From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 03:05:54 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7A2EB3E79 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F987810B for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4358EEB3E76; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43099EB3E75 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from out1-5.antispamcloud.com (out1-5.antispamcloud.com [185.201.16.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F4378105 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from [153.92.8.106] (helo=srv31.niagahoster.com) by mx36.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ed3ko-0005ca-3N for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 01:44:59 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sumeritec.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=sHJbEePAdLyRKygl1+Bx+Kvmaz/xKelSvfZeihtE7B8=; b=bzA15cDCbKIF/m3ASJB3akIn+D 7PKd95HCVgl9FmdVLSvuSMyX2O9VN6rMnE/VAtCAUPQK42iG5UsVIAEhZbm8mMkK1L7zWx6PHLRSK 52XB1jCr1mFTiBCFApFSgw8R+zNSjV19LiBQXx+/QY4wIJBQ/eeqEGxI2uhbs+pLdMaD0htaYZLZ5 9wPLRl2eAWPK52aAc0pczFscW+vXv9uhKPbGf1VD14CNykm4Nc+E9BpU0S2ZJJSW34ujJPAQDUquF 4+VMww7kxSOuZauEwyTPZL76qnltG51gLIMnp78TI+VrtI4oYu0rCPaa6cyhSI0pH+NGFZFv+lcyF 88XMzbZw==; Received: from [114.125.86.159] (port=18903 helo=X220.sumeritec.com) by srv31.niagahoster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ed3k3-0003Ju-8M; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:44:11 +0700 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:44:00 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Guido Falsi Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: mousepad memory leak Message-ID: <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> In-Reply-To: <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> References: <20180119140623.3a8116cc.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AuthUser: freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com X-Originating-IP: 153.92.8.106 X-AntiSpamCloud-Domain: out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Username: niaga Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=niaga@out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.42) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5qwIa4LqWM3XETe8GNEhNJMXv9krsgRhBn0ayn6qsUc7I5ZqWWdJz7N9 akKGbGS0o+uU1BmoHjMBQ3n6s1gbXgyNMFJAGzyB46YOKeij0tSmzWklAAjrby83HqYGW2NKQ2pJ qmRxoq516XRnFFB5q4GnG+eTs8kbKBy2XcsLzqKfOtR4tWDzNDnQFaD8d4+NGMYgHCJIwuGa4wHu gME1sRS0TELXlsHmbQud29jV/a+DpiRGJYe7hjeOeS20uBa0Ht+yaoSwa57PcuqfCGlvO5egsseA 5eHMmH97Mx9OFBI5RgudzGUUerEAVH/t0RiO6pxfwYHYuG/6nWZTso9YzDzsj5xBssn0tIIHA3aH QzCqWIPa7gCjqD58JsuMBvF7SallWDcUuJsrtYMZxyQZ5rrHJLAog+xhoE1SNtiS0/scR64dodD7 udB+zcx8OjSt1WC/I78nlgPRLEb1egqo3jwSjoXDm2V1p5BMPuhfQhsmI5iSiV2fpzn1SBcNY9eT PjYqB6D2RmuDPoFaEW17o3ko+qWjHO9kxCVU6ivMSZAdB5hQ6nsDvccjqgmDvD9Wh0RmhkQ6rae1 T+oDW89lCVVWA+dUn9dXN5gVyYb8Xop7du6wRhs3xkdsDZoNCg+zXnSl7QKP5pmxQPEqAkoWF/Ic SyO1Wl59p9ZTVufmcETTctgzcDoFd+96Xw4QUNtTnTJh2GnMLWppjS2Jv8fq72Sg8jVgnxj8ihgx 8NFJ5YvRwsj2KGN+cJhYZzXnyvl3ARiXYpmGRqLoqCVipDGlRxqgU66xIU04MR5oAYbB/7jfK/kC Taq+75E4A7X8JDq81eRp5+Ss4q7+2PHchLPerbAZzoOjXjsSkBAXI76FjEzk3mGyjSnaoQr28ssf ojBfD2FgYQviufKbvaomkka1MBg= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.antispamcloud.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:05:54 -0000 Hi, On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:46:41 +0100 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 01/19/2018 08:41, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > when I open more than nine or ten mousepads in parallel, I can still > > use one or two of the open windows but the other mousepad windows > > start to allocate memory until it is exhausted. > > It's not easy to diagnose such a problem for people not knowing the > details of mousepad sources and the libraries it uses. I know, it looks so easy but it needs a very good knowledge of what is going on inside. > > The people who are most able to help you are the XFCE guys (mousepad > being part of the xfce desktop). Is this issue FreeBSD specific? If > not you should definitely report this to the upstream developers. > We are a FreeBSD-only shop. > I'll make a pair of tests in virtual machines to see what happens. > > Can you confirm simple steps to reproduce as follows: > > - Open 2 mousepad windows and open documents in them No, you have to open only one document in one windows. On a machine with only 4GB or RAM, it happens around 10 windows with 10 documents. The documents are small. Not more than 4KB, plain text, no > - do some work in one or both Do nothing but continue to open new windows and then open a single document in them. I change also workspace between. > - wait, the leak happens in idle windows It just happens when the next window is opened. The text never appears and the text in most other windows disappears. The windows with text still visible in them are fully usable. I did not notice any limitations in them. When I tried the same thing on a machine with 8GB RAM, nothing happened. It might will happen too when much more windows are opened. Most important, on the machine with only 4GB, I can reproduce it 100%. Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 15:29:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE7FECF416 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8B3700A0 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6B07FECF415; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E3EECF414 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD5D7009F for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zPdlw2BsnzZqm; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:29:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:references:from:from:subject:subject:received :received; s=mail; t=1516548577; x=1518362978; bh=NCiwhoaM4KIO0K A0JG/SKFXKM8Kei+CuiBJBJZu4ROY=; b=h5nMvDY+MMiLe34rL6alcXMpIU/5Kw kZE1hNnGVWk8x+TsjK0iM9JZqiroI6UUKUj2cqWBJnf/CeAlV60S96ppUKdGftaX N04H8Ud5DHHC+xZGsGF0HWWeiokvKZk3wrrGs9EjdooIg9E4IcEP81OXZtyHN/Dg Da0SWTQrO2iXw= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKYSOLiFp-_C; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:29:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:29:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: mousepad memory leak From: Guido Falsi To: Erich Dollansky Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" References: <20180119140623.3a8116cc.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:29:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:29:51 -0000 On 01/21/2018 16:03, Guido Falsi wrote: > But don't describe this as a memory leak, because it does not look like > that. Closing the opened windows, while being slow, did actually release > the used memory. > I was a little hasty in writing this. It's actually keeping that memory after closing the windows, so it could be a leak...but there's also something else "pathological" about it allocating exponentially more memory for every window. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 15:04:08 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F43ECE664 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D926F658 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 238EAECE65F; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EAEECE65E for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0656F652 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zPdBB12ZpzZqm; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:04:02 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:from:from:references:subject:subject:received :received; s=mail; t=1516547029; x=1518361430; bh=gHVL3oML7oLxPh u4xYn43PkFEXOMNX5/rw3uHIeFTdQ=; b=M/tMQnJ8oMncxyEkgNyeH7u7v1iVKG RUMdOzUnqxg8hq3FXOH/HjqqPINXt8e8YpIcTGjNtfzLv6iHys2lGeLDV8C6aUk7 1Vel+9aHDpTkA+K3NC7SCNIwsqt/6akYl+CDl4Kp0+vUG6+lLKGo/WNMf+AY7YmW ZkyUXnjv94Vsw= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZqUlWbxcLXPm; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:03:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:03:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: mousepad memory leak To: Erich Dollansky Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" References: <20180119140623.3a8116cc.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:03:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:08 -0000 On 01/21/2018 01:44, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> >> The people who are most able to help you are the XFCE guys (mousepad >> being part of the xfce desktop). Is this issue FreeBSD specific? If >> not you should definitely report this to the upstream developers. >> > We are a FreeBSD-only shop. Great for you and FreeBSD, but understanding if the problem is FreeBSD specific or not helps in the diagnosis. Setting up quick jail with some linux distribution is really a fast thing. > >> I'll make a pair of tests in virtual machines to see what happens. >> >> Can you confirm simple steps to reproduce as follows: >> >> - Open 2 mousepad windows and open documents in them > > No, you have to open only one document in one windows. On a machine > with only 4GB or RAM, it happens around 10 windows with 10 documents. > The documents are small. Not more than 4KB, plain text, no I did a test in two jails, one with FreeBSD and one with arch linux. I got the same behavior, so it's not FreeBSD specific. It's not a memory leak though. It looks more like some limitation in thee mousepad architecture. What I did is open mousepad from the xfce menu, open a small text file in it (some random file from /etc), then choose "new window" from the menu, open a file in the new window, and so on. Up to 8 windows it's working as usual, after that it gets slower and slower, allocation a lot of ram for every operation. It looks like the allocated memory grows exponentially, after 10-12 windows it allocates really a lot of memory, this could explaain the behaviour you're seeing. Since it's doing the same in linux it looks like a bug in the upstream software so you should report it there: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/ I also found a bug which looks somewhat similar: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13978 But don't describe this as a memory leak, because it does not look like that. Closing the opened windows, while being slow, did actually release the used memory. I also noticed that when mousepad was working and allocating memory also the "dconf-service" process consuming a lot of CPU. I think it's the communication with this demon which actually has some problems. Just to know why do you need so many windows, when tabs are available? Since it looks like a fundamental bug in mousepad cannot you use some other editor? -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 16:01:29 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B14AED017E for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A0B070FDE for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0LG1UBg085696 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:01:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0LG1UNP085695; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:01:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:01:30 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: Steve Kargl Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' Message-ID: <20180121160130.GA85652@www.zefox.net> References: <20180120222638.GA82875@www.zefox.net> <20180120230421.GA57305@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180120230421.GA57305@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:01:29 -0000 On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 03:04:21PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:26:38PM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' > > > > > > > > man fpsetmask > > Add "#include " to your code. > Sorry, I chopped off the preamble 8-( This is in reference to /usr/ports/graphics/inkscape. Inkscape has lots of dependencies, so knowing where to make a change is difficult. With luck it'll be a config option. I've put the make log at http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/inkscape/ Thanks for reading, and any ideas! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 18:12:15 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50495ED4CCA for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:12:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D5D7581E for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:12:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0LICEhW073903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:12:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0LICEr7073902; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:12:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:12:14 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: bob prohaska Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' Message-ID: <20180121181214.GA73826@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20180120222638.GA82875@www.zefox.net> <20180120230421.GA57305@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121160130.GA85652@www.zefox.net> <20180121173553.GA73646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121175840.GA85758@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180121175840.GA85758@www.zefox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:12:15 -0000 On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 09:58:40AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > Main.cpp contains a test: > > #ifdef HAVE_IEEEFP_H > #include > #endif > > and, in /usr/ports/graphics/inkscape/work/inkscape-0.92.2/include/config.h is > found > > /* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */ > #define HAVE_IEEEFP_H 1 > > so it looks as if the test is satisfied. > > A brute-force search of the filesystem discloses several copies of ieeefh.h: > /tmp/mountpoint.Jw2teE/www/firefox-esr/work/firefox-52.5.2esr/obj-armv7-unknown-freebsd12.0/config/system_wrappers/ieeefp.h > /usr/include/machine/ieeefp.h > /usr/include/ieeefp.h Does this include fpgetmask and does the compiler include -I/usr/include in its command line? Is config.h included in main.cpp? > Thanks for reading, and any further thoughts! What happens if you force inclusion by deleting #ifdef HAVE_IEEEFP_H? -- Steve 20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 17:58:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0036CED44B7 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF5A7511E for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0LHweAk086011 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:58:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0LHwerb086010; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:58:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:58:40 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: Steve Kargl Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' Message-ID: <20180121175840.GA85758@www.zefox.net> References: <20180120222638.GA82875@www.zefox.net> <20180120230421.GA57305@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121160130.GA85652@www.zefox.net> <20180121173553.GA73646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180121173553.GA73646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:58:44 -0000 On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 09:35:53AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 08:01:30AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 03:04:21PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:26:38PM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > > > > > use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > man fpsetmask > > > > > > Add "#include " to your code. > > > > > > > Sorry, I chopped off the preamble 8-( > > > > This is in reference to /usr/ports/graphics/inkscape. > > > > Inkscape has lots of dependencies, so knowing where to make a > > change is difficult. With luck it'll be a config option. > > > > I've put the make log at > > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/inkscape/ > > > > Thanks for reading, and any ideas! > > > > It looks like that you'll need to read main.cpp to see if ieeefp.h > is properly included in the file. Are there any #ifdef HAVE_IEEE > #endif blocks preventing ieeefp.h from being found. > Main.cpp contains a test: #ifdef HAVE_IEEEFP_H #include #endif and, in /usr/ports/graphics/inkscape/work/inkscape-0.92.2/include/config.h is found /* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */ #define HAVE_IEEEFP_H 1 so it looks as if the test is satisfied. A brute-force search of the filesystem discloses several copies of ieeefh.h: /tmp/mountpoint.Jw2teE/www/firefox-esr/work/firefox-52.5.2esr/obj-armv7-unknown-freebsd12.0/config/system_wrappers/ieeefp.h /usr/include/machine/ieeefp.h /usr/include/ieeefp.h /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/usr/include/machine/ieeefp.h /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/usr/include/ieeefp.h /usr/obj/arm.armv7/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/machine/ieeefp.h /usr/obj/arm.armv7/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/arm/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/amd64/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/arm64/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/mips/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/i386/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/powerpc/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/sparc64/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/riscv/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/include/ieeefp.h ^C It's clear the file is present. All the other include files seem to be found, so it's not an obvious search path defect. Thanks for reading, and any further thoughts! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 17:35:54 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8295DED3132 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63420742A8 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0LHZrHl073698 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:35:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0LHZrUQ073697; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:35:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:35:53 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: bob prohaska Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' Message-ID: <20180121173553.GA73646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20180120222638.GA82875@www.zefox.net> <20180120230421.GA57305@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121160130.GA85652@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180121160130.GA85652@www.zefox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:35:54 -0000 On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 08:01:30AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 03:04:21PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:26:38PM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > > > use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' > > > > > > > > > > > > > man fpsetmask > > > > Add "#include " to your code. > > > > Sorry, I chopped off the preamble 8-( > > This is in reference to /usr/ports/graphics/inkscape. > > Inkscape has lots of dependencies, so knowing where to make a > change is difficult. With luck it'll be a config option. > > I've put the make log at > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/inkscape/ > > Thanks for reading, and any ideas! > It looks like that you'll need to read main.cpp to see if ieeefp.h is properly included in the file. Are there any #ifdef HAVE_IEEE #endif blocks preventing ieeefp.h from being found. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 21 23:58:04 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B453AEC2A38 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88865822D8 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E20514FA4; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:58:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE2E37C69; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:58:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D441837C68; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:58:00 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:54 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20180122.085554.873817463644593291.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Bug report commit request From: Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:58:04 -0000 Dear committers, Would someone please commit following bug reports? Bug 224507 - New port: devel/liblockfile standard lockfile library https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224507 Bug 224508 - New port: sysutils/lockfile-progs programs for locking and unlocking files and mailboxes https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224508 Bug 224511 - security/logcheck: change RUN_DEPENDS https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224511 Best Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 03:07:30 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D34ECA469 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC7163C14 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DF152ECA468; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAE8ECA467 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from out1-8.antispamcloud.com (out1-8.antispamcloud.com [185.201.16.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D79F63C13 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from [153.92.8.106] (helo=srv31.niagahoster.com) by mx3.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1edSS6-0006Gm-Hc; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 04:07:19 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sumeritec.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BXxRzJ7R24RRAIxuOxmMtnrembY8owq6KT8DGWw3fFM=; b=O9GQl06Q29Fu8w76IVC0dCWcNc YwH/KQ0cb+Qp21atdF0koREj6ugwunVsmBWbxNTrUoypI0pt9cCENBYxiu0JMcIDaoMwEaPxQt+bK bcKDtlOgEUhOQA7oaRA2tF2okqgSoGZLRjCmCCiFBmeB5KQqyidr3zfnVPU8tb/MKb47Ja4VMYnuK w5wa4dyGEx1V42WCWeUpXFEz33UxBFf6CkGkKAoqwOpi5lXgt6eaeiYPeI5hqkzpfjkrqJOvkVNDO V3kFIaAUBeZp1wprX086cp1EKN++8EE22WqjUCHHXv12mgA4bHXpJg81voGnPwnfuImAWfkT/Pox3 HOqB6VNw==; Received: from [114.125.85.205] (port=54936 helo=X220.sumeritec.com) by srv31.niagahoster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1edSRM-0006ML-42; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:06:32 +0700 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:06:28 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Guido Falsi Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: mousepad memory leak Message-ID: <20180122110628.14b6113a.