From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 05:00:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E9215BD2EE for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 05:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B178884D for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 05:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 676EE15BD2EC; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 05:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551E615BD2EB for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 05:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3F88884C for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (chombo [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:ae1f:6bff:fe6b:9e1c]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17ED738D16; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 22:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:4ccd:e2dc:ca4e:21ef] (unknown [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:4ccd:e2dc:ca4e:21ef]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FA941CB7; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 22:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: How to best check a configuration of another port/package? To: Adam Weinberger , Gerald Pfeifer Cc: FreeBSD Ports References: From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <736af897-818e-68cd-c354-f295d03fb176@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 22:00:11 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DD3F88884C X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 05:00:21 -0000 On 2019-06-08 9:57, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 10:02 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> >> In https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237688 we had >> a user report against lang/gcc* ports that could be traced back to >> a certain functionality (option) in another port (devel/binutils) >> missing. >> >> In pseudo-code this could be addressed as follows in lang/gcc* >> >> .if $(binutils built statically) >> IGNORE= GCC requires dynamically linked binutils >> .endif >> >> Now the question is: How to implement something like this practically? > > What you have there won't work, because `make index` won't work, plus > Makefiles shouldn't be doing external calls if they don't have to. > You'll also have a problem whereby LOCALBASE isn't defined yet, and I > don't believe that IGNORE after bsd.port.pre.mk will work (I could be > wrong about that). > > You have two options: > 1) Turn it into a pre-configure, which is slightly ugly for the > end-user but still gets the job done > pre-configure: > if some file in binutils is static; then echo "NOPE"; exit 1; fi > > 2) (The correct way to do it) Create a binutils-static slave port, > remove the static option from binutils proper, and depend specifically > on the non-static port. Why is a slave port the correct option here instead of flavouring binutils? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 11:52:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B593215C566E for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 11:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ADE76DC5D for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 11:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: matthew/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A105EBDF7 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 11:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:100d:3f0b:ca06:ddf]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EC2FA29 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 11:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/6EC2FA29; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190608192918.5533b9c7@raksha.tavi.co.uk> From: Matthew Seaman Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=matthew@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFJIL80BEADi7/VbnnErDU6pjEhI/SzEZ/HbDRkJ5g7HroAtqIRm6nj8ZwOAgZ/2ZnWn 5F+fXTuLsG0FLNtkd17FoVcuCi5e/GPliXI5cmamV7E1Yz4T8UsJ7RQolimyxVexccKd16Tc AA7B9bFlJSKkBUSD0buj7VjT07xWhRzu6Vgi5r0UjLALYJz977uZA0F1aOGOXREDEAOhdcNc kSNjynqAwDA6dCT1Elpi4key1fYjv4jyDF+GU/YXul2Y/rguA8FCkHd9vyym5eAsLQ5mG00V V9fkEHIpH5KorNVnl/ufHXnkZqmHAZVpFDcrshb7aZ/pL45PXyWgLj+e6etelgj3a2bZi0JF cVdXCnBZVP2oIyYblM11ugTbfCwodORU8a5KfPeztMdAtDr4e+32NTrPdPi5rLT+GUsYz+PL 3A3m3u8bdsFp40DlIrBtSByVjqERxcfhphrEB4J8BXHUG7OAtXkZMlW/PGKDwXJq0O6Z5Tcg YHAoEiSWbXiexHgXNJyP+sqnIlhLWhSJGeJ+C83wqI6oYlZUCW00NkPxcIHnQPV/z+5wQVci TMyaWC2YCIHz4Ljs+TnwWMz0E8PNFDfHVbQ0W4PRGV7gRAqxfL+yKufauIEGbEq8rNDbSwL3 bcUCxR4ZDlaUEUwT4J8naf7rjdgiEYHs2Ig3jeK1+ER4FPG1sQARAQABtDBNYXR0aGV3IFNl YW1hbiA8bS5zZWFtYW5AaW5mcmFjYW5pbm9waGlsZS5jby51az6JAlcEEwEKAEECGwMFCwkI BwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4ACGQEWIQRyz6whebywJLW1RZADb2ye5/OevwUCWttU4QUJ DFmAlAAKCRADb2ye5/Oevwb5EACipbOazgwl5IbqkQI4gELpCh5dqDASS9DQqAD35n/cI91P 0lrYcdyCQbOXadQi5bswnP4AcJqX83mITXbcApDdxVxHujw7VODI069eV3/I9Qz72mHYYAAj w0CHNx4bKED2YCSVS6+jV5hq2sywNEUxL+4I218Oc+IsLts62m4tQ8UxX9fQ2H1kQOvdrYpj x7je5qJX/yujLc+9WWZ8ZBSdP/HVJUEdRgQotwAlgfMp3mRQEE73MAJisG/olj/dSxd+oHIP NbJt1yxMqhZekuEGqZpm3tWvqYgpGcEXdhphJSxeK6oLpTLghuAb7/WdOBrpfL7c2OQYBgOw DK+7Io9NBt/d/rCxL39jmUONW8ohrhnNQ2SALnyYTvZgruxA4tXxOOyM9up0/8mB5E8YC9ML 5YuxRPNTXYeWCexa0zktnkCgT7PhS33evf5gsA0B9Snv7TFCFN9adPAdHlsppZIWfTHDG8e2 Jik8PmvsUG34XNif5k6Ui3++2ZA8ZoKvOyLeomuno1hN8yk1APw8SbX1SPNz9UVbl8W/YgGj 3GhYOuQt4HcMiLyTby6R4lC4nsBaHS1MX+57f6Zxzf2wNjSKxiJK9qS7azbu/GxpafNhbz1Z +iUDIaJkRWA1Gs8C7SMcfVsI5zDtvqHGYtTCgooVMYJ6vRyB68M4bljUYMxRTrkCDQRSUUGj ARAAsPHwcnupWuOqYbboiYwZnd6dNRSUzMxIXN8vkdkrDfw7DvV9WYuAC9IGJ310N0otfh9A zGDiCPRbKl0YayJ2BIgsFzyAavA/kCCRLP5hMZ1mKkZ4K8Fs16EvtmarzPibSBfDQ0wcwzNf nSL2gZVG1JwRHHZ9TtiUsuAIh0R/qRh9+8AcFkS5Pfxb1PzJC/YuWOdlj6cO58u+2FfmNiGm oB6kl1LahmbtGgO8GRInkOYUYlWSUAA4Flw4FzWHBkEGv/STAp++KAZu2Tdl5UZH9iXm+Hsf 4sqt+/ILJketmO2RK2o2ECVwE2a/hQdOjjqmcscd1M5znweKSCk6dR/K4Cv05bZ7KVRCm2vK vuEBpltm/43/ls7OnFwz1UVswX9ch9t5tgSwbGxtTWJ/Mr3ybCz0EE4WaJBI8HTuVZWaJwXM ozz26BZCOV56flkZjDuyRhvRjZG+QhdbbumBDpa6wu3MCjSG8wn4RlNjuQdjDCo6bdqyovGg f8RW6UNCmStZkpTZYZfs8MTEcltmaFiJQjnY39pWa+Fp0aWwcwOVlAkp2wX6FzQeIEbPW515 vAlCjXneJIN7jss4Y2QJtFFQaCw0c+NloESFFhCLvYBhMPf2kccnDu25VRupkLp6njQs94Nf jtSb8mzOa2EhAHY81pRfdetOPosi23P6zIGKLXkAEQEAAYkEuwQYAQoAJgIbAhYhBHLPrCF5 vLAktbVFkANvbJ7n856/BQJa21VJBQkMUG8mAonBvSAEGQEKAGYFAlJRQaNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1M0E2OEI5 MTNBNEU2Q0YzRTFFMTMyNkJCMjNBRjUxOEUxQTQwMTMACgkQuyOvUY4aQBNlUBAAlCLRtOug Y70Q3lkGsFSNJZm9oqPJGorOsH+emDdsiZSe5Ut5P2MG+XlIofQOfxvupltzw2pFuJOvHEMS 0rod6lLJ6joInhf0ZQH3P6jF/d2Y8iR9+2nqBtUf27OsHVLRMd/5WHVgyMjjyNBq0urIdv4E wV8Y9CDtGBGeiYyMstaBxHdEH+oM9VZB92lv485p4V8t8k1BgNn7UjQzOMBlITAB7WsUcXGi zTjMMe1tX/IT+f00I4PWAn3w5q8ldvtsWf+muVpIaGpZBMrxBEPxYBD3WGMxiymthQQxgZAB 03GatfLjzixld5Zn8WuGiPOxOTBkJAudhxPvfkO+3jgLGSa7TN46HgNH36OdeEr4SMdspR0i 0lmW1hwHmpmyw3XYLy4BwmhuV9z1XQN3qab8FBxOpxcCxnbO4HoDgXAahQbRNSA7umzz+I7S UcZVnCCG3hCG4BLxklZhBw4RmUtRHiL8vu+MPKrcBnbZ8uJ2s3E6mhB0yM0UnA3pYhAysgwB q3n9jLYN0atzVmHL8Fxjyc7z1EJPgqFdfHfMYl/eLYmCuGNfMsSGlH9O7tWoE10qkDlLmNB7 jbiJNgTf9rc50QKKUqumqp4a1UMEnt+7yf//JqUD7Jf0iJrglLgUyPKSY5te9rJqHPy1wIXT 6pChY5ic8jmtXKsCZaaxL8rEsq0JEANvbJ7n856/RNkQAKiZK5wNuRyNJS21MUJxnP7biEW4 1QuGhV/7Ryw5XXIor8H7SZHCnVR1fCYnJWRwRYn0SyZGoERW/57rgibf8/gkPw741AkCKOhL TDNgvNriEjfWj3I0X6M90AZXhcnGVJTS/moV65g4lUo6jX1GiJyTCD4b9SLyNDzPgiWO2I3W R+Xf/W81PK1820CN7HpIZUrLfGF+Nr6kXUxeOeSpi7ZMB/p3e7ZSzY0Lp7PFqGfL9N1Jg26X 8DVaf/Em0AorutLx84DqqMfO02ySaCq0B83VYzbNB3Ascy4c2JNIvwMiyUbsOEzDKkqB3sYb 0iJtnty9DKvMaLps00eM1+GcYpLsspY4NZQeJTVC+WetRqzFM4k2JH1q3hwymYgIsxDam6kn U3m0bN19WLQYmS5HLPZbkmtpm3P49g6KLFxZHzklS7x8VUOMJ3O97xXScBC9bePB3tqQRDSs wX3YmIywTYVInEeFleNaXH3UoS3Dhw7KP3i/BNreWDM+oZhbc2OkgWzQzXfT+l17EcP9/xML 0CIgM/cJPwMOrKrdqgfL6zAYDUK0IGFgRoxgnAbnpPHCr7ykrELNLbGtnzchzCxnbIyrSVAb m+Dm5MnjQRiNFXbuvpkuVVFqo6a0OhX1cwTuCIzSEfSggRaOOEqXTk559dDOXDqVx9lVKniK vbGzkmhAuQINBFJRQiABEADC0axEKC09VCYGgsH20lUwtAXd6VUVCNENBlW+MXQYsKfCLqO+ XP6vM0pA+sSswaBeSB/Eu3XgdKhuYGKHqAOo4wyKvwk3h9IWmgVNMM8ZQFi/PP2ya56/tuWZ 7kkG2M2OfWQpnBHa97wSN0KWDjZHrQXQMggDq5EqimNc2+hFaB2zIGrP0tjXVrHLJEmJRLq2 ugTxpGKLlNOtBNEsWmiN+MafXpKM6HLDq1scCvrhRICheBsnGtcyGaErwpjNaLA70I0+B552 DfTj+PICOGCMnp4jlP6rmVG7RifZoE5DrkcdTim/IU0pLaO/Epts5lwDodEOW9CKQFH8dswT bp6xhKJf+y1dIwhoOIkEUspoME3rgLtn72+QQW4jw/4pjA7MQu9VOF9bUN/nxTfyn/Rct3Bq sBZPJURdorewPgoBsPxMaA7t8JRoRyuVwXGMacw+wdmv2lldsdUOGokSCB596FoXAcKWndiY dgNjMWJaODy2va9Vlv65hGQRXWcoI2ytMCSwSzslly+V+0jo0ZWoUpd+6BuYRvG1QUW5/Fco aPPJsr/UfU0jzg6bCAw/xw1nuGaiZTqNiNjklrGIKyi0UyY28DGGADn3j9obY7pOrI9nFicc NtxURyhmgHP9tiTYNTVaGPyJh+WV3ZH/Yb7TStZadLoWb5vXAs0DQj+qnQARAQABiQI8BBgB CgAmAhsMFiEEcs+sIXm8sCS1tUWQA29snufznr8FAlrbVUkFCQxQbqkACgkQA29snufznr9M zBAAvn4C8wWYyiObQbqgaAm8GjqlSi0lGEv7ydmcu2ElAAyD0dnxbEMKEGgBpQumGD8/1pdZ FYw3EIKWiazpvMVw+6fFz9GZdviuM1refUYm3duDejaNoH75zmIG9LRTOJ6RBkPd3oQznT40 X5K+ARqLaJDPAzjb6DH7HYINlvNvf89M4CVN0gofv7dcCqtBTF8CtXB3iG0cFAis/12PwpfH 3YzWq529jnJJCLChTD5eEBi2JNLzQRHMeqy8D4Bnkb+Ahkwgbzs5GXGYaXoZeyFKThTAK/sg eJ9Cz15azfKW+EWMUOcvCurqz2QajlLe04N9mU4vPp92VTo274CtfIg/shSguYXnEZ0I/sz3 VFn3Kn2bRYeRu6PyusNUsQ397Uw5wDVmqzQqz+MnOkP6xAJjOvnD05cdj17G4rJ8gTgmzDSA 6v0AfzhUygy6Qf0UgrWrFaFIL4zQWsp9sap/QTMm92SBhLOE/Kc7nkkueEeVp0TtbkWByxLq 77Gbp0m4iZB8zylaac118hY+/vJ87aTuKF4CiCcezaI5FMg8/VVczO7/LV/n8Uu8QUOYEatR cfOB2JNXxpI/LqXVzvXpUidJbwpXY2aZprgzGhahBocuRL9jY8qp4in5CkhyU+rZyHkpQMHI +i45KRHO5GDSDMQcDF2LYGRbDUMg7G1MYTJwzsG5Ag0EUkgvzQEQANi5h27KsPhVw6AKlUo8 htPapW7b4RS26/z2pJe1IJ+lejrD5LveuRxdO3V+5hxqdBMEYNuQRmOlgsjiXkM5XFIgBeEF VGBaDv5yKPZXNfqIJC2nNehcR+rWHq84yrVb/MAvEvfQTvn3GeCTDd51xYnZYVO0An44TLLe 9cKL/i5d4I7flz/NK4DMpSqBRs0z7Tj9uF22LtYDJhNnQPolF4f+ADRLGMsbNHpCKwLcuzCR NlWN+eTY9peGZEfDoJT39u4wdg2ut9aSTv3B+l5HHkfYSS2gNf5yQ3YOVbQp/D6vZvNBCS0n Y5G5ApFil2ZAdoqfllqeQ74eH/dEPqOK1LCiBznKPHoLvTAJgA9v+Lhb9qw1jbIVD56Y88ZW c2iONscDlN2dboAYXGu3pcc8KNFkfc/j3MKRfq6N2l+t/n4ueebtLZypDJ3v9X7cQAkaW90R DhEuPpvvd+MEZGDYH3ZtIokqXZ3G3yiAy4M4TGXg4jX2pQ8ccXciimcp3DaXvqcV/SKnF20Q l6lm0r9sNp8ZBWUkLeMnDnpMdSjlONGuG9TsM50gaDi+kJuy9/fnlA0UGMpQNmBc1wsNAHl/ Q3ObZHUQtsZZN0gYEusDHpNC87SHodMS5YTc/eKx02asEoIoue/vUejkI6dvHWZv93+13y3c ZBhHyfF6SEr5dNkjABEBAAGJAjwEGAEKACYCGwwWIQRyz6whebywJLW1RZADb2ye5/OevwUC WttVSQUJDFmA/AAKCRADb2ye5/Oev9SOD/48JvgAf/PkjW0+TTE5vDaqdlEmNBu3K/vFX4T7 u0YT+qzLGUGYUvISiti9Dl7dV8kTg/Yr20EbHpj2a1Iys03YbR3mn/p6dv9abyqkaSESHN/g PPk1rlEi/j3lyoQsjDN6bpBEwT7Kbgri+Lwtkwp0vGm8I5AOguGlnCuNqsJ2jnHJ6YnEaKKp imIkr8wJVWxmx0OfnZxWrhMr5txD2DG675r1/IyOkU6SnApoD15+fJQmrsSmCKo3cZUMvM5Q 9lUJgdKuC89jJ1NujCzk7SC/EP6xSW0KFGzpqK0leIfh1riQ8DNs9CWreLANKtq35qbDUeGy BHwki0krsRRuNfg+0c+Rc5XOl+vuGmwfblKguIkAKSMSsjslXHqom+9s+mhOqJUSjAHsazlL BkVn00DfooDQBeeOwDlRwmQi+xcV3FomZMf5+4ARmsfzGtRIiJp5pfjek/P9vjeW+UqlE2az teXCmaK0G2LaLVVNnJzrUVQAqpA5eMtd3Ay8IGlhbrfznmAplgUH0aYhR1twIbUF8MeyQYIH fofR+lOnp3/vufJFZWve4S6tbK/OA69+Xr4wKAG95XBw03qZtPFbWu9yk5AYuS02U4akBhFv NfSx4Bs2rcrXZh63VBrlNqecueJdOQiQuY6nGoUa5fiE9glZF5ib9PVa522bBwaI2mW1tbkC DQRSUUKTARAAt6FH3HbDFoumOWUuJlDgOQs3wdp2n3IKv7gqzbDdgaoWW7hDTvjO0Cb6p2PG UKEoxMQQoIdDO0pQ9rgr4Sh4VSVC9WMO/fUwqdrIs2nACIg4OwvNhIccW08S+N72f+yuXWOQ /dv79cwruE26/BEXgIP09MYcOWwcUCXzOoUR3er+jzcsN9uFjcsBVUJLIEru1askHRzCUa5P 9S9GAFBwN49HC5IJWEzdLP27FjjOG5UG3+QZahHrjG1i6S3bIYXtaGsqNyfkp9Is7Wpj2kk+ s9Ua+YMG/V5YVlbANIexa1yr75p1W9biqXpCWnB3TaHSfI0G1t9w8K2qhR/Z1/YLIcRzZ2aH JnvbzJYw5Cs1jfNpFytbASsxj0rbReouftlBvVWFRxsZ+oG1ZXL64/SVKMZAnfBNxd1uajp+ HtoQtYoTu88la6zcdnAhOD5JdOntN2VF8iQnDfPgkidfuSZ1C059xaRPTSRJBgMRDtOlDxgz 7Pxx/7L2jwxRY1dq6NGioflY7CCpGc7bi1K6xnf3lBL8X2nGpRAVsg9Lx1ShIWkgNbTAcPXp XcXlJ1xqz8HS8Twadh6gIfk/RNchBIED9lkVCKHYp/XQb8T8vMwn/kTWUm5WlPkQUFQN4D1b 6+dJw4bwn/wiRS8did1MU1OytJB6tljfEUCx0uKkzqr+33MAEQEAAYkEuwQYAQoAJgIbAhYh BHLPrCF5vLAktbVFkANvbJ7n856/BQJa21VJBQkMUG42AonBvSAEGQEKAGYFAlJRQpNfFIAA AAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5 RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0YzMDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp5OdNFg// ZqeVdGoKkMvALPzZjGz84+6l0kcMxSN4TfWmec0YpSmDEzCw4/SZoGqHlZb8lcTevmNrNXg6 c+wVw6P+Ycl20Nzb98Kt9C5sz+zGVmPPK+3O9gaPnEqlIKnnbxKXXNHQdd8Mf0UTpifMqX0I kWOqhe/tQKGoQ9+feKvLIaToIe/NjosW6vJ9YAgFqZ0015zwbElhMNFmgDMOI2SgjBZ9ngP1 U82Mqb7/7G9GxHtnwuJBSnPJgN8tav2O9uWPC0N8deyZBH4y9ERBPTFMc46wjkW030olcq7g 4hZ55rpPIEyGQZCq4u1gGibbiQJZEyUQT7BJm70/PeUr3uNjPlQODV/lF5TBvqGHEmlSQfo6 Yb/QQx07CK9bvhUSO2XP3ybS8JwoMZlgZzZcjiPiQF9ot6152/Cp/XrsKgtk+fg5ARZpyywR lQk1JCHRZvhgXIxqNYA04uwdPFcLI4vPiDaLS8mhXHLRZsSpHmIBqqrnam5Lq7iDc39UZrSJ MM40oy3iAOI2B7AOCbzxRuEplJd3E/tEqrnFGcPVN+h52ka74lEyfkwA2RrASWJJcXLN3/Vs izEj8okepefzjU/UPnU8sirzeWWo8Z4uKddovk//NwAPUJbee4vZLjYE6MWdpEoZP9CZXbtI PWuc9Djg16aHOgv44JPokDMaHA27A4rw2KwJEANvbJ7n856/SPkP/1bGUde7lnRTNd8c0ZrU tEi+OOibKyh7BjLUpzlihj3rGl9ljAF0eCdBrL1We3MDDcyi+XO7VZLiecZTlG6LLXFvEFjY pyPRx3bXlWk1/ahEiBoLWxedseNdFrO+H5XX6ODmKFFLhXgpsXnAxtM6Mxmrx0CGW4qzfUi7 Vsqj86gqlcet0/k5RqPMAhrGX5fNnQNWSAwumeFKM8UgDpKY0u7M2tS07B0ozXOSpqGTSJhX 6Ld2Nl95CL3wbSGuh1pDUOysAnzK5Rl/OQ9LtYpWomAKg6yn7gKYij5XmekAg/E+ybr5Gyx2 PgMQUGtuNmBRWP1qKtVUbrOekiuNz7kpdrP7M2O7i/cxWjGpVtjDNWuGkFgY3c+sKKawBma8 1K4rg044nkGwFX98vfEHVGu+HOd3D+Mv47nv4LQvzynBG/YflwaPmLhpw7HCPvpa4W7y8+5A KxDqWlM2NvrLwmwbmz9dQMGtjnNRm4uHfPX8AyzBoMtDrxNLIvDYlLqh+G2Q1shNNNdRNXn9 Z1pvri6KAHmH9GlISuM/jQfItout+Gtx9QUlNX3aIsdScTLA3jnMOpHcALCGI+XMiBNaVuYU xHgHh+MNYhmjQZZqASBCvVj1HyibDPZa/iQ4DBGBRlJb+8saPPqYVDQhosWSF20aJKwepZII OFjpMgmCIqZAnqK4uQINBFJRQrgBEADUWFag56O3CaycayGght1rYWYz7P9/3s7OlqAuEAId 8/kSz8jXzAb/Qb6t0247a2MD0gxnjgZQy2OiQOsOTrc31L6tUrLVATL5Q3oKIh9hOlNMA+cR jsgY3UmMaSw+Gftp64EJDBQwBXWT7CSUEJw4PqzwMPiTHRkmqQfzdfNagFJVqZ0e+cznoLzI 9WvkccwLW1kicBYEysX5yOXUQ9/PcKqRWcbxLFznJ16JsxL1DeUct5WRWUxECY2rM0t+AkNR a3NpzskiMUSzFhiGmJo9yyy1RS4drjMhEn/IcM1sO21ZF/WWuUVkul65qngFnaFDDRQ5lU3A agWhLhmppmK/yabSVfqz38B1APoBWuldYprslTbAOJrL2xFtiH7m9VYbP2aGdwr9V/C27kiN Wnm/lYzP9Z+dTFkxw2V+BOjiLWzDDD6pEE7YDhiPyoopadOyXtoJf3aK1OI+DBu3piBA/CDD DvavruM+3mjxUxcOo8w8rMaJzDUDLG0yOyhKWef3UW5ly3CKXe8+m/MZe0GavNBJt0ObLQpP mnn9b2kP/xS0ssszo8uzlfSMiGi9AedAoRQ7vFXfI0MBb0M8gJ6Ht/+j1b5Al9ABeeA3PRuu +aBJwBRdFp4AV5BsCa0Qb3aqVJUPuBvtY56aWWB9sSfQ1qeu/loRxkJbHhaPJswscQARAQAB iQI8BBgBCgAmAhsMFiEEcs+sIXm8sCS1tUWQA29snufznr8FAlrbVUkFCQxQbhEACgkQA29s nufznr+YBw//TJtAC9d/FYQQHKQg/QOEkcAL8Qx4HA2SICnhKqv64jPcYIUYocOO8Qayh+IV Da6MGkbsWdweUFuexMsW+17dqETfQjUApx32TUwF44WgIEfARLW2zRdRcXfsT4A2sQJCvNJr JnH3lywiJi+V848Q4sC3sSJREpcJd07oc2jxSKZyYZ1DBPfK1MyiwcBt2uFCTXdyFMham2aY LDP2JYvFP08tjTUAIKhe4B0bPTtldCf5sH5q8xrpaHnKHf0n7qMmK7NtGW/9R6WiCruiNsLn O95fms1tzKKfA4QXIYCEWl8XsRKwp51HZDjQu/KxPsjm6BL4eThnae9t3Zs5J0LiPxoFbN+p W7anft3YCeezB8+gus7I1Rn5yJMRyYRRVHtZZTBDQfoDqHgLY14GYtFGOT0IR/OuAzYM1CoM vVExgqVWixDwF5RH1OHO1TANqTGcrRm1lvasCWIphpoQVtkN4/PXGa+NhzsRmr/c5OUYxQNr oE8cdsK8mOIBRz9D2JpF7d2nr1X+vA4zk2JL61aCnc62BfSYNZWhCcOPJZUhFT9BqAkew0kk JzQ3jwHGAhfcfozTHoFsD08qAW0OUriEtH+EOXl+dYbjlNUjFPjJu49cZbtp/1TpsYOBdME1 QLM1TPanYXa7tb+IrRZN+Oi9i9VVym16DK7q21k3j0qRC0s= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 12:52:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190608192918.5533b9c7@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pgZP18PqggOVEyH91Db5aG9i2jqxjfbgt" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1ADE76DC5D X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:2610:1c1:1::/48, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:52:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pgZP18PqggOVEyH91Db5aG9i2jqxjfbgt Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="SROTjBFeNaVMLQFYI7iYz8qluuw4Cfz1d"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message References: <20190608192918.5533b9c7@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20190608192918.5533b9c7@raksha.tavi.co.uk> --SROTjBFeNaVMLQFYI7iYz8qluuw4Cfz1d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/06/2019 19:29, Bob Eager wrote: > The committer folded the README file into pkg-message, and I disagree > with this: > 2) It meant that an end user (without access to the ports tree) didn't > have an immediate way to see the README contents. That's not actually correct. ``` % pkg info -D pkgname ``` will display the pkg-message for any package no matter how installed, or if there's a ports tree present or not. However, I agree in general with your position: pkg-message is something that needs to be used sparingly, and not to endlessly repeat either trivial or out-dated messages. The new UCL formatting stuff is an excellent improvement in that regard. Cheers, Matthew --SROTjBFeNaVMLQFYI7iYz8qluuw4Cfz1d-- --pgZP18PqggOVEyH91Db5aG9i2jqxjfbgt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEGfFU7L8RLlBUTj8wAFE/EOCp5OcFAlz88wlfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5 RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0YzMDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp 5Oe2SxAAkbm353MonKcS1++KqudSBpG+ldcH38FawlR51sKXcgJFz1oHAwngGwu+ 2bwf/rA3nPeYk8421fEK3XN7fqWFkKifuFfDwkQxH60LbBgmTdRVb8vX0vnDw6FT ttPimRWl/xZTnLJtEpsZKk9jHXhX25HTUcj9Zr86JpN37/4swkSsbj0+e+WTiMwp b/R2QgMVW+33JuiMmZsfTrANy0EgxOIDExzLClxCKTusJgHDo94oZLw6OSiOUZnL p3A7iyJp8Tymui4r/RWZaP+qHqDVd2S2pAh+Prq3vbB54oKalVB3/TzXlz/XZx50 YND5jTsyMv2qwSoXauBMP6gRLjiLXnsh8nEthTJY7+gDZUGoYfL9hBsXFJ2sqLVR dGSZJam4UYU27uXexltmcg9z2JjE/H2NCd3eP/YXVb99Dd8D7Dv/Ic/JOu3F7IKW EFrCzh4klH4fJRKCb7Zti2E0poLxigRqvtfVYkBvEJzlMWi6b7xm5lVCxePeD4xl CFON/NmVEVsBs84JAeQo0NCQalxHqPJP5KQgRicNoGSC5bN2/G13cUFfD4Sj+gON YLX7qkY62I3S8sxltuCK5zISM8fp1T0c9zOvXeTLhw/Wonydf7gw6rjWq4XLxSfz faM5VLdygT5q9VsXIr4mSXgrbOtieTFJRBm+Efl9CRrvr4/3reQ= =dSW2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgZP18PqggOVEyH91Db5aG9i2jqxjfbgt-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 14:12:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9DE15C856F for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 14:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2849E716D5 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 14:12:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.24] ([10.70.7.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x59ECHSN067738 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 14:12:17 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:12:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2849E716D5 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list1@gjunka.com designates 88.98.225.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list1@gjunka.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.92 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.98.225.149]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gjunka.com]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[gjunka.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.995,0]; IP_SCORE(-3.62)[ip: (-9.48), ipnet: 88.98.192.0/18(-4.74), asn: 56478(-3.79), country: GB(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56478, ipnet:88.98.192.0/18, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 14:12:25 -0000 On 08/06/2019 19:11, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think > we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in > them, and I'd like to get your input. > > pkg-message is shown to every user on every install. UPDATING is only > shown when users run `pkg updating` *and* /usr/ports/UPDATING exists. > I suspect that only a small proportion of users do that. > > pkg-message needs to contain only highly relevant information. Many, > many ports have messages with irrelevant information that users are > likely to get message fatigue and ignore them entirely. I don't want > to pick on Joe Barbish, because his work is absolutely fantastic, but > dns/dns2blackhole/pkg-message is an example of a giant message that > tells users to do the same thing they always do for any port: > ######################################################################## > > dns2blackhole > > Malware Prevention through Domain Blocking (Black Hole) > > Issue "man dns2blackhole" For configuration and usage information > > ######################################################################## > > We now have the ability to specify messages that appear on initial > install, or on upgrades from/to specific version. So here is what I > propose as policy: > > pkg-message must contain only information that is vital to setup and > operation, and that is unique to the port in question. Setup > information should only be shown on initial install, and upgrade > instructions should be shown only when upgrading to the relevant > version. All committers have blanket approval to constrain existing > messages to install/upgrade ranges using the UCL format > specifications. Message pruning falls under the blanket approval as > well, but committers are encouraged to get maintainer input > beforehand. > <<< > > What are your thoughts? > > # Adam I don't like the approach of separating install from update messages. It only works in the ideal scenario, which is almost never. Two reasons: 1. Very rarely I have time to configure all package requirements when installing a bunch of packages. I usually configure a few most important ones and leave the rest for later. Then I need to remember to re-read whatever requirements they might have had. 2. Very rarely just adding packages to the system works. From adding flavours, to removing KDE4, to renaming packages, etc. There is always something going on and almost every time I try to upgrade all packages in the system because of various problems I end up reinstalling all of them anyway (pkg upgrade -f). In either case update messages don't matter. In my opinion there should be just one short message shown when either upgrading or installing. If there are any specific instructions applicable when only installing or upgrading then it's safer to show in both cases with info in what condition they are applicable. When installing packages with many dependencies a typical user isn't even aware which packages have been added / installed and which have been updated. Why make the life more complicated than it needs to be? GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 14:44:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E846B15C9185 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 14:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=EAwu=UI=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 310A47243D for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 14:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=EAwu=UI=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F0128423; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 16:44:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-62-24-92-232.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.92.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8642A2840C; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 16:44:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: Grzegorz Junka , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <3000bc5f-2248-2375-48cd-89709b428fe7@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 16:44:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 310A47243D X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.77)[0.771,0]; IP_SCORE(0.95)[ip: (0.56), ipnet: 94.124.104.0/21(0.28), asn: 42000(3.83), country: CZ(0.08)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.990,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: elsa.codelab.cz]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.105.124.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=EAwu=UI=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=EAwu=UI=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 14:44:46 -0000 Grzegorz Junka wrote on 2019/06/09 16:12: > > On 08/06/2019 19:11, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think >> we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in >> them, and I'd like to get your input. >> >> pkg-message is shown to every user on every install. UPDATING is only >> shown when users run `pkg updating` *and* /usr/ports/UPDATING exists. >> I suspect that only a small proportion of users do that. >> >> pkg-message needs to contain only highly relevant information. Many, >> many ports have messages with irrelevant information that users are >> likely to get message fatigue and ignore them entirely. I don't want >> to pick on Joe Barbish, because his work is absolutely fantastic, but >> dns/dns2blackhole/pkg-message is an example of a giant message that >> tells users to do the same thing they always do for any port: >> ######################################################################## >> >>                        dns2blackhole >> >>     Malware Prevention through Domain Blocking (Black Hole) >> >>     Issue "man dns2blackhole"  For configuration and usage information >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> We now have the ability to specify messages that appear on initial >> install, or on upgrades from/to specific version. So here is what I >> propose as policy: >> >> pkg-message must contain only information that is vital to setup and >> operation, and that is unique to the port in question. Setup >> information should only be shown on initial install, and upgrade >> instructions should be shown only when upgrading to the relevant >> version. All committers have blanket approval to constrain existing >> messages to install/upgrade ranges using the UCL format >> specifications. Message pruning falls under the blanket approval as >> well, but committers are encouraged to get maintainer input >> beforehand. >> <<< >> >> What are your thoughts? >> >> # Adam > > > I don't like the approach of separating install from update messages. It > only works in the ideal scenario, which is almost never. Two reasons: > > 1. Very rarely I have time to configure all package requirements when > installing a bunch of packages. I usually configure a few most important > ones and leave the rest for later. Then I need to remember to re-read > whatever requirements they might have had. > > 2. Very rarely just adding packages to the system works. From adding > flavours, to removing KDE4, to renaming packages, etc. There is always > something going on and almost every time I try to upgrade all packages > in the system because of various problems I end up reinstalling all of > them anyway (pkg upgrade -f). > > In either case update messages don't matter. In my opinion there should > be just one short message shown when either upgrading or installing. If > there are any specific instructions applicable when only installing or > upgrading then it's safer to show in both cases with info in what > condition they are applicable. > > When installing packages with many dependencies a typical user isn't > even aware which packages have been added / installed and which have > been updated. Why make the life more complicated than it needs to be? I disagree. The more the general messages the more noise to users. If something is useful only on the first install why should user read it on each pkg upgrade for many years in a lifetime of a machine? Then some useful info on upgrade will be missed between many useless messages. I remember change in PHP extensions which caused printing of useless notice on every pkg upgrade of every PHP extension. Average webserver has 10 - 20 of them (or more). This was so annoying that I patched our ports/Mk to not print those messages. If new UCL pkg-message format allows us to print only useful information in specific event I am glad it is finally here! The current state of pkg-message is very bad. Info in it is something I totally ignore on each upgrade because it contains useless informations which are printed to me on all machines on each pkg upgrade once or twice a month... Why if the info is useful only for the first install. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 15:33:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2E315C9EA3 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70CBE739B9 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.24] ([10.70.7.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x59FXW3d068682 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:33:33 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <3000bc5f-2248-2375-48cd-89709b428fe7@quip.cz> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <3164f370-fe79-e074-6d1b-0a829eeccadb@gjunka.com> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 16:33:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3000bc5f-2248-2375-48cd-89709b428fe7@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 70CBE739B9 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list1@gjunka.com designates 88.98.225.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list1@gjunka.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.98.225.149]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gjunka.com]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: gjunka.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.971,0]; IP_SCORE(-3.62)[ip: (-9.48), ipnet: 88.98.192.0/18(-4.74), asn: 56478(-3.79), country: GB(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56478, ipnet:88.98.192.0/18, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 15:33:35 -0000 On 09/06/2019 15:44, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Grzegorz Junka wrote on 2019/06/09 16:12: >> >> On 08/06/2019 19:11, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think >>> we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in >>> them, and I'd like to get your input. >>> >>> pkg-message is shown to every user on every install. UPDATING is only >>> shown when users run `pkg updating` *and* /usr/ports/UPDATING exists. >>> I suspect that only a small proportion of users do that. >>> >>> pkg-message needs to contain only highly relevant information. Many, >>> many ports have messages with irrelevant information that users are >>> likely to get message fatigue and ignore them entirely. I don't want >>> to pick on Joe Barbish, because his work is absolutely fantastic, but >>> dns/dns2blackhole/pkg-message is an example of a giant message that >>> tells users to do the same thing they always do for any port: >>> ######################################################################## >>> >>> >>>                        dns2blackhole >>> >>>     Malware Prevention through Domain Blocking (Black Hole) >>> >>>     Issue "man dns2blackhole"  For configuration and usage information >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> >>> >>> We now have the ability to specify messages that appear on initial >>> install, or on upgrades from/to specific version. So here is what I >>> propose as policy: >>> >>> pkg-message must contain only information that is vital to setup and >>> operation, and that is unique to the port in question. Setup >>> information should only be shown on initial install, and upgrade >>> instructions should be shown only when upgrading to the relevant >>> version. All committers have blanket approval to constrain existing >>> messages to install/upgrade ranges using the UCL format >>> specifications. Message pruning falls under the blanket approval as >>> well, but committers are encouraged to get maintainer input >>> beforehand. >>> <<< >>> >>> What are your thoughts? >>> >>> # Adam >> >> >> I don't like the approach of separating install from update messages. >> It only works in the ideal scenario, which is almost never. Two reasons: >> >> 1. Very rarely I have time to configure all package requirements when >> installing a bunch of packages. I usually configure a few most >> important ones and leave the rest for later. Then I need to remember >> to re-read whatever requirements they might have had. >> >> 2. Very rarely just adding packages to the system works. From adding >> flavours, to removing KDE4, to renaming packages, etc. There is >> always something going on and almost every time I try to upgrade all >> packages in the system because of various problems I end up >> reinstalling all of them anyway (pkg upgrade -f). >> >> In either case update messages don't matter. In my opinion there >> should be just one short message shown when either upgrading or >> installing. If there are any specific instructions applicable when >> only installing or upgrading then it's safer to show in both cases >> with info in what condition they are applicable. >> >> When installing packages with many dependencies a typical user isn't >> even aware which packages have been added / installed and which have >> been updated. Why make the life more complicated than it needs to be? > > I disagree. The more the general messages the more noise to users. If > something is useful only on the first install why should user read it > on each pkg upgrade for many years in a lifetime of a machine? Then > some useful info on upgrade will be missed between many useless messages. > I remember change in PHP extensions which caused printing of useless > notice on every pkg upgrade of every PHP extension. Average webserver > has 10 - 20 of them (or more). This was so annoying that I patched our > ports/Mk to not print those messages. > If new UCL pkg-message format allows us to print only useful > information in specific event I am glad it is finally here! > The current state of pkg-message is very bad. Info in it is something > I totally ignore on each upgrade because it contains useless > informations which are printed to me on all machines on each pkg > upgrade once or twice a month... Why if the info is useful only for > the first install. > Because pkg doesn't know if it's a first install or reinstall. My opinion is that they should be short and scarce so that even if all of them are printed it's not a burden to read them. With the PHP example it doesn't seem like a problem with update vs first install but inadequate message being put there in the first place. The first problem is with too many useless messages, the secondary problem is when they are printed. GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 15:48:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E703715CA309 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2227D7480F for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D4E2C15CA308; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBDD15CA307 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A167480E for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id f9so6677090wre.12 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k0B3JHMV8KNIOTSsXi9Q7kkb/Hgf2DDq93Mpdmy0ZRw=; b=PXSHufEHmWJk4P/ToD75xnTztEFZrm6WoRijokXNZMNa+249GRa5g6vgjv9zxQQc8S v1qfMJovKn58d+jSvYsGwEXU78T/RB64TEnmUR13pIL7U/2TOnE8gXA0NxQN46kkAKE6 D1J60R/Wk8G8yPQp8k5MBf/0BXVyUPpH2fD1M+sbKOlP5Z0ZEsTBIKaGvm+PGY1FMy57 QpxcbkMktxI9lBW1qO4tQpZ3dnEWkAisYh2Pevly6LCyXWz1FPDxXRkvqGQ43XdJbsRs fdwwVopRDyofa3KY+Lwyhiu0fZ8eJyZ5map7BlPDJQEF1Zd+iNvRN6Bd2Q1HD7C6OiIq K5EA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k0B3JHMV8KNIOTSsXi9Q7kkb/Hgf2DDq93Mpdmy0ZRw=; b=sDbMBYYjBj4V1NCfMekk2q5ar3DMFAUViIWwnKj49NdjlAi+oI4U13prTK3uHZdTn2 BCXzR41jcXRadzLKrN+9fYL6xSIBp6wyBjwUsn0up4r1f8xxmRXEZkDXAcn5hKDDmB1b BmflDGON3FGvJ/cMw26yp1ohMMXZnsLwHYfVO1lzcXTqmFXn1sqZy58Wm5O6QFzBwh0t NIiQ8FQIa9Hinq+RWY8BxYSRzJZwVKiob2Xgrpne1Wn9DLEFl0YWlsZWd0ovAXlkAkH3 OGvdw6CkraInLuRXxHvSFGyMkOxZ782pAkOOjYOjjE5f2VM5BwbCLJYk6vTU87Uaklm9 +lPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXIs7gKj5+WsZyOEu/fZcGcbh/9mW6PeBtMgpT/nGk3lX2F7vPK A5J/u/ytOx2RvCL/q+0gpYvHgIjqLCt8rQhQAB89cdRxEm0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxsszRpDZjYW5Fcg9PKaufbO9CtJYtvx51AGcSRKUnrhkDNv2Lsm6S8ooNqxHuNTtF5oFrDuE9P5Js9/COJvXY= X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb0f:: with SMTP id s15mr32072290wrn.147.1560095306047; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 08:48:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <736af897-818e-68cd-c354-f295d03fb176@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <736af897-818e-68cd-c354-f295d03fb176@bluerosetech.com> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 09:48:10 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to best check a configuration of another port/package? To: Mel Pilgrim Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 11A167480E X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 15:48:31 -0000 On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 11:00 PM Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > On 2019-06-08 9:57, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 10:02 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > >> > >> In https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237688 we had > >> a user report against lang/gcc* ports that could be traced back to > >> a certain functionality (option) in another port (devel/binutils) > >> missing. > >> > >> In pseudo-code this could be addressed as follows in lang/gcc* > >> > >> .if $(binutils built statically) > >> IGNORE= GCC requires dynamically linked binutils > >> .endif > >> > >> Now the question is: How to implement something like this practically? > > > > What you have there won't work, because `make index` won't work, plus > > Makefiles shouldn't be doing external calls if they don't have to. > > You'll also have a problem whereby LOCALBASE isn't defined yet, and I > > don't believe that IGNORE after bsd.port.pre.mk will work (I could be > > wrong about that). > > > > You have two options: > > 1) Turn it into a pre-configure, which is slightly ugly for the > > end-user but still gets the job done > > pre-configure: > > if some file in binutils is static; then echo "NOPE"; exit 1; fi > > > > 2) (The correct way to do it) Create a binutils-static slave port, > > remove the static option from binutils proper, and depend specifically > > on the non-static port. > > Why is a slave port the correct option here instead of flavouring binutils? No, you're absolutely right. Flavours is the right way to do it now. I keep forgetting about them, because I don't in any way understand how to use them. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 15:55:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BB215CAB5D for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE1375258 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id p11so6705442wre.7 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 08:55:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mT9lQoh+PiMB96CYH6mTFgjGgUbF5GuMYCj0kBsIkdU=; b=ATvFyNlrKTEmzq0A1/o9aJzDqeYrD4qftXXx4+bAEz3E/xE1dm5/ZKN5O6RdJ25icr /YXcsmf6tsWRLeHpgTNnFtiobPOuhhtVcFPxfEnBWp74/3ZPqdjHFtdMSIQS4PnBNb0b tgVbZ2NMzo/YojMdOhSIxe5xko2x+yOnH8sqpTKdJbL/x2kszWcA5zxiCpGd6JiZ86S5 F/tB6kbsm/xK2hS6MeOOgmSouZOEszYfAX97ITW+zkN7bUpiCFO8DZHxsqKWEDkllmCM /oFwxM33yO3H98b1WSoIzRBMEmyqCD8FnJ3pWfFhi0sYX6PiGikEcIsW5Y41B279l5YL dI1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mT9lQoh+PiMB96CYH6mTFgjGgUbF5GuMYCj0kBsIkdU=; b=YduWkXyeL+amTXLjpzEPgtZRlDsUKUOkTqrF9AM9KWFB+t32ruZCZvCAxv3rXO0e4B Dh87+omodOPKiCKdbjsR9RpTec4q4aVIq5LIpawPKlIJ8hAPucMtSTYumkWi4NtN8tCJ BI0L84XzsEFh+pwnC7vWv9PDxDIHfhvq/5zSaJgnEil1hdzy3lUmLCj2RcuI8zcjeSqz kpQ7f9W2d0gNbN0xApWdcI27ufYrzwdheWssKQnusb39d0LVBgr4jGL6wdVX5e7H5wX5 4sqpsMPjd0PTOSjVpkr7tNkSDkHACfmZ2408gEmFojAKxCtywVyZZr52XdDhMJig4voM 16Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXGIU96Mr2ORBQIt6fVLggBcEBGlj3aFn+XBROx8jqH0vOMjrA7 meB8+jxL/7aBEHChUBoWHR/o0IfIF8AMDxMre+2g1VWbPqA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzy/D4MbXxNTWF/voLeruGwsiSNQfbXuQCB8P9vkwafS+5Q5KOH3W13etn6Zz2FCzbPvpKtJXET8a87tr23vqE= X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb0f:: with SMTP id s15mr32090839wrn.147.1560095756360; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 08:55:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3000bc5f-2248-2375-48cd-89709b428fe7@quip.cz> <3164f370-fe79-e074-6d1b-0a829eeccadb@gjunka.com> In-Reply-To: <3164f370-fe79-e074-6d1b-0a829eeccadb@gjunka.com> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 09:55:40 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8EE1375258 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ATvFyNlr; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::443 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.02 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.4.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com]; IP_SCORE(-0.52)[ip: (2.09), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.34), asn: 15169(-2.28), country: US(-0.06)]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 15:55:58 -0000 On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 9:33 AM Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > > On 09/06/2019 15:44, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > Grzegorz Junka wrote on 2019/06/09 16:12: > >> > >> On 08/06/2019 19:11, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>> Hello everyone, > >>> > >>> I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think > >>> we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in > >>> them, and I'd like to get your input. > >>> > >>> pkg-message is shown to every user on every install. UPDATING is only > >>> shown when users run `pkg updating` *and* /usr/ports/UPDATING exists. > >>> I suspect that only a small proportion of users do that. > >>> > >>> pkg-message needs to contain only highly relevant information. Many, > >>> many ports have messages with irrelevant information that users are > >>> likely to get message fatigue and ignore them entirely. I don't want > >>> to pick on Joe Barbish, because his work is absolutely fantastic, but > >>> dns/dns2blackhole/pkg-message is an example of a giant message that > >>> tells users to do the same thing they always do for any port: > >>> ######################################################################## > >>> > >>> > >>> dns2blackhole > >>> > >>> Malware Prevention through Domain Blocking (Black Hole) > >>> > >>> Issue "man dns2blackhole" For configuration and usage information > >>> > >>> ######################################################################## > >>> > >>> > >>> We now have the ability to specify messages that appear on initial > >>> install, or on upgrades from/to specific version. So here is what I > >>> propose as policy: > >>> > >>> pkg-message must contain only information that is vital to setup and > >>> operation, and that is unique to the port in question. Setup > >>> information should only be shown on initial install, and upgrade > >>> instructions should be shown only when upgrading to the relevant > >>> version. All committers have blanket approval to constrain existing > >>> messages to install/upgrade ranges using the UCL format > >>> specifications. Message pruning falls under the blanket approval as > >>> well, but committers are encouraged to get maintainer input > >>> beforehand. > >>> <<< > >>> > >>> What are your thoughts? > >>> > >>> # Adam > >> > >> > >> I don't like the approach of separating install from update messages. > >> It only works in the ideal scenario, which is almost never. Two reasons: > >> > >> 1. Very rarely I have time to configure all package requirements when > >> installing a bunch of packages. I usually configure a few most > >> important ones and leave the rest for later. Then I need to remember > >> to re-read whatever requirements they might have had. > >> > >> 2. Very rarely just adding packages to the system works. From adding > >> flavours, to removing KDE4, to renaming packages, etc. There is > >> always something going on and almost every time I try to upgrade all > >> packages in the system because of various problems I end up > >> reinstalling all of them anyway (pkg upgrade -f). > >> > >> In either case update messages don't matter. In my opinion there > >> should be just one short message shown when either upgrading or > >> installing. If there are any specific instructions applicable when > >> only installing or upgrading then it's safer to show in both cases > >> with info in what condition they are applicable. > >> > >> When installing packages with many dependencies a typical user isn't > >> even aware which packages have been added / installed and which have > >> been updated. Why make the life more complicated than it needs to be? > > > > I disagree. The more the general messages the more noise to users. If > > something is useful only on the first install why should user read it > > on each pkg upgrade for many years in a lifetime of a machine? Then > > some useful info on upgrade will be missed between many useless messages. > > I remember change in PHP extensions which caused printing of useless > > notice on every pkg upgrade of every PHP extension. Average webserver > > has 10 - 20 of them (or more). This was so annoying that I patched our > > ports/Mk to not print those messages. > > If new UCL pkg-message format allows us to print only useful > > information in specific event I am glad it is finally here! > > The current state of pkg-message is very bad. Info in it is something > > I totally ignore on each upgrade because it contains useless > > informations which are printed to me on all machines on each pkg > > upgrade once or twice a month... Why if the info is useful only for > > the first install. > > > > Because pkg doesn't know if it's a first install or reinstall. My > opinion is that they should be short and scarce so that even if all of > them are printed it's not a burden to read them. With the PHP example it > doesn't seem like a problem with update vs first install but inadequate > message being put there in the first place. The first problem is with > too many useless messages, the secondary problem is when they are printed. We are in complete agreement on the first point (they should be specific and relevant). On the second point, I definitely hear you that pkgs IRL aren't always simply "new install and then upgrade forever." However, I feel like we have a great opportunity here: When only the bare minimum and highly relevant information is present, you should rarely see pkg messages. So when a port suddenly has one, you know that the upgrade you just did needs attention. Would it be more helpful if there were a big header before each upgrade message saying "UPGRADE INFORMATION:"? That might make it clearer that this is a thing to look at. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 17:11:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8829F15CC1D7 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 17:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52DED8008B for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 17:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.24] ([10.70.7.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x59HBavw069876 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Jun 2019 17:11:37 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports References: <3000bc5f-2248-2375-48cd-89709b428fe7@quip.cz> <3164f370-fe79-e074-6d1b-0a829eeccadb@gjunka.com> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <9cdc9964-835a-dbbb-c79b-328652da87e7@gjunka.com> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:11:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 52DED8008B X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list1@gjunka.com designates 88.98.225.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list1@gjunka.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.92 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.98.225.149]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gjunka.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: gjunka.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.988,0]; IP_SCORE(-3.62)[ip: (-9.48), ipnet: 88.98.192.0/18(-4.74), asn: 56478(-3.79), country: GB(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56478, ipnet:88.98.192.0/18, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 17:11:40 -0000 On 09/06/2019 16:55, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 9:33 AM Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> >> On 09/06/2019 15:44, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> Grzegorz Junka wrote on 2019/06/09 16:12: >>>> On 08/06/2019 19:11, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think >>>>> we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in >>>>> them, and I'd like to get your input. >>>>> >>>>> pkg-message is shown to every user on every install. UPDATING is only >>>>> shown when users run `pkg updating` *and* /usr/ports/UPDATING exists. >>>>> I suspect that only a small proportion of users do that. >>>>> >>>>> pkg-message needs to contain only highly relevant information. Many, >>>>> many ports have messages with irrelevant information that users are >>>>> likely to get message fatigue and ignore them entirely. I don't want >>>>> to pick on Joe Barbish, because his work is absolutely fantastic, but >>>>> dns/dns2blackhole/pkg-message is an example of a giant message that >>>>> tells users to do the same thing they always do for any port: >>>>> ######################################################################## >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> dns2blackhole >>>>> >>>>> Malware Prevention through Domain Blocking (Black Hole) >>>>> >>>>> Issue "man dns2blackhole" For configuration and usage information >>>>> >>>>> ######################################################################## >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We now have the ability to specify messages that appear on initial >>>>> install, or on upgrades from/to specific version. So here is what I >>>>> propose as policy: >>>>> >>>>> pkg-message must contain only information that is vital to setup and >>>>> operation, and that is unique to the port in question. Setup >>>>> information should only be shown on initial install, and upgrade >>>>> instructions should be shown only when upgrading to the relevant >>>>> version. All committers have blanket approval to constrain existing >>>>> messages to install/upgrade ranges using the UCL format >>>>> specifications. Message pruning falls under the blanket approval as >>>>> well, but committers are encouraged to get maintainer input >>>>> beforehand. >>>>> <<< >>>>> >>>>> What are your thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> # Adam >>>> >>>> I don't like the approach of separating install from update messages. >>>> It only works in the ideal scenario, which is almost never. Two reasons: >>>> >>>> 1. Very rarely I have time to configure all package requirements when >>>> installing a bunch of packages. I usually configure a few most >>>> important ones and leave the rest for later. Then I need to remember >>>> to re-read whatever requirements they might have had. >>>> >>>> 2. Very rarely just adding packages to the system works. From adding >>>> flavours, to removing KDE4, to renaming packages, etc. There is >>>> always something going on and almost every time I try to upgrade all >>>> packages in the system because of various problems I end up >>>> reinstalling all of them anyway (pkg upgrade -f). >>>> >>>> In either case update messages don't matter. In my opinion there >>>> should be just one short message shown when either upgrading or >>>> installing. If there are any specific instructions applicable when >>>> only installing or upgrading then it's safer to show in both cases >>>> with info in what condition they are applicable. >>>> >>>> When installing packages with many dependencies a typical user isn't >>>> even aware which packages have been added / installed and which have >>>> been updated. Why make the life more complicated than it needs to be? >>> I disagree. The more the general messages the more noise to users. If >>> something is useful only on the first install why should user read it >>> on each pkg upgrade for many years in a lifetime of a machine? Then >>> some useful info on upgrade will be missed between many useless messages. >>> I remember change in PHP extensions which caused printing of useless >>> notice on every pkg upgrade of every PHP extension. Average webserver >>> has 10 - 20 of them (or more). This was so annoying that I patched our >>> ports/Mk to not print those messages. >>> If new UCL pkg-message format allows us to print only useful >>> information in specific event I am glad it is finally here! >>> The current state of pkg-message is very bad. Info in it is something >>> I totally ignore on each upgrade because it contains useless >>> informations which are printed to me on all machines on each pkg >>> upgrade once or twice a month... Why if the info is useful only for >>> the first install. >>> >> Because pkg doesn't know if it's a first install or reinstall. My >> opinion is that they should be short and scarce so that even if all of >> them are printed it's not a burden to read them. With the PHP example it >> doesn't seem like a problem with update vs first install but inadequate >> message being put there in the first place. The first problem is with >> too many useless messages, the secondary problem is when they are printed. > We are in complete agreement on the first point (they should be > specific and relevant). On the second point, I definitely hear you > that pkgs IRL aren't always simply "new install and then upgrade > forever." However, I feel like we have a great opportunity here: When > only the bare minimum and highly relevant information is present, you > should rarely see pkg messages. So when a port suddenly has one, you > know that the upgrade you just did needs attention. > > Would it be more helpful if there were a big header before each > upgrade message saying "UPGRADE INFORMATION:"? That might make it > clearer that this is a thing to look at. > > # Adam > That's a good approach. Best if pkg was able to print UPGRADE and INSTALL information in separate sections. In fact, INSTALL messages aren't only about information relevant when installing. What we see as INSTALL is really the "minimal configuration required for the installed pkg to function correctly which couldn't be applied by pkg and has to be done manually". In that sense it's irrelevant if the package is being updated or installed. However, I understand that skipping it when only upgrading may make the overall experience less cluttered. How about an option in pkg, say -ma (print all important configuration notes), -mu (print only update notes, could be default) ? Some context: I am a user of a few FreeBSD desktops (compiling all my packages with poudriere and custom options, which probably isn't relevant). I never remember which options I have enabled on which desktop, so whenever I do an install/upgrade I skim through all messages to ensure appropriate options are set in the system. Also, because there is so many irrelevant messages, it's easy to overlook important messages, so going through them again from time to time helps to avoid further frustration. Definitely pkgs IRL aren't "new install and then upgrade forever.". Based on experience my upgrade path looks like this:  a. Delete unused packages  b. Install any new packages I would like to have  c. pkg autoremove and cut_leaves for better hygiene  d. Reinstall all with "pkg upgrade -f" Too often I was bitten by partially updated packages and non-existent conflicts between installed files or packages to just trust in a normal install/upgrade. But since I am always reinstalling all packages I don't really care about "update" notes because I see all the install notes anyway. I just feel like if the split between UPDATE/INSTALL notes was a poor workaround for having too many irrelevant notes and for pkg not being reliable enough. GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 19:42:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FA815A87FA for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 19:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F128D842C2 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 19:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 13:42:23 -0600 References: <3000bc5f-2248-2375-48cd-89709b428fe7@quip.cz> <3164f370-fe79-e074-6d1b-0a829eeccadb@gjunka.com> To: Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports In-Reply-To: <3164f370-fe79-e074-6d1b-0a829eeccadb@gjunka.com> Message-Id: <2E4B0C03-14E5-4915-8649-9588E8ADC8E8@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F128D842C2 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.25 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.963,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.29)[ip: (-0.98), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.34), asn: 209(-0.06), country: US(-0.06)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.covisp.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.61)[-0.607,0]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:42:32 -0000 On 9 Jun2019, at 09:33, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > Because pkg doesn't know if it's a first install or reinstall. This is a solvable issue, however. There are may things that could be = checked to see if this is a new install or not, though some go them = will require some additional tracking pf [ports as they are added and = removed. --=20 These go to 11 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 9 20:48:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C913915A9FCD for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8DA85FB2 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833B33E86C for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 21:48:38 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=tavi.co.uk; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=edUnN40 WsAHTvMEG24fvZlw+zGc=; b=a24TIDdfG/fPbTTy7yqbLNjf37xuAT+prkEC9by bHsgpWMkMjnt4rOQ2sAGtCY4QJ6dzjLEMrizaF4uBG9zO6qMBRWkQjNS/9QbaZon iqszMvZlZbC6bf58IYwaYq32utrO6jEKG17J7gzihv7yVQnpmBC6nBpT1h3BjWwX aeho= Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) (Authenticated sender: rde@tavi.co.uk) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B1383E813 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 21:48:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 21:48:26 +0100 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message Message-ID: <20190609214726.598bbee9@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20190608192918.5533b9c7@raksha.tavi.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7D8DA85FB2 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tavi.co.uk header.s=selector1 header.b=a24TIDdf; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tavi.co.uk; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rde@tavi.co.uk designates 81.187.145.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rde@tavi.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.39 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tavi.co.uk:s=selector1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:kipling.tavi.co.uk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tavi.co.uk:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tavi.co.uk,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[kipling.tavi.co.uk,khan.tavi.co.uk,mx444501.smtp-engine.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.84)[-0.841,0]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.74)[asn: 20712(-3.60), country: GB(-0.09)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20712, ipnet:81.187.0.0/16, country:GB] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 20:48:52 -0000 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkVEIE1FU1NBR0UtLS0tLQ0KSGFzaDogU0hBMjU2DQoNCk9uIFN1 biwgOSBKdW4gMjAxOSAxMjo1Mjo0MSArMDEwMA0KTWF0dGhldyBTZWFtYW4gPG1hdHRoZXdARnJl ZUJTRC5vcmc+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IE9uIDA4LzA2LzIwMTkgMTk6MjksIEJvYiBFYWdlciB3cm90 ZToNCj4gPiBUaGUgY29tbWl0dGVyIGZvbGRlZCB0aGUgUkVBRE1FIGZpbGUgaW50byBwa2ctbWVz c2FnZSwgYW5kIEkNCj4gPiBkaXNhZ3JlZSB3aXRoIHRoaXM6ICANCj4gDQo+ID4gMikgSXQgbWVh bnQgdGhhdCBhbiBlbmQgdXNlciAod2l0aG91dCBhY2Nlc3MgdG8gdGhlIHBvcnRzIHRyZWUpDQo+ ID4gZGlkbid0IGhhdmUgYW4gaW1tZWRpYXRlIHdheSB0byBzZWUgdGhlIFJFQURNRSBjb250ZW50 cy4gIA0KPiANCj4gVGhhdCdzIG5vdCBhY3R1YWxseSBjb3JyZWN0Lg0KPiANCj4gYGBgDQo+ICUg cGtnIGluZm8gLUQgcGtnbmFtZQ0KPiBgYGANCj4gDQo+IHdpbGwgZGlzcGxheSB0aGUgcGtnLW1l c3NhZ2UgZm9yIGFueSBwYWNrYWdlIG5vIG1hdHRlciBob3cgaW5zdGFsbGVkLA0KPiBvciBpZiB0 aGVyZSdzIGEgcG9ydHMgdHJlZSBwcmVzZW50IG9yIG5vdC4NCg0KSSBhY3R1YWxseSBjaGVja2Vk IHRoZSBtYW4gcGFnZSBiZWZvcmUgSSBzYWlkIHRoYXQsIGFuZCBzdGlsbCBtaXNzZWQgaXQhDQoN CkJ1dCB5ZXMsIHRoZXJlIGlzIHRvbyBtdWNoIHBrZy1tZXNzYWdlIG5vaXNlLg0KDQotLS0tLUJF R0lOIFBHUCBTSUdOQVRVUkUtLS0tLQ0KDQppUUV6QkFFQkNBQWRGaUVFVmdkSTJLZVZsZFBBaFVZ YUtCZGYyYXo4ZTZnRkFsejljSm9BQ2drUUtCZGYyYXo4DQplNmdtSmdmOENaM0NyZUlpcjFkOWNm aVRsWVNyTzJhRUU3S1F3V2JidS9GTjdpMlppcU9OdzM0Yy9GTmc3SGNqDQpmMnFMSzVLYlYvdWVY TGROZ1JBU0ZaWE4yRWtFQXgza1ppYTBwRXNwTFNNNkF4c2Y3VkV1b3BuUkZqSTU0ZWk0DQpqRlp3 SzZQNDNoeU1JNVY3cG83dzMyRW9jamQ0ZGxuS08vYUhjUGFabEpHNG5sZDJsMHdIVTlxVmkxQzVU ZVlzDQo5Zy81Ty8zY0xOYzIweEpLQnVpamFEODZycUk3SUVMc1ovSGhnTUtrYmZWVDF2U3c4SFJB MWRnVUpoQTZ6K3RiDQpkMGlmVVlhZTZjOEVZUmJ6YnNERldTL0p3TGx5NUFoemdNTlAxZlZ5cTlw bTZ4cGdoaUxDMXVXQWR3Sml6bExBDQoyK3ZyZjltdjBLbjErcGJ0VkNlMm92VW5OSk9odHc9PQ0K PUNteWYNCi0tLS0tRU5EIFBHUCBTSUdOQVRVUkUtLS0tLQ0K From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 10 08:27:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E5B15B8A5A for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4BA97AFD; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x5A8RSmI038310 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:27:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: net/dropbox-api-command ignores proxy settings To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: woodsb02@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:27:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0B4BA97AFD X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.13)[ip: (-3.42), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-1.71), asn: 30722(-0.57), country: IT(0.05)]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailserver.netfence.it]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.74)[-0.737,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:27:47 -0000 Hello. Not sure if I'm doing something wrong, if it's a bug upstream or a problem related to FreeBSD ports... I'm unable to get dropbox-api to use proxy settings. I have "HTTP_PROXY=http://192.168.xxx.yyy:zzzz/" in my env and I'm using the -e switch to the sync command. AFAICT from the documentation this should make dropbox-api use that proxy, but it doesn't. I also tried "dropbox-api setup -e", but again it tries to connect directly. Anyone has succeded in using this tool through a proxy? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 10 09:13:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2279E15B9F02 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp13.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE896A964 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from postfix.malikania.fr ([5.135.187.121]) by mwinf5d72 with ME id NxDZ2000B2dbEiD03xDZ4Q; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:13:34 +0200 X-ME-Helo: postfix.malikania.fr X-ME-Auth: ZGVtZWxpZXIuZGF2aWRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:13:34 +0200 X-ME-IP: 5.135.187.121 Received: from [167.3.108.158] (unknown [77.159.242.243]) by postfix.malikania.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7204204AC1 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: David Demelier Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:13:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7EE896A964 X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.98)[0.978,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[malikania.fr]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[135.242.12.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.982,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[malikania.fr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3215, ipnet:80.12.240.0/20, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(1.21)[ip: (2.99), ipnet: 80.12.240.0/20(1.71), asn: 3215(1.35), country: FR(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:13:44 -0000 Le 08/06/2019 à 20:11, Adam Weinberger a écrit : > Hello everyone, > > I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think > we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in > them, and I'd like to get your input. > > pkg-message is shown to every user on every install. UPDATING is only > shown when users run `pkg updating` *and* /usr/ports/UPDATING exists. > I suspect that only a small proportion of users do that. > > pkg-message needs to contain only highly relevant information. Many, > many ports have messages with irrelevant information that users are > likely to get message fatigue and ignore them entirely. I don't want > to pick on Joe Barbish, because his work is absolutely fantastic, but > dns/dns2blackhole/pkg-message is an example of a giant message that > tells users to do the same thing they always do for any port: > ######################################################################## > > dns2blackhole > > Malware Prevention through Domain Blocking (Black Hole) > > Issue "man dns2blackhole" For configuration and usage information > > ######################################################################## > > We now have the ability to specify messages that appear on initial > install, or on upgrades from/to specific version. So here is what I > propose as policy: > >>>> > pkg-message must contain only information that is vital to setup and > operation, and that is unique to the port in question. Setup > information should only be shown on initial install, and upgrade > instructions should be shown only when upgrading to the relevant > version. All committers have blanket approval to constrain existing > messages to install/upgrade ranges using the UCL format > specifications. Message pruning falls under the blanket approval as > well, but committers are encouraged to get maintainer input > beforehand. > <<< > > What are your thoughts? > > # Adam > > I've also proposed an idea to remove all fancy styles from those messages especially because their are not uniformized. Unfortunately it didn't get much attention saying that it's not a real necessity to work on changing this just for aesthetic purposes. But if we start making a policy on that, could be nice to include this too. Regards -- David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 10 09:18:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0AC15BA076 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp13.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87CE46AAF6 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from postfix.malikania.fr ([5.135.187.121]) by mwinf5d72 with ME id NxJq2000K2dbEiD03xJqXU; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:18:50 +0200 X-ME-Helo: postfix.malikania.fr X-ME-Auth: ZGVtZWxpZXIuZGF2aWRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:18:50 +0200 X-ME-IP: 5.135.187.121 Received: from [167.3.108.158] (unknown [77.159.242.243]) by postfix.malikania.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90335204B3E for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:18:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Cleaning up pkg-message To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: David Demelier Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:18:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 87CE46AAF6 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.92)[0.924,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: malikania.fr]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[135.242.12.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.975,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[malikania.fr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3215, ipnet:80.12.240.0/20, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(1.19)[ip: (2.91), ipnet: 80.12.240.0/20(1.71), asn: 3215(1.35), country: FR(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:18:53 -0000 Le 10/06/2019 à 11:13, David Demelier a écrit : > I've also proposed an idea to remove all fancy styles from those > messages especially because their are not uniformized. One answer to my proposal : https://marc.info/?l=freebsd-ports&m=127731211606211&w=2 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 11 08:02:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E4E15B211F for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668C880FD2 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1D0B715B2117; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0904815B2116 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F9880FC7 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF4B155D9 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5B82YEK057110 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5B82YJl057109; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201906110802.x5B82YJl057109@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:34 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:02:36 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/busybox | 1.26.2 | 1.31.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 11 15:14:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FD815BE277 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967556A078 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 568E115BE275; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E0415BE274 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75126A076 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1A01934E for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5BFEB3q046697 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:11 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5BFEBh9046696 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:11 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:11 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201906111514.x5BFEBh9046696@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:14:14 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.sysutils --- sh: freebsd-version: not found make[5]: "/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/sysutils/etc_os-release/Makefile" line 18: warning: "freebsd-version -u" returned non-zero status --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/ports-mgmt/porttools: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/textproc/cdiff Committers on the hook: joneum mat tobik Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': D devel/tokei/files U devel/tokei/Makefile U devel/tokei/distinfo U www/apache24/Makefile A www/apache24/files/patch-modules__filters__mod_reqtimeout.c-bug-63325 U x11-themes/plata-theme/Makefile U x11-themes/plata-theme/distinfo U Mk/Uses/php.mk U MOVED D textproc/cdiff U textproc/Makefile A textproc/ydiff A textproc/ydiff/Makefile A textproc/ydiff/distinfo A textproc/ydiff/pkg-descr U dns/bind9-devel/Makefile U dns/bind9-devel/files/named.in U dns/bind914/Makefile U dns/bind914/files/named.in U sysutils/munin-node/Makefile Updated to revision 503961. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 11 18:10:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCCB15C1B4E for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F326FC37 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 78B1615C1B45; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669E215C1B44 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02FFE6FC2B for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339901AC8E for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5BIAbY5039842 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:37 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5BIAbIW039840 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:37 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:37 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201906111810.x5BIAbIW039840@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:10:39 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 13 07:59:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC9615CF000 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6AD7085C for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BF95215CEFF9; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD54515CEFF7 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CF270850 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D4FDF346 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5D7xC3M005145 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:12 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5D7xCL8005144; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:12 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201906130759.x5D7xCL8005144@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:12 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:59:14 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/bs | 2.10 | 2.11 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 13 15:35:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAE015B4DBE for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70C188EF8 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x5DFZA5j046624 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:35:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: FireFox and NFSv4 Message-ID: <08924a7b-d2dc-468e-493d-472487344698@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:35:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A70C188EF8 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.52 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailserver.netfence.it]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.959,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; IP_SCORE(-1.26)[ip: (-3.77), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-1.88), asn: 30722(-0.67), country: IT(0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:35:27 -0000 Hello. For years I've had my home on an NFSv3 server. Finally I decided to move to NFSv4. Now the following happens every now and then (let's say, 1 out of 5 times I launch it): _ FireFox is closed (no process running); _ I open FireFox and, while it works, a red message appears saying: "The bookmarks and history system will not be functional because one of Firefox's files is in use by another application. Some security software can cause this problem"; _ I can close FireFox, but I'll have to wait for a while to reopen it, or I'll get the "Firefox is already running but not responding" window. _ After a while I can open it again with no warning. Nothing to really worry about, but I'm curious (and would like to be sure no latent problem is there). Of course I beleive the reference to "security software" does not apply to UNIX systems; I don't think anything is accessing FF files either. What should I check? bye & Thanks in advance av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 13 15:56:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F231515B5AC8 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1668B0BF for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m23so19016778lje.12 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:56:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FK/4TlS/3FZYMceDaYH2uPEF4UermpV41o1RnCT9WXk=; b=GpJryJPzX5OgkiNCw0cZQml6qTFTBoMn0EWkfbPDYRuFLA0fC6dx9Q6A/k4J8F5rBW P1v83+xZ33XWvTa/sL+Ayl0Vxwv1IICjfkFT/Q5hHPqECIyQRimafrq3yTyO/6xeUcuI UcDVKhYbFi8hr/t3inmojg7w6f/hunW9tai8Bqic4FB+6l7YvvOgfjE64pXtOdavJN71 EpbOhlSSCV0S1W3y84t9SN7BqeuE/U6Rd6ejcXidpYzdrcK3Ow84XSvNnoRZLbo6tcwP X8tLK8YHZS+lJO6vyUFFB5vaG4pQRZtlSoNNdPzGiSG1tSpEpkebXnGQRy9P72egaHNh npjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FK/4TlS/3FZYMceDaYH2uPEF4UermpV41o1RnCT9WXk=; b=G3mgxbQc1g4d2pyL3pie0cEmb7vne2a6D0BmVM4fbho7Kuq1DeJCh1pZoTUanEgcFS RfHdnWPvh/3WtZaYhavurW2KrRsphbsmibchbb7kcvJ5kxDU2i7XKJ9auGPAUDblXo3J jSs3fhuQRQuc3NUlCY6oM8JZE4RndGg9kfphTPRvyKBvWlELS1f+f9qSkqrEYQRtwUNJ MsB7O3RLRIMMPIuCRZa30o86UXc8CyyeOis2BI4KxzgTL0lbW2OfV+6RJfVpSfUZKe/3 vS6bos5mfO/Ozjv9N0gKr+uUlplGbEl4EA/I5gzXCJbfu+E5KG6xnp6FLrViepdyKNx9 s4Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXukfhaqAHX7Psz65rVn+uxtS/G/rxRbCWj3hD6ENgpzi8ur+7H 3c5oNqfqNkH8nqyxjJpyAqD5D1u3EAnLtpafFkA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwcENAmX0ugm0IhijJ0sqYXJLErsNYkAAVDA6wfFGO1o/YoruI/yZ62vLcDrCbtRJvfhtRDvsl5Z9KbCz1j5ao= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1510:: with SMTP id s16mr19228051ljd.19.1560441373012; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:56:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <08924a7b-d2dc-468e-493d-472487344698@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <08924a7b-d2dc-468e-493d-472487344698@netfence.it> From: Freddie Cash Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:56:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FireFox and NFSv4 To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-ports X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8A1668B0BF X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GpJryJPz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fjwcash@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fjwcash@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.32 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.52)[-0.517,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[a.2.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.79)[ip: (-9.12), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.46), asn: 15169(-2.31), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:56:16 -0000 On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:36 AM Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > For years I've had my home on an NFSv3 server. > Finally I decided to move to NFSv4. > > Now the following happens every now and then (let's say, 1 out of 5 > times I launch it): > _ FireFox is closed (no process running); > _ I open FireFox and, while it works, a red message appears saying: > "The bookmarks and history system will not be functional because one of > Firefox's files is in use by another application. Some security software > can cause this problem"; > _ I can close FireFox, but I'll have to wait for a while to reopen it, > or I'll get the "Firefox is already running but not responding" window. > _ After a while I can open it again with no warning. > > Nothing to really worry about, but I'm curious (and would like to be > sure no latent problem is there). > > Of course I beleive the reference to "security software" does not apply > to UNIX systems; I don't think anything is accessing FF files either. > > What should I check? > Seems to be a known issue with NFS storage of the .mozilla folder that's made worse with NFSv4: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428169 Has to do with file locking and race conditions in the multi-process setup, and using SQLite databases for everything. There's a couple of workaround listed in there (see comment 29) that work for most people. -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 13 16:00:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C9915B5BCF for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259578B309 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D9F6915B5BCE; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C4E15B5BCD for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E43ED8B2ED for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from lrrr.mouf.net (cpe-174-109-174-192.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.174.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id x5DG0aSe079605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:42 GMT (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mouf.net; s=mail; t=1560441646; bh=fVGw3HwuU8RmmiFUlXU4QcXQeacYtakwWdErPcwJaE0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=tBA+zahXqPehhh0mK18qY+4V32Gyyq4rw+RSR3rVlmhb19ufiTM0w03boW7w+9fN1 q8lMbHnJ2VZiRB7Eoyj12NwpSK7B/yyHp/1fzuR3VuTiEc6z/8vUrPiLsipB3oIZEO iEoT1Buk0AZQ3DANOI0wlD/4K9+0gsnAEDsOw5Sc= Subject: Re: How to best check a configuration of another port/package? To: Adam Weinberger , Mel Pilgrim Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Gerald Pfeifer References: <736af897-818e-68cd-c354-f295d03fb176@bluerosetech.com> From: Steve Wills Message-ID: <40631880-8ec7-03b9-5fde-2e7b15ff5c51@mouf.net> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:00:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E43ED8B2ED X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=mouf.net header.s=mail header.b=tBA+zahX X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.958,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[192.174.109.174.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[mouf.net:s=mail]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[mouf.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[mouf.net:-]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.mouf.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.715,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:fc50::/36, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.70)[ip: (-9.17), ipnet: 2607:fc50::/36(-0.39), asn: 36236(-3.88), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:00:55 -0000 Hi, On 6/9/19 11:48 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > No, you're absolutely right. Flavours is the right way to do it now. I > keep forgetting about them, because I don't in any way understand how > to use them. Hmm, flavors have to be something that can be installed in parallel, right? How does that impact binutils? The approach I would have taken would have been to make the static option in binutils also install an empty file in DATADIR and have GCC check that file. Maybe that isn't ideal. Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 13 16:41:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED3815B79E9 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 344D88D0DC for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: matthew/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFE4C18FA4 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:41:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from leaf.local (unknown [88.212.184.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D59F1A288 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/D59F1A288; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: How to best check a configuration of another port/package? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <736af897-818e-68cd-c354-f295d03fb176@bluerosetech.com> <40631880-8ec7-03b9-5fde-2e7b15ff5c51@mouf.net> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <1b6495b3-9d61-9794-50f3-c9460f51554d@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:41:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40631880-8ec7-03b9-5fde-2e7b15ff5c51@mouf.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 344D88D0DC X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:41:32 -0000 On 13/06/2019 17:00, Steve Wills wrote: > Hmm, flavors have to be something that can be installed in parallel, > right? How does that impact binutils? They don't /have/ to be something that can be installed in parallel. Different flavours of the same package can conflict with each other. Look at the editors/emacs port for a nice little self-contained example. The majority of flavoured packages do support parallel installs, but that's because they're mostly python modules and python allows multiple versions of itself to be installed concurrently. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 00:38:26 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1A815C1AD5 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from viclamta38p.bpe.bigpond.com (viclamta38p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5097511E for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.26.4]) by viclafep27p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20190613212647.PJFB28273.viclafep27p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:26:47 +1000 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudehledgudeiudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfupfevtfgpvffgnffuvfftteenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffujgfkfhgfgggtsehttddttddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpeffrghvvgcujfhorhhsfhgrlhhluceouggrvhgvsehhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrgheqnecukfhppeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqedprhgtphhtthhopeeofhhrvggvsghsugdqphhorhhtshesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgheqnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (9.0.019.26-1) id 5BB3FAC333C36755 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:26:47 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5DLQkHJ056138 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:26:46 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x5DLQjUf056135 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:26:46 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:26:45 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: FireFox and NFSv4 In-Reply-To: <08924a7b-d2dc-468e-493d-472487344698@netfence.it> Message-ID: References: <08924a7b-d2dc-468e-493d-472487344698@netfence.it> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0B5097511E X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=neutral (mx1.freebsd.org: 203.38.21.102 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of dave@horsfall.org) smtp.mailfrom=dave@horsfall.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted]; R_SPF_NEUTRAL(0.00)[?all]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[horsfall.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.933,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.33)[ipnet: 203.36.0.0/14(-3.71), asn: 1221(-2.95), country: AU(0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[102.21.38.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:38:27 -0000 On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > For years I've had my home on an NFSv3 server. > Finally I decided to move to NFSv4. [...] I got bitten quite badly by NFS in its early years; I see nothing much has changed... I think it was to do with file-locking, I think. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 04:25:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C8515C58A1 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eancaer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe42.google.com (mail-vs1-xe42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA47E82A90 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eancaer@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe42.google.com with SMTP id a186so931243vsd.7 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:25:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pEoBH5TBV1IxaMcX8AeU2qsr6Ze0ZfVw6+bZTcNele0=; b=Aue0DR2uqqxOkuKa4GYK6XwpS+92nJhD6uLwkY3LvDaacn9Y1iOf3gnuLHq1+dla2E sqoM45WexYJsqFyp55WC8MDxzS4xuMfHwZUqGl+4/RflHMSQwxAQhepx5XFRTMamD8cQ jVHBrYiiHzkDa7DwNY6CsGaK/cGxzB3hunOoUyebatAWK7Aot+Byvj0ztRc40H6M6mk5 RVu+o6Y4HyojXwZO5BMN7z273hly6BGmd+mbQRmyrYdNkE9jvI5SBFTIzTHdc6F07hsm H14zOOveI6R7HdGYuqO/44toTR3ntZU/sVkpPom+2SgOJrp/Z1HWa3sps3NzS8OuQGte xGvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=pEoBH5TBV1IxaMcX8AeU2qsr6Ze0ZfVw6+bZTcNele0=; b=G4eqowP6IFo/Bi2elNXmF+Rn+eZDIRkSLvogBDtu63RP9mTRxJLVGk6P75sYB845el Rfbf55TdwJ9ViCAOfCpyFnuKej/mZmROdVelhWodHS7KeBXuuWgVCNlsGJvnJAhJ5ol1 qSYUWi6zn38kMU1+oMsZ6KGU+qjwC/cW+kVWnXUIOh6IbdxAdnFJWJ5YimAQCtQxe7S0 lX1zsxbTmqQWZkeVNfeeWgjQurM4jCAEzPtJfi76VkoCCtzMQ0lDPfTGXmaq3Zzk4hH0 QgSVqklJ6QDeDgAcdFNblsEdm5RMJ+gmjTdc0Blby5ij6wNHGl6wUXir5HsEZQev1UVj mTyA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2cAs9f5QGpZJYOhNuESYldfHHRJfrFzIEyRlh8wAnAQO8e4Qq SksTJEhYGFFa1T9wqBU6qQMu/G4HV8B2eBMw17Hdf0KL X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz0CNp//YmjeJS/EXmMIzh3m+m7QlxqKM2fOw61gmRwMHpVRkiF3qBluuSupWXKK49UJQExylW9W+KwChuOXkw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:1041:: with SMTP id h1mr2237356vsq.153.1560486344898; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:25:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Edwin Ancaer Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:26:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bus error while creating a port for GNUStep renaissance To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EA47E82A90 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Aue0DR2u; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eancaer@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=eancaer@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.4.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; IP_SCORE(-0.59)[ip: (2.56), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.16), asn: 15169(-2.31), country: US(-0.06)]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.70)[-0.703,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:25:47 -0000 Hello all, sorry to bother you again, but I was wondering why nobody noticed my message. Please do not take this in a negative way, but I would really appreciate your feedback, one letter is enough: A. The answer is obvious. If you cannot find it yourself, you should not be doing this. Continue reading the porters handbook. B. This is the wrong mailing list C. Your mail is totally unclear, we cannot do annything for you if you don't give a clearer explanation. D. So much to do, so little time.... We just cannot help everybody. Bad luck nobody is interested in GNUstep. E. None of the above: what is wrong with your question is: ... Kind regards, Edwin Ancaer Op vr 31 mei 2019 om 08:17 schreef Edwin Ancaer : > Hello, > > I try to build a PACKAGE for GNUStep renaissance, a framework for > creating portable user interfaces. > > The poudriere testport command gives me the error below: > > ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) > Warning: 'GNUstep/System/Library/Libraries/libRenaissance.so.0.9.0' is not > stripped consider trying INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip or using ${STRIP_CMD} > Warning: > 'GNUstep/System/Applications/GSMarkupLocalizableStrings.app/GSMarkupLocalizableStrings' > is not stripped consider trying INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip or using > ${STRIP_CMD} > Warning: 'GNUstep/System/Applications/GSMarkupBrowser.app/GSMarkupBrowser' > is not stripped consider trying INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip or using > ${STRIP_CMD} > ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) > ===> Parsing plist > ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist > ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR > ===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) > =>> Checking for staging violations... done > =================================================== > ===> Building package for renaissance- > Child process pid=66023 terminated abnormally: Bus error > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/renaissance > build of devel/renaissance | renaissance- ended at Wed May 29 09:39:04 > CEST 2019 > build time: 00:01:55 > !!! build failure encountered !!! > [00:02:04] Error: Build failed in phase: package > [00:02:04] Cleaning up > [00:02:04] Unmounting file systems > > I think it has something to do with the way I create the port files, > because I built other packages, even GNUStep ones, without problems. > > I'm a beginner with FreeBsd, with poudriere..., and I'm completely stuck > now. > Could somebody here point me in the right direction. In case you need > them, I attached the Makefile, pkg-descr, pkg-plist and distinfo I created. > > Thanks for helping, > > Edwin Ancaer > > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 04:34:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E783E15C5B2D for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7798682E2D for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1hbdvM-0004zb-I3; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:34:48 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:34:48 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Edwin Ancaer Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bus error while creating a port for GNUStep renaissance Message-ID: <20190614043448.GH5902@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:34:52 -0000 Hi! > sorry to bother you again, but I was wondering why nobody noticed my > message. It's because we are all *very* busy 8-}, sorry for the delay. As far as I understand, you prepared a new port, devel/renaissance, and have problems during the build. I failed to notice that you attached the port files to your first mail, I'm testing them right now. I'll get back to you in a few days. One hint: Please use portlint -AC to test if the port is fine. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 One year to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 05:16:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D1D15C667A for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76BB83CA8 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1hbeZu-00053n-N7; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:16:42 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:16:42 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Edwin Ancaer , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bus error while creating a port for GNUStep renaissance Message-ID: <20190614051642.GI5902@home.opsec.eu> References: <20190614043448.GH5902@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190614043448.GH5902@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:16:44 -0000 Hi! > I failed to notice that you attached the port files to your first > mail, I'm testing them right now. I'll get back to you > in a few days. After cleaning up the Makefile from the portlint-warnings, it builds just fine on current@r348454M. You can fine my version at https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/renaissance/ So, if you have that coredump, on what version of FreeBSD/poudriere/etc ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 One year to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 06:33:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A30415C7B2D for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D55859D4 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x5E6Wt3S041170 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:32:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: FireFox and NFSv4 To: Freddie Cash Cc: freebsd-ports References: <08924a7b-d2dc-468e-493d-472487344698@netfence.it> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:32:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 73D55859D4 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mailserver.netfence.it]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.960,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.31)[ip: (-3.93), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-1.97), asn: 30722(-0.72), country: IT(0.05)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:33:05 -0000 On 6/13/19 5:56 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > Seems to be a known issue with NFS storage of the .mozilla folder that's > made worse with NFSv4: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428169 > > Has to do with file locking and race conditions in the multi-process > setup, and using SQLite databases for everything. > > There's a couple of workaround listed in there (see comment 29) that > work for most people. Thanks a lot. I see it's fixed in 63, but I'm still using 60.x ESR. I'll look into this out of curiosity when I have time, but probably 68ESR will be out by then :) bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 10:58:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FFA15CCFCA for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197258D685 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CE5D015CCFC7; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4E115CCFC6 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54F138D67F for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986361D97D for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5EAwaER063144 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:36 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5EAwaEE063134; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:36 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201906141058.x5EAwaEE063134@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:36 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:38 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/freefilesync | 9.8 | 10.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 17:17:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD4515AD26D for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654FB72333 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 290AD15AD26C; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1507415AD26B for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A535572332 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F22EF1 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5EHHBOC046560 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:11 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5EHHB3V046559 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:11 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:11 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201906141717.x5EHHB3V046559@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 13.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:17:14 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-13 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.emulators --- echo: write error on stdout [...] --- describe.emulators --- ===> emulators/wxmupen64plus failed *** [describe.emulators] Error code 1 make[2]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports --- describe.devel --- ===> devel/fpc-pthreads failed *** [describe.devel] Error code 1 make[2]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports make[2]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports 2 errors Committers on the hook: amdmi3 jbeich kai matthew pkubaj yuri Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U sysutils/pcbsd-libsh/pkg-descr A math/boolector A math/boolector/Makefile A math/boolector/distinfo A math/boolector/files A math/boolector/files/patch-CMakeLists.txt A math/boolector/files/patch-src_CMakeLists.txt A math/boolector/pkg-descr A math/boolector/pkg-plist U math/Makefile A math/btor2tools A math/btor2tools/Makefile A math/btor2tools/distinfo A math/btor2tools/files A math/btor2tools/files/patch-configure.sh A math/btor2tools/pkg-descr U mail/dcc-dccd/Makefile U games/netradiant/Makefile A print/libraqm/files A print/libraqm/files/patch-src_raqm.c U graphics/gimp-app/Makefile U graphics/libjxr/files/patch-jxrlib_warnings U graphics/py-pillow/Makefile U devel/p5-B-C/Makefile U devel/py-pytest-helpers-namespace/Makefile UU devel/py-pytest-helpers-namespace/distinfo U devel/py-cerberus/Makefile U devel/py-cerberus/distinfo U Mk/bsd.gecko.mk U www/firefox/Makefile A www/firefox/files/patch-bug1559213 U databases/phpmyadmin/Makefile U databases/phpmyadmin/distinfo U security/vuxml/vuln.xml Updated to revision 504172. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jun 14 21:37:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E0A15B1C53 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A9581FDF for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 417C315B1C4F; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CAF15B1C4E for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E0C81FDE for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD07E3377 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5ELbYap057164 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:34 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5ELbQvX057123 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:26 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:26 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201906142137.x5ELbQvX057123@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:37:40 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- *** [describe.devel] Error code 1 make[2]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports make[2]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports 1 error Committers on the hook: adamw amdmi3 danfe gerald jbeich kai ler linimon madpilot mat matthew pkubaj skozlov swills tobik yuri Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U devel/Makefile A devel/genie A devel/genie/Makefile A devel/genie/distinfo A devel/genie/files A devel/genie/files/patch-build_gmake.freebsd_genie.make A devel/genie/files/patch-src_actions_make_make__cpp.lua A devel/genie/files/patch-src_host_scripts.c A devel/genie/pkg-descr U devel/gn/Makefile U devel/msgpack/Makefile U devel/lab/Makefile U devel/lab/distinfo A devel/ocaml-result A devel/ocaml-result/Makefile A devel/ocaml-result/distinfo A devel/ocaml-result/pkg-descr A devel/ocaml-result/pkg-plist U devel/libestr/pkg-descr U Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk U games/kobodeluxe/Makefile U games/fishsupper/Makefile U games/einstein/Makefile U games/wop/Makefile U games/meandmyshadow/Makefile U editors/nedit/Makefile U sysutils/google-compute-engine-oslogin/Makefile A sysutils/google-compute-engine-oslogin/files A sysutils/google-compute-engine-oslogin/files/patch-bin_google__oslogin__control U www/py-html5-parser/Makefile U www/py-html5-parser/distinfo U x11/menulibre/Makefile UU x11/menulibre/distinfo UU x11/menulibre/pkg-plist U x11/xfce4-screensaver/Makefile U x11/xfce4-screensaver/distinfo D x11/xfce4-screensaver/files/patch-src_gs-listener-dbus.c U x11/libexo/Makefile U x11/libexo/distinfo U x11/libexo/pkg-plist U graphics/ocaml-images/files/patch-src_tiffwrite.c U graphics/peruse/Makefile U databases/mantis/files/pkg-message.in U databases/mantis/Makefile U databases/mantis/distinfo U net/intel-em-kmod/Makefile U net/intel-em-kmod/distinfo U mail/dcc-dccd/Makefile Updated to revision 504199. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 15 00:09:19 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD8215B4F40 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1556E85DB6 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CA01A15B4F3F; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B708515B4F3E for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4775D85DB5 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C874B91 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5F09Huu087356 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:17 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5F09HQ0087354 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:17 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:17 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201906150009.x5F09HQ0087354@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:09:19 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 15 00:26:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC5915B5549 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9E9864E6 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7365415B5548; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9D615B5547 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD81864E4 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D614E61 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5F0QZfV017100 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:35 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5F0QZPf017098 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:35 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:35 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201906150026.x5F0QZPf017098@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 13.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:26:38 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 15 08:07:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6397515BFF65 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72EF6C1E3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:07:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: matthew/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45889B276 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:07:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4fa:e28f:7504:7fca]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23AD3A40F for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/23AD3A40F; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral To: FreeBSD Ports ML From: Matthew Seaman Subject: Anyone want to take over these ports? Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=matthew@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFJIL80BEADi7/VbnnErDU6pjEhI/SzEZ/HbDRkJ5g7HroAtqIRm6nj8ZwOAgZ/2ZnWn 5F+fXTuLsG0FLNtkd17FoVcuCi5e/GPliXI5cmamV7E1Yz4T8UsJ7RQolimyxVexccKd16Tc AA7B9bFlJSKkBUSD0buj7VjT07xWhRzu6Vgi5r0UjLALYJz977uZA0F1aOGOXREDEAOhdcNc kSNjynqAwDA6dCT1Elpi4key1fYjv4jyDF+GU/YXul2Y/rguA8FCkHd9vyym5eAsLQ5mG00V V9fkEHIpH5KorNVnl/ufHXnkZqmHAZVpFDcrshb7aZ/pL45PXyWgLj+e6etelgj3a2bZi0JF cVdXCnBZVP2oIyYblM11ugTbfCwodORU8a5KfPeztMdAtDr4e+32NTrPdPi5rLT+GUsYz+PL 3A3m3u8bdsFp40DlIrBtSByVjqERxcfhphrEB4J8BXHUG7OAtXkZMlW/PGKDwXJq0O6Z5Tcg YHAoEiSWbXiexHgXNJyP+sqnIlhLWhSJGeJ+C83wqI6oYlZUCW00NkPxcIHnQPV/z+5wQVci TMyaWC2YCIHz4Ljs+TnwWMz0E8PNFDfHVbQ0W4PRGV7gRAqxfL+yKufauIEGbEq8rNDbSwL3 bcUCxR4ZDlaUEUwT4J8naf7rjdgiEYHs2Ig3jeK1+ER4FPG1sQARAQABtDBNYXR0aGV3IFNl YW1hbiA8bS5zZWFtYW5AaW5mcmFjYW5pbm9waGlsZS5jby51az6JAlcEEwEKAEECGwMFCwkI BwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4ACGQEWIQRyz6whebywJLW1RZADb2ye5/OevwUCWttU4QUJ DFmAlAAKCRADb2ye5/Oevwb5EACipbOazgwl5IbqkQI4gELpCh5dqDASS9DQqAD35n/cI91P 0lrYcdyCQbOXadQi5bswnP4AcJqX83mITXbcApDdxVxHujw7VODI069eV3/I9Qz72mHYYAAj w0CHNx4bKED2YCSVS6+jV5hq2sywNEUxL+4I218Oc+IsLts62m4tQ8UxX9fQ2H1kQOvdrYpj x7je5qJX/yujLc+9WWZ8ZBSdP/HVJUEdRgQotwAlgfMp3mRQEE73MAJisG/olj/dSxd+oHIP NbJt1yxMqhZekuEGqZpm3tWvqYgpGcEXdhphJSxeK6oLpTLghuAb7/WdOBrpfL7c2OQYBgOw DK+7Io9NBt/d/rCxL39jmUONW8ohrhnNQ2SALnyYTvZgruxA4tXxOOyM9up0/8mB5E8YC9ML 5YuxRPNTXYeWCexa0zktnkCgT7PhS33evf5gsA0B9Snv7TFCFN9adPAdHlsppZIWfTHDG8e2 Jik8PmvsUG34XNif5k6Ui3++2ZA8ZoKvOyLeomuno1hN8yk1APw8SbX1SPNz9UVbl8W/YgGj 3GhYOuQt4HcMiLyTby6R4lC4nsBaHS1MX+57f6Zxzf2wNjSKxiJK9qS7azbu/GxpafNhbz1Z +iUDIaJkRWA1Gs8C7SMcfVsI5zDtvqHGYtTCgooVMYJ6vRyB68M4bljUYMxRTrkCDQRSUUGj ARAAsPHwcnupWuOqYbboiYwZnd6dNRSUzMxIXN8vkdkrDfw7DvV9WYuAC9IGJ310N0otfh9A zGDiCPRbKl0YayJ2BIgsFzyAavA/kCCRLP5hMZ1mKkZ4K8Fs16EvtmarzPibSBfDQ0wcwzNf nSL2gZVG1JwRHHZ9TtiUsuAIh0R/qRh9+8AcFkS5Pfxb1PzJC/YuWOdlj6cO58u+2FfmNiGm oB6kl1LahmbtGgO8GRInkOYUYlWSUAA4Flw4FzWHBkEGv/STAp++KAZu2Tdl5UZH9iXm+Hsf 4sqt+/ILJketmO2RK2o2ECVwE2a/hQdOjjqmcscd1M5znweKSCk6dR/K4Cv05bZ7KVRCm2vK vuEBpltm/43/ls7OnFwz1UVswX9ch9t5tgSwbGxtTWJ/Mr3ybCz0EE4WaJBI8HTuVZWaJwXM ozz26BZCOV56flkZjDuyRhvRjZG+QhdbbumBDpa6wu3MCjSG8wn4RlNjuQdjDCo6bdqyovGg f8RW6UNCmStZkpTZYZfs8MTEcltmaFiJQjnY39pWa+Fp0aWwcwOVlAkp2wX6FzQeIEbPW515 vAlCjXneJIN7jss4Y2QJtFFQaCw0c+NloESFFhCLvYBhMPf2kccnDu25VRupkLp6njQs94Nf jtSb8mzOa2EhAHY81pRfdetOPosi23P6zIGKLXkAEQEAAYkEuwQYAQoAJgIbAhYhBHLPrCF5 vLAktbVFkANvbJ7n856/BQJa21VJBQkMUG8mAonBvSAEGQEKAGYFAlJRQaNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1M0E2OEI5 MTNBNEU2Q0YzRTFFMTMyNkJCMjNBRjUxOEUxQTQwMTMACgkQuyOvUY4aQBNlUBAAlCLRtOug Y70Q3lkGsFSNJZm9oqPJGorOsH+emDdsiZSe5Ut5P2MG+XlIofQOfxvupltzw2pFuJOvHEMS 0rod6lLJ6joInhf0ZQH3P6jF/d2Y8iR9+2nqBtUf27OsHVLRMd/5WHVgyMjjyNBq0urIdv4E wV8Y9CDtGBGeiYyMstaBxHdEH+oM9VZB92lv485p4V8t8k1BgNn7UjQzOMBlITAB7WsUcXGi zTjMMe1tX/IT+f00I4PWAn3w5q8ldvtsWf+muVpIaGpZBMrxBEPxYBD3WGMxiymthQQxgZAB 03GatfLjzixld5Zn8WuGiPOxOTBkJAudhxPvfkO+3jgLGSa7TN46HgNH36OdeEr4SMdspR0i 0lmW1hwHmpmyw3XYLy4BwmhuV9z1XQN3qab8FBxOpxcCxnbO4HoDgXAahQbRNSA7umzz+I7S UcZVnCCG3hCG4BLxklZhBw4RmUtRHiL8vu+MPKrcBnbZ8uJ2s3E6mhB0yM0UnA3pYhAysgwB q3n9jLYN0atzVmHL8Fxjyc7z1EJPgqFdfHfMYl/eLYmCuGNfMsSGlH9O7tWoE10qkDlLmNB7 jbiJNgTf9rc50QKKUqumqp4a1UMEnt+7yf//JqUD7Jf0iJrglLgUyPKSY5te9rJqHPy1wIXT 6pChY5ic8jmtXKsCZaaxL8rEsq0JEANvbJ7n856/RNkQAKiZK5wNuRyNJS21MUJxnP7biEW4 1QuGhV/7Ryw5XXIor8H7SZHCnVR1fCYnJWRwRYn0SyZGoERW/57rgibf8/gkPw741AkCKOhL TDNgvNriEjfWj3I0X6M90AZXhcnGVJTS/moV65g4lUo6jX1GiJyTCD4b9SLyNDzPgiWO2I3W R+Xf/W81PK1820CN7HpIZUrLfGF+Nr6kXUxeOeSpi7ZMB/p3e7ZSzY0Lp7PFqGfL9N1Jg26X 8DVaf/Em0AorutLx84DqqMfO02ySaCq0B83VYzbNB3Ascy4c2JNIvwMiyUbsOEzDKkqB3sYb 0iJtnty9DKvMaLps00eM1+GcYpLsspY4NZQeJTVC+WetRqzFM4k2JH1q3hwymYgIsxDam6kn U3m0bN19WLQYmS5HLPZbkmtpm3P49g6KLFxZHzklS7x8VUOMJ3O97xXScBC9bePB3tqQRDSs wX3YmIywTYVInEeFleNaXH3UoS3Dhw7KP3i/BNreWDM+oZhbc2OkgWzQzXfT+l17EcP9/xML 0CIgM/cJPwMOrKrdqgfL6zAYDUK0IGFgRoxgnAbnpPHCr7ykrELNLbGtnzchzCxnbIyrSVAb m+Dm5MnjQRiNFXbuvpkuVVFqo6a0OhX1cwTuCIzSEfSggRaOOEqXTk559dDOXDqVx9lVKniK vbGzkmhAuQINBFJRQiABEADC0axEKC09VCYGgsH20lUwtAXd6VUVCNENBlW+MXQYsKfCLqO+ XP6vM0pA+sSswaBeSB/Eu3XgdKhuYGKHqAOo4wyKvwk3h9IWmgVNMM8ZQFi/PP2ya56/tuWZ 7kkG2M2OfWQpnBHa97wSN0KWDjZHrQXQMggDq5EqimNc2+hFaB2zIGrP0tjXVrHLJEmJRLq2 ugTxpGKLlNOtBNEsWmiN+MafXpKM6HLDq1scCvrhRICheBsnGtcyGaErwpjNaLA70I0+B552 DfTj+PICOGCMnp4jlP6rmVG7RifZoE5DrkcdTim/IU0pLaO/Epts5lwDodEOW9CKQFH8dswT bp6xhKJf+y1dIwhoOIkEUspoME3rgLtn72+QQW4jw/4pjA7MQu9VOF9bUN/nxTfyn/Rct3Bq sBZPJURdorewPgoBsPxMaA7t8JRoRyuVwXGMacw+wdmv2lldsdUOGokSCB596FoXAcKWndiY dgNjMWJaODy2va9Vlv65hGQRXWcoI2ytMCSwSzslly+V+0jo0ZWoUpd+6BuYRvG1QUW5/Fco aPPJsr/UfU0jzg6bCAw/xw1nuGaiZTqNiNjklrGIKyi0UyY28DGGADn3j9obY7pOrI9nFicc NtxURyhmgHP9tiTYNTVaGPyJh+WV3ZH/Yb7TStZadLoWb5vXAs0DQj+qnQARAQABiQI8BBgB CgAmAhsMFiEEcs+sIXm8sCS1tUWQA29snufznr8FAlrbVUkFCQxQbqkACgkQA29snufznr9M zBAAvn4C8wWYyiObQbqgaAm8GjqlSi0lGEv7ydmcu2ElAAyD0dnxbEMKEGgBpQumGD8/1pdZ FYw3EIKWiazpvMVw+6fFz9GZdviuM1refUYm3duDejaNoH75zmIG9LRTOJ6RBkPd3oQznT40 X5K+ARqLaJDPAzjb6DH7HYINlvNvf89M4CVN0gofv7dcCqtBTF8CtXB3iG0cFAis/12PwpfH 3YzWq529jnJJCLChTD5eEBi2JNLzQRHMeqy8D4Bnkb+Ahkwgbzs5GXGYaXoZeyFKThTAK/sg eJ9Cz15azfKW+EWMUOcvCurqz2QajlLe04N9mU4vPp92VTo274CtfIg/shSguYXnEZ0I/sz3 VFn3Kn2bRYeRu6PyusNUsQ397Uw5wDVmqzQqz+MnOkP6xAJjOvnD05cdj17G4rJ8gTgmzDSA 6v0AfzhUygy6Qf0UgrWrFaFIL4zQWsp9sap/QTMm92SBhLOE/Kc7nkkueEeVp0TtbkWByxLq 77Gbp0m4iZB8zylaac118hY+/vJ87aTuKF4CiCcezaI5FMg8/VVczO7/LV/n8Uu8QUOYEatR cfOB2JNXxpI/LqXVzvXpUidJbwpXY2aZprgzGhahBocuRL9jY8qp4in5CkhyU+rZyHkpQMHI +i45KRHO5GDSDMQcDF2LYGRbDUMg7G1MYTJwzsG5Ag0EUkgvzQEQANi5h27KsPhVw6AKlUo8 htPapW7b4RS26/z2pJe1IJ+lejrD5LveuRxdO3V+5hxqdBMEYNuQRmOlgsjiXkM5XFIgBeEF VGBaDv5yKPZXNfqIJC2nNehcR+rWHq84yrVb/MAvEvfQTvn3GeCTDd51xYnZYVO0An44TLLe 9cKL/i5d4I7flz/NK4DMpSqBRs0z7Tj9uF22LtYDJhNnQPolF4f+ADRLGMsbNHpCKwLcuzCR NlWN+eTY9peGZEfDoJT39u4wdg2ut9aSTv3B+l5HHkfYSS2gNf5yQ3YOVbQp/D6vZvNBCS0n Y5G5ApFil2ZAdoqfllqeQ74eH/dEPqOK1LCiBznKPHoLvTAJgA9v+Lhb9qw1jbIVD56Y88ZW c2iONscDlN2dboAYXGu3pcc8KNFkfc/j3MKRfq6N2l+t/n4ueebtLZypDJ3v9X7cQAkaW90R DhEuPpvvd+MEZGDYH3ZtIokqXZ3G3yiAy4M4TGXg4jX2pQ8ccXciimcp3DaXvqcV/SKnF20Q l6lm0r9sNp8ZBWUkLeMnDnpMdSjlONGuG9TsM50gaDi+kJuy9/fnlA0UGMpQNmBc1wsNAHl/ Q3ObZHUQtsZZN0gYEusDHpNC87SHodMS5YTc/eKx02asEoIoue/vUejkI6dvHWZv93+13y3c ZBhHyfF6SEr5dNkjABEBAAGJAjwEGAEKACYCGwwWIQRyz6whebywJLW1RZADb2ye5/OevwUC WttVSQUJDFmA/AAKCRADb2ye5/Oev9SOD/48JvgAf/PkjW0+TTE5vDaqdlEmNBu3K/vFX4T7 u0YT+qzLGUGYUvISiti9Dl7dV8kTg/Yr20EbHpj2a1Iys03YbR3mn/p6dv9abyqkaSESHN/g PPk1rlEi/j3lyoQsjDN6bpBEwT7Kbgri+Lwtkwp0vGm8I5AOguGlnCuNqsJ2jnHJ6YnEaKKp imIkr8wJVWxmx0OfnZxWrhMr5txD2DG675r1/IyOkU6SnApoD15+fJQmrsSmCKo3cZUMvM5Q 9lUJgdKuC89jJ1NujCzk7SC/EP6xSW0KFGzpqK0leIfh1riQ8DNs9CWreLANKtq35qbDUeGy BHwki0krsRRuNfg+0c+Rc5XOl+vuGmwfblKguIkAKSMSsjslXHqom+9s+mhOqJUSjAHsazlL BkVn00DfooDQBeeOwDlRwmQi+xcV3FomZMf5+4ARmsfzGtRIiJp5pfjek/P9vjeW+UqlE2az teXCmaK0G2LaLVVNnJzrUVQAqpA5eMtd3Ay8IGlhbrfznmAplgUH0aYhR1twIbUF8MeyQYIH fofR+lOnp3/vufJFZWve4S6tbK/OA69+Xr4wKAG95XBw03qZtPFbWu9yk5AYuS02U4akBhFv NfSx4Bs2rcrXZh63VBrlNqecueJdOQiQuY6nGoUa5fiE9glZF5ib9PVa522bBwaI2mW1tbkC DQRSUUKTARAAt6FH3HbDFoumOWUuJlDgOQs3wdp2n3IKv7gqzbDdgaoWW7hDTvjO0Cb6p2PG UKEoxMQQoIdDO0pQ9rgr4Sh4VSVC9WMO/fUwqdrIs2nACIg4OwvNhIccW08S+N72f+yuXWOQ /dv79cwruE26/BEXgIP09MYcOWwcUCXzOoUR3er+jzcsN9uFjcsBVUJLIEru1askHRzCUa5P 9S9GAFBwN49HC5IJWEzdLP27FjjOG5UG3+QZahHrjG1i6S3bIYXtaGsqNyfkp9Is7Wpj2kk+ s9Ua+YMG/V5YVlbANIexa1yr75p1W9biqXpCWnB3TaHSfI0G1t9w8K2qhR/Z1/YLIcRzZ2aH JnvbzJYw5Cs1jfNpFytbASsxj0rbReouftlBvVWFRxsZ+oG1ZXL64/SVKMZAnfBNxd1uajp+ HtoQtYoTu88la6zcdnAhOD5JdOntN2VF8iQnDfPgkidfuSZ1C059xaRPTSRJBgMRDtOlDxgz 7Pxx/7L2jwxRY1dq6NGioflY7CCpGc7bi1K6xnf3lBL8X2nGpRAVsg9Lx1ShIWkgNbTAcPXp XcXlJ1xqz8HS8Twadh6gIfk/RNchBIED9lkVCKHYp/XQb8T8vMwn/kTWUm5WlPkQUFQN4D1b 6+dJw4bwn/wiRS8did1MU1OytJB6tljfEUCx0uKkzqr+33MAEQEAAYkEuwQYAQoAJgIbAhYh BHLPrCF5vLAktbVFkANvbJ7n856/BQJa21VJBQkMUG42AonBvSAEGQEKAGYFAlJRQpNfFIAA AAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5 RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0YzMDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp5OdNFg// ZqeVdGoKkMvALPzZjGz84+6l0kcMxSN4TfWmec0YpSmDEzCw4/SZoGqHlZb8lcTevmNrNXg6 c+wVw6P+Ycl20Nzb98Kt9C5sz+zGVmPPK+3O9gaPnEqlIKnnbxKXXNHQdd8Mf0UTpifMqX0I kWOqhe/tQKGoQ9+feKvLIaToIe/NjosW6vJ9YAgFqZ0015zwbElhMNFmgDMOI2SgjBZ9ngP1 U82Mqb7/7G9GxHtnwuJBSnPJgN8tav2O9uWPC0N8deyZBH4y9ERBPTFMc46wjkW030olcq7g 4hZ55rpPIEyGQZCq4u1gGibbiQJZEyUQT7BJm70/PeUr3uNjPlQODV/lF5TBvqGHEmlSQfo6 Yb/QQx07CK9bvhUSO2XP3ybS8JwoMZlgZzZcjiPiQF9ot6152/Cp/XrsKgtk+fg5ARZpyywR lQk1JCHRZvhgXIxqNYA04uwdPFcLI4vPiDaLS8mhXHLRZsSpHmIBqqrnam5Lq7iDc39UZrSJ MM40oy3iAOI2B7AOCbzxRuEplJd3E/tEqrnFGcPVN+h52ka74lEyfkwA2RrASWJJcXLN3/Vs izEj8okepefzjU/UPnU8sirzeWWo8Z4uKddovk//NwAPUJbee4vZLjYE6MWdpEoZP9CZXbtI PWuc9Djg16aHOgv44JPokDMaHA27A4rw2KwJEANvbJ7n856/SPkP/1bGUde7lnRTNd8c0ZrU tEi+OOibKyh7BjLUpzlihj3rGl9ljAF0eCdBrL1We3MDDcyi+XO7VZLiecZTlG6LLXFvEFjY pyPRx3bXlWk1/ahEiBoLWxedseNdFrO+H5XX6ODmKFFLhXgpsXnAxtM6Mxmrx0CGW4qzfUi7 Vsqj86gqlcet0/k5RqPMAhrGX5fNnQNWSAwumeFKM8UgDpKY0u7M2tS07B0ozXOSpqGTSJhX 6Ld2Nl95CL3wbSGuh1pDUOysAnzK5Rl/OQ9LtYpWomAKg6yn7gKYij5XmekAg/E+ybr5Gyx2 PgMQUGtuNmBRWP1qKtVUbrOekiuNz7kpdrP7M2O7i/cxWjGpVtjDNWuGkFgY3c+sKKawBma8 1K4rg044nkGwFX98vfEHVGu+HOd3D+Mv47nv4LQvzynBG/YflwaPmLhpw7HCPvpa4W7y8+5A KxDqWlM2NvrLwmwbmz9dQMGtjnNRm4uHfPX8AyzBoMtDrxNLIvDYlLqh+G2Q1shNNNdRNXn9 Z1pvri6KAHmH9GlISuM/jQfItout+Gtx9QUlNX3aIsdScTLA3jnMOpHcALCGI+XMiBNaVuYU xHgHh+MNYhmjQZZqASBCvVj1HyibDPZa/iQ4DBGBRlJb+8saPPqYVDQhosWSF20aJKwepZII OFjpMgmCIqZAnqK4uQINBFJRQrgBEADUWFag56O3CaycayGght1rYWYz7P9/3s7OlqAuEAId 8/kSz8jXzAb/Qb6t0247a2MD0gxnjgZQy2OiQOsOTrc31L6tUrLVATL5Q3oKIh9hOlNMA+cR jsgY3UmMaSw+Gftp64EJDBQwBXWT7CSUEJw4PqzwMPiTHRkmqQfzdfNagFJVqZ0e+cznoLzI 9WvkccwLW1kicBYEysX5yOXUQ9/PcKqRWcbxLFznJ16JsxL1DeUct5WRWUxECY2rM0t+AkNR a3NpzskiMUSzFhiGmJo9yyy1RS4drjMhEn/IcM1sO21ZF/WWuUVkul65qngFnaFDDRQ5lU3A agWhLhmppmK/yabSVfqz38B1APoBWuldYprslTbAOJrL2xFtiH7m9VYbP2aGdwr9V/C27kiN Wnm/lYzP9Z+dTFkxw2V+BOjiLWzDDD6pEE7YDhiPyoopadOyXtoJf3aK1OI+DBu3piBA/CDD DvavruM+3mjxUxcOo8w8rMaJzDUDLG0yOyhKWef3UW5ly3CKXe8+m/MZe0GavNBJt0ObLQpP mnn9b2kP/xS0ssszo8uzlfSMiGi9AedAoRQ7vFXfI0MBb0M8gJ6Ht/+j1b5Al9ABeeA3PRuu +aBJwBRdFp4AV5BsCa0Qb3aqVJUPuBvtY56aWWB9sSfQ1qeu/loRxkJbHhaPJswscQARAQAB iQI8BBgBCgAmAhsMFiEEcs+sIXm8sCS1tUWQA29snufznr8FAlrbVUkFCQxQbhEACgkQA29s nufznr+YBw//TJtAC9d/FYQQHKQg/QOEkcAL8Qx4HA2SICnhKqv64jPcYIUYocOO8Qayh+IV Da6MGkbsWdweUFuexMsW+17dqETfQjUApx32TUwF44WgIEfARLW2zRdRcXfsT4A2sQJCvNJr JnH3lywiJi+V848Q4sC3sSJREpcJd07oc2jxSKZyYZ1DBPfK1MyiwcBt2uFCTXdyFMham2aY LDP2JYvFP08tjTUAIKhe4B0bPTtldCf5sH5q8xrpaHnKHf0n7qMmK7NtGW/9R6WiCruiNsLn O95fms1tzKKfA4QXIYCEWl8XsRKwp51HZDjQu/KxPsjm6BL4eThnae9t3Zs5J0LiPxoFbN+p W7anft3YCeezB8+gus7I1Rn5yJMRyYRRVHtZZTBDQfoDqHgLY14GYtFGOT0IR/OuAzYM1CoM vVExgqVWixDwF5RH1OHO1TANqTGcrRm1lvasCWIphpoQVtkN4/PXGa+NhzsRmr/c5OUYxQNr oE8cdsK8mOIBRz9D2JpF7d2nr1X+vA4zk2JL61aCnc62BfSYNZWhCcOPJZUhFT9BqAkew0kk JzQ3jwHGAhfcfozTHoFsD08qAW0OUriEtH+EOXl+dYbjlNUjFPjJu49cZbtp/1TpsYOBdME1 QLM1TPanYXa7tb+IrRZN+Oi9i9VVym16DK7q21k3j0qRC0s= Message-ID: <78a6e3a4-76ef-a79b-15a3-5a3abb1bb743@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 09:07:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vYTM9qaHN0GrMdSXBdjFyjMxIUU0CzTl7" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B72EF6C1E3 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:2610:1c1:1::/48, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:07:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vYTM9qaHN0GrMdSXBdjFyjMxIUU0CzTl7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="OausIhHWNWdR3z0p9JMKcyrrjTgbrxVej"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: FreeBSD Ports ML Message-ID: <78a6e3a4-76ef-a79b-15a3-5a3abb1bb743@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Anyone want to take over these ports? --OausIhHWNWdR3z0p9JMKcyrrjTgbrxVej Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, I should have done this years ago, but I am an extremely skilled prevaricator and it seems that only now is finally the time... MySQL is no-longer part of my life, so I'd like to off-load some MySQL related ports: databases/mysql-connector-java databases/mysql-connector-java51 databases/phpmyadmin These are sufficiently high-profile / security sensitive that I don't feel that just reassigning them to ports@ is the right thing to do. So, would anyone like to take over one or more of these ports? Fair warning: phpmyadmin is a security-advisory magnet[*]. There have been 4 so far this year, and that is quite a lot fewer than usual. Cheers, Matthew [*] Or perhaps cesspool. --OausIhHWNWdR3z0p9JMKcyrrjTgbrxVej-- --vYTM9qaHN0GrMdSXBdjFyjMxIUU0CzTl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEGfFU7L8RLlBUTj8wAFE/EOCp5OcFAl0Epy1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5 RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0YzMDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp 5OckqhAAtU8TdSktdYJ2XSA7BmMF1Kn7yJwPFKYz6RVyY1tgleEHu76duJnzSOdu 2vPFCq9HsTQMzSI3gGQHoo5PDuIF+R+dQM8vnz48Jwxpxm7jISd6EoaubE3ItXvJ yGwpx4C176xNeMGtr8llAi0RVUyROtOizxGdP6SRzeEJRVSfsrXsmVLa2nvFT05q 72ts7Fr1BG3082sthGEXBMu6N8hqYuSZnMrGsA14j3sccMS6ZoaUQgpk6GssY0XV 4vVcCuDDVHqEHJClx2vtoaOCCO3pMJQib4mfwxPDXUDMmG9s0qfayO2MbmyvVub7 ZMKZ8FfkX9JW4HtYenu9+TC4RFlIQLDSHykpDWIrc/r5snoDDLcd/dOiTkW93l60 wTVCfSPbR8Y78vG2mt0J3RZ2gfa2kFN3dJ/3W0zHQ1HHFsAJG9uU9BmQ0vj1eFvA YI5h3vOIcR5N9D2/ot3Mpet6dYFCcN1zy+smy32rOcC+5gI9u1xvtFvnwudrDvCp Hpbyq6kfnj3YvcYTkd7cysp67DRUDiIzdBIgbnUw2ZFa6e+lTawVCtc9Q5QLSJkW QUM2lObuhMqaGhj05H5LcZTuN6FC0WYcku3Qaq0RABnYGcTgi5gGhczplWbaiPUQ 7NjLMERIBo6l3Pt1n1jHgn5dI9YA3/WZ8hp+v5Ux03wK5iSH+M8= =x0Xa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vYTM9qaHN0GrMdSXBdjFyjMxIUU0CzTl7-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 15 08:38:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DFE15C0A5D for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF7C6D110 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D0E1B15C0A5C; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD75815C0A5B for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AEAA6D108 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CADD948E for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5F8c5ba084606 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:05 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5F8c51B084605; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:05 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201906150838.x5F8c51B084605@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:05 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:38:07 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/pg_dirtyread | 2.0 | 2.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/minitube | 2.9 | 3.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks.