From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Nov 10 17:36:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BF01BA066; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B1Q05hzrz4CYH; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAAHa1EU058644 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Nov 2019 09:36:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xAAHa1J1058643; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 09:36:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 09:36:01 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Cc: bob prohaska Subject: www/chromium error: expected readable system register Message-ID: <20191110173601.GA58618@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47B1Q05hzrz4CYH X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.13 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.901,0]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.08)[ip: (0.32), ipnet: 50.1.16.0/20(0.16), asn: 7065(-0.04), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.943,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:36:10 -0000 An attempt to compile www/chromium on an RPI3 using 13.0-CURRENT #9 r354546 with ports at 517211 reported ../../third_party/boringssl/src/crypto/cpu-aarch64-linux.c:31:18: error: expected readable system register Is there a fix? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Nov 10 21:24:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8DA1A82EC for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B6Sz6Ttzz4Pgl for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: MariaDB 10.1.42? Message-Id: Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 14:24:01 -0700 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47B6Sz6Ttzz4Pgl X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.957,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.54)[0.538,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.19)[ip: (-0.70), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.19), asn: 209(-0.01), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 21:24:05 -0000 Any idea when we might see MariaDB 10.1.42 to counter = ? (It=E2=80=99s been a week). --=20 A man without religion is like a fish without a bicycle. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Nov 10 22:28:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D97A1AE7BE for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [IPv6:2606:c700:1:30::23:2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B7vQ1x8Jz4TBk for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@mailman-hosting.com) Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1466D24C035B for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:26:36 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= mailman-hosting.com; h=content-type:content-type:mime-version :subject:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:from :date:date; s=dkim; t=1573424782; x=1574288783; bh=bNXnxmhU8MFAN 1Lr5ZmLGGz60OtpwAmkhwybm4isbE0=; b=NCDHdMixAzFTB/+GOEtqtBZsbZgjN IxcoUgIhBOSgyGGtXNH3xDhROSVlbLGoZjxeOHmVvV9FuPeyiU1vQEM76MXxSB/l ci683hgBnuC3LItKnXiSOqUl96I9HgUxUVm+h4/R5aczkUrNU41/tQZazUNu786t S4qfBxWZfmSRzQ= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maurice.jlkmail.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from maurice.jlkmail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (maurice.jlkmail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id HK2HpTb5i6fO for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:26:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.198] (static-70-104-198-154.nrflva.fios.verizon.net [70.104.198.154]) by maurice.jlkmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97F9724C019C; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:26:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:26:17 -0500 From: jim@mailman-hosting.com To: FreeBSD , =?utf-8?Q?=40lbutlr?= Message-ID: <18ed651e-6b2c-4240-aff6-77319252c4a6@Spark> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: MariaDB 10.1.42? X-Readdle-Message-ID: 18ed651e-6b2c-4240-aff6-77319252c4a6@Spark MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47B7vQ1x8Jz4TBk X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=mailman-hosting.com header.s=dkim header.b=NCDHdMix; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=mailman-hosting.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jim@mailman-hosting.com designates 2606:c700:1:30::23:2a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jim@mailman-hosting.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[mailman-hosting.com:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_EXCESS_QP(1.20)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.995,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[mailman-hosting.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[mailman-hosting.com,none]; IP_SCORE(-0.08)[asn: 53850(-0.35), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:53850, ipnet:2606:c700::/32, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:28:38 -0000 According to=C2=A0https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/mariadb-10142-release= -notes/=C2=A010.1.42, which was released *five* days ago, has a serious b= ug. This is fixed in 10.1.43, which was released *two* days ago. See http= s://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/mariadb-10143-release-notes/ Perhaps you can provide a patch. Jim Ohlstein On Nov 10, 2019, 4:24 PM -0500, =40lbutlr , wrote: > Any idea when we might see MariaDB 10.1.42 to counter =3F > > (It=E2=80=99s been a week). > > > > -- > A man without religion is like a fish without a bicycle. > > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > freebsd-ports=40freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to =22freebsd-ports-unsubscribe=40freebsd= .org=22 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Nov 11 00:10:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0A51B75FA for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BB8X496Cz4XWy for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: MariaDB 10.1.42? Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:10:02 -0700 References: <18ed651e-6b2c-4240-aff6-77319252c4a6@Spark> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <18ed651e-6b2c-4240-aff6-77319252c4a6@Spark> Message-Id: <51954EFB-F305-47A9-B010-C72992D58E77@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47BB8X496Cz4XWy X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.65 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.22)[0.225,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.19)[ip: (-0.70), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.19), asn: 209(-0.01), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:10:05 -0000 On 10 Nov 2019, at 15:26, jim@mailman-hosting.com wrote: > On Nov 10, 2019, 4:24 PM -0500, @lbutlr , wrote: >> Any idea when we might see MariaDB 10.1.42 to counter = ? > According to = https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/mariadb-10142-release-notes/ 10.1.42, = which was released *five* days ago, has a serious bug. This is fixed in = 10.1.43, which was released *two* days ago. See = https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/mariadb-10143-release-notes/ I only checked the ports site, not knowing about maridb.com > Perhaps you can provide a patch. No, that=E2=80=99s not something I would be able to do. --=20 SOURCERERS MAKE THEIR OWN DESTINY. THEY TOUCH THE EARTH LIGHTLY. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Nov 11 06:52:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1142F1ACEDC for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BM5Q6rKZz3LYN for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E91261ACED7; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E351ACED6 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BM5Q5yt0z3LYJ for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E009B8C3 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xAB6qwa4059227; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:58 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201911110652.xAB6qwa4059227@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:58 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:52:59 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/fasm | 1.73.16 | 1.73.17 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/js_of_ocaml | 2.5 | 3.5.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Nov 12 16:55:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2BA1B29F5 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47CDQW1bdjz3Hrj for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xACGtZrh049026 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:55:36 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: kremels@kreme.com Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xACGta1v070014; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:55:36 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Omg upgrade wants to install MySQL To: "@lbutlr" , FreeBSD References: <4B1C9CF4-9ACF-429A-B060-A8A7DA41C5FF@kreme.com> <2f7865de-e8be-002e-b9a1-4a409e2e3da1@grosbein.net> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5DCAE408.2090507@grosbein.net> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:55:36 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after * Received: date * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47CDQW1bdjz3Hrj X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.69 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-1.59)[ip: (-4.01), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.27), asn: 24940(-1.65), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:55:48 -0000 On 03.11.2019 21:03, @lbutlr wrote: >>> On 02 Nov 2019, at 19:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>>> I prefer third option. Sometimes it is handy to "pkg lock" packages you installed from ports buiklt with non-default options, too. >>> >>> If I could tell which pkg install is going to install MySQL and libX stuff I would lock those, but I Dion’t see anyway to check that. >> >> You need to lock MariaDB. > > MariaDB *is* locked. Both client and server. Pkg update was still going to install MySQL. pkg has no choice, as official package repo contains packages built with MySQL dependency only. >>> And it does seem odd that pkg is still assuming MySQL and desktop FreeBSD. >>> I know of many 120 FreeBSD servers and not one has a GUI desktop. >>> I mean, I am sure they exist, but they must be a pretty tiny sliver. >> >> First, it is NOT pkg assuming anything. Package repository has packages built from ports with their *default* options >> and pkg merely uses them. > > Fine. Ports assuming MySQL. Yes. You still may change defaults and rebuild those ports yourself. Same with X11 support. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Nov 13 06:55:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F561A815E for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47Cb3b327bz4dKB for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 65DAA1A815B; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659CC1A815A for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47Cb3b27Vnz4dK5 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C37BC688 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xAD6tdkG029762; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201911130655.xAD6tdkG029762@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:55:39 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/github-backup-utils | 2.8.3 | v2.19.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Nov 14 07:15:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3641C77DF for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DCSJ661Lz40yF for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CE29E1C77DD; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC44C1C77DB for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47DCSJ4yHjz40xw for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69C2924C05 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xAE7FiIr029872; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201911140715.xAE7FiIr029872@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:15:45 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/mpich | 3.2.1 | 3.3.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/py-google-compute-engine | 2.8.16 | v20191113 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Nov 15 15:25:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1723F1A872F for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F2HG3g9Jz41LV for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id n9so6540323vsa.12 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:25:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pSpGCAW+gDAeFzL1YnwtXJEtsCCMtAIEKpz/4mZKDb0=; b=PGzsD+9flgadLUGWsre6dkdWPP/5JG1AEivLSyHPAUz6Z+rweL0m9kCQn4xz4IgIEY 7o//SWssozdzUE4h7pIHcGg1S5uCWJIVynionTLedE5lfnHMBEib8ainqdd400H3pKtR sVM0JOVyljlHwf46gWmnqUirQZt/nIhU/yHkqM4lyYi/Jxf0Rnh4bv9oBMmxDSXqu/Gf lFzNv8+ZwITTRXqj1nK2UbZGQBmXYDI34nn/YtivgYx/VxUp1HNxUFQtIvkS660lKIvh w4Udbw5SysJTxv0YFiu1Eef8m71QTuAokwf6CUc3XQugR9Idm22b4z1tQ2qSOb/WY0cl iWCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pSpGCAW+gDAeFzL1YnwtXJEtsCCMtAIEKpz/4mZKDb0=; b=h0q89uhn2mV3LhZBQ5CwHqB20Yc0lp5xsrXrIUBK0OxqYYZF1iTX7WX+PWihfiH8pp JxEW3UreZXWFn8dRI9mrpxtxlwML9oox6NNE+Xb0/gDnqjbpKVsgDDftR+/HxhkSUKXe WCgkvu5Gf9uY4QcvjN+tRQnH07K+ppQYTszHQiBeXOJQGaSfHKI3apLnqfZnXsglgRtt ROQ2Ip8hQ0cz71eSwwLHM1qhOZBrKatQo7/vu3UIJGIQK+3yTb5ZK93iMp10hmcQhtzv oQ1bztDu3JI2dV6oPge9d36zpBiXRMsPSq3betr5DdBqS1nu08hjHrG/sRs2k+OEABHO BQCw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXVKGZMqFme8XZs5U/lUcowL8XoelkMetsWnHUvq/V1PWNCdaCN z8+8F473Izik/7Pu8vCBAEJcn1KBnDiiG9QeIG7lsruXB2Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzjvPvFCzwUvrSRtRK77H+hngD95jRG3GFSk8p3JuArO8jYTGjkwpVgE5eZAGjK7GD8m8IvlQUptnmd7vBQ7lw= X-Received: by 2002:a67:6ac7:: with SMTP id f190mr9577521vsc.55.1573831544791; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:25:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Nick Rogers Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:25:33 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47F2HG3g9Jz41LV X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PGzsD+9f; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ncrogers@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ncrogers@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.66), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.32), asn: 15169(-1.98), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:25:48 -0000 Hello, I'm not sure if this belongs in a bug report or not, but it seems that a recent commit marked many ports BROKEN with reason "unfetchable". However, I don't seem to have a problem fetching and building them if I remove the BROKEN declaration. The commit was: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r516897 | antoine | 2019-11-06 08:26:34 -0800 (Wed, 06 Nov 2019) | 2 lines Mark a few ports BROKEN (unfetchable) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ But "a few" is actually closer to 300... For me the affected ports were sysutils/pftop, sysutils/zfs-stats, and sysutils/stress, which worked just fine before this commit. Apologies if I am missing something, but it seems like they are not actually broken? Thanks, -Nick From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Nov 15 15:44:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5219B1A8DFB for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F2j00Pt4z3GSG for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: matthew/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5B2F9AB9 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from leaf.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:54da:4bb1:f4d0:383d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE8CD6186 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/EE8CD6186; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:29 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:36 -0000 On 15/11/2019 15:25, Nick Rogers wrote: > For me the affected ports were sysutils/pftop, sysutils/zfs-stats, and > sysutils/stress, which worked just fine before this commit. Apologies if I > am missing something, but it seems like they are not actually broken? If you were building these ports previously, then you probably have the distfiles in your local distfiles cache already. That will give the impression that everything is fine if you just try and build the port. If you didn't have a cached copy of the distfiles, then you'ld probably have a rather different experience. Although if you can show that the distfiles are now fetchable, eg. by: make distclean make fetch then by all means please do report it. A PR with patches is preferred, but any reasonable mechanism for bringing it to the attention of developers is acceptable. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Nov 15 16:07:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D50F1A98D1 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F3CN4wgMz4F2Y for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVe84-0004Ik-0v for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:07:24 +0100 Received: from 194-96-182-144.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([194.96.182.144] helo=[10.0.0.36]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVe83-0005jI-U2 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:07:23 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? From: "w.schwarzenfeld" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:08:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47F3CN4wgMz4F2Y X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[144.182.96.194.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.46), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.72), asn: 8437(-3.68), country: AT(-0.10)]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:07:30 -0000 For stress https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241986 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Nov 15 16:09:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629121A99AD for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F3GB1rTPz4Gtd for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeAR-0008Pz-Ii for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:09:51 +0100 Received: from 194-96-182-144.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([194.96.182.144] helo=[10.0.0.36]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeAR-0006E5-Fh for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:09:51 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? From: "w.schwarzenfeld" Message-ID: <73d77bc0-2846-2d5f-89fd-2e1aca5df080@utanet.at> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:11:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47F3GB1rTPz4Gtd X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[144.182.96.194.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.37), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.72), asn: 8437(-3.68), country: AT(-0.10)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[5.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:09:56 -0000 For pftop https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/tree/master/sysutils/pftop and zfs-stats https://github.com/mmatuska/zfs-stats From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Nov 15 16:27:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C521A9FEF for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F3fk5qMLz3DZS; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 90818C25A; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:27:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? References: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:27:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Matthew Seaman's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:44:29 +0000") Message-ID: <36ep-w1dv-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:27:43 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: > On 15/11/2019 15:25, Nick Rogers wrote: > >> For me the affected ports were sysutils/pftop, sysutils/zfs-stats, and >> sysutils/stress, which worked just fine before this commit. Apologies if I >> am missing something, but it seems like they are not actually broken? > > If you were building these ports previously, then you probably have > the distfiles in your local distfiles cache already. That will give > the impression that everything is fine if you just try and build the > port. If you didn't have a cached copy of the distfiles, then you'ld > probably have a rather different experience. Another copy maybe cached on FreeBSD mirrors. Here's how to check: $ make checksum TRYBROKEN= MASTER_SITE_BACKUP= DISTDIR=$(mktemp -dt distfiles) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Nov 15 16:30:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821581AA2AB for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F3kM6sl1z3LFQ for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeUj-00063C-Sx for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:30:49 +0100 Received: from 194-96-182-144.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([194.96.182.144] helo=[10.0.0.36]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeUj-0002Wr-Pp for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:30:49 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? From: "w.schwarzenfeld" Message-ID: <6efe84e0-6697-8bcb-582c-4857a92d406c@utanet.at> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:32:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47F3kM6sl1z3LFQ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[144.182.96.194.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.46), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.72), asn: 8437(-3.68), country: AT(-0.10)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:30:53 -0000 Sorry, was too fast. pftop is wrong. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Nov 16 01:04:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CD31B578C for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:04:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092255066.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.255.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FH760gBYz4Djg; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Y/VKY/nyYYgoHS8ikM7Os++xnVEKrqG99RtGmoHf20SK428bsGhqEDFlGmEKa+XgTwMSHi0YtDTqdLrps2nu1u/OY5LCHf4iu/Xy8K94nZYy6Y5YLVXmHSnPTvJ0KWaMRtzAjLWX5rdL826RFsBSNoN90e7mSICUu9fG/ZIO6PSi4gVHDEdqwv7Zz9VN4Denh7l8IlFB8delKKNLmi0Lk5zHaHeYjTKTuwzMwRSjeMLcDUOtlf5K+sRWl9gvHwdHFW4H1GMZBH/cMsEq/v0df+qI4iQi1J/iBo9oBaejqa1oC3fJzBG/TOSesKIUEBB98UnBpBz3cFrUaKv/N6JfRg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1LJLCy+YZ0fsblocjC9CX0mZGVbo7rgE3tlJRYu6jSg=; b=WtsWhhlbZ7GWAesQLCa8UxKIN7LxVn6EMIZXRTtxpBf5L9zfF1uXgu8srVcU04jfTooF2iQTIxvvmncmnhXVkjGex5f8JvN3Exl7GQ06JPSDbGB7P5vt0C4oRVOgrbVqJQ4hFG0yj1d5xpaedwycUgFaF6lGKPUwvsNdlYmqEiRvMvCOxViO4ONDDXSPJE5qAU6hjTjbTZtbCJBVn3+4w4J6AWnlbGYOJIvwD0/ekxXF9xT6PezxhkyC1o1FEB3OE0/x9eEBRyO1sj5AtMxuqp1546U+K4r8RMDNLHCVAx7vu5rVshCr5UpP+VbpEBcguq/1ZicLxMw2h0icmbt/2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1LJLCy+YZ0fsblocjC9CX0mZGVbo7rgE3tlJRYu6jSg=; b=s00OBwjBwxMzTBkX0YvtXEDMeVtq7GnN4QKGWyRneLpQk86Ex+X6UiaxYZCRsPJMPoqCyXoTjW8xl455UdIwz09tINoMjw9jRmbjvowAtA9C70CfSFk3nPGYx5ZB2O1XsMvOflVD7XytX5OYkXs1SJf3bWllmRtI1enbxl2gtAFaGfCx144BiFfJM6v0izAkJxuJIB2proxL0viJBgO+8Vxe289yRQG9wBoZx0is/CDicMUls2+7F/UoYhrJ2XPjJ9S85MrjCjrYtShu6ksPXglyV/TM2HQmRCZ45JXoWLqfiGrGpZOPgsIG3GSInhRqImU8NEmwq/ACfn5uB864Fw== Received: from SG2APC01FT017.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.54) by SG2APC01HT243.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.251.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2451.23; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:04:28 +0000 Received: from SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.152.250.60) by SG2APC01FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2451.23 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:04:28 +0000 Received: from SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c921:b0d7:34cd:40a6]) by SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c921:b0d7:34cd:40a6%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2430.029; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:04:27 +0000 From: Tatsuki Makino To: Jan Beich , Matthew Seaman CC: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? Thread-Topic: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? Thread-Index: AQHVm8j7p8sLDJjj+EGhTNsy2HcBtaeMX4+AgAAMKBKAAJBKgA== Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:04:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <36ep-w1dv-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <36ep-w1dv-wny@FreeBSD.org> Accept-Language: en-US, ja-JP Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: TYAPR01CA0106.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:2a::22) To SL2PR06MB3225.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:100:3b::19) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:5F6A54DCAA850373FC6A640844280003F156E450B124C4E2E63A797D33F55861; UpperCasedChecksum:E37AC9C6DBB763444932910767282651F9079A31E1E923F03C49A9F136D530CC; SizeAsReceived:7504; Count:49 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [6Sn2Rryo//p5v2I28W9qY0wUZuOvU4TV] x-microsoft-original-message-id: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 49 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4f17bcf1-4758-41bd-94b6-08d76a30edab x-ms-exchange-slblob-mailprops: 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 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SG2APC01HT243: x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HQgVvqgK/DwVzFKHf7b6KovwZGtcK0/B0GZQWi8MVUKpJZP4h+dv4wr3BxfyQWYENpBEwvh2SVNCklMUDJ24EEvHRVzcwIWVkGBUaUMuCE9bUwocn9CNcP26Ot0tbCnxYxU9qyGxa7im04qqBZ/DU3MwlRPQctH0k+Y1XOZ6PW1UFfyHsyh9x4+nma40VPr7 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <383188FE9F1CB6428C09FD8C91881A74@apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4f17bcf1-4758-41bd-94b6-08d76a30edab X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Nov 2019 01:04:27.9331 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT243 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47FH760gBYz4Djg X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.com header.s=selector1 header.b=s00OBwjB; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=hotmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com designates 40.92.255.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.90 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/15]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[hotmail.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[hotmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[hotmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[hotmail.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.85), asn: 8075(-2.79), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[66.255.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:04:36 -0000 SGVsbG8uDQoNCkNvdWxkIHlvdSBpbmNsdWRlIHRoaXMgYXMgd2VsbD8NCg0KcGtnIGRlbGV0ZSAt ZiBjYV9yb290X25zcw0KDQpEbyBzb21lIHJlbHkgb24gTUFTVEVSX1NJVEVfQkFDS1VQPw0KDQpS ZWdhcmRzLg0KDQo= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Nov 16 01:26:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91111B6073 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:26:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FHcp5rTsz3Lf2 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVmrO-0001rF-3n for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 02:26:46 +0100 Received: from 194-96-182-144.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([194.96.182.144] helo=[10.0.0.36]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iVmrO-0005QI-0V for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 02:26:46 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <73d77bc0-2846-2d5f-89fd-2e1aca5df080@utanet.at> Subject: Re: Many ports recently marked BROKEN/unfetchable that aren't broken? From: "w.schwarzenfeld" Message-ID: <455af24d-6727-5f5c-69bc-f64412d2f67e@utanet.at> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 02:27:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <73d77bc0-2846-2d5f-89fd-2e1aca5df080@utanet.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47FHcp5rTsz3Lf2 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[144.182.96.194.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.43), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.71), asn: 8437(-3.68), country: AT(-0.10)]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:26:52 -0000 A PR for zfs-stats already exists: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241963 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Nov 16 07:06:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B1B1BD009 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FR8J3xw6z4WrP for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 878761BD006; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8747A1BD005 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FR8J37dpz4WrK for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C61525B7C for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xAG768A7094776 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xAG768r8094775; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201911160706.xAG768r8094775@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:06:08 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/py-google-compute-engine | 2.8.16 | v20191115 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout!