From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 00:37:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689CC15BEC1B for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 00:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (static-71-163-255-121.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.163.255.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail", Issuer "mail" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9474C6CB67 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 00:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel.monochrome.org (tripel.monochrome.org [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5N09Kop083762; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:09:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:09:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Polytropon cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem burning DVD In-Reply-To: <20190622090010.65724d79.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20190622090010.65724d79.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9474C6CB67 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.34 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.33)[0.334,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[monochrome.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.92)[0.922,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.monochrome.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.98)[0.978,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:71.163.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.22)[asn: 701(1.14), country: US(-0.06)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 00:37:27 -0000 On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Polytropon wrote: [ big snip ] > Is there some description of what error codes like "Error 22", "0x16" > or "SK=4h/ASC=03h/ACQ=00h" mean? ^^^^^^^ The first thing that popped into my head was that 03h (alias 0x03) is the ASCii character ETX, meaning of course 'end of text.' Could there be some issue with the file you're writing from? Just grasping at straws... -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 03:45:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1389B15C43D5 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 03:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D45718DE for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 03:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.12.231]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1N1Oo7-1ibmbE2aIF-012rTM; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 05:45:27 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 05:45:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Chris Hill Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem burning DVD Message-Id: <20190623054527.da1435d0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20190622090010.65724d79.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Fhl9CJqlCMOrO+hUyUKcfsRsMibrVy1+/of8XTcE0tG7jNnXs0M w/nyII3YGpigRtVS7jRUkuBK1gmlafPZeYcJJz4nUBUQswCAwhm8C8bgX8CubQlkAUKKWki pxKmMLGZrYlKDZIWd/3TvnVdqSUdTdChKZxIz1a8DTDGthJyHSQHUf8Bx86my9XgdE1x3n+ HE6Hrcn4ZUB1qcMcnJFFw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:nGbBe47R/bk=:HwaA7C3qq4JyM3ejnBoiIZ GpUaAp/xdj4RxJTB1JaRHPwULtcQ5Mmw8brabwGoDj1J5nXjSQU2T4LUTG1NdvhOhPMFkanPe 89sIfp1TTj3UVx1Zetc24IPldqVVuQnSbDMJBYoLhL2aTwMiSS5eS/U8Q/Gy9vRiFxfUUb/Hc LW7bVFH3Ax2pxy2m7pgVSoDUkk3e1Id9EeG+KyO4vet6p2DVz/JakSlZ8LiCZPAtlQwIDonHm 2KDwIGPHbG0LsidDxhkky9EgWNjVulUopMikHma7BjQHnPp8blcQF7N7wISyZgpVOi01InYcW XtYJdYqUNMkrOMbMo7zNf5KoY43NIg5UBXBlXppWYSdBDdPTavvsrhqfNbj4Es/5CWFeKh/J1 iGxqbqco7kFyNxatgfbO06QT1LruEM8aSGTivNSosreqtv1biRcucpup9ctDhtsMFivhky8wt sODLKPgty5qwaddI+3ZXK6WCMgHl5M+m844kl1LVbKs9C2M4SGpufw2i6m7eJTHby8QpN6vWl atP72kaOleNvhQhRYkGnfqKUH7Ps2SVmxzdURpsyX3/jGO2ZvBZ3MISl7mIMIXMgrl9fgYpI/ E4M4AV692dZ+NxEhUv6LpsvdVvlwEoFrdpqyNgU46GMve6dq2sWCnZd3KY+Q0d2UyUsRlgBZq eUkXGHhf4acixc5QUSnzZPLz1J+qw9QyrmiPmZGVJPFECVSsO2H6O+bESrYKGlbAw/kDko9VL Wq2lklm+JEAvTnLnxWDAXtcofV+jGh1mxbDY4CzZS46sQajPEdPQfAticGk= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D5D45718DE X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.54 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx00.schlund.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.22)[-0.223,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[231.12.222.94.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.985,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[135.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[135.126.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.39)[ip: (0.87), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.41), asn: 8560(2.49), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 03:45:35 -0000 On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:09:20 -0400 (EDT), Chris Hill wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Polytropon wrote: > > [ big snip ] > > > Is there some description of what error codes like "Error 22", "0x16" > > or "SK=4h/ASC=03h/ACQ=00h" mean? > ^^^^^^^ > The first thing that popped into my head was that 03h (alias 0x03) is > the ASCii character ETX, meaning of course 'end of text.' Could there be > some issue with the file you're writing from? Interesting find! Yes, I remember the ASCII table's control codes, and "ASC" could mean exactly that, "ASCII Code"; maybe ACQ is "ASCII Queue"? And SK? No idea. I'd be interested if there is a reference list somewhere that would explain the codes and the values. The "file" is a subdirectory containing the files for a DVD (created with a script I wrote, which runs mencoder for file conversion, creates the XML description for the DVD, then runs dvdauthor, and finally growisofs), stored on a SSD, with no further system activity. Here is a "session hardcopy" of the last step I executed manually (as this can easily be repeated): $ growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -dvd-video -r -J -udf dvd/ WARNING: /dev/dvd already carries isofs! About to execute 'mkisofs -dvd-video -r -J -udf dvd/ | builtin_dd of=/dev/pass0 obs=32k seek=0' Warning: Disabling Joliet support for DVD-Video. Setting input-charset to 'ISO8859-1' from locale. The pad was 26 for file VIDEO_TS.IFO 1.15% done, estimate finish Sat Jun 22 09:02:30 2019 2.30% done, estimate finish Sat Jun 22 09:02:30 2019 3.45% done, estimate finish Sat Jun 22 09:02:30 2019 /dev/pass0: "Current Write Speed" is 16.4x1352KBps. :-[ WRITE@LBA=0h failed with SK=5h/CANNOT WRITE MEDIUM - INCOMPATIBLE FORMAT]: Invalid argument :-( media is not formatted or unsupported. :-( write failed: Invalid argument $ _ Of course the medium is not formatted (it's an unused, therefore completely empty DVD+R). But "unsupported"? Maybe this particular drive doesn't like the brand? But I also tried a different one, and in the past, I _did_ once successfully burn a DVD (of the same brand!) with that particular drive, sonething not totally uncommon: My father's Dell laptop doesn't like one specific brand of DVDs to record, but works fully as expected with a different brand. Other drives seem to be picky about DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW, DVD+RW which is also confusing for people. :-) My "solution" was to scp dvd/ over to my home PC and use _that_ to burn the files - same kind of medium, worked without problems. Sadly, I don't have a spare "slot-in" optical unit for the R61i, so it would be interesting to see if a different drive would lead to a change of results... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 07:31:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559F015C7E4D for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@cretaforce.gr) Received: from smtp2.cretaforce.gr (smtp2.cretaforce.gr [159.69.244.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.cretaforce.gr", Issuer "RapidSSL RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0421776ACC for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@cretaforce.gr) Received: from server1.cretaforce.gr (server1.cretaforce.gr [138.201.248.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.cretaforce.gr", Issuer "RapidSSL RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by smtp2.cretaforce.gr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C2891F4D7 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:31:48 +0300 (EEST) Received: from christoss-air.zte.com.cn (194.219.54.122.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [194.219.54.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: chris@cretaforce.gr) by server1.cretaforce.gr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C6A927363 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:31:48 +0300 (EEST) From: Christos Chatzaras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: jail issue on vps, daemons dying Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:31:46 +0300 References: To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <1B8F00EB-7782-4731-958F-335166D636B9@cretaforce.gr> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0421776ACC X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of chris@cretaforce.gr designates 159.69.244.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=chris@cretaforce.gr X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.59 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.244.42]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cretaforce.gr]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.19)[0.192,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.926,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.cretaforce.gr]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.21)[-0.206,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.26)[ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(3.12), asn: 24940(-1.80), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.244.69.159.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[122.54.219.194.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:31:58 -0000 > On 23 Jun 2019, at 02:27, David Mehler wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm running FreeBSD on a vps. I've got it as a host system and am > running three FreeBSD jails. I'm noticing and I've not been able to > pin down times that sometimes functionality won't be working, i'll > check the appropriate jail and find that a server is not running. No > configuration changes have been made, i'll restart it, then a while > later, same thing. I'm thinking either CPU or resource utilization ram > wise, can I limit each jail's individual resource usage on the host? > > Thanks. > Dave. Maybe free RAM is not enough and processes are killed? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 08:58:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9841415CA547 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD938173B for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8BF9115CA546; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6957415CA544 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C38C78173A for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id t28so9705800lje.9 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 01:58:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hABE80Ayr/zUTbDW7DZ/7bfwIek8XTrXXoRqcINoyqA=; b=ZfkKBcTlBmpj1G8qJ9FxvGQ7QQZmiBhimtfSfGpycnOp6B2YBc4e1B/HVqSWtUhxHG FLvKh9Kpvfe7hm2YKGgmFNHrZGCkIgiccqz3t2mJC2iiTXL/ynPD8VEzDgWa+WvP/JQw FHTJ4bcS4EgH4WbvdtCAvwTKVKj8H77vZy+AQEuJCU1xsC0H0k8A5NRHkstkgm7hZRk5 5G7ilPSOPdb25GJSmUk4gVYQxXzWiDWuc/qdv7B0M0jrYVW1sHQ/7SfNHpSYqEsQuwiB Vf34tM++/0F8ToVTGq/tGn9MHIJUIry1i3ibyzEg3VXW74jbi4VfqTMFrkbSKIgpKWHW +qVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hABE80Ayr/zUTbDW7DZ/7bfwIek8XTrXXoRqcINoyqA=; b=R+PvF6TME2SQg7wuEjW5Fbli9B1dez3T/ohQJhd3qbRMPbA83umU/urWwqrlWb0/47 vd9ZOAwA7W2FxurWi+hbV16LN+MrmTe8hfMcRqIrPh5+60IC0kIgqHzR3FgHoz/VY61w d6yS7RT1Q33/uiruGJJM6bKsDQPUzT5nDfSwohKFGMXdFVqzx94E72t/H0JtMiIUQZ37 7rHl41ubjlmKhQZEA5eJoLDlSAQHTgbDoIfrtuHsbHId12H7ObvmOWBvZya1sonFH/NM 6yb2fC2qOfLp4qX/vfRg8svPoDj9PV2kV8vpyHetkqQs3ZaVS9Fr4CDWyMA7XC6Ntd4i Uycw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLJHSUcMYCSWqzOwtNbGmhMzPPI4xX90kvaaT2Sa5iwq5bt4/o 8qjUe1wbqOFsR34VwxaP4ewYzplR5NtLp8ZxnUjYyJmB/o4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwDi64WrK4YDkab78/0PWvJRioMqvF9nAUjoGN/ZV1RR0Kw6FsIPjv0IuwFkTaMJFNV3gm9wDe4WjgQwpVUP7o= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:894a:: with SMTP id b10mr42379495ljk.99.1561280293706; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 01:58:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:57:33 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: local_unbound not working To: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= Cc: questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C38C78173A X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:58:18 -0000 On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 at 18:56, Trond Endrest=C3=B8l wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 18:03+0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > I have a system which is an exact replica of the other except for the D= NS > > names and IP addresses. > > The system is FreeBSD-12. > > Now, on the original system, local_unbound is working perfectly for nam= e > > resolutions. > > On the replica, name resolution is not working. > > I have edited the IPs correctly in unbound.conf, resolv.conf, rc.conf - > > every other place I can think of. > > What would cause this failure?? > > Wildly speculating here of course, does the replica live in the same > subnet as the original, and is the replica allowed to speak to the > external DNS service? > The replica lives in a different subnet. It's actually being used as a gateway server elsewhere. > > Any typos in the IP address, netmask, gateway, or name of the > interface(s)? > The configs are identical except for interface: 192.168.xx.254 Are the MAC addresses unique in either case? > Yes. They are two different servers living in two physical locations, in two different ISPs. > > Is the switchport placed in shutdown, assuming a manageable/programmable > switch? > The LAN/WAN interfaces are both functional. The PF configuration differs only in the WAN IP and LAN subnet. If I put the same DNS servers that I have in /var/unbound/forward.conf in m= y /et/resolv.conf, DNS resolution works. --=20 Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 09:47:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9068215CB2EA for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84E3382D57 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1561283248; x=1563875248; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:message-id:subject:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=C1l5yeukOhJaOk3ZhPbJuaopxt/cTipeldMeHMDumEs=; b=YzsIVWO/NPMedRZw+kqX2Cm3IWHpCBNIhc59Nwoq0IVzf8IvFVcFf51hrPfbu0nqjb0xN9LAJh7sxn0z8TfQ0kA8EF33DN5ZxwzQLN91uWIspfm8xb5eDZTxRALzeOGFuy5C8XJQjf6dUOZhjwDF32R2kx/ibC7ZF/ITZY45PWg= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xYjUwMDAwMDA2NGYzNGEuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r2.us-west-2a.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r2.us-west-2a.aws.in.socketlabs.com [54.186.58.227]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 05:47:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r2.us-west-2a.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 05:47:13 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1hez5b-000OdT-DD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:47:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:47:11 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: mpd5 pppoe losing configuration Message-Id: <20190623104711.a8bb5931fbbeb68c5b7762e2@sohara.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 84E3382D57 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=YzsIVWO/; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.95 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mxbh.socketlabs.com,mxbsg.socketlabs.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.76)[-0.757,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com]; IP_SCORE(-0.22)[ip: (-0.57), ipnet: 142.0.176.0/22(-0.26), asn: 7381(-0.19), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.964,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; FORGED_SENDER_VERP_SRS(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[198.176.0.142.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.15.0]; ENVFROM_VERP(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:47:28 -0000 Hi, My FTTH connection presents as PPPOE on a VLAN for which I have mpd5 configured and working fine most of the time. Sometimes the ng0 interface it creates loses its IP configuration without logging anything obvious by way of cause, when this happens restarting mpd5 always restores the connection. I get the impression that this sort of thing is not unusual with PPPOE connections. I'm hoping I'm missing something obvious and there's some way of configuring mpd5 to notice this and renegotiate the connection automatically, does anyone know of a way or have another nice simple idea before I resort to writing a script. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 11:49:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4D415CE52C for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [198.71.6.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E058769F for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [198.71.6.79]) by mail2.nber.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5NBjsAU034741 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:45:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:45:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Feenberg To: Polytropon cc: Chris Hill , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem burning DVD In-Reply-To: <20190623054527.da1435d0.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20190622090010.65724d79.freebsd@edvax.de> <20190623054527.da1435d0.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, 2019/06/21 11:15:13 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.721, bases: 2019/06/23 04:22:00 #9855574 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E0E058769F X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=nber.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of feenberg@nber.org designates 198.71.6.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=feenberg@nber.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.929,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-0.01)[country: US(-0.06)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[79.6.71.198.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.4.2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[smtp.nber.org]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nber.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.826,0]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26287, ipnet:198.71.6.0/23, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:49:00 -0000 On Sun, 23 Jun 2019, Polytropon wrote: > > Sadly, I don't have a spare "slot-in" optical unit for the R61i, > so it would be interesting to see if a different drive would lead > to a change of results... > My long (but older) experience with advising people who have trouble burning DVDs is to burn at half the rate (supposedly) supported by the burner and DVD. That almost always cures the problem. Vendors are just a tad optimistic. Daniel Feenberg From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 12:57:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8C215D0316 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emu@emuadmin.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAD2898AD for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emu@emuadmin.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CD26415D0315; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB70115D0314 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emu@emuadmin.com) Received: from mail.emuadmin.com (mail.emuadmin.com [108.61.189.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD70898AC for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emu@emuadmin.com) Received: from mail.emuadmin.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: emu@emuadmin.com) by mail.emuadmin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 361B31F9F0 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:28 +0000 From: Emilian Ursu To: questions Subject: Re: local_unbound not working Message-ID: <20190623125728.sdrgitlmb53ktuk4@mail.emuadmin.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5FD70898AC X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.995,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:57:39 -0000 Hi, by default local_unbound requires DNSSEC and will fail if upstream doesn't support it. You can check by commenting out auto-trust-anchor-file in /var/unbound/unbound.conf On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have a system which is an exact replica of the other except for the DNS > names and IP addresses. > The system is FreeBSD-12. > Now, on the original system, local_unbound is working perfectly for name > resolutions. > On the replica, name resolution is not working. > I have edited the IPs correctly in unbound.conf, resolv.conf, rc.conf - > every other place I can think of. > What would cause this failure?? > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 > "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 14:45:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A974A15D2B3D for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91328DF05 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id u8so10836813wmm.1 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:45:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8gUmNJM2jCn49wSZUQe585H8zEk0gBIGr9dE3xcerVs=; b=PAon78pJ9eEHlJsSaagCON4nOLYysZ4Gg6fYqx6u0O5vUeORjw+ASvjVqpVTTN9nuN 7Mw44vF+RsmwS6uSQFkEhr+Lwuc9LYIL6S0AHggARGqSG5kbJx/v61CyF9ypXYTtny3/ l7lKeQGEuvUTQ0jpuwh8+CeLS/i6KNFbRuzwmD5pDYBwNF5WlnUmQCVVCidC3mVaNm2S Qo6cnTvylkextyc7SJgp8SWVO1Ahzswsb9y/CtLDaL3UJOsVlr1DRoNQvPoOzK6BXVMO NMnm0DLGS8yEv41xtpIRbuB+AIAnCh4E2g/P2eMgctIb98ny0LuzKtBj7f5LVxHE+AbZ F5vA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8gUmNJM2jCn49wSZUQe585H8zEk0gBIGr9dE3xcerVs=; b=eONcWz2qcXLdi7+JuQkcn1uPg1aBZNP8i8xhn2fDI60r5LkOIid/D26xJEUmhTZOh3 Tu1YbqEuZbPmH8d+bNW1GrWKwOj+L9IiVgi8E9oxy+NW+V6Y5cHf0PzjbtSJ/j37459D agpLimsLt0TB9lTE/9pto9asAZVO0Oi+cg+byGHaL4IyHgypu0VquyOS2SoGVkkiLC2I I7P3OJR6iD1N01thP52/fv2xyM8uQUm/IfpmrSRSFTzVOAFzt7BpmwNUkaqfVXkoY3zU 2upDjWVOqjmioN+UyEjAYVFYBLzqKMEG8O7P6Qqb7AYOaPMkPgdGPW+/3Un2XSgA7n4c WDOg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYtKpyKhiIiIv5jloWwexARR5VLhsKBqOKLkSobi/RFYzfYKxh I7JJKRmCKzmn+tVqA2vwEoXsXO+9CySi3FqtQeM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwh9JSQTAdu1IyccVhTlx5jktmna15bSr3cVKeu1+9W3+gCcVdyxaFOjxbJXf9M2dAmYdzwnkWsPTWPUx8vqEU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:23d2:: with SMTP id p18mr11636233wmb.108.1561301135455; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:45:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:adf:a314:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1B8F00EB-7782-4731-958F-335166D636B9@cretaforce.gr> References: <1B8F00EB-7782-4731-958F-335166D636B9@cretaforce.gr> From: David Mehler Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:45:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: jail issue on vps, daemons dying To: Christos Chatzaras Cc: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A91328DF05 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PAon78pJ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of davemehler@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=davemehler@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.73 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.74)[ip: (-8.77), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.54), asn: 15169(-2.32), country: US(-0.06)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:45:38 -0000 Hi, The vps has 4GB of ram, but it's running the host system, which only runs the jails, and it runs three jails. If it's killing processes how do I correct this issue? Thanks. Dave. On 6/23/19, Christos Chatzaras wrote: > >> On 23 Jun 2019, at 02:27, David Mehler wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm running FreeBSD on a vps. I've got it as a host system and am >> running three FreeBSD jails. I'm noticing and I've not been able to >> pin down times that sometimes functionality won't be working, i'll >> check the appropriate jail and find that a server is not running. No >> configuration changes have been made, i'll restart it, then a while >> later, same thing. I'm thinking either CPU or resource utilization ram >> wise, can I limit each jail's individual resource usage on the host? >> >> Thanks. >> Dave. > > Maybe free RAM is not enough and processes are killed? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 17:53:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F33D15D634E for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 17:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9D295DA5 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 17:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.12.231]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MQdpG-1hzVXP0UWU-00NkLj; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:48:29 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:48:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Daniel Feenberg Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem burning DVD Message-Id: <20190623194827.e425b150.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20190622090010.65724d79.freebsd@edvax.de> <20190623054527.da1435d0.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UVGJrXM2ZvRZBda3jtZPvAoBGtNp8ie5v6AL4fGzl0AO6T1Mzid jdG3j2rPMLFd9aoTAlE+837GSDlAXP39ylDGcAsEXL+8nFYWAIwHh/zjvVPn40ihj5VC7No 0YoFP7f37cSLo5zLDvqihWdBG39pMcIVioAH92Wm41J0o+NUZG3L4hftHEcuwDiZhQr+1Rh Fzx1Pp50DYKIWNe1mUsHA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:C9NrphsOojM=:DeQOo/bnvLboZ+iz9cfy6X 2yYSpIvAXZO7PZ0pQvebp/KJeqV0CT5gW8W99BP3CHWOf7yu9rpDiAojWWhDezbXYp/JcjYid ICC41rl4RuMRu6ewqPE3WTg10CmeQd0EzQAnHztJvtU/zp/kYwXHLKVd4bx/Ck8tlomnW35w+ ftJZuQoKtLzOS2Qf+l+lwxpm1vA2zZug5mC5zxmT4kPkZ8ltg2WYUp0rdi0ZCcaaH+06HoWp8 Q/SB0HqlZqVpYI/fWD+HmpcJr+EndLWxWppqkIV4L/6Nxhzbiazq41vBYSBknanwU/MKEIsZA Z4BOFRRkuj6Aoli8BDEWcNUU1eiITBzVoB4XgNeob+W5mG7J4FLY4FCzDZnMC7kbWEFbNn+gb P5WFhcjjSYQZJi9rl1IvvEqK7ItVkhXrLBq5FDa73y0PjdG8lJmh+52662po82I3v3GRqOwN1 HIzutsjgIRQ/yAG3H2wSYJaFv4BrJDkIC3iDyoQbTiaaRAsNl/OtVHyZCB/ZKNgvMldu9LGje 57KyCYWH4H3IuY6V11GcYCmhIubvXiFzFKqPMOnCrx1co7AutxqYjKabgt4BZrzXHaeKKNBve BtfeCmr+RBiLX2vluvAmqF/C/JYWIluNuJKL3U9iSGbujySSdSwiaLXp/JoLeIhhkmeeXVt7F Fl36i+iKSYnoRF7/vOTaX4pGQCdBJxyG6XGhFQBaCDXfWPAQrOdyzLVuZzCMCcNQ4QoL8dp5R nzhcB+v04uuNKf6wObb5Gj7E4qHL4KH57PNJVbYNNnMzQtHyi6VudMEy1WY= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BB9D295DA5 X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.89 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx01.schlund.de,mx00.schlund.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[231.12.222.94.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.95)[0.953,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.994,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[131.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.55)[ip: (1.66), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.41), asn: 8560(2.49), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 17:53:58 -0000 On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:45:54 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2019, Polytropon wrote: > > > > > Sadly, I don't have a spare "slot-in" optical unit for the R61i, > > so it would be interesting to see if a different drive would lead > > to a change of results... > > > > > My long (but older) experience with advising people who have trouble > burning DVDs is to burn at half the rate (supposedly) supported by the > burner and DVD. That almost always cures the problem. Vendors are just a > tad optimistic. Yes, I regularly do this. DVDs usually at 2x speed, CDs at 8x speed. In the past, I experimented with maximum speed, and found out that in several cases, the CDs has problems playing in CD players. The recording time doesn't matter to me, I want something usable. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 18:05:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A28A15D66B5 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@cretaforce.gr) Received: from smtp1.cretaforce.gr (smtp1.cretaforce.gr [159.69.10.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.cretaforce.gr", Issuer "RapidSSL RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7DD961BB for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@cretaforce.gr) Received: from server1.cretaforce.gr (server1.cretaforce.gr [138.201.248.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.cretaforce.gr", Issuer "RapidSSL RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by smtp1.cretaforce.gr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE481F445 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:05:14 +0300 (EEST) Received: from christoss-mini.fritz.box (athedsl-4448571.home.otenet.gr [79.129.209.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: chris@cretaforce.gr) by server1.cretaforce.gr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F49C27365 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:05:14 +0300 (EEST) From: Christos Chatzaras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: jail issue on vps, daemons dying Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:05:13 +0300 References: <1B8F00EB-7782-4731-958F-335166D636B9@cretaforce.gr> To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BE7DD961BB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of chris@cretaforce.gr designates 159.69.10.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=chris@cretaforce.gr X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.83)[0.827,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.10.232]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cretaforce.gr]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.59)[0.590,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.87)[-0.869,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(0.26)[ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(3.12), asn: 24940(-1.81), country: DE(-0.01)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.cretaforce.gr]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[232.10.69.159.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[43.209.129.79.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:05:24 -0000 > On 23 Jun 2019, at 17:45, David Mehler wrote: >=20 > Hi, > The vps has 4GB of ram, but it's running the host system, which only > runs the jails, and it runs three jails. >=20 > If it's killing processes how do I correct this issue? >=20 > Thanks. > Dave. >=20 Maybe the VPS hypervisor kills processes. Did you find anything related = to this in the logs?= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 19:00:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009EB15D7609 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C496806A for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1911315D7606; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB1615D7605 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0F268068 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id q26so8432620lfc.3 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:00:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VKpQHRnBs0WUtw5HkvmpvkeI4z9586F0O7PHZ3aCW/8=; b=ShOlopXMc9l6FNLaHTCNbGjkpyi7SqRiyAMHHfPB0f1ScwUz2jLcTu6dYDvWhyI9ha w5MWW9xH4JDD/2hLO32unIv/B9xVANNZyjpumYCwu2usvi/MetNFAox3RPI75/PIsaz3 i8/yOxpYvnlXdHrlx/xfnFqgG6ysNxohxmHqfKUpcvkx6Mp1CYYZQbrKWb9qhfNKWJ7n VaJvK2pFO6E1g01od7Z/KjYD4oi/kcrxOq/JXwT+fRAxIFfTpyKRnh0LoZ/j5gIKy1yu kALAEFQ2pcEkQXEKwm12dImWxqMhgVr/cW4pXOq4b3hB15tH8RfALf0Cfe0Pb1ubjc9O ByhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VKpQHRnBs0WUtw5HkvmpvkeI4z9586F0O7PHZ3aCW/8=; b=on1+PMQAInKaRcFDHpda5U/2TWECwWHmDMGG8bgMyIblOgCeZT31xN053jm/w0wlKv YKI+29hyFx74dzwZkjPgWupYjRev+Cc1lomtbOIhiby4CxIcBMDKWA0+r27X/Nh//cBj 3RqBfaWdzkArpaLTh0JR623Ze7Fnqqzro1+xh+V7lOAllmlc0JYzY59hqlBLnrqgvpvy 3t+muZx2REsH6xXQCBw1lBMOaENGvhSgTur1SiwCanBjJhfBG9H/DF9yWqKMmLChbaJ+ Ve7qyjP6o6U7zgpx1rq198UozxGsW/r7McXy3JFI9MNYnHLtIXaVxgLBGzyYTv65lth8 NtUw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvDUrxGgsLYxujDIldC5d+F3NF7AxjvJTMkiRaZZZH1ERja4yW Cjod+Pir1LRSVif74ME0r03EZXzTwdtmkuDi3FY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw9tOtpQby43QubyZNI77CGNYRFZjvD0BgiExnIkD4JiY4pBUBWTP5AQ1UzjNVNvYveqwsH8OiEa0p1Mo0wtBs= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4303:: with SMTP id l3mr18001413lfh.107.1561316416303; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:00:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190623125728.sdrgitlmb53ktuk4@mail.emuadmin.com> In-Reply-To: <20190623125728.sdrgitlmb53ktuk4@mail.emuadmin.com> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:59:37 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: local_unbound not working To: Emilian Ursu Cc: questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5E0F268068 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.95 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.954,0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:00:21 -0000 Hi Emilian, In both cases, my forward.conf contains the same entries: 1.0.0.1, 8.8.4.4 and 8.8.8.8. There is no difference and I don't understand why using these values in /etc/resolv.conf works while using my LAN IP in resolv.conf (because unbound is bound to my LAN IP) doesn't work. Even running local_unbound with -vvvv still isn't giving me any clues. Ever heard of getting stumped? This is it! On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 16:00, Emilian Ursu wrote: > Hi, > > by default local_unbound requires DNSSEC and will fail if upstream doesn't > support it. > You can check by commenting out auto-trust-anchor-file in > /var/unbound/unbound.conf > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I have a system which is an exact replica of the other except for the DNS > > names and IP addresses. > > The system is FreeBSD-12. > > Now, on the original system, local_unbound is working perfectly for name > > resolutions. > > On the replica, name resolution is not working. > > I have edited the IPs correctly in unbound.conf, resolv.conf, rc.conf - > > every other place I can think of. > > What would cause this failure?? > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > > Nairobi,KE > > +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 > > "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-) > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 21:07:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E215415DB3DB for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodbrian77@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd41.google.com (mail-io1-xd41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C81C6FEA5 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodbrian77@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd41.google.com with SMTP id e5so154631iok.4 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:07:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dLWxoh7XuHbqgXdZmFHedH0NQbDhsp0eRHRjTb9FIvk=; b=N0tsl44Zhpmbzr3KvGRmk0SNb6Ujpu9MiBfw6m2W3yQwcJd32IrGcaqZYzmVqS4y4u to1gyC9ydCQ4zJAg4SbbBjBwt6fHR2X06wrCKjOPmydGO2Ovw4vgvcAK0ZZK2Mel+V7J bHZCs5jZ379+Z6n4s17xmn/k+tWmqfAEwf1wTrMcc7H6oI2e8+QbuHNHJUg2Kth74sDB F3h2gsejGgQD1KkZZOKLzSRMV2S1sTqd2jew8nKL6YAUrRCsaVIDZ3hg45ZGBxofCmZE 4bEYilmtpSNe8EstGGHNcavl0WWMR0b7gT+uONU0r4gcPXI7CV+3MYgslBQa720uGQLz uxaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dLWxoh7XuHbqgXdZmFHedH0NQbDhsp0eRHRjTb9FIvk=; b=boJTTnWc7Ng9FilnxsYLP4IMB7otrN42xwuWle4gXKCjjSUGlli9XDJHEGu5P+gROl cThAHaXRnw/j8Z2ysBrmmVsvr4ZhW7zGPuiQQLrb81goiCGrHNj6kBw28B0+0aUcGRBl mJbl384qMzha5VEB9mL0YnrjJNtjr/V0GRPuN7LsdmtjCzOaHT2/qYYWSXO57LCrwkeo ZqgdoKu808q6gTqIa1P+58dHChlBcK6eOw7dZhczi/xaQzK5RpXWcjuVNCyOaAnqoTcR W44Uyi1ECE97yGvqZAiGGYZ2rMNSmzN+Ipm7+RHI8Eo9AOTYmqG6lkMOjPfXSO2p/Tre /meA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+ou3xmJGwHuqxX67jAVO0PYyzOTkaNUDGDqbkXRM4bhVOjOVT fYeeb9pEZPCqCCTzYcg8AUVI4p79VNAiFazDYuA43CKC X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwDiVdvJrJZNnDDHI956/0yGxqih1Xa2wD34Mbydo8TMR+IpEPzUnn/ORu/bZYw+GRzm3B+PJIGq+rmh86Dcas= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8f86:: with SMTP id l6mr12317055iol.97.1561324036196; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:07:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Brian Wood Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 16:07:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) To: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0C81C6FEA5 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=N0tsl44Z; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of woodbrian77@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=woodbrian77@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.93 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[5]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.13)[-0.126,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.957,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.83)[ip: (1.36), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.14), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.4.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 21:07:18 -0000 Freddie Cash writes: > > You've been given the tools to do exactly what you want: > - comment out IPv6 support in the kernel config file > - add WITHOUT_IPV6=yes to /etc/src.conf > - rebuild the world and kernel I'm interested in this subject as an entrepreneur with a boutique on-line service. I followed the above and it boots and 'netstat -r' no longer says anything about IPv6. I found section 23.5.1 on this page: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html to be confusing. I'm not sure if that is out of date, but the 'make -j4 kernel' is different than make buildkernel and it says to reboot before running 'make installworld'. I'm not sure if it matters but I did 'make buildkernel ...' before 'make buildworld'. Then I installed both and then rebooted. I tried to get away with just rebuilding the kernel and installing that, but that didn't work. Anyway, I'm glad I was able to do this and bring it up in the hope that ground-up entrepreneurs will not be dismissed by FreeBSD. IPv6 is a headache for mom & pop shops. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 22:12:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D13D15B33C9 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.107.128.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2EA72765 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C13919B512 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5NMCldK059447 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:12:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x5NMClEZ059444 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:12:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:12:46 -0400 (EDT) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7A2EA72765 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.50 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[doug@safeport.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[fledge2.watson.org,cyrus.watson.org]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(2.51)[ip: (6.68), ipnet: 204.107.128.0/24(3.34), asn: 11288(2.60), country: US(-0.06)]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11288, ipnet:204.107.128.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.998,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[watson.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.997,0]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[30.128.107.204.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:12:54 -0000 On Sun, 23 Jun 2019, Brian Wood wrote: > Freddie Cash writes: >> >> You've been given the tools to do exactly what you want: >> - comment out IPv6 support in the kernel config file >> - add WITHOUT_IPV6=yes to /etc/src.conf >> - rebuild the world and kernel > > I'm interested in this subject as an entrepreneur with > a boutique on-line service. I followed the above and > it boots and 'netstat -r' no longer says anything about > IPv6. > I found section 23.5.1 on this page: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html > > to be confusing. I'm not sure if that is out of date, but > the 'make -j4 kernel' > is different than make buildkernel > and it says to reboot before running 'make installworld'. > > I'm not sure if it matters but I did 'make buildkernel ...' > before 'make buildworld'. Then I installed both and > then rebooted. I tried to get away with just rebuilding > the kernel and installing that, but that didn't work. > > Anyway, I'm glad I was able to do this and bring it up > in the hope that ground-up entrepreneurs will not be > dismissed by FreeBSD. IPv6 is a headache for mom > & pop shops. I've got a bit of a different take on this. It seems to me that starting with the rewrite of the network stack to remove the giant (right term??) lock and making almost all drivers available via kldload the goal has been to remove the necessity to compile your own kernel (at least for guys like me). I'm more of a [grand] mom and pop shop, anyway, I can not find any left over files to clue me as to when I last compiled a kernel. Given all platforms and difficulty in debugging all the variability of having a billion or so packets arrive randomly on systems with 1-32 cores and different processor speeds I am happiest running the code that is the most used. Maybe the theory of correctness makes debugging better than when I was doing this s--t. If so links would be much appreciated. I use sshguard with inetd on jails and IPFW on the hosts and can see no measurable overhead with inetd much less IPFW. All my servers run only internet services of some sort so in processor time it's days maybe months (relatively speaking) between network interrups. So unless one is doing some processor heavy application that also has a real-time response requirement I do not see that much benefit from compiling a kernel just to get rid of IPV6 packets. As someone pointed out we can not be sure our "friendly" IPSs maybe sending them our way. Note even though there are not any "?" in this, it is essentially a long question. Thanks for any comments, thoughts, ... Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jun 23 22:21:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A47915B3807 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com) Received: from mail.tridentusa.com (mail.tridentusa.com [96.225.19.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D993272BBC for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:21:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com) Received: (qmail 85602 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2019 22:15:04 -0000 Received: from mail.tridentusa.com (172.16.0.32) de/crypted with TLSv1: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA [256/256] DN=none by smtprelay.tridentusa.com with ESMTPS; 23 Jun 2019 22:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 10715 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2019 18:15:04 -0400 Received: from pool-108-53-192-121.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net (HELO ?192.168.1.156?) (jjohnstone@tridentusa.com@108.53.192.121) by mail.tridentusa.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2019 18:15:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Problem burning DVD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190622090010.65724d79.freebsd@edvax.de> <20190623054527.da1435d0.freebsd@edvax.de> From: John Johnstone Message-ID: <46616668-bcbe-a280-69e6-5e160aba2e7d@tridentusa.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:15:00 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190623054527.da1435d0.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D993272BBC X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com designates 96.225.19.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.94 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tridentusa.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail1.tridentusa.com,mail.tridentusa.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.65)[ip: (-9.53), ipnet: 96.225.0.0/17(-4.77), asn: 701(1.12), country: US(-0.06)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:96.225.0.0/17, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 22:21:48 -0000 On 6/22/19 11:45 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:09:20 -0400 (EDT), Chris Hill wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Polytropon wrote: >> >> [ big snip ] >> >>> Is there some description of what error codes like "Error 22", "0x16" >>> or "SK=4h/ASC=03h/ACQ=00h" mean? >> ^^^^^^^ >> The first thing that popped into my head was that 03h (alias 0x03) is >> the ASCii character ETX, meaning of course 'end of text.' Could there be >> some issue with the file you're writing from? > > Interesting find! Yes, I remember the ASCII table's control > codes, and "ASC" could mean exactly that, "ASCII Code"; maybe > ACQ is "ASCII Queue"? And SK? No idea. I'd be interested if > there is a reference list somewhere that would explain the > codes and the values. These are SCSI protocol terms. SK - Sense Key ASC - Additional Sense Code ACQ or ASCQ is Additional Sense Code Qualifier SK=4h/ASC=03h/ACQ=00h is fairly generic. 4 03 00 - Hardware Error - write fault https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_Code_Qualifier http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm Manufacturers also add their own proprietary codes to this list. - John J. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 04:52:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A779C15C1FE8 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 04:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3916F85817 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 04:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.12.43.126]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MLRgp-1hxcnZ1NrP-00IV8c; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:52:34 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:52:33 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Brian Wood Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) Message-Id: <20190624065233.fb5f72f4.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:uTp03k+8RjnLJcENGyzn3/YmCG/Jg3Pl7cejmBewQt431RSHXWd OwqWMi5wzMczvCxbmYGJoLWPcHYSXb+69avw9Pof8P7UMzGO76dwOgOzDub7+1qJrmzCQmV ZsVhEkkM/qI673t/EEFt0FY7tuN2ZT6zDFW0lwfiQYbsgIoCOdXEirI18zyEhNGQ75TZpsN 6E2moGAOhR8hbf2wgbAIQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V4gYWT5KBtM=:YaEQERw5w3C3LfEhg/39+w p8mqT4URvyn9/15I8Db+sIuoerNEFkg++4BuRwhvb+0bvCgSdvQ6ErczvTNsK8vMD30BJ1opO zBAVepXt6BzL+IZaWPVLVRVtqLFBfP2FNci9bprq9cHZXgUj8u7tAOELsHHJLBCRb73m4jiSX wnCoyDmUeGl6nSXSHikUuDseq9oC2rvZeKWEcHLzn0e34EClwu00YXGB3f6G9zB+Xwq5C1Eyw xXRbkSJIfgsissfNvwVQhvjzp2oElvkjMBndyfBXSFwq68560Y6qAlL33pUu7yPDumwp8jypD pootipBC+XdFQZz/gAYb7vIdrKL79uUN+w39w7EaiEipxMHEGTJrH45yzhc78OzJ09xy9HtnL VS4lWeUfICcCGB/MqD8AnAltjUCP7wAf2N8cpz18FKe7AJe3toTyfyge6yN2PVtz5mIRi12Jo S8/sV0dGBKc/q4QrzPs1daTMDjktKHzx9mcpKiLdbC0m4xgvMHB3XCODG/KQlAHa3LYlmYvOn QmGWlbvtMPh7N37eKApWnp/6AnRDPZwBckvUrgzSp9C62NJghbgaKQr1HSQxFdtrKUg0dHL60 Rnfn5+YeMeu4rE2qaWy7eTZwdsi9F6k+cPLg+dn2JaFzt8nyhelpqbR6JEjOAznHg29T3pDLo NIQhmtX6Koq1JnQYsF9R2LLTGZCHSpFj9GIEOSLKuwbQugq/ivHgtUioXoPzXrNkzVBG+iBKE Jk4YcT5tkiPwgRRQH8L04yxGFElVSzHBjpEI9BvSxDpQeQxCsCOAbWCeDPs= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3916F85817 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.15 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx01.schlund.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[126.43.12.178.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.98)[0.979,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.978,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[133.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.80)[ip: (2.93), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.41), asn: 8560(2.49), country: DE(-0.01)] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 04:52:40 -0000 On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 16:07:05 -0500, Brian Wood wrote: > I'm interested in this subject as an entrepreneur with > a boutique on-line service. I followed the above and > it boots and 'netstat -r' no longer says anything about > IPv6. > I found section 23.5.1 on this page: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html > > to be confusing. I'm not sure if that is out of date, but > the 'make -j4 kernel' > is different than make buildkernel > and it says to reboot before running 'make installworld'. Refer to /usr/src/Makefile's comment header where you will find a short explanation of the different targets. make kernel: This target performs both "make buildkernel" and "make installkernel". It's possible to run this command in multi-user mode and then reboot into the new kernel. It's neccessary that world and kernel are in sync version-wise. make buildkernel: This target builds the kernel, but does not install it. make buildworld: This target builds the world, but does not install it. make installkernel: This target installs the kernel. It can be done in single-user and multi-user mode. make installworld: This is a very special target. It requires that you have booted the appropriate kernel, the ("old") world / OS in single-user mode, and performed basic file system checks manually (as this is not done automatically for single-user mode!). Before and after this step, tools such as mergemaster can (and should) be used. Here's a short summary (from the source mentioned above): # For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a # delta of a few days): # # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). # 2. `make buildworld' # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). # 6. `mergemaster -p' # 7. `make installworld' # 8. `make delete-old' # 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). # 10. `reboot' # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) Also see "man 7 build" for further documentation. So the choice of the correct target and procedure depends on the actual goal you want to achieve. > I'm not sure if it matters but I did 'make buildkernel ...' > before 'make buildworld'. Then I installed both and > then rebooted. I tried to get away with just rebuilding > the kernel and installing that, but that didn't work. The build order usually does not matter, but the install order does, and the environment in which it takes place. COmparing your approach with the procedure mentioned above, you can see that it's not supposed to work as expected. Therefore, revise your procedure. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 05:13:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B5115C2923 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 05:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498CA8626F for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 05:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.12.43.126]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue009 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1N7zJj-1ibNg82TEh-0155TO; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:13:31 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:13:30 +0200 From: Polytropon To: John Johnstone Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem burning DVD Message-Id: <20190624071330.435d71d0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <46616668-bcbe-a280-69e6-5e160aba2e7d@tridentusa.com> References: <20190622090010.65724d79.freebsd@edvax.de> <20190623054527.da1435d0.freebsd@edvax.de> <46616668-bcbe-a280-69e6-5e160aba2e7d@tridentusa.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:m/46QmFOnufCnLEG559YQ0DcC4G1WZ/Dbto5QLofp51jmquujZ3 aX7dOwK47pcyPVyS798ICNUevfiU3VqdQ/o4N1YUJ5Id//2vk4DvQlMFB7fO+u2Tr49bIMS Em8C0fFwRuzuBGLEq5tNs+wNBt+WH1upzt19QiTyYptHxFoitOqTFzSJAlghsyT8ttiLVcb CJ62RX1IZ+kT5q5Q22rFw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:9ZOhSnd/8Tc=:t5j1F2n3i9F6qsMe3Yt90V OiX+n1KGhKMBRuQBlJYD6DRy/YfVkxVbSkj8PMarOUx80mN38U1zGmRkw0ijimWaeObz2R8sm Yp3I4KO03DXIcGjKrp1af9MEST954B8D9IQTH+e2lFieAV/PLmMlOWCMBtq4C4Y0NcRmxNz0g aBj5/DRQrYDYtmLFiA19grspttJ9RwGaVtWwzFGVdJ1dUyJUt7nsD9+CEaR5bpQ5Ru0mPUNuv hT5eRdhKhmgras48kbmq1E8rX4SpkGtiCMJaP0vOyUpDDXsKLRS5ifXBTox75cXB5bE63oPqg DFDO0rpop9pgXV3zM3SgbFOeFq5CpYmeh83OmwCAsjsxQXqYHXiaZoiOE/2N17BTbZrapQEdt EiUh0IIk8HR4f2Hj9EYkVf6v5cQl2Hqu6QzpEHs9T1SMPXSK02UI0O0kwxIVEWkbdgWNdX2Tt 6/G0kwgeoB73tnNFWz8dfclGzjOj++XVYOZo+bOZdkiLgQ5t4uUo6MLPYJr8jOQN3pn6cYtc+ //3b8+XPfb+9+wcb7ZhScV3PKfJX9SZijg3d9Djt3V/5u/RMbAo84Y7VqYsMFnd5Mqt8Vd0ak CpEJ7sE+3nbt1G0BM/GW7KzdjdYY7vSGN4A+wNxrbrjPJyBcSmADRPMXz7QdCh1eW3nT8+tpq uZ2AWFqD7200fkkBEGG6CYUYHAvOxBboZZzOOjgL99bEfYz5hE+CHolrG/+LG/5u0xaUMteck SESLJ3MSx8JrgHnRAiEqa1KR4u4JHrPpf1dKkxg9tsCKnI84Yr0SR8FxmBs= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 498CA8626F X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.22 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx01.schlund.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[126.43.12.178.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.992,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.989,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[130.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[130.126.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.85)[ip: (3.17), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.40), asn: 8560(2.49), country: DE(-0.01)] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 05:13:43 -0000 On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:15:00 -0400, John Johnstone wrote: > On 6/22/19 11:45 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:09:20 -0400 (EDT), Chris Hill wrote: > >> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Polytropon wrote: > >> > >> [ big snip ] > >> > >>> Is there some description of what error codes like "Error 22", "0x16" > >>> or "SK=4h/ASC=03h/ACQ=00h" mean? > >> ^^^^^^^ > >> The first thing that popped into my head was that 03h (alias 0x03) is > >> the ASCii character ETX, meaning of course 'end of text.' Could there be > >> some issue with the file you're writing from? > > > > Interesting find! Yes, I remember the ASCII table's control > > codes, and "ASC" could mean exactly that, "ASCII Code"; maybe > > ACQ is "ASCII Queue"? And SK? No idea. I'd be interested if > > there is a reference list somewhere that would explain the > > codes and the values. > > These are SCSI protocol terms. > > SK - Sense Key > ASC - Additional Sense Code > ACQ or ASCQ is Additional Sense Code Qualifier > > SK=4h/ASC=03h/ACQ=00h is fairly generic. > > 4 03 00 - Hardware Error - write fault > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_Code_Qualifier > http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm Many thanks for this pointer! This is very good reference material. After the transition from ATAPI to ATAPICAM and "everything talks SCSI" this unifies the error reporting for several kinds of devices. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 06:02:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B4915C3A3D for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046B9877DC for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90B261F82 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:02:38 +0700 (+07) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received:received :received; s=selector1; t=1561356158; x=1563170559; bh=PBUjea5/Q p3vNoma2FiTJdzZ3AzQPp4OTTihQWCuXDs=; b=IUPpTUvIK/S9LEkF3GZOTAEZB ZnKsfP6wJSSrD5dvIcy9O0cK10MChUw5r01nIa8nRmxs5DzmlyuCQCPsmcHrYyv4 BsYFickEtVLbj+y6+bVQz+fc1dFFGB7EIte+uh7ZKix9QCHaGDwpp3SAofeTKkBV 7GVebxAs3MnY+2lGzU= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id zQhwBMdbmvNq for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:02:38 +0700 (+07) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D94461F81 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:02:37 +0700 (+07) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5O62atY019201; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:02:36 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) From: Olivier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cleaning emailUSB WiFi adapter for FreeBSD 10.3 In-Reply-To: <200908071142.n77BgWKF034276@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> (message from Olivier Nicole on Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:42:32 +0700 (ICT)) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:02:34 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 046B9877DC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cs.ait.ac.th header.s=selector1 header.b=IUPpTUvI; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=cs.ait.ac.th; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th designates 192.41.170.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.56 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cs.ait.ac.th:s=selector1]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(0.00)[cs.ait.ac.th.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.02)[country: TH(0.09)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.12)[0.120,0]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cs.ait.ac.th:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[16.170.41.192.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[cs.ait.ac.th,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.cs.ait.ac.th]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4767, ipnet:192.41.170.0/24, country:TH]; RBL_COMPOSITE_RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED_DWL_DNSWL_MED(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 06:02:56 -0000 Hello, I am looking for an USB WiFi adapter that would work with my FreeBSD 10.3. preferably something readily available online. And before you tell me to upgrade, this is a pfSense box, upgrading is not a solution. Alternatively, I have one adapter that is recognized as product 0xc811 vendor 0x0bda (Realtek), but the system has no proper driver for it, so if I could get driver, that could be a workable solution. TIA, Olivier -- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 08:28:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE1915C6C93 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 08:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=y/yp=UX=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from orval.bbpf.belspo.be (orval.bbpf.belspo.be [193.191.208.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB178B9A6 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 08:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=y/yp=UX=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from home.lan (213.219.189.54.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net [213.219.189.54]) by orval.bbpf.belspo.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 529651D500FB; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:28:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:28:40 +0200 From: Julien Cigar To: mike tancsa Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS replication suggestions Message-ID: <20190624082840.GB92534@home.lan> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0BB178B9A6 X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=y/yp=UX=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be designates 193.191.208.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=y/yp=UX=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.72 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[perdition.city]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.bebif.be,mx2.bebif.be]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[90.208.191.193.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.973,0]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[julien@perdition.city,SRS0=y/yp=UX=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[54.189.219.213.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2611, ipnet:193.191.192.0/19, country:BE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[julien@perdition.city,SRS0=y/yp=UX=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be]; IP_SCORE(-2.74)[ip: (-8.46), ipnet: 193.191.192.0/19(-4.23), asn: 2611(-1.01), country: BE(-0.00)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 08:28:50 -0000 --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:25:20PM -0400, mike tancsa wrote: > I have a new project coming up with replication.=C2=A0 In the past, I have > used various scripts out of ports, but was wondering what people are > using these days to sync their ZFS files systems between servers ?=C2=A0 = It > will be about 10-40G in daily diffs.=C2=A0 Would like to send every 5-10 = min > or so. Files being slightly out of sync for a short period of time is > not a big deal eg. in case of total failure on one box (e.g both power > supplies die) missing some data for a period of short time is tolerable I'm using a combination of: zpool over local + iSCSI disks, and zrep to snahpshot + sync every hour to remote host >=20 > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ---Mike >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE7vn2l0to0nV7EWolsrs3EKIEI8AFAl0QibgACgkQsrs3EKIE I8CIzxAAvdkwEeMQXJ+Exr+aMK4LXoM2UD7io986dP5dDRjG2MeDW616/YluHecw VzzH7cpZ4rPgmsHe1Zcji779gOfwbp5MzDpOxZ6QGNf8ebkiE3HaAUKMquhlLxQn ov0GDAtb5p1uVSes/PDizBH8pF2+A1l+V5qDWxrjJpsyHo2DwnhKsKQLBWE5FVHJ NWfiGUsrOINKhsmaQzzgc4sgAR5AyxJkvJyMgPe2EQ4RqcBXbsO9VkJMf4oe8FX5 USpJ7t5TRMqUN+7wpsabxyZagSG8D70qE7GlYkLpiD1yfPc2wnVinl6yZMIQP8rl K4a7AYLoUTzqwthmml4udWrozVa2x5Ucay85F++RO/Wnk0iC86w/XTrZ+SecwX20 EVGkoWgngx7z/DjVfRmnBr/bbBCu/txgs8kSFh/4onAw30vnls6kWcVPPbS8Uss1 juSJ6q7tyjHGviVUGCosbZXEsY4ZNnfY33ISfApQoiYdLSH6LK00gg/XGwTm5MdV X8z5cz2mMKw/J8b0WymdLGLNA/PPrrjkx4NTKuZ88jccBqSb33mHhiFJsNN2thE+ rQeLKL6yV9XVOqPbi90FZ+GIucWcv0V/uFAcqy15HQLox9DCyKvmVNy/GnXRDE+9 TcyWMGK0qNpumE9TIm8M6pKsZ0JyfzRwiwG0WEarpKfP9/2pZ2s= =N0dS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 09:06:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C798C15C7C1D for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-cmomta01.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9952F8CBED for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.161.151]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id fKvzhmr2OP088fKw2hXeQX; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:06:47 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:06:35 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: Olivier Subject: Re: Re: Cleaning emailUSB WiFi adapter for FreeBSD 10.3 References: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIzwDpjE4tf1eUeJju/Serl3F0xSMtIsDZWdaNnfrZGiMj667OG6/NxJYzZ+c3Ix6NhpCM8UR8Yh2/xCUqmDKQbzxmt3N2rs20f4QPJSQPCN+qyuYVB7 edG3dE3C8j3yTELML41luskAHWFHHMA3mtMAp7ByqRJ4340CDRH2xJgqGQDqUaxhtRY1iqpR9f8eUqrv3XVeifi8FsiQk424p7E= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9952F8CBED X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 107.14.73.229 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.24 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.14.73.0/24]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: dnvrco-cmedge02.email.rr.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[229.73.14.107.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.957,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[151.161.28.96.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7843, ipnet:107.14.73.0/24, country:US]; IP_SCORE(-2.47)[ip: (-6.20), ipnet: 107.14.73.0/24(-3.39), asn: 7843(-2.72), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:06:55 -0000 > I am looking for an USB WiFi adapter that would work with my FreeBSD > 10.3. preferably something readily available online. > And before you tell me to upgrade, this is a pfSense box, upgrading is > not a solution. > Alternatively, I have one adapter that is recognized as product 0xc811 > vendor 0x0bda (Realtek), but the system has no proper driver for it, so > if I could get driver, that could be a workable solution. > TIA, > Olivier I use Hiro H50191 USB WiFi adapter with FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE, believe it worked with 10.3, seems to work with FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE when booted in UEFI mode. I haven't shopped recently so don't know how readily available Hiro (hiroinc.com) H50191 is now. This adapter does not work with NetBSD. FreeBSD driver is rsu. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 17:55:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA1D15D41DB; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF7680567; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id e5so2826112iok.4; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:55:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4MRRmDNpSzX7dEAYkWo+JP5lH0ho+lsVneTDmGxAODc=; b=q8qTu9gMbTGIgi+my+G2d7X2Hey/s97J6AZa021bhvQX0TKVUHcxu3FIR4ACUKJhvo H4If+b+H5Uw55o4r8rDfAS8f7wj6wmudINsk+KzryQj6M8LphyBzpZrCpd07wV1jLma6 TyxaSd6V+0SUbo2GMxZoCtIE1Q6zGkCQRxVXuU6VPThy/LYrd5Gp4cjk34QpHSnxCdjA C33KEIZx3mkG49aZX34NsB1STE3jcYPP2WHDl18GLmuF5euhTL6mX/tOv+sMiUTTOg9H 4rkAI68G24ngtr0Ic7wBXDcx5NyzBLezkLcmkHaD04iSGiQcJkvrji4+6Nj2nMM2dQhi fE8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4MRRmDNpSzX7dEAYkWo+JP5lH0ho+lsVneTDmGxAODc=; b=mBMxrH4kUbPbSdHboU8vZukJ8FzVbGqLDKtnj1GZwhw0fwv2Pa/6pjQON7JFW7yTZq IaOElVQ7pM0SFQ3c8cqonKXb4rl/Uw9UMhdxgiV9SN/Oh8KC9bu6G7OPt43N2UXBYWKq +kBTq/v1ZeMbRjO7x4owgZ/trAIhkK6YknGaUplS46yC73hccvn9khbmTTcmxf3kzF8h HCUg7ozLYfiEo4VmroQL7sMtKNeRnJcTHhtf4a9PKqDcOvm3PhzyCc1zEWub6BrjGdLo xCoQzavIimqcx/FWXvzFEmz8SS9SHhnXUluP67I1QA96ZBrEkEIzCgjmWMGdSTcTlSlK QZgg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVI5WiKUMAnappdYlNoRQm5VjcbARyZF8hhTsr7vFCUrIqzVPUx jp/H9PGhofRO/wyKAxInd0t9vHTWRELCvP0Lo1Ost5fH X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5/J+1vEA9InCXgsA6v2RtYV7VpYjCE6CcUkva9kRVWExPP1OC8sQYB77qfMbzyGFUxRVGWXGeG/Re3i/XP70= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8f9a:: with SMTP id l26mr3474553iol.22.1561398937297; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:55:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:212a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:55:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20190618235535.GY32970@gmail.com> From: grarpamp Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:55:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CVE-2019-5599 SACK Slowness (FreeBSD 12 using the RACK TCP Stack) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jtl@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2EF7680567 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=q8qTu9gM; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grarpamp@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grarpamp@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.85 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-0.85)[ip: (1.27), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.15), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.06)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.4.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:55:39 -0000 On 6/18/19, grarpamp wrote: > https://github.com/Netflix/security-bulletins/blob/master/advisories/third-party/2019-001.md > As it is not in the current .md, when was the issue > discovered by Netflix / Looney? One week has gone by, so asking again... When was the issue discovered by Netflix / Looney? When did FreeBSD become aware of the issue? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 18:32:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B79215D5D6D for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netsecurity@sound-by-design.com) Received: from lhvm02.lizardhill.com (lhvm02.lizardhill.com [64.27.2.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46065827BB for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netsecurity@sound-by-design.com) Received: from [76.217.50.227] (helo=[192.168.2.4]) by lhvm02.lizardhill.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hfTl8-0007H9-Fd for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:32:06 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: Allen Schaaf Subject: I've got a major question... Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:32:02 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 190624-2, 06/24/2019), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Authenticated-Id: netsecurity@sound-by-design.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46065827BB X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of netsecurity@sound-by-design.com designates 64.27.2.117 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=netsecurity@sound-by-design.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.75 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sound-by-design.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.54)[0.540,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.65)[asn: 35916(3.32), country: US(-0.06)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.46)[0.461,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.sound-by-design.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.40)[0.404,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[117.2.27.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35916, ipnet:64.27.0.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:32:15 -0000 Hi, whomever you'll are, I've got a major question. I'm the President of the Board of Directors of a very small credit union, it's certified to help the lower income people, as well as being their tech support person - I'm a retired Information Security Analyst - and we are up against a major problem. As of the first of 2020 we are required to upgrade to Windows 10, which I hate, because Microsoft will no longer be supporting Windows 7. this also means we will have to replace a couple of our computers as well. I would like to do what some of the people in  Scandinavian countries have done, move to open source programs like FreeBSD, Libre Office and Filezilla, or any combination that can be made to work well together. Currently we are using Filezilla on Windows 7 and it does a great job. The issues are that we have to be able to connect to external systems, corporate credit unions, ADP payroll, Mercury Mod (record keeping) and our burglar alarm system as well as a couple of other smaller systems. I'm not sure about how to go about making sure that the system we will operate at our end will connect to their end so I'm looking for some help and advice. Alas, we don't have much spare money as our "profit" in a good year is less than $65,000 which needs to be reserved for potential future bad years to cover bankruptcies and other problems. Part of my goal is to create a working system that we can help other small credit unions move to to help them survive the potential upcoming economic downturn. Can you suggest people to connect to as well as a path forward? Thanks, Allen Schaaf Retired CISSP, CEH, CHFI, CEI, CSCA Project Manager for Information Security - Business Process - Business Continuity - Supply Chain Optimization - Training & Instructional Designer - Sr. Writer & Documentation Developer - Certified Network Security Analyst & Intrusion Forensics Investigator - Certified EC-Council Instructor Oh, Lord and Master Time who governs our every step, show us the path and grant us the time for joy; joy sublime, joy without reason, joy that we share, joy without end.... --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 19:12:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D2415D6B27 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodbrian77@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6D783E60 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodbrian77@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id e5so3340639iok.4 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:12:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kNaAQZml5SRSCKYS6AVz8AtSc9RVlUrrzRVVRTST92Y=; b=pSVykC1esfMIUXvQ2l2+AlUUf2Z+tK8gThvIwEOexritKiB7Zl3F6KOBUti78hEVWA rjAyszQQtiC8Mdn87J1yorL/aVsHgZ0RoLyYJEMAx10qiu1OrMIWo+cRDoIf+1C47+0Z NLXo/M+4KlCyzudQq34tu9oJHcvsPFec60fRZjFliUnmgN4VWX51WBLudgL9grl/Wsj0 e8RGMEAZFFxmnXwqOJ9VKUGnRjCnJmeXDfQHxhVW/lf7+RoVinBEC9rMX9aekUHVr3o2 ONn0w7CdF+ZK/l8zOtsXHQ4mEU9vwdN8Ym66rSpbvJoWN274qah3OdFVskqPeC1MLS3b z+TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=kNaAQZml5SRSCKYS6AVz8AtSc9RVlUrrzRVVRTST92Y=; b=OrIln4mglG2EDdpUvxLOZ1zbw9CGwkMKewzu0VgjUiQtilaCdPU/T/M5TNYhGN0C56 V4NkH7O7LvmYbFp3gg6QTXLBv93bJl/zJnBXtiwj1qNYHJnAMnbyMaB2t07IxUpVtNfG w1YqlrA6SNSCHxUC42JHP+WEeHouHc9CrgcgrepG5bcs4+MrER3LHhEjE0aX7h5q7KP8 zHeJP8f2GIU6UP/asSiF6Dk+RgaLLhcEmQmZZwgsGlnyCBOwtGtS0xO0iOVHD+UJ9M5w S6mmY5XI37EgSc20CNOd1y/aGaiSmJmRjDFoYzfk8I+7RB3Vdwii13vqBQFQHviO0dec c1pA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAZwjIxo0JbNUd8G/KltSWScOwr8J7bHsJfS3+QC7FrRsNwqjJ HoXaKURHcoWNayT5EmaRUgWt0n+RLy7X7X517waFQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXbwmHimxTJggTeuDCJGMgDdD7KsSLHA018ZlR1Wsm8ayDYw0OA4VBaOF+NdEY+q227rHSax9BpXvL7pdS/gU= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8f86:: with SMTP id l6mr17060181iol.97.1561403558846; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:12:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190624065233.fb5f72f4.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20190624065233.fb5f72f4.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Brian Wood Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:12:27 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) To: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CA6D783E60 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pSVykC1e; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of woodbrian77@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=woodbrian77@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.80 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.909,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.88)[ip: (-8.85), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.15), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[f.2.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:12:41 -0000 On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:52 PM Polytropon wrote: > Refer to /usr/src/Makefile's comment header where you will find > a short explanation of the different targets. > > make kernel: > This target performs both "make buildkernel" and > "make installkernel". It's possible to run this > command in multi-user mode and then reboot into > the new kernel. It's neccessary that world and > kernel are in sync version-wise. > > make buildkernel: > This target builds the kernel, but does not install > it. > > make buildworld: > This target builds the world, but does not install > it. > > make installkernel: > This target installs the kernel. It can be done > in single-user and multi-user mode. > > make installworld: > This is a very special target. It requires that > you have booted the appropriate kernel, the ("old") > world / OS in single-user mode, and performed basic > file system checks manually (as this is not done > automatically for single-user mode!). Before and > after this step, tools such as mergemaster can (and > should) be used. > Here's a short summary (from the source mentioned above): > > # For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a > # delta of a few days): > # > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source > tree). > # 2. `make buildworld' > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is > GENERIC). > # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is > GENERIC). > # [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] > # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader > prompt). > # 6. `mergemaster -p' > # 7. `make installworld' > # 8. `make delete-old' > # 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or > -F). > # 10. `reboot' > # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them > anymore) > > Also see "man 7 build" for further documentation. > > Thanks. The above steps make more sense to me now. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 22:02:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A0515DABCB for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426C38B266 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix, from userid 1237) id 7EA374E64C; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2213.1561413756.1@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:02:36 -0700 Message-ID: <2214.1561413756@segfault.tristatelogic.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 426C38B266 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rfg@tristatelogic.com designates 69.62.255.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rfg@tristatelogic.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.09 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tristatelogic.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.tristatelogic.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.91)[ip: (-7.64), ipnet: 69.62.128.0/17(-3.82), asn: 14051(-3.03), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14051, ipnet:69.62.128.0/17, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:02:39 -0000 I was looking at my various UFS filesystems and noticed each one had a .snap directory. I did some small amount of reading about the purpose of these online and was (incorrectly) persuaded that they had relevance only to people using dump/restore for backups which I personally don't use. So I went 'round and deleted each one from each of my UFS filesystems. In short, I bozo'd it. Now I just read the newfs man page, and the description of the -n option, and I see that these .snap directories are needed to support background fsck. So, can I just recreate them all, on my existing USF filesystems, i.e. via mkdir, and then setting the proper owner, group, and permissions? I mean they don't need to appear first in the relevant directory files or anything special like that, do they? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 24 23:57:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B8615DC689 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0086C8DF20 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id a15so16485914qtn.7 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:57:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eM2U7dFOclc/CDYIkXZpwptwIsIo2tQB6x9WK03MEQA=; b=qBE8G3T6GQyPIeSwbTx0tOAykdZpUV9r/IHvdFCaCRjoey6rTgsqMvw/xRDFs7Q4Nw ZBBvs/p0F0iXkVZ0fIFKyStQIR/8k1zkNabQ+nD7KLeyUxzszP7+H4Iz7AODd8OPBAOj Zi+mI7S6JGAbVZLIgzd+HVNAQjWCjjxD3QXTMFGuSRQHV1JrS1l3anAwFfAoinWoXN1+ VmVJA+D4ojAFbBZX1b6BP93LcNm1C9fq5kzG85gD6lQ9kD7g0yW6IIEfzPJGN/1IV8fd CmKUxo4136kFqF5WB5FSXeO4SvTBe9DCau5eHWAGGipuGZ6IeKixWC27/L9QDAqGTAio tf1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eM2U7dFOclc/CDYIkXZpwptwIsIo2tQB6x9WK03MEQA=; b=h/l+M4LK+DPrbSRA96l7puTRfhS+4S+ejl+G+D7JN/RnwX0lanRToS/FdNj9u5XSoi pnyx+gGOYrGdm1wx4Tx9TSRAoFjV/HFwPPgFkxGGDVdn1Vx4EALDlFsmZJs54Qwcz0V6 GalfW2arUaA9BTRITC3GrjEzarz6iFyh73w/1CkiKh6KzldwP2Jmu/kDs6ZxUPsJdGUA arqTE2nTcQ/6VHWcKAbS2gJfV1rrn9wPbuJ2Fvg/9fp1n2ANVp60rIgYLi2NQespI6Ul 5JhBErlzUywEHWxIuZoxwQERxQFjHn6JSGzdpN4ZIERbpf1xaiCLVMOinTBlsME6Q7pa WLQg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWEafalwfXMfccEpBH95K7EP591hHGoE8Ua4RY56DhmbOkwDyvs SvEV2ZLz1KruF7+c/KBoY4jWwHa+EONGM5aGCQS4AP+Q1JF0Lg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPN71vJqRNv46XrwHeKMmhvDXhhL2NkZcmRTJOXWqBZLCtUzL0JngjaRyaGFrdINYRIhelek7Q1h67P7KVggg= X-Received: by 2002:aed:2241:: with SMTP id o1mr120280394qtc.233.1561420665301; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:57:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2214.1561413756@segfault.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <2214.1561413756@segfault.tristatelogic.com> From: Michael Sierchio Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:57:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0086C8DF20 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=qBE8G3T6 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.19 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.97)[ip: (-9.30), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.15), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tenebras.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[alt1.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx2.googlemail.com,alt2.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx3.googlemail.com]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.912,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:57:47 -0000 It's just a directory. mkdir -p /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap chown root:operator /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap chmod 775 /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:05 PM Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I was looking at my various UFS filesystems and noticed each one > had a .snap directory. I did some small amount of reading about the > purpose of these online and was (incorrectly) persuaded that they > had relevance only to people using dump/restore for backups which > I personally don't use. So I went 'round and deleted each one from > each of my UFS filesystems. > > In short, I bozo'd it. > > Now I just read the newfs man page, and the description of the -n option, > and I see that these .snap directories are needed to support background > fsck. > > So, can I just recreate them all, on my existing USF filesystems, i.e. > via mkdir, and then setting the proper owner, group, and permissions? > I mean they don't need to appear first in the relevant directory files > or anything special like that, do they? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 "Well," Brahm=C4=81 said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is = no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mah=C4=81bh=C4=81rata From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 00:14:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5165D15DD17F for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0738E9B1 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix, from userid 1237) id B4D9B4E64C; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:14:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: Michael Sierchio cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2871.1561421679.1@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:14:39 -0700 Message-ID: <2872.1561421679@segfault.tristatelogic.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6F0738E9B1 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rfg@tristatelogic.com designates 69.62.255.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rfg@tristatelogic.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tristatelogic.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.tristatelogic.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.960,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.89)[ip: (-7.60), ipnet: 69.62.128.0/17(-3.80), asn: 14051(-3.02), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14051, ipnet:69.62.128.0/17, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:14:42 -0000 In message , you wrote: >It's just a directory. OK. Thanks. I just tend to err on the cautious side, so I had to ask. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 00:48:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756C615DDD6C for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-cmomta01.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5226F8FCF7 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.161.151]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id fZczh60oIP088fZd1hih5O; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:48:07 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:47:52 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? References: <2214.1561413756@segfault.tristatelogic.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNVUIF63MuWVXoEhcevSlOEtAk36JvKvGuHEGsAxpg7r/YHBDuT0rN+yyCl13ZJSXXl+9Z/ktEnhKJv5hzPSy4Gnu9vDQvp5d40WYlYJN/+1QYBWNDjD d8BGoZc6Jo1yY2WF3kkH3SANx+gmXSBiYO1rq/vCn6FhB1fe0Pn2R3nSEMDL3g7CafLf8e1FvshKjw== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5226F8FCF7 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 107.14.73.225 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.14.73.0/24]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988,0]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[dnvrco-cmedge02.email.rr.com,dnvrco-cmedge01.email.rr.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.979,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[225.73.14.107.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-3.04)[ip: (-9.04), ipnet: 107.14.73.0/24(-3.38), asn: 7843(-2.70), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[151.161.28.96.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7843, ipnet:107.14.73.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:48:16 -0000 from Michael Sierchio: > It's just a directory. > mkdir -p /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap > chown root:operator /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap > chmod 775 /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap Where do you get /usr/.snap and /var/.snap ? I have seen /.snap in FreeBSD but never /usr/.snap or /var/.snap . Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 01:34:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBA615B3DA2 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF396A6B8 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B48A61F82; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:34:45 +0700 (+07) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received:received :received; s=selector1; t=1561426485; x=1563240886; bh=hgQZVj0pq wHbl54Xxwf7lLvS0pHPbcMY6aL1pPWIqaA=; b=X3uXmDwmJkd+1M73B6J8Ic3sH GkJ2Fmmhc4FGGMlIsJLBLSGzSsyaTTLuCFnCd6oLYkIFSPJi0cyORURM7saDh1hG h9zfoajzDqM4kMxAppK4lH02UgMt0utPbWxRwlHjNIOkRNWh8hf7AAg0qPro7qbk BGuwbovxwik064Zj40= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EHysyIsgXKgt; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:34:45 +0700 (+07) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2678861F85; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:34:11 +0700 (+07) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5P1Y8h5023951; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:34:08 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) From: Olivier To: "Thomas Mueller" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? In-Reply-To: <20190625005221.0D63061F84@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> (mueller6722@twc.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:34:08 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0DF396A6B8 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cs.ait.ac.th header.s=selector1 header.b=X3uXmDwm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=cs.ait.ac.th; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th designates 192.41.170.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.cs.ait.ac.th]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cs.ait.ac.th:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[16.170.41.192.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[cs.ait.ac.th,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[twc.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.02)[country: TH(0.09)]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4767, ipnet:192.41.170.0/24, country:TH]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cs.ait.ac.th:s=selector1]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(0.00)[cs.ait.ac.th.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.61)[-0.610,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RBL_COMPOSITE_RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED_DWL_DNSWL_MED(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:34:56 -0000 "Thomas Mueller" writes: >> mkdir -p /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap >> chown root:operator /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap >> chmod 775 /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap > > Where do you get /usr/.snap and /var/.snap ? > > I have seen /.snap in FreeBSD but never /usr/.snap or /var/.snap . That's in case /usr and /var are a different filesystem. There is a .snap directory at the root of each filesystem. Best regards, Olivier -- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 01:49:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0208615B414C; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [208.111.40.118]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A21C6AAD5; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (chombo [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:ae1f:6bff:fe6b:9e1c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "chombo.houseloki.net", Issuer "brtsvcs.net CA" (verified OK)) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99C8C38D0F; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:3c0b:f5d0:647:2a5] (unknown [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:3c0b:f5d0:647:2a5]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB2DB2F77; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:49:45 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Mel Pilgrim Subject: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:49:43 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8A21C6AAD5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 208.111.40.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[echo.brtsvcs.net,foxtrot.brtsvcs.net]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.68)[-0.679,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.79)[asn: 36236(-3.88), country: US(-0.06)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:208.111.40.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:49:56 -0000 I'm looking to set up a pure-IPv6 environment to test the viability of it. I tried this a few years ago and fell flat on my face due to the lack of NAT64 and DNS64 support. Reading through docs now, it looks like unbound has a DNS64 module, and NAT64 is baked into ipfw. Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations over the inertia of embedded systems designers, has it really become this easy to turn up an IPv6-only site? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 02:34:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C9A15B83FE; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579666C537; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id j6so187603ioa.5; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2oSDMbuiBkXav7dxnVr1He46FEGjYk87ewaYNdzkrMI=; b=HUaYBDbHHvRKS2lF/Fb1KwwGRhue4qytsZOhFO7gKpXIAXHsIgrW0M49eZ+LNEtgDT b4Y9rkHg8djvUIvWKFdt49mRat7aVGro8mVudSGPXlO2a5eL7mb16NqTUpHse/ZbwXRg AogHwWj4ET9QOTwISUdxvdfcnf/aEmkynnbVKf2FgAoAyEixuH6U+yBcOw+uiwvSMbXl f85mty9MZFTWWDQWNuXWIPdW8T+/XmQyIGw34ZPpuygF4Fy9l2+7+5lww1m1Mp5RH3A+ PhFOmlUPzRt1eVcxIyHQn6yRIHgCrvhfmcrLItCqnZB7nm5YdQw6hEHrzNHZbWK1L84Z 4N7w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2+zqA6RKtaB1/Z14cbMUEkAhNURJfhII0ejqxw+JIDoSED1Qa VDZa9c667gqfxpnZR6b6OYYZor4A X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzTrzhNA2GmCdLz42V8IvywjxwZvS4zUTGuQTfUxuvspnPW8zgYxEfAPOzi86z8cZPZqXck+w== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b987:: with SMTP id j129mr65203608iof.166.1561430050062; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com. [209.85.166.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm10763305iom.42.2019.06.24.19.34.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id e3so1666273ioc.12; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9749:: with SMTP id c9mr21187162ioo.258.1561430049296; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> From: Ultima Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:33:58 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? To: Mel Pilgrim Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 579666C537 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ultima1252@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ultima1252@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; IP_SCORE(-2.54)[ip: (-6.87), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.44), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ultimasbox.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.958,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[45.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ultima@ultimasbox.com,ultima1252@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ultima@ultimasbox.com,ultima1252@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:34:18 -0000 Hello Mel, While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard to drop IPv4 altogether and until something comes along forcing the move it likely won't happen for at least another decade at the minimum. Best regards, Richard Gallamore On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:50 PM Mel Pilgrim wrote: > I'm looking to set up a pure-IPv6 environment to test the viability of > it. I tried this a few years ago and fell flat on my face due to the > lack of NAT64 and DNS64 support. > > Reading through docs now, it looks like unbound has a DNS64 module, and > NAT64 is baked into ipfw. Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations > over the inertia of embedded systems designers, has it really become > this easy to turn up an IPv6-only site? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 02:35:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4000315B849F for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x742.google.com (mail-qk1-x742.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::742]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87426C5CD for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x742.google.com with SMTP id i125so11409136qkd.6 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y7PZNAjjTBOq3wGCv/hmI908zVKSE0o9e06JAZ9IdyY=; b=l9K5sr3+jXVgUu3HIsjYAttq+gAA3oGl/xR6jV1tSdwMQByDFAPA/mhMe3mRh8POGb ZQUH285rETSZKN4BmaC9xCce0kbPWp1IGrNaTGQHwvqj/yY85Kytnd84GVwkbrA1wAGP 8Idy6AnaJWASyaKilSV0yZe6cMkDI0sdBEEDduEpq+KuKktmG7qo1BSxYOUTzUAHyAAU BwUZF09cyFoQQ65SshF8BsQRO53edeo2dpOnMkU5p0ddUvhM5wS+g9mytLJmyNIm0IlV 14MqV1CxUh5ScvDtfb2cb0+A8rjghf2wp/NeFaV2B5u1bcmDzx2Cl2QFkowOnjuXeLGM p2wQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y7PZNAjjTBOq3wGCv/hmI908zVKSE0o9e06JAZ9IdyY=; b=aBJh2SV8ZEnWrtBSD271AycgmCIFf5oCdPW6dua3QOJc3QxDmfdcWk6Q/2xcbsX7++ yVzgOx1pJUngMNhrYS8XCAD0QXBKdn+SYGweJwTO1abuZA7VMsBvrqbyImRZjxknRS/p G24qyn+TJI2xbpO2C++eYyzikcjqu3GSP2j4ffH0UnIJVGjAvtm+cMi3DEpIX9df3JKX f6j+CAtMAGu/LOfKukxIlzekSIQFPBGKNpGWbedpJUUM8mhgg5Fis7cqpMjYrtGAvTDg DfxwIO2rx+Vj7yWW/8K8uKTnv7ZwQqTWIWcXWy9jiAz9rcLHtJXK8jCeOp4cPQSCuhKY wt8A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXacvL6O1j5DBrwLVivMu25ulJ8+WYG6I/DvPSrzVi+Uqj9ug1m uWKv+HtVzwxzAAH44X2PYU2m/+mJcgFwCIx6hhuEAc+Bmg0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwH1WwEiLu1QNh8H1uMfXb9Dbi6+z798GGZk3UeHtUaE7kQolfMeGY1loqt5Ly/ap+t52LH9Ay7u/DXGBePsNQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:6085:: with SMTP id u127mr113192177qkb.25.1561430125153; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2214.1561413756@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <5d11700c.1c69fb81.56ede.4e36SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5d11700c.1c69fb81.56ede.4e36SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> From: Michael Sierchio Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? To: Thomas Mueller Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D87426C5CD X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=l9K5sr3+ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.24 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.39)[-0.394,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.54)[ip: (2.82), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.14), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tenebras.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.4.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[twc.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:35:27 -0000 There will be one per filesystem, provided those filesystems support snapshots. If you see only /.snap, you have one big filesystem. That's okay for toy systems, or laptops, but you really want separate filesystems for /var, /tmp (which may be a tmpfs), and /usr. On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:51 PM Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Michael Sierchio: > > > It's just a directory. > > > mkdir -p /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap > > chown root:operator /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap > > chmod 775 /.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap > > Where do you get /usr/.snap and /var/.snap ? > > I have seen /.snap in FreeBSD but never /usr/.snap or /var/.snap . > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 "Well," Brahm=C4=81 said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is = no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mah=C4=81bh=C4=81rata From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 02:47:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810FC15B8B58; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D0C76CCDC; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (chombo [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:ae1f:6bff:fe6b:9e1c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "chombo.houseloki.net", Issuer "brtsvcs.net CA" (verified OK)) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91E9E38D0F; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:3c0b:f5d0:647:2a5] (unknown [IPv6:2601:1c2:1402:1770:3c0b:f5d0:647:2a5]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12FA42F88; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? To: Ultima Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:47:01 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9D0C76CCDC X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.63 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: echo.brtsvcs.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; IP_SCORE(-3.34)[ip: (-8.47), ipnet: 2607:f740:c::/48(-4.31), asn: 36236(-3.88), country: US(-0.06)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:47:07 -0000 On 2019-06-24 19:33, Ultima wrote: > Hello Mel, > > While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't > think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run > on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard > to drop IPv4 altogether and until something comes along forcing the > move it likely won't happen for at least another decade at the minimum. Yes, that is why I wrote "Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations over the inertia of embedded systems designers". This a lab experiment specifically to iron out the very wrinkles you just stated. > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:50 PM Mel Pilgrim > wrote: > >> I'm looking to set up a pure-IPv6 environment to test the viability of >> it. I tried this a few years ago and fell flat on my face due to the >> lack of NAT64 and DNS64 support. >> >> Reading through docs now, it looks like unbound has a DNS64 module, and >> NAT64 is baked into ipfw. Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations >> over the inertia of embedded systems designers, has it really become >> this easy to turn up an IPv6-only site? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 05:10:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2935F15BCAB8 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A7670A0D for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.12.43.126]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MUY9w-1i64Yv38M4-00QVbf; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:09:41 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:09:40 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Allen Schaaf Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I've got a major question... Message-Id: <20190625070940.d5170f2e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1z3CbXJaAknqr5zMFWQQhilLXHvVg/goLULuoNIZ3cdm82VT32G t94gjosTU/Q2qT1R4avDw5urGV+buMnuCam8WMP6yqKBUflZzzGx6N0ikPmv9ZzFtZTr3vz wRE513c4xxU42/1i/chmHhmDWk8qDf7ehNP4n07FL3mJubahiQt0zK4j5ElZ773KwfeCE8e Gez8TjhwmSb+/w6HWLBQQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:EclZSVMPyLo=:I5TbBWMJrQBB1v/u4NR1VX F90Bp4g4Up7Dbtbbb0+WvMSeDU5SC6ovyhrYcRIB3Z0/J6BgLeTw7IQYAZ+jLRyVrtww/OfLj 1hao7ppZthy55hbb3O4ntNqmFQ3jAhlXsFk8rr13Vqa/7vGzb0hqz82sK1svw8nX5adtj7kV/ mSgBXhCFPrM4pNiv6T0h2WD6GJEk+FyNsbp8/PTDK5GvzrI4a+5/MzMw8BrzreY3vvCZS1MQ4 i2SdFk4ErL7017UfJg4gfoW5AOENhleUEixZUwP3Gj+RsOmH8aa0dJC6ofmW4p+f0sZJg119p oJyQ791JleCxV0RNhdGI/OtR47HHTIngKfEPRQAsw764UYp1IMto84FvGZY06SsMKpzzbyeXm zsCtX7RXyZMSlaRj+ZLZy38w6M+ZKrPL695R8gEH5cUqDZJGfIglHWX6/Wdo5Ak6/5eDIjNLv WJRpvVrTXOG6rVP+O6x6UHcjp6jKqqK/Vylhysr/J6nEb81J09x3KQGjQuNHFDKe/lHNTzXp7 KdC2XleQMmfLMfwxymXrTOWS73hjfhJ7b/fkjvjkJIWkKLEmdtv5GZVm6Jko2SYkUgNN9nKvN 9dyOvfFPHJf6vOHRHitHfUiS7MivSBI+HYoKq3IWDQYcmF+RSvZHlqBTKPNhOcLZbuOVo3IV1 PFCLuw6xx/TTTAuwCR4ZULYA5vhLLwzfdAJuU1aPU6MWdJTfXMaDRxDYiyc4J1snStx5BJQoI F3zex18Zc3JFL1rZYlDIK4apxFmAEofSe01O5qDFfvDZCQp9894eWT1jjpM= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 75A7670A0D X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.93 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx01.schlund.de,mx00.schlund.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[126.43.12.178.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.76)[0.763,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.990,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[133.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.79)[ip: (2.87), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.40), asn: 8560(2.49), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:10:03 -0000 On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:32:02 -0700, Allen Schaaf wrote: > The issues are that we have to be able to connect to external > systems, corporate credit unions, ADP payroll, Mercury Mod > (record keeping) and our burglar alarm system as well as a couple > of other smaller systems. How do you connect to those? I assume the majority of services offer a web interface, so any web browser should be fine as long as the provider wasn't too stupid in implementing the servers (cf. messed up browser brand and version detection instead of reasonable feature detection). It might be possible that you will be required to run certain programs that are only available for current "Windows" versions. Test them with wine first. In some cases, this will work, if the program is not that obese or picky. ;-) > I'm not sure about how to go about > making sure that the system we will operate at our end will > connect to their end so I'm looking for some help and advice. My free advice is to test first. Build a test system with FreeBSD and make a checklist of all things that need to work. Test them, first with native solutions, and if those don't exist ("We do not support this 'Linux', we have no idea what it is.") try wine. In worst case, a virtualized environment for one specific application can also be helpful; data exchange can happen via virtual network. > Can you suggest people to connect to as well as a path forward? I'm sure there are providers of FreeBSD consulting services reading this list who will be able to offer you a good deal. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 05:17:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EA715BCF92 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7437270F4F for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.12.43.126]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MtPzy-1iaCvH1WcY-00urQP; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:12:33 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:12:32 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Michael Sierchio Cc: Thomas Mueller , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? Message-Id: <20190625071232.b01cecfc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <2214.1561413756@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <5d11700c.1c69fb81.56ede.4e36SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VjHMDoS+j7V1ELGsdYUUM2GdRDLGapPNpKUdcPC0DRy1BYWXuAD 8/BPufn+8P4+e3jyXCUB41TC3oeOL7IVZFEllshGOrhqJcrpt1nq2nikVO4w43ws/l0MTQS wwSbgnml1CCvh3JSttUVt1HuLtwgBUAHzLkMw8vn3BcG1VDrizjbURwSet9f/TBe2I4Q4az A0GWPVoYVOXmNl9MLCu4g== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qtbgZ3DutdQ=:Cq/yj2LEViG3obAxhoVnje 84TwF41h8ENx2wwoYm0dl0c2urNGVpVJXC69Ql1bSPBfplLCQEZcvAFZ6XOlb664cIThIcDmG DdLcSRjWKmqaiGN5F46ZWrol27NJultBbruEkaMUNgBQeKbOOir7TMzyAOIvPIilUEYhhCmuQ fha3WXxk12/NFDsu64CrTLEXe5VGgR9Rf7JnnHZRsubd5Uf5GJKZjSqn5P5L8Z+lOh0W4jmeV M5s0KzRpyIm4zm4lYtk0304fu078ZEGwOiGPlo2e59gvDivMOIhBezf/dOGr636EYY/6MyPTw K2hsVZDpVLJAA7ZOJpvEasVPaWCL10S5BwvWQqHZ0JhJUVLN6nBdWfKjidxDUKXdwoi4o3h3Z f/bIpBP415dw1/dQEK+ZJkG3eE57eGTFtEqduChBgcOQBFEyacTya7csQ/lEJLfVCwRVNnvJH 6Y9EbUpemPopABKxa2Vtz0rDVO4Y51QNwYcG79Fan5Kwb2JmLdduxP9jRJtI4EIE/gmeV0oz3 KeLjcLJVM315pPsIR1hLvIpyPHUJnb3+HUtazUputaW37WVSh52jnGXqda8fzUQ4GhTiy4aCX IdXJke6uK+0FcJCbiA9lrWxOB0TiwMdq7UZeCYTsdRBc1zy0i88UVUuHIp4pgWOrtU1s/Jr9S 3TyO6uFHNSeStoO+IOJwk8DU1LZ0O6cZ41e5lzTfxPqF4WEuY7LxspANUnaIo+r+l42Tliz3S mHv2/P5oMoQ8IqTOU9BVOApuJBk/tn7CIQ6BR/G2s+DwdVfRAQk7k6EQEzo= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7437270F4F X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.85 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(0.82)[ip: (3.03), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.40), asn: 8560(2.48), country: DE(-0.01)]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx01.schlund.de]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[126.43.12.178.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.65)[0.646,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.995,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[130.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[130.126.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[twc.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:17:56 -0000 On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:48 -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: > There will be one per filesystem, provided those filesystems support > snapshots. > > If you see only /.snap, you have one big filesystem. That's okay for toy > systems, or laptops, but you really want separate filesystems for /var, > /tmp (which may be a tmpfs), and /usr. Is this still the case? Don't get me wrong - I've always been a fan of functional partitioning, especially to stop misbehaving processes to mess up the whole system ("disk full, can't even write error log") as well as using features such as noexec on "untrusted user filesystems". With ZFS of course, this is all a lot easier, but with UFS, do people still use functional partitioning instead of "putting everything into one big / because that's how you do it today"? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 05:30:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0438C15C05FB for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC418714B9 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id E163361F83; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:29:54 +0700 (+07) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received:received :received; s=selector1; t=1561440594; x=1563254995; bh=yGC6o42Z/ kgWrspuY3hLmlaBmFydwAAXKkvVzMcVRXc=; b=ec8BGkUif7pua8kQBZZFuoKEF RKX8LwJycLN8LfUVSpgmJbSl2k3eWdy6n2VDKTo30FgWpDI97W/u4MBn18MPrn2C /vQ2S6T5OBmeh3/KgOmwm1K0F94iLMyK6lWkzpJLm9ZAqCNWiHB6z499mtUV9Ln6 9F1hGgrocixxifeTZM= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nf3RSv6bw1mu; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:29:54 +0700 (+07) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EDD061F82; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:29:54 +0700 (+07) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5P5TpS4025621; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:29:51 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) From: Olivier To: Polytropon Cc: kudzu@tenebras.com, mueller6722@twc.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? In-Reply-To: <20190625071232.b01cecfc.freebsd@edvax.de> (message from Polytropon on Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:12:32 +0200) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:29:50 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DC418714B9 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cs.ait.ac.th header.s=selector1 header.b=ec8BGkUi; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=cs.ait.ac.th; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th designates 192.41.170.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.65 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cs.ait.ac.th:s=selector1]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(0.00)[cs.ait.ac.th.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-2.97)[ip: (-7.88), ipnet: 192.41.170.0/24(-3.94), asn: 4767(-3.15), country: TH(0.09)]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[16.170.41.192.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.cs.ait.ac.th]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[cs.ait.ac.th,none]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cs.ait.ac.th:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4767, ipnet:192.41.170.0/24, country:TH]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_COMPOSITE_RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED_DWL_DNSWL_MED(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:30:04 -0000 Polytropon writes: > Is this still the case? > > Don't get me wrong - I've always been a fan of functional partitioning, > especially to stop misbehaving processes to mess up the whole system > ("disk full, can't even write error log") as well as using features > such as noexec on "untrusted user filesystems". With ZFS of course, > this is all a lot easier, but with UFS, do people still use functional > partitioning instead of "putting everything into one big / because > that's how you do it today"? It is the case for me, for all good reasons you mention above. Plus different backup policies on different file systems, plus moving one file system around without to have to move the whole machine... "putting everything into one big / because that's how you do it today" is what microsoft does, it does not mean it is the best solution. Olivier -- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 07:21:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9028815C2E45 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70BCD755C0 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.qeng-ho.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85CA10378; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:21:09 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? To: Polytropon , Michael Sierchio Cc: Thomas Mueller , FreeBSD Questions References: <2214.1561413756@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <5d11700c.1c69fb81.56ede.4e36SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <20190625071232.b01cecfc.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <5dd4f68d-d99a-4ab7-a217-76b9fee372e7@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:21:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190625071232.b01cecfc.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 70BCD755C0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@qeng-ho.org designates 217.155.128.241 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@qeng-ho.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.155.128.240/29]; IP_SCORE(-2.35)[ip: (-7.09), ipnet: 217.155.0.0/16(-3.54), asn: 13037(-1.01), country: GB(-0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[qeng-ho.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.mythic-beasts.com,mx2.mythic-beasts.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.946,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13037, ipnet:217.155.0.0/16, country:GB]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[twc.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:21:18 -0000 On 25/06/2019 06:12, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:34:48 -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: >> There will be one per filesystem, provided those filesystems support >> snapshots. >> >> If you see only /.snap, you have one big filesystem. That's okay for toy >> systems, or laptops, but you really want separate filesystems for /var, >> /tmp (which may be a tmpfs), and /usr. > > Is this still the case? > > Don't get me wrong - I've always been a fan of functional partitioning, > especially to stop misbehaving processes to mess up the whole system > ("disk full, can't even write error log") as well as using features > such as noexec on "untrusted user filesystems". With ZFS of course, > this is all a lot easier, but with UFS, do people still use functional > partitioning instead of "putting everything into one big / because > that's how you do it today"? I mostly use ZFS these days, but when using UFS I still use functional partitioning. This may just be inertia and habit on my part as I started using Unix back on the 6th Edition when disk sizes made it such partitioning necessary, but I tend to prefer /tmp and /var to be separate from /, even if /usr isn't. -- What do we want? A time machine! When do we want it? Errm ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 07:30:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796A915C3142 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@927589452.de) Received: from alioth.uberspace.de (alioth.uberspace.de [185.26.156.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99CD7589E for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@927589452.de) Received: (qmail 21165 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2019 07:23:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by alioth.uberspace.de with SMTP; 25 Jun 2019 07:23:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:19:43 +0200 From: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> X-Info: Keep It Simple, Stupid. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD, kernel 12.0-RELEASE X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! Microsoft sucks User-Agent: Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less. X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B99CD7589E X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.44 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.66)[ip: (-2.62), ipnet: 185.26.156.0/22(-0.39), asn: 58010(-0.31), country: DE(-0.01)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[927589452.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.22)[0.222,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RBL_VIRUSFREE_BOTNET(2.00)[45.156.26.185.bip.virusfree.cz : 127.0.0.2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[alioth.uberspace.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.29)[-0.289,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.97)[0.967,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de,mailinglists@927589452.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:58010, ipnet:185.26.156.0/22, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de,mailinglists@927589452.de]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:30:21 -0000 At the troopers con there was an v6 only network and most things already worked, The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is required by most systems. But i don't understand why you would use a NAT64, as one of the reasons to use IPv6 is not needing a NAT Greets J From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 07:38:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE3315C35C6 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8586A75EE1 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1561448324; x=1564040324; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=npKcrfjIay78NlrMz9kSBhUiG79h6Akn10WdxCSROPk=; b=VJA7dEU/OZlUgoeXH0kHPFaO03O6xkvNSyoPDkdKSf0vA98R5z0EzumNy5uj2boRoTguEVOD1r7CXVXibNwlNele1p/chik25dsx6hncdG63dKMzsgtIqQfxUk9jNDxXe8BUwc4sbWCqXqHu8CM5T6va53xJda9fw87Z5RSHiSk= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xYjUwMDAwMDA4YTc4NWYuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r5.us-east.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r5.us-east.aws.in.socketlabs.com [52.204.195.176]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:38:27 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r5.us-east.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:38:26 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1hfg25-000Dsc-4M for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:38:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:38:24 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-Id: <20190625083824.2c259fbd7ef91efcc3857e77@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8586A75EE1 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=VJA7dEU/; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.71 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mxbh.socketlabs.com,mxbsg.socketlabs.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.51)[-0.511,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; FORGED_SENDER_VERP_SRS(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.21)[ip: (-0.56), ipnet: 142.0.176.0/22(-0.26), asn: 7381(-0.19), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[198.176.0.142.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.15.0]; ENVFROM_VERP(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:38:45 -0000 On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:19:43 +0200 mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: > The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is > required by most systems. For lab work a /48 over a HE tunnel should do fine, only the router knows it's a tunnel :) -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 08:28:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD8715C47C8 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@927589452.de) Received: from alioth.uberspace.de (alioth.uberspace.de [185.26.156.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B695778EC for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@927589452.de) Received: (qmail 12942 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2019 08:28:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by alioth.uberspace.de with SMTP; 25 Jun 2019 08:28:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:27:15 +0200 From: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <20190625082715.lt27gdyimo3etpjz@deathbolt.927589452.space> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> <20190625083824.2c259fbd7ef91efcc3857e77@sohara.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190625083824.2c259fbd7ef91efcc3857e77@sohara.org> X-Info: Keep It Simple, Stupid. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD, kernel 12.0-RELEASE X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! Microsoft sucks User-Agent: Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less. X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8B695778EC X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.61)[ip: (-2.39), ipnet: 185.26.156.0/22(-0.37), asn: 58010(-0.29), country: DE(-0.01)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[927589452.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.36)[0.355,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RBL_VIRUSFREE_BOTNET(2.00)[45.156.26.185.bip.virusfree.cz : 127.0.0.2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alioth.uberspace.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.04)[-0.044,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.98)[0.978,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de,mailinglists@927589452.de]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:58010, ipnet:185.26.156.0/22, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de, mailinglists@927589452.de] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:28:49 -0000 On 19-06-25 08:38:24, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:19:43 +0200 > mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: > > > The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is > > required by most systems. > > > For lab work a /48 over a HE tunnel should do fine, only the router > knows it's a tunnel :) TBH: I just went live with it in my (home) network and gladly my provider announced a /48 per user From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 09:11:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DFA15C58AF for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gal.iecc.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E662D8114A for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 93272 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2019 09:11:25 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=16c56.5d11e53d.k1906; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=8a6InKtS63UIHY8dGKe/PfNEbi+XprhBozmiif/Fii0=; b=N0Po72O7sEqC/KHSGzUpVJjWLkiFQkBLmalI17nsXm09tmgTDolEliEkm0fEgD4aA6PjHfj0xmTsgzEdV51f4F4Nw5OEaAW8pCQ1j43c0DYv5GGyxcqv2YKzIX7f5P3wArssUmPal6PFI8MU3UMMfw/2gOZlAL5yaDLTCqO02ZCZ+uHSpeNejmO6sksWub/bql+8HfBBvYhj7ikL9UPJz/u6bAcA3vRwd/tAq7LXgzzxJefww/72dE+PDU6mBztS Received: from ary.local ([199.91.196.51]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 25 Jun 2019 09:11:25 -0000 Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D01A82016427DB; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:11:23 +0100 (+01) Date: 25 Jun 2019 10:11:23 +0100 Message-Id: <20190625091123.D01A82016427DB@ary.local> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd@qeng-ho.org Subject: Re: Can I recreate my .snap directories ? In-Reply-To: <5dd4f68d-d99a-4ab7-a217-76b9fee372e7@qeng-ho.org> Organization: Taughannock Networks X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:11:28 -0000 In article <5dd4f68d-d99a-4ab7-a217-76b9fee372e7@qeng-ho.org>, Arthur Chance wrote: >> such as noexec on "untrusted user filesystems". With ZFS of course, >> this is all a lot easier, but with UFS, do people still use functional >> partitioning instead of "putting everything into one big / because >> that's how you do it today"? If you're worried about limiting disk usage in different file trees, you really should be using ZFS rather than fixed UFS partitions so you get finer control and can still use the whole disk. On small systems where I use UFS, /tmp is mfs and everything else is in one shared partition. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 09:13:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5088715C5B24 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwan@rail.eu.org) Received: from mail.rail.eu.org (mail.rail.eu.org [IPv6:2001:bc8:30d3:ff17::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEE781515 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwan@rail.eu.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:bc8:30d3:ffff::1000] (bibi-vpn.rail.eu.org [IPv6:2001:bc8:30d3:ffff::1000]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: erwan) by mail.rail.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5D2FE022 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:13:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=rail.eu.org; s=mail; t=1561453988; bh=KOseWDqq6XMKGrtAlz95YR4IhCnFMSVo4NeWF7+0Qpk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=R1PrSWH7W7TfvAb0GOKhr5o84MR1J9+IcqdPTaqfI10ujiaPXwmpNpxeYfRWdO6x7 vViJYVAn24lioY6wDzb7ucNubhqSYOYtxXDVuhZGY9pMVJZqQRzm11qKAOHkF6WV/6 O83p3OmFabbPHOqvVWhr0eqgWGOF/yfnGf223SjQ= Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> <20190625083824.2c259fbd7ef91efcc3857e77@sohara.org> <20190625082715.lt27gdyimo3etpjz@deathbolt.927589452.space> From: Erwan David Openpgp: id=CAB1220E04DDF6E9CF0CD5C9B80EAC15E40FFD0F Autocrypt: addr=erwan@rail.eu.org; keydata= mQINBFJAaOMBEADAHsjODUMNImClvj0eAW7oCKr/cjccRts2DVrslhb6UEDbxgvnCKGtRy2P A9NcILX/+lG9zaoPw0caDSXDuubrC/giKZAphUTSmd+Uqz+9WDtU602WQuP5d5S1aAUe+fzT 6l9iDSR8Fz07ajjZ791Q0P1P4EwWQDbCJvmNXAknwysX0fIAlLpDaIQ0Asa6IvG/v8TyLZSE U0NytwIfHJMJk5btrM4fdaGc+4XnTK0E2Oa+Qjab18fsBLtHGctQUrDjrWvnGj1slHrfhUrT 67e9NHZgDPmEsOeCChd1ZWurIR0AQFp/Wrz80abJltk+aFswEzOvhkriOGjt4gM31BocpNbZ +sEEg9M6skAeXvuISkfS0bCM3kZ6MgywHE98AbA+8WxiKMRKuuuTNSEmIIRQt8dn7ad/1+r1 KAZ1bkB2naCDArqnpeDb65+378qh/2J6/M0UivSMFLzxXc+AyIxucjmrK8VCWQbDwUiA6sPU W4BC7V7+5j7ELzh4JzQX2LisNzPOqkaTVTfmCgDeL7V9LZErtLlG1rYbISrLvDnWNdiJ9l1d flxnhCs4oqn8KA5DtV6HNwIW6b6zwEHFoDPwtK2fctj0VIRwjiIMlyrEWHiC5NZoPyfexGlj RNP7oaDb6PIItgnBItWq/ZRymXP9gA945DjnrozsUZ02y7OMjQARAQABtB9FcndhbiBEYXZp ZCA8ZXJ3YW5AcmFpbC5ldS5vcmc+iQJUBBMBCAA+AhsDBQsJCAcDBRUKCQgLBRYDAgEAAh4B AheAFiEEyrEiDgTd9unPDNXJuA6sFeQP/Q8FAlzBWT8FCRPm8dwACgkQuA6sFeQP/Q+Ikw/+ Img88okG/yRMOXScYx2/xzr85kpoWJ2k6Pl5w23zZ3oHflMGqXfp5mVQbq2X7MRx/CJwvBcK BAOPe2xVPLh26AlCOI+ZY/cM7HtnKPhIGRqTVi6K8wRE2HSpusVTP9sIt3V7oudYawJq/3KG zRsLXQb4FzvZxE+WXEB1NOHYZsH9A/gG1ljsTAux0Gh6RFp+Ij904YzFyh2gSRTpcSmyotXA X+ur/Cp4fPxCgIKP5evT0Nnq+LUwUoYjhHh73VubdmhouXa4EHQnBtGpuAyRDYnu0GPO2Oo6 Zudsin1MKbYdfwwKo2be7XQa2L1Xx3eavwseJqAAYucKxEQtiqenRWV40Av18Jkv17g0ao3L 0vtoKViljOJgL1Ny8436b6oLJzyNOby0OWHbRjp1l/RYfVYXW2wlF5XzLUMBclZX1fSjheoK vCewHoiRl9XPA+Y4RXMfHRRRFqTt3rkt8A7FBnVXePqwCl63FJ7Ywap60UIsUkXqI2fv5COH eduWKzLvwK22KaaleDadxDgRT7uJSS1XVIjUhkNgrqVMhfoo3yS6qi4+7baGVSrjYRLOp8IO bBtxuNPaQw+/R6BsLC0qacCV0FFY7k22aaKl1WoMNkzY38hyxOPp2VHLtwIGGhY8hHicQUsu KTkF0e24LM5x0Qd7/YyckRDN3FxM6wEYANu5Ag0EUkBo4wEQAL6D44lG/kjEQCY17c5qoeIK RMgR2ZUC6Mx2wPjhawaxRoiDE6EYEt7A5S1KEx+VXDClRnj0DrnCC5UqWsKq0443p3SploIq oCU9yaUe5sfutwCb3SWl2Ae9sAb09RIgdS41Hhg1U1TctIPjLy+0A9qtTopqPZi3ffE+RcJG RDJbJO9e8FiGIkGayruqmvFGJ7lOyK806FJJduDdLbK/l9G3tvxglvrAoPfjxPMPqUACk4t+ 5Gaiu56Kdzf+Fh6hk5UJSV5ETj5FLes+eQgwqa0cPbVsbxZ93Q3ZXBCRTJVP7V34cGjGEeqR ikmceoLJ3Z0erpPY6xn8uHP0AWTh+8g5IlGnt+nfwqPvQcCOBpQGEWIX5Olb52w9J6/TrowV u0aK4XjMuEKRt+ggHwmE6oGGwMppMsEOZXkMOMOJt5hStJ2XcNljH5lWFKL+JyuPJVjOZTt/ wbOk2xtUANAZdsGhQcrkkUx961PVAz4fo+8LDX4eRVLvuFUTJgRaMzlh6EQkgCzprYrZUHa2 5/+GTMygk6kG1cEn10gENAT4g9Gmq6FCExQERg5fZDwC5sxNVPqBa54zyXGGJ+4gReJglFsj xHPKgTaebVTMkwYhVR8UeAMb/yBzpsTD5dr0+Fc7VnmBs5rjqR8bnnx0agJ0HkIB9efAw5tl gwNbVUo5OaUvABEBAAGJAh8EGAEIAAkFAlJAaOMCGwwACgkQuA6sFeQP/Q8A7g//RF2nU4xm n9jlmP1YhiJ6Kx72ODpDVONAujNJ3i71RcGS84pTwedHm8VaOI9hH1eSIxM4AM+hFmruTw65 PR0aziUjMZRsZ112GgiC6UyzfAUIQ1ypjty6rpE1P8C2G2WNNuEwAnr6OiTZA4kim9YmF1FQ y61dbAbajJaFA/SABMu8WJW/YXVYtxHgGW7KLj9LHfnWmbkDz1ECBJsh76PeHavsqhRTHfp7 JWFmsVsxViJT4sr+HkiDfTDuT4k1Ba8Kj3yscsntyNH1l8G/YbDdsfHEhDmsYCLrGb/fUm+p C4DT4+ygLSCJkI1/elKiUpOmOuMgu5xieWhXaWKQa73zsdShhuyRa74MPA8WjkLyDRlb8cGv J5cwsjwnidHE2gYqZETGSGuZDoTPUb5kc2XEKwg1eLuL67acYllzp2epAOAbXn2RahZJPUNX D9MKacByetKBAusXNi4AszxcBqFEHpG4/t3stLmXIDd5LvUayovHd1steHbEPvl9dpU36Fte cnUNO6Z9JhIvAYy8b/7TT61qwQvOsca+NMlS/q+hPkx3npI1GFEAkanFLrLVE1MGT6C0kZ2M Em7mCpZQIZT2IhMsHXhaMQlP5np5/mFJ915bd+B3usfoQNWJmN3g7tVZGvl5Z7m7J5Zv3L84 U13tbPt33blV8WK4hIDA/c/rm2k= Message-ID: <162c9c97-db6c-73fe-b503-5373122f08a2@rail.eu.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:13:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190625082715.lt27gdyimo3etpjz@deathbolt.927589452.space> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:13:18 -0000 Le 25/06/2019 à 10:27, mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de a écrit : > On 19-06-25 08:38:24, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:19:43 +0200 >> mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: >> >>> The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is >>> required by most systems. >> >> For lab work a /48 over a HE tunnel should do fine, only the router >> knows it's a tunnel :) > TBH: I just went live with it in my (home) network and gladly my > provider announced a /48 per user > _______________________________________________ My home provider provides a /56. But the box it provides as home gateway, without which there is no support and which is very difficult to replace by a real router is unable to handle more than a /64 on the LAN side... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 10:17:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419D615C7619 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE36083E1E for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.qeng-ho.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFD310378; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:17:30 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? To: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <93a8bcd3-df22-7f9b-ef42-2791987eb7c7@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:17:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EE36083E1E X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@qeng-ho.org designates 217.155.128.241 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@qeng-ho.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.155.128.240/29]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[qeng-ho.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.mythic-beasts.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.915,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13037, ipnet:217.155.0.0/16, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.27)[ip: (-6.86), ipnet: 217.155.0.0/16(-3.43), asn: 13037(-1.00), country: GB(-0.09)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:17:35 -0000 On 25/06/2019 08:19, mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: > At the troopers con there was an v6 only network and most things already > worked, > The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is > required by most systems. Really? My ISP (Zen in the UK) gives you a /48 as standard (plus a /64 just for the link to them), and everything I've seen about IPv6 suggests /48 or /56 assignments are the norms. > But i don't understand why you would use a NAT64, as one of the reasons > to use IPv6 is not needing a NAT It's so nice to have servers with the same address in house as well as externally. -- What do we want? A time machine! When do we want it? Errm ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 10:21:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C6015C798D; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org) Received: from saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org (saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org [217.29.35.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFA78405D; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org) Received: from juno.lyxys.ka.sub.org (juno.lyx [IPv6:fd2a:89ca:7d54:0:240:caff:fe92:4f47]) by saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5PABeuQ060577 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:11:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org) Received: from juno.lyxys.ka.sub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by juno.lyxys.ka.sub.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5PABeZ9026808 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:11:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org) Received: (from wolfgang@localhost) by juno.lyxys.ka.sub.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5PABeGb026805; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:11:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: juno.lyx: wolfgang set sender to wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org using -f Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:11:40 +0200 From: Wolfgang Zenker To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <20190625101140.GG26071@lyxys.ka.sub.org> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> Organization: private site User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org [IPv6:fd2a:89ca:7d54:1:200:24ff:feca:b4cc]); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:11:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8AFA78405D X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org designates 217.29.35.151 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.75 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.977,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sub.org]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[subnet.sub.net,mailin.pluspunkthosting.de,saturn.lyxys.ka.sub.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.28)[-0.277,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.19)[ipnet: 217.29.32.0/20(-0.53), asn: 16188(-0.42), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:21:23 -0000 * Mel Pilgrim [190625 04:47]: > On 2019-06-24 19:33, Ultima wrote: >> While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't >> think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run >> on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard >> to drop IPv4 altogether and until something comes along forcing the >> move it likely won't happen for at least another decade at the minimum. > Yes, that is why I wrote "Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations > over the inertia of embedded systems designers". > This a lab experiment specifically to iron out the very wrinkles you > just stated. Depending on what you want to do it is viable now. At work we use IPv6-only jails for web hosting, where all jails on one physical machine share one NAT64 gateway for outgoing connects to IPv4-only services like Github. That gateway is the only dual-stack jail on a machine, the host and all other jails are IPv6 only. The NAT64 jail also provides a reverse proxy for incoming web access on IPv4. Customers on an IPv4-only connection use a ssh jumphost to access the server. We use ipfw for NAT64 and bind for DNS64. At RIPE meetings twice a year I use the provided IPv6-only network for net access with phone and notebook; in these 10 days per year for the last couple of years I have not seen any problems myself. Some people reported problems accessing VPN gateways though, and accessing IPv4-only services that use DNSSEC is a problem if your local resolver on the client does DNSSEC validation. >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:50 PM Mel Pilgrim >> wrote: >>> I'm looking to set up a pure-IPv6 environment to test the viability of >>> it. I tried this a few years ago and fell flat on my face due to the >>> lack of NAT64 and DNS64 support. >>> Reading through docs now, it looks like unbound has a DNS64 module, and >>> NAT64 is baked into ipfw. Waving a hand at bug-hunting and lamentations >>> over the inertia of embedded systems designers, has it really become >>> this easy to turn up an IPv6-only site? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 10:31:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382D115C7E4B for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A9084735 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:31:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id q26so12278298lfc.3 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:31:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZCh4H0wEriCJm/ksN7OwkbAf1ugEeUd6zr2v6pM4zMk=; b=V875HhGMI+PAwNavUfhVaDy42c8S7PBOn9tlcdIeT0WdE5I2wbLlJOt3vJuRkTxLcY 9EF+M2RR7G+16bvLUH9mhHazs4aR2x5mlO0wFHTRSyPFjua32MYCp1L9y3PuFWfrN0Rp aULvgEpTk3UDeBPWU87uy2YWvOTx7qFjSbbhqUq5QjkarH46/lCk3bOuq+OBHszwozNU vMRugZdN1RsfzKji7SQA+5oIvKlVF/JTjLloyd4PObJCcPE7uPA2v+12u4seKht78T1F 9LuCfN40HbFu2K+sqZv9jNaq0qxlnElBdbMsakEdvYVMvv0pKfv0BcGQulKKZZTgDUGd jyiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZCh4H0wEriCJm/ksN7OwkbAf1ugEeUd6zr2v6pM4zMk=; b=WZolWJ2mHoHeYBdEeIHUEIVCddWVPBzV3mI1FbEXusR6QzYGHorHSZbdpYIPA1kdai w/OKocEdlXT58B0b0487XXaks+W8H6MxfGo1QzG/hA4N9hUzryvcfBSLytghHXpr3AIR yKLofAFoMd9OLDKw+iLwTwUdKbQ0D/tJzPYLa6JmtFJlg6Db8WWAepNAPfVO94bety/v IAfzSIxPnZ2wInzpdmddcE4p5WW5NiRgKwEbpC3TPkesuWsN/RAAzFxNgGWS/b90cNKL r7cTxjb57N/71dPeomkMeN5teLrp3X/eVPXReVK4iif31DsAHw1tW9YoYbSjWL3MQvLt ixeg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUzNTe+EIYy+q+x0pU4lpAJQsCSEfA3rPZUhsCwczSDeMKXSdb0 IvEsmu847pjjxig23om+aNDPMuEqdBbARn+s5NN6AEAS X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyX9BuNSHrARhDaQxDB+gdNbrc6Ey+ua2FG+X6/OPZqqCeGIe9kM+YgI7q9FmrAO4J0oRpcx/9uJzBTtzOcL2E= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4152:: with SMTP id c18mr28682243lfi.144.1561458700357; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:31:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200908071142.n77BgWKF034276@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:31:01 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cleaning emailUSB WiFi adapter for FreeBSD 10.3 To: Olivier Cc: User Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 06A9084735 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=V875HhGM; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of odhiambo@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=odhiambo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.948,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMA