From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Jun 17 17:45:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0361003D05 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 17:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D13B577D62 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 17:45:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5HHTxWW080701 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 17:29:59 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org From: Grzegorz Junka Subject: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 17:29:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB-large X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 17:45:51 -0000 Hello All According to various sources (including posts to freebsd-x11) drm-stable-kmod supports Polaris (RX 4xx/5xx). Does it mean that drm-next-kmod supports RX Vega? According to Wikipedia Radeon RX 580 is GCN 4th gen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_500_series Which is the last generation before Vega, which in Wikipedia is marked as GCN 5th gen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units So there is no other GPU left between them. There is also nothing else beyond Vega, which suggests that the only difference between drm-stable and drm-next is the additional support for the latest GPU - Vega. Or I am missing something? Thanks GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Jun 17 21:00:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741EA1009DD4 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05397EFA8 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9A4201009DCC; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731E21009DC9 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3FB7EF91 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DF919492 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5HL0T7V021981 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5HL0Tcl021971 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201806172100.w5HL0Tcl021971@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for x11@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:29 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:00:32 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- Open | 220444 | x11-servers/xorg-server crashes on attempt to pla Open | 221540 | graphics/mesa-dri: enable Vulkan drivers Open | 223014 | graphics/mesa-dri: enable NEON and AltiVec Open | 228330 | x11/polybar: Fix build against x11/xcb-proto 1.13 Open | 211797 | x11-fonts/xfs: Add CPE information 5 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 06:55:53 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7861019A39 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE43671939 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.20] (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5I6toUb095434 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:55:51 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) X-Authentication-Warning: msa1.earth.yoonka.com: Host crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20] claimed to be [10.70.7.20] Subject: Re: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:55:46 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:55:53 -0000 On 17/06/2018 17:29, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > Hello All > > According to various sources (including posts to freebsd-x11) > drm-stable-kmod supports Polaris (RX 4xx/5xx). Does it mean that > drm-next-kmod supports RX Vega? > > According to Wikipedia Radeon RX 580 is GCN 4th gen: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_500_series > > Which is the last generation before Vega, which in Wikipedia is marked > as GCN 5th gen: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units > > So there is no other GPU left between them. There is also nothing else > beyond Vega, which suggests that the only difference between > drm-stable and drm-next is the additional support for the latest GPU - > Vega. Or I am missing something? Answering my own question, looks like preliminary Radeon RX Vega support landed in Linux 4.12 with full support in 4.14/15. So it seems there is no additional Radeon GPU supported in drm-next-kmod (Linux 4.11) that isn't already supported in drm-stable-kmod (Linux 4.9). The differences seem to be down to improvements in VM drivers and power management. Please let me know if you have other information. Another question, is it possible to estimate work/time before Wayland/drm-kmod on FreeBSD supports Linux 4.12/14/15 or NVidia cards? GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 07:04:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C781019D4A for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x22d.google.com (mail-wr0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC15971CC0 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id h10-v6so15548546wrq.8 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:04:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ygUJ74eP0FRr+FwgUV1brUSYOTn0qzIO/JP32YxoE1U=; b=f6XVyCvmikhJNkV7+MnycGgwYv60X61EDOlcyxnKPTFX2W9gIMkv542wM2cYSKxm9R 7T3LuxJNIvBpKZKldJX/3TPua15Hyeql54wPkGwCiPg0Bn1FM2dYgsk61w5LDBjzqA8P yruhMrGsJ3+NMrEclEN7gCBpHXuMuoJrEjcCxzispsmvxmy33Hg9yrtPqRT9aSRW6VmL 8JxwV0/O4n3dn7p2rBhqz1qDi6x/9bvCblt9124WqiFOqjbVIUWaVV36v/bnk7a7TadK 5bmK2N+zRDNjrB96J8PeLVllWgpS5Ds8RpjRBeWG1O8cndSeWHWk/gU0DsKoGMofVtnh QEEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ygUJ74eP0FRr+FwgUV1brUSYOTn0qzIO/JP32YxoE1U=; b=XNvLzNpnSV0di3mKsnMJba1Sc4FVVnF9jMTGzD+jzSIBzYSUIsxVKXTaBSAfRG7UKr ouX7QvdW1qfMk8fT3bze6DYsqy0b3KpNc4rUQfaeYoWo5agFlg09k6zNiJawPcldTziH UYKMfM5Qo3yTgjnYZfLHYuvpKXndGFsEzHJk5zwrhxSYMlOpW3p/4Ln3NleJgCrcaKcy CUmhEv+IIz1WgAgFMwk7a3THRKaCTcII1kc17Ke9lb7KfTWe3AkK2IYi+FQ2WUtnz6JL ag4eyekzf4iy1068oeXlLh/OAHxZ+1LqpN5rv3CyKQbygjXXPsQbNZ3eUqiuKS8hZL8+ h69w== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1MpYNPi40wtMmD3ze2hBa8ymP0mdSydwHMuncFSxURcARywdeB LD6rRgWqwkXFJJFx3KVRttpjdbDmQeoaf0xVGKZ61A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJnZqNK8jPJvcmCw8RN21j9casH8wZwnBWKnUQj9fKpFAaMf6h98cLODBVtfS3JpMRTqm78No1ntPQOyZkZm3s= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:408f:: with SMTP id o15-v6mr8296545wrp.133.1529305482456; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:04:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Johannes Lundberg Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:04:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: x11-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:04:44 -0000 On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:56 AM Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 17/06/2018 17:29, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > Hello All > > > > According to various sources (including posts to freebsd-x11) > > drm-stable-kmod supports Polaris (RX 4xx/5xx). Does it mean that > > drm-next-kmod supports RX Vega? > > > > According to Wikipedia Radeon RX 580 is GCN 4th gen: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_500_series > > > > Which is the last generation before Vega, which in Wikipedia is marked > > as GCN 5th gen: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units > > > > So there is no other GPU left between them. There is also nothing else > > beyond Vega, which suggests that the only difference between > > drm-stable and drm-next is the additional support for the latest GPU - > > Vega. Or I am missing something? > > Answering my own question, looks like preliminary Radeon RX Vega support > landed in Linux 4.12 with full support in 4.14/15. So it seems there is > no additional Radeon GPU supported in drm-next-kmod (Linux 4.11) that > isn't already supported in drm-stable-kmod (Linux 4.9). The differences > seem to be down to improvements in VM drivers and power management. > Please let me know if you have other information. > > Another question, is it possible to estimate work/time before > Wayland/drm-kmod on FreeBSD supports Linux 4.12/14/15 or NVidia cards? > You can try building the drm-v4.15 branch from source. It should work now with stock kernel (>=1200066). https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm I use it on my AMD Ryzen 3 2200G APU. We're getting ready to release 4.15 as a port, however it's not bug free yet so it will be a -devel port. > GrzegorzJ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 07:20:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D175101A205 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA90A7225A for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.20] (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5I7Jwoe095741 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:19:58 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) X-Authentication-Warning: msa1.earth.yoonka.com: Host crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20] claimed to be [10.70.7.20] Subject: Re: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Johannes Lundberg , x11-list freebsd References: From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:19:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:20:00 -0000 On 18/06/2018 07:04, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:56 AM Grzegorz Junka > wrote: > > On 17/06/2018 17:29, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > Hello All > > > > According to various sources (including posts to freebsd-x11) > > drm-stable-kmod supports Polaris (RX 4xx/5xx). Does it mean that > > drm-next-kmod supports RX Vega? > > > > According to Wikipedia Radeon RX 580 is GCN 4th gen: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_500_series > > > > Which is the last generation before Vega, which in Wikipedia is > marked > > as GCN 5th gen: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units > > > > So there is no other GPU left between them. There is also > nothing else > > beyond Vega, which suggests that the only difference between > > drm-stable and drm-next is the additional support for the latest > GPU - > > Vega. Or I am missing something? > > Answering my own question, looks like preliminary Radeon RX Vega > support > landed in Linux 4.12 with full support in 4.14/15. So it seems > there is > no additional Radeon GPU supported in drm-next-kmod (Linux 4.11) that > isn't already supported in drm-stable-kmod (Linux 4.9). The > differences > seem to be down to improvements in VM drivers and power management. > Please let me know if you have other information. > > Another question, is it possible to estimate work/time before > Wayland/drm-kmod on FreeBSD supports Linux 4.12/14/15 or NVidia cards? > > > You can try building the drm-v4.15 branch from source. It should work > now with stock kernel (>=1200066). > https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm > > I use it on my AMD Ryzen 3 2200G APU. > > We're getting ready to release 4.15 as a port, however it's not bug > free yet so it will be a -devel port. Sounds great! Sorry for a n00bie question. Once support for drm-kmod lands in the 11.2 kernel, will support for newer linuxkpi KMS APIs (i.e. 4.15) also require kernel changes or they will be supported through ports? I don't quite know how the support for linuxkpi drivers is split between the kernel and userland. Thanks GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 07:24:06 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0531101A459 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com (mail-wr0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F09272576 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d8-v6so15627534wro.4 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:24:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qFnH3QKe7zooW6pUrQ9sPQmTYado6AxBbgicA0Gjzz8=; b=aRZ5fyvBA5k6KTvNs2nZYSSk9Yzg46jXv3vN4wD06d54Hgcpgb/EENuuiJIMBxsHDO pAd7rXkdDjWiInNAbSLWw3e0hxQA/s5vXDZMF8iqs9Zvz5/JPpTGr/0axIfs1UC/Z/A+ geoSvFOKJwo1ijo8IaUxTbfmTxynZ8juy0jgrzIFtabasa7MKOzDPO9KVWp2B+hbadQR 2xjtnAxFUJOr4b7gNTw2NUAj2sNFTvtbgd+74R0CjcojTHEj0e8M4ggoIeyxz9DfwHks N1JVF7btndU0E4IrYXJE6eZQ7MwnI1Shj9GzhTLR8d4Te18YqaUmbLkR0Wj+y+EZkgyb 5UJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qFnH3QKe7zooW6pUrQ9sPQmTYado6AxBbgicA0Gjzz8=; b=qb0KJM8nXySbrIaXoy9+7K3QrP0Nj2fuXnKPnIWJ516eRx+dBj3UWIqzwh0QqVBTAC ABDyQjJpd+S2wQ/17Kx+vf+/9+RuaN1LfAs2tHEqxq7+oazVUYyj+ESKSLpdcMxScz7E Jvm6L6NgUKhUfEykBGEHt7q7p9DKn34A8NZQkl6QWSRK4vxsDaR/LfibPRVUMn97R0FS OmuRWoQiGaiPMTE2VFIja7hSp5d9O5Llt1s3s3/yNsG3UL6bg5IZtPzF8H0MsTxtrVyE unv8yFmWqNh0l0Tbgl3BRm6Bx1TS1zjkqGoFOU/Ij5SGE+Ae0FVYJ1PsVItiV4kT06CX 1fQg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0/G3KqDnZ8FWd6El9uy+A9B2vhqIxDGRHUGKuBrh02ZzofpPRF Lyut0EG6C9VYQRXpJxvGtoBQosyXaOVDZ8iW+/E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLzi1UHXL+2sVJmPDzwIaYw1T0iO1gSMaxZEe4G5EHpNO7SFCujUuAzPQBUbJSJCibwdww+gq+5fwEGk4vd9Y4= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fec2:: with SMTP id q2-v6mr9676584wrs.165.1529306645132; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:24:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Johannes Lundberg Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:23:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: x11-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:24:07 -0000 Support for 4.15 wont be in until 11.3-RELEASE but it will be in 11-STABLE soon though. 11.2 supports up to 4.11. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:20 Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 18/06/2018 07:04, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:56 AM Grzegorz Junka wrote: > >> On 17/06/2018 17:29, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> > Hello All >> > >> > According to various sources (including posts to freebsd-x11) >> > drm-stable-kmod supports Polaris (RX 4xx/5xx). Does it mean that >> > drm-next-kmod supports RX Vega? >> > >> > According to Wikipedia Radeon RX 580 is GCN 4th gen: >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_500_series >> > >> > Which is the last generation before Vega, which in Wikipedia is marked >> > as GCN 5th gen: >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units >> > >> > So there is no other GPU left between them. There is also nothing else >> > beyond Vega, which suggests that the only difference between >> > drm-stable and drm-next is the additional support for the latest GPU - >> > Vega. Or I am missing something? >> >> Answering my own question, looks like preliminary Radeon RX Vega support >> landed in Linux 4.12 with full support in 4.14/15. So it seems there is >> no additional Radeon GPU supported in drm-next-kmod (Linux 4.11) that >> isn't already supported in drm-stable-kmod (Linux 4.9). The differences >> seem to be down to improvements in VM drivers and power management. >> Please let me know if you have other information. >> >> Another question, is it possible to estimate work/time before >> Wayland/drm-kmod on FreeBSD supports Linux 4.12/14/15 or NVidia cards? >> > > You can try building the drm-v4.15 branch from source. It should work now > with stock kernel (>=1200066). > https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm > > I use it on my AMD Ryzen 3 2200G APU. > > We're getting ready to release 4.15 as a port, however it's not bug free > yet so it will be a -devel port. > > > Sounds great! Sorry for a n00bie question. Once support for drm-kmod lands > in the 11.2 kernel, will support for newer linuxkpi KMS APIs (i.e. 4.15) > also require kernel changes or they will be supported through ports? I > don't quite know how the support for linuxkpi drivers is split between the > kernel and userland. > > Thanks > GrzegorzJ > From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 07:40:01 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5B0101A950 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A2FC72C25 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.20] (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5I7dwnd095992 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:39:59 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) X-Authentication-Warning: msa1.earth.yoonka.com: Host crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20] claimed to be [10.70.7.20] Subject: Re: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Johannes Lundberg Cc: x11-list freebsd References: From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:39:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:40:01 -0000 Did you mean 12-STABLE? Let me reiterate to check if I've got it right. To support Vega I need to compile kernel >=1200066 from sources + kms-drm from drm-v4.15 branch. If that's correct, will kernel 12x work with 11.1/11.2 userland or I will need to update to FreeBSD 12? Thanks again for help GrzegorzJ On 18/06/2018 07:23, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > Support for 4.15 wont be in until 11.3-RELEASE but it will be in > 11-STABLE soon though. > > 11.2 supports up to 4.11. > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:20 Grzegorz Junka > wrote: > > On 18/06/2018 07:04, Johannes Lundberg wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:56 AM Grzegorz Junka > > wrote: >> >> On 17/06/2018 17:29, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> > Hello All >> > >> > According to various sources (including posts to freebsd-x11) >> > drm-stable-kmod supports Polaris (RX 4xx/5xx). Does it mean >> that >> > drm-next-kmod supports RX Vega? >> > >> > According to Wikipedia Radeon RX 580 is GCN 4th gen: >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_500_series >> > >> > Which is the last generation before Vega, which in >> Wikipedia is marked >> > as GCN 5th gen: >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units >> > >> > So there is no other GPU left between them. There is also >> nothing else >> > beyond Vega, which suggests that the only difference between >> > drm-stable and drm-next is the additional support for the >> latest GPU - >> > Vega. Or I am missing something? >> >> Answering my own question, looks like preliminary Radeon RX >> Vega support >> landed in Linux 4.12 with full support in 4.14/15. So it >> seems there is >> no additional Radeon GPU supported in drm-next-kmod (Linux >> 4.11) that >> isn't already supported in drm-stable-kmod (Linux 4.9). The >> differences >> seem to be down to improvements in VM drivers and power >> management. >> Please let me know if you have other information. >> >> Another question, is it possible to estimate work/time before >> Wayland/drm-kmod on FreeBSD supports Linux 4.12/14/15 or >> NVidia cards? >> >> >> You can try building the drm-v4.15 branch from source. It should >> work now with stock kernel (>=1200066). >> https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm >> >> I use it on my AMD Ryzen 3 2200G APU. >> >> We're getting ready to release 4.15 as a port, however it's not >> bug free yet so it will be a -devel port. > > Sounds great! Sorry for a n00bie question. Once support for > drm-kmod lands in the 11.2 kernel, will support for newer linuxkpi > KMS APIs (i.e. 4.15) also require kernel changes or they will be > supported through ports? I don't quite know how the support for > linuxkpi drivers is split between the kernel and userland. > > Thanks > GrzegorzJ > From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 07:59:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66789101B27B for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BADC873535 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id z6-v6so13959571wma.0; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:59:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KKwuPBjt6k9P30p81R/Yyb+DrQRXxaZg4sCvbud2oK0=; b=PeTFR4N1KcpAhOiBaz6xSDlKXFkEAfPkgSNJssyDkArDeWZUZ0OkAlpHCSeaKjHps1 BLDJ3bl4mgF7/Rn0Pzyc4DIuawmEhAv3bC2l2KtWKYiMGL09wUfFxRy5Kif1xLtOAHII +vUW2exr+OmpWsheyfmEO57RC8AJNtZhizksT9zoriRTdtI1DTYbgvT5Tj7LsYQYA1Cx KvEveLwfojZr4Rvbbx+46q3s4flCuUyAo9zUrT1gJLvNc0oK9w+JxhqyzGH6zKrV/ugA nD5cAtEp1IpXFv7L/bkFXNPtB9JCBulIAuhsffUnU5Dcj9tikWqtpleSUknZeO3Y3oBi JWPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KKwuPBjt6k9P30p81R/Yyb+DrQRXxaZg4sCvbud2oK0=; b=RkKmLJQxNfD+H54/PxoVu+46TVh0Iwgy5Ru9q4iMevO31EFZrS6LJbRgFJCg57E0V0 fZuxUZb05YOhHDHW2rvCC4Qe3Yo8Yd1iXlUk+xyI10vCXY3DiURy/wQhhDDABgEwpvk7 lXedMoNZGCQoCWHMR4uJB4XP1AcKQ259zC8XKxWKgSzvYiEIQ4YnnAC/R3eKv8AVUiZ9 PdJV9wfVMeu0CcysyWJUd2vnblYa7w++U7BCrSUO1un8V9aCrmM7t/Gk71lw/FRlXKA9 ct/kSkalrf9aiUtw++/y2t1+X9jpLgUl61gmKeuFy/LUQLPTHwI6cgnDl4jxk6dSaDxw SqlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1i2PbWL8VL7v19IBcolXteu1v6O9AT7JncQNeuP5Fj1HsYDsuX XumHx4GabLN28hN6dNBMIRj3i1BXEZ+Vr1TWD9Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK/LC818nCUJ5YouPkE4f3CcY3rbDCI3QvIWHGR6om/6XM6C52dU/nr8cgHzBtU0FA3WiQHJdK/K54TGVCdZ3A= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e48a:: with SMTP id b132-v6mr7705584wmh.129.1529308756956; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:59:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Johannes Lundberg Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:59:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: "hps@freebsd.org" , x11-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:59:22 -0000 On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:40 Grzegorz Junka wrote: > Did you mean 12-STABLE? > No, 11-STABLE. 4.15 support will be merged in 11 source tree soon but won= =E2=80=99t make it into a release until 11.3. You can checkout a snapshot of 11-STABLE until then. > > Let me reiterate to check if I've got it right. To support Vega I need to > compile kernel >=3D1200066 from sources + kms-drm from drm-v4.15 branch. = If > that's correct, will kernel 12x work with 11.1/11.2 userland or I will ne= ed > to update to FreeBSD 12? > You=E2=80=99ll need a recent 12-CURRENT world with recent 12-CURRENT kernel= . If you want to stay with 11, check with hps@ (cc:d) when he plan to backport 4.15 support into 11-STABLE. > > Thanks again for help > GrzegorzJ > > > On 18/06/2018 07:23, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > Support for 4.15 wont be in until 11.3-RELEASE but it will be in 11-STABL= E > soon though. > > 11.2 supports up to 4.11. > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:20 Grzegorz Junka wrote: > >> On 18/06/2018 07:04, Johannes Lundberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:56 AM Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> >>> On 17/06/2018 17:29, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>> > Hello All >>> > >>> > According to various sources (including posts to freebsd-x11) >>> > drm-stable-kmod supports Polaris (RX 4xx/5xx). Does it mean that >>> > drm-next-kmod supports RX Vega? >>> > >>> > According to Wikipedia Radeon RX 580 is GCN 4th gen: >>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_500_series >>> > >>> > Which is the last generation before Vega, which in Wikipedia is marke= d >>> > as GCN 5th gen: >>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units >>> > >>> > So there is no other GPU left between them. There is also nothing els= e >>> > beyond Vega, which suggests that the only difference between >>> > drm-stable and drm-next is the additional support for the latest GPU = - >>> > Vega. Or I am missing something? >>> >>> Answering my own question, looks like preliminary Radeon RX Vega suppor= t >>> landed