it for the rest of the day. Please note that I am NOT recommending any of this to anyone else. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Looking forward to telling Mr. Trump: "You're fired!" See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --oImBTl0TNA0mSDFD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJZMZNNXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRDQ0I3Q0VGOTE3QTgwMUY0MzA2NEQ3N0Ix NTM5Q0M0MEEwNDlFRTE3AAoJEBU5zECgSe4XHtYH/1n3UEdJfTWCfYU1F+3bVmRv j7fTwtbw1+pIlmSqLMhUY7tbOFaK6PWlN73qMWAQBCACvtmkFJ0WMA+gM+vXeye9 3hT+a6JoQihujXoy8TzNcYNlZ1wP1rLXfImXDO+Sb6YLLZm2KxbJZlQkZ2mtj+z3 CJD0/r8hZbZoK9qxf9zTfM29TQ5bSKyEktWl0vAedIJHm1l1/n7Ix5xDUTD5qYvY wJ7Pe2+18UGQFiPSBWfAJCzL1F00pECqBUQ/AOygFqFfjgudyrVW2bfADRXpt8g6 fXmw5LXvlk1+69bbdFAoMIhE/yc+eQxWIP53a8ClaggXuKIClchsW3YwOKh4dbM= =TWxG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oImBTl0TNA0mSDFD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 19:03:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FCBAF9B20 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22c.google.com (mail-it0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C2F73D58 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m47so15339719iti.1 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:03:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mIbTB6RAU30l5GfbkV4olqsFQNCmPm9I8F2+D3UCkDE=; b=PmsNFOqAITKH7mi6KAA+0pe5KaCG7DKNwnM09Nk7T4fXgE6wAhqY2dKu2KHTMXM272 i0jFKZkDqRP7T52fCwViLe+O9d+nVOCAYWKyEVxvEhaMm8QcwWgG2qNCxhi1RUPci3nj 966xn8V2k9sECN8H2dJitmC+FmrKTby2yO3t4wKzMcL7ft7K0x/MSZoCW6liwgQuMIta GNbxuOcfE4JkQnMfMeAhuqDoOzvwztM+FwG62rfq9ZhEy3s71MIFIGqAAu4Mg0MZFAcU Or8ugiHL7bRjW9c0Zos6rJR3H7/lrqHb1r3T8P8vjwOeqU/V2Wiv1fZW9BfELKeu9MMp 3RMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mIbTB6RAU30l5GfbkV4olqsFQNCmPm9I8F2+D3UCkDE=; b=Bh0TiYx4pv1REbf3OUS2CPoh0G1TKaWdtOgZ07aLSrYOcRFz8o8qYNM3Ktty2TtCcR ogxjhcC2AVb0YXBHxBqRu+W4/MfEupufltAF7tgRqwlUAirh4VV60QvP7TKU5EUaOst/ UiIJrLHrPCVmUcqISNXW1RY5wJg51QdpflHhcC1cJiMzEwZ4JzB3tZrxO6RCm2ImB9tb 4vgQLbCmvWFIU3QoCEQfCJLpOcJrbm+V9Y28KmcAEyrM0bgNE6x6yXuUyGNGzacSFran o/Mo3IbyvPAddvP3tCOPpk07ZTARxx3Io3bP04FeKerWeW01gPA4VtD+oE/Q1oksNIQv c0Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDGt2WJDAkCuzoSqEB3vg8jG60FSEyFl6pPaEPATab6vB6M/7u3 zu8mfOGYpNzjLvcw+iUbtxlnU/WHJA== X-Received: by 10.36.93.141 with SMTP id w135mr866219ita.27.1496430225996; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:03:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <20170530200629.GA10517@lonesome.com> <20170530215306.GB11098@lonesome.com> <9499F327-172A-4E04-B446-05EE5F08CC51@adamw.org> <20a46aff-b313-9253-8461-6d4d8f28a000@toco-domains.de> <20170602142940.GD26373@graf.pompo.net> <20170602163317.GL1528@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20170602163317.GL1528@albert.catwhisker.org> From: Dewayne Geraghty Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 19:03:35 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 19:03:47 -0000 Your use case is very similar to others that manage servers, particularly on behalf of others. We also rebuilt nightly , if any vulnerabilities were discovered we'd test and push to clients' servers. :) Cheers. -- *Disclaimer:* *As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is not confidential. Any intermediary or recipient may inspect, modify (add), copy, forward, reply to, delete, or filter email for any purpose unless said parties are otherwise obligated. Nothing in this message may be legally binding without cryptographic evidence of its integrity and/or confidentiality.* From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 19:19:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1118AF9E25 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95E327449D for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d127so34000714wmf.0 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=woMZU0eFX5cfqSmp8pWGNHBRSWOTevLpx3kUqV7zFMg=; b=KLxpDtY98ewSxb+CkAQOliBPmwmgbu/i7IawwOeRySTk7CxjZYUrMaQMt7LlVWZ7Ex B+84q7JLmQUufgYwkUH0tGrZqXjrqS2Nnf+7Pgb/ZGlWxkJLa3tLJ2jIBMD6t1awjDyP n93xhpFAJH5oJzW7AvNItVK+fVRbN63AUuwE8p+PumVRfjD70jLC3QSPOfPCgEZBs7Tn 5KUEQErxuUQOkE6ZyG/54A2olUgU+dz4DbyXNlCh1WNt02jh6MtSWvmNM6mSY+Z4HIy+ CNpYIPedlp9IS1S4bSnYKlL4vXA78M67LH/SmDDWdu2PpdH+HjlZidpJ4lyRhlPTVOr0 PNJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=woMZU0eFX5cfqSmp8pWGNHBRSWOTevLpx3kUqV7zFMg=; b=cGf24rPmggK7+tu31ZFrrXNXXwS73d40VkORK8SKG0RbpBPExqyFBEl+nEhykkWR1Q MJSzDh7WszPEGy94gkAbcovvacHKCtNHQMSik97TL4okiXKnKzzVUwxXLSLBGt+lPo9u rSUsmymXdQi/vNhsnl7IHEZPPAKpJXW+kaSViVtUHQJpZXkYy6ba3CBxaT+daJ0fyheO hoRQDjgx+iKsZXJ0ujwa8EMDIDJ6hBBOyS+ZxNg6KbTfQqZCiGt7H7AgViQhr8umTomY vBBQBVe5KnGDdtcbnkNrJqnmsMCQmA5bKWq2yHQfkksSdCi2h0yp1nNW9CeE9To1oK0g zvcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDnq8aitZfFkC2QLJ36O0wrBVXd6K27aGvf0pXF7AVJmvkf0r9J 7OJPw0sv2fWKTBvi4Gg= X-Received: by 10.80.167.4 with SMTP id h4mr7136841edc.142.1496431138854; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rsbsd ([24.133.238.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm15976369eda.63.2017.06.02.12.18.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "Raif S. Berent" Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 22:18:56 +0300 From: Beeblebrox To: Subject: Finding depends-on ports Message-ID: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 19:19:02 -0000 I'm running a default-settings ports build from a ports-list file in poudriere (-f /path/file), which means no options have been defined by "# make config" or by make.conf (empty /var/db/ports, so can't look there). Is there an easy way to find or back-trace which forward ports depend on a certain port without running configure for the whole list? The only thing I could think of is to write a shell script like:=20 cat file-name | while read line make -C $line all-depends-list | grep printf $stuff > outfile Regards --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_12-Current_RadeonKMS Please CC my email when responding, mail from list is not delivered. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 20:42:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81E0AFB38A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9321A76D58 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED4EB38EE for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/ED4EB38EE; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Finding depends-on ports To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <041788a2-a80b-c81b-1cef-0b7e3eea37d0@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:42:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XQHnRc1E1IoFJUlQx1Udk1owJEQBQa0WJ" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:42:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XQHnRc1E1IoFJUlQx1Udk1owJEQBQa0WJ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dXKkX4Hws781G8jJEJ50Otogp7gxo0Onm"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <041788a2-a80b-c81b-1cef-0b7e3eea37d0@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Finding depends-on ports References: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> In-Reply-To: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> --dXKkX4Hws781G8jJEJ50Otogp7gxo0Onm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/06/2017 20:18, Beeblebrox via freebsd-ports wrote: > I'm running a default-settings ports build from a ports-list file in > poudriere (-f /path/file), which means no options have been defined by > "# make config" or by make.conf (empty /var/db/ports, so can't look > there). >=20 > Is there an easy way to find or back-trace which forward ports depend o= n > a certain port without running configure for the whole list? The only > thing I could think of is to write a shell script like:=20 > cat file-name | while read line > make -C $line all-depends-list | grep > printf $stuff > outfile If you pull down the ports INDEX by 'make fetchindex' it's a simple matter of cut(1) and grep(1) to find all the ports that depend on some other port. Matching that up to the