From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 01:22:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E64715AC9F2 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570318281B for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 01:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id y22so7548036qtn.8 for ; Sat, 11 May 2019 18:21:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2d8GmcgXDnUwGwDTV2zYlGq0m0+GfYW5zDVF0SwAXH4=; b=14lOSWM/6ACVbRF/EUwoRJFnOf390PLIcZcPja5/oFjy3mfoH7sJnNtaOq5HCS33xT kB4oC/CM9YVlZQ1GFqUXJwKeu90CNn02dbLh4LntSey0fFimOOXRwcTEwiJa/NaYBGVu ubYqfqm+OdRvLUlxt4sKXeMf0Dr824h34FcrIJrh2l7x0Xcni7WV6fNu0FiQaZF7oBJG 3Dm8aiZlVDdHdSjzG0LjJE+RVciWOSiAQCPLNVE1rJyoGB/betRiNRYGSAIAXwGAwgGK mGlRI0MDVch4CCmGdJNW9AxNqjUT3R+Fxk27IQxeKaawCG/ZMl9HLyyZP1ZJOCRogDeW 4Rvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2d8GmcgXDnUwGwDTV2zYlGq0m0+GfYW5zDVF0SwAXH4=; b=CNgocKbz3g5pULNuh5RJrJRWkzPoQZ+Hs5/ZS1v+IPytCPie5ddqHoasghxdK/CZuv QIba+PJiWNo9WjbCaeiouEMHGO75KLVlxYJdnQ3P9xr4AwJDUnd0VS/zFVt58R4Bqdgi joimVqqhAnBK3YbIDWHfb6alk6ZzJRbOrkCkksA4MHFliry0e+Ae4xgKmoh4tEio+XyO NZfIgEIhN+WtMnuuWR1Decom/4Q/p+xRujFhZx675MecXJg2Nk9Mt3LHWocn2ZzPH1bC Vfs6rjkmVBdWRMY+56dKBHSur4ob1GZmqy5eBBQkYMCwrHy7lJJoU+iE7TTNTmLY4a7S UvOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUplcmO8+bQ59OLhgNNToOuvGuElSm2XexeC/l/3Tnr1HGlMtO6 gSZ5NAXlvlw0wtJ9/5DNtK7EYO1evA/xuVpNf0VjWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3Nquu1+b97Ia8+wB2ZHJApJXq8V+2KBGZVINDWPPt/8Jt5Js3MdKCOi48ptML7RF/YLWcMon9u8w/5s2jPZo= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:875:: with SMTP id x50mr16715900qth.345.1557624118592; Sat, 11 May 2019 18:21:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201905111433.x4BEWnlX058386@fire.js.berklix.net> <3c911071-f794-1e27-87e1-16a789a95852@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <3c911071-f794-1e27-87e1-16a789a95852@grosbein.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 20:21:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" , Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 570318281B X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=14lOSWM/ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.91 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: ALT1.aspmx.l.google.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.948,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.95)[ip: (-9.18), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.25), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 01:22:01 -0000 On Sat, May 11, 2019, 12:52 PM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 11.05.2019 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > >> as previous approved in FCP-101. > >> The following drivers are slated for > >> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > >> > >> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > > > > OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > > spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > > Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants that have 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about 12Mbps due to bus limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii connections. Warner > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 02:20:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA5A1589153 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F6284214 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 179FC1589152; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05624158914E for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964F684101 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D568915619 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4C2Kfav013073 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4C2KfTC013071 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237843] arp: Skips all name lookups if first fail with TRY_AGAIN Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status keywords short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 02:20:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237843 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open Keywords| |needs-qa Summary|arp skips all name lookups |arp: Skips all name lookups |if first fall with |if first fail with |TRY_AGAIN |TRY_AGAIN CC| |koobs@FreeBSD.org, | |net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak --- Thank you for the report Pete "removing the line which sets 'nflag' to 1 after a TRY_AGAIN results in thi= s." If the above refers to a patch to attempt to fix the issue, could you please include it as an attachment --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 06:54:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562A0158EB94 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18048B470 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9F581158EB93; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A01158EB92 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F207E8B46C for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4882017DB6 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4C6s9XQ098863 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4C6s9YV098862 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 128030] [ipsec] Enable IPSec in GENERIC kernel configuration Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnn@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D128030 --- Comment #30 from Kubilay Kocak --- Author: gallatin Date: Thu May 9 22:38:15 2019 New Revision: 347410 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/347410 Log: Remove IPSEC from GENERIC due to performance issues Having IPSEC compiled into the kernel imposes a non-trivial performance penalty on multi-threaded workloads due to IPSEC refcounting. In my benchmarks of multi-threaded UDP transmit (connected sockets), I've seen a roughly 20% performance penalty when the IPSEC option is included in the kernel (16.8Mpps vs 13.8Mpps with 32 senders on a 14 core / 28 HTT Xeon 2697v3)). This is largely due to key_addref() incrementing and decrementing an atomic reference count on the default policy. This cause all CPUs to stall on the same cacheline, as it bounces between different CPUs. Given that relatively few users use ipsec, and that it can be loaded as a module, it seems reasonable to ask those users to load the ipsec module so as to avoid imposing this penalty on the GENERIC kernel. Its my hope that this will make FreeBSD look better in "out of the box" benchmark comparisons with other operating systems. Many thanks to ae for fixing auto-loading of ipsec.ko when ifconfig tries to configure ipsec, and to cy for volunteering to ensure the the racoon ports will load the ipsec.ko module Reviewed by: cem, cy, delphij, gnn, jhb, jpaetzel Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20163 Modified: head/UPDATING head/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC head/sys/arm/conf/std.armv6 head/sys/arm/conf/std.armv7 head/sys/arm64/conf/GENERIC head/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC head/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC head/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64 head/sys/riscv/conf/GENERIC head/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 06:54:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3A0158EBDB; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB30E8B4CB; Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id r4so11756593wro.10; Sat, 11 May 2019 23:54:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2LJRz5rJO7hmq+4/aVUhlhZk7qVsKHsi2P0YtZGUk0o=; b=DWtOHAA5PisbMXLjJLapjuTmMx3w7Qaj8cbIeVBDf0Qz0jCOxHkGHZI1rc92GYLwlX T6I7kBzCtP60/PYMy+8IB1Q6zN7zQmCsPhRQWE2ytnNZcM6/Hj9LGz6w6SA7a0rEkurw RPErhW6NR9ae4zv76J2DIcuZC1LQpB9aLnGFULr0m541YWH0kB3TmbujzKZeArd1uE21 1FKUVmvEfhVduQPkTFjG0/UVa4LQGWqTchXipeNXmbgC+2jWUmYSA/JfFc1kbhFj+tbU azvpa4qOswzuxjhsU50CGC1OZNaOS9KQDxTpc4SLOAxbDPI20ZFXxNq9p9vpI3IKWYoR CWig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2LJRz5rJO7hmq+4/aVUhlhZk7qVsKHsi2P0YtZGUk0o=; b=p6DHBtcIW/XanOh39yK1QaQCCxY+RXyduUdWsjhNvAmKFM4PLxqPO0ISsUgriTl1YK XGACMG/5cANmzqCWCsxjAZaLM5nsTfYkJ8OjRX/S+Za1dKSnugbqg0bCBwmkBsQYHaLf 7RkQau4pQOsSvZdLmQcJFQpkZmyhjFv2NmXM2IPhbTVcd9VL7B1qMxxqxRp4osDErEfh ZP/31G5SwKoTqSDYEGNVuWfvwTibN6fxgRKuBahGcQ+/mUuC+STtPdfeP7+5tCzZWTX/ aKKyAjQtYgkAlF3uKxFFSc37GFoa8v8Sgk2iS2V8xHRHH0+35U6NZFOAzJ3l//hNU7T6 bUfA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVr76By8i033kdJJAF4LQxMFz5Hz4uysLNMdeOfUSVob7dkl9z8 /Pv8/VkZ4ijbHs29fEFXjI8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy3EJtvYhvc2tY1vMULUMRe4XNVb5b5YrbQ4yOE2hkJv6JSCjSQsbN3a1FqKmTJ3jAkNqpdIw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9023:: with SMTP id h32mr1594012wrh.95.1557644082271; Sat, 11 May 2019 23:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.home (p5B023DB3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.2.61.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm13613604wro.85.2019.05.11.23.54.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 May 2019 23:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 08:54:35 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Warner Losh Cc: Eugene Grosbein , "Julian H. Stacey" , Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 Message-ID: <20190512085435.0b7dc847@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: References: <201905111433.x4BEWnlX058386@fire.js.berklix.net> <3c911071-f794-1e27-87e1-16a789a95852@grosbein.net> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AB30E8B4CB X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DWtOHAA5; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gljennjohn@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::431 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.58 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[gljennjohn@gmail.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.77)[-0.774,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.79)[ip: (-9.42), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.23), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 06:54:45 -0000 On Sat, 11 May 2019 20:21:46 -0500 Warner Losh wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2019, 12:52 PM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > 11.05.2019 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > > >> as previous approved in FCP-101. > > >> The following drivers are slated for > > >> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > > >> > > >> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > > > > > > OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > > > spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > > > > Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > > What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > > More relevant questions might be 1) will these drivers only be removed from FBSD >= 13? 2) what versions of FBSD is Julian now running on his hardware? 3) does he ever plan to upgrade this hardware to >= FBSD 13? I know Julian and he has an amazing collection of old hardware. I suspect that most of it will not even be able to run FBSD 13. > > There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants that have > 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about 12Mbps due to bus > limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii connections. > -- Gary Jennejohn (gj@) From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 09:22:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571C315922C5 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39B78F67E for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A792C15922C3; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953BB15922C2 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7048F677 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AEB191F7 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4C9MMpn080707 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4C9MMTH080698 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237843] arp: Skips all name lookups if first fail with TRY_AGAIN Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pete@twisted.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 09:22:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237843 --- Comment #3 from pete@twisted.org.uk --- Wasn't supposed to be a patch, as its not a real fix - its removing intended functionality to let me debug what was going on, which is not a great way to proceed, but for reference the diff looks like this: --- arp.c 2019-05-12 10:20:57.920473000 +0100 +++ /usr/src/usr.sbin/arp/arp.c 2018-11-11 17:59:35.794752000 +0000 @@ -605,8 +605,11 @@ hp =3D 0; if (hp) host =3D hp->h_name; - else + else { host =3D "?"; + if (h_errno =3D=3D TRY_AGAIN) + nflag =3D 1; + } xo_emit("{:hostname/%s} ({:ip-address/%s}) at ", host, inet_ntoa(addr->sin_addr)); if (sdl->sdl_alen) { --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 09:23:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF24159234F for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EF28F8B2 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 86E67159234C; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757B7159234B for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 156658F8B0 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E97D19343 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4C9Nus8007299 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4C9NuwI007291 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237843] arp: Skips all name lookups if first fail with TRY_AGAIN Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pete@twisted.org.uk X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 09:23:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237843 --- Comment #4 from pete@twisted.org.uk --- Gah, thats backwards of course! here it is with the arguments the right way round :) --- /usr/src/usr.sbin/arp/arp.c 2018-11-11 17:59:35.794752000 +0000 +++ arp.c 2019-05-12 10:20:57.920473000 +0100 @@ -605,11 +605,8 @@ hp =3D 0; if (hp) host =3D hp->h_name; - else { + else host =3D "?"; - if (h_errno =3D=3D TRY_AGAIN) - nflag =3D 1; - } xo_emit("{:hostname/%s} ({:ip-address/%s}) at ", host, inet_ntoa(addr->sin_addr)); if (sdl->sdl_alen) { --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 10:32:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C7C15938A1 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7176B6AA11 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 31FE215938A0; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB11159389F for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DC86AA07 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BF519D32 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4CAWMiV085363 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4CAWMLH085362 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 128030] [ipsec] Enable IPSec in GENERIC kernel configuration Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: 000.fbsd@quip.cz X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnn@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 10:32:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D128030 Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |000.fbsd@quip.cz --- Comment #31 from Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> --- Was or will be ipsec related ports maintainers notified about this change / need of kldload? E.g. security/strongswan --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 17:01:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2A2159C2F9; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "eg.sd.rdtc.ru", Issuer "eg.sd.rdtc.ru" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA1480174; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: brooks@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.4] (dadv@[10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4CH0iRA049132 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:44 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 To: Warner Losh References: <201905111433.x4BEWnlX058386@fire.js.berklix.net> <3c911071-f794-1e27-87e1-16a789a95852@grosbein.net> Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" , Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:42 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6EA1480174 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.12)[-0.118,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.61)[0.607,0]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.01)[-0.010,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: RU(0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29072, ipnet:2a03:3100::/32, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 17:01:11 -0000 12.05.2019 8:21, Warner Losh wrote: > >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > >> as previous approved in FCP-101. > >> The following drivers are slated for > >> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > >> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > > OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > > spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants that have 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about 12Mbps due to bus limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii connections. There was RTL8029AS "NE2000-compatible" 100M 32 bit PCI 2.1 adapter. Not sure if ed(4) supports RTL8029AS. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 17:13:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB603159C87D for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "eg.sd.rdtc.ru", Issuer "eg.sd.rdtc.ru" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2FEF80768; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: brooks@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4CHD385049241 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 May 2019 00:13:03 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 To: Warner Losh References: <201905111433.x4BEWnlX058386@fire.js.berklix.net> <3c911071-f794-1e27-87e1-16a789a95852@grosbein.net> Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" , Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <653f20cf-7ea8-9688-8233-8ad59e6febd8@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 00:12:56 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D2FEF80768 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.51 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[cached]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.28)[-0.284,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.52)[0.516,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.12)[-0.122,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: RU(0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29072, ipnet:2a03:3100::/32, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 17:13:17 -0000 13.05.2019 0:00, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 12.05.2019 8:21, Warner Losh wrote: > >> >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers >> >> as previous approved in FCP-101. >> >> The following drivers are slated for >> >> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): >> >> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe >> > OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of >> > spare) that will never be able to upgrade. >> Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? >> What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? >> >> There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants that have 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about 12Mbps due to bus limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii connections. > > There was RTL8029AS "NE2000-compatible" 100M 32 bit PCI 2.1 adapter. > Not sure if ed(4) supports RTL8029AS. Sorry, my memory failed me. RTL8029AS was capable of 10Mbps full duplex (20Mbps in total) but had 10BaseT transceiver only. I wonder what is applicability of 10Mbps hardware these days. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 17:18:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C099A159CAF8 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A551B80975 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:18:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id z19so3286316qtz.13 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:18:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3fvZ7w7BaRkWP7k3ZDdbF/Z7b15Y7ExHi3kLfecnTYg=; b=JfPzz55dXMlQRASDdeY1Q7erUFyplj46fn0gRjhfIkNalKbI/4bBwNOiyuhzj9Tfft zWE4QZS/cVmBw/AIIoEhH+hr8CgTQaret0viOQJ8Cq2vAPJUpFfW9ARMQhJ7kLrvCP3a YThlNg78LLteILTji4E0e1ZstF6HFl4jzNYlSvlderjNy30TC/76YMIHxpHgiCyd/JPb /RbMTW53dLcygeF84U9fI5HSHUCvOmDSWMpoF/yxmnkvb/Ilc3cLY/zFWI3/tvrCEVNE UM0KMFSQV9JpszV4nlckPNGzlVBXzfnHOAehr6yPMiGEdIToJGB7Ly04gJ5CUN5jU/jP Fd8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3fvZ7w7BaRkWP7k3ZDdbF/Z7b15Y7ExHi3kLfecnTYg=; b=gk8uP9QSSOnopKevC2oG/7MFryA4Ka5E5/zDndpoZCvIOzCoLSmAoVf5arVaO6yRzM vP0lkJL5E1pgUbQOQbti3NIdhpAEmwtvvIYoGkpY4H9q4ZLGBd2i0rwWUQPbjR6OQpFS nLW5yvUh8NrUFZoZd9OWEymbTJ0Sd1Y6wYlfL11sJPCDtMaFRC1BhcxVh7MrKak9+rgB nSKZ8zTSVESVjX6j9vrqJohRp7KJJKXs2Yymw4C0WLT6c2/admESlb8snJJjQu4cySLs InG7OOehTNg+LvA+woHZ0/j+FrTDAEGlKVacSGjgdZyZmQ3Z2LpYHhjgTYcJgm6w9D/F AmcA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWR00ImnSJpm02VLx0YkbHUocbf+ESsl2P+5O705rseBybVTaVx KdhMHOb20WLBgJjw5qVmLXYTK9nrfOFnveFXijtPlw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpNnM49tU+YQZYf3AKctedqQyIx9s2NDJ5tz7T3VV9z6JfOyv1bVkdd6S1YO84Y0/3q2oaQAcTxal57IU9s+Y= X-Received: by 2002:aed:3c6d:: with SMTP id u42mr14910599qte.118.1557681489988; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:18:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201905111433.x4BEWnlX058386@fire.js.berklix.net> <3c911071-f794-1e27-87e1-16a789a95852@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 12:17:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" , Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A551B80975 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=JfPzz55d X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.94 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: ALT1.aspmx.l.google.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.97)[ip: (-9.27), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.24), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 17:18:12 -0000 On Sun, May 12, 2019, 12:00 PM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 12.05.2019 8:21, Warner Losh wrote: > > > >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet > drivers > > >> as previous approved in FCP-101. > > >> The following drivers are slated for > > >> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > > >> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, > xe > > > OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > > > spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > > Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > > What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > > > There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants that have > 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about 12Mbps due to bus > limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii connections. > > There was RTL8029AS "NE2000-compatible" 100M 32 bit PCI 2.1 adapter. > Not sure if ed(4) supports RTL8029AS. > It does, but there is the same limitations. The card can't do DMA, so it's limited by inb/outb limitations. It also only has a 10Mbps transceiver built in. If people sold 100M attachments, it still won't do much more than 10Mbps. Warner > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 17:45:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5C9159D6BA; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F60081BFC; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x4CHjmso037514; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x4CHjmiw037513; Sun, 12 May 2019 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201905121745.x4CHjmiw037513@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 In-Reply-To: To: Eugene Grosbein Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT) CC: Warner Losh , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" , Brooks Davis , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6F60081BFC X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.56 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.74)[0.745,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: gndrsh.dnsmgr.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.94)[0.944,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.93)[0.933,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.05)[ip: (0.16), ipnet: 69.59.192.0/19(0.08), asn: 13868(0.05), country: US(-0.06)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 17:45:56 -0000 > 12.05.2019 8:21, Warner Losh wrote: > > > >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > > >> as previous approved in FCP-101. > > >> The following drivers are slated for > > >> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > > >> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > > > OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > > > spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > > Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > > What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > > > There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants that have 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about 12Mbps due to bus limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii connections. > > There was RTL8029AS "NE2000-compatible" 100M 32 bit PCI 2.1 adapter. > Not sure if ed(4) supports RTL8029AS. That is what I was hunting for, but I can not seem to locate a data sheet on that. I also thought there was a 100mb version of the DP83905, but can not seem to locate any data thier either. Given this lack of findable data I shall continue to support the ed removal, unless Julian comes up with the needed criteria, and with holding my own fact that I do have a pile of these around, but they are not in use and are only retained for testing and resurection of ancient things. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 17:52:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6BB159DA92 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:52:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from outbound3d.ore.mailhop.org (outbound3d.ore.mailhop.org [54.186.57.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FCCA822D1 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557683534; cv=none; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; b=wC6rarLyHQYL4HlvM+or6pqwmbFjYR15ZLuTH5Hjg24kwxaw8F0uVAkSBCDIhPUSueGbkOy0kvK9e arxHTyC2Q0qSc3QFzQ74HI9b778Ta8Wn1/lG4M0ag9kdoMO8mKQtK9Yq0eKBGyReDksy4GwDie0OCB XstUbeg4eil607rj4DDFRlwb7/QKSWuaAq7nDxHTrf1icP7fZHC1WCi2Pjvd2K6kbui6tYu7LTaWoo VM+x+0zQVFpOyiMzscn0K32SXkzF2r8XVQdRyKGJefPiUn9tlpXG+L+mAjRrJFkg3o9VgXw7VNI0AA l5wlkQ5nSMPP2mU/hZj6/+pjYeNEWvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:dkim-signature:from; bh=HXIO6iKKhGZskqmIyGx5ElvGQKD0Tj7QQKkv7/NaoO8=; b=ZcX1rtHhAiXwfZCHv8JPXK/0pcu1zgbf6Bprk+imMjKAF4PVBBEUKAVl/1qIYU1gCRT1i/yvy7gwV ghx7XwRRcq/dLlk9BP3+G8twifAuDRZ1ZuT22EEZVuNaTLP3JermV4s6U0ekmIYFFEaMCy50Fmv99x 5jKdq4SAsN6fe7YX6OAoRE3KP2LWMW4s+OBZua2VVDk8P9yaQTCVOP6N9dlvqHKjmInMeOckO+LQlb 7U6KkY3ESr9USbE/rAZNwNUnHVh0St2fuTXKqp/jSFEvZ5V1cwZdl7q7EBV+BpgEn7+GC3f37k41Gx hPRH7/+czm62QdFysPcuOCbgcNLTZUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; outbound3.ore.mailhop.org; spf=softfail smtp.mailfrom=freebsd.org smtp.remote-ip=67.177.211.60; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org; arc=none header.oldest-pass=0; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=dkim-high; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from; bh=HXIO6iKKhGZskqmIyGx5ElvGQKD0Tj7QQKkv7/NaoO8=; b=N9OzDsbejqpXLjjVDnLpN0tZA5XXEqL+zGcIDO2pa/abKY6Tu+R53uMrxceqbEZQKM1XUmbsSHvpI bR6hyrZudplV5kXv8/1pMWYYUDrsmkVSjsKi6DA5jVOBsbxxq4YW0eLNiXuXNAMpaJowIj/c6fBXl4 /JhDQ4UsCAPGlO0925OAzdT0hrVMKwlV9mvTeKJQYP1O1BP8zejicueqUpoTORkakIwjvXa/t3wFn1 xpRw/q9DCqlcGTFCth6p2m86VBUf4C4zblMNr8xDBj5acG+5Ux/wGM51R8tjzwzb9xkIHQwUSnMeeo owHRUyfw4vlQd/Jlg3z7PRmtY0glVaQ== X-MHO-RoutePath: aGlwcGll X-MHO-User: a9afa26b-74de-11e9-990f-673a89bc4518 X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 67.177.211.60 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [67.177.211.60]) by outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id a9afa26b-74de-11e9-990f-673a89bc4518; Sun, 12 May 2019 17:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4CHq8Di059036; Sun, 12 May 2019 11:52:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <0c668e8b4edfddb055fc261b73de7cf9633c47ba.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 From: Ian Lepore To: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Eugene Grosbein Cc: Warner Losh , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 11:52:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: <201905121745.x4CHjmiw037513@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <201905121745.x4CHjmiw037513@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0FCCA822D1 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.97 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.971,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:54.186.0.0/15, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 17:52:22 -0000 On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:45 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > 12.05.2019 8:21, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > >> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 > > > Ethernet drivers > > > >> as previous approved in FCP-101. > > > >> The following drivers are slated for > > > >> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > > > >> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, > > > vx, wb, xe > > > > OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show > > > box of > > > > spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > > > Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > > > What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > > > > > There are no 100M ed variants. There are some PC Card variants > > > that have 100M MII connections, but they are limited to about > > > 12Mbps due to bus limits. Even the PCI ones didn't have 100M mii > > > connections. > > > > There was RTL8029AS "NE2000-compatible" 100M 32 bit PCI 2.1 > > adapter. > > Not sure if ed(4) supports RTL8029AS. > > That is what I was hunting for, but I can not seem to > locate a data sheet on that. > > I also thought there was a 100mb version of the DP83905, > but can not seem to locate any data thier either. > > Given this lack of findable data I shall continue to support > the ed removal, unless Julian comes up with the needed criteria, > and with holding my own fact that I do have a pile of these > around, but they are not in use and are only retained for > testing and resurection of ancient things. > We should not lose track of the fact that the operative question here isn't "are you using an ed(4) device?", but rather "do you have systems containing an ed(4) device which are capable of running freebsd 13 and that you plan on updating to freebsd 13 or later?" Many of the systems that contained these old devices don't have enough ram to run a modern version of freebsd. If you can't update the system to 13, you don't need ongoing ed(4) support. And make no mistake, ongoing support IS the issue -- it costs manpower we don't have much of to maintain old device drivers. -- Ian From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 12 21:01:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389B915A235A for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3FC8AE63 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8E7DE15A2356; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C42215A2355 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3808AE5A for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779141F585 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4CL10ML041947 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4CL10lq041943 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201905122101.x4CL10lq041943@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:00 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 21:01:02 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport In Progress | 235700 | oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with e New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 233952 | jme NICs non functional after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrad Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237391 | route get returns no result for network addresses 15 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 13 00:18:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536F315A6424; Mon, 13 May 2019 00:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80DDB90195; Mon, 13 May 2019 00:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52CF95.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.207.149]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x4D0HsUC088774 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 May 2019 02:17:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id x4D0HrFf048087; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:17:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x4D0HTkn085211; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:17:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201905130017.x4D0HTkn085211@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Eugene Grosbein cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs http://stolenvotes.uk User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 12 May 2019 04:11:07 +0700." <730e3c61-de6a-240b-5310-c29884750163@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 02:17:29 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 80DDB90195 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; URI_HIDDEN_PATH(1.00)[http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/customise]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.89)[0.891,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.61)[0.613,0]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: slim.berklix.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.90.185.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[149.207.82.46.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.17)[ip: (0.64), ipnet: 94.185.88.0/22(0.32), asn: 33824(-0.08), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 00:18:05 -0000 Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 11.05.2019 22:59, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >> 11.05.2019 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> > >>>> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > >>>> as previous approved in FCP-101. > >>>> The following drivers are slated for > >>>> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > >>>> > >>>> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > >>> > >>> OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > >>> spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > >> > >> Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > >> What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > > > Thanks for question. I ran a quick check: > > cd /usr/src; > > # Apply my patches: > > # customise `pwd` > > # http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/customise > > cd /sys/amd64/conf > > grep device [A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].small | grep ed > > DUAL.small:device ed > > FILM.small:device ed > > KING.small:device ed > > LAPA.small:device ed > > LAPD.small:device ed > > LAPL.small:device ed > > LAPN.small:device ed > > LOFT.small:device ed > > MINI.small:device ed > > SCAN.small:device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 15 iomem 0xd0000 iosiz 0x10000 > > SLIM.small:device ed > > SNOW.small:device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xc8000 > > WIND.small:device ed > > I've asked not for configuration files but for description of hardware. > ed(4) supports many different models. Some of them do 10Mbps only > but some are 100M-capable including PCI-connected. > > And it's interesting to know what is CPU and memory type/amount of boxes. Info I had long pre saved, exported here: http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/hosts/ Many boxes run newer releases than logs show, but eg dmesg shows memory etc. Re Gary's: > 2) what versions of FBSD is Julian now running on his hardware? > 3) does he ever plan to upgrade this hardware to >= FBSD 13? Not many, if any of them; I should idealy find time to purge some, but I also have sundry newer PCs, & spare ed etc cards, so a pity to loose ed. More generaly It won't be just me with ed. With 13 I can power up any time, (+ other pcmcia & PCI & ISA cards in boxes) there's probably many more globaly. But sys admins often don't have time to read developer lists like current@ & arch@. So developer considering zapping things, will not be seen by users it will hit later. First many will know is seeing in a RELNOTES "XYZ will be removed in release [0-9].[0-9]" No chance to answer an earlier "Are many still using XYZ, we're thinking of deleting it ?" If ed is the biggest legacy NIC, best be cautious ? (BTW I also have 2 boxes running today's current, not just old Rels here.) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Consultant Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich Aachen Kent http://stolenvotes.uk Brexit ref. stole votes from 700,000 Brits in EU. Lies bought; Groups fined; 1.9 M young had no vote, 1.3 M old leavers died. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 13 02:27:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3147515A86F3; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5943493127; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x4D2Qrg3039316; Sun, 12 May 2019 19:26:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x4D2QnWY039315; Sun, 12 May 2019 19:26:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201905130226.x4D2QnWY039315@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 In-Reply-To: <201905130017.x4D0HTkn085211@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Julian H. Stacey" Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 19:26:49 -0700 (PDT) CC: Eugene Grosbein , Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5943493127 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.51 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.73)[0.729,0]; URI_HIDDEN_PATH(1.00)[http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/customise]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: gndrsh.dnsmgr.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.85)[0.849,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.05)[ip: (0.16), ipnet: 69.59.192.0/19(0.08), asn: 13868(0.05), country: US(-0.06)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 02:27:05 -0000 > Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > 11.05.2019 22:59, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > >> 11.05.2019 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >> > > >>>> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > > >>>> as previous approved in FCP-101. > > >>>> The following drivers are slated for > > >>>> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > > >>>> > > >>>> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe > > >>> > > >>> OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > > >>> spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > > >> > > >> Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > > >> What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > > > > > Thanks for question. I ran a quick check: > > > cd /usr/src; > > > # Apply my patches: > > > # customise `pwd` > > > # http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/customise > > > cd /sys/amd64/conf > > > grep device [A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].small | grep ed > > > DUAL.small:device ed > > > FILM.small:device ed > > > KING.small:device ed > > > LAPA.small:device ed > > > LAPD.small:device ed > > > LAPL.small:device ed > > > LAPN.small:device ed > > > LOFT.small:device ed > > > MINI.small:device ed > > > SCAN.small:device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 15 iomem 0xd0000 iosiz 0x10000 > > > SLIM.small:device ed > > > SNOW.small:device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xc8000 > > > WIND.small:device ed > > > > I've asked not for configuration files but for description of hardware. > > ed(4) supports many different models. Some of them do 10Mbps only > > but some are 100M-capable including PCI-connected. > > > > And it's interesting to know what is CPU and memory type/amount of boxes. > > Info I had long pre saved, exported here: > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/hosts/ > Many boxes run newer releases than logs show, but eg dmesg shows memory etc. It would help if you could run this from the hosts directory above and post the output here, I doubt anyone besides me well bother looking any further than this email at this data, but they well if you post this output: find . -type f | grep /dmesg | xargs egrep 'CPU:|real memory|Ethernet' That should give us machine name by file path, CPU type, memory and what ethernet cards are in it. I found one box, the second one I looked at, http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/hosts/logs/blak/dmesg0 that clearly has enough CPU and memory to run 13: CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (334.09-MHz 686-class CPU) real memory = 536858624 (511 MB) ed0: at port 0x240-0x25f iomem 0xcc000-0xcffff irq 5 pnpid EDI0119 on isa0 ed0: [ITHREAD] ed0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface ed0: Ethernet address: 00:00:b4:36:a5:04 > Re Gary's: > > 2) what versions of FBSD is Julian now running on his hardware? > > 3) does he ever plan to upgrade this hardware to >= FBSD 13? > > Not many, if any of them; I should idealy find time to purge some, > but I also have sundry newer PCs, & spare ed etc cards, so a pity to loose ed. > > > More generaly It won't be just me with ed. With 13 I can power up any time, > (+ other pcmcia & PCI & ISA cards in boxes) there's probably many more globaly. > > But sys admins often don't have time to read developer lists like > current@ & arch@. So developer considering zapping things, will > not be seen by users it will hit later. > > First many will know is seeing in a RELNOTES "XYZ will be removed > in release [0-9].[0-9]" No chance to answer an earlier "Are many > still using XYZ, we're thinking of deleting it ?" I believe all of the proposed cards have been announcing they are gone in FreeBSD 13 starting at FreeBSD 12. I am NOT clear if these gonein notices got backported to 11, if not they should be ASAP as getting notice out to the 11.3 users is important too. > If ed is the biggest legacy NIC, best be cautious ? I agree to some extent, but have no hard use evedence. > (BTW I also have 2 boxes running today's current, not just old Rels here.) > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, Consultant Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich Aachen Kent > http://stolenvotes.uk Brexit ref. stole votes from 700,000 Brits in EU. > Lies bought; Groups fined; 1.9 M young had no vote, 1.3 M old leavers died. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 13 02:39:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1B515A8C37 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com (mail-qk1-x744.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::744]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A73D99379A for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 02:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id j1so7078657qkk.12 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 19:39:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rSI1uiXzXBL5E+ncyE/kAwGw4cGbyfPPHq5gaEJuv6o=; b=CUmpGGoixep2FWw3mJrV+7uA7wc70SirmuDYh0q3ZYXnRSwEF9dMKchrqusetW21Tx Vy2U6Mc42TjC9ssy+uMmwe3c9cMS4AEQCMZhvWjO01WxXnPucvqHEWW78cKSxqiNNh3c vTOpaL9g/Cih7TMjtBqj7lfND6vOqFLszIS+UoN0sjlMu7e/ris95WCPo4RHte/r3YGJ YUpSAnzZvOAjxr4kT+SkeJ2jVjDgGOECzgKrSW3sZ0QtFnsAi6skftlAEZbe+jpX2nmS of5AeX9jEZp82I5fHD539F84cHm5e+t9GYo1wioLZcDmbVewkspHxjAxMLwmtgc7qD7w JR7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rSI1uiXzXBL5E+ncyE/kAwGw4cGbyfPPHq5gaEJuv6o=; b=hC6oVSb8DC280qH/DTUj6DvM0ebDy/qQ6WHe79iA/RC6ggSCNjwwVRvTBeGoWBM9YB amLG9IngPshqhpEvn/wF03Ray7P6g9rXaOW9phaecdjklkZn5XolXHRFDL1Pno7UOKfh r7v5ZdhnylzcnAH2xr3S6p79EQ81cKVGE5K3m1B39WVnQqcnG5srcgynTiF6TBXuPtr3 kj7m8eLyjU0T2oUfUyBKgHQY2beSEVGYEP38tXVqIz/OJA6Tt3lHOeKgT4BvN8LZvF3d 48Vh0AXtzPazkGpV00f4+Q/ydXqHfeksGfQcmKBupd6iUBotvKV/1XYd5veRhLMG+v0Z oWuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5Nd4OVpCSd3/AqwNRWjzkRfqfolBxfWJB/sG9z07FkH25hriB nBZCrhbRaTZnF4/JmY0vzonIi/iDj0kZ+Oso1itxVA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwreZnTOCz19gSwPsSwMkzb2khY60zi1Tih1vtDaz2z9ADLHgklV9IfiK0VmbXQITuA7oh69k4rISP+mIKT2p4= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9747:: with SMTP id z68mr21170758qkd.245.1557715150545; Sun, 12 May 2019 19:39:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201905130017.x4D0HTkn085211@fire.js.berklix.net> <201905130226.x4D2QnWY039315@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201905130226.x4D2QnWY039315@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 21:38:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" , Eugene Grosbein , Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A73D99379A X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=CUmpGGoi X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; URI_HIDDEN_PATH(1.00)[http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/customise]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.896,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[ALT1.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx.l.google.com,ALT2.aspmx.l.google.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.4.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.79)[-0.787,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; IP_SCORE(-0.84)[ip: (1.38), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.25), asn: 15169(-2.26), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 02:39:13 -0000 On Sun, May 12, 2019, 9:28 PM Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > 11.05.2019 22:59, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > >> 11.05.2019 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>> I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet > drivers > > > >>>> as previous approved in FCP-101. > > > >>>> The following drivers are slated for > > > >>>> removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > > > >>>> > > > >>>> ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, > xe > > > >>> > > > >>> OMG ! ed ! That EOL's loads of PC boxes I have (& a show box of > > > >>> spare) that will never be able to upgrade. > > > >> > > > >> Do those boxes have 10M-only or 100Mbps variants of ed(4)? > > > >> What kind of hardware do they have (CPU and memory-wise)? > > > > > > > > Thanks for question. I ran a quick check: > > > > cd /usr/src; > > > > # Apply my patches: > > > > # customise `pwd` > > > > # http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/customise > > > > cd /sys/amd64/conf > > > > grep device [A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].small | grep ed > > > > DUAL.small:device ed > > > > FILM.small:device ed > > > > KING.small:device ed > > > > LAPA.small:device ed > > > > LAPD.small:device ed > > > > LAPL.small:device ed > > > > LAPN.small:device ed > > > > LOFT.small:device ed > > > > MINI.small:device ed > > > > SCAN.small:device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 15 iomem 0xd0000 iosiz > 0x10000 > > > > SLIM.small:device ed > > > > SNOW.small:device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xc8000 > > > > WIND.small:device ed > > > > > > I've asked not for configuration files but for description of hardware. > > > ed(4) supports many different models. Some of them do 10Mbps only > > > but some are 100M-capable including PCI-connected. > > > > > > And it's interesting to know what is CPU and memory type/amount of > boxes. > > > > Info I had long pre saved, exported here: > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/hosts/ > > Many boxes run newer releases than logs show, but eg dmesg shows memory > etc. > > It would help if you could run this from the hosts directory above and > post the output here, I doubt anyone besides me well bother looking > any further than this email at this data, but they well if you post > this output: > > find . -type f | grep /dmesg | xargs egrep 'CPU:|real memory|Ethernet' > > That should give us machine name by file path, CPU type, memory and > what ethernet cards are in it. > > I found one box, the second one I looked at, > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/hosts/logs/blak/dmesg0 > that clearly has enough CPU and memory to run 13: > CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (334.09-MHz 686-class CPU) > real memory = 536858624 (511 MB) > ed0: at port 0x240-0x25f iomem 0xcc000-0xcffff > irq 5 pnpid EDI0119 on isa0 > ed0: [ITHREAD] > ed0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface > ed0: Ethernet address: 00:00:b4:36:a5:04 > > > Re Gary's: > > > 2) what versions of FBSD is Julian now running on his hardware? > > > 3) does he ever plan to upgrade this hardware to >= FBSD 13? > > > > Not many, if any of them; I should idealy find time to purge some, > > but I also have sundry newer PCs, & spare ed etc cards, so a pity to > loose ed. > > > > > > More generaly It won't be just me with ed. With 13 I can power up any > time, > > (+ other pcmcia & PCI & ISA cards in boxes) there's probably many more > globaly. > > > > But sys admins often don't have time to read developer lists like > > current@ & arch@. So developer considering zapping things, will > > not be seen by users it will hit later. > > > > First many will know is seeing in a RELNOTES "XYZ will be removed > > in release [0-9].[0-9]" No chance to answer an earlier "Are many > > still using XYZ, we're thinking of deleting it ?" > > I believe all of the proposed cards have been announcing > they are gone in FreeBSD 13 starting at FreeBSD 12. > > I am NOT clear if these gonein notices got backported to > 11, if not they should be ASAP as getting notice out to > the 11.3 users is important too. > > > If ed is the biggest legacy NIC, best be cautious ? > > I agree to some extent, but have no hard use evedence. > Last time I ran the reports from nycbug dmesg reports. Ed was rare starting in 7, and absent 9 and newer. That suggests it's once dominant position has decayed to almost nothing in the 25 years since it was king. I'd included this data at some point in the past, I thought. Warner > (BTW I also have 2 boxes running today's current, not just old Rels here.) > > > > Cheers, > > Julian > > -- > > Julian Stacey, Consultant Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich > Aachen Kent > > http://stolenvotes.uk Brexit ref. stole votes from 700,000 Brits in > EU. > > Lies bought; Groups fined; 1.9 M young had no vote, 1.3 M old leavers > died. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > Rod Grimes > rgrimes@freebsd.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 13 09:29:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C87158886D; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@vnode.se) Received: from oden.vnode.se (oden.vnode.se [IPv6:2001:19f0:6c01:6b7:5400:1ff:fe33:16b1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oden.vnode.se", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3911A70BCB; Mon, 13 May 2019 09:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@vnode.se) Received: from ymer.vnode.se (62-20-154-136-no280.tbcn.telia.com [62.20.154.136]) by oden.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 940421F45E; Mon, 13 May 2019 11:29:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:29:45 +0200 From: Joel Dahl To: Brooks Davis Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-101: obsolete driver removal planned for 2019-05-18 Message-ID: <20190513092945.GA16125@ymer.vnode.se> Mail-Followup-To: Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20190510182712.GC37444@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190510182712.GC37444@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 09:29:55 -0000 On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 06:27:12PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers > as previous approved in FCP-101. The following drivers are slated for > removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13): > > ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe I've said it before and I'll try one last time. Can we save ae? I have one machine with ae, running 12. There are three dmesgs from NYC*BUG dmesgd containing ae cards, all running recent versions of FreeBSD. I also have ed, pcn and vx in a few machines, but I guess I'll have to live without those... -- Joel From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 14 07:01:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB5715A7024 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 07:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D22FB87FBF for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 07:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate2.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id x4E71982077441; Tue, 14 May 2019 09:01:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.29.44.36] ([217.29.44.36]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id x4E718fE001904; Tue, 14 May 2019 09:01:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) Subject: Re: VLANs for use with jails From: "Patrick M. Hausen" In-Reply-To: <2BE6B69D-FB37-49BA-AAA1-67531A4BE064@debilux.org> Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:01:06 +0200 Cc: Artem Viklenko via freebsd-net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2BE6B69D-FB37-49BA-AAA1-67531A4BE064@debilux.org> To: Christian Baer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D22FB87FBF X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hausen@punkt.de designates 217.29.33.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hausen@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.29.32.0/20]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailin.pluspunkthosting.de,mailin.pluspunkthosting.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[131.33.29.217.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.74)[-0.743,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.22)[ipnet: 217.29.32.0/20(-0.61), asn: 16188(-0.48), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 07:01:24 -0000 Hi! Not tested, minor typos possible ... > Am 10.05.2019 um 23:02 schrieb Christian Baer : > ifconfig_igb1=3D"inet 10.0.3.12/24 -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 = -lro -tso -vlanhwtso" > ifconfig_igb1_ipv6=3D"inet6 accept_rtadv -lro -tso=E2=80=9C=20 > [...] > What's the proper way to set up igb1 to be untagged (and so be in the = management vlan) and create the different VLANs on it and use it with = the jails? On of the VLANs should also be in the management VLAN (to = move my Unifi controller from a Pi to a jail). ifconfig_igb1=3D=E2=80=9Cup -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -lro -tso = -vlanhwtso=E2=80=9C cloned_interfaces=3D"vlan3 vlan4=E2=80=9C ifconfig_vlan3=3D"inet 10.0.3.12/24 vlan 3 vlandev igb1=E2=80=9C ifconfig_vlan4=3D"inet 10.0.4.12/24 vlan 4 vlandev igb1=E2=80=9C iocage set vlan3jail interfaces=3D"vnet0:vlan3" iocage set vlan3jail ip4_addr=3D"vnet0|10.0.3.13/24" iocage set vlan4jail interfaces=3D"vnet0:vlan4" iocage set vlan4jail ip4_addr=3D"vnet0|10.0.4.13/24" HTH, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 14 09:24:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCE715A9FE2 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 09:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-f174.google.com (mail-lj1-f174.google.com [209.85.208.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E0A8C8CE for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 09:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id j24so12829826ljg.1 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 02:24:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=imzvGPRXHq58Mx6reeKOm3tqn+08mRuOaHb9QWOByRQ=; b=YFdU2ukc1qXZAxSd8mbhtHgcATDrnkxFO/Cwb9lqe0U5xkY5nchLg7/tdzYWXCPpJQ 6Qf2OVwuy3o1rH6UYHYx8J9bJT4zlnHsPVkGxO/6zIQGoj8//GgRqxyIqSVGhJapq7JG Ql17gUbMfXl/7fySCyextx5rdyY1Z9rMfYe1GPlJ43gUQcG8Sdh9292/03Af3/gtY8lS ZTtGcL6rGFmcSoZ15ORaQlUhD8D8DfSdnUSfJsfJyuCPnJzvSYWsL83heKi6wKWisKJl 5CH2LpqPR0WZG5sO/IGhg7QLSfl0dDY3g6CQ8JA1ucGfWqU5UcyBF+h/RgA7MY/INTZz dR6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5V+pxkahXQ8//tXg39DFUfXIEyo5nIivweiHrA0gzZgNF4VoG mHyFgR2Oss0nKBtz7sXi5j3udxkf X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwp44LYSPOmB0xIqF1Uxpd4c/kz7ipb8DLN8P6czogFO+mk9GdG97WllET1VnUEHlQHV318lA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6384:: with SMTP id s4mr16421605lje.63.1557825440883; Tue, 14 May 2019 02:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm2351704ljb.68.2019.05.14.02.17.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 May 2019 02:17:19 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Subject: crash in dummynet, , si->sched Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFm4LIgBEADNB/3lT7f15UKeQ52xCFQx/GqHkSxEdVyLFZTmY3KyNPQGBtyvVyBfprJ7 mAeXZWfhat6cKNRAGZcL5EmewdQuUfQfBdYmKjbw3a9GFDsDNuhDA2QwFt8BmkiVMRYyvI7l N0eVzszWCUgdc3qqM6qqcgBaqsVmJluwpvwp4ZBXmch5BgDDDb1MPO8AZ2QZfIQmplkj8Y6Z AiNMknkmgaekIINSJX8IzRzKD5WwMsin70psE8dpL/iBsA2cpJGzWMObVTtCxeDKlBCNqM1i gTXta1ukdUT7JgLEFZk9ceYQQMJJtUwzWu1UHfZn0Fs29HTqawfWPSZVbulbrnu5q55R4PlQ /xURkWQUTyDpqUvb4JK371zhepXiXDwrrpnyyZABm3SFLkk2bHlheeKU6Yql4pcmSVym1AS4 dV8y0oHAfdlSCF6tpOPf2+K9nW1CFA8b/tw4oJBTtfZ1kxXOMdyZU5fiG7xb1qDgpQKgHUX8 7Rd2T1UVLVeuhYlXNw2F+a2ucY+cMoqz3LtpksUiBppJhw099gEXehcN2JbUZ2TueJdt1FdS ztnZmsHUXLxrRBtGwqnFL7GSd6snpGIKuuL305iaOGODbb9c7ne1JqBbkw1wh8ci6vvwGlzx rexzimRaBzJxlkjNfMx8WpCvYebGMydNoeEtkWldtjTNVsUAtQARAQABzR5BbmRyaXkgR2Fw b24gPGF2Z0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz7CwZQEEwEIAD4WIQS+LEO7ngQnXA4Bjr538m7TUc1yjwUC WbgsiAIbIwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRB38m7TUc1yj+JAEACV l9AK/nOWAt/9cufV2fRj0hdOqB1aCshtSrwHk/exXsDa4/FkmegxXQGY+3GWX3deIyesbVRL rYdtdK0dqJyT1SBqXK1h3/at9rxr9GQA6KWOxTjUFURsU7ok/6SIlm8uLRPNKO+yq0GDjgaO LzN+xykuBA0FlhQAXJnpZLcVfPJdWv7sSHGedL5ln8P8rxR+XnmsA5TUaaPcbhTB+mG+iKFj GghASDSfGqLWFPBlX/fpXikBDZ1gvOr8nyMY9nXhgfXpq3B6QCRYKPy58ChrZ5weeJZ29b7/ QdEO8NFNWHjSD9meiLdWQaqo9Y7uUxN3wySc/YUZxtS0bhAd8zJdNPsJYG8sXgKjeBQMVGuT eCAJFEYJqbwWvIXMfVWop4+O4xB+z2YE3jAbG/9tB/GSnQdVSj3G8MS80iLS58frnt+RSEw/ psahrfh0dh6SFHttE049xYiC+cM8J27Aaf0i9RflyITq57NuJm+AHJoU9SQUkIF0nc6lfA+o JRiyRlHZHKoRQkIg4aiKaZSWjQYRl5Txl0IZUP1dSWMX4s3XTMurC/pnja45dge/4ESOtJ9R 8XuIWg45Oq6MeIWdjKddGhRj3OohsltKgkEU3eLKYtB6qRTQypHHUawCXz88uYt5e3w4V16H lCpSTZV/EVHnNe45FVBlvK7k7HFfDDkryM7BTQRZuCyIARAAlq0slcsVboY/+IUJdcbEiJRW be9HKVz4SUchq0z9MZPX/0dcnvz/gkyYA+OuM78dNS7Mbby5dTvOqfpLJfCuhaNYOhlE0wY+ 1T6Tf1f4c/uA3U/YiadukQ3+6TJuYGAdRZD5EqYFIkreARTVWg87N9g0fT9BEqLw9lJtEGDY EWUE7L++B8o4uu3LQFEYxcrb4K/WKmgtmFcm77s0IKDrfcX4doV92QTIpLiRxcOmCC/OCYuO jB1oaaqXQzZrCutXRK0L5XN1Y1PYjIrEzHMIXmCDlLYnpFkK+itlXwlE2ZQxkfMruCWdQXye syl2fynAe8hvp7Mms9qU2r2K9EcJiR5N1t1C2/kTKNUhcRv7Yd/vwusK7BqJbhlng5ZgRx0m WxdntU/JLEntz3QBsBsWM9Y9wf2V4tLv6/DuDBta781RsCB/UrU2zNuOEkSixlUiHxw1dccI 6CVlaWkkJBxmHX22GdDFrcjvwMNIbbyfQLuBq6IOh8nvu9vuItup7qemDG3Ms6TVwA7BD3j+ 3fGprtyW8Fd/RR2bW2+LWkMrqHffAr6Y6V3h5kd2G9Q8ZWpEJk+LG6Mk3fhZhmCnHhDu6CwN MeUvxXDVO+fqc3JjFm5OxhmfVeJKrbCEUJyM8ESWLoNHLqjywdZga4Q7P12g8DUQ1mRxYg/L HgZY3zfKOqcAEQEAAcLBfAQYAQgAJhYhBL4sQ7ueBCdcDgGOvnfybtNRzXKPBQJZuCyIAhsM BQkFo5qAAAoJEHfybtNRzXKPBVwQAKfFy9P7N3OsLDMB56A4Kf+ZT+d5cIx0Yiaf4n6w7m3i ImHHHk9FIetI4Xe54a2IXh4Bq5UkAGY0667eIs+Z1Ea6I2i27Sdo7DxGwq09Qnm/Y65ADvXs 3aBvokCcm7FsM1wky395m8xUos1681oV5oxgqeRI8/76qy0hD9WR65UW+HQgZRIcIjSel9vR XDaD2HLGPTTGr7u4v00UeTMs6qvPsa2PJagogrKY8RXdFtXvweQFz78NbXhluwix2Tb9ETPk LIpDrtzV73CaE2aqBG/KrboXT2C67BgFtnk7T7Y7iKq4/XvEdDWscz2wws91BOXuMMd4c/c4 OmGW9m3RBLufFrOag1q5yUS9QbFfyqL6dftJP3Zq/xe+mr7sbWbhPVCQFrH3r26mpmy841ym dwQnNcsbIGiBASBSKksOvIDYKa2Wy8htPmWFTEOPRpFXdGQ27awcjjnB42nngyCK5ukZDHi6 w0qK5DNQQCkiweevCIC6wc3p67jl1EMFY5+z+zdTPb3h7LeVnGqW0qBQl99vVFgzLxchKcl0 R/paSFgwqXCZhAKMuUHncJuynDOP7z5LirUeFI8qsBAJi1rXpQoLJTVcW72swZ42IdPiboqx NbTMiNOiE36GqMcTPfKylCbF45JNX4nF9ElM0E+Y8gi4cizJYBRr2FBJgay0b9Cp Message-ID: <60237dd7-e507-ecf3-c9b0-ef3c4c2116ad@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 12:17:19 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49E0A8C8CE X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.22 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.926,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-1.28)[ip: (-0.48), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.59), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[174.208.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:24:54 -0000 Unfortunately, all we have is some information from a ddb text dump. We do not have a vmcore and we do not have a way to re-create the crash. It happened just once on a production system. So, the information follows. dn_enqueue fs 0 si 0, dropping Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x60 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff8077bdff stack pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe1096343910 frame pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe1096343920 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (dummynet) db:3:psinfo> bt Tracing pid 0 tid 100248 td 0xfffff8002829d4d0 stack1 drain_scheduler_cb+0x1f drain_scheduler_sch_cb+0x25 dn_ht_scan_bucket+0x7a dn_drain_scheduler+0x20 dummynet_task+0x219 taskqueue_run_locked+0x71 taskqueue_thread_loop+0x56 fork_exit+0x121 fork_trampoline+0xe drain_scheduler_cb+0x1f: movq 0x60(%rdx),%rax Here is disassembly of the function with some notes of mine: 0xffffffff8077bde0 <+0>: push %rbp 0xffffffff8077bde1 <+1>: testb $0x20,0x90(%rdi) // test DN_ACTIVE 0xffffffff8077bde8 <+8>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0xffffffff8077bdeb <+11>: jne 0xffffffff8077bdf4 0xffffffff8077bded <+13>: cmpq $0x0,0x78(%rdi) 0xffffffff8077bdf2 <+18>: je 0xffffffff8077bdf8 0xffffffff8077bdf4 <+20>: leaveq 0xffffffff8077bdf5 <+21>: xor %eax,%eax 0xffffffff8077bdf7 <+23>: retq 0xffffffff8077bdf8 <+24>: mov 0x88(%rdi),%rdx // rdx = si->sched 0xffffffff8077bdff <+31>: mov 0x60(%rdx),%rax // rax = si->sched->fp 0xffffffff8077be03 <+35>: testb $0x1,0x10(%rax) So, it seems that dummynet ran into dn_sch_inst with sched field being NULL. I am not sure how that could be possible. Also, I am not sure if that "dn_enqueue ..." message is related to the crash. Does anyone have any ideas? Thank you. P.S. I found a somewhat similar but different and very old report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166937 It seems that it was not really root-caused and fixed, but marked as fixed because of a chance that it could have been caused by flaky hardware. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 14 11:02:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C7415ABDAD for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com (mail-lj1-f193.google.com [209.85.208.193]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324958F9A9 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id r76so13863159lja.12 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:02:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BIe+F5EdIjCM2sPUAtmbCmG22aw/k43eqoabCZ1eLpw=; b=a5Xl0tp7hfldsza/9kVZfM/OU2XR8R+KdwXoMEI/Qn4/4y98hqDe4ohvaXAzUMAb6D S4VlrsotiqNQMEIwvTWbdU/lm5PlPCW/PVvF1ZueBGl5UMQBL4O9kNerehKgz4tAi6qD ZTPBwZlaVKXglCTxVikD6VWPz2pcnJjdh8o816MGLoIjpcrt2thE4qO1dAVWZllCojrl da8yu5KqR3QD1q2lNpuMRLAwwY0nJ/Btv5UowBebdu/Lioq6DVvsCv0dFv2gUmRm5bW8 df2S+NlWSBuvuZ/qbWPtcu7H3b4XrsryPhvFHsgF89wCGsWP/MuBjZU7CHy9fuqsoGbG ybEA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUr41/UBDXWY0aeCVf3leDBoAtBVxpX62LVCWX4cOP9tV6ajpH0 z6y0Jy4jCCqInc05N11+jUCuSpzN X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwbZpZrN9yGq66om70RkY2wKOADd/vBMEzzperBb0s2AuKl0tWI2B9A3Z6GiQycGhTSNKx3vw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:98c6:: with SMTP id s6mr16553018ljj.161.1557831379988; Tue, 14 May 2019 03:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm2108614lfh.79.2019.05.14.03.56.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 May 2019 03:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: crash in dummynet, drain_scheduler_cb, si->sched == NULL From: Andriy Gapon To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org References: <60237dd7-e507-ecf3-c9b0-ef3c4c2116ad@FreeBSD.org> Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFm4LIgBEADNB/3lT7f15UKeQ52xCFQx/GqHkSxEdVyLFZTmY3KyNPQGBtyvVyBfprJ7 mAeXZWfhat6cKNRAGZcL5EmewdQuUfQfBdYmKjbw3a9GFDsDNuhDA2QwFt8BmkiVMRYyvI7l N0eVzszWCUgdc3qqM6qqcgBaqsVmJluwpvwp4ZBXmch5BgDDDb1MPO8AZ2QZfIQmplkj8Y6Z AiNMknkmgaekIINSJX8IzRzKD5WwMsin70psE8dpL/iBsA2cpJGzWMObVTtCxeDKlBCNqM1i gTXta1ukdUT7JgLEFZk9ceYQQMJJtUwzWu1UHfZn0Fs29HTqawfWPSZVbulbrnu5q55R4PlQ /xURkWQUTyDpqUvb4JK371zhepXiXDwrrpnyyZABm3SFLkk2bHlheeKU6Yql4pcmSVym1AS4 dV8y0oHAfdlSCF6tpOPf2+K9nW1CFA8b/tw4oJBTtfZ1kxXOMdyZU5fiG7xb1qDgpQKgHUX8 7Rd2T1UVLVeuhYlXNw2F+a2ucY+cMoqz3LtpksUiBppJhw099gEXehcN2JbUZ2TueJdt1FdS ztnZmsHUXLxrRBtGwqnFL7GSd6snpGIKuuL305iaOGODbb9c7ne1JqBbkw1wh8ci6vvwGlzx rexzimRaBzJxlkjNfMx8WpCvYebGMydNoeEtkWldtjTNVsUAtQARAQABzR5BbmRyaXkgR2Fw b24gPGF2Z0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz7CwZQEEwEIAD4WIQS+LEO7ngQnXA4Bjr538m7TUc1yjwUC WbgsiAIbIwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRB38m7TUc1yj+JAEACV l9AK/nOWAt/9cufV2fRj0hdOqB1aCshtSrwHk/exXsDa4/FkmegxXQGY+3GWX3deIyesbVRL rYdtdK0dqJyT1SBqXK1h3/at9rxr9GQA6KWOxTjUFURsU7ok/6SIlm8uLRPNKO+yq0GDjgaO LzN+xykuBA0FlhQAXJnpZLcVfPJdWv7sSHGedL5ln8P8rxR+XnmsA5TUaaPcbhTB+mG+iKFj GghASDSfGqLWFPBlX/fpXikBDZ1gvOr8nyMY9nXhgfXpq3B6QCRYKPy58ChrZ5weeJZ29b7/ QdEO8NFNWHjSD9meiLdWQaqo9Y7uUxN3wySc/YUZxtS0bhAd8zJdNPsJYG8sXgKjeBQMVGuT eCAJFEYJqbwWvIXMfVWop4+O4xB+z2YE3jAbG/9tB/GSnQdVSj3G8MS80iLS58frnt+RSEw/ psahrfh0dh6SFHttE049xYiC+cM8J27Aaf0i9RflyITq57NuJm+AHJoU9SQUkIF0nc6lfA+o JRiyRlHZHKoRQkIg4aiKaZSWjQYRl5Txl0IZUP1dSWMX4s3XTMurC/pnja45dge/4ESOtJ9R 8XuIWg45Oq6MeIWdjKddGhRj3OohsltKgkEU3eLKYtB6qRTQypHHUawCXz88uYt5e3w4V16H lCpSTZV/EVHnNe45FVBlvK7k7HFfDDkryM7BTQRZuCyIARAAlq0slcsVboY/+IUJdcbEiJRW be9HKVz4SUchq0z9MZPX/0dcnvz/gkyYA+OuM78dNS7Mbby5dTvOqfpLJfCuhaNYOhlE0wY+ 1T6Tf1f4c/uA3U/YiadukQ3+6TJuYGAdRZD5EqYFIkreARTVWg87N9g0fT9BEqLw9lJtEGDY EWUE7L++B8o4uu3LQFEYxcrb4K/WKmgtmFcm77s0IKDrfcX4doV92QTIpLiRxcOmCC/OCYuO jB1oaaqXQzZrCutXRK0L5XN1Y1PYjIrEzHMIXmCDlLYnpFkK+itlXwlE2ZQxkfMruCWdQXye syl2fynAe8hvp7Mms9qU2r2K9EcJiR5N1t1C2/kTKNUhcRv7Yd/vwusK7BqJbhlng5ZgRx0m WxdntU/JLEntz3QBsBsWM9Y9wf2V4tLv6/DuDBta781RsCB/UrU2zNuOEkSixlUiHxw1dccI 6CVlaWkkJBxmHX22GdDFrcjvwMNIbbyfQLuBq6IOh8nvu9vuItup7qemDG3Ms6TVwA7BD3j+ 3fGprtyW8Fd/RR2bW2+LWkMrqHffAr6Y6V3h5kd2G9Q8ZWpEJk+LG6Mk3fhZhmCnHhDu6CwN MeUvxXDVO+fqc3JjFm5OxhmfVeJKrbCEUJyM8ESWLoNHLqjywdZga4Q7P12g8DUQ1mRxYg/L HgZY3zfKOqcAEQEAAcLBfAQYAQgAJhYhBL4sQ7ueBCdcDgGOvnfybtNRzXKPBQJZuCyIAhsM BQkFo5qAAAoJEHfybtNRzXKPBVwQAKfFy9P7N3OsLDMB56A4Kf+ZT+d5cIx0Yiaf4n6w7m3i ImHHHk9FIetI4Xe54a2IXh4Bq5UkAGY0667eIs+Z1Ea6I2i27Sdo7DxGwq09Qnm/Y65ADvXs 3aBvokCcm7FsM1wky395m8xUos1681oV5oxgqeRI8/76qy0hD9WR65UW+HQgZRIcIjSel9vR XDaD2HLGPTTGr7u4v00UeTMs6qvPsa2PJagogrKY8RXdFtXvweQFz78NbXhluwix2Tb9ETPk LIpDrtzV73CaE2aqBG/KrboXT2C67BgFtnk7T7Y7iKq4/XvEdDWscz2wws91BOXuMMd4c/c4 OmGW9m3RBLufFrOag1q5yUS9QbFfyqL6dftJP3Zq/xe+mr7sbWbhPVCQFrH3r26mpmy841ym dwQnNcsbIGiBASBSKksOvIDYKa2Wy8htPmWFTEOPRpFXdGQ27awcjjnB42nngyCK5ukZDHi6 w0qK5DNQQCkiweevCIC6wc3p67jl1EMFY5+z+zdTPb3h7LeVnGqW0qBQl99vVFgzLxchKcl0 R/paSFgwqXCZhAKMuUHncJuynDOP7z5LirUeFI8qsBAJi1rXpQoLJTVcW72swZ42IdPiboqx NbTMiNOiE36GqMcTPfKylCbF45JNX4nF9ElM0E+Y8gi4cizJYBRr2FBJgay0b9Cp Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 13:56:18 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <60237dd7-e507-ecf3-c9b0-ef3c4c2116ad@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 324958F9A9 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.193 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.17 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.977,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-1.18)[ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.59), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[193.208.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[193.208.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 11:02:54 -0000 Just fixing the subject. On 14/05/2019 12:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Unfortunately, all we have is some information from a ddb text dump. We do not > have a vmcore and we do not have a way to re-create the crash. It happened just > once on a production system. > > So, the information follows. > > dn_enqueue fs 0 si 0, dropping > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0x60 > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff8077bdff > stack pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe1096343910 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe1096343920 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 0 (dummynet) > > db:3:psinfo> bt > Tracing pid 0 tid 100248 td 0xfffff8002829d4d0 > stack1 drain_scheduler_cb+0x1f drain_scheduler_sch_cb+0x25 > dn_ht_scan_bucket+0x7a dn_drain_scheduler+0x20 dummynet_task+0x219 > taskqueue_run_locked+0x71 taskqueue_thread_loop+0x56 fork_exit+0x121 > fork_trampoline+0xe > > drain_scheduler_cb+0x1f: movq 0x60(%rdx),%rax > > Here is disassembly of the function with some notes of mine: > 0xffffffff8077bde0 <+0>: push %rbp > 0xffffffff8077bde1 <+1>: testb $0x20,0x90(%rdi) // test DN_ACTIVE > 0xffffffff8077bde8 <+8>: mov %rsp,%rbp > 0xffffffff8077bdeb <+11>: jne 0xffffffff8077bdf4 > 0xffffffff8077bded <+13>: cmpq $0x0,0x78(%rdi) > 0xffffffff8077bdf2 <+18>: je 0xffffffff8077bdf8 > 0xffffffff8077bdf4 <+20>: leaveq > 0xffffffff8077bdf5 <+21>: xor %eax,%eax > 0xffffffff8077bdf7 <+23>: retq > 0xffffffff8077bdf8 <+24>: mov 0x88(%rdi),%rdx // rdx = si->sched > 0xffffffff8077bdff <+31>: mov 0x60(%rdx),%rax // rax = si->sched->fp > 0xffffffff8077be03 <+35>: testb $0x1,0x10(%rax) > > So, it seems that dummynet ran into dn_sch_inst with sched field being NULL. > > I am not sure how that could be possible. > Also, I am not sure if that "dn_enqueue ..." message is related to the crash. > > Does anyone have any ideas? > Thank you. > > P.S. > I found a somewhat similar but different and very old report: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166937 > It seems that it was not really root-caused and fixed, but marked as fixed > because of a chance that it could have been caused by flaky hardware. > -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 14 17:15:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E8015935B0 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kathleen.brown@webtechiezone.com) Received: from IND01-BO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1390078.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.139.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B99750B4 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kathleen.brown@webtechiezone.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=NETORGFT4690007.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-webtechiezone-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+CncYZO98BQaPxKF3acipGtnr/n9NYVdU7tPVFjXezw=; b=dNyMlZqgZn92rjNiaFm/qJmyq0KmKdYcHGR4SvH+vYar06GFRfvtMWiJxJfkJh9r0FFIu8xQ8SYanjG7sQa26s/IUmaZ1vSj3S8VINMcZIGzbfgT1vRWdGzEO/nC/tOZwlPvRMSNtZnHRTYxPLADyB4XkLcoWtgvEyTbazmLkS8= Received: from BM1PR01MB2563.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (20.178.173.139) by BM1PR01MB3700.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.133.238.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1878.24; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:15:08 +0000 Received: from BM1PR01MB2563.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::79c3:b80c:5a73:d5e1]) by BM1PR01MB2563.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::79c3:b80c:5a73:d5e1%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1878.024; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:15:08 +0000 From: Kathleen Brown To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Splunk Users Contact List Thread-Topic: Splunk Users Contact List Thread-Index: AdUKd9TbBTjL6F2XRpCeoSGyMLzqAQ== Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:10:00 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [183.82.18.234] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 98e3d2fc-3a99-4c76-957d-08d6d88fb71d x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BM1PR01MB3700; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BM1PR01MB3700: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6108; x-forefront-prvs: 0037FD6480 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(346002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(39850400004)(189003)(199004)(7736002)(33656002)(76116006)(9326002)(2906002)(14454004)(790700001)(6116002)(3846002)(626008)(9686003)(99286004)(102836004)(6666004)(71190400001)(66066001)(68736007)(71200400001)(44832011)(478600001)(6436002)(86362001)(5640700003)(6306002)(54896002)(316002)(55016002)(52536014)(4744005)(5660300002)(66556008)(81166006)(66476007)(8936002)(26005)(8676002)(486006)(476003)(53936002)(6916009)(64756008)(66446008)(73956011)(6506007)(2351001)(3480700005)(2501003)(78486014)(74316002)(7696005)(25786009)(186003)(4743002)(256004)(81156014)(66946007)(26710200004)(60100200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BM1PR01MB3700; H:BM1PR01MB2563.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: webtechiezone.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: kZLLLJ6WIY4WTh+ffACXBrxJaFIb97XlgmVQ72xxldCNe4vE1s3bmcHoeFgHUF2gMvV+Ye/QikS90VHZAmqi3cRy+gP6O2AiLOy0kJ8zUnszOgadEn/RoV2LS4ADt6Nih30YTpExhSh1Qtl41i3hFtNhSQiKV5da4fi3Fofvw/yGPdA1xBkGRckHuvl6Vas844Dqye75joA5k/24RJXWTcF9yvPA4crsffOFaOPubT/YHfV5Fq0e2KinaBnxyeTZh6hBDo90As4q9+rrfwTgr6ZLWiwpTSCwqUJIiH2GZ8G4Mi3DW5wlq7vSI7rYixPz3kuKZdy1ObDpydWg2f1S1SXu/VVRGo93DvdfgR8L4oJNyqO/tFv8b0qeTloMTGPg7xACD26Kc2cds8uJdDH8KSwhJAyA9FOkCuPhYBB97n4= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: webtechiezone.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 98e3d2fc-3a99-4c76-957d-08d6d88fb71d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 May 2019 17:10:00.2045 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9ad75634-5c26-4a4f-8a2b-b7ad772adca5 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BM1PR01MB3700 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 08B99750B4 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=NETORGFT4690007.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-webtechiezone-com header.b=dNyMlZqg; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kathleen.brown@webtechiezone.com designates 40.107.139.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kathleen.brown@webtechiezone.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.68 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[NETORGFT4690007.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector1-webtechiezone-com]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[webtechiezone.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(0.10)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[NETORGFT4690007.onmicrosoft.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[webtechiezone-com.mail.protection.outlook.com,webtechiezone-com.mail.protection.outlook.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[78.139.107.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.779,0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; IP_SCORE(-0.99)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-2.69), asn: 8075(-2.21), country: US(-0.06)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:15:14 -0000 Hello, Hope you are doing well! I just wanted to know if you're looking to acquire Splunk Users Contact Lis= t for your marketing efforts. Information Field: Names, Title, Email, Phone, Company Name, Company URL, C= ompany physical address, SIC Code, Industry and Company Size (Revenue and E= mployee). Kindly review and let me know of your target interest so that I can get bac= k to you with the exact counts and sample file. Do let me know if you have any questions for me. Regards, Kathleen Brown Database Executive If you do not wish to receive these emails. Please respond Exit. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 15 18:07:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1967E159B37A for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA691683A9 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id g57so1041282edc.12 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:07:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-language :thread-index; bh=qDO4qeH+P7ojxUVEUUxu/jnn4Wv5mwqXcivHkKdmd1A=; b=E32X7tXCitByRR9g1CntqhLXcQO0VSy50jSTRKRlKbwUb+1rGMVPfHzZNDjIM64Fqh scAxVM/zRBnXSkm0oulZIiEAGEZhUoV/xZgSxyOuCt9QPcA3dmOjmvYEDTKciUKIL5vV xbYfaQEyav7I70sZXI3JSuDzN2zjWYz9vP6GC15D0DLharuNWrnim3j8jE2HePLCtFip OJzTmpdl5+h0xLe7C3PJQZ6rA2fAGPNo0NvuPB0kQXwsZ6fLqVfPHZcO+ea9Wsiak03X /Ttl4PfRqv0Ai4RhWG3SXGNn8YeYPZF1ry3+Aos/4MokUWbh9qeX9eHmT55b0WThySF+ W4dw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-language:thread-index; bh=qDO4qeH+P7ojxUVEUUxu/jnn4Wv5mwqXcivHkKdmd1A=; b=sDDD7xe04yhRVAnIlc+h4NO4G+tv2hIo39pSQ6yvdzMOG2590304uwbYztpgPpDiXH /Mzj0iH2R7cwgz2qTpPsVvtchYG9CzVQC4ojuGd5pnMFHz4z4j8L9X96gksBVN0CY5Sz AG/FbRyF1MsnrrVtBW4GvuG16aGSigOEUOIZvP7joL1L1g7/C64pBFXGkONcEMjL/85X NTdLBHgnNImFtWyULzoRxLEaGG7nh/mJlkoD+X1mHyoss9+gLsC1eikkLdhr/O5+Bv/Q 6zfMW01dNWdrr7Bz1tFb8B5KeV5JUkx/DrPT3+dA/vtOefeTRYwwiWLBl8w1md+SbpdG Y9sQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW05gxBX1jQL7CoK/pCWsXpbJcjKHSRfDMURxUiSe/iw0/lhIue ek07lq7WClA1Hza11ftUeQuifIixSmk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzPaxqqgoR18zdB2qmPT9dzhJqTOE9bl0Q9O+2+1PsrvQTAH3uoYEqK5tdM0WUtIPPXOCqZAQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d8d1:: with SMTP id k17mr45380195eds.250.1557943662291; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRIESPC (ptr-8shv4c9i5dqorgkabhz.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be. [2a02:1811:2500:a900:d4ac:e2ca:d5ec:dcb7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 43sm1077426edu.78.2019.05.15.11.07.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 May 2019 11:07:41 -0700 (PDT) From: To: Subject: DHCPv6 client in base Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 20:07:42 +0200 Message-ID: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: nl-be Thread-Index: AdULSH/W6+0q26lsSUytiHaAIUqrMw== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DA691683A9 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=E32X7tXC; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of driesmmichiels@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::531 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=driesmmichiels@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.68 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.946,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.73)[ip: (-9.10), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.20), asn: 15169(-2.26), country: US(-0.06)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:07:45 -0000 Hi net mailing list, Has anyone ever thought or considered integrating an IPv6 DHCP client in base? net/dhcp6 isn't really maintained anymore from the KAME days it works for basic functionality but fails when a more complex config is required. net/isc-dhcp44-client is a mess to configure and requires scripting for prefix delegations let alone a multiple prefix allocation. net/dhcpcd (NETBSD's native in base client btw) is a nice and configurable client for both IP stacks and kinda works. The kinda refers to some open reviews that are required before it is fully functional in FreeBSD. Other alternatives? Thoughts? From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 15 18:20:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5EA159C2AC for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (mx.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E15C6A682 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:58:65ff:fe00:b0b]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x4FIKS6J081273 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) (Client CN "/CN=mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=Let's+20Encrypt+20Authority+20X3"); Thu, 16 May 2019 03:20:38 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4FIKN5p070996 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 May 2019 03:20:23 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id x4FIKNOB070993; Thu, 16 May 2019 03:20:23 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 03:20:12 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190516.032012.517661495892269813.hrs@allbsd.org> To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCPv6 client in base From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> References: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_03_20_12_2019_951)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001:0:0:0:41]); Thu, 16 May 2019 03:20:47 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.4 required=13.0 tests=CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, QENCPTR1,RCVD_IN_AHBL,RCVD_IN_AHBL_PROXY,RCVD_IN_AHBL_SPAM,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.allbsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:20:58 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_03_20_12_2019_951)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit wrote in <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com>: dr> Has anyone ever thought or considered integrating an IPv6 DHCP client in dr> base? I have a plan to import wide-dhcp6 into the base system because it is simple enough. dr> net/dhcp6 isn't really maintained anymore from the KAME days it works for dr> basic functionality but fails when a more complex config is required. More specifics about the complex configuration? -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_03_20_12_2019_951)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEABECAAYFAlzcWFwACgkQTyzT2CeTzy0C1wCguf52HqXXIwJIjqDbOmmp3VDo LkkAoIXsWMfqbYl+Vp8uZmIILmb9HiDJ =1tOZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_03_20_12_2019_951)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 15 19:21:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A148159EC75 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFBD6D15C; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id j12so1374595eds.7; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=q5KHhZAXtpuXVt1EtGbetAiJc6+P86RpiLsR/q60m6M=; b=o3+qWKh7ap1xjCf3nX7PXIUC/eTaYxgbfWGzoh0Ov0yh/4onquq9n3gPuvXThiYn8G BNk1eDlSyhEs2XIXmKXs9QzRu21Y4KX6PeoU/1Z975mINVbB6aJUj0oEgj0xPVln+R/v XfSsOYAFkUW+9UMnADL6LYAAiRzzTKKfIzMUKU3vpgCn289Fd8vGbdf/D4hJWJFt2s9V aSGyx0ug55m4o0agHVhY+AlVOCuOaLRUjrjmkW1i9n/gfh6oCtCcAEeeviB0ZZo26RZ6 6fhGR29n//Pzjenx1ax75POt5PWzd/tgluxwioC2TFSyhPyhxcjEbi7SmE/uDCZO6vp2 N2Ww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=q5KHhZAXtpuXVt1EtGbetAiJc6+P86RpiLsR/q60m6M=; b=dcGXgZVvAJOdG/0j+RiJCbr5Q4fCpurxxJUeGR25X8Pez8XmULuipMGQEJRYd4nq43 qXwq031qkMjojI1JdFR3YWt3ebnU9cMMlsoddeggAFUnIk99PLM0+vnTkISFQcuDv3RZ LIKd+56a3ST09B+BLrt9V333OSD03/T1bTUGJsiDKtDASsaqMd03grJC7L3AsloFnpok B+h2CH2stZYVPiDCjHGpFX+CMHY0bGUSmUwjrX6a4prCv2lUpeMtnvV1Y8aEOkmK7/mU pR1RGjvwqGepEL9A9mQCz5LRHtUJN1skyUEsKXufydtqaC3e+cxHzA8zt06cVzRb/cam 2h9A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX0Yti1bZoWK5f3VSta5VYW+uyiv1DoIMBK+5H1NJ+wKcrT87Bk xQZKstUJv18qqIdD6cBagH7nS9E/bNs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxAgslCZHvBBbBcOWdWy8NYM9i8HknEb3oYcFoayoVdNlrYF8fpJt9HYdW74Yjb89iX3e/XgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6b18:: with SMTP id q24mr34881492ejr.225.1557948110095; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRIESPC (d8D874847.access.telenet.be. [141.135.72.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r18sm616251ejh.92.2019.05.15.12.21.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 May 2019 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) From: To: "'Hiroki Sato'" Cc: References: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> <20190516.032012.517661495892269813.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20190516.032012.517661495892269813.hrs@allbsd.org> Subject: RE: DHCPv6 client in base Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 21:21:50 +0200 Message-ID: <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: nl-be Thread-Index: AQLaN40i822Fq698RgLAgw7TO9S4zQG9t3h7pFRC3oA= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EAFBD6D15C X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.976,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 19:21:52 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org On > Behalf Of Hiroki Sato > Sent: woensdag 15 mei 2019 20:20 > To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: DHCPv6 client in base >=20 > wrote > in <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com>: >=20 > dr> Has anyone ever thought or considered integrating an IPv6 DHCP > dr> client in base? >=20 > I have a plan to import wide-dhcp6 into the base system because it is = simple > enough. Thats nice! Any timeline for this; 13.0 RELEASE? >=20 > dr> net/dhcp6 isn't really maintained anymore from the KAME days it > dr> works for basic functionality but fails when a more complex config = is > required. >=20 > More specifics about the complex configuration? My initial wording wasn't correct; wide-dhcp is in fact featureful = although buggy when config files get a bit bigger. Well I'm trying to assign a 64 prefix to two virtual interfaces and one = physical from a 56 delegation. For this config it errors out on parsing the config file ... while I'm = 99% certain there is not a problem in it. interface em0 { send rapid-commit; send ia-na 1; send ia-pd 1; }; id-assoc na 1 { }; id-assoc pd 1 { prefix ::/56 infinity; prefix-interface igb0 { sla-id 0; sla-len 8; }; prefix-interface lo1 { sla-id 1; sla-len 8; }; prefix-interface tun0 { sla-id 2; sla-len 8; }; }; May 15 21:20:50 May 15 21:20:50 vados dhcp6c[94383]: failed to parse = configuration file >=20 > -- Hiroki From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 15 19:43:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE596159FCEA for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (mx.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B5D6E457 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:58:65ff:fe00:b0b]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x4FJh7iR083494 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) (Client CN "/CN=mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=Let's+20Encrypt+20Authority+20X3"); Thu, 16 May 2019 04:43:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=allbsd.org; s=20190220; t=1557949414; bh=k/Usp9CQZZUSLRvZOBriygGlykl/woJ0I1qW/WQGHPU=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=bdOMGeQUx3U6kgLJO7PG5tIkOJ6sgxr32k2gsXYxwfA6ooa0KqoUg8/MOK9ubZy+F gYGs9EAYmyBdRJW5doh4ZtbHY//8tFp4/rQNJrqwrUqeL8BEVjN/8UT3HotYLZrpfy b332vEvn5yOylQQuhRFAJA79hnjRimuHpA6d6oOE= Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4FJh2FP072332 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 May 2019 04:43:02 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id x4FJh0b1072328; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:43:01 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 04:42:52 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190516.044252.1672818225777964175.hrs@allbsd.org> To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCPv6 client in base From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com> References: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> <20190516.032012.517661495892269813.hrs@allbsd.org> <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_04_42_52_2019_627)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001:0:0:0:41]); Thu, 16 May 2019 04:43:26 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=13.0 tests=CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, QENCPTR1, RCVD_IN_AHBL,RCVD_IN_AHBL_PROXY,RCVD_IN_AHBL_SPAM,RDNS_NONE, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.allbsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 19:43:41 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_04_42_52_2019_627)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit wrote in <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com>: dr> > I have a plan to import wide-dhcp6 into the base system because it is simple dr> > enough. dr> dr> Thats nice! Any timeline for this; 13.0 RELEASE? Yes, at the latest. I originally planned it before 12.0 but not happened for some non-technical reasons. dr> > More specifics about the complex configuration? dr> dr> My initial wording wasn't correct; wide-dhcp is in fact featureful although buggy when config files get a bit bigger. dr> Well I'm trying to assign a 64 prefix to two virtual interfaces and one physical from a 56 delegation. dr> For this config it errors out on parsing the config file ... while I'm 99% certain there is not a problem in it. dr> dr> interface em0 { dr> send rapid-commit; dr> send ia-na 1; dr> send ia-pd 1; dr> }; dr> dr> id-assoc na 1 { }; dr> dr> id-assoc pd 1 { dr> prefix ::/56 infinity; dr> prefix-interface igb0 { dr> sla-id 0; dr> sla-len 8; dr> }; dr> prefix-interface lo1 { dr> sla-id 1; dr> sla-len 8; dr> }; dr> prefix-interface tun0 { dr> sla-id 2; dr> sla-len 8; dr> }; dr> }; dr> dr> May 15 21:20:50 May 15 21:20:50 vados dhcp6c[94383]: failed to parse configuration file In this configuration dhcp6c does not work because lo1 has no L2 address to generate an interface ID which will be used with the /64 prefix. Is there any specific reason why you want to use a loopback interface? -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_04_42_52_2019_627)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEABECAAYFAlzca7wACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1sPQCgoE4pUN3kJ/L4777a2k0iZQpw N0kAn1TVwDiwddUIEfnwbSWMCCtEUQl0 =YUWe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_16_04_42_52_2019_627)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 15 19:52:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5546915A0358 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F176EC26 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id w11so1505639edl.5 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:52:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=biN72NYSVKpPOQjUDkxwi9gbl4KsMkbe4ERjlV5/gVk=; b=QhHUgSW4uWqNGmAI1Dl0ybNRQshS42KtLX8GTCB5FDB5+faMeiwI7xGWpUuGpm4HLs FNncxK7IwLd3jEe/4nOpKdttjRwVqFWXMJQTBLvWwA7Bj3WlN1+X5jYGOY50SFbKyje/ l5qbbiiJg6lZXCc4MeFVPDs2Tm/OhV3u7YFWOA6U4Ye9YdXOtEUSQ9ETW2n2bjwtSz4J Qnr4QnWdqaxfv0HSWCeOb9Lpfzz+7xblIG2N6V61rn+MdqUQmaVzDyZ1Ogh5kgreG7zs nsfe1CTeE0TOcwUahaubFchzZZB9hpuuuPxZovOlZf8iRtbri08a/Ez4jWGQklvZwdVD 52Gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=biN72NYSVKpPOQjUDkxwi9gbl4KsMkbe4ERjlV5/gVk=; b=KzaRI4rXNvyTrcc+RbIQv1HXa5o1dsriQeTxoWjrZxfNvukIeiEvAIwZQhkqVNlczd yCPQdcorUXuOu6CImnN+1hPRY1NmhmiDtLdeP9LylIbA8c3Vgdqv+0DZ9AJVBmE7XOoi RsmWAMhZCVOfDk0aBy0y6pzzz5Vk9PS8G5PAWcHKGTb0RC60tZ4CepPC4IfUXbYtVc82 MmIbMvCQ9ciRxEF/praKX7CCZd63VpqN0ge8YZIUcmnxArdE0AaZcqTlsUcNLvnS6o7c EgUiPBIvQ+oZinoO6qAcDJkS2ZMTrH8gh4NtM2BenXRj2H6W1gMr8nXMCqRleTSFG0gN fj2w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWGg90quHN46DbGMYzKrD9BKCWtTNrktmV1SX/ebaZNIAHcfWa7 nfyVIHxJ1cbLtdDC7Q4us2QMXpepjKs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuQu2c520BKk6M952zzdxMkZ99RHcWzFGivvkc8CtmR85VPc0llPg5lkJ9PAmWTNDBD3tBIw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3551:: with SMTP id s17mr34382930eja.19.1557949971835; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRIESPC (d8d874847.access.telenet.be. [141.135.72.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm1078290edg.81.2019.05.15.12.52.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 May 2019 12:52:50 -0700 (PDT) From: To: "'Hiroki Sato'" Cc: References: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> <20190516.032012.517661495892269813.hrs@allbsd.org> <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com> <20190516.044252.1672818225777964175.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20190516.044252.1672818225777964175.hrs@allbsd.org> Subject: RE: DHCPv6 client in base Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 21:52:52 +0200 Message-ID: <00aa01d50b57$c84ac020$58e04060$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: nl-be Thread-Index: AQLaN40i822Fq698RgLAgw7TO9S4zQG9t3h7Ai5ldU4BtRebP6Q1NN/Q X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C7F176EC26 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 19:52:54 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroki Sato > Sent: woensdag 15 mei 2019 21:43 > To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: DHCPv6 client in base >=20 > wrote > in <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com>: >=20 > dr> > I have a plan to import wide-dhcp6 into the base system because > dr> > it is simple enough. > dr> > dr> Thats nice! Any timeline for this; 13.0 RELEASE? >=20 > Yes, at the latest. I originally planned it before 12.0 but not = happened for > some non-technical reasons. >=20 > dr> > More specifics about the complex configuration? > dr> > dr> My initial wording wasn't correct; wide-dhcp is in fact featureful > although buggy when config files get a bit bigger. > dr> Well I'm trying to assign a 64 prefix to two virtual interfaces = and one > physical from a 56 delegation. > dr> For this config it errors out on parsing the config file ... while = I'm 99% > certain there is not a problem in it. > dr> > dr> interface em0 { > dr> send rapid-commit; > dr> send ia-na 1; > dr> send ia-pd 1; > dr> }; > dr> > dr> id-assoc na 1 { }; > dr> > dr> id-assoc pd 1 { > dr> prefix ::/56 infinity; > dr> prefix-interface igb0 { > dr> sla-id 0; > dr> sla-len 8; > dr> }; > dr> prefix-interface lo1 { > dr> sla-id 1; > dr> sla-len 8; > dr> }; > dr> prefix-interface tun0 { > dr> sla-id 2; > dr> sla-len 8; > dr> }; > dr> }; > dr> > dr> May 15 21:20:50 May 15 21:20:50 vados dhcp6c[94383]: failed to = parse > dr> configuration file >=20 > In this configuration dhcp6c does not work because lo1 has no L2 = address > to generate an interface ID which will be used with the /64 prefix. = Is there > any specific reason why you want to use a loopback interface? I was planning to use the prefix on lo1 as the ext_if argument in an = IPFW NPTv6 rule. That would translate my private jail addresses to their corresponding = global ones from the prefix. I know its possible with VIMAGE to just run rtadvd on a bridge but I = rather stay away from that, one rule in IPFW is all I need. >=20 > -- Hiroki From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 15 19:53:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C04915A03DD for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864086ED0A for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from driesm.michiels@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id w11so1509348edl.5 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:53:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=/yfKUT7RXHHUKL9bKWH6Ll1nBR0UoNnazcoNlHfdP8c=; b=Ea+Nkz7KwQbxUxNVypftSClJlOXJg/cKUQ328xc2gr2Uaq1SMWD1ffK5NCX49/rC16 KIW4774sXSr23K0nybDPOcIdEEZmB7jcZyoXwyqdSzciBRreR3SU8KkKf7l4WFuWrdsU U2m6cc91kV+zCIqDakSIrYFSf1MUu5b9otjD92qOqK7HPSFvpOYZqhjExrQOZfeAJyU0 qthWmNQe5a0gNrHdJGJO+OO3Nd4lKUlSFNV6D5elVTt2He1WBKHIrvOZZeLL1pY23EXf RGU6boYo20NWSlBT+DhG+FGgxFcnAJiK56YXTDhwKSQS+7z2St2RGvtqWPJ0j0VWF7Kw u8Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=/yfKUT7RXHHUKL9bKWH6Ll1nBR0UoNnazcoNlHfdP8c=; b=QGbeeN3+d77Q5Ht4TDxifw6NESPbergJah5MZpG3OZMkSAZUPtAhJNDLcbmYlMN2he iABhIhI0pAjTkeJ4fhqBW8rjXugOjSjB2lLtzuQFIzGTrm1Mp6eQZMBJsa1259Ct0rt+ 1CGvpDx5ODh5Pe1abiRsh7LyFWSweJlcSgmeJEtXCWmhVkQPqjZf59ZybUMS4Ly1icuq RHQfMbWMtvG4Mj82redNahl3javzdUXYYFVYTWq6HofCNPtekrrLlnAC/23zSCXgLK2E iEGalg83GAGvDDarLno0NXJHjIigNNY89pK9wkbiSD0Fz4NCtsovblHGF4c1mxgHBDVY q32w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAnbULBuUqjrS8C/aeVMpf1FIwBo4n4VIE0fgyFDz7LnVmhdpH dSuFhDwegDs1uhcTxm2UVfFHaDR4/8s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQ6dfpwGwBCbr7BGlNERJ2Ro0LhAzcauuF6Cu1asueZ/shFcEmfs+Hb93+OYCW+8qq7NEawQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b20f:: with SMTP id p15mr23723571ejz.63.1557950034925; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRIESPC (d8D874847.access.telenet.be. [141.135.72.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d28sm630170ejl.83.2019.05.15.12.53.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 May 2019 12:53:54 -0700 (PDT) From: To: "'Hiroki Sato'" Cc: References: <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com> <20190516.032012.517661495892269813.hrs@allbsd.org> <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com> <20190516.044252.1672818225777964175.hrs@allbsd.org> <00aa01d50b57$c84ac020$58e04060$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00aa01d50b57$c84ac020$58e04060$@gmail.com> Subject: RE: DHCPv6 client in base Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 21:53:55 +0200 Message-ID: <00b101d50b57$edf75f90$c9e61eb0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: nl-be Thread-Index: AQLaN40i822Fq698RgLAgw7TO9S4zQG9t3h7Ai5ldU4BtRebPwJCxfmvpCMgt7A= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 864086ED0A X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ea+Nkz7K; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of driesmmichiels@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::531 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=driesmmichiels@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.73 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.73)[ip: (-9.10), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.20), asn: 15169(-2.26), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 19:53:58 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: driesm.michiels@gmail.com > Sent: woensdag 15 mei 2019 21:53 > To: 'Hiroki Sato' > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: DHCPv6 client in base >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hiroki Sato > > Sent: woensdag 15 mei 2019 21:43 > > To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com > > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: DHCPv6 client in base > > > > wrote > > in <006001d50b53$72a22e00$57e68a00$@gmail.com>: > > > > dr> > I have a plan to import wide-dhcp6 into the base system = because > > dr> > it is simple enough. > > dr> > > dr> Thats nice! Any timeline for this; 13.0 RELEASE? > > > > Yes, at the latest. I originally planned it before 12.0 but not > > happened for some non-technical reasons. > > > > dr> > More specifics about the complex configuration? > > dr> > > dr> My initial wording wasn't correct; wide-dhcp is in fact = featureful > > although buggy when config files get a bit bigger. > > dr> Well I'm trying to assign a 64 prefix to two virtual interfaces > > dr> and one > > physical from a 56 delegation. > > dr> For this config it errors out on parsing the config file ... = while > > dr> I'm 99% > > certain there is not a problem in it. > > dr> > > dr> interface em0 { > > dr> send rapid-commit; > > dr> send ia-na 1; > > dr> send ia-pd 1; > > dr> }; > > dr> > > dr> id-assoc na 1 { }; > > dr> > > dr> id-assoc pd 1 { > > dr> prefix ::/56 infinity; > > dr> prefix-interface igb0 { > > dr> sla-id 0; > > dr> sla-len 8; > > dr> }; > > dr> prefix-interface lo1 { > > dr> sla-id 1; > > dr> sla-len 8; > > dr> }; > > dr> prefix-interface tun0 { > > dr> sla-id 2; > > dr> sla-len 8; > > dr> }; > > dr> }; > > dr> > > dr> May 15 21:20:50 May 15 21:20:50 vados dhcp6c[94383]: failed to > > dr> parse configuration file > > > > In this configuration dhcp6c does not work because lo1 has no L2 > > address to generate an interface ID which will be used with the /64 > > prefix. Is there any specific reason why you want to use a loopback > interface? >=20 > I was planning to use the prefix on lo1 as the ext_if argument in an = IPFW > NPTv6 rule. > That would translate my private jail addresses to their corresponding = global > ones from the prefix. > I know its possible with VIMAGE to just run rtadvd on a bridge but I = rather > stay away from that, one rule in IPFW is all I need. Was planning a similar setup for my OpenVPN clients on the tun0 = interface. >=20 > > > > -- Hiroki From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 16 12:01:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6068E15932CC for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B7272438 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C674315932BD; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B538415932BB for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5484172426 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69CF5E68B for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4GC1XMU041995 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4GC1Xv1041986 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237921] wpi: Memory leak in function wpi_free_tx_ring of sys/dev/wpi/if_wpi.c Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords flagtypes.name short_desc assigned_to cc bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:01:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237921 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-qa Flags| |mfc-stable11?, | |mfc-stable12? Summary|Memory leak in function |wpi: Memory leak in |wpi_free_tx_ring of |function wpi_free_tx_ring |sys/dev/wpi/if_wpi.c |of sys/dev/wpi/if_wpi.c Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org CC| |adrian@freebsd.org, | |avos@freebsd.org, | |benjsc@FreeBSD.org, | |net@FreeBSD.org, | |wireless@FreeBSD.org Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak --- Thank you for your quality report. Could you please include your proposed p= atch an attachment please? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 16 12:06:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FF81593D7C for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59D772A29 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 75B2D1593D78; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6468C1593D77 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2D5072A21 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C67BE7D1 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4GC6lEH005927 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4GC6lO7005923 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237921] wpi: Memory leak in function wpi_free_tx_ring of sys/dev/wpi/if_wpi.c Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: yangx92@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:06:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237921 --- Comment #2 from Young --- Created attachment 204398 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D204398&action= =3Dedit Proposed patch --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 16 12:57:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB021595788 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AE3749FD for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3ED021595787; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6E61595786 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC29749F6 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143BFEEFA for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4GCvqhR054684 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4GCvqVw054683 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204568] gif(4) interface remembers configuration after being destroyed Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: arrowd@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not Enough Information X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 12:57:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204568 Gleb Popov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arrowd@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Not Enough Information --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 16 13:01:12 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74331595AE3 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4005474EC1 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 040D81595AE1; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D251595AE0 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A74974EBA for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10D1EF2C for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4GD1A5S062546 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x4GD1AY1062545 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204568] gif(4) interface remembers configuration after being destroyed Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Feedback Timeout X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:01:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204568 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|Not Enough Information |Feedback Timeout --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 17 08:58:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C312F158E7D7 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 08:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@debilux.org) Received: from mail.dblx.io (mail.dblx.io [IPv6:2a01:4f8:161:10c7::13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785B86ACE0 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 08:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@debilux.org) Received: from leia.lan.dblx.io (port-92-192-198-26.dynamic.qsc.de [92.192.198.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dblx.io (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD8F84E44; Fri, 17 May 2019 10:58:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Baer Message-Id: <409EF41B-FB07-4735-8405-01657C9797D9@debilux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) Subject: Re: VLANs for use with jails Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 10:58:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: Cc: Artem Viklenko via freebsd-net To: "Patrick M. Hausen" References: <2BE6B69D-FB37-49BA-AAA1-67531A4BE064@debilux.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 785B86ACE0 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of chris@debilux.org designates 2a01:4f8:161:10c7::13 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=chris@debilux.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.52 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.dblx.io]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.931,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[26.198.192.92.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[punkt.de.multi.uribl.com,christianbaer.me.multi.uribl.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[debilux.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.78)[ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.10), asn: 24940(-1.80), country: DE(-0.01)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:58:56 -0000 Hi, i still can=E2=80=99t get it to work. My rc.conf looks like this: defaultrouter=3D"10.0.3.1" ifconfig_igb0=3D"inet 10.0.3.11/24 -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 = -lro -tso -vlanhwtso" ifconfig_igb1=3D"up -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -lro -tso = -vlanhwtso" cloned_interfaces=3D"vlan30 vlan40 vlan50 vlan60" ifconfig_vlan30=3D"inet 10.0.3.12/24 vlan 30 vlandev igb1 description = LAN" ifconfig_vlan40=3D"inet 10.0.4.12/24 vlan 40 vlandev igb1 description = IoT" ifconfig_vlan50=3D"inet 10.0.5.12/24 vlan 50 vlandev igb1 description = Guest" ifconfig_vlan60=3D"inet 10.0.6.12/24 vlan 60 vlandev igb1 description = VOIP=E2=80=9C ifconfig says: # ifconfig igb0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 = options=3D8100b8 ether ac:1f:6b:63:37:b0 inet 10.0.3.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.3.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 igb1: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 = options=3D8100b8 ether ac:1f:6b:63:37:b1 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D680003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 groups: lo nd6 options=3D21 vlan30: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 1500 description: LAN ether ac:1f:6b:63:37:b1 inet 10.0.3.12 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.3.255 groups: vlan vlan: 30 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb1 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 vlan40: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 1500 description: IoT ether ac:1f:6b:63:37:b1 inet 10.0.4.12 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.4.255 groups: vlan vlan: 40 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb1 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 vlan50: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 1500 description: Guest ether ac:1f:6b:63:37:b1 inet 10.0.5.12 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.5.255 groups: vlan vlan: 50 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb1 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 vlan60: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 1500 description: VOIP ether ac:1f:6b:63:37:b1 inet 10.0.6.12 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.6.255 groups: vlan vlan: 60 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb1 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D29 When I try to bring up a jail on a freshly installed iocage it quits = with an error. # iocage create -n "vlantest" -r LATEST defaultrouter=3D"10.0.6.1" = vnet=3D"on" allow_raw_sockets=3D"1" boot=3D"on" = interfaces=3D"vnet0:vlan60" ip4_addr=3D"vnet0|10.0.6.13/24" vlantest successfully created! * Starting vlantest + Started OK + Using devfs_ruleset: 5 + Configuring VNET FAILED ifconfig: BRDGADD vnet0.5: Invalid argument Stopped vlantest due to VNET failure What am I doning wrong?=20 Best regards, Chris --=20 E-Mail: chris@debilux.org Web: https://christianbaer.me > Am 14.05.2019 um 09:01 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen : >=20 > Hi! >=20 > Not tested, minor typos possible ... >=20 >> Am 10.05.2019 um 23:02 schrieb Christian Baer : >> ifconfig_igb1=3D"inet 10.0.3.12/24 -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 = -lro -tso -vlanhwtso" >> ifconfig_igb1_ipv6=3D"inet6 accept_rtadv -lro -tso=E2=80=9C=20 >> [...] >> What's the proper way to set up igb1 to be untagged (and so be in the = management vlan) and create the different VLANs on it and use it with = the jails? On of the VLANs should also be in the management VLAN (to = move my Unifi controller from a Pi to a jail). >=20 > ifconfig_igb1=3D=E2=80=9Cup -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -lro = -tso -vlanhwtso=E2=80=9C > cloned_interfaces=3D"vlan3 vlan4=E2=80=9C >=20 > ifconfig_vlan3=3D"inet 10.0.3.12/24 vlan 3 vlandev igb1=E2=80=9C > ifconfig_vlan4=3D"inet 10.0.4.12/24 vlan 4 vlandev igb1=E2=80=9C >=20 > iocage set vlan3jail interfaces=3D"vnet0:vlan3" > iocage set vlan3jail ip4_addr=3D"vnet0|10.0.3.13/24" >=20 > iocage set vlan4jail interfaces=3D"vnet0:vlan4" > iocage set vlan4jail ip4_addr=3D"vnet0|10.0.4.13/24" >=20 > HTH, > Patrick > --=20 > punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung > Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 > 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de > AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling >=20 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 17 09:06:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8B7158EEFB for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D995E6B24A for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate2.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id x4H9603V039054; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:06:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.29.44.36] ([217.29.44.36]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id x4H960Fv049404; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:06:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) Subject: Re: VLANs for use with jails From: "Patrick M. Hausen" In-Reply-To: <409EF41B-FB07-4735-8405-01657C9797D9@debilux.org> Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:05:58 +0200 Cc: Artem Viklenko via freebsd-net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2BE6B69D-FB37-49BA-AAA1-67531A4BE064@debilux.org> <409EF41B-FB07-4735-8405-01657C9797D9@debilux.org> To: Christian Baer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D995E6B24A X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hausen@punkt.de designates 217.29.33.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hausen@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.990,0]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[punkt.de.multi.uribl.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.29.32.0/20]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailin.pluspunkthosting.de,mailin.pluspunkthosting.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[131.33.29.217.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.51)[-0.510,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.21)[ipnet: 217.29.32.0/20(-0.59), asn: 16188(-0.47), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 09:06:15 -0000 Hi! > Am 17.05.2019 um 10:58 schrieb Christian Baer : >=20 > Hi, > i still can=E2=80=99t get it to work. Two problems that I see: > ifconfig_igb0=3D"inet 10.0.3.11/24 -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 = -lro -tso -vlanhwtso" > ifconfig_vlan30=3D"inet 10.0.3.12/24 vlan 30 vlandev igb1 description = LAN=E2=80=9C One does not simply use addresses in the same broadcast domain on two = interfaces. > # iocage create -n "vlantest" -r LATEST defaultrouter=3D"10.0.6.1" = vnet=3D"on" allow_raw_sockets=3D"1" boot=3D"on" = interfaces=3D"vnet0:vlan60" ip4_addr=3D"vnet0|10.0.6.13/24" >=20 > vlantest successfully created! > * Starting vlantest > + Started OK > + Using devfs_ruleset: 5 > + Configuring VNET FAILED Did you compile a custom kernel? This is mandatory to use VNET at least = on RELENG_11. Not sure about RELENG_12 and I=E2=80=99m quite busy now. Sorry - please = check yourself. Kind regards, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 18 17:31:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13F41593386 for ; Sat, 18 May 2019 17:31:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert@heron.pl) Received: from sys.heron.com.pl (sys.heron.com.pl [89.25.217.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CAC8A745 for ; Sat, 18 May 2019 17:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert@heron.pl) Received: from [79.189.180.154] (helo=[192.168.0.230]) by sys.heron.com.pl with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hS3BL-000PnY-MC for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 19:31:39 +0200 From: Robert Heron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: FreeBSD Port: mpd5-5.8_10 - only one client behind NAT can work simultaneously Message-Id: <6B8DCAC2-803F-4247-89B1-7D071104630E@heron.pl> Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 19:31:38 +0200 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 90CAC8A745 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of robert@heron.pl designates 89.25.217.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robert@heron.pl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.77)[-0.769,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:89.25.217.128/28]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[heron.pl]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.995,0]; IP_SCORE(0.08)[asn: 31242(0.34), country: PL(0.06)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.heron.pl]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.33)[0.329,0]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:31242, ipnet:89.25.128.0/17, country:PL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 17:31:42 -0000 Hello, I use mpd5 from ports on FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p10 amd64 and there is one = serious problem I can=E2=80=99t solve: when connecting clients from = behind NAT (with the same public IP) to an mpd5 box, every new = established connection causes the previous one (from the same source IP) = to go dead. Any IP traffic is stopped through the previous connection = but its ng interface still exists. This happens regardless of used = cryptography. I=E2=80=99ve tried both PPTP and L2TP over IPSec PSK = (with racoon). When one client connects, it works OK. When any second = one from the same public IP connects, then previous IP traffic dies. My = firewall is open. I=E2=80=99ve searched the net, but found no clue :( -- Robert From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 18 20:10:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232001596F91 for ; Sat, 18 May 2019 20:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "eg.sd.rdtc.ru", Issuer "eg.sd.rdtc.ru" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049EB8EF67 for ; Sat, 18 May 2019 20:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4IKATHM033919 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 19 May 2019 03:10:30 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: mpd5-5.8_10 - only one client behind NAT can work simultaneously To: Robert Heron , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <6B8DCAC2-803F-4247-89B1-7D071104630E@heron.pl> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <0fe5932b-f15b-091b-705b-26af29de0f35@grosbein.net> Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 03:10:25 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6B8DCAC2-803F-4247-89B1-7D071104630E@heron.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 049EB8EF67 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.71)[-0.713,0]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.41)[0.407,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.980,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: RU(0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29072, ipnet:2a03:3100::/32, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 20:10:52 -0000 19.05.2019 0:31, Robert Heron wrote: > I use mpd5 from ports on FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p10 amd64 and there is one serious problem I can’t solve: when connecting clients from behind NAT (with the same public IP) to an mpd5 box, every new established connection causes the previous one (from the same source IP) to go dead. Any IP traffic is stopped through the previous connection but its ng interface still exists. This happens regardless of used cryptography. I’ve tried both PPTP and L2TP over IPSec PSK (with racoon). When one client connects, it works OK. When any second one from the same public IP connects, then previous IP traffic dies. My firewall is open. > I’ve searched the net, but found no clue :( If you use PPtP and no IPSEC, then you use PPtPGRE - that is, modified version of GRE protocol. Your NAT box must support multiple PPtPGRE connections for this to work. If you use another FreeBSD as NAT box, it has support for multiple PPtP connections by means of ipfw nat if you load alias_pptp.ko kernel module. If your NAT box has no support for aliasing multiple PPtP clients, you are out of luck and need to change NAT box or switch to another protocol. As for L2TP without IPSEC, you can use PPP/MPPE inside L2TP to encapsulate VPN into UDP stream and then it will pass through any NAT box without extra protocol support. I do not know if it is possible to run multiple L2IP/IPSEC clients behind same NAT box. Anyway, this is all not problem of mpd5 but of NAT box or IPSEC.