From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 00:50:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B48D3C2E2B for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:50:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfF9v0Nmhz4KDt for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:50:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0B80D3C300C; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3F53C3101 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:50:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-io1-xd41.google.com (mail-io1-xd41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfF9s50jCz4KKK for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-io1-xd41.google.com with SMTP id g14so2750173iom.0 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:50:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Rd/DhKg1HuwtcWAg+z7/A1nU6KvrXkCN5PPkfd9OAQg=; b=KDc/lSSUVCSNbDlYRUyax+m0jZkoxVlwz38o4MUbOaAxkPVtOuaEzOP2lVA9be6zBm rkFNntPJUaHzcxFRJC7ywt2GL5ung4jsiRMEa7FjuA3Za7nsnjE0ZeAjU9Rvr4WirEkb ks0AcUdk+dhZK1q3xx3q2/YSqLAVYm6RyJoQgm8i3a5YTvWP1cDlLvvUeFUm4nBGO1ki ezCgHLJLPhxRcfjPQeASE5OXHjBfoxW0D6qmK8tiBEZqaH7mRkOCB6ILFBKQtwJlxQvG pjFZs8+UQioERhHQ3qHnzTDL2jW5ii1641V0vm2uw1t7a9YdKceScMH6yIXcFKU34iGZ SnUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Rd/DhKg1HuwtcWAg+z7/A1nU6KvrXkCN5PPkfd9OAQg=; b=dDMEWiRLtBoJcm4QWa6GYDuXWnUgs6WYI90wb5xx6QbXm+UmUxEWL90GWPf1WIxZN2 UOauN1GxCnYdCBlV6igZQv14KsgGJKTln1CWtGiYi1AI3lwEJDSRFiRYBQDLCvPsTn0l c8NoaokBfYx9s99mT/NMTMs3YqXzkJwhtwSYtmfkj10PEPsrnNdOD2D0xynuuETHuFUi rd2d2whp9h3MnkKBkzcMkDW+CUbrSvLhvcOGeyxCO6M0tuaPTrECbJQQKb6BRwhslXUs iNwDQ5I/RMbq31ndtXRVTtiKwK8ufvMAZkyjuKTzuBTD1K/at1pVGqmCNGiVY9vXMksu CEaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310HxcK6veiGpZdFULsGYS5XhUFxfrVhAgT5wSKaGc5lCfK+uET eQYee9PJ212rjZUAOieeFelong== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyITc9ev1OyB/LAis0zJiz2WZrSwZ4CxFpanc91yhjZ3DD1CQ8/lxdkINgeQ8wqeH2a1AnDPg== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:600a:: with SMTP id r10mr4040399iog.0.1598748624125; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:8c3:8100:160f:8929:68ed:e6d8:b045? ([2601:8c3:8100:160f:8929:68ed:e6d8:b045]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 187sm1881146iow.34.2020.08.29.17.50.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:50:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Adam Weinberger Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal (was: svn commit: r546907 - head/x11-clocks/wmtime) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:50:22 -0600 Message-Id: <4F34C480-63D3-48C4-9747-FDA1E5D66507@adamw.org> References: Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Stefan Esser , Niclas Zeising , Michael Gmelin , FreeBSD Developers , tcberner@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17G80) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfF9s50jCz4KKK X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=KDc/lSSU; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.68 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[adamw]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.67)[-1.672]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.020]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:50:27 -0000 Just a disclaimer: I=E2=80=99m speaking for myself here, not on behalf of po= rtmgr@. Also please keep in mind that I am perpetually, pathologically optim= istic. > On Aug 29, 2020, at 18:01, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020, 5:27 PM Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrot= e: >> Sorry for the length of the quotes, but I've added people who might >> not have seen the (relatively long) thread on this subject. This >> seems the best message to refer to. >>=20 >> On Saturday, 29 August 2020 at 16:09:12 +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >> > Am 29.08.20 um 15:32 schrieb Niclas Zeising: >> >> On 2020-08-29 14:48, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >>> As I???ve seen quite a lot of similar commits: >> >>> >> >>> Is our policy now to deprecate ports (with one month notice) that >> >>> aren???t maintained/have a dead upstream, even though the ports still= >> >>> work okay and aren???t the type that requires much maintenance anyway= ? >> >>> >> >> >> >> Hi! >> >> As far as I know, there is no official policy, this was something that= >> >> Tobias (tcberner@) and I (mostly I) agreed on, since we're doing a lot= >> >> of the lifting when it comes to -fno-common. >> >> >> >> However, there is a lot of stale, old, unmaintained and possibly broke= n >> >> software in the Ports tree, and I viewed this as a chance to clean out= >> >> some of the cruft. All these ports take resources from people needing= >> >> to fix them, from the build cluster which is building them, and so on.= >> >> Since there is no upstream fix for -fno-common, and there is no >> >> maintainer, I thought it would be a good idea to deprecate such ports,= >> >> since there is no apparent interest in them. -fno-common is the new >> >> standard way of building C code (both llvm 11 and gcc 10 defaults to >> >> it). If someone is interested in the port, they can easily submit a P= R >> >> to maintain the port and remove the deprecation (or commit the fix, if= >> >> they are a FreeBSD committer). >> >> If they are removed, and someone in the future decides to take care of= >> >> one (or more) of them, they can easily be resurrected, since they will= >> >> live on in SVN (and git) history. >> > >> > No maintainer and no changes for a long time does not imply that there >> > is no interest in a port! >> > >> > If it just works, serves its purpose for those using a minimal X11 >> > environment (there are still twm users) and there is no indication >> > of a lingering security problem, then why depreciate and later delete >> > such a working port? >>=20 >> Exactly. Another case in point: x11/xtset. Maintenance stopped in >> 1993, 11 days after the FreeBSD project came into existence. It works >> fine, and I find it very useful. If at some time in the future it >> should no longer work with the latest and greatest iteration of the C >> programming language or ports structure, that shouldn't be a reason to >> discard it. >>=20 >> My suggestion: >>=20 >> 1. Decisions to deprecate remove ports should be made only by >> portmgr@. >=20 >=20 > This is a bad idea. It disempowers the community of ports developers and c= ontributors.=20 I agree 100% with Warner here. I think what we=E2=80=99ve seen here is the s= ystem working exactly the way it=E2=80=99s supposed to: a committer uses his= or her judgment, others disagree and start a discussion, and changes are ma= de. It doesn=E2=80=99t mean that we should take autonomy away, and I will al= ways come down on the side of trusting committers to DTRT. Quarterly branches let us have these sorts of discussions and support the pr= ocess, because nothing in latest is set in stone (though I=E2=80=99d strongl= y urge people to avoid making any significant changes in the two weeks befor= e a branch point). I=E2=80=99d be in support of making the actual removal of expired ports the p= urview of portmgr (Ren=C3=A9 has been so on top of this, I think we=E2=80=99= re going to have to staple him to his keyboard and never let him leave), but= I=E2=80=99d prefer to leave the deprecation decision up to the team. >> 2. Ports are not broken because they don't easily adapt to some new >> ports framework. >=20 >=20 > We had this attitude in the base towards drivers. It held us back all for t= he sake of hardware that netted us few, if any, users. I fear the same will r= esult if we did this. I understand the point being made here, and the problem is that we abuse the= BROKEN variable. Ports that don=E2=80=99t adapt aren=E2=80=99t necessarily b= roken (unless they no longer build and are actually broken). We have a habit= of using BROKEN to mean =E2=80=9Csomeone should take a look at this.=E2=80=9D= Perhaps we need a better way of signifying this. In the end, though, if nob= ody cares enough about a port to fix it, it is reasonable to remove it (I be= lieve it is Baptiste who says =E2=80=9Cthe ports tree is not a museum=E2=80=9D= ). >> 3. Ports should not be removed without community consultation, which >> should last for at least n months, with m reminders being sent. >=20 >=20 > This is overkill. It was recommended for the driver removal and I said no a= fter trying it a couple of times. After a while they are ignored. We had sup= er poor response after the first warning, and none after the second.=20 >=20 > You are better off deprecating a bunch of ports that aren't maintained. An= d then warning the users every time they boot and/or pkg upgrade. Ideally yo= u'd do it at use, but that is hard. For drivers, we added a whine at attach.