in Linux 4.12 with full support in 4.14/15. So it seems there is >>> no additional Radeon GPU supported in drm-next-kmod (Linux 4.11) that >>> isn't already supported in drm-stable-kmod (Linux 4.9). The differences >>> seem to be down to improvements in VM drivers and power management. >>> Please let me know if you have other information. >>> >>> Another question, is it possible to estimate work/time before >>> Wayland/drm-kmod on FreeBSD supports Linux 4.12/14/15 or NVidia cards? >>> >> >> You can try building the drm-v4.15 branch from source. It should work no= w >> with stock kernel (>=3D1200066). >> https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm >> >> I use it on my AMD Ryzen 3 2200G APU. >> >> We're getting ready to release 4.15 as a port, however it's not bug free >> yet so it will be a -devel port. >> >> >> Sounds great! Sorry for a n00bie question. Once support for drm-kmod >> lands in the 11.2 kernel, will support for newer linuxkpi KMS APIs (i.e. >> 4.15) also require kernel changes or they will be supported through port= s? >> I don't quite know how the support for linuxkpi drivers is split between >> the kernel and userland. >> >> Thanks >> GrzegorzJ >> > > From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 08:11:36 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CB8101B7AB for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD05C73B96 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.128.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7122E2600FF; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:11:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Johannes Lundberg , "freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org" , Grzegorz Junka References: From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <765892ee-8548-0a6a-298c-a16a2ecbde91@selasky.org> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:11:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:11:36 -0000 On 06/18/18 10:00, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Johannes Lundberg > Date: Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:59 > Subject: Re: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? > To: Grzegorz Junka > CC: hps@freebsd.org , x11-list freebsd < > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:40 Grzegorz Junka wrote: > >> Did you mean 12-STABLE? >> > > No, 11-STABLE. 4.15 support will be merged in 11 source tree soon but won’t > make it into a release until 11.3. You can checkout a snapshot of 11-STABLE > until then. I'll try to merge the rest of the patches needed to 11-stable later today. --HPS From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 21:08:41 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD4C102246F for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5DEA736C1 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.20] (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5IL8XlB006968 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:08:33 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) X-Authentication-Warning: msa1.earth.yoonka.com: Host crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20] claimed to be [10.70.7.20] Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Hans Petter Selasky , Johannes Lundberg , "freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org" References: <765892ee-8548-0a6a-298c-a16a2ecbde91@selasky.org> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <64eca8f9-a0fe-ed20-0289-9be19cccd750@gjunka.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:08:28 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <765892ee-8548-0a6a-298c-a16a2ecbde91@selasky.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:08:41 -0000 >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:40 Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> >>> Did you mean 12-STABLE? >>> >> >> No, 11-STABLE. 4.15 support will be merged in 11 source tree soon but >> won’t >> make it into a release until 11.3. You can checkout a snapshot of >> 11-STABLE >> until then. > > I'll try to merge the rest of the patches needed to 11-stable later > today. > That sounds great! Thanks for your work. I guess I would still need to compile and install 11-STABLE userland before trying it? From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 21:11:56 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96883102288D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF3A73A84 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E3C29102288A; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F7B1022889 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66BA373A7F for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F9025FDA for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5ILBsmi076953 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5ILBsKj076947 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229127] x11-toolkits/qt5-gui is missing a dependency on x11/xkeyboard-config Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bsdpr@phoe.frmug.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:11:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229127 Bug ID: 229127 Summary: x11-toolkits/qt5-gui is missing a dependency on x11/xkeyboard-config Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: bsdpr@phoe.frmug.org CC: kde@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org CC: kde@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org After compiling and installing graphics/xpdf4 on a host without desktop environment, the xpdf command produce the following output and does not acc= ept any keyboard input. xkbcommon: ERROR: failed to add default include path /usr/local/share/X11/x= kb Qt: Failed to create XKB context! Use QT_XKB_CONFIG_ROOT environmental variable to provide an additional sear= ch path, add ':' as separator to provide several search paths and/or make sure that XKB configuration data directory contains recent enough contents, to update please see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xkeyboard-config/ . The error message was right as /usr/local/share/X11/xkb was empty. After installing x11/xkeyboard-config xpdf stoped emiting that message and correc= tly accepted keyboard input. xpdf is so far the only command affected. A dependency on x11/xkeyboard-config is obviously missing in x11-toolkits/qt5-gui. The dependency could alternatively be set on the x11/libxkbcommon port. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 21:57:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3172610001B8 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD33875C2D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7CD5610001AC; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1D710001AA for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C2F75C29 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E7E92668D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5ILvJJa060843 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5ILvJ80060842 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229127] x11-toolkits/qt5-gui is missing a dependency on x11/xkeyboard-config Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rakuco@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:57:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229127 --- Comment #1 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- Hmm, I think it makes more sense to make libxkbcommon have a run-time dependency on xkeyboard-config. libxkbcommon's PACKAGING says: - (build optional, runtime) xkeyboard-config. During build, for automatically detecting the value of -Dxkb-config-root instead of guessing (/usr/share/X11/xkb). During runtime, not strictly needed, but most users of the library would need it. while its README.md says: libxkbcommon does not distribute a keymap dataset itself, other than for testing purposes. The most common dataset is xkeyboard-config, which is used by all current distributions for their X11 XKB data. Arch Linux, Fedora, openSUSE and Debian already have this dependency in the= ir packages. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Jun 19 07:10:26 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9054B1001870 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084276F79A for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v16-v6so18036006wmh.5 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:10:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UvZTyXRHslJnWnE9OtIucbt7gAfiGn1MufmFlgzZeQA=; b=kgMRRpafcTOmwtsbTEF852M0+b16RKIc7/Armb/kilUEFQeF0fyPqxBx2UB5qDd5ja 29UINlMrVtG0f6ztB6xkRatU2T2XNAvB3rrK7pBqtYK7MOv5xGZvv0OSUNpMNEC/hzwl KYoikOc2/Ra72P08krR4LvYJaCQXVU73IvEHws8mS18JiQu4UhuMZAlWUqDn7gginP/J dPFpHzm9Ku6Wv/TJq/j4bl/Dcja7KoSf4LTcPcVZncEPK/BdevSE3KNHKpX6+CDSKRsZ NrRVtg19Ijx1jAkDi7o8zL7bqYp1N/RWWovevwdd6k2Id9M0dJr3yefSPFu8nMLzhWd+ sFfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UvZTyXRHslJnWnE9OtIucbt7gAfiGn1MufmFlgzZeQA=; b=pxMyayCTR6ikIAF33gMTp/i8JaPRqh/CYZ214o4VGVPJwHm2z7F3aKIO0+K4BpN/0u VTUoMV7ypuD/UH9yPECAFlT1iBMHlk1OPzI+5l1wiYMgnPcAElQayStX4aG3lpNaVSLh W48UlvzXGIGVgl1Cnlz6JyDrs17fOibsXAccreO+tqrg9XLnkMhiBP9N+XhaU6gBTskd Ap2uF+hpbsvv073FenzVFzdXoRSBJAM59hscxQiuvMuEO7c5nXTzXwHrMHJaVAFD3tHi cZPL9BAqX08hpFlRb7KznaEic5IJ13xJOmHFjY+YCjTs5JLSWBpKb5jCPhXRSoWlxFfN +obA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0a4NH/Tl803BlAVbYnILR9M+jF9eMeoH0WevgH8FbSEQ32/kBx 4LmRZynPi8Tg/3tkMX9DmtDnodlVva4BkOFi3bs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJrbUyMlLHRjTOfxFI9RlBiOe08ZfXhQE+HKzMdjKxG3OaThJs+7bPgBTXRZR7IWqqdw9ESwq8z0XuT8mdiPuQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:ed0d:: with SMTP id l13-v6mr11271060wmh.73.1529392224770; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:10:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <765892ee-8548-0a6a-298c-a16a2ecbde91@selasky.org> <64eca8f9-a0fe-ed20-0289-9be19cccd750@gjunka.com> In-Reply-To: <64eca8f9-a0fe-ed20-0289-9be19cccd750@gjunka.com> From: Johannes Lundberg Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:09:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , x11-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:10:26 -0000 On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:08 PM Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:40 Grzegorz Junka wrote: > >> > >>> Did you mean 12-STABLE? > >>> > >> > >> No, 11-STABLE. 4.15 support will be merged in 11 source tree soon but > >> won=E2=80=99t > >> make it into a release until 11.3. You can checkout a snapshot of > >> 11-STABLE > >> until then. > > > > I'll try to merge the rest of the patches needed to 11-stable later > > today. > > > > That sounds great! Thanks for your work. I guess I would still need to > compile and install 11-STABLE userland before trying it? > I'm not sure but that sounds like a good choice so you don't end up with some weirdness in userland/kernel mismatch. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Jun 19 07:45:01 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF911003AAF for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:45:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A33C70EB8 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:45:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.128.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75F42260452; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Johannes Lundberg , Grzegorz Junka Cc: x11-list freebsd References: <765892ee-8548-0a6a-298c-a16a2ecbde91@selasky.org> <64eca8f9-a0fe-ed20-0289-9be19cccd750@gjunka.com> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:44:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:45:01 -0000 On 06/19/18 09:09, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:08 PM Grzegorz Junka wrote: > >> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:40 Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>>> >>>>> Did you mean 12-STABLE? >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, 11-STABLE. 4.15 support will be merged in 11 source tree soon but >>>> won’t >>>> make it into a release until 11.3. You can checkout a snapshot of >>>> 11-STABLE >>>> until then. >>> >>> I'll try to merge the rest of the patches needed to 11-stable later >>> today. >>> >> >> That sounds great! Thanks for your work. I guess I would still need to >> compile and install 11-STABLE userland before trying it? >> > > I'm not sure but that sounds like a good choice so you don't end up with > some weirdness in userland/kernel mismatch. > Usually only building the kernel is enough. --HPS From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Jun 19 12:10:49 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EF710156BC for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABC57D3EA for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 37E5910156AD; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E6010156AA for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B27B67D3E0 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DC8DF51 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5JCAlgY042059 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:47 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5JCAlTB042053; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:47 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201806191210.w5JCAlTB042053@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:47 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:10:50 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11/libinput | 1.6.0 | 1.11.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Jun 20 21:08:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4DB100C2B2 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F8774D39 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5KL8CPR054078 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:08:12 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Radeon RX Vega 64 supported by drm-next? To: Hans Petter Selasky , Johannes Lundberg Cc: x11-list freebsd References: <765892ee-8548-0a6a-298c-a16a2ecbde91@selasky.org> <64eca8f9-a0fe-ed20-0289-9be19cccd750@gjunka.com> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:08:12 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB-large X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:08:21 -0000 On 19/06/2018 07:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 06/19/18 09:09, Johannes Lundberg wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:08 PM Grzegorz Junka >> wrote: >> >>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:40 Grzegorz Junka >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Did you mean 12-STABLE? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, 11-STABLE. 4.15 support will be merged in 11 source tree soon but >>>>> won’t >>>>> make it into a release until 11.3. You can checkout a snapshot of >>>>> 11-STABLE >>>>> until then. >>>> >>>> I'll try to merge the rest of the patches needed to 11-stable later >>>> today. >>>> >>> >>> That sounds great! Thanks for your work. I guess I would still need to >>> compile and install 11-STABLE userland before trying it? >>> >> >> I'm not sure but that sounds like a good choice so you don't end up with >> some weirdness in userland/kernel mismatch. >> > > Usually only building the kernel is enough. > Thank you Johannes and Hans for your responses. I will install 11.3 once it's out and upgrade kernel to see if this works. GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 17:51:34 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9D61025420 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A1B880B7 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 05EA4102541D; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7612102541C for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84341880B1 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59182A190 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5LHpWan015311 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5LHpW8U015310 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228330] x11/polybar: Fix build against x11/xcb-proto 1.13 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tcberner@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tcberner@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status flagtypes.name cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228330 Tobias C. Berner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress Flags|maintainer-feedback?(x11@Fr |maintainer-feedback? |eeBSD.org) | CC| |tcberner@freebsd.org Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |tcberner@freebsd.org --- Comment #9 from Tobias C. Berner --- maintainer timeout --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 18:04:55 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D05B10257DB for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E875088A53 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A559C10257DA; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B6B10257D9 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC6888A50 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EDFA2A329 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5LI4rcD060989 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5LI4r2l060988 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228330] x11/polybar: Fix build against x11/xcb-proto 1.13 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lebarondemerde@privacychain.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tcberner@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:04:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228330 Alexandre C. Guimar=C3=A3es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #193959|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from Alexandre C. Guimar=C3=A3es --- Created attachment 194467 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D194467&action= =3Dedit Fix build against xcb-proto-1.13. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 20:30:18 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4FD1027BCC for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223268D4CD for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CFE331027BCB; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1311027BCA for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A1E8D4CA for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC3C2B6D6 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5LKUGAH022386 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5LKUGus022385 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228330] x11/polybar: Fix build against x11/xcb-proto 1.13 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lebarondemerde@privacychain.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tcberner@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:30:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228330 Alexandre C. Guimar=C3=A3es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #193520|0 |1 is obsolete| | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 21:30:57 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D961000D78 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFC18F7B4 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 513FF1000D74; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCA91000D72 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30698F7B1 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C03D2C034 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5LLUsMx003164 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5LLUslF003163 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 186045] patch to x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse to support FlipXY Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Feedback Timeout X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:30:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D186045 w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |Feedback Timeout --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 09:36:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500131014B60 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA14588173 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 932E71014B5A; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8057B1014B52 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D86888171 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6233FA455 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5M9a7Qv016359 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5M9a7VF016357 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228673] [PATCH] graphics/mesa-dri - configure script fails with BSD grep Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228673 --- Comment #1 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: zeising Date: Fri Jun 22 09:35:05 UTC 2018 New revision: 473029 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/473029 Log: Add a patch to fix build with BSD grep Since this is not the default, no need to bump portrevision. PR: 228673 Submitted by: Stefan Esser Changes: head/graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-configure --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 09:36:57 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493851014BC5 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89F4881BE for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 825231014BC4; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F80F1014BC2 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08E89881B7 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB08A457 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5M9atfR017213 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5M9atr4017212 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228673] [PATCH] graphics/mesa-dri - configure script fails with BSD grep Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zeising@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:36:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228673 Niclas Zeising changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zeising@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|New |Closed --- Comment #2 from Niclas Zeising --- Fixed, thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:50:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF5D101C60D for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F397127F for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 282AE101C60B; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1683D101C60A for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A92EC7127C for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C58C8FD for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5MDo3OA076449 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w5MDo30a076448 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228330] x11/polybar: Fix build against x11/xcb-proto 1.13 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lebarondemerde@privacychain.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tcberner@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:50:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228330 Alexandre C. Guimar=C3=A3es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D15965 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=