From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Wed May 20 07:45:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5EC2C9847 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 07:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49RlD65k2vz3Zd8 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 07:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from venus.yoonka.com ([10.70.7.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 04K7jeWA039178 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 07:45:40 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) X-Authentication-Warning: msa1.earth.yoonka.com: Host [10.70.7.24] claimed to be venus.yoonka.com To: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org From: Grzegorz Junka Subject: The new graphics ports and pkg-base Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 07:45:40 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49RlD65k2vz3Zd8 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list1@gjunka.com designates 88.98.225.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list1@gjunka.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.68 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.98.225.149]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.43)[0.430]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.55)[0.551]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gjunka.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56478, ipnet:88.98.192.0/18, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 07:45:43 -0000 I am trying to understand the impact of distributing ports with sources on building and packaging base with pkg. If I understand correctly, some ports, when installed with pkg, extract sources, which then supposed to be compiled with the kernel. For instance, drm-current-kmod extracts lots of files into /usr/local/sys/modules/ Would that mean those ports have to be installed on the host that is used to build the kernel and world, which are then packaged with 'make packages' into pkg-base? GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Wed May 20 16:30:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049EC2DE1A3 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [174.136.98.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.nomadlogic.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Ryt33qMvz4QQc for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from MacBook-Pro.nomadlogic.org (cpe-23-243-161-111.socal.res.rr.com [23.243.161.111]) by mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 829e40d6 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 20 May 2020 16:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: The new graphics ports and pkg-base To: Grzegorz Junka , freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org References: From: Pete Wright Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:30:44 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Ryt33qMvz4QQc X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pete@nomadlogic.org designates 174.136.98.114 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pete@nomadlogic.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.14 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.81)[-0.811]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nomadlogic.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.538]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.486]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25795, ipnet:174.136.96.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[23.243.161.111:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:30:53 -0000 On 5/20/20 12:45 AM, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > I am trying to understand the impact of distributing ports with > sources on building and packaging base with pkg. > > If I understand correctly, some ports, when installed with pkg, > extract sources, which then supposed to be compiled with the kernel. > > For instance, drm-current-kmod extracts lots of files into > /usr/local/sys/modules/ hrm I am not seeing that behavior on my end: $ pkg list drm-devel-kmod /boot/modules/amdgpu.ko /boot/modules/drm.ko /boot/modules/i915kms.ko /boot/modules/linuxkpi_gplv2.ko /boot/modules/radeonkms.ko /boot/modules/ttm.ko /boot/modules/vboxvideo.ko /boot/modules/vmwgfx.ko /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/BSD2CLAUSE /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/GPLv2 /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/LICENSE /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/MIT /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/catalog.mk $ maybe i'm missing something though and this behavior only happens on systems using pkg-base?  i believe there was some discussion about bundling the required source to build drm-kmod locally in a similar fashion as linux dkms, but i'm not sure if that's progressed. cheers, -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Wed May 20 22:45:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3582F7437 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 22:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49S79l6K2qz3gGW for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 22:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from [10.70.7.24] ([10.70.7.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 04KMiwRC048071 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 May 2020 22:44:58 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: The new graphics ports and pkg-base To: Pete Wright , freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org References: From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 23:44:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49S79l6K2qz3gGW X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list1@gjunka.com designates 88.98.225.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list1@gjunka.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.68 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.98.225.149:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.83)[-0.825]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gjunka.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.922]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.631]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56478, ipnet:88.98.192.0/18, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 22:45:00 -0000 On 20/05/2020 17:30, Pete Wright wrote: > > > On 5/20/20 12:45 AM, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> I am trying to understand the impact of distributing ports with >> sources on building and packaging base with pkg. >> >> If I understand correctly, some ports, when installed with pkg, >> extract sources, which then supposed to be compiled with the kernel. >> >> For instance, drm-current-kmod extracts lots of files into >> /usr/local/sys/modules/ > > hrm I am not seeing that behavior on my end: > $ pkg list drm-devel-kmod > /boot/modules/amdgpu.ko > /boot/modules/drm.ko > /boot/modules/i915kms.ko > /boot/modules/linuxkpi_gplv2.ko > /boot/modules/radeonkms.ko > /boot/modules/ttm.ko > /boot/modules/vboxvideo.ko > /boot/modules/vmwgfx.ko > /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/BSD2CLAUSE > /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/GPLv2 > /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/LICENSE > /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/MIT > /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/catalog.mk > $ > > maybe i'm missing something though and this behavior only happens on > systems using pkg-base?  i believe there was some discussion about > bundling the required source to build drm-kmod locally in a similar > fashion as linux dkms, but i'm not sure if that's progressed. Have a look at this commit (comments and the pkg-plist): https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20990 Also here https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/graphics/drm-current-kmod/pkg-plist There is also the following comment in an email titled "drm drivers project report (week of May 4th)" which "Emmanuel Vadot" posted to freebsd-current and freebsd-x11: > As the drm-kmod ports install the sources in the system a kernel > compilation will rebuild those modules and install them in /boot/kernel > whereas using https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/ will install > everything in /boot/modules I am not sure about drm-devel-kmod but I can confirm that a binary drm-current-kmod does contain sources and installs them when the port is installed. You can see those files in the commit I posted above. GrzegorzJ From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Wed May 20 23:46:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0462F8305 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 23:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [174.136.98.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.nomadlogic.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49S8XY6ZYlz40gY for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 23:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from [192.168.1.159] (cpe-23-243-161-111.socal.res.rr.com [23.243.161.111]) by mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id eac5b61c (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 20 May 2020 23:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: The new graphics ports and pkg-base To: Grzegorz Junka , freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org References: From: Pete Wright Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:46:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49S8XY6ZYlz40gY X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pete@nomadlogic.org designates 174.136.98.114 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pete@nomadlogic.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.61 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.82)[-0.816]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nomadlogic.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.78)[-0.777]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.712]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25795, ipnet:174.136.96.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[23.243.161.111:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 23:46:23 -0000 On 5/20/20 3:44 PM, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 20/05/2020 17:30, Pete Wright wrote: >> >> >> On 5/20/20 12:45 AM, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>> I am trying to understand the impact of distributing ports with >>> sources on building and packaging base with pkg. >>> >>> If I understand correctly, some ports, when installed with pkg, >>> extract sources, which then supposed to be compiled with the kernel. >>> >>> For instance, drm-current-kmod extracts lots of files into >>> /usr/local/sys/modules/ >> >> hrm I am not seeing that behavior on my end: >> $ pkg list drm-devel-kmod >> /boot/modules/amdgpu.ko >> /boot/modules/drm.ko >> /boot/modules/i915kms.ko >> /boot/modules/linuxkpi_gplv2.ko >> /boot/modules/radeonkms.ko >> /boot/modules/ttm.ko >> /boot/modules/vboxvideo.ko >> /boot/modules/vmwgfx.ko >> /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/BSD2CLAUSE >> /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/GPLv2 >> /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/LICENSE >> /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/MIT >> /usr/local/share/licenses/drm-devel-kmod-5.2.g20200515/catalog.mk >> $ >> >> maybe i'm missing something though and this behavior only happens on >> systems using pkg-base?  i believe there was some discussion about >> bundling the required source to build drm-kmod locally in a similar >> fashion as linux dkms, but i'm not sure if that's progressed. > > > Have a look at this commit (comments and the pkg-plist): > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20990 > > Also here > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/graphics/drm-current-kmod/pkg-plist > > There is also the following comment in an email titled "drm drivers > project report (week of May 4th)" which "Emmanuel Vadot" posted to > freebsd-current and freebsd-x11: > > > As the drm-kmod ports install the sources in the system a kernel > > compilation will rebuild those modules and install them in /boot/kernel > > whereas using https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/ will install > > everything in /boot/modules > > I am not sure about drm-devel-kmod but I can confirm that a binary > drm-current-kmod does contain sources and installs them when the port > is installed. You can see those files in the commit I posted above. > i am sorry, i had misread which version of the kmod you were referring to.  i am not sure why this is not implemented on the drm-devel-kmod port.  for this specific port it may be worth pinging the freebsd-x11@ mailing list as they would be able to provide more insight into this change. -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Thu May 21 19:04:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8EF2F14E8 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 19:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49SfDR5bJDz48jH for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 19:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from venus.yoonka.com ([10.70.7.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 04LJ45XM063781 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 21 May 2020 19:04:05 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) X-Authentication-Warning: msa1.earth.yoonka.com: Host [10.70.7.24] claimed to be venus.yoonka.com Subject: Re: The new graphics ports and pkg-base To: Pete Wright , freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org References: From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 19:04:03 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49SfDR5bJDz48jH X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list1@gjunka.com designates 88.98.225.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list1@gjunka.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.87 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.98.225.149]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.851]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gjunka.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.27)[0.273]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56478, ipnet:88.98.192.0/18, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 19:04:09 -0000 On 20/05/2020 23:46, Pete Wright wrote: > >> >> I am not sure about drm-devel-kmod but I can confirm that a binary >> drm-current-kmod does contain sources and installs them when the port >> is installed. You can see those files in the commit I posted above. >> > > i am sorry, i had misread which version of the kmod you were referring > to.  i am not sure why this is not implemented on the drm-devel-kmod > port.  for this specific port it may be worth pinging the freebsd-x11@ > mailing list as they would be able to provide more insight into this > change. > I kind of understand the change, I was asking more how this affect pkg-base. I did try to compile 13-current kernel and world and package it with pkg-base to install on another comp but I failed and I think it was due to this issue - that the kernel/world didn't include the sources from the drm-current-kmod package. Does anyone in pkg-base know if it's just for drm-current-kmod or if it will be used in other kmod ports as well? Because if it is, then the whole pkg-base idea is going to be affected? GrzegorzJ