From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 13 06:09:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB76E5EDD for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46rWW31smdz4Z1C for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3E3BAE5ED7; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E056E5ED6 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46rWW30zHVz4Z12 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE20618A7A for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9D69owM069274; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:50 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201910130609.x9D69owM069274@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:50 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:09:51 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ cad/admesh | 0.98.3 | v0.98.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/gnatcross-binutils-aarch64 | 2.27 | 2.33.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/castget | 1.2.4 | 2.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 13 14:57:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082B4FB2CE for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46rlCK19whz40PY for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7F3130A8 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:56:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C56C737E18; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:56:44 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.0-rc at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:56:17 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20191013.235617.372028519971522804.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange build error of java/openjdk12 with poudriere and 13-CURRENT jail From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <20191011.022056.604915953639995735.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20191011.022056.604915953639995735.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46rlCK19whz40PY X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.01)[0.005,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.08)[-0.077,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.22), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.11), asn: 2519(1.52), country: JP(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:57:03 -0000 From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Strange build error of java/openjdk12 with poudriere and 13-CURRENT jail Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:20:56 +0900 (JST) > While building java/openjdk12 with poudriere and 13-CURRENT jail, I > experienced strange build error, If I build it with 'poudriere > testport' then it is built successfully. > > https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/curamd64-local/2019-10-10_00h38m18s/logs/openjdk12-12.0.2+10.3.log > > But I build it with 'poudriere bulk' then it fails to build. > > https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/curamd64-local/2019-10-09_17h51m57s/logs/openjdk12-12.0.2+10.3.log I submitted bug report for this problem. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241226 Just FYI. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 14 15:58:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB89FF1FC for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46sNWx4spPz4WSC for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id b9so20386965wrs.0 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:58:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nqzRqutmS70d0Ib4rE32jF6fRr47TbSJ1kJ3mjgUoAw=; b=nOfZCW+k5aMxPFfrZl/XUmh3911IDREMMe42KEgJ5bFu2iDrf5eHuumv1NNH5mWXyT GKFpBFwbq9mzQtDpD9cX9G1cmCqaJXmKnQy7+zzDtotdwhiPsHuCyJUDEzaAr41AGJQm 3evcpZo+nDN9y6nz8ql1pM1TMda/L89ecOJfzaJcD1gC6BV2qRN5+Na5zNyzkz5dPQAu 3zvPz74eZwGmsacJXO4HmD/EEWQdm0VttqZKpjO7uNnxyar77DItQFNdizqGv8ikP2Hu jJ44CDkO7wiiSkeCp602F4xzN+kJee4guLdf9ihCdv+YeFiSvRtHhFn1kQuEuRItosjR N9Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nqzRqutmS70d0Ib4rE32jF6fRr47TbSJ1kJ3mjgUoAw=; b=AOyZIfK0opLVGiutS0roGU9qadeMjjW2d/4Nw03S0sB0GBB+ZEwks4Yol9MaO9lxWx hrdw6zJJx51PT4sBZwsuGMJui/iTZrCdRFr8eBvXwe3eeQagu6QEzelTlUJkhSslS9TY 8x9+hgvsD9HG/3qeLzTCR1LK7XmU90ryLCrVys2EnlUYOSZwLa6mkfHYo2zuDF/DqPYv 1C1Q/gOoLGlgFRqjAdG+mEyfNUMw1Y2U3OTKy8dRdijhZ0tnrccnHFYwFlq0a9UEL4HX uuWVqPdb3MGH3vjxmsRD+5BSiWfhCjcPm6I/X3y65uKFLTBYvri8u6dLMjc/0lMnlV4+ 7Qkg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUlgHOYxyeMGP/ctoy4BLN/4mG5IQ9EAujRcBTQoSiMRbffn8vk Hf+X5LrXdGEApTN/SUlog8/S8ZFyAQVUV+yVr+ESFKFX X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzL8WFilTxqNmKFO2jf/3inVqCaPFlgExupnuWe2TGcEtuKzkHsQYkGPeOuqFTBkVcfwdriG2KLRWjCBCf92Ac= X-Received: by 2002:adf:df92:: with SMTP id z18mr24878811wrl.94.1571068714746; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:58:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:58:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: www/falkon pkg missing from the repo To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46sNWx4spPz4WSC X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nOfZCW+k; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tingox@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::436 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tingox@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.13), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.86), asn: 15169(-2.12), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:58:38 -0000 A few days ago, calibre went missing from the pkg repo; this was due to an upgrade from version 3.xx to version 4.xx, so technically understandable, even if it was unfortunate for users. Today I wanted to reinstall falkon (due to some library updates, related to other packages on my system). root@kg-core2# pkg install -f falkon Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. pkg: No packages available to install matching 'falkon' have been found in the repositories What? But it's there, look: root@kg-core2# pkg info falkon falkon-3.1.0 Name : falkon Version : 3.1.0 Installed on : Wed May 1 20:26:15 2019 CEST Origin : www/falkon Architecture : FreeBSD:11:amd64 Prefix : /usr/local [cut to save lines] Freshports also confirms that the port is still active, hasn't been upgraded to a new version or something else. So, what happened to the package? In case anyone isn't totally clear on this: building support for the package system among users requires that those users can rely on that package system to be consistent, dependable and so on. Doing "pull the rug under your legs" stunts (intended or not) makes users distrust the package system; they might even go back to using ports, even if it will cost them a lot more in build time. Details: root@kg-core2# uname -a FreeBSD kg-core2.kg4.no 11.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3 #0: Mon Aug 19 21:08:43 UTC 2019 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 14 16:37:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872D4FFF2A for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46sPNr2p6Mz4YdF for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5E393FFF28; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE97FFF26; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46sPNr1qMBz4YdB; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:87d:dfc1:dc60:387d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77186A312; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 01:37:26 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Steve Wills Cc: Mathieu Arnold , FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20191014163725.ibff4boooir2xqi3@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:37:32 -0000 On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > > What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have > > a big impact on build time and ressources required for building. > > > > If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am > > glad to tell you that no, it will not be done. > > > > Now, the question is, why would someone need to have ruby flavors? > > > > The answer cannot be "because it should be fun" or "there is no reason > > there should not be". > > > > Give us a real reason about why it would be required. > > > > We have multiple versions of Ruby, we should provide the gems for each > version. Right now, there is no way for users of Ruby 2.4 to install gem > packages except to change the default ruby and then build their own > packages. We want people to have fewer reasons to build their own packages, > not more. > > We keep the latest Ruby as not default because it tends to have more bugs > and gems lag, and the older version of Ruby is available because some gems > tend to lag really badly. So, users do have legitimate reasons for using the > non-default versions of Ruby. Also, upstream supports latest and two > versions back. > > It wasn't until Ruby 2.6 was out that GitLab even supported 2.5, to give > just one example. > > So, we have those versions of Ruby, and they should be usable, and that > includes installing gems via pkg. > > There's the point that maybe we should only package gems that are needed by > other things, which I can understand, but don't know if I necessarily agree > with, because then you have users confused on what the "right" way to > install a gem is. "Oh, this one is packaged because something else in ports > needs it, so use the pkg, but this other one isn't packaged, so you have to > use gem." > > And I'd think the same applies to python modules or perl modules, etc. One > could ask, why not provide flavors for all versions of python, that is, 3.5, > 3.6 and 3.7, along with the 2.7 ones as well, but to me that doesn't seem > quite necessary because the compatibility is better there, as far as I can > tell. But, I wouldn't be opposed to it personally, if someone did make the > argument in favor of it. Same with Perl and especially things that depend on > Java. > > But that's all beside the point, really. > > Steve Hello again everyone, I'm sorry I cannot express my thoughts correctly in English and I clould not explain why flavors for Ruby required but swills explained far better than me. Based on his explanation, will it be a valid reason to introduce flavors on Ruby ports? -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 14 19:30:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F116135483 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092000011.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.0.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46sTDf0hkrz3Hxl for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WmT6iRanGecyT24V1yY3AJMIetypYZ1He40a26mo4vFc6Rw0baLqO8tyAGv6I/64wjpQOdxpxt06qHOrTLOzY8jZcWRH/gwAfvSRSB6v0GJeFi19WR6DQMQzF2uUE5A1Jyama/yhYJN4xB8CMEHWvncda4/q8UStsmzkAIrwyrUgCCBFzjWDExOav6dQ3mKLSqPMCiAcUuKs5Esr65Iu+2fQKAX+1CXJlRJoOzZ8kHVWEE+C/ls52lbnoo1zq3p7X900ALUgbx0FN8jJkH6txk5cxfsXf7HSvn1FTp6KWL4EHUpX3ogGkWNZY+3s+0qiGYBipOSwotdTtFZGgSjO5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dBNoaFtOWuAD7JacICDay0AlS+HdsCDbxP3ExwIX5U0=; b=gcuX8fph/lam7fvNKKw5KjmWMg8XG57TrMVX56ePEcBJbUYc+u9BCbekJZKGSQjZR8Cyv9HQO7VrmcByLp2Sd7A1lf/t9UCXmsoKjQRKnrVJ9B0H2M6WZdpm9l9W6/Mbxvf88L54Yr+/gAk1zysSf1Fvg6xANHaSq+HgZM5OzEJ4v590X/SCqQrioAaWlTb2BvEZzli6H5AdnUXdFnZfwhiN0rqPLI77v2a8hjZcQJkCmfqcw6OCkD215EvQrcK2ySioBE2j5sb4FGXghye/niOWaMRhxrKhylkEASZUsD9HOWJQG9eGoE+JxdD63M7dJ7IK0rT2MniTtK8mt7w7GQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dBNoaFtOWuAD7JacICDay0AlS+HdsCDbxP3ExwIX5U0=; b=VxU9DmBHxoDWH5QJCPJLmVf3b68+827c941WGQPISIrVo3hsdyLVjw57tONubzgyNpUA6IaZqCRHQeej8GN/RpaC2BNb+TyL7Eq+X/Lv7vQLptMH2FGQkNmWmRcKEkJ3cH/eARKjst8ClUVS0jbR3tt8I5X1Gl9j3W5PIE6pNWNSmZLttBgXpROXGVJq9Nm6ERofXTCovMqNkN0v3G1EV2cG4AYuAOnPht1aBmkJkxSLodP17BV69l1p4IA6G8nh0MhoC32HSV3JuabGDlq4EkoqkRRwMFiHJFRyu0635+ObEjcsdjxyZPbBNH0xuYhU5qS6AK8aJeqi8dnpeOsp8w== Received: from SN1NAM01FT045.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.64.57) by SN1NAM01HT191.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.64.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:30:40 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.64.55) by SN1NAM01FT045.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.65.226) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:30:40 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b067:154b:a27b:b91]) by MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b067:154b:a27b:b91%11]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:30:40 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Web Service Discovery host daemon Thread-Topic: Web Service Discovery host daemon Thread-Index: AQHVgsXceH/eEBWhzkKnJFCnfNUqqg== Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:30:40 +0000 Message-ID: Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BL0PR01CA0015.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:71::28) To MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:73::16) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:75B023632AC284590493C911A518C229EBAE58C2F79EAC11C21C1633EC82EF21; UpperCasedChecksum:8D6E66D9DC5FAD93636AB335D4A01EB7AD0FB14BF84163B2F4F2B564FA1DDCCF; SizeAsReceived:7442; Count:50 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [CCBVDcbYS2BfTDvad+iejuD/gPm7wol5] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20191014153035.0000375f@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 50 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1NAM01HT191: x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: kjrdxYgmb6ReCGiwNUUvQUHNWAjgO12dScWPx8eBEr/VFuIXJ0moGgJflOJBdz1p/m9UJclLzqlUZqFbi1YT55+793Syu19R/1LeIAovK1vaEDDgP/rYqIDdp4wpejAKr11hEG//vkVKig6UnREs2NFeZPWredu6XtD36fbGAWqcoz8bAfSmeT11kh5Wjc7I449p0IhhIFdYAisWR4HeC/rkZDD/qHJQjf4J2FUxiMA= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <4C1260A63E9B8345A26A28C01FCBEADC@namprd04.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: af818446-c268-4c7d-94df-08d750dcff1f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Oct 2019 19:30:40.3939 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM01HT191 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46sTDf0hkrz3Hxl X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=VxU9DmBH; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.0.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.10 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.91), asn: 8075(-2.65), country: US(-0.05)]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[11.0.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:30:43 -0000 SSBhbSBjb25zaWRlcmluZyBpbnN0YWxsaW5nICJ3c2RkIiA8aHR0cHM6Ly9naXRodWIuY29tL2No cmlzdGdhdS93c2RkPi4NCkkgaGF2ZSBub3QgYmVlbiBhYmxlIHRvIGZpbmQgYSBwb3J0IGZvciBp dC4gSSBqdXN0IHdhbnQgdG8gY29uZmlybSB0aGF0DQp0aGVyZSBpc24ndCBhIHBvcnQgYXZhaWxh YmxlIGZvciB0aGlzIHByb2dyYW0gYmVmb3JlIEkgZ28gYWJvdXQNCmluc3RhbGxpbmcgaXQgZnJv bSBzb3VyY2UuDQoNClRoYW5rcyENCg0KLS0gDQpDYXJtZWwNCg== From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 15 06:36:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C33154ED4 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46sm1R1tWdz3GlN for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3D2A3154ECE; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE72154ECD for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46sm1R0CQyz3Gl9 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD6DE1A9D6 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9F6aw28077563; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:58 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201910150636.x9F6aw28077563@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:58 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:36:59 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/mysql-connector-odbc | 5.3.13 | 8.0.18 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 15 07:24:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD31155E3E for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46sn3q1ZHkz3JlB for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from postfix.malikania.fr ([5.135.187.121]) by mwinf5d16 with ME id DjQ4210022dbEiD03jQ4iz; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:24:04 +0200 X-ME-Helo: postfix.malikania.fr X-ME-Auth: ZGVtZWxpZXIuZGF2aWRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:24:04 +0200 X-ME-IP: 5.135.187.121 Received: from [167.3.108.158] (unknown [77.159.242.250]) by postfix.malikania.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26466228B9 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:24:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20191014163725.ibff4boooir2xqi3@icepick.vmeta.jp> From: David Demelier Message-ID: <8b31b734-3886-eef1-b468-c86368606246@malikania.fr> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:24:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191014163725.ibff4boooir2xqi3@icepick.vmeta.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46sn3q1ZHkz3JlB X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markand@malikania.fr has no SPF policy when checking 80.12.242.130) smtp.mailfrom=markand@malikania.fr X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.907,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.85)[0.850,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[130.242.12.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[malikania.fr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3215, ipnet:80.12.240.0/20, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(1.10)[ip: (2.51), ipnet: 80.12.240.0/20(1.37), asn: 3215(1.64), country: FR(-0.00)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:24:08 -0000 Le 14/10/2019 à 18:37, Koichiro Iwao a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> >>> What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have >>> a big impact on build time and ressources required for building. >>> >>> If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am >>> glad to tell you that no, it will not be done. >>> >>> Now, the question is, why would someone need to have ruby flavors? >>> >>> The answer cannot be "because it should be fun" or "there is no reason >>> there should not be". >>> >>> Give us a real reason about why it would be required. >>> >> >> We have multiple versions of Ruby, we should provide the gems for each >> version. Right now, there is no way for users of Ruby 2.4 to install gem >> packages except to change the default ruby and then build their own >> packages. We want people to have fewer reasons to build their own packages, >> not more. >> >> We keep the latest Ruby as not default because it tends to have more bugs >> and gems lag, and the older version of Ruby is available because some gems >> tend to lag really badly. So, users do have legitimate reasons for using the >> non-default versions of Ruby. Also, upstream supports latest and two >> versions back. >> >> It wasn't until Ruby 2.6 was out that GitLab even supported 2.5, to give >> just one example. >> >> So, we have those versions of Ruby, and they should be usable, and that >> includes installing gems via pkg. >> >> There's the point that maybe we should only package gems that are needed by >> other things, which I can understand, but don't know if I necessarily agree >> with, because then you have users confused on what the "right" way to >> install a gem is. "Oh, this one is packaged because something else in ports >> needs it, so use the pkg, but this other one isn't packaged, so you have to >> use gem." >> >> And I'd think the same applies to python modules or perl modules, etc. One >> could ask, why not provide flavors for all versions of python, that is, 3.5, >> 3.6 and 3.7, along with the 2.7 ones as well, but to me that doesn't seem >> quite necessary because the compatibility is better there, as far as I can >> tell. But, I wouldn't be opposed to it personally, if someone did make the >> argument in favor of it. Same with Perl and especially things that depend on >> Java. >> >> But that's all beside the point, really. >> >> Steve > > Hello again everyone, > > I'm sorry I cannot express my thoughts correctly in English and I clould not > explain why flavors for Ruby required but swills explained far better than me. > > Based on his explanation, will it be a valid reason to introduce flavors > on Ruby ports? > Ruby use semantic versioning since version 2.1.0, unless there is Ruby 3 version release there is no reason to have flavors in FreeBSD for Ruby. Also, I don't even understand why there is several Ruby version in the ports tree since Ruby 2.6 is (as guaranteed by semantic versioning) retro compatible with 2.5, 2.4 and so on. Ports ruby24, ruby25 should be deleted. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 16 07:02:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DB915D44E for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp01.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46tNXV5vX7z4LQx for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from postfix.malikania.fr ([5.135.187.121]) by mwinf5d01 with ME id E72W2100i2dbEiD0372XTK; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:02:31 +0200 X-ME-Helo: postfix.malikania.fr X-ME-Auth: ZGVtZWxpZXIuZGF2aWRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:02:31 +0200 X-ME-IP: 5.135.187.121 Received: from [167.3.108.158] (unknown [77.159.242.250]) by postfix.malikania.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64A9328ECF for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:02:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20191014163725.ibff4boooir2xqi3@icepick.vmeta.jp> <8b31b734-3886-eef1-b468-c86368606246@malikania.fr> From: David Demelier Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:02:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46tNXV5vX7z4LQx X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markand@malikania.fr has no SPF policy when checking 80.12.242.123) smtp.mailfrom=markand@malikania.fr X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.84)[0.842,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.61)[0.608,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[123.242.12.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[malikania.fr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3215, ipnet:80.12.240.0/20, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.62)[ip: (0.10), ipnet: 80.12.240.0/20(1.38), asn: 3215(1.64), country: FR(-0.00)]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[123.242.12.80.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:02:37 -0000 Le 15/10/2019 à 18:41, Steve Wills a écrit : > I disagree with the idea that we can have simply one version of Ruby in > ports. Look at all the work it takes to move an app like GitLab to a new > version of Ruby: > > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/41825 > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/57323 > > I see no reason to think Ruby 2.7 will be any different. So Ruby team is lying with their versioning promise? -- David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 16 07:12:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83D715D8AE for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp01.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46tNmV5YS3z4MLr for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markand@malikania.fr) Received: from postfix.malikania.fr ([5.135.187.121]) by mwinf5d01 with ME id E7Cw2100j2dbEiD037Cx1B; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:12:57 +0200 X-ME-Helo: postfix.malikania.fr X-ME-Auth: ZGVtZWxpZXIuZGF2aWRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:12:57 +0200 X-ME-IP: 5.135.187.121 Received: from [167.3.108.158] (unknown [77.159.242.250]) by postfix.malikania.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9DF628FA2 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:12:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> <20190916143929.z6vnzoqjme6vw2ey@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190916161650.4ofb2o27tfxif57e@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190917064039.7qhnw3lds2zaxdl5@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20191014163725.ibff4boooir2xqi3@icepick.vmeta.jp> <8b31b734-3886-eef1-b468-c86368606246@malikania.fr> From: David Demelier Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:12:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46tNmV5YS3z4MLr X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markand@malikania.fr has no SPF policy when checking 80.12.242.123) smtp.mailfrom=markand@malikania.fr X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.59 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.80)[0.800,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.27)[0.268,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[123.242.12.80.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[malikania.fr]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3215, ipnet:80.12.240.0/20, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.62)[ip: (0.10), ipnet: 80.12.240.0/20(1.38), asn: 3215(1.64), country: FR(-0.00)]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[123.242.12.80.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:12:59 -0000 Le 16/10/2019 à 09:02, David Demelier a écrit : > Le 15/10/2019 à 18:41, Steve Wills a écrit : >> I disagree with the idea that we can have simply one version of Ruby >> in ports. Look at all the work it takes to move an app like GitLab to >> a new version of Ruby: >> >> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/41825 >> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/57323 >> >> I see no reason to think Ruby 2.7 will be any different. > > So Ruby team is lying with their versioning promise? > So they say to follow semantic versioning while it's not [0] MINOR: increased every christmas, may be API incompatible Definitely not what semantic versioning defines. I finally understand why other languages gained popularity over it ;) [0]: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/12/21/ruby-version-policy-changes-with-2-1-0/ -- Regards From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 16 07:49:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4669C15E358 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46tPZg1C9Zz4P89 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2578715E352; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253D615E351 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46tPZg0FG4z4P84 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A953CDA for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9G7nU8m007198; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:30 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201910160749.x9G7nU8m007198@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:30 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 07:49:31 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/keeperrl | 0.0.23 | alpha29 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 16 14:55:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8375166E29 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchman01@quicknet.nl) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46tb285z3Xz3M6p for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchman01@quicknet.nl) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CAFEB166E28; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB1A166E27 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchman01@quicknet.nl) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46tb276GyXz3M6m; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dutchman01@quicknet.nl) Received: from [212.54.42.136] (helo=smtp12.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKkhy-0007ov-G2; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:55:26 +0200 Received: from 94-211-246-78.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([94.211.246.78] helo=PC01) by smtp12.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKkhy-00066a-9c; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:55:26 +0200 From: "Dutchman01" To: Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Port: virtualbox-ose-5.2.32_1 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:55:24 +0200 Message-ID: <000501d58431$bd793980$386bac80$@quicknet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AdWEMWggxOLuQnTDRceMlTqZPM1xaw== Content-Language: nl X-SourceIP: 94.211.246.78 X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.3 cv=bpMy+3Si c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=BqQZNL78NY30Uq7df/RLnA==:17 a=XobE76Q3jBoA:10 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=p2QsaepqAAAA:8 a=puMOSPM2IpMjP0PLBegA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=h8SW4znuF2YAzIbKfioA:9 a=l0imVLzmmYzI3JNl:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=j9OoCblBdpqwJjV1eg_H:22 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46tb276GyXz3M6m X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[quicknet.nl:s=201809corplgsmtpnl]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.246.211.94.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.54.32.0/19:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[quicknet.nl]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[quicknet.nl:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[quicknet.nl,reject]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 212.54.32.0/20(-3.99), asn: 33915(-2.33), country: NL(0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[quicknet.nl]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33915, ipnet:212.54.32.0/20, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[164.42.54.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:55:29 -0000 New version of virtualbox is released, Please upgrade on ports please VirtualBox 5.2.34 (released October 15 2019) This is a maintenance release. The following items were fixed and/or added: * Virtualization core: some fixes for systems with lots of processors * Audio: relaxed VRM / VRA (variable rate audio) bit checks to provide more compatibility for guests running ALSA setups with the AC'97 emulation * Audio: Fixed "double buffering" size of a stream's internal ring buffer, adjusted logging). * USB: made device capturing for passthrough more accurate and reliable on Windows host * Network: fixed potential issue with interrupt signalling for network adapters in UEFI guests * 3D: fixed crash with some applications when using VBoxSVGA or VMSVGA graphics adapter (bug #18638) * 3D: fixed state saving and loading when the VBoxVGA graphics adapter is used with 3D enabled (bug #18802, 5.2.32 regression) * Multiple fixes in 3D/Graphics including Chromium * macOS host: fix crash of GUI VM process which showed up frequently with 10.15 Catalina (bug #18990) * Windows host: fixed crashes on startup with software trying to inject code into a VM process * Linux host: improve python version detection during rpm package creation, can change package dependencies and fix some installation problems * VBoxManage: copyto --target-directory now requires an ending slash for guests (bug #18724) * Windows host installer: Fixes for access permissions for installed files * Linux host and guest: fix kernel module build for SLES 12 SP4 kernel * Windows guests: fixed mouse cursor visibility updating * Linux guests: VBox Guest Additions fail to compile on Red Hat/CentOS/OL 7.7 and Red Hat 8.1 Beta (bug #18917) * Linux guests: improve compatibility of vboxvideo.ko kernel module build logic (bug #18869) Regards, Dutchman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 17 07:03:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63992148682 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46v0Vz239bz3P93 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4300514867F; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B9C14867C for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46v0Vz15Kcz3P8w for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02CCB1CE87 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9H73Mhw065240; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:22 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201910170703.x9H73Mhw065240@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:22 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:03:23 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/fb303 | 0.11.0 | 0.13.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 17 15:18:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DCC154B6C; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.xs4all.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46vCV754Q7z4Kdc; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from beastie.bionicmutton.org ([62.251.92.29]) by smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net with ESMTP id L7XhiN9wQbEWCL7XiibcIc; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:18:22 +0200 From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org, tingox@gmail.com Subject: Re:Falkon ( freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 855, Issue 2) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:18:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3485186.DPmmpGpFb9@beastie.bionicmutton.org> Organization: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3002093.fqq9MUTMxn"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCuccQ8XEFXEjQzW+xkM/IxLaiyXsNOXYS/egrmF1qke4hspSRCfBZ5VqfGrn8mlw7zPi2PMM4r+9Akbprzy2U0xD6BhlnkVFvJf1AviqKObxV0J5Y1b YuG35jjjd97xlyYz1SZ5smB7iaiB6JJgZC8p3NJIsewp/gAQwEjX6F9uxnVULzq24dYbyyyG01T4jZeaONdzbgPfNrOCoFSgxBplqE1kPrO4XjS52HOQpFeF +FXUchk8ql1D85dl/7YvmgFaFKEytmzPVOWWp08RnQg= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46vCV754Q7z4Kdc X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.72 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.72)[-0.719,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:18:24 -0000 --nextPart3002093.fqq9MUTMxn Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Responding specifically to falkon, not to pkg-meta-issue. On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 14:00:02 CEST freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org wrote: > Today I wanted to reinstall falkon (due to some library updates, > related to other packages on my system). > > root@kg-core2# pkg install -f falkon > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up to date. > All repositories are up to date. > pkg: No packages available to install matching 'falkon' have been > found in the repositories That looks like a hiccup (in the package-building, I guess), since it's there now root@beastie:~ # pkg search -f falkon falkon-3.1.0 Name : falkon Version : 3.1.0 Origin : www/falkon Architecture : FreeBSD:12:amd64 Prefix : /usr/local Repository : FreeBSD [pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:12:amd64/latest] (granted, you're on 11 and I'm on 12). We (kde@) didn't see any fallout about falkon, either. [ade] --nextPart3002093.fqq9MUTMxn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEUq+pvuD+N8/vVW++WoDe9T7W/7IFAl2ohjwACgkQWoDe9T7W /7Id0w/6A/2onGmUsjHg0ENs7b7XTvnSOtRFN4Ur4iQPQAK++RGqhSnAOpRWafMv gs6xIRsLd907xc0rF+XQ697T5iAeVn3+z/q1ghfxjca7k1ZTT1Q+rGe8ag1Ofdv5 UoCbp/YIG3WDfK7rF3Knv80nF0aziVsvHx8diiwkAyzwnewM7jJRycaxcALEgiA3 TJUZY8QNWeYPUuIN4hIWSzObMX1BvXwNn2xw/0yWuZG+iG2eD8SonaBtnwWf9eaw CsdSUX7dDlsbkMWcjd68gQXLPr1/RRNd2VXk3nv6COkaSN5kPhnRTRjSH5HM4Kxm 66GmrCdVAGsk0dWWBMnofqJghqZsXa+tsgA9AOpRu2ACotZdjjPW4/uzwEng4Lyt XtogCfse7olFQb2Dkdi0YPM4l1TT809Ys4JqK+sfzDCyvUgl6x91n8kmYQ0ofSzQ KXr3vrrV3fDYdFYGommOO+bcbPDF+xoG4BOTam8mXw+ri2FqXx0vHbTbvmhq/9ID cQP+BsHMx0ehmZTm+3muV1i2MDMLm9bGU7hJvJvT+oaavPW8DtTzkPP7zumfOJRv aNUB549q3HSiN0sHHc0hhRn3v7bvXYnMnh3Q8uL4T9bHtG4yS8uJctQGTqob1KuG FHHZH8oQg06wyRD+XjfWg+xsizUDM1eaTarLeRIn3hWX6Hy63NI= =4zvO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3002093.fqq9MUTMxn-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 18 06:56:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDA11481A2 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46vcJR04pxz4DVW for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 02ACF14819E; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013EB14819C for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46vcJQ6HBxz4DVK for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4F352D0 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9I6uMbw064506; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:22 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201910180656.x9I6uMbw064506@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:22 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:56:23 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ audio/qsampler | 0_5_0 | qsampler_0_6_0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout!