From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 23 07:41:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570163B4D75 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZ6d1120Cz4NdR for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 232863B497A; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D653B4D74 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZ6d05xfpz4NRj for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE3723AC6 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07N7f89q050683 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:08 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07N7f8nH050682; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:08 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008230741.07N7f8nH050682@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:08 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:41:09 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/sql-workbench | 118 | 137 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/log4cxx | 0.10.0 | 0.11.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 23 19:35:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805883C5C23 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZQSr5285z42kJ for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07NJZ4rV008278 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:35:04 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 07NJZ4ZB008277 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 12:35:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 12:35:04 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: x11-wm/piewm: "ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno" Message-ID: <20200823193504.GB5141@albert.catwhisker.org> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BZQSr5285z42kJ X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.49 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[david]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.11)[-0.108]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 19:35:11 -0000 --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 06:39:10PM +0000, pkg-fallout@FreeBSD.org wrote: > You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain > is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. > Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix > build. >=20 > Maintainer: david@catwhisker.org > Last committer: swills@FreeBSD.org > Ident: $FreeBSD: head/x11-wm/piewm/Makefile 519608 2019-12-09 13= :47:16Z swills $ > Log URL: http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p5= 45731_s364466/logs/piewm-1.04_4.log > Build URL: http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=3Dhe= ad-amd64-default&build=3Dp545731_s364466 > ... > --- piewm --- > rm -f piewm > cc -o piewm -L/usr/local/lib gram.o lex.o deftwmrc.o add_window.o= gc.o list.o twm.o parse.o menus.o events.o resize.o util.o version.o ico= nmgr.o cursor.o icons.o vdt.o move.o LocPixmap.o -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -l= Xext -lX11 -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lXext -lX11 -lm -ll -lXpm -Wl,-rpat= h,/usr/local/lib > ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno > >>> defined at gram.c > >>> gram.o:(yylineno) > >>> defined at lex.c > >>> lex.o:(.data+0x0) > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocati= on) > *** [piewm] Error code 1 >=20 > make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-wm/piewm/work/piewm-1.04 > 1 error >=20 > make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-wm/piewm/work/piewm-1.04 > =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the failur= e to > the maintainer. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/x11-wm/piewm So... I confess a lack of familiarity with lex, yacc, and their work-alikes. It also appears that x11-wm/tvtwm (for which MAINTAINER is this list -- ports@FreeBSD.org) is likely similarly affected. I understand that the immediate cause is a recent change; in http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B7F9F85B-60A4-4A87-9911-BDE1CBC7BC91, dim@ mentioned: | This is because clang 11 (and gcc 10) now default to -fno-common. The | rationale is explained pretty well in... and goes on to state: | A quick fix is to add CFLAGS+=3D-fcommon to your make.conf, but that is | rather a big hammer. It is better to add it to just the ports that show | problems due to duplicated symbols. And ideally, those duplicated | symbols should be patched out of the ports. So: apparently *a* way around this is to change the Makefile (to include 'CFLAGS+=3D-fcommon') -- but I don't know if a "better" approach is feasible: we are dealing with some rather old (or, perhaps, "well-established") code, here. Advice/suggestions? Thanks! Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "Those countries that have lost control of the virus like the United States are seeing economic forecasts constantly revised down and are weaker economically." -- Dominick Stephens, Westpac NZ's chief economist See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl9CxOhfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PclGLAf/UxMFI/LvKM8fuOwfRPE2nM4fdmVJ2U39H+9WxGl/D4Hr+hH935geglfZ n638bp4084U6EgEqf88o1EMgFYvIi8LQXax3AsiPNr05SEzfOYB/oAOZBpnfuxc3 hjtbnQwom0awVEGSqmJqxS5STgL5feITSAx41pC4DOIv4lwnUuy+KiiKDcaOhYve 4aXwW5M0Ncx4Qu0sPeeNBa9YIWb1Tw6ZU7+kdOb6heEfoH1deAxaBX2/P6r4xVu5 T8iCwd58O+WJOe5WAmcCCmb2hCOdi0GsdYAwzfGHKN+h5ILT2eF6zWWNQIOpL2Xk w7XS5oHrVX/tE/vdE7jy/dGMd0gOow== =WH7K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 23 20:14:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8963C90B2 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 20:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZRLN1ldYz4QhW for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 20:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1k9wNl-000J4T-6G for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:14:25 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:14:25 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11-wm/piewm: "ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno" Message-ID: <20200823201425.GL3539@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200823193504.GB5141@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200823193504.GB5141@albert.catwhisker.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BZRLN1ldYz4QhW X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 20:14:36 -0000 Hi! > | A quick fix is to add CFLAGS+=-fcommon to your make.conf, but that is > | rather a big hammer. It is better to add it to just the ports that show > | problems due to duplicated symbols. And ideally, those duplicated > | symbols should be patched out of the ports. > > So: apparently *a* way around this is to change the Makefile (to > include 'CFLAGS+=-fcommon') -- but I don't know if a "better" approach > is feasible: we are dealing with some rather old (or, perhaps, > "well-established") code, here. > > Advice/suggestions? It's just as it says: Commit the fix with -fcommon, and then fix the code, if you can 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 07:58:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B113B377C for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BZkyY5srmz4J1g for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C96ED3B3B78; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C927D3B3B77 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZkyY4xH2z4Hw3 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD3015520 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07O7wTl0091154 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07O7wTqU091153; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008240758.07O7wTqU091153@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:29 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:30 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/libobjc2 | 2.0 | v2.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 08:12:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12883B426C for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZlG83wtzz4JtK for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F92F288DB for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::48c8:6309:6b34:5671] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:48c8:6309:6b34:5671]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81228639C1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:11:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6E5DD83D-FDDA-4E88-B9AC-39870C298215"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\)) Subject: Re: x11-wm/piewm: "ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno" Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:11:45 +0200 References: <20200823193504.GB5141@albert.catwhisker.org> To: FreeBSD Ports In-Reply-To: <20200823193504.GB5141@albert.catwhisker.org> Message-Id: <2D642C38-96C6-4736-88E1-C1B56783C701@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:12:00 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_6E5DD83D-FDDA-4E88-B9AC-39870C298215 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 23 Aug 2020, at 21:35, David Wolfskill wrote: >=20 > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 06:39:10PM +0000, pkg-fallout@FreeBSD.org = wrote: >> You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain >> is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. >> Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix >> build. >>=20 >> Maintainer: david@catwhisker.org >> Last committer: swills@FreeBSD.org >> Ident: $FreeBSD: head/x11-wm/piewm/Makefile 519608 = 2019-12-09 13:47:16Z swills $ >> Log URL: = http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p545731_s364466/log= s/piewm-1.04_4.log >> Build URL: = http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=3Dhead-amd64-default&= build=3Dp545731_s364466 >> ... >> --- piewm --- >> rm -f piewm >> cc -o piewm -L/usr/local/lib gram.o lex.o deftwmrc.o = add_window.o gc.o list.o twm.o parse.o menus.o events.o = resize.o util.o version.o iconmgr.o cursor.o icons.o vdt.o = move.o LocPixmap.o -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 -lXt -lSM -lICE = -lXext -lXext -lX11 -lm -ll -lXpm -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib >> ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno >>>>> defined at gram.c >>>>> gram.o:(yylineno) >>>>> defined at lex.c >>>>> lex.o:(.data+0x0) >> cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see = invocation) >> *** [piewm] Error code 1 >>=20 >> make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-wm/piewm/work/piewm-1.04 >> 1 error >>=20 >> make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-wm/piewm/work/piewm-1.04 >> =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. >> Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the = failure to >> the maintainer. >> *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop. >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/x11-wm/piewm >=20 > So... I confess a lack of familiarity with lex, yacc, and their > work-alikes. It also appears that x11-wm/tvtwm (for which MAINTAINER = is > this list -- ports@FreeBSD.org) is likely similarly affected. >=20 > I understand that the immediate cause is a recent change; in > = http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B7F9F85B-60A4-4A87-9911-BDE1CBC7BC91, > dim@ mentioned: >=20 > | This is because clang 11 (and gcc 10) now default to -fno-common. = The > | rationale is explained pretty well in... >=20 > and goes on to state: > | A quick fix is to add CFLAGS+=3D-fcommon to your make.conf, but that = is > | rather a big hammer. It is better to add it to just the ports that = show > | problems due to duplicated symbols. And ideally, those duplicated > | symbols should be patched out of the ports. >=20 > So: apparently *a* way around this is to change the Makefile (to > include 'CFLAGS+=3D-fcommon') -- but I don't know if a "better" = approach > is feasible: we are dealing with some rather old (or, perhaps, > "well-established") code, here. >=20 > Advice/suggestions? In this case, "svn rm x11-wm/piewm/files/patch-gram.y" will fix it correctly. I have no idea why that patch was added in the first place, it is clearly incorrect! -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_6E5DD83D-FDDA-4E88-B9AC-39870C298215 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCX0N2QQAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o3A/AJ9wbb6x0dTwi/lck/O6LODPsBo48QCg0aOomV9c1rB3aFv67u8I1j0YjUw= =YFQO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_6E5DD83D-FDDA-4E88-B9AC-39870C298215-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 10:58:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6162C3B9E58 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BZpyk4zvNz4ZDL; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07OAwlLZ014465; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:58:47 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 07OAwltA014464; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 03:58:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 03:58:47 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Dimitry Andric Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: x11-wm/piewm: "ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno" Message-ID: <20200824105847.GD5141@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20200823193504.GB5141@albert.catwhisker.org> <2D642C38-96C6-4736-88E1-C1B56783C701@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2D642C38-96C6-4736-88E1-C1B56783C701@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BZpyk4zvNz4ZDL X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:58:55 -0000 --SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:11:45AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > .... > > Advice/suggestions? >=20 > In this case, "svn rm x11-wm/piewm/files/patch-gram.y" will fix it > correctly. I have no idea why that patch was added in the first place, > it is clearly incorrect! >=20 > -Dimitry >=20 Thank you very much! I will verify that and send in a correct fix once I do. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "Those countries that have lost control of the virus like the United States are seeing economic forecasts constantly revised down and are weaker economically." -- Dominick Stephens, Westpac NZ's chief economist See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl9DnWZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PckqwQf+KdyQKeIMjHvN2NL6HfowVd3TBK/HIGXjMf3+oSG606UGLvhoHJKMEc8r 3EBjzepHxXEi7xVGRrZrJgUlFUlpaknAHHB0bCZkr1PDHNraEgOIyQyIGNFU63GH TdETlCB+JtTjSyp4zuLqRHaenxGIn7k25C1TispEQKXUfVSzhTQ42Ln5scC2/Qcw 9z2RJ+lE6okju6AvzXDKfHVrKV7tCTb7RjebWfijTLK/0i4HmCAl6f5QTHJHFGWX NeI/lpcUcepmeoJ0Tn78C8lYFca414By6ibIOCQb5UPTsmiwZoi5beiGFEZYEWNI o5HKCg59oW8WOMHVzG+0kq8uBwJqRg== =VAUJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 22:21:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA943CF13A for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bb66q2Cqsz4LcB for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4A6CA3CF062; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D7E3CF139; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bb66q0XDLz4LsP; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bb66k3dfPz3mrC; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id REsXKiYTLvVS; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1201:747b:31ec:1f2a:4364]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Bb65q42Y6z3mwR; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:03 +0000 (UTC) To: current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: x11@FreeBSD.org From: Niclas Zeising Subject: deprecation of drm-legacy-kmod Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:21:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bb66q0XDLz4LsP X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:21:55 -0000 [ cross posted across several mailing lists, please respect reply-to ] Hi! It is time to deprecate drm-legacy-kmod, since it is taking too much time to maintain and are holding off changes in other areas. drm-legacy-kmod was created to aid in the transition to the LinuxKPI based graphics drivers, at a time when the new drivers only supported amd64. Since then, the new drivers have been updated to support more architectures and more GPUs, and the burden of maintaining drm-legacy-kmod has increased. It became apparent with the update of xorg-server to 1.20 that drm-legacy-kmod is too old to work with certain aspects of the graphics stack, and it is also holding back changes in areas of the FreeBSD base system such as VM scaling and optimization. The VM locking protocol needs to be changed, and to port those changes to these drivers would require extensive reworking of its use of the FreeBSD VM subsystem. This means it is time for it to go. The driver will remain for a transition period. For FreeBSD 13-CURRENT, this will be fairly short, as there are changes to FreeBSD base that breaks the drivers. For FreeBSD 12, the driver will remain a bit longer, to ease in transition. On FreeBSD 12, there is also the option of using the graphics drivers in base, although those are supported on a best-effort basis only. Regards -- Niclas Zeising FreeBSD Graphics Team From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 22:32:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA433CF987 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bb6MV71ZNz4MZd for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07OMWe0U088630 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:32:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: George Mitchell Autocrypt: addr=george+freebsd@m5p.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFgnLnwBEADAJDiBKQX77LFRz9wZW8mz3KvaQol2nIremcws0F1mz/zgFlk6uhQVtwnL wb4XL5LdFwcNE1+QZzPLcbYWoWQlz0lBw1bMuKAgr0S6V2e0+I0DqhKeslVFctcTwtvT6pnK VLZXO/7ZGAaLzG4K5vSPzgoevU+YI/pxNsVCH2UO/c3jQW63uEt25mIZbCF1Pu4jgp4RhIgF ujn877r/j6OwBwjzRUu3E6ADp+U825d+5YCuQMEH0wIPnn9GTpXvfdKdbwOIl2akqXqs4cnk iATWfK3r6D4mvDEj1OPHlTvJYcfic7aOIiAwmx1C1v78GjXOdOOA0SGffNix3C2/8oZUO1+V Aet4MKpUKkduWSvULhIkHNZ5Nu8SIJOqge8pmtHxuNXAMfMrAjMdjPwwBFLsYg3Xa2E2oJwg ehTauwd/EDJFcVCyDCyCAYOi/BH/+XQyxzgDlY9N9qj9tHqhVPI6XK7t8UVffGiZUq4rHp5J RdOToqiTNC6eCJBczhMIW+DuFvWU9e6W708T1dz0Accn6Lrgk4eRIn3GFPBG+TxnpjAqHsbW 607dcnD3YKAqY4e+khczL4EObhe7dC1v2fmZiAC6Ds3WHR11IfqoUgCkIwJ590Ej+ElygJFF XxI82wtEz9hkeLLvItpyEJNVjppViRW+Dgl/U7ypHB3qDgYjgwARAQABtChHZW9yZ2UgTWl0 Y2hlbGwgPGdlb3JnZStmcmVlYnNkQG01cC5jb20+iQJUBBMBCAA+FiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZX wRES3m+p4fkFAlhZcR0CGyMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQwRES 3m+p4flqmw/9Emr/ydTG2n9o/IX1yVCNcHVFenVrcOY0L+DGQYZRO/XpLvsGYcuSIQId1w7h l4HZKI89ri2fF2ks6upMqBajLf8s7a8PnYrbw5bPaoOFyNTjv57GLZVsYw95kmMUpK6siuAA fXvHfKUpC/sThbwSv/1CLryVG74+5vdI8j7cQeDM436FThxlVfHKrILIiL34D4WThFB3hV/Y 2A+mQwXmdLcuQXXeAazqsFJL8sgEKSC7GMcExDkVpGc5Rh2hu97a4Sa7qWX9G/YdZOrcDacJ XxfvePn3m3WfRtXN/r0lUfiVXiqkFfbvqSaZQ0I4UvZXNGd/gH4jKHtX9RTH9G96UZeHNoMo tPw9U0fx8Ceh72nUL9qzqnmok/ryWm+6gt4Q1eRP7QAosOa1g/RgUdS1Z9IuCmbXMDp5kbNw L4ZoDMF5U3mmh8/IOKkhGopNLbNv0mwUgC59pnCptiOVx8DyckXWC4L2r6PKbWGrcGIzsUER 9smfL10gpp5H5agjwwPZI6/kzJ0R5nBzQWAlwqI73YAy6JI0HTD6lvxW7yWm2fGjEfmyaBOU 8OLUin7auoFSn+QmD5yNCUn5Ls77qHARkT1ZGocAnQkvZBGTwXpvyJixygXsm+vSUFDYBOSn cR54vdXOEMqrJk6SGau5YI9V7EhQVveE1BUp8ofWf2oo4RG5Ag0EWCcufAEQALuTOxmqMFE+ ieev/rcL3wVJrcuKS+pBbKCY9IIL0OwVf98HQJJcgdOsdDhruVd19nJNlwZ3Fc34wLw7y2GO 9WrpZiYKnI4n9urhLE5r1ydBInlI/1UKZWgM3/dPjJtcXMsC3vnqR9DmOxW4/SbqJDjP3XzO FleT4yip3AaNhPGwEPTZrubVp5hp/JojaZn690TLRwOFXg8NcjpOEs0Bq9M+OLpmsF0flrgs yDfS7y+SQ17R4Iq9T7RxZvZVAh510yGGIZIETYO/4Dh417VVm+gaksOVh2egetpUUvYYc0Ub KaP+5F/WGNrmRb1F6SKypvLlKkYAHCsUUSzsAGl9gbQhEEpuOMbUKp1979HoRMkW+8046kIo 8BZ6ph8izG/g4dZOaEqKGEhqdhYIB7UwMtFFuPtSs5Nl6JrZYni/nzFtTmtVCgcj9PNqrzqt fNFYhNznD6St6wxp3TOm9D3TQF0dzwBM1jZpb8WvmK3k6oy8hbpjiBzxn3kyRA9Vzy+PdbN/ G5a1k0rpZu/ivpBuLCDVGljUmgQigXg6xkk5UxBoHp7MPvG9prZ5jqdEa2r1KgnGjaq+VJsu Uqrw10dVgeG1NulDU1+sQl+/mwtflbkimhjDDjxsVgfrv7uvV/9be+gGm1KATuqdgCboSb1s QAo5ARfwFfChrnh+fTfPpPKHABEBAAGJAiQEGAEIAA8FAlgnLnwCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQwRES 3m+p4fno9w/4m+swztkzxSWdutjgSv2mw+PdrKWVGFAUD2HoY1Qpi5LNLE6s9pP3qzwpQYwK viOufVJYWZ540ss6BImZBGJwyHouacqrpZjpRo5+ftj07rY1SNd8QjcHDggPfpgJ1D4Il3Xi vRg5/gzkXnRu8dXeVvMP1Ndk/F5wcoLZlQwFtPfu2xyRYIsveXMoyypAvAFSaAGXU0hRzuDJ fGI3LFvpI9UXU2C4MMzjfyZyD2NJEDKOACTo85QQzxgheTDQaDocXW00wknXFMwEItiXp8dO 2zEml/3Kj4efDfjqGpjNefjK0cnj02Byt7y6GozWXyIylrXu0SN9qWRzUVZH3+q+ijA4q3Gm 9uWzLdpjN4QWAiiaEvMhLPohp9DdLsy3kAWWrA3+pAfHSTZXrobMMbSeBkE9E4/WxdKl0nM7 TNslAWcxkTd/7Ly9cxwT8wFdHuQB1hgCmIQxDNXHL1N1ANTeUYum1w9nUg6e1M0UWu+nk3Cw qL7oL2KZe13mQnU/CFwlhbf+i//j3SXrQLlIVQv9Fn805bxIcVo9yqUZyoiV7EUpvOsxDCZh ej3mNYF5nRCf6trEJQVk0aLC26zJAYExykdUlRqc4I13XPhlt+aFSMMkoL/thYO6e9oNFK6Q aJEKXomzxxqpceJVmPH6zvqJbOboAdE/mOD0PoS1M6saIQ== Subject: Re: deprecation of drm-legacy-kmod Message-ID: <82a5b9c8-b331-1cb9-7bcd-8525dcb345bf@m5p.com> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:32:33 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xntuu9ESLoh3rNPfFtbpE08mL5IsRrUDb" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP, HELO_NO_DOMAIN, NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bb6MV71ZNz4MZd X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.31 / 15.00]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.12)[0.122]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.030]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:32:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xntuu9ESLoh3rNPfFtbpE08mL5IsRrUDb Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="99OJUT16iUZccTS7wXABiJ0wy5jgDASKp"; protected-headers="v1" From: George Mitchell To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <82a5b9c8-b331-1cb9-7bcd-8525dcb345bf@m5p.com> Subject: Re: deprecation of drm-legacy-kmod References: In-Reply-To: --99OJUT16iUZccTS7wXABiJ0wy5jgDASKp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-08-24 18:21, Niclas Zeising wrote: > [ cross posted across several mailing lists, please respect reply-to ] >=20 > Hi! >=20 > It is time to deprecate drm-legacy-kmod [...] it is time for it to go. >=20 > The driver will remain for a transition period.=C2=A0 For FreeBSD 13-CU= RRENT, > this will be fairly short, as there are changes to FreeBSD base that > breaks the drivers.=C2=A0 For FreeBSD 12, the driver will remain a bit > longer, to ease in transition.=C2=A0 On FreeBSD 12, there is also the o= ption > of using the graphics drivers in base, although those are supported on = a > best-effort basis only. [...] My secret decoder ring is telling me the implicit message here (along with a recent Qt5 "upgrade") is that the FreeBSD home page explicit statement that the 11.3 and 11.4 releases of FreeBSD are in production status is a bit of a lie. I know I'm going to have to upgrade to 12 sooner or later, but I just don't have a warm, fuzzy feeling about that right now. Forgive me for venting ... -- George --99OJUT16iUZccTS7wXABiJ0wy5jgDASKp-- --xntuu9ESLoh3rNPfFtbpE08mL5IsRrUDb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZXwRES3m+p4fkFAl9EQAgACgkQwRES3m+p 4fnwqA//fmuGrmuMVwW4vnrLsg6+PDOFlgy+SMTDrTz3iGNUY/JHOXh6yZg4TUpY j8I+fVBF43D6uPuxAmm3D6GI0EAw3fnjYkqIujqOtGk+neACd0G5H3YDewMSoZe8 R2pn2E5j2vybYITq250jdn62c7glDh+mpGsgYUpZykMucmR5FmiY3c2HH8FzbOzv hZrzuPBdSQHvcN213ZlZB6wtOluafeTXXG5dNWiP/mau+s1B6Al0z7qkhT56NlZx eH34uNKmClsjygB6RBwCIdvx8GzSZ56QKLlUpRO2RG5hGaDALmmIYAzgjswcuL6G wRUQSUdAOqqq5U9DvCCRVBlsTJqlrK0fMd5s8HC4c5gkBA+B4hrdLI7ge4hEhGtA B8qodAipd+CfYNGYZQ3WJLpuZmDn/jizX0NkqI+5KGArs5yId3TXy+n4qqZ460KN WKQlHC4KJfzQ1mZikDQMC0fibpDmi9uoo8/ksPBcq8Er3dvpwL9IUnG5Wvz0i7Fj UBWRQcAV/AjgZSn0h0fm0bQHTDDiEUGB0CyFpe3o88LZZmBIx1TXdDDNsHRMR7ga dm6H9IsDgudJf6y7eW686kG5VJiVe0jzK+cHBHiPvb7OCPMok3ce0v6RkFuthtvb 5oQfb/oYjtFW9DyljDAG7Oo+Q2JzjuTo5BqYKcb9/95m799LGSo= =kf1n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xntuu9ESLoh3rNPfFtbpE08mL5IsRrUDb-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 01:49:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F77D3B4A2A for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 01:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from figosdev@protonmail.com) Received: from mail-40140.protonmail.ch (mail-40140.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbBkt22yTz4Z8y for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 01:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from figosdev@protonmail.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 01:49:48 +0000 To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" From: figosdev Reply-To: figosdev Subject: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbBkt22yTz4Z8y X-Spamd-Bar: +++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.02 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[figosdev@protonmail.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT_BOGUS(1.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protonmail.com,quarantine]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protonmail.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.63)[0.628]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; HAS_PHPMAILER_SIG(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.30)[0.295]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; AUTOGEN_PHP_SPAMMY(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.70.40.140:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[185.70.40.140:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 01:49:59 -0000 SGksIEknbSBuZXcgdG8gRnJlZUJTRC0tIEkgaW5zdGFsbGVkIGl0IGZvciB0aGUgZmlyc3QgdGlt ZSB0aGlzIHdlZWsuIEhvbmVzdGx5LCBzbyBmYXIgaXQgaGFzIGV4Y2VlZGVkIGV4cGVjdGF0aW9u cy4KCkkgaW5zdGFsbGVkIFgxMSwgYnV0IHRoZSBmaXJzdCB0aGluZyBJIGluc3RhbGxlZCB3YXMg UHlQeTIuCgpVbmxpa2UgQ1B5dGhvbjIsIHdoaWNoIGlzIEVPTCdkLCBQeVB5MiBkb2VzIG5vdCB0 byB0aGUgYmVzdCBvZiBteSBrbm93bGVkZ2UgZGVwZW5kIG9uIENQeXRob24uIFdoZW4gSSBpbnN0 YWxsZWQgaXQgd2l0aCBwa2csIGl0IHNhaWQgdGhlIHBvcnQgd2FzIGRlcHJlY2F0ZWQgYW5kIHdp bGwgYmUgcmVtb3ZlZCBmcm9tIHBvcnRzIHNvb24tLSBidXQgaXQgYWxzbyBzYWlkIGl0IHdhcyBi YXNlZCBvbiBQeXRob24gMi43ICh3aGljaCBpcyBFT0xkKS4KCkkgdGhpbmsgdGhlcmUgaXMgYSBt aXN1bmRlcnN0YW5kaW5nIHRoZXJlLiBQeVB5IHN0YXRlcyB0aGUgaW50ZW50aW9uIHRvIGNvbnRp bnVlIHRvIG1haW50YWluIHRoYXQgdmVyc2lvbi4KClJlbW92aW5nIHRoaXMgcG9ydCBpcyB1bm5l Y2Vzc2FyeS4gQXdhcmUgb2YgdGhlIHBvbGl0aWNzIGFyb3VuZCB0aGlzICh3aGljaCBnbyB3YXkg b3ZlciBGcmVlQlNEIGFueXdheSkgSSBkb3VidCBJIHdpbGwgY29udmluY2Ugc29tZW9uZSB0byBz YXZlIHRoaXMgcG9ydCwgc2FkbHkuCgpJJ3ZlIHVzZWQgYm90aCBQeXRob24gMi54IGFuZCAzLngg Zm9yIHllYXJzIG5vdy4gSWYgdGhpcyBwcm9ibGVtIGNhbid0IGJlIGZpeGVkLCBjYW4gSSBhdCBs ZWFzdCBiZSBwdXQgaW4gdG91Y2ggd2l0aCB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBwb3J0IG1haW50YWluZXIgc28g dGhhdCBJIGNhbiBsZWFybiBob3cgdG8gbWFpbnRhaW4gdGhpcyBhcyBhIDNyZCBwYXJ0eSBwYWNr YWdlIGZvciBteSBvd24gdXNlPwoKSSdtIGNlcnRhaW4gSSdtIG5vdCB1cCB0byBiZWNvbWluZyBh biBvZmZpY2lhbCBwb3J0IG1haW50YWluZXIgYXQgdGhpcyBzdGFnZSwgYnV0IEknZCBsaWtlIHRv IGJlIGFibGUgdG8gYXQgbGVhc3QgY29tcGlsZSBhbmQgcnVuIFB5UHkyIG9uIGZyZWVic2Qgd2l0 aG91dCByZWRvaW5nIHRoZSBwb3J0cyB3b3JrIHRoYXQgd2FzIGFscmVhZHkgZG9uZSBvbiB0aGlz Lg== From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 03:05:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7513B8BFE for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbDQD38ztz3S5p for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 5so6409418otp.12 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DijjLSoMYIZJNXUd+PnfjqJSEQmFTiMmfKs5uDNOS+8=; b=AM/JoHe23VBPMeXOAuWgLzHhoVePcaEMXsfW8KsXChtbHnVMszsLr3ws0ZwqznLZ/R 02rJc7QozSr2dx4bsDRm6jwCC/cy6mA3WDEXwKygcPO4OptidyWZbDx6avOgDEmdbZmD MEqasMLLWk1RbXvx1xYRWzFnaiOGywfo2LMGVFCgwYOBJzDz11fUesHhv4ZVftRDGm7f Wdc3sRkiUdNjHft4dF0DzYRaZQeaVSA7XJ4QHBfJuOao14AhR8KZdfAh9p0VIztTu90G vxjxt8Xz28QoA3rhQ2CUWIl2lw+/vYoYV88sfNBhBoF3MA/xqQawJ0kshsOOmqCSfaMf VgBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DijjLSoMYIZJNXUd+PnfjqJSEQmFTiMmfKs5uDNOS+8=; b=MItSa3Y/C6qDa1bl2/3t+fkLObPvf7AGMeEI/321xTnjH97EjSr1Emdq8v8GmRXMer VTca5FL6coEvxy8jphYAvoFbgPJrzF3McqKBPa5wYHJf0s8hgqVqVIjPZjNltNLjw91Y CDvcZNSBxHEZDx6Yk2uYDG9+G2lQnu34FK2ydoiOS8r/YePDfV1AmN2rIaVQJB0j2PYy /3oZxqTjZehwH7DBGxDvvQTV3YyYGmP6SeNPxsiY9PBOsx4pxMF3ZmNDDfg/f5iiYtlD J6z4nzbex4wEqoyxZu8mLPseJ6ZGthTKNuMP+Mj+EMh8mC+Jfh5RwYPPaY5dNQWm5iRT LD6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vDwaeJN0udW5Hl2KYaonzcK4QvUSY+uxc/6EhpCwkjpZXbbLq ddEFDLvlc2Gp8ZKfvQoenP8jLz3WR5L1A6jK2x8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKQJ13iMvsRW1cMWrQeenzomtc+Q0Dyr5XFLdsQRKW2lC2Rh5CHgpDlse/D9e41MHPwIM4ZdQZgS0MybwpChg= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:ea5:: with SMTP id 34mr5780811otj.199.1598324738842; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:05:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Oberman Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:05:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? To: figosdev Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbDQD38ztz3S5p X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AM/JoHe2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.39 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.30)[0.295]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::333:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:05:42 -0000 On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 6:50 PM figosdev via freebsd-ports < freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, I'm new to FreeBSD-- I installed it for the first time this week. > Honestly, so far it has exceeded expectations. > > I installed X11, but the first thing I installed was PyPy2. > > Unlike CPython2, which is EOL'd, PyPy2 does not to the best of my > knowledge depend on CPython. When I installed it with pkg, it said the port > was deprecated and will be removed from ports soon-- but it also said it > was based on Python 2.7 (which is EOLd). > > I think there is a misunderstanding there. PyPy states the intention to > continue to maintain that version. > > Removing this port is unnecessary. Aware of the politics around this > (which go way over FreeBSD anyway) I doubt I will convince someone to save > this port, sadly. > > I've used both Python 2.x and 3.x for years now. If this problem can't be > fixed, can I at least be put in touch with the current port maintainer so > that I can learn how to maintain this as a 3rd party package for my own use? > > I'm certain I'm not up to becoming an official port maintainer at this > stage, but I'd like to be able to at least compile and run PyPy2 on freebsd > without redoing the ports work that was already done on this. > Looks like the deprecation might have been in error. While I can't be sure, it looks like it is in no way dependent on python27 and, if it is maintained, it probably was deprecated in error. Probably someone in the python group saw the 2.7 references and tagged it for deprecation. You probably should start by contacting python@ and, if there is no response, open a ticket on bugzilla pointing this out and requesting that the deprecation be reversed. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 04:01:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A193BBDA9 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [174.136.98.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.nomadlogic.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbFfp6hbWz3WQq for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (cpe-23-243-161-111.socal.res.rr.com [23.243.161.111]) by mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 516c2b6d (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? To: Kevin Oberman , figosdev Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: From: Pete Wright Message-ID: <4eef2ee6-6fd1-7383-5031-597ff8a364f1@nomadlogic.org> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:01:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbFfp6hbWz3WQq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pete@nomadlogic.org designates 174.136.98.114 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pete@nomadlogic.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.24 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nomadlogic.org]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[23.243.161.111:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.03)[0.032]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.50)[-0.495]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,protonmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25795, ipnet:174.136.96.0/20, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:01:39 -0000 On 8/24/20 8:05 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 6:50 PM figosdev via freebsd-ports < > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Hi, I'm new to FreeBSD-- I installed it for the first time this week. >> Honestly, so far it has exceeded expectations. >> >> I installed X11, but the first thing I installed was PyPy2. >> >> Unlike CPython2, which is EOL'd, PyPy2 does not to the best of my >> knowledge depend on CPython. When I installed it with pkg, it said the port >> was deprecated and will be removed from ports soon-- but it also said it >> was based on Python 2.7 (which is EOLd). >> >> I think there is a misunderstanding there. PyPy states the intention to >> continue to maintain that version. >> >> Removing this port is unnecessary. Aware of the politics around this >> (which go way over FreeBSD anyway) I doubt I will convince someone to save >> this port, sadly. >> >> I've used both Python 2.x and 3.x for years now. If this problem can't be >> fixed, can I at least be put in touch with the current port maintainer so >> that I can learn how to maintain this as a 3rd party package for my own use? >> >> I'm certain I'm not up to becoming an official port maintainer at this >> stage, but I'd like to be able to at least compile and run PyPy2 on freebsd >> without redoing the ports work that was already done on this. >> > Looks like the deprecation might have been in error. While I can't be sure, > it looks like it is in no way dependent on python27 and, if it is > maintained, it probably was deprecated in error. Probably someone in the > python group saw the 2.7 references and tagged it for deprecation. > > You probably should start by contacting python@ and, if there is no > response, open a ticket on bugzilla pointing this out and requesting that > the deprecation be reversed. i agree - it looks like someone needs to refactor lang/pypy which seems to build against python2.7. there is a pypy3 port/pkg as well, but that seems to be incorrectly flagged as being deprecated according to freshports. i searched bugzilla too but only found an open cleanup ticket there: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245747 -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 04:11:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5373BC278 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from figosdev@protonmail.com) Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch (mail-40141.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbFt108trz3X6G for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from figosdev@protonmail.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:11:17 +0000 From: figosdev Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Reply-To: figosdev Subject: Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4eef2ee6-6fd1-7383-5031-597ff8a364f1@nomadlogic.org> References: <4eef2ee6-6fd1-7383-5031-597ff8a364f1@nomadlogic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_HEADERS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbFt108trz3X6G X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.98 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[figosdev@protonmail.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protonmail.com,quarantine]; MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.11)[-0.110]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protonmail.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.09)[0.089]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.70.40.141:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[185.70.40.141:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 04:11:21 -0000 Thank you both. Per Kevin's advice I have contacted freebsd-python@ and wai= t to hear what they say about this. I am not above getting the PyPy devs on this if necessary. I find it hard t= o believe that an implementation they say will be around hard-depends on an= implementation that will not. The port itself could be another story. PyPy implements Python 2, so they s= hould be able at this point to use PyPy to build PyPy if they don't already= . If I could run the ELF version on FreeBSD I'd take that over nothing, but I= 've meant to try FreeBSD again for years (possibly migrating to it) and I'v= e only read the FAQ and part of the handbook so far. Still learning. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 14:52:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5794E3CE469 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbX5S07qTz4XVt for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaIq-000NPi-G8; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:52:00 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:52:00 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: figosdev Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? Message-ID: <20200825145200.GM3539@home.opsec.eu> References: <4eef2ee6-6fd1-7383-5031-597ff8a364f1@nomadlogic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbX5S07qTz4XVt X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:52:12 -0000 Hi! > I am not above getting the PyPy devs on this if necessary. I find > it hard to believe that an implementation they say will be around > hard-depends on an implementation that will not. I've checked the port itself, and the build of the port depends on python 2.7. Do you think you can tinker around with the port build to see if you can get it to build with python3 ? It looks like a major task, from what I can see in the Makefile. But I'm no python expert 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 15:05:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363BF3CE64B for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BbXPM0lQ6z4Y51 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 199013CE749; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195AE3CE6B5 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbXPL6zWbz4YCY for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D442B92E for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07PF5w3R008623 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:58 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07PF5wJY008622 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:58 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:58 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202008251505.07PF5wJY008622@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:05:59 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/www/gitlab-ce: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/net/rubygem-gitlab-fog-azure-rm Committers on the hook: bapt jbeich madpilot makc manu mfechner osa ume zeising Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U x11-servers/xwayland-devel/Makefile U x11-servers/xwayland-devel/distinfo U mail/cyrus-imapd30/files/patch-Makefile.in A mail/cyrus-imapd32/files/patch-Makefile.in U mail/neomutt/Makefile U mail/neomutt/distinfo U mail/dovecot-fts-xapian/Makefile U mail/dovecot-fts-xapian/distinfo U www/py-crossplane/Makefile U www/py-crossplane/distinfo U www/gitlab-ce/Makefile U www/gitlab-ce/distinfo U www/gitlab-ce/files/patch-Gemfile U www/gitlab-ce/files/patch-config_gitlab.yml.example U www/gitlab-ce/files/patch-config_initializers_1__settings.rb U www/gitlab-ce/pkg-plist U www/rubygem-browser/Makefile U www/rubygem-browser/distinfo U www/gitlab-workhorse/Makefile U www/gitlab-workhorse/distinfo U www/gitlab-pages/Makefile U www/gitlab-pages/distinfo U comms/smstools3/Makefile A net/remmina/files A net/remmina/files/patch-27f84d1c.c U net/rubygem-gitaly/Makefile U net/rubygem-gitaly/distinfo U net/rubygem-uri_template/Makefile U games/stendhal/Makefile U games/stendhal/distinfo U games/stendhal/pkg-plist U security/vuxml/vuln.xml U textproc/gitlab-elasticsearch-indexer/Makefile U textproc/gitlab-elasticsearch-indexer/distinfo U textproc/lowdown/Makefile U textproc/lowdown/distinfo U devel/rubygem-prometheus-client-mmap/Makefile U devel/rubygem-prometheus-client-mmap/distinfo U devel/rubygem-health_check/Makefile U devel/gitlab-shell/Makefile U devel/gitlab-shell/distinfo U devel/gitlab-shell/pkg-plist U devel/gitaly/Makefile U devel/gitaly/distinfo D devel/gitaly/files/patch-mr2407 U devel/gitaly/files/patch-Makefile U devel/gitaly/files/patch-ruby_Gemfile U devel/rubygem-ecma-re-validator/Makefile U devel/rubygem-hana/Makefile U audio/gonic/Makefile U audio/gonic/distinfo U math/libxls/Makefile U math/libxls/distinfo U math/libxls/pkg-plist U math/libxlsxwriter/Makefile U math/libxlsxwriter/distinfo A print/transfig/files/patch-fig2dev_dev_gengbx.c A print/transfig/files/patch-fig2dev_dev_genps.c U print/transfig/files/patch-fig2dev_fig2dev.h D sysutils/dtc/files U sysutils/dtc/Makefile U sysutils/dtc/distinfo U sysutils/dtc/pkg-plist Updated to revision 546184. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 18:06:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EBD3B44BE for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BbcP55NsFz3YQC for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B90803B44BD; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D553B4360 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbcP54Vjtz3YSM for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648832DF89 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07PI61ti071698 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07PI61c7071696 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202008251806.07PI61c7071696@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:06:01 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 20:49:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9582E3BB700 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bbh1m5Pk6z46XW; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id x7so106515wro.3; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:49:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mpoIyId0Y+zBcr+S6ngOsM/ZkE0qaVjGLXRSB50xRRI=; b=ObuJQnr1Een4sjzRg+VzJtK7UYwsqxWYjjCd72xs5P8PylzLJkQUY65SxYeUi3QAfw RXT9omgaFcNncmXzLhTyer2kTRHMXPlurwP/PTRjl0oHRFSYaBatHr88yBDtGJ14VuKi LHmBlSCLS1o+O1mhWyMLgMef61v/C5+ZhPpLyP72ypvtJeAtiDromM286vmDOnmsfiou dp2tXl83aXhE7/Hjxv2MtAwi1bCCNF7g6zpwIzQhlZKfjeXPhIOCu2FZeT/3MagEdKfe v3pQEqOdp65jW/Q4tEI0XziOyS1jJZt4G0atPEQYQUFBPa0heOsd9I1M6H5KMt9WikGj HhWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mpoIyId0Y+zBcr+S6ngOsM/ZkE0qaVjGLXRSB50xRRI=; b=q6GwCKJqpfha1SDviPpq3aKhC+KFyQMWu200f+tiCkZrz7BJwxIKSEnPp9PnwHHf+d oWX4ej7GQZVhPpMds56JG6Y7ts8VTSMi9P4CgsB6HQVbCGB2Eizz2xZxkNbMvjDOUN/j L7lXtzjBuwVeGXTu82NHGWqlmdIOAnrWI/et06rQzTfvMPHO26AwcLwM+LUUBwmt6aON 4MKfkeVo/8iuH2VJ2prNkJ907yWe1Bq6srhSj7zMLzfnoIuDsZF5nat1b9egjdDTL8Jb jVcXKGcYIGNjtGICfVKXDPykuzrv9SEjk/HB/+NZTekLO/LTvin6jv7rnTDQl2pXw0aZ pMbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53000IN6r9Ba1/QP9WCA8xbnMD19sesY6H+xkNM6BaC6kABf19n1 ytR8c6Df8jJl42wgpgsVPHaU9AaXdszVVOo6nbYpt2c4Xvo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysVqBpMl0lIZTsjX3KEnStJGHmI6T08PXMFoahAuAJlFIW6fBAGHBtkwBzINlXbt/Xh2o9oJh9BvXbyS5yMII= X-Received: by 2002:adf:90d1:: with SMTP id i75mr11786128wri.278.1598388571009; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:49:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9zw6kgR2FyY8OtYSBKdWFuaW5v?= Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:49:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: lang/php72: last changelog references to wrong version, please update to 7.2.33 To: ports Cc: tz@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bbh1m5Pk6z46XW X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ObuJQnr1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jjuanino@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::430 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jjuanino@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.85 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.66)[-0.659]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.14)[0.139]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::430:from]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.67)[subject]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:49:33 -0000 Hi all, I am inspecting the last update in lang/php72 port (https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=545454), and the changelog shows the following: lang/php72: Update from 7.2.22 to 7.2.23 Changelog: Core: Fixed bug #79877 (getimagesize function silently truncates after a null byte) (cmb) Phar: Fixed bug #79797 (Use of freed hash key in the phar_parse_zipfile function). (CVE-2020-7068) Unless I am misunderstanding something, it seems to be wrong: that changelog references to 7.2.33 update instead of the 7.2.23 one, and on the other hand in the Makefile also references the wrong version 7.2.32. In short, I think what needs to be done is to update the port to the 7.2.33 version to cover CVE-2020-7068. Regards From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 21:02:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7493BBB3B for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au) Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au [203.41.22.115]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2560 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au", Issuer "Heuristic Systems Type 4 Host CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbhJH4tMmz47bQ for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au) Received: from [10.0.5.3] (noddy.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07PKwK11017908 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:58:21 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=heuristicsystems.com.au; s=hsa; t=1598389107; x=1598993908; bh=6BP3CteR8oHxXuywEYZgB3GIqUFFoz6S0n+MA6mGU+U=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date; b=Q4U9ixb5AtFCiiUhpNlhNeI/pgp+Xs0vWl+uJ2comOPtbWThFnwTpyJFumwROPj76 hZhf51MtLWPsoYk6lkv8h+PjgB1qIFL+4VKb/LrrTnmxRtW0bG98+kb5pi9gLukrCB exxruIiaRzQDdsHPQDHJjluX+AC32s/IJkWBafrv+KhndSg2bBnrc X-Authentication-Warning: b3.hs: Host noddy.hs [10.0.5.3] claimed to be [10.0.5.3] Subject: Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? To: figosdev , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: From: Dewayne Geraghty Autocrypt: addr=dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQFNBFbOsVMBCgDfvi2PspSwoMEtFhF+aFLQKtzSA9f0dhDqthKHESdfbqxvKzhkBjvTJ5Na EgjKoKfoQTh5xuIv3HLhtDo5PeasPgQl9cPJeriqmqlS+UhY5BGYcMc1AO/TX0fsDaQz96ko at3RUW7sff/qPgVzSurk+DV5h866gPdn5Jdjohyl2F1rzRl6dnaAIyg49zlwZOnPHJGKye+B meqUCnPRglhkpNqXR3v1ulbWpfwhdNDvWT82qTG/qsFy/agjJvxwLuEBeoGc1dPWasO8Nztt 0dqf1Lpeg6SX2yJd76WVS4znt88OEbx/QL2PTJ/YtSepS68WaeKuARKPukkU+QXDep0gaLPl /TvU5xAZndNB3rYnpmoLb32pDHlrJbZUVyTMqc3J2EYM6aaizCpg4VEvVpVSqUT4D9MuREhu PeZ3SvEazQARAQABiQF3BB8BCAAhBQJWzrFTFwyAAWHe5yZt8RJL0vaU1MfDto5dBmeFAgcA AAoJEJVk7a1LmFrdy2QJ/AysDdFIMCRiaqEellprZQyEz5I/qZJEi6yRfXH813hhISFz6moh urZYLQ9SRdyMntT8W3Oc4pJc9fF9RSnY0SSQY/arZbrvsv6hKb1KtIK7P5mLS914J9buxEcJ SWeVuOuMA9aCNqg5uMu19pH5pXayORfbv+K7vFPiyllZ64ShUWZJL69vAc/TsbvMrGtG1M4P qyWCOKEiUT93zhVGQoA0aUYjMAZoyvozZCuieo4O8hkPgMz9lka+3bqQBSOB+qO4Iz+CZs0k Lw7Soga6bRqLK86DH99WjTA6Oj1r8Won+j4V9fnTDCVJoSyqdVHLySDv/lHaNu4Ia4AO4i2d shmLw03gOUvoWLJx5X01A5Zio4FvecnpZqQ0Wz5Ph9MiK3lwarfjonTOLeNGd5BpdnHu5VRC fJml7uAYeyKsD8C4tEBEZXdheW5lIEdlcmFnaHR5IDxkZXdheW5lLmdlcmFnaHR5QGNvbnNj aXVtaW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbC5jb20uYXU+iQGXBBMBCABBAhshCwsKDQkIDAcLAwIECBUKCQgL AwIBBRYDAgEAAh4BAheAFiEEC8bIxjMx+sDl4ZCClWTtrUuYWt0FAl5UUOgACgkQlWTtrUuY Wt3xZAn/W/mq5nDhLIfqxVM9GbU8rGzNsGLfnt5NCVcWlBKhgxOOw9EWkcRTMymwX9OMqwxI +te6Gvy7rG53T2xprtsQyqESZmjWcUSEPsQ9hjw4VZCL15ftBeZMYyO2T1e41UImXAlftleT 2kXCktgyAfwfCzHhFiZM8k9QMFQV1x+JukJ9xPFBgICRLsLsVNVw/R1L7KqARuws4HqXxY1J SCpO+FB4b6tWSIRKbzlb6tctdKppKbG/adVYuoK61ngvmsAzy/9OLhF8u1MNCgyFd2woOErh /zyuap8KvJZMlwAIqpjsoHyXsa0cq8A/uNQSmodwBpRsEGXCmZIZq2FJw6N+38to8C8m97q0 YWrY63VsoA6hA4A4/ywzE3EiwGvqJQBMRv2ET3TIdTyLoEIwXq2bDPU7XTZGh5UZEsKFMHH5 228= Message-ID: <470fc9d4-40e7-be12-f904-31f305f77813@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:58:42 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbhJH4tMmz47bQ X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=heuristicsystems.com.au header.s=hsa header.b=Q4U9ixb5; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au designates 203.41.22.115 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.27 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.04)[0.037]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au:s=hsa]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.26)[-0.263]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[203.41.22.115:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au:-]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.40.0.0/13, country:AU]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:02:09 -0000 On 25/08/2020 11:49 am, figosdev via freebsd-ports wrote: > Hi, I'm new to FreeBSD-- I installed it for the first time this week. Honestly, so far it has exceeded expectations. > > I installed X11, but the first thing I installed was PyPy2. > > Unlike CPython2, which is EOL'd, PyPy2 does not to the best of my knowledge depend on CPython. When I installed it with pkg, it said the port was deprecated and will be removed from ports soon-- but it also said it was based on Python 2.7 (which is EOLd). > > I think there is a misunderstanding there. PyPy states the intention to continue to maintain that version. > > Removing this port is unnecessary. Aware of the politics around this (which go way over FreeBSD anyway) I doubt I will convince someone to save this port, sadly. > > I've used both Python 2.x and 3.x for years now. If this problem can't be fixed, can I at least be put in touch with the current port maintainer so that I can learn how to maintain this as a 3rd party package for my own use? > > I'm certain I'm not up to becoming an official port maintainer at this stage, but I'd like to be able to at least compile and run PyPy2 on freebsd without redoing the ports work that was already done on this. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi figodev, I've had a similar experience. Though in my case security/w3af was removed, per /usr/ports/MOVED:security/w3af||2020-03-31|Has expired: Uses deprecated version of Python So in my case the easiest way, if you build your own ports, is to svnlite update -r '{2020-03-29}' /usr/ports/security/w3af Note the date before removal from the ports tree. You might consider the same action. Though over time you will need to self-maintain... From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 21:12:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFA23BC5CE for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from figosdev@protonmail.com) Received: from mail-40140.protonmail.ch (mail-40140.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbhXP2DNPz49Kn for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from figosdev@protonmail.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:12:24 +0000 To: Dewayne Geraghty From: figosdev Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Reply-To: figosdev Subject: Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <470fc9d4-40e7-be12-f904-31f305f77813@heuristicsystems.com.au> References: <470fc9d4-40e7-be12-f904-31f305f77813@heuristicsystems.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbhXP2DNPz49Kn X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.23 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[figosdev@protonmail.com]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protonmail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.48)[-0.479]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[protonmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.75)[-0.748]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protonmail.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.70.40.140:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[185.70.40.140:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:12:38 -0000 > the easiest way, if you build your own ports, is to svnlite update -r '{2= 020-03-29}' /usr/ports/security/w3af Note the date before removal from the = ports tree. Thanks, this is probably what I was looking for (a way to get a copy of the= existing work if ports deletes it). Forgive my lack of experience here-- does this imply that when something is= "deleted" from ports-- it is like an edit in git or Wikipedia, where the o= ld version still (typically) exists in the tree somewhere? Because if a yea= r from now I can still get the old ports code from the older tree, that's g= ood enough for me. I also got the downloadable Linux ELF pre-compiled version from pypy.org to= run in Linuxulator-- this has me covered for most of the stuff I do with P= ython, though for GUI stuff it doesn't seem to like the libc in /compat or = the one I copied (a point for another list, but for me this solves most of = my issue.) Same GUI stuff runs on the native PyPy. I'm hoping the PyPy devs find a way= to make this work, I intend to ask them if they can make a FreeBSD downloa= d again. They did one for FreeBSD64 a long time ago. Thanks all. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 21:48:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFFB3BD794 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au) Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au [203.41.22.115]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2560 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au", Issuer "Heuristic Systems Type 4 Host CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbjKB4qhyz4DFY for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au) Received: from [10.0.5.3] (noddy.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07PLiUXc048940 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:44:31 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=heuristicsystems.com.au; s=hsa; t=1598391880; x=1598996681; bh=Cto3CPHLmsb7jcYmyA3iuySXW+v6hqN6T1tUyCf4l4w=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Message-ID:Date; b=F08bWEOGyvvsjymIob2q0r4rT+Bd7kLwjXqYrmRgsfu81uthUHFmTcMjCDfJS7ssG aZD5jzBUylILqKtPeKPAqw3YIMrASYyKYppAZ+nG6Bvk4XeUR6AObJ1YGwhAL3Y42G 5PdPjjd3sPo11GXN+m4gGYZMg8H0W0eLor/JOYuEOKL7LQRHbAfv2 X-Authentication-Warning: b3.hs: Host noddy.hs [10.0.5.3] claimed to be [10.0.5.3] Subject: Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port? To: figosdev Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <470fc9d4-40e7-be12-f904-31f305f77813@heuristicsystems.com.au> From: Dewayne Geraghty Autocrypt: addr=dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQFNBFbOsVMBCgDfvi2PspSwoMEtFhF+aFLQKtzSA9f0dhDqthKHESdfbqxvKzhkBjvTJ5Na EgjKoKfoQTh5xuIv3HLhtDo5PeasPgQl9cPJeriqmqlS+UhY5BGYcMc1AO/TX0fsDaQz96ko at3RUW7sff/qPgVzSurk+DV5h866gPdn5Jdjohyl2F1rzRl6dnaAIyg49zlwZOnPHJGKye+B meqUCnPRglhkpNqXR3v1ulbWpfwhdNDvWT82qTG/qsFy/agjJvxwLuEBeoGc1dPWasO8Nztt 0dqf1Lpeg6SX2yJd76WVS4znt88OEbx/QL2PTJ/YtSepS68WaeKuARKPukkU+QXDep0gaLPl /TvU5xAZndNB3rYnpmoLb32pDHlrJbZUVyTMqc3J2EYM6aaizCpg4VEvVpVSqUT4D9MuREhu PeZ3SvEazQARAQABiQF3BB8BCAAhBQJWzrFTFwyAAWHe5yZt8RJL0vaU1MfDto5dBmeFAgcA AAoJEJVk7a1LmFrdy2QJ/AysDdFIMCRiaqEellprZQyEz5I/qZJEi6yRfXH813hhISFz6moh urZYLQ9SRdyMntT8W3Oc4pJc9fF9RSnY0SSQY/arZbrvsv6hKb1KtIK7P5mLS914J9buxEcJ SWeVuOuMA9aCNqg5uMu19pH5pXayORfbv+K7vFPiyllZ64ShUWZJL69vAc/TsbvMrGtG1M4P qyWCOKEiUT93zhVGQoA0aUYjMAZoyvozZCuieo4O8hkPgMz9lka+3bqQBSOB+qO4Iz+CZs0k Lw7Soga6bRqLK86DH99WjTA6Oj1r8Won+j4V9fnTDCVJoSyqdVHLySDv/lHaNu4Ia4AO4i2d shmLw03gOUvoWLJx5X01A5Zio4FvecnpZqQ0Wz5Ph9MiK3lwarfjonTOLeNGd5BpdnHu5VRC fJml7uAYeyKsD8C4tEBEZXdheW5lIEdlcmFnaHR5IDxkZXdheW5lLmdlcmFnaHR5QGNvbnNj aXVtaW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbC5jb20uYXU+iQGXBBMBCABBAhshCwsKDQkIDAcLAwIECBUKCQgL AwIBBRYDAgEAAh4BAheAFiEEC8bIxjMx+sDl4ZCClWTtrUuYWt0FAl5UUOgACgkQlWTtrUuY Wt3xZAn/W/mq5nDhLIfqxVM9GbU8rGzNsGLfnt5NCVcWlBKhgxOOw9EWkcRTMymwX9OMqwxI +te6Gvy7rG53T2xprtsQyqESZmjWcUSEPsQ9hjw4VZCL15ftBeZMYyO2T1e41UImXAlftleT 2kXCktgyAfwfCzHhFiZM8k9QMFQV1x+JukJ9xPFBgICRLsLsVNVw/R1L7KqARuws4HqXxY1J SCpO+FB4b6tWSIRKbzlb6tctdKppKbG/adVYuoK61ngvmsAzy/9OLhF8u1MNCgyFd2woOErh /zyuap8KvJZMlwAIqpjsoHyXsa0cq8A/uNQSmodwBpRsEGXCmZIZq2FJw6N+38to8C8m97q0 YWrY63VsoA6hA4A4/ywzE3EiwGvqJQBMRv2ET3TIdTyLoEIwXq2bDPU7XTZGh5UZEsKFMHH5 228= Message-ID: <42d673a6-8b84-af95-832f-359471a75944@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:44:52 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbjKB4qhyz4DFY X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=heuristicsystems.com.au header.s=hsa header.b=F08bWEOG; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au designates 203.41.22.115 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.77 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[203.41.22.115:from]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.40.0.0/13, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.967]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[heuristicsystems.com.au:s=hsa]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.60)[-0.601]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:48:00 -0000 On 26/08/2020 7:12 am, figosdev via freebsd-ports wrote: >> the easiest way, if you build your own ports, is to svnlite update -r '{2020-03-29}' /usr/ports/security/w3af Note the date before removal from the ports tree. > > Thanks, this is probably what I was looking for (a way to get a copy of the existing work if ports deletes it). > You're welcome :) > Forgive my lack of experience here-- does this imply that when something is "deleted" from ports-- it is like an edit in git or Wikipedia, where the old version still (typically) exists in the tree somewhere? Because if a year from now I can still get the old ports code from the older tree, that's good enough for me. > I can't speak to git or wikipedia, but I use this technique for ports that go back to 2018-12-14. So you should be ok for awhile, perhap a ports infrastructure person can illuminate. Though frankly, I keep copies of all local tree changes against a pristine copy of the ports tree ("diff -urN" is useful) You should be aware that the mailing list(s) has mentioned a move to git, and there is an intention to retain the svn feed, so we should be fine for the foreseeable. Also mentioned was a transition guide... > I also got the downloadable Linux ELF pre-compiled version from pypy.org to run in Linuxulator-- this has me covered for most of the stuff I do with Python, though for GUI stuff it doesn't seem to like the libc in /compat or the one I copied (a point for another list, but for me this solves most of my issue.) > A bit unfortunate that you need to, though its a resilient workaround :) > Same GUI stuff runs on the native PyPy. I'm hoping the PyPy devs find a way to make this work, I intend to ask them if they can make a FreeBSD download again. They did one for FreeBSD64 a long time ago. > Yes, the best way is to try to get the upstream folks to modify their code for python3. Though if the dev doesn't want to, you (we) need to make a calculated risk determination, as I've found with a few very useful applications (ports). And as a general rule, I'd suggest avoiding unmaintained ports that enable inbound network access. Cheerio. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 14:20:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4801E3D61B0 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bc7Lv04Mlz44CJ for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cbfc3127 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=J3W/Xy4NQdKqDeanza6ST cOgEq4=; b=qAlKTuIicJBx/t5D3zX6lZDopRmPqOgJU4+39yh//RQsA/8G+i+QL JPzUsRtnG94POMcFkw3DNGGJaMvMAy7/qWYLulB8BmVP0kwlOLaNWzoaRSrZHASb y2YD5fIzSk0J9wz1gwqnS3JgvXoejqZy8V4XOvmXo0513HLyUGGvEg0fzRveT7Ie lXVfNaBfYMy2MJZxtPUnvvpcUBY6rfN9eH4DBpCUbK4A9uUS0PuGI4S0GzQvB2VR SMGmQB4mwJa30tAQuTGeaF8c92NE1CrLri5WYcpmtM9ioM+VENIl3CKjZTjCX5Lo F+QaYogUaoV+Td5W76Cq8NepP87fBXGPw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=Wr/FqIoZrr5uRKQ fnnaIxEBZ3tNOnTWRN1rG6rXjRsKFk5Tdxqpovziagq7r5n3IY3EsgalBc898VNW opN8a11/HkI9TwfI+/wpYb6rk/u0PiZ9NiR3m15RQT7fs2WzLenRDHJU7/+JAhp8 z9QYbbptAUHx+snfKP46q/c1NeD9fXQ1C2f0wAJIeOc2/3TjzAZaUGtBWCnUCQPY A8/uD4wNX3/K2ItpWRLTYHFAvm2CHRaEoWuxwRvhR0UtHbz7h4Y9RevCkCagHlub b993byalSlaD1CYykLEgJklx4mfC7nY3KkJVp4ie7LdIiKW5yzw7fTlCfc7ipdVU zKCAQoA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a8566470 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:20:41 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bc7Lv04Mlz44CJ X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=qAlKTuIi; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.38 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; URL_IN_SUBJECT(1.00)[www.freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.979]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.87)[-0.871]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.03)[-0.031]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:20:56 -0000 Hi, I maintain at least one port that installs a man page that doesn't show up in https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi. Also, there seem to be cases where man pages of ports are outdated (e.g., https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248927 was opened today, the man page of the port in question was fixed on May 3rd 2020). Is there any documentation explaining how port man pages are generated for man.cgi and how frequently they're updated? Like, are they taken from binary packages every few months or are they maybe created from the ports tree that's current at the time of a release (so "FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE and Ports" contains man pages based on https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/amd64/12.1-RELEASE/ports.txz)? Cheers, Michael -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 14:53:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AFE3D6D2C for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bc84j1kNkz463C for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kAwnq-0000J7-Hb; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:53:30 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:53:30 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Gmelin Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bc84j1kNkz463C X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:53:41 -0000 Hi! > Is there any documentation explaining how port man pages are generated > for man.cgi The man.cgi script itself is in the docs svn repo: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/cgi/man.cgi?revision=54262&view=markup We find that each released version has that version's ports tree. > and how frequently they're updated? Like, are they taken > from binary packages every few months or are they maybe created from the > ports tree that's current at the time of a release (so "FreeBSD > 12.1-RELEASE and Ports" contains man pages based on > https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/amd64/12.1-RELEASE/ports.txz)? Yes, exactly. Any ideas on how man.cgi can be made to also display ports head man pages ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 16:09:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3066B3B04F4 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bc9ly06tFz4DGb; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8e246147; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:09:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=sODKiZF1 HKUT+RlKf00Yr0q3J2M=; b=PE07J3uouGk4QGg+MTgQrH8RVs1U5CmgvfuqnI9U zh+K9oOolEGkRojP4UVW862SOoeQvLxagvrNM7NQLkQPJl3mCkdvLPlDLgWz11ID Lrzzf2SzvWy6TANWLslGj6QbguwKctR6MZxTBklOp2vxm5ECKUq4cYk3/4LXIInl TTHNpOEi7sWhpxq95YbHJuGIh5JVrIoqtVbPyOWgLYRFx7BiWGBzOIas667rbmgx VQCpWb4WfnBRTjAoZTeNiP+esZNPMYehIh+82FT8z+YOjZzWLUl1EFiZrN51LSN7 tD9lZm0lfwNTLypHEU/63lsj+0TH8V6lR1ruXtDTUMpcWw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=no gCkzT2NtZEYbP5x3po8gmE/x6WvwxdYN4QkokwqXbFTP9FMd2nR/84YRUNFsEA3U hZm9ALM6at0tzS7xlPFy5DT4ejgE6x2zDM3BEAFPGXhq1ULKI4q+56McDHH2UO6N XD23yDhnPKAdoedRHrGjL/HDKObAWx9XxYpUz81ZyVnLc5kZscbDsKgQ9QRmUIBL YkDNSGfyt8EZsuT95cUqkdFgwZObOtNiBi+gyKOBSY9VpplGgeOwQ24wZBMTa1S5 l+YzissiCaQ9/yTCUewXgxUurOplgNtvVU2PNnKy8YBC2DZmF/JLEpibXWud0VqD cL/tjJPmwat6cuiPsCiA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c9708df9 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:09:11 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200826180911.6c3303ff@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> References: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bc9ly06tFz4DGb X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=PE07J3uo; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.84 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; URL_IN_SUBJECT(1.00)[www.freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.36)[-0.357]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:09:19 -0000 On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:53:30 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > Is there any documentation explaining how port man pages are > > generated for man.cgi > > The man.cgi script itself is in the docs svn repo: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/cgi/man.cgi?revision=54262&view=markup Thanks. > > We find that each released version has that version's ports tree. > > > and how frequently they're updated? Like, are they taken > > from binary packages every few months or are they maybe created > > from the ports tree that's current at the time of a release (so > > "FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE and Ports" contains man pages based on > > https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/amd64/12.1-RELEASE/ports.txz)? > > > > Yes, exactly. > > Any ideas on how man.cgi can be made to also display ports head man > pages ? One way would be to extract man pages from the binary packages we provide - this would allow to have man pages for head and quarterly branches. This could be implemented as a poudriere feature while building (so it collects man pages as a side effect of bulk builds), or based on the artifacts/binary package produced by poudriere. The former would probably be more elegant and less resource intensive, but also more intrusive. Naive implementation: Get list of man pages: find /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/121amd64-default/All/ \ -name "*.txz" -exec tar -tf {} /usr/local/man 2>/dev/null \; Extract man pages to /tmp/manpages: find /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/121amd64-default/All/ \ -name "*.txz" -exec tar \ -C /tmp/manpages \ --strip-components 4 \ -xf {} \ /usr/local/man 2>/dev/null \; Test if it works: MANPATH=/tmp/manpages man XGrabButton Cheers, Michael -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 16:38:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8373B1BB6 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcBP50y6Mz4GNl; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kAyQp-0003bk-Rf; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:37:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:37:51 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Gmelin Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200826163751.GO1265@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> <20200826180911.6c3303ff@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200826180911.6c3303ff@bsd64.grem.de> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BcBP50y6Mz4GNl X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:38:01 -0000 Hi! > > Any ideas on how man.cgi can be made to also display ports head man > > pages ? > One way would be to extract man pages from the binary packages we > provide - this would allow to have man pages for head and quarterly > branches. [...] man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only missing some job to regulary extract the latest ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/13.0-CURRENT/ports.txz for the current tree of the manuals. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 16:47:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B183B2666 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcBbp6c0Sz4HZC; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1cd2be0d; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=rAJqdr9T WVQKgQloU1kuk6jUhgg=; b=Gbdkw1AwzIHmb4R4fgye8zAgpWrGYrWH4GAAjJKt Oj/KkYb/oHX5POORtOng0L5WFfFJBSbdkTuW36y86z3Xkf/oPZz5QwTr4axKQiuv Lwe8t9ARLL9WtlkcUWyVqaEvHLzU8qCzRCQDq5WfdqEksNPZguXLi6HB1FbV3WO5 +M9op/kRzJ5ZQ3pENltBV3dXGcGn+olD3nNsVzItsExghATKMKUMJFe22AC3ZVDz +g5oP4PYI8lyIGC/9yNIkv9QqLpFN+eMycKRQ9IMOwxUBCh8ZhUC5AbmaWztdN+r ibJ9LAvhKgrTJhHw0qVBRyAAkz662CQqZET2oGZs/tbmVg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=ud BZDQb3S21R7IBUC622TOaPmSYchhnK6oGeGHW0mzKONfnanhV5fICyPbgJBIk0yW k2kfEeJoGMJZsCQqbT0kzhmpoUvXS75fCmKra27i3GGICowvYjidBcw7Dr7mrc8f QO6YindRVqEJPr5diMnbpkPIBlWalTNyrbPaB/zIJGi6PKA7XEV0ziwQnz+GRoES Zg+sUvU7wj9HswIqryWOMiChDL1i2RG63W8mP8kNGO+ef9wgH04vsUYmNEOdhdvw I3Gz8G+Ea61npaabU3YWY1G52McC0FOGHH/b+4ADg9tL6+5f/PZDqckJNJmD5fVN Degz6f4f0e34q75aZY/g== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9ccb0158 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:47:11 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200826184711.512a3b9c@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20200826163751.GO1265@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> <20200826180911.6c3303ff@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826163751.GO1265@fc.opsec.eu> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BcBbp6c0Sz4HZC X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=Gbdkw1Aw; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.37 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; URL_IN_SUBJECT(1.00)[www.freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.88)[-0.881]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:47:20 -0000 On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:37:51 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > Any ideas on how man.cgi can be made to also display ports head > > > man pages ? > > > One way would be to extract man pages from the binary packages we > > provide - this would allow to have man pages for head and quarterly > > branches. [...] > > man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only missing > some job to regulary extract the latest > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/13.0-CURRENT/ports.txz > > for the current tree of the manuals. How does it actually create the pages though? E.g., the man page paperless(7) created by deskutils/py-paperless [0] still isn't available over man.cgi, even though the port was created a long time before 12.1 was released and is in 12.1's ports.txz. Cheers, Michael [0]https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/py-paperless/ -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 16:50:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11A83B2A2F for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcBgs5hWXz4HhK; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kAydK-0009t8-Jg; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:50:46 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:50:46 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Gmelin Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200826165046.GP1265@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> <20200826180911.6c3303ff@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826163751.GO1265@fc.opsec.eu> <20200826184711.512a3b9c@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200826184711.512a3b9c@bsd64.grem.de> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BcBgs5hWXz4HhK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:50:49 -0000 Hi! > > man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only missing > > some job to regulary extract the latest > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/13.0-CURRENT/ports.txz > > > > for the current tree of the manuals. > > How does it actually create the pages though? wosch probably knows this. > E.g., the > man page paperless(7) created by deskutils/py-paperless [0] still isn't > available over man.cgi, even though the port was created a long time > before 12.1 was released and is in 12.1's ports.txz. Interesting. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 26 21:23:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9606C3BD1A6 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcJkc6Cjkz3RVX for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290E412BA for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:23:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm3; bh=Aiud9/MeNhO/AZxKV9IoX7UVqbfzHA8ZByv/cDaJ00k=; b=lcQfZ5ks zZWXGK4oSCPeYJwf3izrMcvAaz+coBFrDigQ622YPuF3k4tg1pAxVqtAcPEdaxv4 Uc5RsWHKQ8xMXhG+Lm1MPZ4ZqDkmpfCyrz1WCvoSQSefFrFCBLG/w/toXQ57cbPo Q4eg4YtSaQHUCDtX5YDxEK/G/A+hvrf/B+oX6bUPgT/YL6FCn27xn6bi+6jMjeps ql7wE8FWvyag3/FFKyKtAVKCUEtr8GzH0tI69hjMdjECQobumjN/ZovwBYmW735l YNbDRbYY04svojwcaoeNOh2vkGppqQx6dVTB0z3ROWmenDPl4nN9VIIn7ckmIiRJ muWgctB6/8eOUQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Aiud9/MeNhO/AZxKV9IoX7UVqbfzH A8ZByv/cDaJ00k=; b=a8PBjZpETvWK0SfxH7nHUCLj2W/1SY1GcD3FOv14YAMkd SeZqF+96rez0/xciqvwbdvxai6PuY/1gIrrvbNuipGrTB6wTvemkZD4PP566p68v rj3/ePakhHknvK7uJvQU9IytCpW8OxzIZTJnjp+qZ6n6aQ8AN4wUWVUmIR1tvOXV su7Umw8AU/Fcl86iTYFyWNG3BeJ2nMlDsBTxwgZF/RZsLPinyzSJeoW7vpbtn7sM JYgh3/X1pzAkAOJfUsQ7+HEKV0Qajwlf3c2HP+oCCJ+kRKpfhEoBQwp8wiTZD69F yBj6frZqxZhbVAWxfHAlJ+38jqqr67JiwCx4brdhw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedruddvvddgudehjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehgtderre dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshcuoehtvggthhdqlhhishhtshesiiih gihsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvefghffftdefkeelleehtdejledvhf dvgeeijeevfffguddvhfetgeejueejueeinecukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqd hlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2DA3E328005E for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:23:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:23:05 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: poudriere complains of "Duplicated origin" for a couple of ports Message-ID: <20200826212305.GB59825@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K8nIJk4ghYZn606h" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BcJkc6Cjkz3RVX X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=lcQfZ5ks; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=a8PBjZpE; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.46 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.24:c]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.76)[-0.762]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.24:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.006]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SH_EMAIL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[0.8.85.249:email]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DBL_PROHIBIT(0.00)[0.8.85.249:email]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[64.147.123.24:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:23:37 -0000 --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Where would I report an issue with "Duplicated origin" causing poudriere bu= lk -a to fail? I temporarily got around the problem by manually deleting the problematic ports from the downloaded ports tree. These were: lang/ocaml-nox11 misc/mc-nox11 ports tree is head@546297 basically do I make a PR to the maintainers of these ports or does someone else look after the ports tree itself? thanks --=20 J. --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl9G0soACgkQs8o7QhFz NAX8Vg/9F89I8kEgmzqPSnDirkToWPd+LoJqZ5vLSLDZiM7xOHlR43silPkG/Aah ntO9xZqY9g5mxoQW5MQeFBg6Z1hGCwoSH8+6sM9AzqnxLzD3tE2y/CkYmuYlZjhq HCrkY+8/DGyLys9IiqgtqS5u2DY1N6KOCbhrpEJM2z1teBKg07a73xSjL6B1w4+x Ho8MGfzuFCSnTfY9yFgeykYE74pwJHYdtQyB9jSLT+97a+GzRswJtD98Ge6Q1IQc 6M7ZB5XLmrHW+fK6K09k76D74/FUS31qbulYFI1qP1GXnQm3LWqLB7bhvmFIY5Np 6Czc7DdYCAzdwxif3LT3kvJO22qK5Zf874lDC0KbcaMELBEDr5qH/nhxFDfuATpa KwYSvzwsDz9C34rSfb0M/aJZdvtnzZ3fdm8RcUzAPCJSRrI5gXunFkMXF/kiJytp RGguvuPIoBf9Plgov+/P/WfRoWdxT5YXljSpTjaYPBJRYq83PN2DCIDi60OVLJWZ JJ9ouNWHiutwevgZiy74pncbABRBFWtbK4/Be0vwBGzWiOI3WmoU7oNDg0j1p1ag siZga6Zb1gnwwDmxaVXYsDH+qzVadHaaGUL2aEaZiiq8ZpgkoEA0FRw6ESwXshxg gs1/TVn2BDZ8zaiheMRdHzH+zJGGvCuJrpypL378xBYZUQD7A0Q= =V/75 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 07:41:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF493CA1CB for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BcZRk3FSPz4JVL for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6F68F3C9B71; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F32F3C9FF9 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcZRk2R9vz4JgJ for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3840420BF0 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07R7fcTU053008 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07R7fcEe053007; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008270741.07R7fcEe053007@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:41:38 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mame | 0.223 | mame0224 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mess | 0.223 | mame0224 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 11:15:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4FD3CE2C1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:15:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.ne@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BcgBZ3yLKz4TrP for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.ne@gmx.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1598526932; bh=kCoos9v16JBaSB+uJNt34bQaBJ0onbVdlfYHZzZmoiY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:To:From:Subject:Date; b=N2Snfusg/h6rtIJdGobbVkLNvar65FBZIBCIClAnVddk6Wg8Y7a6M6phALTLm1hiP 147ggzHOXHxf+bNZxJBa8ZH8n6iXFRB6FPJ0ui3KyNwAaUHZuVMRdFR3deyuhxnWLX ahXOg0KgjfRUMgCXWpmCWA6iIHI3FGlaFBxuhi/w= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from shodan.wg.home ([89.182.209.243]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M7b2T-1kGSwD0lMD-00825r for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:15:32 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Martin Neubauer Autocrypt: addr=m.ne@gmx.net; keydata= mQINBFfDB0ABEADXBxsZH30PPaNJsx5glh3DQmGMUkIXj3Pror3CIlz7sWQx+IXAMrx+8eXx tlsLZkch7hui+nYwLCeEt+75FFQG20yW9jrvplapXRQgzzL+Eo3HMc04qPaXg48vNxDen82c Nq4jhbzXJ2l8WP+ZvmmKrRcjZ94aAv8mOlxEyqjxLUpssMHYTDy4azJV/QLfBCAMnjQZxFJA C8GoHJxY6d7spMYqMBkvf3NaK0ZwjVTXzcb6IyuP8hW06vQ7i3uEfqkaPyy6xG/rTB43pfOe pZj8duq5qFdLDFWp+Ok6eCpQGdVX+WhwQ7jcL+ezUsgtgnXSSFBvSc4v53mFXhqtkLMNtnjY D3wIYn8nqpUiD78XsxmrmO7SNtx5Xvrr25mE8v6VppJBZe9KWkYLemQGVV/ucAfhNCIvTayt cig1KLYwi8kjYV4PgEfuy4AkLg8uhoWSfauYmJoRpjJ2y/AnkFjN9dHiU/rcOS2QVomx04Ke T7Z9PPT22bpq6UFKRW0I5mOgun0+KujX/YHok2OyHfAxMJvSCTMAtYpWiqnkb+/8iFjyOj7Z TLoYpYUwR/69YHa3XOPTBLElULpqpZHQDTy6VBr5RxBi26URiCPaQGWwZZZKCzMBRQMDfWMY VxuDfFnzckRYwJV1f4bZDEtlkIDXbY9Ah1Cl+C5uTwQqFiUXCwARAQABtB5NYXJ0aW4gTmV1 YmF1ZXIgPG0ubmVAZ214Lm5ldD6JAjwEEwEIACcFAlfPSGYCGyMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIGFQgJ CgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQoBLYqhRr9C0+Kw/3T0sNZEByXfzL6OTZKP0A90u3kyAYm0ZT Kxk1LhQVS9+S0pINtOX3lrHL/Z8Nwf+ON8QoVhpyIZJqZntLfPieFl2GNaE5TrkC4y+DkZnb O9/VkoDKq+zjIQxvrkdMpEIZ5x2r4Qmwi8twqwz6IK5bbeE0TQDTJXb85SMU1Pn251P4Tca5 jfvIBEeDs1dBlHwUUSYvaZ4IYWpbIXD/4M7fIYVJMG330AHUr5snXkmtgZwFfLEAnpMjpoHo ymrDPKTBOeA+GmxPgRY12GyJjE1IZu/KdOW9HWqoDop4aBVMOjgEi+GbPv0ARIcf6DMzI+FH clFWq+c+EZqjwAuVH0wjKXE/4Z05X6OWWSxCADkBMzKTzU4PTif+wpn8jxFDq10gSuJ7sNxB T4Eef6jr79FkEHe9X1DYo0fqEHK9GkFEwVJa+3wwnJIpAD4pMBm61H7gVQsz+29Osz90kkt2 YNowM+gkgq8d+wuENxHzhD1wgfe5Y0Y+0F3Bya4OkjWVl1fpJCN4tRhxnSDGvpHzZIqGZmUY ZhW8zWYY3I/CHrK0p2uFOk1Q2mY+WAK3WZaVuWj7ZzZ/sxiumGyowK89yjm+6mjLO+ufgGNL rpcvBJZTpohI3QJ82f++mFrjcGR2y97WPVW4/VNZcrD5COxXM2wNRKx+yprBKPc2qAuG/int ULkCDQRXwwdAARAAydAzpW0qwq/nkC3KPykvlWi7h4wOryoHrE79xORsUNUcUqRz+ilCw/Yk 84cTdlSt6aLYxOFB3M9iE2gNYxKn/hGuz2SxurO7THQERjnSX9OtHkEIxhUzcK/aYLqw26gl GmsSE+SspB2qO13lIz/8KSlRyrJxN3sk2bDDcd88ogcv4iXYXQWwxGZj9HcWQYpQjxjwyVam 11WbXqBzBupYPtKudHquC1ZUHZ62Ccthv/dFKHiwKpRgSjnTzylOSqH3K0AswTVQPBWXc2B+ AQohE9RiIEwid1pSacg3NFDhHzbyekUR/6xsCLB0MDh9RLCA6/A1CvsYaM7n1zzvieMFuNKo 8U9ugbQPVv+t3l3LKu/pcEK7ZixgnPgpmoEO4bcK4OPxv+GmWwg10F0E1I61t9t1pQOyp0BF +V0WP0FL0D1Pl+F4NZnFAeorNxjjk6pXNAmSlgaoBJjEpvezqxebSHv/IKFYR//KL0035vdf vghVhnP11Vvx2XGFyjNyWwo+l8KCYYP9ch5pCcLUjHmlZTRRzi9PMrjCv/hwujn5/prKNutR hgEvBp+Ru5v5nKqFX1RYtBULbOTC2TpmghQYkrTSgENcID1FLI4Yd0CkmD3OkMn+cf75ctyR NyW8VhuxOKKp/oCz1CGqo2J+9lZVyewtirCdcWn6mjyMAMfjdoMAEQEAAYkCJQQYAQgADwUC V8MHQAIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRCgEtiqFGv0LcFdD/0d9fvuYBXrh0Pbav0AN5K4q3CMpnWRCxfM zjE4Uwr66lAzP34sPCK98o0iJylktIsFz8DFWr3e8Vx++wUibl+PM+qUMbr2yjXv/ckt+tJT rDjTA3kPB5Go9l0ticXOjzttFFygB3a8iT6sYYx1kNzmWIzXKHbhChgZ3NkWepYbTk94EEWd HBSuUTVi2oHJ7jPJhQx4Bt1sL3xRKAppK9LgZyn4Gzu1xUaCiTLaCYQkdpwCK1xujx+RNvrP VNNTWmlg5pGqBLse5/mAob1Yz8rcZ0GT34fnViNgRwsnd03g6yxmtMb42EuvHmVJ34bbq708 J/bvsp9UVa5s/s5APo96Upmi8sMp5ymkRy8ERn27uJmmkAMUS/jkZliquJUVPykxlr7tbMMc yCbp2E5HW7qxPVV+t4ROAu26utUxl3yVAdy6CwQVIUU9tf5KcgjdBxBwYKX4tP7vEjF8sOky cT6CVGfJ44xtGF1kN8m4qJavhGX/pN1jn8/fOiUtvEXievdQ6aUHVrGBz2u/R9heLoq8hMPn OSpwuKWrh0qY9XHWUT7l0j9ebJwTD+vEF+IC8emDZaIENwfKJYxbiB65g1UrSbE0bTZ+Cx0v 5uNkrvRK1+/69muFihncFdjEqIc/NIJ9akmaG1wB823thJ5FDjYgv1yeB7M/f+89mnQmXFD8 iQ== Subject: print/lilypond-devel: build failure on 13.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <0419337c-e2d4-9eb7-e1f9-38d206057f54@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:15:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lEdlv9N7bNhMOMKOz8EsXaJg97oUujyaF" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:xHAi/h5gUjpCgZhaoKiJGYVkDxY1yDjb2sdHa39mfqDKHaneWGf g2MT5vY6h5QBOao2F8O7wvx/ia6Cas3UMNFv5QI0e+SYhGsJkQx0rt/N4wdoRQ4PjH9RkgD tDRWC5uZ3TeQzb8uypuIzq9tYWGuUChkRCaaKugKfvOilc9lHAgmJQ94eoiHlSmX+VxqbtM hDovziJIk11f17gGLvQ3Q== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:tOGdBE9zSHs=:1D64rxyLbIdYVNlgKVbBZc A+odEgOIJ/0aLXMXBYcoZFnAAwyyQnHNChegRL71zxNIR54GsvRYdoVnG4uAMU1HzfUDJ+V9n MxCV989lS/dRWeOCywTa7QUxV9QBNspqUO49oKO+qudVXOsv2xbgaAO+l83Y/tjsvpNE7k7E9 OTsPjEiTKHKDNaF4ANB3WAfAAUEnHY43lw3E/wUkoCtEy26c0ZCtjqx3gqHieHkmjasbHX6o0 KzGVYOPiqZyBOkyGbJ/pw3HObHB6/+N1XM96rsN9hHLxxfWNiy39KhBKUKXFNZu53WXmTkNoE n47y5jXEfkmn4qL7O+yjfQLXJyWPExTASrq3XdOTUv9Tgv5H9lNA9zLXlFoeY32V6lYcOCjWn ogJcfZOnLzYazFrA7Yyc96WVfGbvdmBKQ4EcJXvlbc93MNt5qh8O/evQ5oTIKGJvd3y8jI21g 1i/szL51EZl1efhpTFUGnpaBmgsCgQ/2GV5IFJBCxHVh8y6KeyLDhSWD5frmz9HCCaJR3eFqB 2IjJ9HfHh0WYIdauoRMEvaHUJHybgETpw0q4I7VaryzZgMmPjUxorOsYCuHjWYebP9QQe+vBX ats8/+o/3FCkM1BsOPyOUfNRrMrUeAmxkFpC3ERIoHRO6LFfAuxpp2lp0YB7oVl2QIU9GbIEL F9ZTfY62dZHrWFrfXZ2a3AsbeH+BGpDW7u7jhoO8fFkVzHiuw+Sym17yABRJ968IqjseUndMc Mrzb6TYQhdEnZ160/qxHP4TmLNgkq6eDQCdJqrx8HuMYTrVxyg/KU0ApRxXo/ZApDxr71HKEU GDud5lJ2bQPPzDPL3q7w18+B2fm9iCmIf3FpNGHD7xoL37rwoAUojXctElEVcoKAEBVhW5S/0 fVz3GJ4Oe2OBOAZ0Vkm/OSxxkPC7dmR8/sFC4ux3s5ewlbhauL95F2OPp4KPeEqpsopL8HJfO RLeuUGybbWS06O+7mHl7sQyymjHP95cYbvW51nO/tFv19lHHOHAJV/mjEMygxUyfsi/g0it1f PhVSu6VUZJbWCiitRF/JzPSUsoz0QHOXmby9iTdJX95UzBn+Lw/FOvnPxJFS9zEyF7czxOdMh QpG8+l+8WBEMQPVyxnSHicRNa+nilNQzGrbqSbtJphgQEbH9+SixEHRQ6NJor1nK9wwWPbhJQ FUclVgV6sQtpHolGL+zb6+xceAcojgtoolKXiNo7KYdD0SKU+znnddY0sv8eLt1pVznuqKjIq 4mFeYWLm23+bawFgB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BcgBZ3yLKz4TrP X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=N2Snfusg; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of m.ne@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=m.ne@gmx.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.17.0/27]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[89.182.209.243:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.012]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.17.22:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmx.net:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.984]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gmx.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.092]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.22:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:15:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lEdlv9N7bNhMOMKOz8EsXaJg97oUujyaF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="beqOZjWo9tZcYWHfyMxjrtucxcD2VWgDH"; protected-headers="v1" From: Martin Neubauer To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <0419337c-e2d4-9eb7-e1f9-38d206057f54@gmx.net> Subject: print/lilypond-devel: build failure on 13.0-CURRENT --beqOZjWo9tZcYWHfyMxjrtucxcD2VWgDH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, A few days ago I started getting reports of build failures for print/lilypod-devel (e.g. http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p546132_s364744/lo= gs/lilypond-devel-2.21.5.log) Due to lack of time at the moment I wasn't able to set up a FreeBSD 13 system in order to perform a more thorough analysis of the issue. However, I think I found a workaround, shown at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248946 Maybe someone can test the proposed patch on a recent 13.0-CURRENT system and, hopefully, have it committed to the ports tree. Best regards, Martin --=20 Estimated total size Original: 1004 bytes Compressed: 41.2 KB --beqOZjWo9tZcYWHfyMxjrtucxcD2VWgDH-- --lEdlv9N7bNhMOMKOz8EsXaJg97oUujyaF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMHVrsqKu60F5jvxaoBLYqhRr9C0FAl9HldMACgkQoBLYqhRr 9C1mzxAAk3YJCjuFWp+1FOR0H7HHj5EjO0MeZ8GtyAN+8uqEbKB9nDnKfKDMr3pD RhT/4o5ktieRQOZDXUZxGzov/WlRRbs9WGk+HVGyZT6pCsGqVfjeZSqwZovdYNQU /xrfG7wsIjLJrGpzHzacuf3VOQWUcmOSGnGwyaRa5VUI0klPMUyaQQA/EJi6Y5GC RO4XX+kifspkk5Y5mQvS5tmO22oEo50SSmBvDqJgbOhH5yIDVPsdSf4HI5ym6cDM CGCv4u0uxSUU+3J7O0HNFuahsy4dFzUMQcTxzCl8z70dsOevzfAeTExy4CfmifeF P9SeViFEq91lLGfA69HnOTcK1F4EoqLEBeq8ddOJTy8VI4zfjj0WlejtQa/IPzkV MW3+5D7hzx7hs7ZLKR6iLSeX6P2u9Zv51JM2QHhEll7CjiwpXNvSTkX/b3KIvdGU kNZr+yqUzmGrJq/8sxzRLRhacl4gUZTPK+l6ThzUI3ph57hD+LSFL0EvQud2KM5p PQm77Tk6FGU5ydYzR3BLf7KJVFwktMJiDuVDrhkBCjNT6/2xLkRmJ4aIdr2OO1Ww iTh8gAc5HwdGQgGvz8pMZfXlqaH903AUCcOgUrxJ29HSzBb20A2EPUlzSgmio3HP bDF48n9RHia8e8OCtdaKoAckIQKRfy1Af5BH7PzKm4d3+jJXoKw= =okFp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lEdlv9N7bNhMOMKOz8EsXaJg97oUujyaF-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 14:03:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4753B387E for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bckw059Nnz3SDq for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:03:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07RE3Amc061013 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:03:10 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 07RE3Adm061012 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:03:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:03:10 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the state of amd64 ports on -CURRENT as of 20200827 Message-ID: <20200827140310.GL5141@albert.catwhisker.org> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20200827135507.GA26503@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2QlKE9+KJSV1ShrO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200827135507.GA26503@lonesome.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bckw059Nnz3SDq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[david]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.962]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.24)[0.245]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.018]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:03:14 -0000 --2QlKE9+KJSV1ShrO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:55:08PM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote: > The latest build of amd64-CURRENT ports has just completed: >=20 > http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=3Dhead-amd64-defau= lt&build=3Dp546132_s364744 >=20 > The number of build failures is now 740. This is an slight drop from > the initial post-clang11 commit of 830. This is due to diligent work > by a more than a dozen ports committers. I appreciate their efforts. > .... As maintainer of a (likely rarely-used) port (x11-wm/piewm), I received a note from pkg-fallout, requested & received advice on how to adrdess it, filed a bug report & attached a maintainer-approved patch; got some advice on a better fix, updated the bug report with the better fix ... and have now received at least 3 more notices of the same failure on the same port... It's https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248859, in case you wanted to see for yourself. As I'm not a committer, it's not clear to me what (else) I can do to help fix this. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "Those countries that have lost control of the virus like the United States are seeing economic forecasts constantly revised down and are weaker economically." -- Dominick Stephens, Westpac NZ's chief economist See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --2QlKE9+KJSV1ShrO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl9HvR1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PcmP8wgAl2MQWTHhjpYqwsGanJCSqQ1NpBfqD7FRupDy66dcFAytO1SUCBiaiOvu Z3C8Wsx3qcsfgoPU4ovAMj6G5FrJ3DPmWx3X5yNGlz+1todLaZ+P1FpSqmqVFLOo U6KX96zPsOJjzambQ92d/3TMVFiYl6zKPUGPVlMsj/BFFwVjH6FGO8QBiCnZaZJL Wy7tFceJ8Ux+f2Ox/T89b/n4/HxwbPxAFNzr3OlJh2oHfeO0yN+/Db/dgPIYzANh 4DbjdBwu5cD5zx4RUCmZ3Qf6Vvw33PZXrJoYiU2ibXydzquWtljV6Dsz0hsWKVij 27Nkjst6XBf0Pn7beWDl9uxQB7PYtw== =cEFA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2QlKE9+KJSV1ShrO-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 14:28:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE78C3B4338 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BclTb5b1Pz3T6G for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id i10so6032277iow.3 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:28:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=k0qzrodVZmUhOUSoX4+zvwc37ZEJmqy3pXYJqO8Kr8c=; b=swgaaCf0w6dQF0arkzaR7Hd7xhNBJULLfwrvcxZZ7deMH01g/RE5QQlo15kw2Yhnlm sKK+Ct+nKnrZbld0/OJzZqklZ6ENC3E4oFnQ5qnH4bRGOKOKMkT4WrMYG8njPKmQX+rJ 82xvqAaoZCQOqQpbr1Tooe4V/+KPpkZWvlh8QyOjZYeexdV50vQ2GDfvO6KduJt+aBKg 88h8s+x1msscz5qSAb/KhLovodAmKfT87sASPfLLgmjXRUqB0OojG3ox4kUnvb5l5DeX tczhe6x0fEtuMparRHJDFhykUqa0VISyzwyq/5XVdieKhRH/gYC5EYTi12hekGPF8FBf 3xGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PF2sMCvyMC1MP9cRv7rfGcmM1raC+6+lO6XnO/ZokuNGya0J5 SRrpvk6vBEHEz4FMte05RsGIC2KX+pCh47Ok7MpBdQnb X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDYUh6Jq/9kob9vJQtYZhQAnIx+JZzLkq9ytZcZ9tYSZsfkaZ9cY11CDqSYN5K3FnNhAJ6g20NRMgPw0dR9j8= X-Received: by 2002:a02:820b:: with SMTP id o11mr19880811jag.136.1598538528235; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:28:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200827135507.GA26503@lonesome.com> <20200827140310.GL5141@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20200827140310.GL5141@albert.catwhisker.org> From: Ed Maste Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:28:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: the state of amd64 ports on -CURRENT as of 20200827 To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BclTb5b1Pz3T6G X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.72 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[carpeddiem]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.19)[-0.191]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.898]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.166.45:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.37)[0.367]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.166.45:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:28:52 -0000 On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 10:03, David Wolfskill wrote: > > It's https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248859, in case you > wanted to see for yourself. > > As I'm not a committer, it's not clear to me what (else) I can do to > help fix this. Hopefully your email will help raise the visibility of this issue and a ports committer will pick it up. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 02:29:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01DB3CA6FE; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:29:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiri@truefc.org) Received: from kx.truefc.org (1.212.52.36.ap.yournet.ne.jp [36.52.212.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp", Issuer "smtp" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bd3T02N8Hz3br2; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiri@truefc.org) Received: from kx.truefc.org (kx.truefc.org [36.52.212.1]) by kx.truefc.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S2TD6K098319; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:29:13 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kiri@kx.truefc.org) Message-Id: <202008280229.07S2TD6K098319@kx.truefc.org> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:29:13 +0900 From: KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, kiri@truefc.org Subject: To late to build packages in arm64/aarch64 on qemu User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 24) (Standard C) (amd64--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bd3T02N8Hz3br2 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kiri@truefc.org has no SPF policy when checking 36.52.212.1) smtp.mailfrom=kiri@truefc.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.86 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[kiri]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.28)[0.283]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.59)[-0.591]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[truefc.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.07)[0.065]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10013, ipnet:36.52.208.0/21, country:JP]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization,freebsd-arm,freebsd-ports]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:29:25 -0000 Hi, all I'm tring to build packages in arm64/aarch64 on qemu-system-aarch64. But it's too late in comparision to amd64 on bhyve. For example, `make package-recursive' of devel/binutils on qemu takes 67 times of bhyve [1]. I found that it's difference caused from disk geometry factors such as stripesize, cylinders according to firmware and heads according to firmware [2]. I also try to test in qcow2 format with cache-size 4 GB, but nothing progress: root@vm:/vm/test # qemu-system-aarch64 -machine virt -cpu cortex-a57 -smp 4 -m 8G,maxmem=8G -name test -blockdev driver=file,node-name=hd0,filename=FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-arm64-aarch64.qcow2 -blockdev driver=qcow2,node-name=hda,file=hd0,overlap-check=none,cache-size=4294967296 -device virtio-blk-device,drive=hda -nographic -monitor telnet::5045,server,nowait,nodelay -serial telnet::5044,server,nowait,nodelay -bios QEMU_EFI.fd root@vm:~ # telnet localhost 5044 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. FreeBSD/arm64 (freebsd) (ttyu0) login: root Aug 28 02:25:30 freebsd login[865]: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyu0 Last login: Fri Aug 28 01:14:36 on ttyu0 FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT (GENERIC) #0 r364182: Thu Aug 13 05:44:54 UTC 2020 Welcome to FreeBSD! Release Notes, Errata: https://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/ Security Advisories: https://www.FreeBSD.org/security/ FreeBSD Handbook: https://www.FreeBSD.org/handbook/ FreeBSD FAQ: https://www.FreeBSD.org/faq/ Questions List: https://lists.FreeBSD.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions/ FreeBSD Forums: https://forums.FreeBSD.org/ Documents installed with the system are in the /usr/local/share/doc/freebsd/ directory, or can be installed later with: pkg install en-freebsd-doc For other languages, replace "en" with a language code like de or fr. Show the version of FreeBSD installed: freebsd-version ; uname -a Please include that output and any error messages when posting questions. Introduction to manual pages: man man FreeBSD directory layout: man hier Edit /etc/motd.template to change this login announcement. root@freebsd:~ # df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ufs/rootfs 4053356 2727620 1001468 73% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev root@freebsd:~ # diskinfo -tv /dev/ufs/rootfs /dev/ufs/rootfs 512 # sectorsize 4295020032 # mediasize in bytes (4.0G) 8388711 # mediasize in sectors 0 # stripesize 34091520 # stripeoffset 8322 # Cylinders according to firmware. 16 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. # Disk descr. # Disk ident. # Attachment Yes # TRIM/UNMAP support Unknown # Rotation rate in RPM Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 0.133557 sec = 0.534 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 0.136215 sec = 0.545 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 0.290992 sec = 0.582 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 0.204633 sec = 0.512 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 0.246820 sec = 0.617 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 1.149787 sec = 0.561 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 1.162127 sec = 0.567 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 0.499821 sec = 204873 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 0.498121 sec = 205573 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 0.488791 sec = 209496 kbytes/sec root@freebsd:~ # Is there any suggetions? Best regards [1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2020-August/008753.html [2] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2020-August/008785.html --- Kazuhiko Kiriyama From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 08:05:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4E33D13C2 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdBwn514gz4BpM for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ABDF33D0EF7; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA9F3D0EF6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdBwn4Bkqz4BNw for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73A4711ADD for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S85Tu8073761 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07S85TXk073760; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008280805.07S85TXk073760@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:29 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/qdecoder | 12.0.5 | v12.0.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 10:42:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DD13D4DEC for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdGPp40lTz4Mk5 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07SAgBYk012534 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:42:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Fwd: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build References: <202008280933.07S9X3J2074396@beefy17.nyi.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <202008280933.07S9X3J2074396@beefy17.nyi.freebsd.org> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:42:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202008280933.07S9X3J2074396@beefy17.nyi.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdGPp40lTz4Mk5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.961]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.02)[-0.017]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.889]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:42:23 -0000 Hello. Should I consider the following or just trash it, given the warning? bye & Thanks av. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:33:03 GMT From: pkg-fallout@FreeBSD.org To: ml@netfence.it CC: pkg-fallout@FreeBSD.org You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. ... !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1300113, Host: 1300100) !!! !!! This is not supported. !!! !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! !!! Expect build failures. !!! ... From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 10:54:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A093D4A75 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdGgw5070z4NSF for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFFD139A9 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:54:28 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=tavi.co.uk; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=WMVYPre 3XoMCosw/mDnM5ekFEmA=; b=nAEdge6Uk7JRq3OBk+HCQeWHYHHGLu13racRiND HxXLllPW8fHkk+hJWbqysJxcHx+wOstEeUh8p87VeGKfhoLdhWw4Q9nhTUnG7akI 92IJjxLee3DyGXvjMxvx+8dkwMCvdtkHGkmktRu1sLZsBDz+PVt5NhkiZpYZBbUX jE74= Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) (Authenticated sender: rde@tavi.co.uk) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AFE03139E8 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:54:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:54:29 +0100 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build Message-ID: <20200828115429.0edc09b9@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <202008280933.07S9X3J2074396@beefy17.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdGgw5070z4NSF X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tavi.co.uk header.s=selector1 header.b=nAEdge6U; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tavi.co.uk; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rde@tavi.co.uk designates 81.187.145.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rde@tavi.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.19 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tavi.co.uk:s=selector1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.021]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:kipling.tavi.co.uk]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.954]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tavi.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tavi.co.uk,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.32)[-0.318]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20712, ipnet:81.187.0.0/16, country:GB]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:54:37 -0000 On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:42:11 +0200 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Should I consider the following or just trash it, given the warning? > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1300113, Host: 1300100) !!! > !!! This is not supported. !!! > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > !!! Expect build failures. !!! You often get that warning. The rest of it will indicate a problem with the port, and it will need fixing. I have three ports with recent fallout. I've fixed them all, and the PRs are waiting to be processed. I am still getting fallout messages every day, presumably until the fixes are committed! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 13:32:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BC43B1949 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdLB56ZnTz4ZS1 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kBeUT-000CZm-CI; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:32:25 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 15:32:25 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build Message-ID: <20200828133225.GQ3539@home.opsec.eu> References: <202008280933.07S9X3J2074396@beefy17.nyi.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdLB56ZnTz4ZS1 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:32:30 -0000 Hi! > Should I consider the following or just trash it, given the warning? The 'jail is newer' warning can be ignored, most of the time. The 'package build' error is probably real. Reason: Very recently, llvm11 was imported, see: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2020-August/201174.html That compiler now defaults to -fno-common, where it was -fcommon in the past. This means: variables defined as int xyz; in one .c file and similarly in some other .c file, when linked together, fail to link because there are duplicate definitions. See man cc: -fcommon, -fno-common This flag specifies that variables without initializers get common linkage. It can be disabled with -fno-common. So, if possible, fix your port. > You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain > is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. > Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix > build. > > ... > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1300113, Host: 1300100) !!! > !!! This is not supported. !!! > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > !!! Expect build failures. !!! > ... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 14:36:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1643B340D for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdMbx0b4Fz4fLx for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07SEaNKn041415 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Fwd: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <202008280933.07S9X3J2074396@beefy17.nyi.freebsd.org> <20200828133225.GQ3539@home.opsec.eu> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200828133225.GQ3539@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdMbx0b4Fz4fLx X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.46 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.839]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.28)[-0.275]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.55)[-0.546]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:36:30 -0000 On 2020-08-28 15:32, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Should I consider the following or just trash it, given the warning? > > The 'jail is newer' warning can be ignored, most of the time. Thanks, I'll look into this, then. bye av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 28 16:37:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675453B6C7A for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdQHf0Wvhz3ZWy for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BdQHb4jqwz3mrC; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:37:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id MNZ1JCidZC7a; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vivi.daemonic.se (vivi.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1200::4]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BdQGq3xfqz3mxZ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: deprecation of drm-legacy-kmod To: George Mitchell , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <82a5b9c8-b331-1cb9-7bcd-8525dcb345bf@m5p.com> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: <987e3e12-e01f-68c5-cf33-da6d6026c0eb@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:36:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <82a5b9c8-b331-1cb9-7bcd-8525dcb345bf@m5p.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdQHf0Wvhz3ZWy X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:37:34 -0000 On 2020-08-25 00:32, George Mitchell wrote: > On 2020-08-24 18:21, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> [ cross posted across several mailing lists, please respect reply-to ] >> >> Hi! >> >> It is time to deprecate drm-legacy-kmod [...] it is time for it to go. >> >> The driver will remain for a transition period.=C2=A0 For FreeBSD 13-C= URRENT, >> this will be fairly short, as there are changes to FreeBSD base that >> breaks the drivers.=C2=A0 For FreeBSD 12, the driver will remain a bit >> longer, to ease in transition.=C2=A0 On FreeBSD 12, there is also the = option >> of using the graphics drivers in base, although those are supported on= a >> best-effort basis only. [...] > My secret decoder ring is telling me the implicit message here > (along with a recent Qt5 "upgrade") is that the FreeBSD home page > explicit statement that the 11.3 and 11.4 releases of FreeBSD are > in production status is a bit of a lie. I know I'm going to have > to upgrade to 12 sooner or later, but I just don't have a warm, > fuzzy feeling about that right now. >=20 > Forgive me for venting ... -- George >=20 The legacy drm drivers are available in base in 11 if you need them, in=20 fact, the drm-legacy-kmod port was never available on FreeBSD 11. You=20 can also use drm-kmod on FreeBSD 11. From a desktop standpoint, yes, FreeBSD 11 is getting old, and is=20 getting harder and harder to maintain, and there will be no driver=20 updates to support newer GPUs on 11 for instance. Currently there are=20 no plans to remove any support for running FreeBSD 11 on the desktop. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 07:30:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDFF3D01FC for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bdp5T1PhHz44FP for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2FFD43D063B; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9993CFEF5 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bdp5T0WmSz44FM for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0AD220EB for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07T7U4WJ019594 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07T7U4v0019593; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008290730.07T7U4v0019593@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:04 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:30:05 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/afni | 20.2.14 | afni_20.2.15 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 23:27:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB1C3C1484 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfCKv4MdGz4FVb for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9412E3C0FC0; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D963C1244 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from lax.lemis.com (www.lemis.com [45.32.70.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfCKt4S6Zz4FSH; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from eureka.lemis.com (aussie-gw.lemis.com [167.179.139.35]) by lax.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2878627FF9; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eureka.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 84EA026359A; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:27:07 +1000 (AEST) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:27:07 +1000 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Stefan Esser Cc: Niclas Zeising , Michael Gmelin , FreeBSD Developers , tcberner@FreeBSD.org, ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Aggressive ports removal (was: svn commit: r546907 - head/x11-clocks/wmtime) Message-ID: <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-3-5309-0418 Mobile: +61-490-494-038. Use only as instructed. WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfCKt4S6Zz4FSH X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grog@lemis.com has no SPF policy when checking 45.32.70.18) smtp.mailfrom=grog@lemis.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.66)[-0.662]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[grog]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.89)[-0.886]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.633]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:45.32.64.0/19, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:27:15 -0000 --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry for the length of the quotes, but I've added people who might not have seen the (relatively long) thread on this subject. This seems the best message to refer to. On Saturday, 29 August 2020 at 16:09:12 +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 29.08.20 um 15:32 schrieb Niclas Zeising: >> On 2020-08-29 14:48, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> As I???ve seen quite a lot of similar commits: >>> >>> Is our policy now to deprecate ports (with one month notice) that >>> aren???t maintained/have a dead upstream, even though the ports still >>> work okay and aren???t the type that requires much maintenance anyway? >>> >> >> Hi! >> As far as I know, there is no official policy, this was something that >> Tobias (tcberner@) and I (mostly I) agreed on, since we're doing a lot >> of the lifting when it comes to -fno-common. >> >> However, there is a lot of stale, old, unmaintained and possibly broken >> software in the Ports tree, and I viewed this as a chance to clean out >> some of the cruft.=A0 All these ports take resources from people needing >> to fix them, from the build cluster which is building them, and so on. >> Since there is no upstream fix for -fno-common, and there is no >> maintainer, I thought it would be a good idea to deprecate such ports, >> since there is no apparent interest in them.=A0 -fno-common is the new >> standard way of building C code (both llvm 11 and gcc 10 defaults to >> it).=A0 If someone is interested in the port, they can easily submit a PR >> to maintain the port and remove the deprecation (or commit the fix, if >> they are a FreeBSD committer). >> If they are removed, and someone in the future decides to take care of >> one (or more) of them, they can easily be resurrected, since they will >> live on in SVN (and git) history. > > No maintainer and no changes for a long time does not imply that there > is no interest in a port! > > If it just works, serves its purpose for those using a minimal X11 > environment (there are still twm users) and there is no indication > of a lingering security problem, then why depreciate and later delete > such a working port? Exactly. Another case in point: x11/xtset. Maintenance stopped in 1993, 11 days after the FreeBSD project came into existence. It works fine, and I find it very useful. If at some time in the future it should no longer work with the latest and greatest iteration of the C programming language or ports structure, that shouldn't be a reason to discard it. My suggestion: 1. Decisions to deprecate remove ports should be made only by portmgr@. 2. Ports are not broken because they don't easily adapt to some new ports framework. 3. Ports should not be removed without community consultation, which should last for at least n months, with m reminders being sent. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAl9K5EsACgkQIubykFB6QiP/XACfTU1l6Hjt+ziBm57JiceidlTc hFQAoIvOq2RtBfeJEC6iaSSOKhyzTem2 =fzGb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi--