From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 01:15:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FD6232C71 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 01:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com (mail-ot1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489Ch52j25z4JP1 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 01:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id a15so10354483otf.1 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 17:15:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8aOxHF2IRKTXAFZ/18R/vuEue254So65i5M/k8BUmtk=; b=YQGBk9OZVCqCh5107vHpbAFuYj0lEsfmgyJOf0IEj+w6LEIHcvZ+8VXHFERzGv3Kx1 0JDum+1zxKkPSNSFphklL8XUM+N7g2TqDE3kW1m+mDHUa+dyNI/esi1sdyRCPI6Xn5i1 RNZvrqj5s0l7piGCoCKwn2+Cz6GzWTQXHKxlV+HpulHO/AZ1L6iTRUGkAjef71t/vroA SOHbYZTiYeOh7HT4K83hDX1SA3otGPWiBLlhOGaFoESFxonyZ1b8lWP4XkMTFclbT7Qo Qy3UA5HTYTq0ECmSaqeXvEsaNGRkxLRzjnbXZOOGdP+15/4je03gro9UFQVPXyPaHGat iTYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8aOxHF2IRKTXAFZ/18R/vuEue254So65i5M/k8BUmtk=; b=ovdsS78wimB06JftZNjiPz6LD3DiIdz9l28kVY+UP+OVtQvCYvTcBo/DWAyvnoe91a MjHb2rPRYhaATTuvTEx09WTfqfVPdR2WBEX0izgbjSVINzrrptkY0TE5iMtwZwT0hC9z /4+x+GzxhdVtPLE4DXq6P5efQBuOo6c8cGNFTkF8870FBJ4yzUKIKDecCLs+S1TI6BZp CXmV1uEvyVMON2T3dGUZ5vvF3w8fuq59eLOCSCLTUizDINcv672sPyg/osOGhs2zyLFv VAjR/uyCwRQOfRcYjZ91/pQD6d3kc/GftyOu3QgAaMxDuEW8MFLux8TGX36ouJqVjkss qn0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV3HhAtNrBZ1v3mFYKOTofbs2YJ87JT4KnDmMlo/hjd3YR4BjSU SGouomNad8FcYtAeleoHUY6Ct3Vb5mHi4J+FXRg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzl7Il9enfAL5s2VVfBX7u7Ou3lbG2ZnPgywWXQ+YZV3twyDN1TJLd+WZFixcpRsTqg15y2tcT/qPJHMbYwcWo= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:774e:: with SMTP id t14mr12661994otl.358.1580606147909; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 17:15:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2365de86-89a7-eba7-cf43-384990019353@gmail.com> <987f41fc-65e9-ebd6-4b8e-390b6837ecc0@FreeBSD.org> <20200131114201.717290fb@dismail.de> <20200131174723.528480a5@dismail.de> <0bb675ff-8324-3fa6-f6f6-379fda3fe406@FreeBSD.org> <20200131184939.57d4c048@dismail.de> <20200201064408.04a44f69@dismail.de> <20200201163941.137f9122@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20200201163941.137f9122@dismail.de> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 17:15:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: openblas-0.3.7_1,1 error install To: ajtiM Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489Ch52j25z4JP1 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YQGBk9OZ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::335 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[7]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-7.26), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.00), asn: 15169(-1.76), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[5.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 01:15:50 -0000 I can't say anything about the missing library issue as I have not seen it. It is true that cblas and openblas now conflict. That is because openblas added cblas emulation that duplicates the libraries cblas installed. It is important that openblas be re-installed after cblas is deleted as it probably will delete files that openblas installs. I deleted both cblas and openblas (pkg delete -f cblas openblas) and then installed openblas. When I tried installing py-numpy@py27, it still failed, still trying to link to cblas stuff. Something was cached somewhere. I tried a couple of days later, after a reboot, and it built perfectly. I don't know if it was the reboot or something else, but everything builds and works fine, now. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 1:39 PM ajtiM wrote: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 12:20:10 -0800 > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > That is a configuration option, but the default is to use openblas. > > The change was made a few months ago. > > > > If you have built py-numpy from ports in the past, use "make -C > > /usr/ports/math/py-numpy" to change the saved config to use > > math/openblas. (NETLIB was the previous default which used cblas.) > > -- > > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 3:44 AM ajtiM via freebsd-ports < > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:49:39 -0500 > > > ajtiM wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:29:10 -0500 > > > > Steve Wills wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > On 1/31/20 5:47 PM, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ls -al /usr/local/lib/libopenblas* > > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 32273330 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 > > > > > > root wheel 15492200 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.so lrwxr-xr-x 1 > > > > > > root wheel 29 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.a -> libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.a > > > > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 30 Jan 31 10:45 > > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libopenblas.so -> > > > > > > libopenblas_nehalemp-r0.3.7.so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you seeing any other issues besides the complaint from > > > > > portmaster? > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > For now I do not have problem but also pkg check -d -n -a shows: > > > > > > > > Checking all packages: 100% > > > > py27-numpy is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > > py37-numpy is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > > py37-scipy is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > > suitesparse is missing a required shared library: libopenblas.so > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > Does py-numpy depends on math/cblas still? > > > Thank you. > > > > > Yes, I had default option NETLIB and cblas was installed but I have > installed also openblas at the same time, I do not have clbla installed. > Now, I cannot have both at the same time and I do not know why py-numpy > is missing shared libraries which are installed. > -- > =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D. > > Napoleon Bonaparte > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 06:09:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240ED23A46B for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com (mail-ot1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489LCK6XHVz4XtL for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 06:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id r16so10657668otd.2 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 22:09:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UDsM5Zlj/HpXsF293VeOrbxdT7efNbCq9mNFIZbUY/s=; b=mDmo5avBfqjaOBk2NR3SdCNojWBEZ+3LGR2umT7yzPge3SBZJ7aolS4JYADEDvehWt qQP/pnmqdVut3f70DPenTJ3jONlg4xRLkE9qyjFqhGdFM+EoXwOG5IPSSGjGOy389H70 YLijRkkUoU8QQ3qTzCQYWegY8zKTGVYN6J2BC/1q6zpcbF2jJdeY7qobmracOLF5HtMB oIOgXteCYf4Bg1KMx5NrGCI+VB7jsQlP2wIxVIjIKMgUi1cHWRzEuklFEEAgzmL9H8Aw hxPgRx439OOiao3ReEtXs+4hIAFZ9DWQJG73cRqRAEBkaV8PoOHGVLiwiwtPtoma2DeG +vgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UDsM5Zlj/HpXsF293VeOrbxdT7efNbCq9mNFIZbUY/s=; b=CzAJzf1VCCjElXrVxUV5wyM0aBcZyvyMbtxvOf8FDFTTMNmLhc/5r0F5gNiBSn7zEy 9NZ12YnDRL8Woxxpzu49tdYok7daEwIKaKnyIbaLgwYyqPkmhd/U15P3FwX2BTktX2MR 29DSppzSbrTIifwnFVWua0NRVngmvZD9b9j1ctzLLIj2bYrgkcXALnIaqHe9mndfRhlc bOWD2blUO/ok4Fq+byQTdE2CBuMVmZs3lnsJYaVDBYXpgLTneLU35WLzidep6itOgxWe 9jL1o5Ey5UnXFzqXB4MNBt0+w/aMfL197S6zo+fWpq3sgNGpvecxGOFkrmPGDeYm+C36 F9LQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWcGDZDCKF9K4E93SxPHwoNdeGAHtmuDOi3gEjQq74d1SEtxMev jS2HjcU2tEujDtyA+kAaSyAcPTTpyg8ubyO1Gr6V+/63xQM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7Lkd0Dt2vI/KDhh/dAquaBBPcEPX065VV+mT9E6bfT4S0V8+GHlWd3zwxMu+GwArfS9D6rXhikatrA/+Ccj0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:12f1:: with SMTP id g104mr12851266otg.149.1580623788219; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 22:09:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jonathan Chen Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 19:09:32 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Port committer request : x11-themes/gartoon-redux To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489LCK6XHVz4XtL X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=mDmo5avB; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::342 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jonc@chen.org.nz) smtp.mailfrom=jonc@chen.org.nz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.45 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[chen.org.nz]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.4.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.16)[ip: (3.03), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.00), asn: 15169(-1.76), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 06:09:51 -0000 Hi, Are there any committers available to review/commit: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243478 It's just an icon collection.. Thanks! -- Jonathan Chen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 08:02:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8023C714 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489Nhy44VKz4dnc for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8BDD823C713; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA5A23C712 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489Nhy3G0mz4dnb for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B5D9CCD1 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01282AmY035106 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 01282AvS035105; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202002020802.01282AvS035105@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 08:02:10 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 08:02:10 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mame | 0.209 | mame0218 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mess | 0.209 | mame0218 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/gnatcross-binutils-aarch64 | 2.27 | 2.34 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 09:11:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C603123E46F for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489QF94t3Kz3G2D for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A74FE23E46E; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A714823E46D for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489QF93vP1z3G2C for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813ADD988 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0129BfAb027388 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0129BfwP027386 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:11:41 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202002020911.0129BfwP027386@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 09:11:41 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.sysutils --- sh: freebsd-version: not found make[5]: "/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/sysutils/etc_os-release/Makefile" line 18: warning: "freebsd-version -u" returned non-zero status --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch6: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport6 Committers on the hook: antoine brnrd gerald mfechner wen woodsb02 yuri Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U databases/mariadb102-server/Makefile U databases/mariadb102-server/distinfo A databases/mariadb102-server/files/patch-MDEV-21592 U databases/p5-DBI/Makefile U databases/p5-DBI/distinfo U databases/p5-DBD-ODBC/Makefile U databases/p5-DBD-ODBC/distinfo U emulators/i386-wine-devel/Makefile.inc U www/gitlab-ce/Makefile U www/gitlab-ce/distinfo U www/gitlab-ce/files/patch-Gemfile U www/gitlab-ce/files/patch-config_gitlab.yml.example U www/gitlab-ce/files/patch-config_initializers_1__settings.rb U www/gitlab-ce/pkg-message U www/gitlab-ce/pkg-plist U www/rubygem-kubeclient/Makefile U www/rubygem-kubeclient/distinfo U www/rubygem-deckar01-task_list/Makefile U www/rubygem-deckar01-task_list/distinfo D www/rubygem-addressable/files U www/rubygem-addressable/Makefile U www/rubygem-addressable/distinfo U devel/gitlab-shell/Makefile U devel/gitlab-shell/distinfo U devel/gitaly/Makefile U devel/gitaly/distinfo U devel/gitaly/files/patch-ruby_Gemfile U devel/gitaly/pkg-plist U devel/rubygem-grape-path-helpers/Makefile U devel/rubygem-grape-path-helpers/distinfo U devel/rubygem-gitlab-labkit/Makefile U devel/rubygem-gitlab-labkit/distinfo U devel/openmp/Makefile U devel/loccount/Makefile U devel/loccount/distinfo U net/rubygem-octokit/Makefile U net/rubygem-octokit/distinfo U net/rubygem-gitaly/Makefile U net/rubygem-gitaly/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch6 A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch6/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch6/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch6/pkg-descr U textproc/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-api6 A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-api6/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-api6/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-api6/pkg-descr A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-model6 A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-model6/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-model6/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-model6/pkg-descr A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-rails6 A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-rails6/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-rails6/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-rails6/pkg-descr A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport6 A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport6/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport6/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-elasticsearch-transport6/pkg-descr U MOVED U astro/p5-Astro-App-Satpass2/Makefile U astro/p5-Astro-App-Satpass2/distinfo U security/vuxml/vuln.xml U misc/netron/Makefile U misc/netron/distinfo U misc/netron/pkg-plist D audio/lv2lint/files U audio/lv2lint/Makefile U audio/lv2lint/distinfo Updated to revision 524833. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 12:10:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A42122C6FB for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489VC528t5z44pV for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4A20E22C6FA; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E8E22C6F9 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489VC50xszz44pT for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02004F9A7 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 012CA8Ux014359 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:08 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 012CA81r014357 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:08 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:10:08 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202002021210.012CA81r014357@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 12:10:09 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 15:36:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA7C231AA3 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489Zmp20HXz4JR1 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 42AD0231AA2; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42718231AA1 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489Zmn0n4Wz4JR0 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id fad118db for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:36:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id de30722f for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:36:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 126bbe80 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:36:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id da8256f6 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:36:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:36:00 -0500 From: ajtiM To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489Zmn0n4Wz4JR0 X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-2.17)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 78.46.0.0/15(0.63), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.223.46.78.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 15:36:10 -0000 Update of xterm to version 253 has a problem: =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user =3D=3D=3D> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building =3D> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xterm-353.tgz. =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. =3D=3D=3D> Giving up on fetching files: xterm-353.tgz=20 Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/x11/xterm/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=3Dyes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for x11/xterm =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for x11/xterm failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update Thank you. --=20 =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D.=20 Napoleon Bonaparte From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 15:38:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FC2231D22 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489Zpw3Zc4z4JpL for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:38:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7b48f411; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:37:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6d4c60e3; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:37:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f1d68a16; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:37:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bd39fe20 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:37:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:37:55 -0500 From: ajtiM To: Kevin Oberman Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: openblas-0.3.7_1,1 error install Message-ID: <20200202103755.65512e45@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <2365de86-89a7-eba7-cf43-384990019353@gmail.com> <987f41fc-65e9-ebd6-4b8e-390b6837ecc0@FreeBSD.org> <20200131114201.717290fb@dismail.de> <20200131174723.528480a5@dismail.de> <0bb675ff-8324-3fa6-f6f6-379fda3fe406@FreeBSD.org> <20200131184939.57d4c048@dismail.de> <20200201064408.04a44f69@dismail.de> <20200201163941.137f9122@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489Zpw3Zc4z4JpL X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-2.17)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 78.46.0.0/15(0.62), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.223.46.78.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 15:38:01 -0000 On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 17:15:31 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > I can't say anything about the missing library issue as I have not > seen it. It is true that cblas and openblas now conflict. That is > because openblas added cblas emulation that duplicates the libraries > cblas installed. It is important that openblas be re-installed after > cblas is deleted as it probably will delete files that openblas > installs. I deleted both cblas and openblas (pkg delete -f cblas > openblas) and then installed openblas. When I tried installing > py-numpy@py27, it still failed, still trying to link to cblas stuff. > Something was cached somewhere. I tried a couple of days later, after > a reboot, and it built perfectly. I don't know if it was the reboot > or something else, but everything builds and works fine, now. -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 >=20 >=20 Thank you. I did the same but I have problem with missing libraries sill. --=20 =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D.=20 Napoleon Bonaparte From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 15:42:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A2F2320FD for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489ZwY4jX1z4KH1 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A19F62320FC; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A163E2320FB for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (107-204-234-170.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489ZwX5tr1z4KH0 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 012FgReh001723; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 15:42:27 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 012FgRsW001722; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 07:42:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 07:42:27 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: ajtiM Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489ZwX5tr1z4KH0 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.95 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-2.55)[ip: (-9.65), ipnet: 107.192.0.0/12(-4.82), asn: 7018(1.78), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 15:42:53 -0000 --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 10:36:00AM -0500, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > Update of xterm to version 253 has a problem: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user > =3D=3D=3D> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building > =3D> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xterm-353.tgz. > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. > =3D=3D=3D> Giving up on fetching files: xterm-353.tgz=20 > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/x11/xterm/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=3Dyes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > .... I don't see that: g1-55(12.1-S)[1] pkg info -o xterm\* xterm-353 x11/xterm g1-55(12.1-S)[2] make -C /usr/ports/x11/xterm checksum =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user =3D=3D=3D> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for xterm-353.tgz. =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. g1-55(12.1-S)[3] uname -a FreeBSD g1-55.catwhisker.org 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE #594 r357402M/= 357406: Sun Feb 2 03:44:20 PST 2020 root@g1-55.catwhisker.org:/common/= S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 g1-55(12.1-S)[4] svn info /usr/ports Path: /usr/ports Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: file:///svn/freebsd/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: file:///svn/freebsd/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 524937 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: sunpoet Last Changed Rev: 524937 Last Changed Date: 2020-02-02 03:07:56 -0800 (Sun, 02 Feb 2020) g1-55(12.1-S)[5]=20 Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org McConnell's Senators are covering up their whitewash of Trump's malfeasance. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl427eNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PckEHgf/cfiGunXGBAYXJkdCraADF/c865jxJcs6+ak7oo5LheG03ctxbvmPJsrV uEQf0ff277V6BNJNYpOpn/UAB1+9My1E6ZKGeaRfLmOXc4NuKkaEFg3qEvheNYcK BNX4IoL/es0m66X34zMukUGgN5LmCtsl7GEUdkrcopSKnbY7GxoctB/OqwSID1+n +H41OKTb7//zw0WT0JRc2Y5324oEWdClPGZspDbGM07dch0+bNggJyZgrh8AFJfb 2HWsIU0z8M6o8S/jxsfi55F3Nqndl5f06LWaBrTMJy8Dp0UPdNWy2H90FJtR2889 /ra9v5ocpLscQqFbQuhYhDFpx1ZWSQ== =Ufa6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 17:11:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA04233D6C for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 17:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489ctl0Qpgz4PTk for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 17:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 27e49c2e for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:11:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2f23918c for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:11:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7fa981f0 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:11:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 067202ef (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:11:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:11:18 -0500 From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489ctl0Qpgz4PTk X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-2.17)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 78.46.0.0/15(0.60), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.223.46.78.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 17:11:27 -0000 On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 07:42:27 -0800 David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 10:36:00AM -0500, ajtiM via freebsd-ports > wrote: > > Update of xterm to version 253 has a problem: > >=20 > > =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user > > =3D=3D=3D> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > > =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building > > =3D> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xterm-353.tgz. > > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. > > =3D=3D=3D> Giving up on fetching files: xterm-353.tgz=20 > > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file > > (/usr/ports/x11/xterm/distinfo) are up to date. If you are > > absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make > > NO_CHECKSUM=3Dyes [other args]". *** Error code 1 > > .... >=20 > I don't see that: >=20 > g1-55(12.1-S)[1] pkg info -o xterm\* > xterm-353 x11/xterm > g1-55(12.1-S)[2] make -C /usr/ports/x11/xterm checksum > =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user > =3D=3D=3D> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for xterm-353.tgz. > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. > g1-55(12.1-S)[3] uname -a > FreeBSD g1-55.catwhisker.org 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE #594 > r357402M/357406: Sun Feb 2 03:44:20 PST 2020 > root@g1-55.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY > amd64 g1-55(12.1-S)[4] svn info /usr/ports Path: /usr/ports Working > Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: file:///svn/freebsd/ports/head > Relative URL: ^/head > Repository Root: file:///svn/freebsd/ports > Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 > Revision: 524937 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: sunpoet > Last Changed Rev: 524937 > Last Changed Date: 2020-02-02 03:07:56 -0800 (Sun, 02 Feb 2020) >=20 > g1-55(12.1-S)[5]=20 >=20 > Peace, > david Lucky you but not me: pkg info -o xterm\* xterm-352 x11/xterm root@lumiwa:~# make -C /usr/ports/x11/xterm checksum =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user =3D=3D=3D> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building =3D> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xterm-353.tgz. =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. =3D=3D=3D> Refetch for 1 more times files: xterm-353.tgz=20 =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user =3D=3D=3D> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D> xterm-353.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. =3D> Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm-353.tgz fetch: ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm-353.tgz: Permission denied =3D> Attempting to fetch https://invisible-mirror.net/archives/xterm/xterm-353.tgz xterm-353.tgz 1374 kB 358 kBps 04s =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building =3D=3D=3D> License MIT accepted by the user =3D=3D=3D> xterm-3= 53 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building =3D> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xterm-353.tgz. =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. =3D=3D=3D> Giving up on fetching files: xterm-353.tgz Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/x11/xterm/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=3Dyes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm --=20 =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D.=20 Napoleon Bonaparte From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 17:38:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ED5234B74 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 17:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489dVL4dCTz4RZs for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 17:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 94ee4564 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:38:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f63c72a3 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:38:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 99b846a4 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:38:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 481ad2b8 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:38:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:38:45 -0500 From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489dVL4dCTz4RZs X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-2.18)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 78.46.0.0/15(0.59), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.223.46.78.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 17:38:51 -0000 On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:11:18 -0500 ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: I did solve the problem with download file from the xterm web site. compile and it works. The tgz file which automatically download from mirror site is not good. Thank you. --=20 =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D.=20 Napoleon Bonaparte From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 18:55:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16562367B6 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vtr.rulingia.com (vtr.rulingia.com [IPv6:2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vtr.rulingia.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489gBW6Y5Mz4WQJ for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from server.rulingia.com (ppp239-208.static.internode.on.net [59.167.239.208]) by vtr.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 012Isp0b082305 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:54:57 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 012IskUb055194 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:54:46 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 012Isk1O055193; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:54:46 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:54:46 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: ajtiM Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489gBW6Y5Mz4WQJ X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of peter@rulingia.com designates 2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peter@rulingia.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.55 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[rulingia.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5800::/38, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.15)[ip: (-9.75), ipnet: 2001:19f0:5800::/38(-4.24), asn: 20473(-1.71), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 18:55:17 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-Feb-02 12:38:45 -0500, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: >On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:11:18 -0500 >ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > >I did solve the problem with download file from the xterm web site. >compile and it works. The tgz file which automatically download from >mirror site is not good. This is what the ports checksums are intended to protect against. If you are inclined, you could compare the contents of both files and report the differences upstream - particularly if there has been a malicious change. --=20 Peter Jeremy --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE7rKYbDBnHnTmXCJ+FqWXoOSiCzQFAl43GuFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEVF QjI5ODZDMzA2NzFFNzRFNjVDMjI3RTE2QTU5N0EwRTRBMjBCMzQACgkQFqWXoOSi CzSxcw/+OJe+FEq+x4xdyLM1S5H7hBVKapL3yn01pqnf+rYxRcrnWfL2q6NWUjz7 /jM5hs2wFzUYVP+7czkf+dqHy6n56gGK26e9kCAnsaBWUh3FEsvkufXMpf9V+2+q B9uUiGu9q+omWT+JBSIP7gpWoj/AyB3i/wXxEidPqWpYmC/5bfdl67jQgriHtphk 5d4dfDQQr/MmrPHXSoopaTr4Cldkvp+VzTHx22/YE75YtiU2L6qmGAoEyzqjK9Oy bxDKXWaH381VnlHMfGf/9KWalNR8lfoUDdyzSkThh1SUeCqVc2Q3kz3GO3Sq+5mf 0jCLln7ALLt2Xtn5sgDNRWi3fc76a1xBBBFco5bcf2Nkt62VSLa7XSWvyvRttdss m6x5J+Mz44ascLRPn9RJr8KRwr562DeucqqrtqySQzHlxFIuC655YdVFB48MyiaK niJdL7OqHiGVF1xinAYehh5tp/esNnAUPvqmuR87Dr229cBdjWaUTaNCTjN7dMFy ihUYLKtJvjHOgc63KT4LLgskeqjMQZRvDMLC6nIequEcAbvykiM1P3Jjl3myoeBW 8fi5wgqJgORg/LrF+vsfDzlqK/EfZzKrar/saYvBXWfqbgUQuyYW3oGLdIqW72ry wPt2k4ZRPLBuzqMFGiOC9dmMHhYYte66A5P6YsTguooehqZ3Z8A= =4BQi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 2 20:50:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B8A23978C for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [88.198.69.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489jlx6HFjz4dYb for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from squirrel.exwg.net (unknown [212.76.253.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "squirrel.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4522C00316; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 21:50:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by squirrel.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 761BF2B301; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 21:50:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 21:50:51 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: Peter Jeremy Cc: ajtiM , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489jlx6HFjz4dYb X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 88.198.69.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.198.69.140]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[140.69.198.88.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; IP_SCORE(-1.50)[ip: (-9.74), ipnet: 88.198.0.0/16(3.78), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 20:50:54 -0000 Thomas, care to check the latest xterm tar file on the mirror? ## Peter Jeremy (peter@rulingia.com): > If you are inclined, you could compare the contents of both files and > report the differences upstream - particularly if there has been a > malicious change. In fact, https://invisible-mirror.net/archives/xterm/xterm-353.tgz is ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm-353.tgz gzipped once over again. The file from the mirror fails the GPG signature check and has sha256 0ef2e2fdfade2dfba41f7babeb1066886fd3c8c6aa6dd057fbce3d59a8848aa6 and can be gunzipped to reveal a tgz file with sha256 e521d3ee9def61f5d5c911afc74dd5c3a56ce147c7071c74023ea24cac9bb768 - that file can be verified with the GPG signature and matches the sha256sum the ports tree expects. (In fact, the file from the mirror can't even be "tar xzf"ed, as it's not a tar inside a gz but a tar inside a gz inside a gz). Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 3 03:17:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E971724176B for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 03:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489tLF5TDHz40Yc for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 03:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iySF1-00006a-MC for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 20:17:39 -0700 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1iySF1-0003aR-8f for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 20:17:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19212161E8D for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:17:39 -0700 (MST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 0S2HRyI31TH7 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:17:39 -0700 (MST) Received: from photon.int.bluestop.org (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E92DC160C44 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:17:38 -0700 (MST) To: freebsd-ports From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <538468e1-015b-d20d-3f25-54cd3b91d3ea@bsdio.com> Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:17:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1iySF1-0003aR-8f; ; ; mid=<538468e1-015b-d20d-3f25-54cd3b91d3ea@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.67; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG, XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5183] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches * everything in local email X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;freebsd-ports X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 213 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (1.4%), b_tie_ro: 1.98 (0.9%), parse: 1.01 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 3.8 (1.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.32 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.7 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.29 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 1.05 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 14 (6.8%), check_bayes: 13 (6.1%), b_tokenize: 4.2 (2.0%), b_tok_get_all: 3.6 (1.7%), b_comp_prob: 1.43 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 1.66 (0.8%), b_finish: 0.66 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 176 (82.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.48 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 80 (37.4%), poll_dns_idle: 74 (34.6%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (1.0%), tests_pri_500: 6 (2.9%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: MOVEDlint.awk reports for 133 ports "does not have the py36 flavor" X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 489tLF5TDHz40Yc X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com has no SPF policy when checking 166.70.13.231) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.71 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[57.16.52.174.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[231.13.70.166.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.47)[0.470,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.23)[-0.233,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[231.13.70.166.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.68)[ip: (-0.70), ipnet: 166.70.0.0/16(2.30), asn: 6315(1.84), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 03:17:43 -0000 Is Tools/scripts/MOVEDlint.awk broken, or do ports need updated? I added a new entry to MOVED and ran MOVEDlint.awk and got 133 lines with e.g.: 9666: net/py-urllib3 does not have the py36 flavor -- Rebecca Cran From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 3 05:06:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778402430DD for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489wlJ2Zw9z44mH for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 56D7D2430DC; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569D32430DB for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489wlJ1Rvsz44mG; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:4d2d:d80c:8ab:d81f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 234A819130; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 05:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:05:57 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: ajtiM Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200203050557.56dvazusgibplnat@icepick.vmeta.jp> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE amd64 References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 05:06:04 -0000 Reported to the maintainer. It should be fixed shortly. On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 10:36:00AM -0500, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > Update of xterm to version 253 has a problem: > > ===> License MIT accepted by the user > ===> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for xterm-353.tgz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-xterm-icons-1.tgz. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: xterm-353.tgz > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/x11/xterm/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/x11/xterm > > ===>>> make build failed for x11/xterm > ===>>> Aborting update > > ===>>> Update for x11/xterm failed > ===>>> Aborting update > > Thank you. > > -- > “In politics stupidity is not a handicap”. > > Napoleon Bonaparte > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 3 07:50:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F92457F7 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 07:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [88.198.69.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B0PJ3sLcz4ChH for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 07:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from squirrel.exwg.net (unknown [212.76.253.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "squirrel.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671A5C00316; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 08:50:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by squirrel.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FB7D2B301; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 08:50:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 08:50:42 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: Thomas Dickey Cc: Peter Jeremy , ajtiM , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Thomas E. Dickey" Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48B0PJ3sLcz4ChH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 88.198.69.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.01 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.198.69.140]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[140.69.198.88.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; IP_SCORE(-1.51)[ip: (-9.74), ipnet: 88.198.0.0/16(3.76), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 07:50:45 -0000 ## Thomas Dickey (dickey@his.com): > The server is compressing the output... > Not all browsers have the problem :-( You're right. For some reason, firefox is not handling the additional compression correctly (I see Content-Encoding: gzip in the headers, so it's advertised, but not unzipped by the browser, so I get a double- compressed file. Oh tempora, oh mores). Not enough time to dig into that right now. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 3 12:38:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA2724BD90 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B6my49pRz4VqQ for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8D2E624BD8F; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF0724BD8E for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B6mx4XD3z4VqP; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12C033E28; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 07:38:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from anthias (ip-109-41-192-238.web.vodafone.de [109.41.192.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4823D33E01; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 07:38:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:37:58 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mark Linimon cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, ericbsd@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFD: status of Ada-related ports (including ports-mgmt/synth) In-Reply-To: <20191231033439.GD16175@lonesome.com> Message-ID: References: <20191231033439.GD16175@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48B6mx4XD3z4VqP X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gerald@pfeifer.com designates 209.68.5.143 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gerald@pfeifer.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:hamza.pair.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pfeifer.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.93)[ip: (-6.64), ipnet: 209.68.0.0/18(-1.86), asn: 7859(-1.07), country: US(-0.05)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[238.192.41.109.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7859, ipnet:209.68.0.0/18, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 12:38:10 -0000 [ I found this in my outgoing folder; ahem. ] On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Mark Linimon wrote: > As of the following commit, lang/gcc6 is no longer supported: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?revision=521584 GCC 6 hasn't been supported upstream for over a year (end of life) and is not covered by Mk/bsd.gcc.mk (aka USE_GCC) any longer. The port is still in our tree for the time being, though I marked it for expiration end of February - which gives an extra day this year. ;-) > I would like to, if possible, eliminate gcc6, as it merely adds > build time on the package builders. Is this a concern for all architectures, or mostly non-x86? We can always restrict ONLY_FOR_ARCHS further for such ports if those focusing on those architectures are in favor. [ Editorial note: In the meantime I made such a change for lang/gcc48. ] > There is a variant of lang/gcc6 called lang/gcc6-aux, which is now only > required for the Ada-related ports, including ports-mgmt/synth. fwiw, > that port is only available for aarch64/amd64/i386. > > Is anyone willing to take on the work to upgrade our Ada support to > some later compiler, so that we can delete lang/gcc6-aux as well? lang/gcc6-aux/files carries a lot of patches (2500+ lines) that I don't believe should be FreeBSD-local, but upstreamable/upstreamed. Also there are some small local patches, some backports, in lang/gcc7 and later especially, that really matter. Any FreeBSD port around GCC probably would want to use those - which is not the case right now. Gerald From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 3 19:38:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8E822C4C9 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 19:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from viclamta01p.bpe.bigpond.com (viclamta01p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BJ643c53z3ydY for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 19:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.26.4]) by viclafep01p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20200203193831.YBDG6512.viclafep01p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:38:31 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrgeejgdduvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesthdttddttdervdenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucfkphepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqedprhgtphhtthhopeeofhhrvggvsghsugdqphhorhhtshesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgheq X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.418) id 5DF700CC083F244D for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:38:30 +1100 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 013JcTOR049999 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:38:29 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 013JcToP049996 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:38:29 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:38:28 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: xterm-353 In-Reply-To: <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> Message-ID: References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BJ643c53z3ydY X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dave@horsfall.org has no SPF policy when checking 203.38.21.65) smtp.mailfrom=dave@horsfall.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[horsfall.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.21.38.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.17)[ipnet: 203.36.0.0/14(-3.73), asn: 1221(-2.12), country: AU(0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 19:38:38 -0000 On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > You're right. For some reason, firefox is not handling the additional > compression correctly (I see Content-Encoding: gzip in the headers, so > it's advertised, but not unzipped by the browser, so I get a double- > compressed file. Oh tempora, oh mores). Not enough time to dig into that > right now. FWIW, I find that Firefox is becoming increasingly unreliable, with "dead" buttons etc (yes, I have JS enabled against my better judgement) and have to use Safari/Chrome instead. This is a pity, as I find that FF is much faster and I've used it for many years. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 3 22:31:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EEF230EF2 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 22:31:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout001aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BMy60B68z4Dhh for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 22:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id ykFzibEtf9GgiykFzi5CYE; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 22:31:51 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Cb52G4jl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=DBwwDor5xuMA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=bZ3QWahGMDAHxrp-gn8A:9 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFD: status of Ada-related ports (including ports-mgmt/synth) References: <20191231033439.GD16175@lonesome.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCFDems+lE9lNFgir7jgahFg9NRSWuGw9Z8YCNqaYRzRH8u5g14Q+ilh2F28IQDySCmE4gXH02qU9s6bRBEuSuAezFcmekTbySIOV5VroQitUaH2PUOV KcUIRTPGBiBwmBMqJIf7Xx7IZ+cyACuYzNeIpTITspH9SaTD1WsZrOYH X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BMy60B68z4Dhh X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.132 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.42 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[163.177.28.96.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; MISSING_DATE(1.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.23)[0.228,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.992,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 47.43.24.0/21(-0.50), asn: 40294(0.84), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 22:31:59 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 22:31:59 -0000 > [ I found this in my outgoing folder; ahem. ] > On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Mark Linimon wrote: > > As of the following commit, lang/gcc6 is no longer supported: > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?revision=521584 > GCC 6 hasn't been supported upstream for over a year (end of life) > and is not covered by Mk/bsd.gcc.mk (aka USE_GCC) any longer. The > port is still in our tree for the time being, though I marked it for > expiration end of February - which gives an extra day this year. ;-) > > I would like to, if possible, eliminate gcc6, as it merely adds > > build time on the package builders. > Is this a concern for all architectures, or mostly non-x86? We > can always restrict ONLY_FOR_ARCHS further for such ports if those > focusing on those architectures are in favor. > [ Editorial note: In the meantime I made such a change for lang/gcc48. ] > > There is a variant of lang/gcc6 called lang/gcc6-aux, which is now only > > required for the Ada-related ports, including ports-mgmt/synth. fwiw, > > that port is only available for aarch64/amd64/i386. > > > Is anyone willing to take on the work to upgrade our Ada support to > > some later compiler, so that we can delete lang/gcc6-aux as well? > lang/gcc6-aux/files carries a lot of patches (2500+ lines) that I > don't believe should be FreeBSD-local, but upstreamable/upstreamed. > Also there are some small local patches, some backports, in lang/gcc7 > and later especially, that really matter. Any FreeBSD port around GCC > probably would want to use those - which is not the case right now. > Gerald The following is a message I posted last September 10 to freebsd-ports: Subject: gcc(6)-aux falling behind? I notice gcc advancing to 7.4, 8.3 and 9.2 while gcc-aux has not gone above v6. I believe this is the only Ada compiler for FreeBSD and NetBSD. Would it be possible to build a gcc that includes Ada using gcc6-aux on the source code for gcc 7.4 or 8.3? Fact that it hasn't been done suggests there might be a reason why. I had even thought about the possibility of using gcc6-aux or gcc5-aux to cross-compile a gcc for Linux. (end of message from last September 10) Even if ports-mgmt/synth becomes deprecated, I believe Ada support ought to be retained in ports/lang. I hope gcc6-aux will not be allowed to expire until something is in place to succeed it. One problem porting Ada compiler to other architectures is the need for bootstrap which must be in Ada (catch-22). I notice synth has not been updated in some time. I want to use or try synth on this computer if I continue with FreeBSD and ports just to see if it will build and work. On FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE, synth built but didn't work well, building only a small minority of ports it was tried on. On FreeBSD-current (then releng 12), trying to build synth led to system crash and reboot (unclean, I had to run fsck_ffs from NetBSD). Synth did better on the other computer, suggesting FreeBSD may be allergic to the MSI MPOWER motherboard, or not fully compatible. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 01:39:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8085B238173 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BS6z32Cnz4TQd for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id z2so16829521oih.6 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:39:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qLPTRASL/vXd7bnNH41S3CIfeNqMPIMowcPyLkHNqpI=; b=pVexla50VJEMekgkIpV8NmSA3ScapTLMJEzX5EafYECGHQzsVMwXiEu1/Xf8WS6MVz KT0Z7JrEAtFER/ZHwkfWGBuiiFs6m1lyZz4Qcj5Xi71zqChUExf1Tc3rS1SsVBsGzxEN cJkO+X+M+/aTwCRT5yLhefH76EDjC8eW5Xg0WkcPJ/x0jEQQ6U5MC3SUJMzIt6VBlCtR Mn0ut/fWpd5wvjkwxZD17nl+xmbiLhVxB4VTsZ47WDjClixrnbJhxmfLBi4fKrEY59UT Sf7oS5izQvG3cjdds1Ds7YIaAzYrp4U0xAP/hGGc+n8IC+O7CEkHOCbWvYQKzfACozei al7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qLPTRASL/vXd7bnNH41S3CIfeNqMPIMowcPyLkHNqpI=; b=jf+PrFMoA+ohoCFg1utu8mL6iEdOtET/82gaWEMkis63Mk0FKMZn1uGWXr1hGGddkV EyaYtFN/cQ+071Smygg4Q7z3HcW8+b50ZMafffgmFHWop0e6KaxO3TVA//kX8msvCZH0 oC1Xgq138NdAvEk7WWpXVjGdR7yfhcPwheO5rp4PBuZmN6f9hhEy2CBdfAHJ4Cb079al Gozkh5xdPcjWVYO2RPl1hwR6jfipv9vkUxJCIqGzD/2AQXz5TQ4xGcZMNxj13cNgYV2t qyFpdtd4kG7WbBzqOOiSiexJS3aBFK6u644u1DWVNH40zsF2dwK89671M5RWAMWkH2gf sTjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8v8SAWiHEg9h7UEE8gqb3gY6WKhuOYlCWtc99oFsdSAQrR6mJ ueaP+KoaCqjClp3Ub6rNbQggumzzRv8Bhf6HU1zCG329Og8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy+FR8j2xGI4s1zS/2tWRpKcZmSlPN9HBTZweG/NMzov8C5corHJ5eF4rIKnfJTNiUNnWfdtiQDdIXECFnilK4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1708:: with SMTP id j8mr1632494oii.166.1580780393736; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:39:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Oberman Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 17:39:36 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: xterm-353 To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BS6z32Cnz4TQd X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pVexla50; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-8.93), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.99), asn: 15169(-1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.3.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 01:39:56 -0000 This is quite surprising as I have not seen this. I do get occasional dead buttons due to all of the privacy add-ons I run, especially No-Script, but also less intrusive ones like Privacy Badger. I have seen a few issues with sites taking advantage of some JS functions outside of the standard that Chrome has added and Firefox has not yet picked up. This is the fault of Chrome playing the old IE game of making other browsers notwork correctly on some pages. I also have to fake the UI identifier for some sites as they reject access from FreeBSD (Chase Bank, I'm looking at you!) or do the wrong thing. As regards chromium, I have deleted it it and will not consider ever using it due to it's massive data collection and its blocking privacy tools like No-Script. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:38 AM Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > > > You're right. For some reason, firefox is not handling the additional > > compression correctly (I see Content-Encoding: gzip in the headers, so > > it's advertised, but not unzipped by the browser, so I get a double- > > compressed file. Oh tempora, oh mores). Not enough time to dig into that > > right now. > > FWIW, I find that Firefox is becoming increasingly unreliable, with "dead" > buttons etc (yes, I have JS enabled against my better judgement) and have > to use Safari/Chrome instead. This is a pity, as I find that FF is much > faster and I've used it for many years. > > -- Dave > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 06:37:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0A923D684 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@661.org) Received: from hermes.661.org (hermes.661.org [192.81.131.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BZkq5zZQz4kRX for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@661.org) Received: by hermes.661.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F7AC1FFD0; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.661.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6651E1C7 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 06:37:53 +0000 (UTC) From: David Griffith To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Seeking flavors examples and advice Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BZkq5zZQz4kRX X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dave@661.org has no SPF policy when checking 192.81.131.210) smtp.mailfrom=dave@661.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.13 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.904,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.963,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[661.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.26)[asn: 63949(-1.24), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:63949, ipnet:192.81.131.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 06:37:57 -0000 Would someone please point me to a simple example of FLAVORS being used to build something in ports to select different targets. I recently took over games/frotz for which I am also upstream. This package can be built with three different user interfaces with one of them having two sub-variations. There are curses-nosound, curses (uses libao for audio output), dumb (no screen handling at all), and SDL (uses libsdl for graphics and audio). When building straight from source, you simply do "gmake curses", "gmake nosound", "gmake dumb", or "gmake sdl" and you get the interface specified by the parameter supplied to gmake. I can't seem to find any webpage that goes into any more detail than https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/flavors-using.html and this leaves me wondering just how to even start. Here's what I have so far: targeting noaudio and dumb for starters. I'm leaving out documentation and examples for now until I figure this out. Both the noaudio and dumb targets will build, but when I do "make install" or "make FLAVOR=dumb install", nothing actually gets put into /usr/local/bin. # Created by: Andrey Zakhvatov # $FreeBSD: head/games/frotz/Makefile 522166 2020-01-05 19:39:46Z tcberner $ PORTNAME= frotz PORTVERSION= 2.50 CATEGORIES= games MAINTAINER= dave@661.org COMMENT= Infocom Z-machine games interpreter LICENSE= GPLv2+ LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING USE_GITLAB= yes GL_ACCOUNT= DavidGriffith GL_COMMIT= 9867a1f14da1e9c0707492d2ac74d1e8ffdd3a64 USES= gmake FLAVORS= curses dumb FLAVOR?= ${FLAVORS:[1]} curses_PKGNAMESUFFIX= -curses dumb_PKGNAMESUFFIX= -dumb curses_PLIST= bin/frotz\ man/man6/frotz.6.gz dumb_PLIST= bin/dfrotz\ man/man6/dfrotz.6.gz .if ${FLAVOR:U} == curses COMMENT+= (curses interface, no audio) ALL_TARGET= nosound USES+= ncurses .elif ${FLAVOR:U} == dumb COMMENT+= (dumb interface) ALL_TARGET= dumb dumb_PKGNAMEPREFIX= d .endif MAKE_ENV= OPTS="${CFLAGS}" CONFIG_DIR="${PREFIX}/etc" do-install: ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/ ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME}.6 ${STAGEDIR}${MAN6PREFIX}/man/man6/ .include -- David Griffith dave@661.org A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 07:34:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853E823EDCE for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Bc0N31V7z4nYg for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6784B23EDCB; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674DD23EDCA for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Bc0N21Y1z4nYb for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BA9E3D3 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0147YiKV088493 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0147YiBh088492; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202002040734.0147YiBh088492@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:34:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 07:34:44 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/ocsinventory-agent | 2.4.2 | v2.6.0-mac ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 08:49:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F1B2405A9 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Bdfx4SFDz4rmX for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 98C8824058F; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9873424058E; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Bdfw3Ctzz4rmQ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id f24so11628037lfh.3; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:49:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:subject:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qkLp4pCO5TGzLyPkvH0B5zQGe3rXtfT8XPtiq1clB4s=; b=Q42bmuex+EhTNjRIA+PukRWwBrS1riT+fUeFJAVSehro14gMInvHlriJ14AzbtG6x/ ZaGyvgWs0Qoj3nQ0jwmtt+wIFJHRxtIg8GhuoLKtRDew7r1PONQV+kiphWEHT6RHyb9X DLHlWlqITU7AXqGVzvUZer8BkgGusQn1R6otlpWF1vdc5u3wEjy7lpagM16DEJpwLExt tbQ0ygJJprg2gf0M2VR0tUexmpPsJKb7/6YAWwvdvqHBvRnDxD06av/PnoLgvhwsHd7l MTg2m9h8Clcn+dxeQbW91zERXHPhiQ2chAvbl6Qvv6OB+r/scUjoXGon3QWa4Oj1IBSK CGtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:from:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qkLp4pCO5TGzLyPkvH0B5zQGe3rXtfT8XPtiq1clB4s=; b=PYlE0TBsw/6k1i+Y4X3DnpA7tTCaWmCH/A3IxFmOQUc0APiTMxXmM0PUoErENqKGcf mNoA7OG7gbQoCwfLIrYlkqr02d1QM63XyKt5dc/agROtDV8E8naVmOf2PSJtO+P7aOS/ xT4dfEgahCEnG2goVYToRFtIwRgoAIkU+W3VT+UugZJJ5ciYTjAnber0QY1aWiwe2I4l AykQF3ULJeT3NUfugZlLq+VmMo/pX86ChI7j0FJDQsqIcVi7X2BQwUj5ioehIh4qwj4S OVVAzOKVNppCT3Ln5drT21yK37jZCj2av3XcDndQay7GGA9gK1PHhyKq41hJPdbHiYwX Ttkw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPGUsugKHfBqKsRJ6eAb0XZW1acTgdc3T0xBHGVxofaVJhSTBX lGeWZMWZqG6Zw65RGBn0xjkhpFap X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyxccFLuh+UiAqTDyCcAIfq/8LMmOudVD36T+iC33aVbmYNR19OuErdgy24uI4TpR2U+aYh9w== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:47ec:: with SMTP id b12mr14459881lfp.162.1580806181378; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from alex.super (stone.g-service.ru. [84.22.141.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y23sm11145864ljk.6.2020.02.04.00.49.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:49:40 -0800 (PST) To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: firefox-73.0,1 error build From: "Alex V. Petrov" Autocrypt: addr=alexvpetrov@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFr3oA0BEADMSXiVd/IwYhJPMQ6LXbZ7jTA/RXuzrGYaR++UENx5QJ6/HJ/3myTeMnZE nNa0Zme+oKw/9s5x7rBTP6mL5ta7VSYpnPX932mAjT9J4nS7iW/wWNBqcXn7wDCog2TV8Ww3 13SUP2YaKoJKJLxddiZD6AJrkafB9EE/AycMQ8XxMao1lVS+/KAo0yciOsnSlIJCWhF00b3j xDlHLvehrDa4S3EB13bF6uE0XU5nFfMNHtBav2mwD9t01hNioCNTV1hXwmsS/L1n5PR5FyJJ yYtjeohrAUiGKGJU9lJJ6tROBhzV/k3OsOGPyajFOVsW0vUueYfgw+IAPYdOZIAONgNdxkvs tRLQxYPCBMN1FvQ7GlIhq7ob+mxuA1imXx3xzlYy5tu4QzB383qZtLqQnZpysjYooAbHl+eN vB2ldvH9TZxm3fxxNL6zgYAXE/pNgFoqg/ILmhDwvvHzApHqVCKU3g6yii0KPxD7susaUWcL JYgrmt2BIE0RuiQRGWyS0L277D/YGmVnPNHxPi58DBs2iexDm7jw7PhlmfOw44N9w+O09D2S gqmBHySAtsq9Z5LoM81F+LrOoVmpYczZWErS917Gua1X7K3wrXoqQC8qcSiHZpEcBl/Uohii QWzjQJot5LT7rvfFHpnSOXAKgN7enVM7KxTJAYK1U343GGdepQARAQABtDZBbGV4VlBldHJv diAoZmlyc3QgZ2xvYmFsIGtleSkgPGFsZXh2cGV0cm92QGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JAk4EEwEIADgW IQRvKPTT2TJuh37ANx313p8aVpVkcAUCWvegDQIbAwULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX gAAKCRD13p8aVpVkcLLeEADClYAElEInGGjtLfH4jdjvTDaQTsrwT5/1E5/h8yxI4yn7hCt1 Dh+iCSUNLdPO88nZV2jP8bMQXFBKSbC0nAJXd8O+8t9AfSWoUC6IMzncxKTK/jZuJTCToCUR XZ+47+uJaBp51rpw3pFX8UrFlYSF6Dz97dI2cGHfx3xAOnowKxyHfthxS8waKWgbMOceds78 BP2+Q0iLCpoC9rO4KDc+w+h8z21eHIE9VHadTHpnKVF82voPH8XWvznTOCpYrdBwUtIyD/DV XRb0xcFsOSkvmReYX7u4QuOPLSc86sEWh4hXTFLAOdfeTjrDTDmBcmFpltmW1j+5t4mI1dK8 gptREM8gMJVJw3jjcO6jADeXX9q5C8/lX0sEGz9uC4oU5nkOMyfzd9Anb+9bCs7pMxhqAKjA 8tqJPPkmJU8WzMCs+uudIiQ8W9qIETwUJWxizQ3kvlzLfWRz5n93Y9kzSmjw81aiIJK/HFY8 wsW5zNo6JBn57cMPx8nBC4E2zM09ffmqSpjDwXfvZF2IIR8L4VTiKi3ovwLglJP+Qbs5HXNn 6K40cPNqfnHzPLwXwd/co04B/VVr+cKZuE58kYGty9Xs9q/SEpObDnxnLxMNHUNJJuRgOiti TKDkteHuKm6NA8v05o3TDQ5HU9szEoE5uoi/3pQ1ktfA/K3LkDwbotXL+7kCDQRa96ANARAA w5+/xcaCP6iwsi2CFQ4pAWksdmPBEHA2VPn1ym3C6opjbyWUp6sn25eTWppdhA9rUqbM/zV/ hAFRT67oZJKBYNRaMoDdO8BsVZsg/u76QF/GuhbUjIk0tFFdpddMXl0zKAJJMCfDRxURRWv7 NW6sY/EZ4Dal5s4xOT+UrWGag3qoaIRdzw5bJRP+o75L90cE8pd7+Pd9cVJOOtTAwx0E4bPq dPSa6CPDSvzd9D3mw37dPzXysyQkQTy0OM7255E2wjYz3RbJxB3utybPVN3XJBD5EyA8IYeS ic1/03UrkRNv4XrLnlg7xLv96ZeCrf/BDNQW23iVwbISUAk4TXL7xs2TGYOmowZ89mMEcbfW ChX3YLAuAeWzgpMcrDC00izOxG0spkkrHL7/i1iSu2MKhv5qMTVgchlSktdd+KTba5keleHv ULQ3feGUKf9eTkKgES6q4rKrae0tIwByTLhhDVbkXqR6v8zrpJSscrvJ3tMNgquJKy5ATIUB nvUE2hMkSwtnJ2vQ/Z0zGt6c5KxI57/hsb148tXp1v3gAq9d6i8c8ChxSR/kUlqAvzl2QGcn CFVN6nfOzyNfBPZ61abNzkzjzyhOK4Gq4gQvx4QXhDp3jEME7rPM0Tqf0venb1Dp7SIHwggV yJglGApwoUvD4kKNIC7KDr+s/UjbBp4ExFMAEQEAAYkCNgQYAQgAIBYhBG8o9NPZMm6HfsA3 HfXenxpWlWRwBQJa96ANAhsMAAoJEPXenxpWlWRwAaEQAKm0imG5Fm37JZi+5faXJv/ZLZGl r4TVg4u1kMktdTQRrTXa3Qs0i3wTtOZe1p3xCCzPx+97iYETHragDTdAFUO+v+Llin26L1Zl z4huyIqgGSuTuekQfn6eoMZbcF+wzah4j/mvXQVpJBF2qQi1YdHSapWDlweuiuk01y8C3eHv 3qfFB/OJwXhwj0HKhkGkB2dLXuLtIk4GCXh4/g22tWz/SB0gsSXU7WhJFb0CyxETGR9YKxM8 CNl5tVRLqsBC6yQLvcAJgJci73PfMiHKnjxrz//+0xQO1TPeruWsd8nLYvziT38CyX42Mbaj 01WpvB0qOeTGtwGFmyyrnE8fYpd3CE0uAl9BnHqafAabl9+09x3wf+lEkkO2bK59akZz3BPU 8Lz2BAgskyS81WZCthQYUrUozFEx/31x8JJ95EQFNW9t8HBa51r4QhedSNKxLbT3Sx8hH0iq Z8wYkGw0og9U1DqgFzxE2HSGZSDG3I1DrPDqhcM/6Y0V98wS+XreuS88DYYck37+L7bTGiyZ WYFNZk1ChcIBk8hgKn5nFOCWO2rX06RI9zorzSpEg6lB2STae1Up5oEj8QqfYmfO3cp2Qhvj F3c2/i8KpWkJQkAgNrv428FIlx9SiPu9gvNTTYuLIOdZLQvInTmKs2uCoB6JDAW75axDhBbR FvM3Vpv/ Message-ID: <7bc8e607-effb-2aa6-cb70-4e15ac504d55@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:49:39 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: ru Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Bdfw3Ctzz4rmQ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Q42bmuex; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of alexvpetrov@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::136 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alexvpetrov@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.61), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.50), asn: 15169(-1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:49:46 -0000 mkdir -p '.deps/' config/external/rlbox/rlbox_thread_locals.o /usr/local/bin/clang++90 -std=gnu++17 -o rlbox_thread_locals.o -c -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/stl_wrappers -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers -include /usr/ports/www/firefo x/work/firefox-73.0/config/gcc_hidden.h -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -DNDEBUG=1 -DTRIMMED=1 -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -DMOZ_HAS_MOZGLUE -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DIMPL_LIBXUL -I /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/external/rlbox -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/config/external/rlbox -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local /include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/include/nss -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -fPIC -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include /usr/ports /www/firefox/work/.build/mozilla-config.h -Qunused-arguments -DLIBICONV_PLUG -isystem /usr/local/include -Qunused-arguments -Wall -Wbitfield-enum-conversion -Wempty-body -Wignored-qualifiers -Woverloaded-virtua l -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow-field-in-constructor-modified -Wsign-compare -Wtype-limits -Wunreachable-code -Wunreachable-code-return -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wclass-varargs -Wempty-init-stmt -Wfloat -overflow-conversion -Wfloat-zero-conversion -Wloop-analysis -Wc++2a-compat -Wcomma -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wstring-conversion -Wtautological-overlap-compare -Wtautological-unsigned-enum-zero-compare -Wtautolog ical-unsigned-zero-compare -Wno-error=tautological-type-limit-compare -Wno-inline-new-delete -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations -Wno-error=array-bounds -Wno-error=backend-plugin -Wno-error=return-std-move -Wno- error=atomic-alignment -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-gnu-zero-variadic-macro-arguments -Wno-unknown-warning-option -Wno-return-type-c-linkage -fno-sized-deallocation -fno-aligned-new -O2 -pipe -O3 -DLIBICONV_ PLUG -fstack-protector-strong -isystem /usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -DLIBICONV_PLUG -isystem /usr/local/include -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno -exceptions -fno-math-errno -pipe -I/usr/local/include -O2 -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -MD -MP -MF .deps/rlbox_thread_locals.o.pp /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/external/rlbo x/rlbox_thread_locals.cpp In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/external/rlbox/rlbox_thread_locals.cpp:10: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/include/mozilla/rlbox/rlbox_noop_sandbox.hpp:4: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/stl_wrappers/cstdlib:44: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers/cstdlib:3: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/cstdlib:85: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers/stdlib.h:3: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/stdlib.h:100: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers/math.h:3: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/math.h:311: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/stl_wrappers/type_traits:50: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/include/mozilla/mozalloc.h:31: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/stl_wrappers/new:44: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers/new:3: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/new:90: In file included from /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers/exception:3: /usr/include/c++/v1/exception:180:5: error: no member named 'abort' in namespace 'std::__1'; did you mean simply 'abort'? _VSTD::abort(); ^~~~~~~ /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:759:15: note: expanded from macro '_VSTD' #define _VSTD std::_LIBCPP_ABI_NAMESPACE ^ /usr/include/stdlib.h:86:17: note: 'abort' declared here _Noreturn void abort(void); ^ 1 error generated. gmake[5]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/rules.mk:738: rlbox_thread_locals.o] Error 1 gmake[5]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/config/external/rlbox' gmake[4]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/recurse.mk:74: config/external/rlbox/target-objects] Error 2 gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' gmake[3]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/recurse.mk:34: compile] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' gmake[2]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/rules.mk:394: all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/firefox ===>>> make build failed for www/firefox ===>>> Aborting update -- ----- Alex. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 08:59:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F96240A66 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Bdt71jLHz4sYJ for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate1.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id 0148xJEP034255 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:59:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.29.44.222] ([217.29.44.222]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id 0148xIs9090232 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:59:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) From: "Patrick M. Hausen" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Kibana7 port status? Message-Id: <3B669A08-0B3C-4A04-9DF0-DA9B0C60C9AA@punkt.de> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:59:03 +0100 To: FreeBSD Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Bdt71jLHz4sYJ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hausen@punkt.de designates 217.29.33.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hausen@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.11 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.29.32.0/20]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.33)[ip: (-0.31), ipnet: 217.29.32.0/20(-0.74), asn: 16188(-0.58), country: DE(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:59:28 -0000 Hi all, is there a particular reason why the Logstash7 and Elasticsearch7 ports were committed to the ports tree, but Kibana7 wasn't? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237374 Kind regards, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de info@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian = Stein From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 09:29:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B38241395 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BfXV0SGPz4tpY for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1iyuVy-000AMX-H8; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 10:29:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:29:02 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Kibana7 port status? Message-ID: <20200204092902.GC37073@home.opsec.eu> References: <3B669A08-0B3C-4A04-9DF0-DA9B0C60C9AA@punkt.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B669A08-0B3C-4A04-9DF0-DA9B0C60C9AA@punkt.de> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BfXV0SGPz4tpY X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.90 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.91)[-0.914,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:29:14 -0000 Hi! > is there a particular reason why the Logstash7 and > Elasticsearch7 ports were committed to the ports tree, > but Kibana7 wasn't? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237374 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237372#c30 from 24th of January says: ------------- I don't see that we have a port of kibana7 yet. I don't know if anyone is working on that. I found that it seemed to insist on having node 10.15.2 to run, which was a problem since the FreeBSD port is at 10.17.0. ------------- Any ideas on that ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 11:38:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6E1243A07 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:38:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout002aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BjQ56bTbz3Jfl for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id ywXVicySSWok8ywXViRJQV; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:38:46 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Bq/jPrf5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=DBwwDor5xuMA:10 a=uN8d6AXhAAAA:8 a=zWePr8ydI-RjJIhe2oIA:9 a=_j3w6r29ksaJZgzo:21 a=myeUoj7i2XVwbjTp:21 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJHzsikX2quB7EnxZjD01bB7BjAlxmCHVH2dtm5hLNO7xbTBj7AG9JLbokpnm1J7KSofDFYEy2YunO66jcPYqczXAHodOV1ihdl8RUNxo+w8gQWF87wP ZqBqAxQUynyvUM4dpx5ieRUQpvnBAoEVLlev5z0l67/lMSDCHKWNTTxp X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BjQ56bTbz3Jfl X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[163.177.28.96.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; MISSING_DATE(1.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.11)[0.113,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.992,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 47.43.24.0/21(-0.48), asn: 40294(0.83), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:38:54 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:38:54 -0000 > This is quite surprising as I have not seen this. I do get occasional dead > buttons due to all of the privacy add-ons I run, especially No-Script, but > also less intrusive ones like Privacy Badger. > I have seen a few issues with sites taking advantage of some JS functions > outside of the standard that Chrome has added and Firefox has not yet > picked up. This is the fault of Chrome playing the old IE game of making > other browsers notwork correctly on some pages. I also have to fake the UI > identifier for some sites as they reject access from FreeBSD (Chase Bank, > I'm looking at you!) or do the wrong thing. > As regards chromium, I have deleted it it and will not consider ever using > it due to it's massive data collection and its blocking privacy tools like > No-Script. > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer I know from experience what you mean with Chase Bank blocking online banking access if your user-agent string is not to the website server's liking. Chase Bank is not the only offender. Some websites, without blocking access, behave differently and wrongly depending on user-agent string. I got Chase Bank to work with an outdated version of Otter Browser and a fudged user agent. Sometimes it's not what browser you're using, but what browser the website software thinks you're using. I do find some scripts to cause problems and make some websites very slow. I had problems with Mozilla SeaMonkey on nfl.com when I was looking to see highlights on the last Super Bowl (last Sunday night). I was glad to close that browser window! Since this problem with Chase, using Mozilla Seamonkey under FreeBSD, affects me so directly, I could not resist making this response. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 12:13:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0795244C41 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BkB817Ccz3LXX for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 24D13244C40; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2448E244C3E; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (107-204-234-170.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BkB70bLYz3LXT; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 014CDWcf027608; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:32 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 014CDWPe027607; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 04:13:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 04:13:32 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: "Alex V. Petrov" Cc: gecko@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: firefox-73.0,1 error build Message-ID: <20200204121332.GU1309@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <7bc8e607-effb-2aa6-cb70-4e15ac504d55@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l/3WCmqZNZ+BnHMk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7bc8e607-effb-2aa6-cb70-4e15ac504d55@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BkB70bLYz3LXT X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.95 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-2.55)[ip: (-9.65), ipnet: 107.192.0.0/12(-4.83), asn: 7018(1.77), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:13:36 -0000 --l/3WCmqZNZ+BnHMk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 03:49:39PM +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > ... > In file included from > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers/exception:3: >=20 >=20 > /usr/include/c++/v1/exception:180:5: error: no member named 'abort' in > namespace 'std::__1'; did you mean simply 'abort'? > _VSTD::abort(); > ^~~~~~~ > /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:759:15: note: expanded from macro '_VSTD' >=20 > #define _VSTD std::_LIBCPP_ABI_NAMESPACE >=20 > ^ > /usr/include/stdlib.h:86:17: note: 'abort' declared here >=20 > _Noreturn void abort(void); > ^ > 1 error generated. > gmake[5]: *** > [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-73.0/config/rules.mk:738: > rlbox_thread_locals.o] Error 1 > .... This is being tracked in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243863 Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "The Senate has abdicated its constitutional duty during the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump." -- Alan S. Frumin, parliamentarian emeritus of the US Senate See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --l/3WCmqZNZ+BnHMk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl45X+xfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PckQPggApbzVz4HAUQpAztCs5aYP0/X8ih39jd2OhmVKkDVma6Ysm/9XVgzA4e7F H5G7U93UjyeKQgZzOjy4WHZUEhHGNDsamTgyv11DOxGgXsiHI3u1n2wEpeytR4R1 XfIFlZaKXDYIV+H27WX30iy21yZPXizQTrp3ao/HYd8R0Ymk+zKQMbb+DvWrhZDm fZtfciicgQPZNLRIb9OfwbQlEksoUyf1Ld8qtdG49GD/rZ68yQAFpHNJg6xO3/Nc N6gM64fjnfSfGy9B8GtEuLTv+/vViVpV8CxcDZHQUaeZD6KjPBPbX57qnjf4hlt1 kG6HU/CKAXSuwxWSGK1V01MgZiy84Q== =SS4D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l/3WCmqZNZ+BnHMk-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 20:13:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CD1232D17 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BwrM6rY9z4VFM for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 014KDslQ040543 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:13:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 014KDs8U040542 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:13:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:13:54 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: ports list Subject: Why are there 1981 p5-* subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel? Message-ID: <20200204201354.GC39757@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BwrM6rY9z4VFM X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.54 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.41)[ip: (0.23), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.11), asn: 7018(1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.94)[0.935,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.997,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 20:13:56 -0000 I find the number of perl subdirectores in the /usr/ports/devel directory pretty annoying to navigate. Is there a reason there needs to be 1981 of them? Couldn't there be a better way to organize all of the perl ports so that they don't clutter up the devel directory so much? Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 20:18:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3A232EA3 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BwxQ4qLVz4VNy for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1iz4eD-000DTh-F7; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 21:18:13 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 21:18:13 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Bob Willcox Cc: ports list Subject: Re: Why are there 1981 p5-* subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel? Message-ID: <20200204201813.GD37073@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200204201354.GC39757@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200204201354.GC39757@rancor.immure.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48BwxQ4qLVz4VNy X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.71 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.75)[-0.746,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 20:18:19 -0000 Hi! > I find the number of perl subdirectores in the /usr/ports/devel > directory pretty annoying to navigate. > Is there a reason there needs to be 1981 of them? There are approx. 1300 python ports in devel and approx. 1100 ruby ports. > Couldn't there be a better > way to organize all of the perl ports so that they don't clutter > up the devel directory so much? Up to now we had no time to implent a different solution. It's no easy task, therefore it will take quite some investment in development time to fix this. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 20:48:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF32D233FB7 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Bxch27Dkz4XWK for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 014Kmocn040640 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:48:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 014Kmo9U040639 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:48:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:48:50 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: ports list Subject: pkg install no longer works on my newly installed system Message-ID: <20200204204850.GD39757@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Bxch27Dkz4XWK X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.28 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.69)[0.695,0]; IP_SCORE(0.41)[ip: (0.23), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.11), asn: 7018(1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.98)[0.981,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 20:48:52 -0000 On a newly installed 12.1 stable system for some reason I am now getting this error whenever I attempt to install any package via 'pkg install': root@jar-jar:1 /.amd_mnt/vader/host/stor/home/bob> pkg install ctags Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: ctags: 5.8 Number of packages to be installed: 1 125 KiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/1] Fetching ctags-5.8.txz: 100% 125 KiB 128.3kB/s 00:01 pkg: cached package ctags-5.8: size mismatch, fetching from remote Fetching ctags-5.8.txz: 100% 125 KiB 128.3kB/s 00:01 pkg: cached package ctags-5.8: size mismatch, cannot continue Previously I was able to install some packages on this system. I did update the system via downloading the src and building/installing world and a new kernel. Anyone have any idea what is wrong with my system now and how to fix it? Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 4 21:03:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE65123466C for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 21:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Bxxb0XnNz4YSF for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 21:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 014L3TMI040698 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:03:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 014L3TLY040697 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:03:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:03:29 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: ports list Subject: Re: pkg install no longer works on my newly installed system Message-ID: <20200204210329.GE39757@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200204204850.GD39757@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200204204850.GD39757@rancor.immure.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Bxxb0XnNz4YSF X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.69)[0.691,0]; IP_SCORE(0.40)[ip: (0.22), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.10), asn: 7018(1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.993,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 21:03:31 -0000 On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 02:48:50PM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote: > On a newly installed 12.1 stable system for some reason I am now getting this error > whenever I attempt to install any package via 'pkg install': > > root@jar-jar:1 /.amd_mnt/vader/host/stor/home/bob> pkg install ctags > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up to date. > All repositories are up to date. > The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > ctags: 5.8 > > Number of packages to be installed: 1 > > 125 KiB to be downloaded. > > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > [1/1] Fetching ctags-5.8.txz: 100% 125 KiB 128.3kB/s 00:01 > pkg: cached package ctags-5.8: size mismatch, fetching from remote > Fetching ctags-5.8.txz: 100% 125 KiB 128.3kB/s 00:01 > pkg: cached package ctags-5.8: size mismatch, cannot continue > > Previously I was able to install some packages on this system. I did update the > system via downloading the src and building/installing world and a new kernel. > > Anyone have any idea what is wrong with my system now and how to fix it? > > Thanks, > Bob I removed the repo-FreeBSD.sqlite in /var/db/pkg and tried doing a pkg install again and it downloaded/updated all the files in /var/db/pkg and then successfully downloaded and installed the ctags package. So it seems that something was not right with the files in there before (even though previously it worked). Bob > > -- > Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to > bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. > Austin, TX | > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 03:24:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8858323E0B2 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 03:24:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C6Nm15jrz40bS for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 03:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a142so546665oii.7 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:24:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=x5YQ/7USq0xWs83QAGomGcwD8fx3Fx34iXhF3L/aNlw=; b=uCn4dQzyq9nmyWC2CjTu4P5J98JML7CJaRq6Aat5BU5TTpAWD+O/IIVzvICC5gFVf/ 7YkCOatV4X4Zf8xvRL/74B7qVZ1lERhoPeMW49pFsjvMleSQsnPkmVbXB4oau8ewoZL5 pfg5T90wKGQJVqbqIKo/u6pScROfsaDUlU4lsWJt+g6H0YjI9RvIO4WHcGgnPCKklqKy 45pHdiMxO56SY8e4GJ4F41Ji48JIpdHMXlKnnoFtwAu2HXHTzcqfENwC1A04ErjoUcQa f8oe3jr5wESUAz0wmo5A0TRD9qD72D56lrlQ8z/+AUOlXGeZf79FC7W5ee2M4KOuYwcy DSgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x5YQ/7USq0xWs83QAGomGcwD8fx3Fx34iXhF3L/aNlw=; b=KC27tw/kkVr7niIq7ZC4vrU/O0ghUx8SF32TFmLqepXBU4g0rKETIDIXxTw0hD4pTI gxQl7Iz/OB010EwWgj5tC1tpc+FkzAN/kWlFCZYD+fn596L+pFo2rfRvP+BU8PviiP+c mEuJ1fJtpuaVIRDnKB2TDFW7u8vrTi8gXa3kOtk4RjiUoM8Qe+KWa/RSIlqnt4sSeDMu TsMzVbQ8TbCrWe5/XmY/FgA70MmC8TOV4LaXe1jZX3glU4aBRV7SXtV8PNZxlWyBuEdi acftWkeEWw/HBzdV8YJMINHdktu5y88QwJxp66y30bya5OZYfX9SCSTimjEJS62hmFwp gveA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVrOZdxXe/BWvTWDT1tRS+dI/qY+CsAC6rEs23d+TJOOCReibYG hasz2lYhwTkKYj3KX45VX5LCC9DQLKd5bXFFskM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzOuLcrKBsEhCcj0zcuEsH9kBADDF32yEVfvPY0fRS1IIHFaovCEIhD/3efIzSW3FOcTUdQDvJP63o3jnpKpBc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1708:: with SMTP id j8mr1555681oii.166.1580873046833; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:24:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:23:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: xterm-353 To: Thomas Mueller Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48C6Nm15jrz40bS X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=uCn4dQzy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[twc.com]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-8.60), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.98), asn: 15169(-1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 03:24:09 -0000 On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:39 AM Thomas Mueller wrote: > > This is quite surprising as I have not seen this. I do get occasional > dead > > buttons due to all of the privacy add-ons I run, especially No-Script, > but > > also less intrusive ones like Privacy Badger. > > > I have seen a few issues with sites taking advantage of some JS functions > > outside of the standard that Chrome has added and Firefox has not yet > > picked up. This is the fault of Chrome playing the old IE game of making > > other browsers notwork correctly on some pages. I also have to fake the > UI > > identifier for some sites as they reject access from FreeBSD (Chase Bank, > > I'm looking at you!) or do the wrong thing. > > > As regards chromium, I have deleted it it and will not consider ever > using > > it due to it's massive data collection and its blocking privacy tools > like > > No-Script. > > > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > > I know from experience what you mean with Chase Bank blocking online > banking access if your user-agent string is not to the website server's > liking. > > Chase Bank is not the only offender. Some websites, without blocking > access, behave differently and wrongly depending on user-agent string. > > I got Chase Bank to work with an outdated version of Otter Browser and a > fudged user agent. > > Sometimes it's not what browser you're using, but what browser the website > software thinks you're using. > > I do find some scripts to cause problems and make some websites very slow. > > I had problems with Mozilla SeaMonkey on nfl.com when I was looking to > see highlights on the last Super Bowl (last Sunday night). > > I was glad to close that browser window! > > Since this problem with Chase, using Mozilla Seamonkey under FreeBSD, > affects me so directly, I could not resist making this response. > > Tom > This is getting a bit off-topic, but I use Firefox with User Agent Switcher by Linder. (There are several Firefox extensions that have VERY similar names.) It works perfectly at Chase and also fixes several sites that insist on providing the mobile version to FreeBSD. It allows the selection of both OS and browser to provide in the user agent ID on a per-site basis. It fixes a lot of issues. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 03:32:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3739D23E632 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 03:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com (mail-lf1-f45.google.com [209.85.167.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C6ZM1W3Pz41H4 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 03:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id z26so371452lfg.13 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:32:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MuFX3745T7PmiK1UENtB23BYtXG5qB3OYYcwxLp0wD4=; b=JrWKM0kGlkEt8YukVYQOXkTr92cVLTNbmuG/9NpgTFqJmn2bZJL6JaeBzDLdpdnFnc 00ptuBPmU/7cpN9/nDUY0PrZPwWbr6ezQl6fCbls6IF1O8cC/TUZrQh7VtE5oKAcEAwE Ul69YFpSpkMdR6Mgyvidvc7ViKbicWhTkQm5O7jUUBzmdzb8lM/WQ5WJYN4F56QfO6Xi LGutFwQVYBUZZFdRwjcGNCcy9/rOi2JeRXLgJ1z/D24nabhJuCUMYV3MCGecQIyEYf9A OGQDr/0Yz8RVlnrGdHw1h/vSkeGfdMzkL0zcR39OZosgq0zjFxVbPRNIvGMP83H16Pw+ xkQA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWtp4Hw459B5uUol2nU5GuOiblOORMYAqhUvr0OvUSwsoYuJ6ld 8N1mg9jOGrXK0kLQd2z33s8kGLsY5VM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJHwNeOmJCrh5F/UUscdZgQIjrW4qRTiIKp2QJHcwL6KY5CGLjwvlGrwWyjZxFDc4sRz8mBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:7c:: with SMTP id i28mr16750843lfo.131.1580873545324; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com. [209.85.167.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m83sm11523253lfa.5.2020.02.04.19.32.25 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id z18so410581lfe.2 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:32:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4849:: with SMTP id 9mr16458409lfy.11.1580873544922; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:32:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200204204850.GD39757@rancor.immure.com> In-Reply-To: <20200204204850.GD39757@rancor.immure.com> From: Gleb Popov Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 07:31:59 +0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg install no longer works on my newly installed system To: Bob Willcox Cc: ports list X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48C6ZM1W3Pz41H4 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 6yearold@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=6yearold@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[45.167.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.06)[ip: (-0.48), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.03), asn: 15169(-1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[arrowd@freebsd.org,6yearold@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[45.167.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[arrowd@freebsd.org,6yearold@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 03:32:28 -0000 On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 12:48 AM Bob Willcox wrote: > On a newly installed 12.1 stable system for some reason I am now getting > this error > whenever I attempt to install any package via 'pkg install': > > root@jar-jar:1 /.amd_mnt/vader/host/stor/home/bob> pkg install ctags > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up to date. > All repositories are up to date. > The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > ctags: 5.8 > > Number of packages to be installed: 1 > > 125 KiB to be downloaded. > > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > [1/1] Fetching ctags-5.8.txz: 100% 125 KiB 128.3kB/s 00:01 > pkg: cached package ctags-5.8: size mismatch, fetching from remote > Fetching ctags-5.8.txz: 100% 125 KiB 128.3kB/s 00:01 > pkg: cached package ctags-5.8: size mismatch, cannot continue > > Previously I was able to install some packages on this system. I did > update the > system via downloading the src and building/installing world and a new > kernel. > > Anyone have any idea what is wrong with my system now and how to fix it? > > Thanks, > Bob > I wonder if https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/1807 is related. > -- > Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to > bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. > Austin, TX | > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 05:48:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F25240DEA for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 05:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout001aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C9bY56lTz47X5 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 05:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id zDYAindxp9GgizDYAi76ob; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 05:48:34 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Cb52G4jl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=DBwwDor5xuMA:10 a=_Lq-eW3REgOglABciQwA:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=iN5T7XU8j8v39cji:21 a=9_QIgAykaHZB9E35:21 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOjbSx5EDoW6jgErp072lYvV3QG1jZKGMt30O+am7d+E9TrmgbyC8mXPoGx7xN6+D9noHAMgBpUXmtEE6US2bQZUAMGTsywz9LtBnMVCZPmxNpzmptCl vcFnOeXiHFlBtVSSQPU6DwEVg0XVVKdrDD1/InsueNHD63NwE49iAIjL X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48C9bY56lTz47X5 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.132 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[163.177.28.96.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; MISSING_DATE(1.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.11)[0.105,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.992,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 47.43.24.0/21(-0.45), asn: 40294(0.82), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 05:48:42 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 05:48:42 -0000 > This is getting a bit off-topic, but I use Firefox with User Agent Switcher > by Linder. (There are several Firefox extensions that have VERY similar > names.) It works perfectly at Chase and also fixes several sites that > insist on providing the mobile version to FreeBSD. It allows the selection > of both OS and browser to provide in the user agent ID on a per-site basis. > It fixes a lot of issues. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer Where would I find User Agent Switcher by Linder? Would it be on a Mozilla site, and would it work with SeaMonkey? Would the several Firefox or SeaMonkey extensions have similar functionality? Better to reply to list only; copy that was sent to me off-list had the same Message-ID but was in multipart/alternative. Maybe the list software sanitized the message format? Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 07:00:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D92924230F for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 07:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CCBB6cnHz4BHc for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 07:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id a142so939123oii.7 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:00:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=paNqLkzsvzfrCThiizsoIX3MDqof+YObYQDGXNTtEnc=; b=XB03SqTXklxbeQGJLO+NP6Ank9vtKkKmHfR351dM7lujpn9mjujWWa+3OoRp+jHjP7 oBuUjmjbEr7h5scKfxaiwRduSEdYBSnY7KQmx6lHRfQSqT6JBPeZuMdMQVvhoh0j4AVT kjo1eJHswqyO3nWrh73hYq4wacrY+0b9YYBBgYcY5R1ASOoQnlwra3G7SoY5vb5ZsFcE xjQ1Ocz74+QekrEg0L5aWZMf07mH1Ds0pVX+IRuXaufscVXS9tP+EJx3fxlRz6fVfjUf V/sZaV9t9KzNbwHHfKxaXb+S29q9pdSd/xEVIaRXY/i8cM0UBQFMdYkqhC2LkOW3m0Jd pPuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=paNqLkzsvzfrCThiizsoIX3MDqof+YObYQDGXNTtEnc=; b=oaKiBat5LYesDDUc0KAPjYShEJsoIAeAgNp+QLAdXea6yTWO9IU5Scus+28CdHm8kS u/lDuWWpRWMhCTN1z9F/45uPh+1aQWTuVsMnIPTOyQ5GNXE+U089USSqj8Afp5I7yGiw Daj2aG25jr1I6lQjl701Zg+Y/o0KKT6U1wA+V37iGfI3+deD594SbnKiC8/IIZ9hRNGM Auwo38yQ7YtrvBKzqJKzypAt9hjQIiZ8Spcliyb9sdQCZrUQPh/yrPh0QO7yvTyCf6qZ +7zF/PV2EO7LRdTOweuJDcAtHvF8DRQuEvCb4LFuinkFYPKyW7bas7XWem84c58e+t8j oXEg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVWNp53JJvlKS0Mdt57FQ8Brd8OYla7cOZeWiAAVK9L11ObYNeJ lN2skA3cJg2EcxKFkn5EiYNZfTJ070okz1NrT9pq2esFhdo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZTkWVOqXpQ4v08QvgeVgm+WvfO/34VM7Lpb05PK/uMe1/V8Bb567QYdUj+7yrydNqwgWVwHyBPGl9gM9DQ18= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4e8d:: with SMTP id c13mr1925172oiy.27.1580886016669; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:00:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <5e3a5742.1c69fb81.21fce.7f8bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5e3a5742.1c69fb81.21fce.7f8bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 23:00:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: xterm-353 To: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48CCBB6cnHz4BHc X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XB03SqTX; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-8.00), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.98), asn: 15169(-1.75), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 07:00:20 -0000 On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:48 PM Thomas Mueller wrote: > > This is getting a bit off-topic, but I use Firefox with User Agent > Switcher > > by Linder. (There are several Firefox extensions that have VERY similar > > names.) It works perfectly at Chase and also fixes several sites that > > insist on providing the mobile version to FreeBSD. It allows the > selection > > of both OS and browser to provide in the user agent ID on a per-site > basis. > > It fixes a lot of issues. > > -- > > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > > Where would I find User Agent Switcher by Linder? Would it be on a > Mozilla site, and would it work with SeaMonkey? > > Would the several Firefox or SeaMonkey extensions have similar > functionality? > > Better to reply to list only; copy that was sent to me off-list had the > same Message-ID but was in multipart/alternative. Maybe the list software > sanitized the message format? > > Tom > It's available through Firefox from about:addons. It is the one by Linder, one of at eat three extensions of the same name. I don't know about SeaMonkey. Does it support the extension interface like Firefox? If so, it will probably work. You might also check the website at http://mybrowseraddon.com/useragent-switcher.html -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 12:59:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06F924A278 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CM856g3pz4WHB for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1580907541; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=+cjIz9TPfCB4jqHX788tioqg+CE=; b=LJAMenPRUhXS46MFVXWXRR6oGTJo6lBNGRIr7pn+Od2w4tggZSiVR2oxR1kw1hbF rLl5PzoE9kedvopde9sG8zSQrNRyCV6Rbzka3gEthnqzyIXphOEsMdbSf8OG2Y7c wjFOPJ0K/0868gIJqrQN+OHQ9spuLMKKmOFY8n1ugG9KIB5sbvumQmDuFnPPAJS9 XLyxdaFG1Ssua6FD8fus30g0/HaOAos2teRWRFnvnrpiwGPuVdKndNy0jqEF5V25 MRc+lN96Gx5CW5Igq3CdrniM5QBaxAmVfYEpA+RL/g2MtsYfCVc5SYWZaEmRf9ej HQYaQ0DkyaSoneSJ2AWkyA==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Z/aS40ZA c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:117 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=XRQyMpdBKAEA:10 a=l697ptgUJYAA:10 a=48faUk6PgeAA:10 a=7Z-5TkyvAAAA:8 a=CPkyRbc-fZ4U97cBYwcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=WcoL0p9OcOQA:10 a=zX-9W-ELAj7UF4fcnrjh:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [209.6.230.48] ([209.6.230.48:57060] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 35/06-09594-41CBA3E5; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 07:59:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24122.48147.604996.197757@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 07:58:59 -0500 From: Robert Huff To: Kevin Oberman Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: xterm-353 In-Reply-To: References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <5e3a5742.1c69fb81.21fce.7f8bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48CM856g3pz4WHB X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=LJAMenPR; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-1.47)[ip: (-9.28), ipnet: 69.168.97.0/24(1.10), asn: 36271(0.90), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.97.168.69.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:59:02 -0000 Kevin Oberman writes: > > Where would I find User Agent Switcher by Linder? Would it be on a > > Mozilla site, and would it work with SeaMonkey? > > > > Would the several Firefox or SeaMonkey extensions have similar > > functionality? > > It's available through Firefox from about:addons. It is the one by Linder, > one of at eat three extensions of the same name. I don't know about > SeaMonkey. Does it support the extension interface like Firefox? If so, it > will probably work. You might also check the website at > http://mybrowseraddon.com/useragent-switcher.html Seamonkey - which was my default browser until it was no longer updated - came with this ability built in. The only problem was the list of alternate identities was vintage, like, 2000 with no way (that I knew of) to change it. Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 16:57:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E10224EFE6 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troubledaemon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CSRj4pnDz3Grg for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troubledaemon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id g6so1415859qvy.5 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:57:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lOHF6WskpDYh/uR/xE8OMgHZxYtbjk8krJjMYbQDA68=; b=WJfPEuBcIfqu/j2p43f4jS/WWdHZgHDzcwTqgeULhnBo5rFEzFhxEenKNtoPoddle3 Q9V/17gsNSphrRRG1dVEopfgATuasC63XW17KjD7cUBCqLK4nVtGU5nC1a/bDa2dhum5 6wxM/bHlsHwVyJA/GP+Ykt9ueLYxUvSFdHb0IsVCoZ29KHQ1tOGg3xheY/KV8p1hzhHG /1NxZUi6oY3+cgwJURDqoxyzexcr6rE2nn2OW8fYXLrU8d3IHk80MNr83VbdzlN7Tpu1 1aWk5ILCeq8Cq8SpQGXNAnXgetoasLiUXsj5Q95jK//efEWgUZV+EaDf3DjlhJDsL1+h l8og== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lOHF6WskpDYh/uR/xE8OMgHZxYtbjk8krJjMYbQDA68=; b=U+kZBLLjkGbauHl9L1bhXFyVjcqmOLNCca70mC09L54xkWNjehYBMoVg3CwcJ5VG+w DEAP4uQRj7fz9Obgf5vwnQXLbZWhoZb733deoVTjvXDYvd9vbM1Qh7rF804BMbNz5nJK 1r90HM3BZs9zCeCrzubgrfQuiO7Pp35mIImT522wImfxOHNLwGtlNl2G2QTWUiQcD4J1 088YE6aanYEnWf2MQW8aALezhBRpNALG2L7MgOIGEUnoUeHg0Sy0W3FCcgBP5oxDCoRf uhKX5wBXp8CtIX8tc/adv+d2fB0nWk0jF372DDJ/YKvHru2cRJkkY3q28uAKJY4NZyCZ wUyA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAURNu/LZCkpv+12qLOWCCucGZoq5tjFxbX2Yr2RFUHrHnFa/R7N xv7Ll4vejMRms8aTXfMj1kCWF/8gr6XGvT4MJZC4BqwC X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwh+hRq2fk2QTgHIlbTD9oRWTtvOFefjd4yYo0CwB5b6bxxK8LthAd11o3BmTuwmTQNb8lUJ/Pqq6yvV8e80sE= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a910:: with SMTP id y16mr33287628qva.139.1580921866906; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:57:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dan McGrath Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:57:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: security/openssl: 1.1.1d in 2020Q1 still vulnerable? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48CSRj4pnDz3Grg X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WJfPEuBc; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of troubledaemon@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=troubledaemon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[danmcgrathca@gmail.com,troubledaemon@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[danmcgrathca@gmail.com,troubledaemon@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-6.36), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.98), asn: 15169(-1.74), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:57:54 -0000 Hi, Was just noticing that the 2020Q1 port for OpenSSL was still showing up with 11 different CVE's, yet I noticed that the commit [1] in r511808 says it fixed 9e0c6f7a-d46d-11e9-a1c7-b499baebfeaf, yet it still shows up in pkg audit for CVE-2019-1549 and CVE-2019-1547. Any idea what the story is here? [1] - https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=511808 Thanks, Danny McGrath From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 19:42:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C171D22BF98 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CX5r442Gz43MD for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:42:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1izQb3-00064O-Vv for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:44:25 -0700 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:44:25 -0700 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: [jesler@cisco.com: [Clamav-announce] ClamAV?? blog: ClamAV 0.102.2 security patch released] Message-ID: <20200205194425.GA20596@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48CX5r442Gz43MD X-Spamd-Bar: ++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.09)[-0.089,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; URIBL_PBL(0.02)[empire.kred]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.73)[0.728,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.17)[ip: (-0.41), ipnet: 204.209.81.0/24(-0.20), asn: 6171(-0.16), country: CA(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 19:42:41 -0000 Heads up security/clamav team. ----- Forwarded message from "Joel Esler (jesler)" ----- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:29:00 +0000 From: "Joel Esler (jesler)" To: "clamav-announce@lists.clamav.net" , "clamav-users@lists.clamav.net" , "clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net" Subject: [Clamav-announce] ClamAV?? blog: ClamAV 0.102.2 security patch released x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) https://blog.clamav.net/2020/02/clamav-01022-security-patch-released.html Today, we're publishing 0.102.2. Navigate to ClamAV's downloads page to download the release materials. 0.102.2 ClamAV 0.102.2 is a security patch release to address the following issues. * CVE-2020-3123: A denial-of-service (DoS) condition may occur when using the optional credit card data-loss-prevention (DLP) feature. Improper bounds checking of an unsigned variable resulted in an out-of-bounds read, which causes a crash. * Significantly improved the scan speed of PDF files on Windows. * Re-applied a fix to alleviate file access issues when scanning RAR files in downstream projects that use libclamav where the scanning engine is operating in a low-privilege process. This bug was originally fixed in 0.101.2 and the fix was mistakenly omitted from 0.102.0. * Fixed an issue where freshclam failed to update if the database version downloaded is one version older than advertised. This situation may occur after a new database version is published. The issue affected users downloading the whole CVD database file. * Changed the default freshclam ReceiveTimeout setting to 0 (infinite). The ReceiveTimeout had caused needless database update failures for users with slower internet connections. * Correctly display the number of kilobytes (KiB) in progress bar and reduced the size of the progress bar to accommodate 80-character width terminals. * Fixed an issue where running freshclam manually causes a daemonized freshclam process to fail when it updates because the manual instance deletes the temporary download directory. The freshclam temporary files will now download to a unique directory created at the time of an update instead of using a hardcoded directory created/destroyed at the program start/exit. * Fix for freshclam's OnOutdatedExecute config option. * Fixes a memory leak in the error condition handling for the email parser. * Improved bound checking and error handling in ARJ archive parser. * Improved error handling in PDF parser. * Fix for memory leak in byte-compare signature handler. * Updates to the unit test suite to support libcheck 0.13. * Updates to support autoconf 2.69 and automake 1.15. Special thanks to the following people for code contributions and bug reports: * Antoine Desch??nes * Eric Lindblad * Gianluigi Tiesi * Tuomo Soini Please join us on the ClamAV mailing lists for further discussion. Thanks! _______________________________________________ clamav-announce mailing list clamav-announce@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-announce http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Sometimes it is the greediest giving things away. -unknown From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 19:48:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0913822C135 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com (mail-wm1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CXDr04M9z43XK for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:48:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id p9so3806847wmc.2 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 11:48:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lzT7egLVpEEJLwBiEU4QiKe1lxYDprurNbX2zNgHeLM=; b=SzYQWoZk5bpJVLiLD3dFJ2srnm9IEI0HQTVRW9QPTy/hdWhC8IkV6/Nkj46o2XCQqX 7eb7+k73yjA7zzMM2qHJj/aMlc67neW9Wj0OU8NNRRLZI4AHU9C720lsiBbO5OC+yiml ysVVEdKmF1A2O1tf4VRnNxB49hOZWd68DfX4ALpsrmT+3/Urs2MzCymSMYurfPgqZDmG J/st0QUPW05sO8hLcyb/EXpb7/0hzYYKyhdEMlebbkGnq2lLozVsISqdnEgcB5WYMZZI eLlHTliU82A9gWSnnHSYBHWq+Qe+v4eaNM8kA5VCImVF6Y9mmedAXTOYWa6/RiusvuQ0 HHHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lzT7egLVpEEJLwBiEU4QiKe1lxYDprurNbX2zNgHeLM=; b=s4GI8wdwmcIdWT6ihEsUfl4aGjJkqnUC+mWutVx0axuRExx79cZcl3eSNL+dEGgzPB h45oWCCVw+zTilvsFDcgiETC0wKyc4/yMJ/IMjE7fEVQdh5TwMJ30tQju059k2KEqWL4 l0bDoua+8yJFJ9KWLsxW3s8y3fitXe9/+QvGS+0OKosHo5IK9Ne24dXaDlGRPHd2CaB0 XjDnW6Hpj0jS+bevyPlRHz3jFlfWwsOHnQwHA9e01weMBA9dGD3bSrnZQ0YugwUY56vK cUT9seIvlQuGVgFMMt9IGzpAjX4bPTLtphfLW+7sPeRgyNV4eoH9xQJfviPCnsOPukAw BPJw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmdJU2TVGUzixEH6hBJ3JwGYyqEyPhXfvpl0fdVEcgpujTIHJ9 mk7FhCrcehmNnU8+E/F7FZ1QLDVXvO8TvBtbr52NkLx7I80= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTtzYtjPof4Nsh6iS2eBVv+Y9lUqP8nTwDXo7ZyJLr5b6zkPPDVMpSaJ5agbogL/qwh+fa9QWjje+uAVV/gFo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:295d:: with SMTP id n29mr7408986wmd.101.1580932122395; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 11:48:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200204201354.GC39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204201813.GD37073@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200204201813.GD37073@home.opsec.eu> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:48:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why are there 1981 p5-* subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel? To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: Bob Willcox , ports list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48CXDr04M9z43XK X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=SzYQWoZk; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::342 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.83 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.4.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-0.33)[ip: (2.64), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.49), asn: 15169(-1.74), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 19:48:45 -0000 On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > > > I find the number of perl subdirectores in the /usr/ports/devel > > directory pretty annoying to navigate. > > Is there a reason there needs to be 1981 of them? > > There are approx. 1300 python ports in devel and approx. 1100 ruby ports. > > > Couldn't there be a better > > way to organize all of the perl ports so that they don't clutter > > up the devel directory so much? > > Up to now we had no time to implent a different solution. > > It's no easy task, therefore it will take quite some investment > in development time to fix this. At one point, bapt did the legwork to support three-level port directories. Perhaps it's time to implement /usr/ports/devel/p5/. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 20:44:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000D822DC06 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (mailfilter.dawnsign.com [108.60.104.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailfilter.dawnsign.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CYTP5LWqz47VG for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from pegasus.dawnsign.com (webmail.dawnsign.com [192.168.101.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05F428D81 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:44:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pegasus.dawnsign.com (192.168.101.11) by pegasus.dawnsign.com (192.168.101.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:44:39 -0800 Received: from pegasus.dawnsign.com ([fe80::5c97:e593:5806:25c2]) by pegasus.dawnsign.com ([fe80::5c97:e593:5806:25c2%2]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.005; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:44:39 -0800 From: Doug Sampson To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: p5-Locale-Language? Thread-Topic: p5-Locale-Language? Thread-Index: AdXcZMU9Djg7PYnNRYioyCh1ZwfxRQ== Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 20:44:39 +0000 Message-ID: <8a12d0aeb775499c95ba5652b8cf739e@dawnsign.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.101.149] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48CYTP5LWqz47VG X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dougs@dawnsign.com designates 108.60.104.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dougs@dawnsign.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.42 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.955,0]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dawnsign.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[180.104.60.108.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.14.2]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33544, ipnet:108.60.104.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.03)[asn: 33544(0.21), country: US(-0.05)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:44:43 -0000 How do I go about requesting a new Perl port for the Locale::Language modul= e that was taken out of Perl 5.30? www/foswiki depends on that module and s= ome of its functions have not worked since I upgraded the wiki system to 5.= 30. Since I use ports exclusively, I do not wish to revert to cpan to insta= ll such modules. ~Doug From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 5 21:13:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240C522ED86 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CZ6P06VCz4B1w for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 03B3922ED84; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0375922ED83 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CZ6N5pSjz4B1v for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC56E8EEC for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 015LDGC8060729 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:16 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 015LDG1d060728 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:16 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 21:13:16 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202002052113.015LDG1d060728@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 21:13:17 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.sysutils --- sh: freebsd-version: not found make[5]: "/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/sysutils/etc_os-release/Makefile" line 18: warning: "freebsd-version -u" returned non-zero status --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/www/rubygem-rails60: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/rubygem-webpacker-rails60 Committers on the hook: bofh farrokhi gerald linimon sunpoet tcberner Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U databases/pymongo/Makefile U databases/pymongo/distinfo U databases/geoserver-mysql-plugin/Makefile U databases/geoserver-mysql-plugin/distinfo U databases/Makefile A databases/rubygem-globalid-rails60 A databases/rubygem-globalid-rails60/Makefile A databases/rubygem-globalid-rails60/distinfo A databases/rubygem-globalid-rails60/pkg-descr A databases/rubygem-activerecord60 A databases/rubygem-activerecord60/Makefile A databases/rubygem-activerecord60/distinfo A databases/rubygem-activerecord60/pkg-descr A databases/rubygem-activemodel60 A databases/rubygem-activemodel60/Makefile A databases/rubygem-activemodel60/distinfo A databases/rubygem-activemodel60/pkg-descr U databases/py-tiledb/Makefile U databases/py-tiledb/distinfo U databases/py-fakeredis/Makefile U databases/py-fakeredis/distinfo U databases/tiledb/Makefile U databases/tiledb/distinfo U net-mgmt/fastnetmon/Makefile U graphics/geoserver/Makefile U graphics/geoserver/distinfo U graphics/geoserver/pkg-plist U sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/Makefile U sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/distinfo U lang/gcc10-devel/Makefile U lang/gcc10-devel/distinfo U math/armadillo/Makefile U MOVED U www/rubygem-rails52/Makefile U www/rubygem-rails5/Makefile U www/rubygem-rails50/Makefile U www/Makefile A www/rubygem-responders-rails60 A www/rubygem-responders-rails60/Makefile A www/rubygem-responders-rails60/distinfo A www/rubygem-responders-rails60/pkg-descr A www/rubygem-railties60 A www/rubygem-railties60/Makefile A www/rubygem-railties60/distinfo A www/rubygem-railties60/pkg-descr A www/rubygem-rails60 A www/rubygem-rails60/Makefile A www/rubygem-rails60/distinfo A www/rubygem-rails60/pkg-descr A www/rubygem-actionpack60 A www/rubygem-actionpack60/Makefile A www/rubygem-actionpack60/distinfo A www/rubygem-actionpack60/pkg-descr A www/rubygem-actioncable60 A www/rubygem-actioncable60/Makefile A www/rubygem-actioncable60/distinfo A www/rubygem-actioncable60/pkg-descr U www/py-django-redis/Makefile U www/py-dj22-django-redis/Makefile D devel/rubygem-web-console-rails5 D devel/rubygem-web-console-rails50 D devel/rubygem-web-console-rails52 U devel/Makefile A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails52 A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails52/Makefile A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails52/distinfo A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails52/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails5 A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails5/Makefile A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails5/distinfo A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails5/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails50 A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails50/Makefile A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails50/distinfo A devel/rubygem-web-console3-rails50/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-web-console-rails60 A devel/rubygem-web-console-rails60/Makefile A devel/rubygem-web-console-rails60/distinfo A devel/rubygem-web-console-rails60/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-sprockets-rails-rails60 A devel/rubygem-sprockets-rails-rails60/Makefile A devel/rubygem-sprockets-rails-rails60/distinfo A devel/rubygem-sprockets-rails-rails60/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-jbuilder-rails60 A devel/rubygem-jbuilder-rails60/Makefile A devel/rubygem-jbuilder-rails60/distinfo A devel/rubygem-jbuilder-rails60/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-devise-rails60 A devel/rubygem-devise-rails60/Makefile A devel/rubygem-devise-rails60/distinfo A devel/rubygem-devise-rails60/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-activesupport60 A devel/rubygem-activesupport60/Makefile A devel/rubygem-activesupport60/distinfo A devel/rubygem-activesupport60/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-activejob60 A devel/rubygem-activejob60/Makefile A devel/rubygem-activejob60/distinfo A devel/rubygem-activejob60/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-actionview60 A devel/rubygem-actionview60/Makefile A devel/rubygem-actionview60/distinfo A devel/rubygem-actionview60/pkg-descr U devel/p5-Alien-Build/Makefile U devel/p5-Alien-Build/distinfo U devel/rubygem-msgpack/Makefile U devel/rubygem-msgpack/distinfo U devel/rubygem-lumberjack/Makefile U devel/rubygem-lumberjack/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-workmail/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-workmail/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-storagegateway/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-storagegateway/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ssm/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ssm/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-kafka/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-kafka/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-iot/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-iot/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ec2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ec2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-cloudfront/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-cloudfront/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-partitions/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-partitions/distinfo U devel/py-tabulator/Makefile U devel/py-tabulator/distinfo U devel/p5-Term-Choose-Util/Makefile U devel/p5-Term-Choose-Util/distinfo U devel/p5-Devel-PatchPerl/Makefile U devel/p5-Devel-PatchPerl/distinfo U textproc/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-sassc-rails-rails60 A textproc/rubygem-sassc-rails-rails60/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-sassc-rails-rails60/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-sassc-rails-rails60/pkg-descr A textproc/rubygem-sass-rails-rails60 A textproc/rubygem-sass-rails-rails60/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-sass-rails-rails60/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-sass-rails-rails60/pkg-descr A textproc/rubygem-rails-dom-testing-rails60 A textproc/rubygem-rails-dom-testing-rails60/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-rails-dom-testing-rails60/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-rails-dom-testing-rails60/pkg-descr A textproc/rubygem-actiontext60 A textproc/rubygem-actiontext60/Makefile A textproc/rubygem-actiontext60/distinfo A textproc/rubygem-actiontext60/pkg-descr U textproc/p5-JavaScript-Packer/Makefile U textproc/p5-JavaScript-Packer/distinfo U textproc/ansifilter/Makefile U textproc/ansifilter/distinfo U net/Makefile A net/rubygem-activestorage60 A net/rubygem-activestorage60/Makefile A net/rubygem-activestorage60/distinfo A net/rubygem-activestorage60/pkg-descr U net/rubygem-google-cloud-pubsub/Makefile U net/rubygem-google-cloud-pubsub/distinfo U net/rubygem-dogapi/Makefile U net/rubygem-dogapi/distinfo U net/arp-scan/Makefile U net/arp-scan/distinfo U mail/Makefile A mail/rubygem-actionmailer60 A mail/rubygem-actionmailer60/Makefile A mail/rubygem-actionmailer60/distinfo A mail/rubygem-actionmailer60/pkg-descr A mail/rubygem-actionmailbox60 A mail/rubygem-actionmailbox60/Makefile A mail/rubygem-actionmailbox60/distinfo A mail/rubygem-actionmailbox60/pkg-descr D biology/seaview/files U biology/seaview/Makefile U biology/seaview/distinfo U deskutils/Makefile A deskutils/kuserfeedback A deskutils/kuserfeedback/Makefile A deskutils/kuserfeedback/distinfo A deskutils/kuserfeedback/pkg-descr A deskutils/kuserfeedback/pkg-plist Updated to revision 525350. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 00:06:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B73232D3F for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Cdxm6wkDz4Lfc for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EDB39232D3E; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7C4232D3D for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Cdxm66cVz4LfY for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36C9AE68 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 016064cl022495 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 016064i4022493 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:06:04 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202002060006.016064i4022493@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:06:05 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 01:41:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DEA2361C7 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 01:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Ch3j5j8nz4RJ9 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 01:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: OpenSSL multiple names? Message-Id: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:41:19 -0700 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Ch3j5j8nz4RJ9 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.75 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.79)[-0.787,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.07)[ip: (-0.26), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.00), asn: 209(-0.04), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 01:41:23 -0000 When trying to port upgrade mariadb it reinstalled openssl (just about = everything for the last month has reinstalled openssl) I get this after a successful build =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for openssl-1.1.1d,1 Installing openssl-1.1.1d,1... pkg-static: openssl-1.1.1d,1 conflicts with openssl111-1.1.1d There is /usr/ports/security/openssl So why are there two different formats on the port name and how do I fix = this? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 06:07:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFE52425B1 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 06:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bk.kavitha1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Cnyv00Skz4g87 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 06:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bk.kavitha1@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id x18so3045461vsq.4 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 22:07:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8zXWoyzkTJzsmWAjpQhw5LsAablC3FIe2t9Uj1HWToY=; b=TU1/o441i2b2Ts9/leTZc5aJbeZbanEVhLNaJShQftjdyaQzqRZWCP5jQcUQZ2Z/Re CKT8AAW9ULxTtytrPs6YkIg2CIkFAkpnzB6TDQkK7y4cW+OO6Q1TypfgTBu3UW/2w4bJ 7VIwSOGz9bZD3DqVL/IghT1/YesIeFivEmXVqvHErvlZ+TzRMyyIYZIdmH3Sz2bXZMXB lJGyuhrNZiTXiuhHXnC0R89a0IYyvrnbxI6RDnxKvg7XrPTo0tGilNP3ZDOCGp1g47QW swN4LZIV7Ni3qs1AZf5V/gXtNB9hjP1KW2aq9qEJZ2VKLLT1RC8qZfiKnnMiIIoBpXez uzOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8zXWoyzkTJzsmWAjpQhw5LsAablC3FIe2t9Uj1HWToY=; b=qfpiWyhJyi9JZoanCBGPaNW0f/u3e+C41s3rzYkJNuCozrpL5bXAxBvu3FmbaaEPBh /a1QdglDhocr7OWhqo5+vB/8MbvDhOlFi2q+dfp8lzYIPSiG1DEcQgsnUTqOYFycHraJ ys/XPSx1ncaDpH++j3738SthMcFFElAMOyvRB3mzcONEFDSFPAudlyZXXLCgwYArK6r1 FPHX4ZxkpiWm1xY3JgPpY3w1hmpNcHwSizERpCmrApEjp0bwsojjWsnTapWK+j07XlHc F98eJX0zhWO3Xjr5jgiMIHgpz/xTE3ATPTA6MJIuFV3aLneXmIG4wvUaHuy1OvT2zg2C N59g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUM0OKjoWRZ6K8JOcSkxlDnvlFzQBPauA7PD+Ab1pyatxc/qy5B PE8DM5nxjnkTbnJXmv8Dbz/LFgGoxk8TkQDT8NPJKiwf X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwIxFGzxGcl4DXoJaM2JiNqlJ0BGm3uF+qQQvqSxo36fXXtoDRBPRQ+0Zb9eNt7mliC0in7eBeUxiotghBoY5Q= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:402:: with SMTP id d2mr835117vsq.146.1580969253638; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 22:07:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: kavitha bk Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:37:12 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: FORTIFY_SOURCE in FreeBSD To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Cnyv00Skz4g87 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TU1/o441; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bkkavitha1@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bkkavitha1@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.67), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.98), asn: 15169(-1.74), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:07:36 -0000 Hi What is the current status of FORTIFY_SOURCE in FreeBSD? We use BSD 11 in which I see hardening-check /usr/bin/su /usr/bin/su: Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable! Stack protected: no, not found! Fortify Source functions: unknown, no protectable libc functions used Read-only relocations: no, not found! Immediate binding: no, not found! Is it recommended to enable by default? Thanks Kavitha From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 09:33:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289912473D7 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout006aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CtWx25RZz3LtP for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id zdWnicDBY4hsvzdWnihDu5; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:32:53 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=F9QpiZpN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=DBwwDor5xuMA:10 a=7Z-5TkyvAAAA:8 a=BSLAKytkAAAA:8 a=g1NbmzetHAwYkaWMhA8A:9 a=UGeGqEX0rCY85L6Q:21 a=DmsSbKwkFsRmUtPv:21 a=WcoL0p9OcOQA:10 a=zX-9W-ELAj7UF4fcnrjh:22 a=F4Nn9yzgEZuqEVi4_X-i:22 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <535a5742.1c69fb81.21fce.7f8bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfD/xkzfcJd/yssa6ar8F7CHeWasAyJb2HCXRwZ2U8G+lqqtWPXhwZVp1cW5yUOyFG3iCjpYjiKES/usHlQdIVsuXJ5iqRk3gI0pVnkwtfCSE/A310bbK g1SKX7h5cv9eCmN5zF+Ljd4zfThw6LvD6MAvAUm3th272M1BbOqQBhKH X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48CtWx25RZz3LtP X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.137 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.35 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[163.177.28.96.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; MISSING_DATE(1.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.16)[0.163,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.990,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 47.43.24.0/21(-0.43), asn: 40294(0.81), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:33:02 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:33:02 -0000 > Kevin Oberman writes: > > > Where would I find User Agent Switcher by Linder? Would it be on a > > > Mozilla site, and would it work with SeaMonkey? > > > Would the several Firefox or SeaMonkey extensions have similar > > > functionality? > > It's available through Firefox from about:addons. It is the one by Linder, > > one of at eat three extensions of the same name. I don't know about > > SeaMonkey. Does it support the extension interface like Firefox? If so, it > > will probably work. You might also check the website at > > http://mybrowseraddon.com/useragent-switcher.html > Seamonkey - which was my default browser until it was no longer > updated - came with this ability built in. The only problem was the > list of alternate identities was vintage, like, 2000 with no way (that > I knew of) to change it. > Respectfully, > Robert Huff I went to seamonkey-project.org website a few months ago, saw it was still being developed, not dead, not lame-duck. I defined a separate profile, named "chase", where I went to about:config, defined general.useragent.override (not sure if I remembered that perfectly) to be the regular user agent string but with "SeaMonkey" removed. Then the web server recognized the browser as Firefox. I don't see what's so bad about including "SeaMonkey", but that's how the web server software works: buggy, or maybe the bug is in the head of that software developer and/or webmasters who continue to use that web server software even after being informed about the bug. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 12:54:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86AD22B9AC for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Cz0V52dZz41YN for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1580993673; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=y0U/wJlMwbbqEmy7ae5Dve5BX4w=; b=W2U3mcpeAF5bJFEyeEe9+x09EM6IbslTvlTF2y+/NDVrvxEsXd7WgoI49PDEN9AC SsSsmkket5uEMkLmhJlIR5CSbwWg2XjohcqXeycWUlqT6+WRplVAgAY4f2RpPSA0 i9sNW2/2ShxF5U19/2fE3UBQ1tnybBEuq3wjTgxyV0N3VvosKWy1dElNYDmPLVhq tyxkOvpTFi9eMnr8iei8uaWh8rKDHA2tuO8bxDDP9XD9GtlcIySikDLBW188UIZR szGJsHUhOZ5yJl3eDpA4+U+BVSCgPTSX8ZaGJwipueoic32PEMWnYlFcVYU71J8t MInhGpUKMgQZ69PhanS1ag==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=bugy+3Si c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:117 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=XRQyMpdBKAEA:10 a=l697ptgUJYAA:10 a=48faUk6PgeAA:10 a=BSLAKytkAAAA:8 a=VKXRLGy_Tyh7gAhPnAIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=F4Nn9yzgEZuqEVi4_X-i:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [209.6.230.48] ([209.6.230.48:53606] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id FA/4C-56402-98C0C3E5; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 07:54:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24124.3209.81054.611504@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:54:33 -0500 From: Robert Huff To: "Thomas Mueller" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 In-Reply-To: <0E.67.13305.55DDB3E5@mx01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <535a5742.1c69fb81.21fce.7f8bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <0E.67.13305.55DDB3E5@mx01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Cz0V52dZz41YN X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=W2U3mcpe; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-1.47)[ip: (-9.28), ipnet: 69.168.97.0/24(1.09), asn: 36271(0.90), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[twc.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.97.168.69.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:54:35 -0000 Thomas Mueller writes: > > Seamonkey - which was my default browser until it was no longer > > updated - came with this ability built in. The only problem was the > > list of alternate identities was vintage, like, 2000 with no way (that > > I knew of) to change it. > > I went to seamonkey-project.org website a few months ago, saw it > was still being developed, not dead, not lame-duck. Fair enough. However: there is no port. Hasn't been for months. Since I have neither the skill or the time to create and maintain one ... far as I'm concerned seamonkey is dead. Do you know something I don't know? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 15:32:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F8722E9F8 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48D2VP0J8hz48ym for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFA4B6235 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:32:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=U0iOoGR83Taf HnGaAyTGkbOyKj0=; b=PAWIDDKe9gAzvTtlxKe7mWa15VF9L7X42kHxl2UDyh6T Syhvjk/QByVGSxHFqJbjd7ZHkRaOHgxh2wozJTQInr1qE/KYDwHeQSb7UiDVrqHp eZMzPrYTLLmcdj0ncERPOfauD5XkBAkp6H4Td6wAwBAwAalqaHaXZH4gYUlJo0o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kt2uxg dHKhMTydzNpl4UYtsSgo+zYTaqYIxjK0sqc4pzv3jaUCe6m8PKbrduCDWVhpTk4Q TODXv6jJO4tcXYI265qLTYn0AtrT+9Hq4JP8f85KNN8O4stp5m8ClzH3Sieuj9Cg chZUl1dRMCHvQD0FAewyXGvbOcuNqsWjMY6qY= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B84B6234 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:32:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [24.185.115.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8034EB6233 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:32:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkeenan@pobox.com) Subject: Re: p5-Locale-Language? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: James E Keenan Message-ID: <6d3199de-834f-30cc-29fd-f38932ceafee@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:32:06 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D6343CF2-48F5-11EA-BD1A-B0405B776F7B-57062903!pb-smtp20.pobox.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48D2VP0J8hz48ym X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:32:13 -0000 On 2/5/20,Doug Sampson wrote: To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: p5-Locale-Language? Message-ID: <8a12d0aeb775499c95ba5652b8cf739e@dawnsign.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" How do I go about requesting a new Perl port for the Locale::Language module that was taken out of Perl 5.30? www/foswiki depends on that module and some of its functions have not worked since I upgraded the wiki system to 5.30. Since I use ports exclusively, I do not wish to revert to cpan to install such modules. ~Doug A quick check on CPAN shows Locale::Language to be part of the Locale-Codes distribution (https://metacpan.org/release/Locale-Codes). A search on FreeBSD Ports (https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=locale-codes&stype=all&sektion=all) shows that there already exists a port for Locale-Codes. However, it appears to be several versions behind CPAN. So perhaps you could contact the maintainer to do an update of the port. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 16:59:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F38230CB8 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 16:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48D4Rb0t6Kz4GrM for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 16:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 85e2a966 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:59:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 348228f4 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:59:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b111ed3a for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:59:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b7e757f0 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:59:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:59:47 -0500 From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm-353 Message-ID: <20200206115947.62cef914@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <24124.3209.81054.611504@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <535a5742.1c69fb81.21fce.7f8bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <0E.67.13305.55DDB3E5@mx01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com> <24124.3209.81054.611504@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48D4Rb0t6Kz4GrM X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.191.136]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-2.19)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(0.53), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[136.191.69.159.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 16:59:56 -0000 On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:54:33 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: >=20 > Thomas Mueller writes: >=20 > > > Seamonkey - which was my default browser until it was no > > > longer updated - came with this ability built in. The only > > > problem was the list of alternate identities was vintage, like, > > > 2000 with no way (that I knew of) to change it. > > =20 > > I went to seamonkey-project.org website a few months ago, saw it > > was still being developed, not dead, not lame-duck. >=20 > Fair enough. > However: there is no port. > Hasn't been for months. > Since I have neither the skill or the time to create and > maintain one ... far as I'm concerned seamonkey is dead. > Do you know something I don't know? >=20 >=20 > Respectfully, >=20 >=20 > Robert Huff >=20 >=20 >=20 There is a talks on freebsd forum: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/disaster-strikes-seamonkey-removed-from-= ports-tree.71335/ --=20 =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D.=20 Napoleon Bonaparte From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 18:24:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FF123328D for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48D6K53Mdcz4PDp; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mousie.catspoiler.org (unknown [76.212.85.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: truckman) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08B1428048; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:24:22 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: xterm-353 To: Thomas Mueller cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <202002060933.0169X85o042518@gw.catspoiler.org> Message-ID: References: <20200202103600.1959de17@dismail.de> <20200202154227.GB1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200202121118.71446c54@dismail.de> <20200202123845.46fc2d8b@dismail.de> <20200202185446.GB60645@server.rulingia.com> <20200202205050.GA2182@squirrel.exwg.net> <600545092.3036828.1580684357864.JavaMail.zimbra@his.com> <20200203075041.GA2321@squirrel.exwg.net> <5e3957d5.1c69fb81.a3f10.6cedSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <535a5742.1c69fb81.21fce.7f8bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <202002060933.0169X85o042518@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Disposition: INLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:24:25 -0000 On 6 Feb, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> Kevin Oberman writes: >> > > Where would I find User Agent Switcher by Linder? Would it be >> > > on a Mozilla site, and would it work with SeaMonkey? > >> > > Would the several Firefox or SeaMonkey extensions have similar >> > > functionality? > >> > It's available through Firefox from about:addons. It is the one by >> > Linder, one of at eat three extensions of the same name. I don't >> > know about SeaMonkey. Does it support the extension interface like >> > Firefox? If so, it will probably work. You might also check the >> > website at http://mybrowseraddon.com/useragent-switcher.html > >> Seamonkey - which was my default browser until it was no longer >> updated - came with this ability built in. The only problem was >> the list of alternate identities was vintage, like, 2000 with no way >> (that I knew of) to change it. > > >> Respectfully, > > >> Robert Huff > > I went to seamonkey-project.org website a few months ago, saw it was > still being developed, not dead, not lame-duck. > > I defined a separate profile, named "chase", where I went to > about:config, defined general.useragent.override (not sure if I > remembered that perfectly) to be the regular user agent string but > with "SeaMonkey" removed. > > Then the web server recognized the browser as Firefox. I don't see > what's so bad about including "SeaMonkey", but that's how the web > server software works: buggy, or maybe the bug is in the head of that > software developer and/or webmasters who continue to use that web > server software even after being informed about the bug. I use Firefox. In my case, the server was upset that I wasn't running my browser on Windows or Mac. I changed the user agent string to tell the server that I was running the latest Firefox on Windows 2000, which made it happy. I tried for Windows 98, but couldn't get that to work. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 00:55:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2DE23F7CB for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 00:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DGzv1h8fz3R1K; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 00:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:1055:671f:be7b:c975]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 277BA2AE2D; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 00:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:55:01 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? Message-ID: <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE amd64 References: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:55:07 -0000 Hi, I think UPDATING 20200101 should help you. On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:41:19PM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: > When trying to port upgrade mariadb it reinstalled openssl (just about everything for the last month has reinstalled openssl) > > I get this after a successful build > > ===> Registering installation for openssl-1.1.1d,1 > Installing openssl-1.1.1d,1... > pkg-static: openssl-1.1.1d,1 conflicts with openssl111-1.1.1d > > There is /usr/ports/security/openssl > > So why are there two different formats on the port name and how do I fix this? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 12:59:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A924A24C0D3 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Db3t27GPz4WdT for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1j03ED-000MWp-Bg; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 13:59:25 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 13:59:25 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Doug Sampson Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: p5-Locale-Language? Message-ID: <20200207125925.GE37073@home.opsec.eu> References: <8a12d0aeb775499c95ba5652b8cf739e@dawnsign.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a12d0aeb775499c95ba5652b8cf739e@dawnsign.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Db3t27GPz4WdT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.84 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.87)[-0.873,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.969,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 12:59:38 -0000 Hi! > How do I go about requesting a new Perl port for the Locale::Language > module that was taken out of Perl 5.30? www/foswiki depends on that > module and some of its functions have not worked since I upgraded > the wiki system to 5.30. Since I use ports exclusively, I do not > wish to revert to cpan to install such modules. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243956 has an update to the most recent version on CPAN for misc/p5-Locale-Codes Let's see if the maintainer approves. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 16:20:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C6F24FB7B for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DgX52bz5z3F6M for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 576DF24FB7A; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572E824FB79 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DgX32Y41z3F6H for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 67d0ab9c for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:20:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 65b1fde6 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:20:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0d04a2d0 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:20:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id eb928a97 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:20:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:20:42 -0500 From: ajtiM To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: nss update again Message-ID: <20200207112042.0fa31bcf@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48DgX32Y41z3F6H X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.191.136]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-2.19)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(0.52), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[136.191.69.159.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 16:20:53 -0000 Hi! nss 3.49.2_1 built without problem but version 3.49.2_2 doesn't: File exists gmake[4]: *** [../../coreconf/rules.mk:393: FreeBSD12.1_OPT.OBJ/pathsub.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/security/nss/work/nss-3.49.2/nss/coreconf/nsinstall' gmake[3]: *** [../coreconf/rules.mk:101: libs] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/security/nss/work/nss-3.49.2/nss/coreconf' gmake[2]: *** [coreconf/rules.mk:64: export] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/security/nss/work/nss-3.49.2/nss' =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/nss *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/security/nss =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for security/nss =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for security/nss failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update --=20 =E2=80=9CIn politics stupidity is not a handicap=E2=80=9D.=20 Napoleon Bonaparte From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 17:02:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DBE228AAF for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DhRx2qbBz3HDj for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 60EAA228AAE; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AD6228AAD for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw1-f53.google.com (mail-yw1-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DhRv6Hvlz3HDf for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw1-f53.google.com with SMTP id f204so1151279ywc.10 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:02:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0JfZ7UijjmHLF2fgY9wneJ84gjtxZGs6wbSIUb/3XJE=; b=j0Ht1cJkCVOxWqjBCPQa9SgoYtufWCiwipoa9/oxRp922nkYOARLGdB0D+GMp+mpCJ vj4ZBrQeArINwGEKKaxFiXbUnpIX4BMMUo20BETNOlqXd6qgSCk4+KAcSKpAhmHfiaGS 8Uh2G7ICjZlQUIxT1zmFWei1aFmw5k5nB2vm2o53MQq/teqoQmgZ4npN+Dslg0GoMigW S8xSJvQlMUywt5TAGliRlWMTbY077pNeSJ/tVIqIgnaxxkKxAFcsE5CzKygFC3coFpdm uyKP6gRuHDAalLglO19zgNk9nerpIAW6DlN3MkkDZnMZcKgeCjggY8/uoHr7LLV7/v55 2tvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1OG4pzhgjeeX+CXI1eXS62Eu5z3goKBw0gLVgiMg8EfBC56XM aqrqQ9KEYJkMQqrZZ5RjSTO0iNrsU+drTSr7lSc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzaShj0vGKjwxcDh4HkB3CsvOIsauuvNkUl57g2xiQBUd+Th7uam5TgAx4BctM5DoptbF8Alh7vn9cZjR2UPfU= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:f2c2:: with SMTP id b185mr14226ywf.380.1581094938326; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:02:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200207112042.0fa31bcf@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20200207112042.0fa31bcf@dismail.de> From: Li-Wen Hsu Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 01:02:06 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: nss update again To: ajtiM Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48DhRv6Hvlz3HDf X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[53.161.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[53.161.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.84)[ip: (-9.36), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.02), asn: 15169(-1.74), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 17:02:21 -0000 On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 12:20 AM ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > nss 3.49.2_1 built without problem but version 3.49.2_2 doesn't: It seems we still cannot get rid ofMAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes, I added it back in r525491. Please check. Sorry for the breakage and thanks for reporting. Li-Wen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 18:06:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2F3229A9D for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Djsg3lhnz3Kkr for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:06:13 -0700 References: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Djsg3lhnz3Kkr X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.970,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.07)[ip: (-0.26), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.00), asn: 209(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 18:06:17 -0000 On 06 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > I think UPDATING 20200101 should help you. Nope, that doesn=E2=80=99t help me. I updated openssl in January, and as = I said it has been recompiled several times (well, at least six) since = then as I have updated ports. This behavior of confusing the two forms = =E2=80=9Copenssl-1.1.1d,1=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Copenssl111-1.1.1f=E2=80=9D= is new. > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:41:19PM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> When trying to port upgrade mariadb it reinstalled openssl (just = about everything for the last month has reinstalled openssl) >>=20 >> I get this after a successful build >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for openssl-1.1.1d,1 >> Installing openssl-1.1.1d,1... >> pkg-static: openssl-1.1.1d,1 conflicts with openssl111-1.1.1d >>=20 >> There is /usr/ports/security/openssl >>=20 >> So why are there two different formats on the port name and how do I = fix this. --=20 It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought...should be = literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 18:16:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282B3229FC4 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Dk534qShz3LKD for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:16:06 -0700 References: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <944CDA27-93F9-4E02-B799-F8FD37D42D61@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Dk534qShz3LKD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.970,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990,0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.07)[ip: (-0.25), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.00), asn: 209(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 18:16:08 -0000 On 07 Feb 2020, at 11:06, @lbutlr wrote: > I updated openssl in January, and as I said it has been recompiled = several times=20 To be clear, I did everything that UPDATING 20200101 mentions, including = reinstalling all ports, changing make.conf, etc. But all along, the system has reported that the version is = openssl111-1.1.1, until 05 Feb. BTW, there is no new version of openssl = listed in Postmaster and the distill in security/openssl says the date = is Wed Sep 11 02:04:23 MDT 2019. =F0=9F=91=B9 root # cat security/openssl/distinfo = = [11:14] [/usr/ports]=20 TIMESTAMP =3D 1568189063 SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) =3D = 1e3a91bc1f9dfce01af26026f856e064eab4c8ee0a8f457b5ae30b40b8b711f2 SIZE (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) =3D 8845861 --=20 When this kiss is over it will start again But not be any different could be exactly the same It's hard to imagine that nothing at all Could be so exciting, could be this much fun From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 20:20:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1609022CE09 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from kmailer.gwdg.de (kmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Dmr15shgz3yKF for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from excmbx-03.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.9.218] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (GWDG Mailer) (envelope-from ) id 1j0A6Y-0007D1-4D; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 21:19:58 +0100 Received: from krabat.raven.hur (10.250.9.199) by EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:19:57 +0100 Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? To: "@lbutlr" , FreeBSD References: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> <944CDA27-93F9-4E02-B799-F8FD37D42D61@kreme.com> From: Rainer Hurling Message-ID: <5c40981d-b87a-9351-1579-0e0a6e552b8c@gwdg.de> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:19:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <944CDA27-93F9-4E02-B799-F8FD37D42D61@kreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.250.9.199] X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) To EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Dmr15shgz3yKF X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rhurlin@gwdg.de designates 134.76.11.26 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rhurlin@gwdg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:134.76.10.0/23]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gwdg.de]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[26.11.76.134.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.76.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.87)[ipnet: 134.76.0.0/16(-4.41), asn: 680(0.08), country: DE(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 20:20:03 -0000 Am 07.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb @lbutlr: > On 07 Feb 2020, at 11:06, @lbutlr wrote: >> I updated openssl in January, and as I said it has been recompiled several times > > To be clear, I did everything that UPDATING 20200101 mentions, including reinstalling all ports, changing make.conf, etc. > > But all along, the system has reported that the version is openssl111-1.1.1, until 05 Feb. BTW, there is no new version of openssl listed in Postmaster and the distill in security/openssl says the date is Wed Sep 11 02:04:23 MDT 2019. > > 👹 root # cat security/openssl/distinfo [11:14] [/usr/ports] > TIMESTAMP = 1568189063 > SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) = 1e3a91bc1f9dfce01af26026f856e064eab4c8ee0a8f457b5ae30b40b8b711f2 > SIZE (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) = 8845861 > > > Did you try 'portmaster -o security/openssl openssl111-1.1.1d' (with DEFAULT_VERSIONS= ssl=openssl, instead ssl=openssl111)? For me, that worked. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 23:01:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A04230B28 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DrQL0zdzz47hl for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: LuKreme Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:01:27 -0700 Message-Id: <4F02A8DC-A859-40B7-A9C4-53E96F20436B@kreme.com> References: <5c40981d-b87a-9351-1579-0e0a6e552b8c@gwdg.de> Cc: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <5c40981d-b87a-9351-1579-0e0a6e552b8c@gwdg.de> To: Rainer Hurling X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48DrQL0zdzz47hl X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.977,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-0.07)[ip: (-0.25), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.00), asn: 209(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 23:01:32 -0000 On Feb 7, 2020, at 13:20, Rainer Hurling wrote: >=20 > Did you try >=20 > 'portmaster -o security/openssl openssl111-1.1.1d' Yes, that failed with no error. Trying to uninstall openssl111 said there wa= s no such port. > (with DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3D ssl=3Dopenssl, instead ssl=3Dopenssl111)? That was set back in January. > For me, that worked. pkg delete -f openssl111 cd security/openssl=20 make install That worked. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 8 07:17:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46F223A896 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 07:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from kmailer.gwdg.de (kmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F3QD1nGlz4VRr for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 07:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from excmbx-03.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.9.218] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (GWDG Mailer) (envelope-from ) id 1j0KMU-0003zA-2a; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 08:17:06 +0100 Received: from krabat.raven.hur (10.250.9.199) by EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:17:05 +0100 Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? To: LuKreme CC: FreeBSD References: <5c40981d-b87a-9351-1579-0e0a6e552b8c@gwdg.de> <4F02A8DC-A859-40B7-A9C4-53E96F20436B@kreme.com> From: Rainer Hurling Message-ID: <4479132c-ac2c-1e96-7106-9abb5e09d90e@gwdg.de> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:16:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F02A8DC-A859-40B7-A9C4-53E96F20436B@kreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.250.9.199] X-ClientProxiedBy: excmbx-11.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.220) To EXCMBX-03.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.218) X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48F3QD1nGlz4VRr X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rhurlin@gwdg.de designates 134.76.11.26 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rhurlin@gwdg.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.36 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:134.76.10.0/23]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gwdg.de]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[26.11.76.134.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:134.76.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.86)[ipnet: 134.76.0.0/16(-4.37), asn: 680(0.08), country: DE(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 07:17:09 -0000 Am 08.02.20 um 00:01 schrieb LuKreme: > On Feb 7, 2020, at 13:20, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> >> Did you try >> >> 'portmaster -o security/openssl openssl111-1.1.1d' > > Yes, that failed with no error. Trying to uninstall openssl111 said there was no such port. That could be because of an already deinstalled openssl111, if you tried before with portmaster. In such cases, the reinstallation failed, but a copy of the precedent installation is under /usr/ports/packages/portmaster-backup ... > >> (with DEFAULT_VERSIONS= ssl=openssl, instead ssl=openssl111)? > > That was set back in January. > >> For me, that worked. > > pkg delete -f openssl111 > cd security/openssl > make install > > That worked. Nice to hear. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 8 20:22:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B57124AE33; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 20:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from alpine.spintel.net.au (alpine.spintel.net.au [203.23.236.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FNrQ2Npdz4G7c; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 20:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from drunkfish.andyit.com.au (210-1-210-40-cpe.spintel.net.au [210.1.210.40]) by alpine.spintel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 182674C15B4; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 07:12:58 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [172.22.2.15] (tosh2.andyit.com.au [172.22.2.15]) by drunkfish.andyit.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 018KCvxp054719 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 06:12:58 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org From: Andy Farkas Subject: sound Message-ID: <8e7d5ac1-43a7-e3e3-223d-b50440b21398@andyit.com.au> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 06:12:53 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48FNrQ2Npdz4G7c X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andyf@andyit.com.au has no SPF policy when checking 203.23.236.77) smtp.mailfrom=andyf@andyit.com.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.35 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[andyit.com.au]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.81)[0.812,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(3.74)[ip: (9.81), ipnet: 203.23.236.0/24(4.91), asn: 18390(3.96), country: AU(0.01)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.999,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[77.236.23.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:18390, ipnet:203.23.236.0/24, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:22:31 -0000 Hi, seems to be a fairly quiet weekend so... I am building a new desktop workstation to replace my aging 8-yo one that has been as reliable as the sun rising every morning. I build things using portmaster and select options that are relevant. I'm wondering about sound options. Do I want ALSA, PULSEAUDIO, SNDIO, other, neither, all? I don't need "sound server support" - all I want  is to play MP3 files (mplayer) and watch utUbe videos. And the occasional game of warzone2000. Thanks for any input. -andyf From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 8 20:46:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47224B414 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 20:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FPN053C8z4Gxv for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 20:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 018Kjt7s075564 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Feb 2020 15:46:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Subject: Re: sound To: Andy Farkas , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <8e7d5ac1-43a7-e3e3-223d-b50440b21398@andyit.com.au> From: George Mitchell Autocrypt: addr=george+freebsd@m5p.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFgnLnwBEADAJDiBKQX77LFRz9wZW8mz3KvaQol2nIremcws0F1mz/zgFlk6uhQVtwnL wb4XL5LdFwcNE1+QZzPLcbYWoWQlz0lBw1bMuKAgr0S6V2e0+I0DqhKeslVFctcTwtvT6pnK VLZXO/7ZGAaLzG4K5vSPzgoevU+YI/pxNsVCH2UO/c3jQW63uEt25mIZbCF1Pu4jgp4RhIgF ujn877r/j6OwBwjzRUu3E6ADp+U825d+5YCuQMEH0wIPnn9GTpXvfdKdbwOIl2akqXqs4cnk iATWfK3r6D4mvDEj1OPHlTvJYcfic7aOIiAwmx1C1v78GjXOdOOA0SGffNix3C2/8oZUO1+V Aet4MKpUKkduWSvULhIkHNZ5Nu8SIJOqge8pmtHxuNXAMfMrAjMdjPwwBFLsYg3Xa2E2oJwg ehTauwd/EDJFcVCyDCyCAYOi/BH/+XQyxzgDlY9N9qj9tHqhVPI6XK7t8UVffGiZUq4rHp5J RdOToqiTNC6eCJBczhMIW+DuFvWU9e6W708T1dz0Accn6Lrgk4eRIn3GFPBG+TxnpjAqHsbW 607dcnD3YKAqY4e+khczL4EObhe7dC1v2fmZiAC6Ds3WHR11IfqoUgCkIwJ590Ej+ElygJFF XxI82wtEz9hkeLLvItpyEJNVjppViRW+Dgl/U7ypHB3qDgYjgwARAQABtChHZW9yZ2UgTWl0 Y2hlbGwgPGdlb3JnZStmcmVlYnNkQG01cC5jb20+iQJUBBMBCAA+FiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZX wRES3m+p4fkFAlhZcR0CGyMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQwRES 3m+p4flqmw/9Emr/ydTG2n9o/IX1yVCNcHVFenVrcOY0L+DGQYZRO/XpLvsGYcuSIQId1w7h l4HZKI89ri2fF2ks6upMqBajLf8s7a8PnYrbw5bPaoOFyNTjv57GLZVsYw95kmMUpK6siuAA fXvHfKUpC/sThbwSv/1CLryVG74+5vdI8j7cQeDM436FThxlVfHKrILIiL34D4WThFB3hV/Y 2A+mQwXmdLcuQXXeAazqsFJL8sgEKSC7GMcExDkVpGc5Rh2hu97a4Sa7qWX9G/YdZOrcDacJ XxfvePn3m3WfRtXN/r0lUfiVXiqkFfbvqSaZQ0I4UvZXNGd/gH4jKHtX9RTH9G96UZeHNoMo tPw9U0fx8Ceh72nUL9qzqnmok/ryWm+6gt4Q1eRP7QAosOa1g/RgUdS1Z9IuCmbXMDp5kbNw L4ZoDMF5U3mmh8/IOKkhGopNLbNv0mwUgC59pnCptiOVx8DyckXWC4L2r6PKbWGrcGIzsUER 9smfL10gpp5H5agjwwPZI6/kzJ0R5nBzQWAlwqI73YAy6JI0HTD6lvxW7yWm2fGjEfmyaBOU 8OLUin7auoFSn+QmD5yNCUn5Ls77qHARkT1ZGocAnQkvZBGTwXpvyJixygXsm+vSUFDYBOSn cR54vdXOEMqrJk6SGau5YI9V7EhQVveE1BUp8ofWf2oo4RG5Ag0EWCcufAEQALuTOxmqMFE+ ieev/rcL3wVJrcuKS+pBbKCY9IIL0OwVf98HQJJcgdOsdDhruVd19nJNlwZ3Fc34wLw7y2GO 9WrpZiYKnI4n9urhLE5r1ydBInlI/1UKZWgM3/dPjJtcXMsC3vnqR9DmOxW4/SbqJDjP3XzO FleT4yip3AaNhPGwEPTZrubVp5hp/JojaZn690TLRwOFXg8NcjpOEs0Bq9M+OLpmsF0flrgs yDfS7y+SQ17R4Iq9T7RxZvZVAh510yGGIZIETYO/4Dh417VVm+gaksOVh2egetpUUvYYc0Ub KaP+5F/WGNrmRb1F6SKypvLlKkYAHCsUUSzsAGl9gbQhEEpuOMbUKp1979HoRMkW+8046kIo 8BZ6ph8izG/g4dZOaEqKGEhqdhYIB7UwMtFFuPtSs5Nl6JrZYni/nzFtTmtVCgcj9PNqrzqt fNFYhNznD6St6wxp3TOm9D3TQF0dzwBM1jZpb8WvmK3k6oy8hbpjiBzxn3kyRA9Vzy+PdbN/ G5a1k0rpZu/ivpBuLCDVGljUmgQigXg6xkk5UxBoHp7MPvG9prZ5jqdEa2r1KgnGjaq+VJsu Uqrw10dVgeG1NulDU1+sQl+/mwtflbkimhjDDjxsVgfrv7uvV/9be+gGm1KATuqdgCboSb1s QAo5ARfwFfChrnh+fTfPpPKHABEBAAGJAiQEGAEIAA8FAlgnLnwCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQwRES 3m+p4fno9w/4m+swztkzxSWdutjgSv2mw+PdrKWVGFAUD2HoY1Qpi5LNLE6s9pP3qzwpQYwK viOufVJYWZ540ss6BImZBGJwyHouacqrpZjpRo5+ftj07rY1SNd8QjcHDggPfpgJ1D4Il3Xi vRg5/gzkXnRu8dXeVvMP1Ndk/F5wcoLZlQwFtPfu2xyRYIsveXMoyypAvAFSaAGXU0hRzuDJ fGI3LFvpI9UXU2C4MMzjfyZyD2NJEDKOACTo85QQzxgheTDQaDocXW00wknXFMwEItiXp8dO 2zEml/3Kj4efDfjqGpjNefjK0cnj02Byt7y6GozWXyIylrXu0SN9qWRzUVZH3+q+ijA4q3Gm 9uWzLdpjN4QWAiiaEvMhLPohp9DdLsy3kAWWrA3+pAfHSTZXrobMMbSeBkE9E4/WxdKl0nM7 TNslAWcxkTd/7Ly9cxwT8wFdHuQB1hgCmIQxDNXHL1N1ANTeUYum1w9nUg6e1M0UWu+nk3Cw qL7oL2KZe13mQnU/CFwlhbf+i//j3SXrQLlIVQv9Fn805bxIcVo9yqUZyoiV7EUpvOsxDCZh ej3mNYF5nRCf6trEJQVk0aLC26zJAYExykdUlRqc4I13XPhlt+aFSMMkoL/thYO6e9oNFK6Q aJEKXomzxxqpceJVmPH6zvqJbOboAdE/mOD0PoS1M6saIQ== Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 15:45:42 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8e7d5ac1-43a7-e3e3-223d-b50440b21398@andyit.com.au> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iQt4XwpIJ4BbFur3JTqPafwBkcBiML2ki" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,HELO_NO_DOMAIN autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48FPN053C8z4Gxv X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; IP_SCORE(-2.83)[ip: (-9.87), ipnet: 74.104.0.0/16(-4.93), asn: 701(0.69), country: US(-0.05)]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:46:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iQt4XwpIJ4BbFur3JTqPafwBkcBiML2ki Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3KQirNufk9IelT8qrPGJAyDQMuAVQgdRB"; protected-headers="v1" From: George Mitchell To: Andy Farkas , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: sound References: <8e7d5ac1-43a7-e3e3-223d-b50440b21398@andyit.com.au> In-Reply-To: <8e7d5ac1-43a7-e3e3-223d-b50440b21398@andyit.com.au> --3KQirNufk9IelT8qrPGJAyDQMuAVQgdRB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-02-08 15:12, Andy Farkas wrote: >=20 > Hi, seems to be a fairly quiet weekend so... >=20 > I am building a new desktop workstation to replace my aging 8-yo one > that has been as reliable as the sun rising every morning. >=20 > I build things using portmaster and select options that are relevant. >=20 > I'm wondering about sound options. >=20 > Do I want ALSA, PULSEAUDIO, SNDIO, other, neither, all? >=20 > I don't need "sound server support" - all I want=C2=A0 is to play MP3 f= iles > (mplayer) and watch utUbe videos. And the occasional game of warzone200= 0. >=20 > Thanks for any input. >=20 > -andyf > [...] My simple solution would be to compile multimedia/vlc with its default settings (or alternatively multimedia/mplayer) and that will pull in what you need -- George --3KQirNufk9IelT8qrPGJAyDQMuAVQgdRB-- --iQt4XwpIJ4BbFur3JTqPafwBkcBiML2ki Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZXwRES3m+p4fkFAl4/HgMACgkQwRES3m+p 4fkUrA/9HsrMFuQKVNuxjmI5DN3jEQ+6hJcm2v2EAGlTbTmMWrUFwDCxgTuqsEUH d/TllLF/Q1sUbb1+j0SdltMsmMyNG4AeyTUclz+I5a0fHUN7SLyxcuaeoYTkJ+ml K7eIcEKfkBFY05fpa44cn6dGlWUb36QRznt5C5CD6AbS4Zrug9l9p2r/tMUEq1ML stA4xvpHFn+kcQDda315D62IEmTsDeUQDQO23U8IpA0U0KiHlGMmxw5X4JM4rYFU NadBU8XTW34rT7uDBjREnRRYoKVkfSflvkI4yEsP2vqEb1w0VlJ/kl86ZroQ4nXj mp0VkQ2P35BUwUATV/AA4I3xUZZkShx2wHosRTG01FVzbG1k2ZiGx98UI2LeiUdS MzZRyHym/N0foTv7tTz+Dm0Cwq0lY7WLIDihKZJ/uA+zCJuYb/8mYk4ffvZoY5Cf sDFR6bUrPIT2yasmCE2L7eVCOrb2co+qEG8NU5pHeI3w7lHlcseGHQ4A2KNKSVMs FBIZQVLn4Af7KTv+xxzUSpH3tQkvDaZxOXH/fcp5OixqmWH+OrFDR+xoX/JSH3n0 b/AJLUXr09UcP+RMLJSQ03+fdygPvKlCDGuK0dXJHahcoE7KK0T8LGi4BFMqygJA 9cQ8wGNfV1EVMXvzoEbYHtE3OqhqnYM4vQuYtwuIx+YYYeXo7ps= =XuNb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iQt4XwpIJ4BbFur3JTqPafwBkcBiML2ki-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 8 20:47:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CB424B4B1 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 20:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theron.tarigo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FPPD23vgz4H3B for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 20:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theron.tarigo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id c24so2208957qtp.5 for ; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 12:47:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Youo9YumtNLqGB4c5KZMpyqlI9dxNY4a5Iq5f0kocRE=; b=uBo4B4gBlZXUaK1Jj2wjcb6mANYQ7M1duXZM4zi0K/2B5FQWudDrpynV7hisElZwzf AuwPzMC3DXT4tWm193M5ISo1nd/EQqps6y6QqU96bATfkUY5gUqMwYLlYwmejIHFiY0Y BFyNYpJOlFbf19VIdYTk7xgt1VSnCXHN5+Pjst2YAnB7V6FGjV/OsuiYD4YmLKIOIrHq 2mu8e+2GV2sGQ1w1UVzszU5XzYE8aqsGdQE8HEhpWh5SvN3JV9cVUaEMpklwdGCNofWI H6JFxxbFlcA1ej+ifvuQGDIf8HrtfTjcHA63wp46q00h5I8+M3TWSZXr69aXZF4/rbBt 8crQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Youo9YumtNLqGB4c5KZMpyqlI9dxNY4a5Iq5f0kocRE=; b=UDfjpLDT6wtRDeGTt2Jexx7Izt/cpdN+2DjKtFqeNH/q+82YMcZtqSSqTfxziFEp/K hteRkc3pAZwKIqDx9Prho4Sdcu6sxgG7pZFbxQ0JhydOg6bssaCRSFd3pgnXptd6H1Ni bpFk/oz8wJRRgSUpZvia05Y/mlluAPEAthjnIsK4bzU6LRLwVw4lZRx65GaRVRUFGLsc /uhaBN29AApz//jYhFfuX/dt7N1Ef7lkPM8ycBa66jwxvaYNuLtRYO/+zlk9U/2MLIOT aFRBj+1iAcjf2hRxpbwEZGhcaOkpcaR9dWih/jhqKeq6Oy1iQ44HhQLRW71oSOWdIJWS 1+RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU/KBro3Ti0BSXn36X0sXbqahLwuxyQiZ53L3hTxXntgI5AzpvI P9wTvC2hxqx3C/UU2JotgcZgbYDN X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQ0ZjQOGg2U4K7NxLF9H1VhvRrVhD3g7K81FEUWzGINZey9yDgZI2IFIPtFqPJXrYVnLqOyQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1835:: with SMTP id q50mr3924828qtj.210.1581194847195; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 12:47:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [155.41.114.42] (dhcp-wifi-8021x-155-41-114-42.bu.edu. [155.41.114.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y27sm3623242qta.50.2020.02.08.12.47.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Feb 2020 12:47:26 -0800 (PST) Sender: Theron Tarigo Subject: Re: sound To: Andy Farkas , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <8e7d5ac1-43a7-e3e3-223d-b50440b21398@andyit.com.au> From: Theron Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 15:47:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8e7d5ac1-43a7-e3e3-223d-b50440b21398@andyit.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48FPPD23vgz4H3B X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=uBo4B4gB; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of therontarigo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=therontarigo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.30), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.97), asn: 15169(-1.74), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[f.2.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:47:29 -0000 On 2020-02-08 15:12, Andy Farkas wrote: > I don't need "sound server support" - all I want  is to play MP3 files > (mplayer) and watch utUbe videos. And the occasional game of warzone2000. I leave default options for firefox and mplayer.  In this case, Mplayer uses OSS (FreeBSD's native sound driver interface) directly, and Firefox uses sndio to access it.  Both work very well*.  No sound server is needed, nor do these apps' ports attempt to install one. * provided I am not disconnecting the sound device in middle of playback - that always causes a problem, unless I do run a sound server, such as virtual_oss. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 8 21:26:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE58D24C2DF for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:26:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FQGk5Lswz4KKt for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 018LQfb4006623 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 13:26:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Chris Reply-To: portmaster@BSDforge.com To: freebsd-ports Subject: What is the actual syntax used to FLAVOR ports? Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 13:26:47 -0800 Message-Id: <9120f724da0ba22abe3c7caa09415ea5@udns.ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48FQGk5Lswz4KKt X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of portmaster@BSDforge.com has no SPF policy when checking 24.113.41.81) smtp.mailfrom=portmaster@BSDforge.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[portmaster@BSDforge.com]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.47)[ip: (-0.94), ipnet: 24.113.0.0/16(-0.47), asn: 11404(-0.89), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[BSDforge.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.948,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:26:55 -0000 OK I know FLAVOR is an evolving concept=2E But I can not find the FLAVOR documentation=2E Only references in the porters handbook=2E What I think needs to be available is an entire list of flavor tags for all (port) categories=2E For example; make FLAVOR=3Dpython27 returns the error use py27=2E OK now I know how to flavor, and build python flavors=2E But what of Perl? make FLAVOR=3Dperl2=2E8=2E Nope=2E How about make FLAVOR=3Dp5-28, and so it goes=2E=2E=2E Does there exist a definitive list of flavors? It'd also be valuable for defining defaults in make=2Econf(5) Thanks! --Chris