list of ports you have in your build list is a job for comm(1). Cheers, Matthew --dXKkX4Hws781G8jJEJ50Otogp7gxo0Onm-- --XQHnRc1E1IoFJUlQx1Udk1owJEQBQa0WJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJZMc2zXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATuHcP/RG7hTZdIdCjVwZuDrSXTBY5 UG3/XdPsfJlEHo/pJQgHx4iwFpU28EGZkMnKHZl9pMu+2+yDVM4OFONjvL00Qd5c cTOVS61TYAwbOaRsusQdssbHE4UUF4bCZnogzDCqdrjMvocNqsGydoKMVieVVQIp +P/dFwD4wbnbsGjQB1NawUrQ0werzTJxWG+k5c/JJJ3vgiD7uxnwll0MkvGkcifg sHZvQFFGtktIJrAzVLJfk28zRZjH4Xd73HtGsTg52QTBqzgebhgtsFXrk1t/sOxI o+x5PbaRg0wb+EZEpDHpRvC2lEkYUkoVUbBtWpWyOMkTVJWHrOEccGHb2lMDXDCv aAunjECBKuC4B0fSbeBPqUbNq0T2bECW2uqGFCO3HZ50rbYcExfZZe7AHZ61ClM7 P6eTyAOpXqOhZEN3tQ+4+nQ8o/n7OuvK5t4MKuWUu4xYHiQepQHHFaBmL24UqaSX OY51srIdkFVxOzJhs4FXMwBwxpvlGUd7HHY7cr48XX7U9wIGXzIPu2C/cWCr6/t8 mK3k5T0ESstaDfYSuXR9ZRm2byeA0C7crMaSMuFQLqUdD0RVMA+QLq9yB3+CdFOO pwP7/IPSYe4gYJXYFuRHYPe5zkhRme9OLpMNJroj8B99qPAq3NdfDD3jj+zc/NxW v6YQKyB68UC2i640v+dT =qVjS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XQHnRc1E1IoFJUlQx1Udk1owJEQBQa0WJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 2 20:58:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9DAAFB586 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com", Issuer "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6447724A for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from [74.134.208.22] ([74.134.208.22:48865] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-omsmta02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 79/37-27444-461D1395; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:58:13 +0000 Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:57:44 +0000 Message-ID: <79.37.27444.461D1395@dnvrco-omsmta02> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth] References: <201705301351.v4UDpHwY048949@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <9FEDBFCE-27D1-432B-926B-7BF401AD7B19@adamw.org> <589B133C-0175-4DD2-8847-5A3E0E697B36@dsl-only.net> <1496236662.1196.1.camel@mailman-hosting.com> <1496398252.20031.1.camel@yandex.com> <1496399049.1994.10.camel@mailman-hosting.com> <1496416638.48606.1.camel@yandex.com> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.7:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:58:20 -0000 from Stari Karp: > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 06:24 -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 06:10 -0400, Stari Karp wrote: > > > Looks like the new portmaster is coming but what is about Synth? I am > > > the user of Synth and I like to know what the FreeBSD leaders decided, please. > > The "FreeBSD leaders," in their infinite wisdom, decided to can John > > Marino. Synth development will likely go on, geared towards Dragonfly. > > Whether it will support future FreeBSD ports enhancements is anyone's > > guess. Whether gcc6-aux will ever be fixed for 12-CURRENT and 64 bit > > inodes is also anyone's guess. > > Sadly, it is/ > > was the best option for users looking to migrate to a "modern" tool for > > whom poudriere was too much. > I did install Dragonfly too and for my needs is very good. I am buying > a new ssd drive and I will installed os from scratch. And I knew what > happened with John Marino. One problem I had with DragonFlyBSD was that I couldn't mount/read a NetBSD or FreeBSD partition, and FreeBSD and NetBSD couldn't mount/read a DragonFly partition. That was on the DragonFly boot image written to USB stick, last version was somewhere before 4.4. Latest experience (4.4.x) was that DragonFly installation boot image, written to USB stick, hung on boot. I checked ports-mgmt/synth/Makefile for DPorts on github.com and see MAINTAINER= ericturgeon.bsd@gmail.com but for pkgsrc-synth/pkgtools/synth in (NetBSD) pkgsrc, MAINTAINER= draco@marino.st HOMEPAGE= https://github.com/jrmarino/synth I was not behind the scenes to judge who was right and who was wrong in the John Marino debacle. It seems nobody in NetBSD, except John Marino, uses pkg or synth with pkgsrc, so if I try and need help, there would be no community to help. 64-bit inodes are not the only snag in 12-CURRENT. Remember pkgbase, originally planned for 11.0-RELEASE? I'll have to see what I can do with 11-STABLE and let 12-CURRENT wait on hold. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 3 08:31:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14BEBD3495 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6976465B for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BBB8FBD3493; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B31BD3492 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD1E6465A for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v538VhvP051625 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v538VhpQ051624; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201706030831.v538VhpQ051624@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:31:43 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 08:31:43 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/py-isort | 4.2.5 | 4.2.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ security/libzrtpcppcore | 4.6.4 | v4.6.6 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 3 20:45:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC80ABF8CA5 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 20:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22b.google.com (mail-it0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA637D80C for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 20:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id r63so46962351itc.1 for ; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G6cGp7LtIaZzN9QNxiD2CHnj5zvH/rxHOTAKnEuWlTE=; b=oLadm4jPlxZa7fV2+P8p8sX6dlqG9RfVqwxVvRJBcS/AaLKim3TVmIIMuy2er4ua4H WqGjZwr75YWVueC09OnrVe/MYy8sStW3wPkMuF1DTO1Q8TO28mWXJyFNZyIWwar3KtYe 8pPkaSOsl6fuwHwoeTdYBtC6VzZslrxyIjL+5cSFicoZoH+u3Rbl8b2w0lTexy3iuowr A5SHiJAzwMbKiNYjPMGpnqqliJV7DZf4TPDMuotV6mHlRKScSoisf5jkffjBJ/lvWkdP SR//OzZBkm16NylSN4sC8tTQIU5y+UIXqfUuqc8NubqaYH86uvQbYwY9rnW6T3f+42uJ i2ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G6cGp7LtIaZzN9QNxiD2CHnj5zvH/rxHOTAKnEuWlTE=; b=Jdt/j9QxkDU40GEZea5BqrF/2zvedfco92FKxhhKunG7tFXTH5cMXpKSLC9g1DBODY lYOfbJKv5gaVBU/9smKbL1/nsGt6ckqCvxRqnboeRtM0adpt6Kk7vP2G5tPIKrIEJPTG H+NEF9I0IddpWuNsT7aXgCee1pPoudx/4Iznok+oN8SI9Ozl+9JRjaycHKPBI5Ve5Yif znvTE/c3useAzZkYW84EH8mPcx+WmEvqCIbMWkUDj8jtxT5XC/EeUkkengk5vv1jisOT z6lgDekYn8A67eJDhU/U9rLdhzcAGiFNS2zrqJ0AjtNo7PWZX1GJ2YMLCR4A8eUNpNqs 6V1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDJ4CCWI1CPv3zM5XBEAP5F2HcBtgJSlvIwwrrChVpWEsyliSlS P3iR/F56NBP2aw8eMFo= X-Received: by 10.107.186.133 with SMTP id k127mr14495018iof.83.1496522699449; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rsbsd ([24.133.238.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h76sm2885317ith.24.2017.06.03.13.44.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "Raif S. Berent" Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:44:51 +0300 From: Beeblebrox To: Subject: Re: Finding depends-on ports Message-ID: <20170603234451.37318f11@rsbsd> In-Reply-To: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> References: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 20:45:00 -0000 Thanks Matt for the suggestion, INDEX is a very good idea I am unable to figure out how to map package name to port name though as INDEX does not store origins. Any suggestions? Thanks again --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_12-Current_RadeonKMS Please CC my email when responding, mail from list is not delivered. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 3 20:59:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D07BF904C for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 20:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3792C7DDF1 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 20:59:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a89354e9 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:59:37 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: Finding depends-on ports From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20170603234451.37318f11@rsbsd> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:59:36 -0600 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> <20170603234451.37318f11@rsbsd> To: Beeblebrox X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 20:59:45 -0000 > On 3 Jun, 2017, at 14:44, Beeblebrox via freebsd-ports = wrote: >=20 > Thanks Matt for the suggestion, INDEX is a very good idea >=20 > I am unable to figure out how to map package name to port name though > as INDEX does not store origins. Any suggestions? freshports.org lists all ports that depend on a specific port, which = might make things simpler for you. INDEX does store origins---it's the second field. Loop on dependency = packages and grep for lines that start with that package name, and cut = the second field. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 3 21:38:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ED3BF981E for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E9C47EBBF for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id r63so47429015itc.1 for ; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:38:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:date:from:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eiqp/3Rue0gg+bYKHOCjH1KRInncfAOoWlzGv409Sws=; b=bUo80XYf2rozr8Um1qBXvue7BWkkqBVS4WgaUSZxlHBw+MYptFHuBHfc+5cJZKa8nu yMJHF8PEc4ucubbulZgAh+NBqnnCWwWxIBx1MS4ttGp/9LNl3AuGvWPr1YX2KbjWpOnQ vF+9uDWjVFa6YAyjB+y0wMgN3dHk2nSmHQIO4HlokSmDBgrQQNIqk9vJ3ymMxgxjK0Mw oUXO0w/bk+AL5WoZhEkhMVNiRPcbF0izbr34Ppr/ysAW/311BOfwkxertNtsowIQCrqm 8s90F5Zcm7sNxS8GlWyWnFKQA/sQ1B5JUK1z6KhxK7JFNqnNwsSv8ue5WlMbbE1kvV2q 404Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:cc:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eiqp/3Rue0gg+bYKHOCjH1KRInncfAOoWlzGv409Sws=; b=eeYJCl5brR5Wq/iF9HTgSojAHWinx5vxhnTujbBrZW482XKMNQEWTNqnYW3XtOvZ3U 409pahBPMXAd2keUkL0yUv96/623KR+i3cTmDLpYQ07RTASKKBPSwtU/I3DuR8A4YCAb FfzSeJwWTUvkXBazNqE+D6vcMoj0hd5RgLWHGGGc+zeAp26dUj97UdhY8e/q77+phBCs 6bFkYSJi7D0lTKsisjjmVy1qpDArou1sN/FnUUxWmQ/LiYDztA8xDtlMsvKLrGFN3MqM od2PfSJR9mkwfhKAdzD30fmJRenIGCe+SpR/rio7iGWBPoeMuC9HjRpjytSQUo0JcjNr t70g== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcA5kpiKu+UvpkBdnp+qtqYEOFtpv3RSwdkUGOWPI9QcwwasUAp2 gHKWRM97CRXNmjNNCBY= X-Received: by 10.107.27.21 with SMTP id b21mr13982853iob.65.1496525889137; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rsbsd ([24.133.238.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y93sm2913035ita.9.2017.06.03.14.38.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:38:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "Raif S. Berent" Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 00:38:06 +0300 From: Beeblebrox Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding depends-on ports Message-ID: <20170604003806.5010b985@rsbsd> In-Reply-To: References: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> <20170603234451.37318f11@rsbsd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 21:38:10 -0000 On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:59:36 -0600 Thans Adam, but I need origin of depends-on, not the port its self. For example: # grep security/clamav INDEX-12 > clamav-0.99.2_4|/usr/ports/security/clamav|/usr/local|Command line virus scanner written entirely in C|/usr/ports/security/clamav/pkg-descr|ga= rga@FreeBSD.org|security|ca_root_nss-3.30.2 curl-7.54.0 gmake-4.2.1_1 index= info-0.2.6 json-c-0.12.1 libltdl-2.4.6 libnghttp2-1.23.1 libxml2-2.9.4 ncurses-6.0_3 pcre-8.40|arc-5.21p arj-3.10.= 22_4 ca_root_nss-3.30.2 curl-7.54.0 json-c-0.12.1 lha-1.14i_7 libltdl-2.4.6= libnghttp2-1.23.1 libxml2-2.9.4 ncurses-6.0_3 pcre-8.40 unzoo-4.4_2|http:/= /www.clamav.net/||| The dependent packages after Maintainer field only list package names with version, not the origins. Thus I would have to map, for example, "arj-3.10.22_4" to archivers/arj Regards --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_12-Current_RadeonKMS Please CC my email when responding, mail from list is not delivered. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 3 21:56:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024CBBF9BD7 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 426A77F3BD for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a7da2cfc TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:55:56 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: Finding depends-on ports From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20170604003806.5010b985@rsbsd> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 15:55:55 -0600 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <53907A0D-01DF-4822-8D53-6A890FBA3939@adamw.org> References: <20170602221856.5f239d23@rsbsd> <20170603234451.37318f11@rsbsd> <20170604003806.5010b985@rsbsd> To: Beeblebrox X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 21:56:00 -0000 > On 3 Jun, 2017, at 15:38, Beeblebrox via freebsd-ports = wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:59:36 -0600 > Thans Adam, but I need origin of depends-on, not the port its self. > For example: # grep security/clamav INDEX-12 > >=20 > clamav-0.99.2_4|/usr/ports/security/clamav|/usr/local|Command line > virus scanner written entirely in = C|/usr/ports/security/clamav/pkg-descr|garga@FreeBSD.org|security|ca_root_= nss-3.30.2 curl-7.54.0 gmake-4.2.1_1 indexinfo-0.2.6 json-c-0.12.1 = libltdl-2.4.6 > libnghttp2-1.23.1 libxml2-2.9.4 ncurses-6.0_3 pcre-8.40|arc-5.21p = arj-3.10.22_4 ca_root_nss-3.30.2 curl-7.54.0 json-c-0.12.1 lha-1.14i_7 = libltdl-2.4.6 libnghttp2-1.23.1 libxml2-2.9.4 ncurses-6.0_3 pcre-8.40 = unzoo-4.4_2|http://www.clamav.net/||| >=20 > The dependent packages after Maintainer field only list package > names with version, not the origins. Thus I would have to map, for > example, "arj-3.10.22_4" to archivers/arj for dep in $(grep 'security/clamav|' /usr/ports/INDEX-12 | cut -f9 = -d\|); do grep "^$dep" /usr/ports/INDEX-12 | cut -f2 -d\| done Or, much faster: egrep "^($(fgrep 'security/clamav|' /usr/ports/INDEX-12 | cut -f9 -d\| | = tr ' ' '|'))" /usr/ports/INDEX-12 | cut -f2 -d\| # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 3 23:28:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21480BFAD69 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C45E8139F for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 08EA2BFAD68; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08022BFAD66; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [91.220.196.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF9BB8139D; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:28:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com) Received: from [10.9.9.127] (helo=rmmprod05.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHITG-0005ao-Af; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 01:28:38 +0200 Received: from mail by rmmprod05.runbox with local (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHITG-0006Jk-9e; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 01:28:38 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [Authenticated user (846156)] by runbox.com with http (RMM6); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 23:28:38 GMT From: "Jeffrey Bouquet" To: "current" CC: "ports" Subject: undefined symbol 'stat' Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:28:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: RMM6 Message-Id: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 23:28:48 -0000 The latest pkg updates broke firefox here, which won't build [ patches f= ail to apply ] Also seamonkey, but building sqlite3 locally fixed that. =20=20 [ not that I'd expect firefox to build anyway, not been that lucky recent= ly... ]=20 Web search turns up no 'undefined symbol stat' on 12.0-CURRENT that I can= find. Subject give the entirety of the error.=20 Building webkit-gtk2 locally as of now to try to fix it in a third round = of ports. ...=20=