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> In-Reply-To: <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> References: <20180119140623.3a8116cc.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AuthUser: freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com X-Originating-IP: 153.92.8.106 X-AntiSpamCloud-Domain: out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Username: niaga Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=niaga@out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.28) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5kLOmgSB1asy1Pb6axk8Kqnj1g3/PwYZaTCzSym8uE9HiNVGCNU+fAAW XYvOOni4z2Z4K2erRjaI0grJlTBLLin25PMVREC+AgXcWn2fWbotvdSIBEIweh8dwLyJskhinATJ sjWw5+0eZIpQIcK9yrTOdWG4cwy4eb7cCNwhEPxIZhl+JJlzne8ks3laM5rckTSkkFlQZz6yFr2K mBj9WjaK54YNgBMK/cTYPsBEoX179aHqbsOLz4EkKfELCxwJIuCuRipgeuVjmv1s/D+SPSrFkCxZ 25wl+SuGnaEIRu161qkK742y4wCes8FTZAV12ergYn5m3En5x4j//rD91bnnmN4L8ezDKlqK/N/N d2ThKjVMiaBuTf+Rjw1QjE94ZiObofOmVZ8jq2JCzFshGkbfX8TdqEXkwxwMjsp2mNApnwGVkQwq AMipP72tJ58ntiERbInMiTBIUBbQ/Dy6Ip4lprBQcgaFwLgmRMoOfSzPNQmjrtscA0MQ7FIEryvp yCNSEa7lGCzoFJ8qE7uZVV9TClaa5UGMDfih85xEDRT9kH43y5qCb0fEo8SA89/hh2VmkvTsXI5d Vln3/GGsI6fMyO5aHMxIaKOGYE+AoaD1ibTO4blsYS0cHh5DI9v9LGqvaWzftNL60FI+/Ly8RqdD bFosV7q/YY6M+t085tvs9nQX+Dr8mNhIlIO8AACI+Vz1pRXWhjh9fdbl44I0Df3sqEGASfNaq/P5 RvYeKXcvB/5gPIBlsVUY92AdgtSi9NYKT/ZoPc8o9qfRmrzAUB02AD9u+nF6eKoEMp0v7owZpsib JQz6bCR19sO/++nnSqCDBedeB75TJ0VuxRY+unEnaeycva4NRXu2m3j3Y8zB9xGo0bndvIE+SDBs cm+vLsJwCTsIHmCarFKjfmeYeNGLLI6rY1d8Qdsix0hWyXbo X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.antispamcloud.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:07:30 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:03:49 +0100 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 01/21/2018 01:44, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.xfce.org/ here we are: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14184 Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 13:52:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E15EC2203 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8727CE0C for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6CDF1EC2202; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C675EC2201 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from mx36-out25.antispamcloud.com (mx36-out25.antispamcloud.com [209.126.121.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCED7CE08 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from [153.92.8.106] (helo=srv31.niagahoster.com) by mx3.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1edWeP-0005dU-2C; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:36:18 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sumeritec.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QG2IAxhFxpsl8HCggT5YCtNX0HiwDQMKVqJGpKvoBYA=; b=i8EljJigYs3y4olTdxfX1ZfVpp NDcy2oU3WZJK1CvmDeLl91LqKJdLIP6NKisHYMoHNFjuE/T02V0vT3V8Bze5cBlPrmh/sxRtsdbC+ W31YrUDWX99gHbfMlN4Q8MjFRS17PHdWyLzExOcY22vj0TUhOZrB3TSjF1cGKdPn07qbnOENKexzr O5SomMKH/d+4rM1p7+prfSGQ3weGw78qfDzx3v5/zCCCcnT4cuCDFQ+Q3RxnKaImRQqQysbQFLyzf 3SLVIQGf/iB2sF8BP8KeaQywZDYT07R1OOvwNwrzoLXYBm5e1IQEbFvGJrflFZgmleivufeUHJaWf MDDN47Zw==; Received: from [114.125.69.161] (port=21389 helo=X220.sumeritec.com) by srv31.niagahoster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1edWeK-0008IB-P6; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:36:12 +0700 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:36:10 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Guido Falsi Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: mousepad memory leak Message-ID: <20180122153610.5959029f.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> In-Reply-To: <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> References: <20180119140623.3a8116cc.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AuthUser: freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com X-Originating-IP: 153.92.8.106 X-AntiSpamCloud-Domain: out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Username: niaga Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=niaga@out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.35) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5lmKXOqotsBLV+Tbx+Vl//Hj1g3/PwYZaTCzSym8uE9HiNVGCNU+fAAW XYvOOni4z2Z4K2erRjaI0grJlTBLLin25PMVREC+AgXcWn2fWbotMyIC8r1bxAR+mWMKswAV5ATJ sjWw5+0eZIpQIcK9yrTOdWG4cwy4eb7cCNwhEPxIZhl+JJlzne8ks3laM5rckTSkkFlQZz6yFr2K mBj9WjaK54YNgBMK/cTYPsBEoX179aHqbsOLz4EkKfELCxwJIuCuRipgeuVjmv1s/D+SPSrFkCxZ 25wl+SuGnaEIRu161qkK742y4wCes8FTZAV12ergYn5m3En5x4j//rD91bnnmN4L8ezDKlqK/N/N d2ThKjVMiaBuTf+Rjw1QjE94ZiObofOmVZ8jq2JCzFshGkbfX8TdqEXkwxwMjsp2mNApnwGVkQwq AMipP72tJ58ntiERbInMiTBIUBbQ/Dy6Ip4lprBQcgaFwLgmRMoOfSzPNQmjrtscA0MQ7FIEryvp yCNSEa7lGCzoFJ8qE7uZVV9TClaa5UGMDfih85xEDRT9RivFQk+ZcDnJVpPeL8YOygAqrQ5Xb613 DPMRH8YW4V/MyO5aHMxIaKOGYE+AoaD1ibTO4blsYS0cHh5DI9v9LGqvaWzftNL60FI+/Ly8RqdD bFosV7q/YY6M+t085tvsuQOZqXPEl0sK9RFPWgE5Dlz1pRXWhjh9fdbl44I0Df3sqEGASfNaq/P5 RvYeKXcvB/5gPIBlsVUY92AdgtSi9NYKT/ZoPc8o9qfRmrzAUB02AD9u+nF6eKoEMp0v7owZpsib JQz6bCR19sO/++nnSqCDBedeB75TJ0VuxRY+unEnaeycva4NRXu2m3j3Y8zB9xGo0bndvIE+SDBs cm+vLsJwCTsIHmCarFKjfmeYeNGLLI6rY1d8Qdsix0hWyXbo X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.antispamcloud.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:52:13 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:03:49 +0100 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 01/21/2018 01:44, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Setting up quick jail with some linux distribution is really a fast > thing. not really when you are a 'bit' remote. The knowledge about Linux is very limited too. I do larger downloads only when I am back to civilisation. > I also noticed that when mousepad was working and allocating memory > also the "dconf-service" process consuming a lot of CPU. I think it's > the communication with this demon which actually has some problems. > Yes, it might be the combination of them causing the problem. > Just to know why do you need so many windows, when tabs are available? I open one drawing together with its textual description on one desktop. It is just the workflow. > Since it looks like a fundamental bug in mousepad cannot you use some > other editor? Irony is that I used mousepad the first time for this thinking that it is small, the machine is limited, should still work. Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 16:48:47 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D92EC9D46 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E152841AE for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0MGmnML089397 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:48:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0MGmmYo089396; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:48:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:48:48 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: Steve Kargl Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' Message-ID: <20180122164848.GA89314@www.zefox.net> References: <20180120222638.GA82875@www.zefox.net> <20180120230421.GA57305@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121160130.GA85652@www.zefox.net> <20180121173553.GA73646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121175840.GA85758@www.zefox.net> <20180121181214.GA73826@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180121181214.GA73826@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:48:47 -0000 On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 10:12:14AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 09:58:40AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > Main.cpp contains a test: > > > > #ifdef HAVE_IEEEFP_H > > #include > > #endif > > > > and, in /usr/ports/graphics/inkscape/work/inkscape-0.92.2/include/config.h is > > found > > > > /* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */ > > #define HAVE_IEEEFP_H 1 > > > > so it looks as if the test is satisfied. > > > > A brute-force search of the filesystem discloses several copies of ieeefh.h: > > /tmp/mountpoint.Jw2teE/www/firefox-esr/work/firefox-52.5.2esr/obj-armv7-unknown-freebsd12.0/config/system_wrappers/ieeefp.h > > /usr/include/machine/ieeefp.h > > /usr/include/ieeefp.h > > Does this include fpgetmask Running grep -i fpgetmask on both files discloses no matching lines. > and does the compiler include -I/usr/include > in its command line? I can't find that exact string in the log file, but lots of other include files do seem to be found. Might it be incuded implicitly, from elsewhere? > Is config.h included in main.cpp? > > Seemingly yes. > What happens if you force inclusion by deleting #ifdef HAVE_IEEEFP_H? > After commenting out the test, running make clean and restarting a single- threaded make the process stops with the same error: src/main.cpp:679:15: error: use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' fpsetmask(fpgetmask() & ~(FP_X_DZ | FP_X_INV)); I've placed a copy of the make log file at http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/inkscape/ieeefp_h_included.log Thanks for reading! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 18:14:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD86ECD953 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989E036AE for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0MIEQ5V081312 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:14:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0MIEQUF081311; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:14:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:14:26 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: bob prohaska Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' Message-ID: <20180122181426.GA81243@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20180120222638.GA82875@www.zefox.net> <20180120230421.GA57305@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121160130.GA85652@www.zefox.net> <20180121173553.GA73646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180121175840.GA85758@www.zefox.net> <20180121181214.GA73826@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20180122164848.GA89314@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180122164848.GA89314@www.zefox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:14:32 -0000 On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:48:48AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > What happens if you force inclusion by deleting #ifdef HAVE_IEEEFP_H? > > > After commenting out the test, running make clean and restarting a single- > threaded make the process stops with the same error: > > src/main.cpp:679:15: error: use of undeclared identifier 'fpgetmask' > fpsetmask(fpgetmask() & ~(FP_X_DZ | FP_X_INV)); > > > I've placed a copy of the make log file at > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/inkscape/ieeefp_h_included.log > rpi2 is an ARM based board, right? Compare /usr/src/sys/amd64/include/ieeefp.h /usr/src/sys/arm/include/ieeefp.h It seems that FreeBSD' ARM architecture doesn't implement the functions associate with ieeefp.h. You probably need to force HAVE_IEEEF_H to 0. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 18:38:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DA1ECEA67 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A5A63921 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 60FF9ECEA66; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6097AECEA65 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d7::103:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C24E63920 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from [172.16.20.147] (unknown [46.183.103.17]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9298F16DA71 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:38:35 +0100 (CET) From: Franco Fichtner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Subject: Re: RESTRICTED in net/frr Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:38:33 +0100 References: <20180112085721.GS2827@home.opsec.eu> <5F8656B5-29D7-44E2-A822-3251F6B86907@lastsummer.de> <20180112112143.GT2827@home.opsec.eu> To: FreeBSD Ports In-Reply-To: <20180112112143.GT2827@home.opsec.eu> Message-Id: <97DDD0D4-69E4-4401-9F81-163EC30B56D8@lastsummer.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:46 -0000 Hi all, No response from the committer or portmgr. This is *bad*. So we all agree it's ok to use the FreeBSD ports tree to block open source projects for petty fights and favours? But we are offended by strong language? Can somebody with authority please clear this up beyond a reasonable doubt or revert like it should have been over a week ago. Thank you, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 20:18:49 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB47ED3A9A for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6C06CB27 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CBB24ED3A98; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB556ED3A97 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 892F06CB26 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zQN6m2TZpzZrQ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:18:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:from:from:references:subject:subject:received :received; s=mail; t=1516652309; x=1518466710; bh=Qvh1ZvKLg84rok pKqJ4k1raICL9nOXzJxtqYBG4nYk8=; b=UwmvTziANyy3Ci1wF7401gKnthex+s cbvawYaxl3ReXUzGV6a8zhg4ZdVntOLnvEbe/MYBWcHtrSRWVIG+vtrengScNh7a 61jbwoqKhQ/7P5UX6qEAkSGCrGv7pGKuyTeThmmzGm4hbD6NMW550E3HMvkiTPvM ozjZx9ifmm77Y= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q3KQh8wi_YJK; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:18:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:18:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: mousepad memory leak To: Erich Dollansky Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" References: <20180119140623.3a8116cc.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> <20180122153610.5959029f.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <90d8a2ad-172a-1dbc-4781-1ad8f7c15b7a@madpilot.net> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:18:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180122153610.5959029f.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:18:50 -0000 On 01/22/2018 08:36, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Irony is that I used mousepad the first time for this thinking that it > is small, the machine is limited, should still work. > I just committed r459693 which adds commits from the upstream repository as patches which address this issue. I have been unable to cause the pathological behaviour with these patches, so they work, at least to some extent. Please test after upgrading your ports or packages(whatever you use) and report back. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 22:50:39 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF48FEB5065 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 22:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D997B72C55 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 22:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zQRV02tkzzxbCV; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:50:32 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at covisp.net Received: from mail.covisp.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSa7QCZeDVGf; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:50:28 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Subject: MariaDB 10.0 is vulnerable From: "@lbutlr" Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:50:21 -0700 X-Random-Signature: Apple Broke Applescrip[t access to signatures, random sigs now powered by Keyboard Maestro Pro X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3F28783C-B8A6-42D4-9BB0-1FA089E40567@kreme.com> To: freebsd ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 22:50:40 -0000 I have a new server I am setting up and I am trying to make it identical = to the server I am retiring. Both are running FreeBSD 11.1 Today I updated mariadb100-server to 10.0.33_1 on the original server, = but when I try to do that on the new server I get: =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for mariadb100-server-10.0.33_1 =3D=3D=3D> mariadb100-server-10.0.33_1 has known vulnerabilities: mariadb100-server-10.0.33_1 is vulnerable: MySQL -- multiple vulnerabilities CVE: CVE-2018-2703 CVE: CVE-2018-2696 CVE: CVE-2018-2668 CVE: CVE-2018-2667 CVE: CVE-2018-2665 CVE: CVE-2018-2647 CVE: CVE-2018-2646 CVE: CVE-2018-2645 CVE: CVE-2018-2640 CVE: CVE-2018-2622 CVE: CVE-2018-2612 CVE: CVE-2018-2600 CVE: CVE-2018-2591 CVE: CVE-2018-2590 CVE: CVE-2018-2586 CVE: CVE-2018-2583 CVE: CVE-2018-2576 CVE: CVE-2018-2573 CVE: CVE-2018-2565 CVE: CVE-2018-2562 WWW: = https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/e3445736-fd01-11e7-ac58-b499baebfeaf.htm= l 1 problem(s) in the installed packages found. =3D> Please update your ports tree and try again. =3D> Note: Vulnerable ports are marked as such even if there is no = update available. =3D> If you wish to ignore this vulnerability rebuild with 'make = DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=3Dyes=E2=80=99 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 22 23:12:35 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9A5EB63F2 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 23:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [104.225.5.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "apnoea.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB00E73EAF for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 23:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id eef34139 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:12:24 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Subject: Re: MariaDB 10.0 is vulnerable From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <3F28783C-B8A6-42D4-9BB0-1FA089E40567@kreme.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:12:23 -0700 Cc: freebsd ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <38290E32-C6DC-4C1A-8495-150E78B74E9C@adamw.org> References: <3F28783C-B8A6-42D4-9BB0-1FA089E40567@kreme.com> To: "@lbutlr" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 23:12:36 -0000 > On 22 Jan, 2018, at 15:50, @lbutlr wrote: > > I have a new server I am setting up and I am trying to make it identical > to the server I am retiring. Both are running FreeBSD 11.1 > > Today I updated mariadb100-server to 10.0.33_1 on the original server, > but when I try to do that on the new server I get: > > ===> Cleaning for mariadb100-server-10.0.33_1 > ===> mariadb100-server-10.0.33_1 has known vulnerabilities: > mariadb100-server-10.0.33_1 is vulnerable: > MySQL -- multiple vulnerabilities > CVE: CVE-2018-2703 > CVE: CVE-2018-2696 > CVE: CVE-2018-2668 > CVE: CVE-2018-2667 > CVE: CVE-2018-2665 > CVE: CVE-2018-2647 > CVE: CVE-2018-2646 > CVE: CVE-2018-2645 > CVE: CVE-2018-2640 > CVE: CVE-2018-2622 > CVE: CVE-2018-2612 > CVE: CVE-2018-2600 > CVE: CVE-2018-2591 > CVE: CVE-2018-2590 > CVE: CVE-2018-2586 > CVE: CVE-2018-2583 > CVE: CVE-2018-2576 > CVE: CVE-2018-2573 > CVE: CVE-2018-2565 > CVE: CVE-2018-2562 > WWW: > https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/e3445736-fd01-11e7-ac58-b499baebfeaf.html > > 1 problem(s) in the installed packages found. > => Please update your ports tree and try again. > => Note: Vulnerable ports are marked as such even if there is no update > available. > => If you wish to ignore this vulnerability rebuild with 'make > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes’ What happened here is that there are multiple known vulnerabilities in MariaDB 10.0. Ports with known vulnerabilities are marked as vulnerable, even if there's no update available. You can ignore the vulnerability by rebuilding with 'make DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes". # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 23 02:55:38 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEC5EC73BA for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426017DFBE for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 41B25EC73B8; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4157DEC73B7 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from mx12-out5.antispamcloud.com (mx12-out5.antispamcloud.com [46.165.232.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86687DFBC for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com) Received: from [153.92.8.106] (helo=srv31.niagahoster.com) by mx37.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ednIq-0000tU-O0; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:23:09 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sumeritec.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=op+kMbgwbt8h/brUGxbVZTuPmlWWy4xe2bV9eEsQ+uc=; b=k0nHzm94NMvFT5STABeL3r5aGj yLXS+hTWpVA/cYLvo4Hjp/jPrR762HvXnKZ88CpaOy/fM8rGNxvrDMsv2tyVHVKFc2sIg6CvZBLuT v7ClNHq8Smkw+528syZh+XvwEsrpEiyWPBj8b/sKNfwzyODJBdRcn2IQ1fgLQcmElBbxmMZzTaF2N 7QGZ/4Hdvm5ZutUYCHr8l2h40nklRaXSjJJh4GY5ly/F1A4ZBXrSLBFIlMvYN8Uhrc12m7GgVNXVx rDhp5xzyWtANIGBnhANp7+bw+9s28mR+dEFLE/MpxA9C9h+ijzHdcGHwQlhj6W5lPWKr11bzPmBn/ frC2KutA==; Received: from [114.125.89.7] (port=57316 helo=X220.sumeritec.com) by srv31.niagahoster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ednI4-0003Rt-B7; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:22:20 +0700 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:22:16 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Guido Falsi Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: mousepad memory leak Message-ID: <20180123092216.04e462e8.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> In-Reply-To: <90d8a2ad-172a-1dbc-4781-1ad8f7c15b7a@madpilot.net> References: <20180119140623.3a8116cc.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <5e86f329-5bda-2494-c6e7-01482b685f20@madpilot.net> <20180121084315.7f3696a7.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <7724bcc7-9c4f-c196-6348-c4a4fde0fe97@madpilot.net> <20180122153610.5959029f.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <90d8a2ad-172a-1dbc-4781-1ad8f7c15b7a@madpilot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AuthUser: freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com X-Originating-IP: 153.92.8.106 X-AntiSpamCloud-Domain: out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Username: niaga Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=niaga@out.niagahoster.com X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.37) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5j/6eH5Kdy6oKFaQeaAjjTLj1g3/PwYZaTCzSym8uE9HiNVGCNU+fAAW XYvOOni4z2Z4K2erRjaI0grJlTBLLin25PMVREC+AgXcWn2fWbotkX6+mhSn/zLwX6BDgeYC3wTJ sjWw5+0eZIpQIcK9yrTOdWG4cwy4eb7cCNwhEPxIk05p+wzAw1NgNx4dLcQ7mO76fEouuBW8B+eS 2SL6Wsexkzc3MaPwhyyXNpaCoQ64z42+kaWZdt6N+q59XgE2+qwAv3oSBTgngne2xb/kOTCix59s TWOZYSnnMjQ31wvFVPTxUfTKKOeFu/oqiIZGN/WMvoh5yWxW/0oidQBUpoRtqRw8MJOyW9r5WhMs pLZKl3PI6tvKOZLGjRWekvsXzLnr7jXzNR45DRBcGqXviIDXs2KsRjKrCowEavDwQuKoyIDplqhR 8p+aP+XspBMZVpnckpWaLvahyBjmQxBKOzsnNZ6tILGOfNglqio4kQd7qVveNJS/JAHDeOP4fhCk GFycTHVbK32WHZm7WLiIz05dIkxwNQQLDUZ/xntwxBxYzwY6DTEgTdcmxipXvRGh18I2xtGD/+Y3 SMXx1KpmI3haA2rSRmfxFi2eK/4RTgm5DZcsTd0S7nlAbLmVODWYnWThpgRZnttuLLD01pdfKVIx eJ6Km8OxIDDFiQlYN+dArM4LMRyBzME8qXsxJeY9VjwJWw42swm4bO6gacpMpzKXFfejJbyPbkgK p2Qt4nWKG40e/iuHUYWVVRIuX/vqjwVd1L3bVcC0fTYXKewZy5ZADw8Lk0F6zE7+BzYj4/yp5ft9 Iz0WDtXlRni5HCCJM9Qvlo9UV7vdWttsewtXKowaEO652uo+6xHVEn43gl09DFy5uw80kGdc/ZZw Znv9dmv38yfrvSuATNGuw/hhGp0hPltDTcKNRvi2K+1UJ6NK X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.antispamcloud.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:55:38 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:18:28 +0100 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 01/22/2018 08:36, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > Irony is that I used mousepad the first time for this thinking that > > it is small, the machine is limited, should still work. > > > > I just committed r459693 which adds commits from the upstream > repository as patches which address this issue. I have been unable to > cause the pathological behaviour with these patches, so they work, at > least to some extent. perfect. That was real fast. > > Please test after upgrading your ports or packages(whatever you use) > and report back. > The affected machine a offline for at least 2 more weeks. I will do this the moment the machine goes online again. Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 23 23:15:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD21ECEE56 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loic.blot@unix-experience.fr) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (frostmourne.unix-experience.fr [195.154.28.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0742694A2 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loic.blot@unix-experience.fr) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (unknown [192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BA41C511 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:57:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: scanned by unix-experience.fr Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr ([192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (smtp.unix-experience.fr [192.168.200.21]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpEbZ1XUJkCb for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:57:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from Nerz-PC (LFbn-1-710-40.w86-246.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.246.185.40]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D5721C504 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:57:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=unix-experience.fr; s=uxselect; t=1516748244; bh=3AJFC+Ky9mPowg8FYsWZB7ON5KCMPGp3A7FW32uaQ+8=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=GsEyF1n5WyxTObYfgrOzChA/W3OVma8s1+lbg4sdHJDveIHheYQN9BvSqmHI7mwdz GbB5/i+QszKHUwFSRZnzqZ1LCkbwHnLrs08G6FJcXMvGM3WIpyXSGDsXHveUCj5cYB niQkdf6gB/hOYtE54gRu0L15l993jpLmvcFD39yI= Message-ID: <1516748243.3876.2.camel@unix-experience.fr> Subject: Need reviewer/committer for mattermost From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= BLOT To: freebsd-ports Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:57:23 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:15:09 -0000 Hello, i took some time to package mattermost for freebsd (it's in two parts, but server depend on webapp). Can someone review, comment or push the port ? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225413 All is present (testport, shar, diff, UIDs, GIDs). I have it on my server since 3 weeks within a jail (first in 4.5.0, 4.5.1 and now in 4.6.0) Thanks in advance -- Best regards, Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network engineer http://www.unix-experience.fr From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 24 01:51:42 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC62EDA67B for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:51:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CE67225A for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:51:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 56613EDA674; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4438AEDA66F for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:51:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DFD72257 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h92so3104821lfi.7 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:51:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:subject:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/zr5t3T3ZKlB5ae/aLpNZya8UBZ5nGhIiswe/WY51KE=; b=I4+xrSBtO32txC8hAp79md6pFyn2ycemADWcYznZhrCBe588+eZpsQjhZEygqhpHVe OniPXX8aWNDLLnXqSVYOM9v3J6SUOFFbYopsRux9+BVKXYMeSZldqX2giiBHJKBXyKUx UPDPNk1EQ5cpjJHvhFQoKffgenNR5xz02acANKn/ysc9zZrmVCykAPhSq/Tmg9XGf2nd kQRS4Ta78BVvAs6mt224oYAop4mWEqv4Q+osdST6ZICEscjSDTCRCpDmhwC0vOcZdMDg juxMBu4tIguY3elcJ5vqM3VMN5n7KIr3Lops8PHJ/W7pGdfYRkNz5JR7f8WGK+9l0mhL 59gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/zr5t3T3ZKlB5ae/aLpNZya8UBZ5nGhIiswe/WY51KE=; b=dWQdSQPFZg8nfa1R38CV+D+aBIsckSfG7xc3E75Opze4oxSqqQX/mwsywVBQl1TuhO bF5njira2YYuc/IaEJ6t5bJCb7EspviFwFv5CsBOpAFhyDDCdzgwntHK6rCOqIXF2fYq AGIiHfDfRwTkRlnNvqmh10Mj6gKRTqKTuNrplwHQcwD9BhHAWPfXRBcpArEq4uJwY9OC th/PWJs0Z9KDLYpHwZFC0b92r3IuX2q5UWF328FMSOuk6oZrkXX42oMP41PrJ/WiEsXc hstpKx1H0e1NmSUFLvw8iDVAYHbMhC/R71y6LjAnBGipQie1SGCJxpdzIBMtmybxjVKh pgNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcqy8Q1G/8M5wttqzDow9YsR9xJnwPeC9hgZ98Qn46Cmd3NRlX4 NJX2sVNUU8QLKHqQzgtzaM5rfA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227zatOD+OERPXPhnNcOTvvjyOzw4N8W8AO4kCTMMvTkTVd0+kexlzF/pKui8drH8LG25aBmjA== X-Received: by 10.25.81.13 with SMTP id f13mr2349960lfb.50.1516758698670; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from alex.super (stone.g-service.ru. [84.22.141.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r82sm3243140ljr.39.2018.01.23.17.51.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:51:37 -0800 (PST) To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: source-highlight-3.1.6_9: error building From: "Alex V. Petrov" Message-ID: <17c9e1fd-c4fb-79f2-a009-40e410fcfe2c@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:51:35 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: ru-RU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:51:42 -0000 settings.cpp:112:11: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('std::__1::ifstream' (aka 'basic_ifstream') and 'int') if (i != 0) { FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #2 r328260M: Mon Jan 22 19:06:28 +07 2018 amd64 compiller is default -- ----- Alex. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 24 11:21:08 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEEDECDE71 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergey.dyatko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51E684391; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergey.dyatko@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id h92so4749455lfi.7; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:21:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XiKr+yRQKj/kdB/fJ+UmsjD97PXmSWbfusf7zqUOejU=; b=GQ/hueqARDCtSWRqc2RxzH4iWbV68/hNKD+vZFHjw5h3AhOj0jHTJeDnPeMuJnZ749 e+5FhS9WeD1WZZBQoc46l9JyGfL7awE+SIadMt/k26cBwhKSQdIUfZkTm5L3aiNFmks1 hRumE5CxBUyXmJwA0MfkcVRdWP7NosRRU9dbsyh2dJgB6A+vZzSaUXWhJDKFXzD7OyyX tZastOIxOh1KXTP4AZ3kMujsPfhtqW6sn58dS7D+m8J72h/+bT42J0VEaDzIX/WcGwY/ /lKGngaxEXIXara5GZGcG0XvUB2mLqSNRAHj9hkPZsq6OdRZkek1UcAcp0cF8bIct78D upXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XiKr+yRQKj/kdB/fJ+UmsjD97PXmSWbfusf7zqUOejU=; b=D8UEPTQjEnhDv2aZ9YDMNspNtuxCB6toNZoGEeIm61BBhYmHmHDRoyom0Fzem9rVk3 n+OaSOWnw7KbZ/peaThKOHqozFdiuLIph46kQLIOZGxH3sNAEj0yGJKoQQ+SuhSzGYjL q9noTJSyZCDbD7sLj8Sg5B4v7w3iNCT/K+0/AkeYDleO4akqMbfIgTjbFiz29EPDgU2U wHgG+7qD+jHVMJdD62cGAdLpGkxf+AYXBWarnO7doOmQtYdDjClAYf3ZEZ2dWRLla/Mr HCywbxCglRqSa/RL/0RoMb9v0uTlzMm/xmd29CCx6YubqAArkj9OKRNKvAAPY8IDnUDM i8fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfCXBGzr9K5HjaQc1GGB5Ku19pJsr0/oqEG6jHbyvRoVXu6/hxO 197iepNfo4Vx9HZDAperhxYgHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2243nE7zyTjb9kHb2rVBHFd1zcMhD1uTUpn2SriB/qx3Oo9GraE8OfwVUm3zCajggr9g1Fjrsg== X-Received: by 10.46.5.15 with SMTP id 15mr3251101ljf.98.1516792866225; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:21:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.minsk.domain ([86.57.155.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h63sm16721ljf.36.2018.01.24.03.21.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:21:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:19:55 +0300 From: "Sergey V. Dyatko" To: joneum@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: www/nginx patch failed Message-ID: <20180124131124.74bcd35f@laptop.minsk.domain> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:21:08 -0000 Hi, Possible, after update 3rd party modules this patch isn't needed anymore files/extra-patch-ngx_http_lua_common.h or should be actualized? [tiger@laptop]:/<2>www/nginx>make showconfig | grep -i lua LUA=on: 3rd party lua module ===> Cleaning for nginx-1.12.2_5,2 laptop# make ===> License BSD2CLAUSE accepted by the user ===> nginx-1.12.2_5,2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by nginx-1.12.2_5,2 for building ===> Extracting for nginx-1.12.2_5,2 => SHA256 Checksum OK for nginx-1.12.2.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for simpl-ngx_devel_kit-v0.3.0_GH0.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for openresty-lua-nginx-module-v0.10.11_GH0.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for openresty-set-misc-nginx-module-cda7e50_GH0.tar.gz. ===> Patching for nginx-1.12.2_5,2 ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/www/nginx/files/extra-patch-ngx_http_lua_common.h -- wbr, Sergey From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 24 17:13:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6224EB642C for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kennedy.greg@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6090B6A48A for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kennedy.greg@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1CFF9EB642B; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D88EB642A for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kennedy.greg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C2586A489 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kennedy.greg@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id b198so5588327iof.6 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:13:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9a15KtM7ddbS5XHHOB5P/uLdBntk/OnUU8tqN7LXorw=; b=FEEtBKDGjrwzNJBYm5IKXNkQD/A4oewTOLQ5YOJU9DiaR8qw7yBnP+QTX+Fl53PT3G 9DHLRslMWoj3b7ToCWwxMPHcEkJtbYHxTtxH6d0APNQkDIvHFwRhzIe7TPyelpgSdpXj T31ZTGVgYyTX2cb+7I+UoMY7ABLhbLcsLfi6t7bLLVSLF1W08V2sVqYqRtpR9muqZC6y UtkS5Nl6aa4L8TcMvwb4O1znOA5ecpaIzCM3+iKQbv06G3UxHYahTEJ95ygzNVm/BgCA to/wBqRD/WfSHB7nyIXbRdAe4Bp9LyJjB9YpftIcJoh+yNEE6VuHsSkAwuLfbMFUtGIJ VegA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9a15KtM7ddbS5XHHOB5P/uLdBntk/OnUU8tqN7LXorw=; b=fjx0BTFCP2QVIKH03wpcDXJjD3/6PtNfB6OdWkFU7FKpyV1ZK4HclcBvFLUgvhCg3h 654BDiW47EJZFJwRlqqXAKL0bnc/w0k15gPIPMoErHw287JPVH3iLVKLEVCwTaiikFQo Bmwc+X6eXMsggtzu/MUjJQHZIyeQuyL9XZwsDGXZ1wM1GhjYR3wlMrdB1PJDvMSHcZ1A /EEog36C+c5lmwAtnvfqO+wwOSKdDmCmOxhgM1SQE8HPfAQ4oe9crf2bjg187XD7Hlw4 Z0AcNCNGxhjnCsofr+LFxwslcL5bkD9zByHiaEvC5PWG5V7p9TWYAoOMwGiY/hXc8rQ9 YpJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfA4/zwr9CzOdInMjmO3X3m9kFZ3Yk5wWWx2cJKRhWuacO2EDkN frl06kwk0Zr/hLiqmzBqJck0EF3MY8f+gCdvaoL79sMG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226MsTRwpOhPVDx5XdrbYWFT+DCvp9dcQqkwVuLM0FOrjxr4j9I3GujqkQu5w5tK66qPwSzyxvyqU6n49+c+FMY= X-Received: by 10.107.3.209 with SMTP id e78mr8725365ioi.96.1516813983538; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:13:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.242.24 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:13:02 -0800 (PST) From: Greg Kennedy Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:13:02 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD Port: gifsicle-1.90 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:13:06 -0000 Two issues with this port. * There is a new version of this upstream, gifsicle 1.91. * The default config for gifsicle is to include X11 (graphics) support. With this option enabled, you get an additional application "/bin/gifview", which simply lets you view a GIF file in X. This also pulls in a number of x11 dependencies. And, because this is the default FreeBSD config, it causes the package to be built dependent on X. libX11: 1.6.5,1 xproto: 7.0.31 libxcb: 1.12_2 libXdmcp: 1.1.2 libXau: 1.0.8_3 libpthread-stubs: 0.4 kbproto: 1.0.7 Most users DO NOT need this feature: gifsicle is primarily intended for use on servers as a means to lossless-optimize GIF images and save bandwidth. End users who need a gif viewer will almost certainly never use gifview provided by gifsicle, and instead simply use a web browser, or other image viewer. I suggest that the port Makefile be modified so that OPTIONS_DEFAULT is empty instead of containing X11. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 24 17:26:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE13EB6DC9 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144746AC93 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C2960EB6DBB; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1082EB6DB8 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4EF6AC91 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1eeOoG-000OJE-WE; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:26:05 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:26:04 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Greg Kennedy Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gifsicle-1.90 Message-ID: <20180124172604.GH58156@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:26:05 -0000 Hi! > Two issues with this port. > > * There is a new version of this upstream, gifsicle 1.91. [...] Which fixes security issues, btw! > * The default config for gifsicle is to include X11 (graphics) support. > With this option enabled, you get an additional application "/bin/gifview", [...] > I suggest that the port Makefile be modified so that OPTIONS_DEFAULT is > empty instead of containing X11. Both: Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 2 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 24 23:40:43 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546AFECCFE7 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Scoobi_doo@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic309-21.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic309-21.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.184.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5CB7DCA3 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Scoobi_doo@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: C3D_cxYVM1mwFdFR5sA9E5d6wKFVKAVxuyIeUirdnNuJQ6NSDRI5tBmdAECr8Vo 1mT7x5NNeiODTNuBiss64c7nkQS_Co1h5rAh3un4g7q1t.Z6UaSRGT0hsyMlDDpMzhhImidBplUi bBZLp3tD_xOCDDKCuuCEkdQa6ddaLzv8yy.L3M0I9StMg8co7GWHmYzUkmra8t99V0Qs9LqRGZH3 hex00bGrc69INdpHv6rz.iUMrBdzbKmihkob33RcxmLYX0n8AU0Ef5j3CVEB326W3vkceLlLrryW A6JDQ_WxbDk.16R8RygyWIOeeCRbffg_ut.lE0p.4vqs98c2sf9CDKG.HBEWrLSwfItMdg9tY0SN .njoUygUSkEZFb2znbDeSgiqxxCP4uWOd_LZOsrtPx_Hln8Eventi1XeiU_KpUY8JdJsmx4rFJ5A giDutvtj_AZjc0xfkDZ3eEcdylq7niOhW27vdRw6GD5AxwEXLSYSy4i1VDouf02vdbnrPtV1NK4B N9Ly9UuTv.Q-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:40:36 +0000 Received: from smtp229.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (EHLO ajenkins-hplaptop.mydomain.local) ([10.218.253.212]) by smtp412.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID 935cac172696daf9c51bd23c6638820b; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Ports with binary bootstrap packages and CURRENT+ino64 To: Dmytro Bilokha , =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-S=c3=a9bastien_P=c3=a9dron?= Cc: openjdk8 Port Maintainer , rust Port Maintainer , FreeBSD Ports References: <4b19d0a5-3910-607f-b7e8-b649bd0d591e@yahoo.com> <277de38c-8a20-b5c0-872f-9140d27160fa@dumbbell.fr> <20180104171558.GA3619@wstan> From: Anthony Jenkins Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:40:30 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180104171558.GA3619@wstan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:40:43 -0000 On 01/04/18 12:15, Dmytro Bilokha wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:31:46PM +0100, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: >> On 03.01.2018 01:06, Anthony Jenkins wrote: >>> I'm having trouble building ports with a new Poudriere rig on a >>> 12.0-CURRENT (git commit 423586ee).  The ports that fail are ones that >>> require a binary bootstrap package (e.g. lang/rust and java/openjdk8).  >>> The executables in these bootstrap packages fail with a segfault as do >>> all executables build with a non-ino64 FreeBSD box. >> >> Like Jan, I'm surprised that it crashes. AFAIK, Rust builds fine in the >> official package building cluster, which is also running FreeBSD >> 12-CURRENT. >> >> I don't know what to suggest at this point, so I'll wait that you >> provide the information requested by Jan. Sorry for the reply delay - apparently I wasn't an actual member of the @ports mailing list, and I've had a bunch of stuff going on. I've been looking into the lang/rust problem, and it looks like the cargo binary is built against a pre-ino64 FreeBSD.  The cargo binary comes from distfiles/rust/2017-10-12/cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz: [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/ports/lang/rust]$ tar tvzf /usr/ports/distfiles/rust/2017-10-12/cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz | grep bin/cargo -rwxr-xr-x  0 2000   2000 14719904 Oct  9 18:21 cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/cargo/bin/cargo This binary is not affected by the patch Jan referred to, AFAICT.  I'm trying my hand at writing a wrapper for cargo that uses LD_PRELOAD to call a hand-rolled pre-ino64 stat() that calls the post-ino64 stat().  I have no idea how/why a 12-CURRENT system can build the lang/rust port - I have two CURRENT systems that fail to build it.  Here's my OSVERSION variable: [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/ports/lang/rust]$ make -v OSVERSION 1200053 This kicks in the patch, but I still have the issue. Anthony >> >> --  >> Jean-Sébastien Pédron >> > > Hi, guys! > > I have the same trouble with building java/openjdk8 with Poudriere: > > configure: Found potential Boot JDK using configure arguments > configure: Potential Boot JDK found at /usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk8 > is incorrect JDK version (Error occurred during initialization of VM); > ignoring > configure: (Your Boot JDK must be version 7 or 8) > configure: error: The path given by --with-boot-jdk does not contain a > valid Boot JDK > configure exiting with result code 1 > ===>  Script "../../configure" failed unexpectedly. > > My version is 11.1-RELEASE-p4, so it is possible that the issue is not > specific for the 12.0-CURRENT. > I have an idea, that openjdk8 build process fails in a Poudriere jail, > because of not mounted fdescfs and procfs. I've tried to mount these > fs in the Poudriere jail, but failed. > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 25 00:37:45 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F1FECFBA4; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.catspoiler.org (mx2.catspoiler.org [IPv6:2607:f740:16::d18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "amnesiac", Issuer "amnesiac" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9537FF6A; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org ([76.212.85.177]) by mx2.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0P0c7LS099889 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:38:08 GMT (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mousie.catspoiler.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0P0bWqa002498 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:37:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:37:26 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: Ports with binary bootstrap packages and CURRENT+ino64 To: Anthony Jenkins cc: Dmytro Bilokha , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= , openjdk8 Port Maintainer , rust Port Maintainer , FreeBSD Ports In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4b19d0a5-3910-607f-b7e8-b649bd0d591e@yahoo.com> <277de38c-8a20-b5c0-872f-9140d27160fa@dumbbell.fr> <20180104171558.GA3619@wstan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-Disposition: INLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:37:45 -0000 On 24 Jan, Anthony Jenkins via freebsd-ports wrote: > On 01/04/18 12:15, Dmytro Bilokha wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:31:46PM +0100, Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron wrot= e: >>> On 03.01.2018 01:06, Anthony Jenkins wrote: >>>> I'm having trouble building ports with a new Poudriere rig on a >>>> 12.0-CURRENT (git commit 423586ee).=A0 The ports that fail are ones th= at >>>> require a binary bootstrap package (e.g. lang/rust and java/openjdk8).= =A0 >>>> The executables in these bootstrap packages fail with a segfault as do >>>> all executables build with a non-ino64 FreeBSD box. >>> >>> Like Jan, I'm surprised that it crashes. AFAIK, Rust builds fine in the >>> official package building cluster, which is also running FreeBSD >>> 12-CURRENT. >>> >>> I don't know what to suggest at this point, so I'll wait that you >>> provide the information requested by Jan. >=20 > Sorry for the reply delay - apparently I wasn't an actual member of the > @ports mailing list, and I've had a bunch of stuff going on. >=20 > I've been looking into the lang/rust problem, and it looks like the > cargo binary is built against a pre-ino64 FreeBSD.=A0 The cargo binary > comes from > distfiles/rust/2017-10-12/cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz: >=20 > [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/ports/lang/rust]$ tar tvzf > /usr/ports/distfiles/rust/2017-10-12/cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.= tar.gz > | grep bin/cargo > -rwxr-xr-x=A0 0 2000=A0=A0 2000 14719904 Oct=A0 9 18:21 > cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/cargo/bin/cargo >=20 > This binary is not affected by the patch Jan referred to, AFAICT.=A0 I'm > trying my hand at writing a wrapper for cargo that uses LD_PRELOAD to > call a hand-rolled pre-ino64 stat() that calls the post-ino64 stat().=A0 = I > have no idea how/why a 12-CURRENT system can build the lang/rust port - > I have two CURRENT systems that fail to build it.=A0 Here's my OSVERSION > variable: >=20 > [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/ports/lang/rust]$ make -v OSVERSION > 1200053 >=20 > This kicks in the patch, but I still have the issue. I haven't seen this problem here. Are you running the GENERIC kernel or a customized kernel? If the latter, does the configuration include the COMPAT_FREEBSD* options? The bootstrap is probably compiled for an older FreeBSD release, and if those options aren't present, then the syscall emulation for the pre-ino64 syscall ABI probably won't be there. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 25 02:29:17 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1936ED6C1A for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092255039.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.255.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT TLS CA 4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A6F84A03; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=KBcrElwbJvzLDMdUWT8fMlUTs1XMorve4F+PDIrOyIo=; b=VtPImaJU9Fgh9zUFYKTmDBMM26rMLfNGbm1AGipAugVYPxFheu4Plkbdo0cxMTerAToKJvMuVh9Dz3Gw0MJBLvaV0NnQ+EB66Xln7sBOuwKKVZ/wn/6j3HbSM/oqypV5As+uLXDr+ugnjvMfsMIO/HqaOI+NBvKnCPaEEp5A/ulVRo0MfIWDvtP+JOZGK5QkmhCJLxJ1HRU48Lbx3uc9dRqRmaXvW9Pr+IabRbZ7S/tYdsEpb+golSuh4W4ZWJ9FyjW2uL0luRVlmsdgXGItDg9Z8Vya++G4ybHYojGAg102bLLUphEPaWxU9uPDPsiUbJCiWnJhk+G1pvrMIwE86g== Received: from SG2APC01FT031.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.58) by SG2APC01HT071.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.251.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.428.23; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:29:12 +0000 Received: from KL1PR0601MB1992.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.152.250.58) by SG2APC01FT031.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.444.13 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:29:12 +0000 Received: from KL1PR0601MB1992.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::10b9:916d:fbeb:d5d5]) by KL1PR0601MB1992.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::10b9:916d:fbeb:d5d5%14]) with mapi id 15.20.0428.024; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:29:12 +0000 From: Tatsuki Makino To: Stefan Esser , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: py27 ports always show "new version available" Thread-Topic: py27 ports always show "new version available" Thread-Index: AQHThkVJArlTRtl0HEC/0527uvWkz6NlkcgAgAI3qgOAHCwiRQ== Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:29:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: , <20180105180108.GA26988@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, ja-JP Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:BA4C87FAFDE3EDD31C9315676FB895880D0E6DD8D01093F326206124A8433BFC; UpperCasedChecksum:EFC6371CB5A5E3F4903CC4381CC55441B4A9CB9A8AC5127D940E232F79AA3161; SizeAsReceived:7456; Count:46 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [boR1oNEe02BX5Y6tkT2n9Vy4cPWBrddEjAC6rV1R43/YPM1Hd5U7E2iBPIAWgcFPak6VGy4QYaM=] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SG2APC01HT071; 6:vSBCFJ3rObGDS1s2hXwHNdQeLPHtUJykE49SYSVmcRr8368DsJrxcgXM9jBFPun5Ruyapt0Qyp8+VggEoyx2fShsHcQL9KMOqrgwSYGME+J5cAXo5Br/JdsYCDsFFYkFzUNhVjwL6YJPYRuxiZPuPdLz7H5osSHlSg+ENmsbhyJEph1gCfQhAfp9why95x7Otq1QzZOAUl+TZXVDOtmNqkqQYUHU0Ri6xDmHQcJ0e5a8asFyyRxS9N8III9/hKot3EgemVRTwhGWstcqKeICRzJ3sNhcIq/c3nqZ36gh3QsuzMhUtUIs8DMAXgQi/xV7R6avmIqqC9WlaOKupl3vRRmFcJSIPDkSLI4RBCXCd64=; 5:2idu2RujPvCyyYJiCMuTjhzHRI6E3CxLPy8PbOc7aUXju1SHUdsxCJJykMdDvgnaZ5KrJ1lNjmT1Q2FCyCC09W2u4AjefDawFcY7A2aSbbz6JrfAsIuZUuda3RCm5VsPiJEDJHsVfmivJWBkukkfHy4mGCJ0hMyajydUf8Jl2lA=; 24:dZxFyVlJoz9Kd9bQoHQNNwyOZarG+Pl5cIDRt12DNhlnLjj+JH96bLjPhZMHnsxCENec1dq9ENu1h09oftDh5eUixVV4xu24Eq2EZLIbuag=; 7:P7kPtoosSdctoStlSbWLFIPvmoOL8pA57N+jg3wp+DgPbDnzJ5FjcpJLQ1bPNlcpDDtWgtqiP6DsQuFpSGEqKxNucMPlBQN71MU0bSWHmiK2ezR4G73cduloPo6IoeKHvlW2aBrcuNMl/+QV4wjyBhWeEMc5e+zlPniqEDuiQqN4rsfaIweG+olJrk35QIbnWLEF0UgWYGchaoxL5DS/4VJxtkIBoOb93yDluQBPmD1g5BjRJlqpkgELF91ZV1ET x-incomingheadercount: 46 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:SG2APC01HT071; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SG2APC01HT071: x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 48288822-6dd5-4e2c-14d5-08d5639b6c3a x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:SG2APC01HT071; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SG2APC01HT071; x-forefront-prvs: 0563F2E8B7 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:SG2APC01HT071; H:KL1PR0601MB1992.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 48288822-6dd5-4e2c-14d5-08d5639b6c3a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jan 2018 02:29:12.8994 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT071 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:29:17 -0000 Hello. Probably, after the function validate_flavor was added (3.18_12), the resul= t of portmaster -i cmake changed as follows. =3D=3D=3D>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Re-install cmake-3.10.2 Re-install py27-sphinx-1.4.8_2,1 I think that the change from "Install textproc/py-sphinx" to "Re-install py= 27-sphinx-1.4.8_2,1" means that portmaster correctly recognized py27-sphinx= is installed. And if portmaster avoids re-installing like other depend ports, it will be = perfect. Thank you.= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 25 06:10:33 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F99EC1644 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Scoobi_doo@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic303-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic303-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A576CE8E for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Scoobi_doo@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: w1wdEaAVM1lOR5LVxuEKSii_XFg8VF5NoY3G9OZc3VQGvC2NpW0VAvkBZkcstdi 5ZilwAvH7v2Q31A3vdYEeXQjmAoI.CQXWZf_theG9xHVQiyBpvjBTG2jFgyW97EltO10_KrUUPBq vAyFgr83tvP8UEO5hROXUSxRgQ31Hco8Aa2BdsTlMFFT8RVfejcjdlZj66yvh3X8e0c7Zd7tXaIX V5zv3unU2JuaXfgiFsDUx.a7.AagK3aT.yMgbfKX0ueAXARzWr3J02la_tgIjAHbiwo9dC6Ayd1E SmapGKtoePEvS8P8bYwxAPBmFZmze7iGM76PoYUtuQ5Xn4IyfI0Oc9f.KbSQ02O8R7EobOdg40TM 3rk0.zTGOx4GR.IGqI01BxSxH9vR6QcINaxqBcgn9gvH9udAOU615U6PoQ3r.pr_LRahSIJipHEG lcN.iC2gRXYPFPKaAgfm4FAmoLHkFgIjUVrGcW48GgqmHa5XbmSf1GFcZ2F5DqBD75mlufloLIuX Z32o7KL_5 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic303.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:10:31 +0000 Received: from smtp102.rhel.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (EHLO ajenkins-hplaptop.mydomain.local) ([216.39.57.211]) by smtp404.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID a8f795863d21a4149cea68d2a0d56e37; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 05:40:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Anthony Jenkins Subject: SOLVED (was Re: Ports with binary bootstrap packages and CURRENT+ino64) To: Don Lewis Cc: Dmytro Bilokha , =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-S=c3=a9bastien_P=c3=a9dron?= , openjdk8 Port Maintainer , rust Port Maintainer , FreeBSD Ports References: <4b19d0a5-3910-607f-b7e8-b649bd0d591e@yahoo.com> <277de38c-8a20-b5c0-872f-9140d27160fa@dumbbell.fr> <20180104171558.GA3619@wstan> Message-ID: <601b5242-a8c9-61a5-548c-64f210b39bb0@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:40:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:10:33 -0000 On 01/24/18 19:37, Don Lewis wrote: > On 24 Jan, Anthony Jenkins via freebsd-ports wrote: >> On 01/04/18 12:15, Dmytro Bilokha wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:31:46PM +0100, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: >>>> On 03.01.2018 01:06, Anthony Jenkins wrote: >>>>> I'm having trouble building ports with a new Poudriere rig on a >>>>> 12.0-CURRENT (git commit 423586ee).  The ports that fail are ones that >>>>> require a binary bootstrap package (e.g. lang/rust and java/openjdk8).  >>>>> The executables in these bootstrap packages fail with a segfault as do >>>>> all executables build with a non-ino64 FreeBSD box. >>>> Like Jan, I'm surprised that it crashes. AFAIK, Rust builds fine in the >>>> official package building cluster, which is also running FreeBSD >>>> 12-CURRENT. >>>> >>>> I don't know what to suggest at this point, so I'll wait that you >>>> provide the information requested by Jan. >> Sorry for the reply delay - apparently I wasn't an actual member of the >> @ports mailing list, and I've had a bunch of stuff going on. >> >> I've been looking into the lang/rust problem, and it looks like the >> cargo binary is built against a pre-ino64 FreeBSD.  The cargo binary >> comes from >> distfiles/rust/2017-10-12/cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz: >> >> [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/ports/lang/rust]$ tar tvzf >> /usr/ports/distfiles/rust/2017-10-12/cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz >> | grep bin/cargo >> -rwxr-xr-x  0 2000   2000 14719904 Oct  9 18:21 >> cargo-0.22.0-x86_64-unknown-freebsd/cargo/bin/cargo >> >> This binary is not affected by the patch Jan referred to, AFAICT.  I'm >> trying my hand at writing a wrapper for cargo that uses LD_PRELOAD to >> call a hand-rolled pre-ino64 stat() that calls the post-ino64 stat().  I >> have no idea how/why a 12-CURRENT system can build the lang/rust port - >> I have two CURRENT systems that fail to build it.  Here's my OSVERSION >> variable: >> >> [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop /usr/ports/lang/rust]$ make -v OSVERSION >> 1200053 >> >> This kicks in the patch, but I still have the issue. > I haven't seen this problem here. Are you running the GENERIC kernel or > a customized kernel? If the latter, does the configuration include the > COMPAT_FREEBSD* options? The bootstrap is probably compiled for an older > FreeBSD release, and if those options aren't present, then the syscall > emulation for the pre-ino64 syscall ABI probably won't be there. [ajenkins@ajenkins-hplaptop ~]$ grep COMPAT /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/MYKERNEL options         COMPAT_FREEBSD32        # Compatible with i386 binaries options         COMPAT_FREEBSD4         # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options         COMPAT_FREEBSD5         # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options         COMPAT_FREEBSD6         # Compatible with FreeBSD6 options         COMPAT_FREEBSD7         # Compatible with FreeBSD7 options         COMPAT_FREEBSD9         # Compatible with FreeBSD9 options         COMPAT_FREEBSD10        # Compatible with FreeBSD10 Am I missing a COMPAT_FREEBSD11?  I see it in the GENERIC config.  I'll add that, rebuild the kernel and try again. GRRR.... that was it!  It's building now on my laptop, I'll whip up a new kernel for my poudriere box I put together and see if that fixes this issue. Thanks for the help, sorry for the noise. Anthonuy From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 25 13:59:39 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1537DED9365 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (www.covisp.net [65.121.55.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B658C7D9AA for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: MariaDB 10.0 is vulnerable From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: <38290E32-C6DC-4C1A-8495-150E78B74E9C@adamw.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:52:33 -0700 Cc: freebsd ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <59DA858A-6A9E-4E43-8884-19E7BC82FA92@kreme.com> References: <3F28783C-B8A6-42D4-9BB0-1FA089E40567@kreme.com> <38290E32-C6DC-4C1A-8495-150E78B74E9C@adamw.org> To: Adam Weinberger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:59:39 -0000 On 22 Jan 2018, at 16:12, Adam Weinberger wrote: > What happened here is that there are multiple known vulnerabilities in = MariaDB 10.0. Ports with known vulnerabilities are marked as vulnerable, = even if there's no update available. >=20 > You can ignore the vulnerability by rebuilding with 'make = DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=3Dyes". Thanks, that makes sense, I was mostly confused because the update to = MariaDB was from he previous day. --=20 I do believe Marsellus Wallace, my husband, your boss, told you to take *me* out and do *whatever I wanted*. Now I wanna dance, I wanna win. I want that trophy, so dance good. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 25 19:06:25 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4A6EC6BF9 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 19:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB126C1FC for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 19:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C51E17D60; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:06:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44268E12; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:06:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AE218E11; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:06:15 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:04:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20180126.040456.2159285771207405632.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Building interactive ports with poudriere From: Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 19:06:25 -0000 Hello. Poudriere sets 'BATCH=yes' when it builds ports. But there are some ports that can't be built with batch mode. Then are there any way to build such interactive ports with poudriere or do I have to build other tools (or real environment)? --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 26 11:39:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08144ED1802 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBDF6F6DE for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7ADF3ED17FE; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D98ED17FA for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F07B26F6CE for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4E815F8 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w0QBd0QU037636 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:00 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0QBd0xb037635; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:00 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201801261139.w0QBd0xb037635@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:00 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:02 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/shflags | 1.2.2 | v1.2.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 27 17:20:39 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8551CECC959 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@saltant.com) Received: from twaddle.saltant.net (twaddle.saltant.net [72.78.188.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E4C17117A for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@saltant.com) Received: from dither.saltant.net (dither.saltant.net [IPv6:2001:470:8d6f:1001::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by twaddle.saltant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 807B53E63 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:20:38 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=saltant.com; s=twaddle; t=1517073638; bh=mtuHNxyenK6ihuYV0WyMmHvCvolCB8/mS5dowBEmEt8=; h=From:Subject:To:Date; b=rKp7dppDVE6B5ZtY1ua969+OKGTZP4svlVb+L1OdpBm+4o0Ra9d4iOvogTB80NPQx Q7a8b4EwgLb99tsPFAfbZfmmkaw8WNVQ3NrilrPOHsfFb8h/7WhG1UnLTGF2ZPQIUO /RmF+4vfKRKikcrKAtJ8fLQyHP5yolkOzDB7P0xqmymNMaQUxY0Vs/VuvgeTO13Fi0 bAGyvPTTujLuBUDy9XRXLXSELblRCgvZW70+fpn0R3o4dCbnXYD9eUQJFxA4U/k+Lm 3miJYjKmDzKQF/oZoaJGPlfkDD5mOLYbG6oQPivpOVROi6Gh8xP5BvwZvdVwaZcEfS MC3TrXix2tfbg== From: "John W. O'Brien" Subject: CFT/CFR: Update ELK stack to 5.6.6 (D14003) To: FreeBSD Ports Organization: Saltant Solutions Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:20:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ofmTXUxuvMvmoI2E0m0SwaM9njrpVEJS1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:20:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ofmTXUxuvMvmoI2E0m0SwaM9njrpVEJS1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="tObHogqCaMR0MNJ1mKtluKmjCr0QZDrJ2"; protected-headers="v1" From: "John W. O'Brien" To: FreeBSD Ports Message-ID: Subject: CFT/CFR: Update ELK stack to 5.6.6 (D14003) --tObHogqCaMR0MNJ1mKtluKmjCr0QZDrJ2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good day FreeBSD Ports, I would appreciate review [0] and test of my proposed patch to update the ELK stack ports to the latest version in the 5.x series. The maintainer has not yet responded to my request for review. [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14003 Thank you, --=20 John W. O'Brien OpenPGP keys: 0x33C4D64B895DBF3B 0x474ABD3C1A7B3F70 (expires 2018-03-14) --tObHogqCaMR0MNJ1mKtluKmjCr0QZDrJ2-- --ofmTXUxuvMvmoI2E0m0SwaM9njrpVEJS1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEKpEHkkRoSDiIJkQOWPtK56pP/m4FAlpstOcACgkQWPtK56pP /m4/oQgAuUfLoTTFTgRFco4YG5xNY3JZjS+9n8ve4AVYbPjgYwFkYltHDqZCpybk jBccAH6yFYEcGowdXYyKYr9lzDI4LMazl0ndiWM81QtrwsySGI3A7ZeRVIOpbbdn WQpomr5oF7eyDf/IXDCv8hrx5nKPydISlR7pVu8SEAqTi4Xrxp5A79O5fB92qxqG mVqvLfYJx/oTYgWLZrOv0pz0ZtBeDJ6IbkbXPfIeAPoDN/1HxyX3HCogZyCqKNMm 2rNI30Q232SnpEVjELOwPfFzvkIsYfYkJuYfMCgItMXcEnQMRXXSz03Q6AnwfCtE JFOHC3VjV90/mjs4fWZoPDq3Q4hp/g== =Aqry -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ofmTXUxuvMvmoI2E0m0SwaM9njrpVEJS1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 27 21:05:10 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9698BEC23CF for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 21:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdkaffee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22c.google.com (mail-ua0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE0379BDE; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 21:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdkaffee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id j23so2424646uak.13; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:05:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1Lo/OHmOgqWprj7kbLS4q68kuwNSY8So4+h20ug0yNg=; b=Qyt3KlgfPSvYjkfQKE6hZ0kBN3evWijORb9kxmrb2W5eTXlecYMXxMFL2EIfKGS6zm 29N8DcBnQzK05Z+7KAGbDnzolbgGtkCpEPcWm4aOYt4UWT6CQbSeio5Fg17frFPmnkE3 Obw89PxSu85A0LJea8BM0w+NfM17VQ4eaMiYs5pBCfjISbtaOm7z+y2hdA0z7DmXYgtd BcGcAr8jcK7lOpBtbftn6JsxXtBbDep4eYLhHRTzC/5kQ0tN+dLC6YPmh3PfSXKOOr32 bQiDWhvHC++IyyBHh5BuPQ1a/IqEzGa8RdTY0VONfigXtK5QQ7Eb5yKwdhljmHufmfQo tbjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc; bh=1Lo/OHmOgqWprj7kbLS4q68kuwNSY8So4+h20ug0yNg=; b=GTZV3niG2fmb7ewPA3drPaNVgf6MdWjOgrBcb7PHfHsVk570uePbgS02xcuBvYS2D2 qf821EjnSTaur7dCBnwOiMWYPeUYSKubPesCqHGOCU7TROMvK6D+HTafEs2LOTRlNpdC S/jJEmQy+Z+rZFV3Y+nlVjxhq7sQ0bMmQs57V7eZ94O6LdPRTZDqIK2fw1VlZkx5be3l 54il0F0hIJccDXdXRJRCRI2Wb+WJjuJSYY2cxVvLUYQaQ7O0GDEW7RPRv1RQ8M7Cukn2 zeTplhFtdpJFvh73rpJ2B+HB36FwybnDOWe7XVCgwmnTX0+dgHDdUVpq79BlB/Uca3VU +vTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcCwqOTVOc2ZZO9uPXqEoNqde8uXWgUjtW1BfXXWYT4rNUu5ugl yI/TSD0lszM7xbUETe2wjjGxE1iOdAerV/py7gaXeA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227vM8UIjHozXI5YzYzfq95x78DEkm3Hc9AiwrnDnvnsmHap11Xy8X52QZDUn19qGxWGl+9jJ0VIfa2o2TgyY98= X-Received: by 10.176.83.76 with SMTP id y12mr15721924uay.109.1517087109482; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:05:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bsdkaffee@gmail.com Received: by 10.31.54.212 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:05:08 -0800 (PST) From: "Jason E. Hale" Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:05:08 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DjPj5062-4FVBVsXciL4Qnhy6IY Message-ID: Subject: 'make clean' seemingly broken with FLAVORS To: FreeBSD Ports Cc: FreeBSD Ports Management Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 21:05:10 -0000 Just looking for some insight here as I was working on FLAVOR-ifying a port and have run into a problem with the PHB information and the behavior of 'make clean'. According to PHB 7.2 at the top it recommends: Tip: It can help simplify the logic of the Makefile to also define FLAVOR as: FLAVOR?= ${FLAVORS:[1]} I have found setting this to be problematic when it comes to running 'make clean'. If a non-default flavor has been built, the work directory of the non-default flavor is left behind after running the clean target. I think the expected behavior of the clean target is to clean everything. The reason given for setting FLAVOR?= ${FLAVORS:[1]} in an individual port Makefile is to simplify the logic, i.e. using: .if ${FLAVOR} == x11 instead of: .if ${FLAVOR:U} == x11 However, leaving FLAVOR empty in the port Makefile allows for the simpler logic and allows the clean target to work as expected: FLAVOR?= #empty It seems silly to have to set an empty variable, but without it, the only way I could achieve the desired behavior of 'make clean' was to either keep the :U modifier or put the FLAVOR logic after . -Jason (jhale)