From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sun Dec 10 00:08:38 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF6CE9CF14
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:08:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com)
Received: from cdptpa-cmomta01.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com
 [107.14.166.228])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E537B2E2
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com)
Received: from raspberrypi.bildanet.com ([65.186.81.207]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP
 id Np7ZeXsSGfiK5Np7ce3eS7; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:05:32 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.143]
 by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84)
 (envelope-from <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com>) id 1eNpAX-0007wy-8V
 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:08:33 +0000
Subject: Re: looks like I am no longer welcome around here
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <CALM2mEkgjZ2XdiRvuT1364zWOZ4XY_6KSAg9dTqREK3cQKjWAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171209135853.a6c104f5.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <d9656b09-14b5-390b-6c7f-3ae3a4c123da@columbus.rr.com>
 <CAGBxaXmedH15y9NLTMEQqnTP=BvA_KXnmN6tN5DL7MxJAxN3pA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BN6PR2001MB173049BDDB7C9C6B5E17366F80310@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
 <20171209160730.GA3370@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
 <20171209195258.d4727a94.freebsd@edvax.de>
From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com>
Message-ID: <e2fd4718-271d-9d06-a473-f7d8c2971e59@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 19:08:28 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171209195258.d4727a94.freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAKPo2OmaJWeSv0M26NJQF/ZUHICw+WSBc+0/ZUkeUPRgBd2Q0nksrkR+bbGUjuSWkhcz7wYeWh6a8fAKr7R1iVe8sbsg9vLH2nNV4R9Vs1BGLP+X30q
 QV5+GfC6Fhiwp8tgL8MS8saGVOrFE24/pdkYzhwR70Oyqp2Av+mrtpYFWZplFxHHyhXh1zT+tHEV4f4IE+OstB1tw8i3UmgQmCk=
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:08:38 -0000

On 12/9/2017 1:52 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 23:07:30 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> Carmel NY wrote:
>>> Just my own opinion; however, I do not consider synth, unlike poudriere, to be bloated.
>> I don't even consider poudriere bloated. It is neat, does not require
>> weird dependencies or GUI libs, stores its configuration in text
>> files, uses the standard ports and jail infrastructure. Why would
>> anyone call it bloated?
> Not exactly bloated, but it could be considered "overhead"
> just to build one or two ports. However, Poudriere is not
> intended as a replacement for portmaster or portmanager,
> that's important to keep in mind. And for the specific
> case I mentioned, local repositories and restricted lists
> are the way to go. If even that's too much, the classic
> "make install" and "pkg lock" will probably be okay.
>
Which is what synth is good for.  I am not going to get into the 
contraversy surrounding synth.