= There were a couple people complained about after (one that we reversed cou= rse on), but we've had few complaints for the ones actually removed. >=20 > If no one is even signed up to maintain it, then it's a crapshoot for our u= sers that try to use it. If people are using it, one of them can sign up to g= et problem reports on it. If interest in the port doesn't rise to even that l= ow level of commitment, then we should remove it as uninteresting. In this r= ound of chaos, we'd also have 200 or so people sending in tested changes rat= her than having to have someone grind through them all. And we'd also know w= ho can't be bothered.=20 >=20 > Each additional port isn't free. You have to spend cycles building it. Cyc= les looking at it should the compiler change, etc. The cumulative effect get= s too large even if each individual port isn't too bad. >=20 > Basically, it draws the community back in, even if it's just small ways, r= ather than having them be a pure consumer giving nothing back. Make it easy t= o adopt a port, and we'll grow our base of labor. Make it easy to remove por= ts that no one can be bothered to adopt and we shrink our workload. And we'l= l spend our time on the things that we know net us at least one user who wil= l pledge to keep it going. This is a serious issue that we=E2=80=99ve been dealing with for a long time= . I=E2=80=99ve advocated very strongly for a script that automatically notif= ies the maintainer (+/- ports@?) when a port is marked BROKEN and/or DEPRECA= TED. Community notification is always a good thing, and it opens the door fo= r objections and discussion. Nobody has written such a script, but I would b= e thrilled to help deploy such a script if someone writes it. # Adam =E2=80=94 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 04:37:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CD93CAA49 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfLCn3tyGz4YFr for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 83ABB3CAA48; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8253A3CA851 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mail.gundo.com (gibson.gundo.com [75.145.166.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfLCm0LY5z4YFq; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from webmail.gundo.com (variax.gundo.com [75.145.166.70]) by mail.gundo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DCF4C05E9; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:37:22 -0500 (CDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:37:22 +0000 From: Pau Amma To: Adam Weinberger Cc: Warner Losh , tcberner@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Developers , Michael Gmelin , Niclas Zeising , ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, Greg 'groggy' Lehey Subject: Maintainer notification script (was Re: Aggressive ports removal) In-Reply-To: <4F34C480-63D3-48C4-9747-FDA1E5D66507@adamw.org> References: <4F34C480-63D3-48C4-9747-FDA1E5D66507@adamw.org> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.8 Message-ID: X-Sender: pauamma@gundo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfLCm0LY5z4YFq X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pauamma@gundo.com designates 75.145.166.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pauamma@gundo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pauamma]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[75.145.166.65:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gundo.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.969]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[75.145.166.65:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.67)[-0.665]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.944]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:75.144.0.0/13, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:37:25 -0000 On 2020-08-30 00:50, Adam Weinberger wrote: > [major snip] > This is a serious issue that we’ve been dealing with for a long time. > I’ve advocated very strongly for a script that automatically notifies > the maintainer (+/- ports@?) when a port is marked BROKEN and/or > DEPRECATED. Community notification is always a good thing, and it > opens the door for objections and discussion. Nobody has written such > a script, but I would be thrilled to help deploy such a script if > someone writes it. What would be needed in such a notifier? I imagine it would be called by the post-receive hook in the central git repository-to-be for ports. I'm not very familiar with python or git hooks, but perhaps contrib/hooks/multimail/post-receive.example could be extended or modified and made into (part of) a post-receive hook to: 1- check whether one or more port Makefiles were modified; 2- get from the port Makefiles in step 1 those that have a changed/removed/added BROKEN(_[a-zA-Z0-9_]*)?, DEPRECATED, or EXPIRATION_DATE; 3- email each MAINTAINER= address (for the ports coming out of step 2) using a suitable template. What do others think? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 05:14:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFF03CB0D4 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfM2r16r5z4Zpt for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 248663CB0D2; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244E13CAFFB for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfM2q3ttzz4Zdr for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id h11so1167051ilj.11 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:14:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=2Ou8fK13vLhq1el4HHxW7Q0ZWvfD3L4Re57sJ3XjMvo=; b=pY+Y6ANOhw5/yXMyxSom7LrHoVBN7OoOJEmmgVYKHc217avt9DWkActsrfcucil5hX qp+TeKw+dqSj+Ej+TeJF2OpgoccTKavEexVyizcJWB/1MAQfV1YXC1pmb9OPlJACvgbQ NLozwR+rvibJdyqtnM1jWHYXgrwHBm8zyUfPqjP+LwJl0/Rmy/HS7zIGJI+e+xQiIs/C k7P9VXB0esSIHp+zGKy24FpU56BGDbt3lrN4Tc2aaxKutfhil/CBx7BfaGpTmeGZhnSi CpgQdwj8EYCkrrO+WGLVlaHlO+lfnlldQ0xhnd50nmdOyv3VBOoEO/kQ/gIXLfvzpaPp B6Mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=2Ou8fK13vLhq1el4HHxW7Q0ZWvfD3L4Re57sJ3XjMvo=; b=Qx67V0r1eKEepzAQDfR8ysHGCMFbVBkJZVbsZQZJFBbS6tJwuV72N323ySBbsKqUUg 8poefSdDubiWwOKdCCDDTdBCymjrASeWXRHVZuq97PMytW6633ar+MRHW1J69+d4QsPJ DuULWlnrS0rP8/osCjceDEwXP4dfglPqMfj2C2/VIIvD+kYRzdRBAuVm0yXA6fe9aaIi 68qj5GW8HrRK9a88IJUf+MgkyhGF52GWPsGf8PLANRIG9bOV37zpiP8neL5oYa+nkjh3 1EX+ubFIG6K65ZzmJO1WemMHf7z/Yu6ungmKPUPAzvRGrwWCdzkOkjj0LJ4BhCqBjwKK kh/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hgmB+agxiEpqUP77sdRpbmFtP8dwYlMw88HTamLBJXrVlFreU DdMCji1g5wvAf/kn8jBZ/+7/7w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPhR15Ft3TM0F5bJbZ4HrQrQvruFf0+cv1ZG19c4bMN92R1eQ/pKt2OEp6SIILtxM5b0k0Ag== X-Received: by 2002:a92:444c:: with SMTP id a12mr4568587ilm.143.1598764482598; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:8c3:8100:160f:d1bb:d658:ce7d:45a6? ([2601:8c3:8100:160f:d1bb:d658:ce7d:45a6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17sm4227ilj.72.2020.08.29.22.14.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Adam Weinberger Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Maintainer notification script (was Re: Aggressive ports removal) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:14:40 -0600 Message-Id: References: Cc: Warner Losh , tcberner@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Developers , Michael Gmelin , Niclas Zeising , ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, Greg 'groggy' Lehey In-Reply-To: To: Pau Amma X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17G80) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfM2q3ttzz4Zdr X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=pY+Y6ANO; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::142 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.93 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[adamw]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.924]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::142:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.019]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:14:44 -0000 > On Aug 29, 2020, at 22:37, Pau Amma wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 2020-08-30 00:50, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> [major snip] >> This is a serious issue that we=E2=80=99ve been dealing with for a long t= ime. >> I=E2=80=99ve advocated very strongly for a script that automatically noti= fies >> the maintainer (+/- ports@?) when a port is marked BROKEN and/or >> DEPRECATED. Community notification is always a good thing, and it >> opens the door for objections and discussion. Nobody has written such >> a script, but I would be thrilled to help deploy such a script if >> someone writes it. >=20 > What would be needed in such a notifier? I imagine it would be called by t= he post-receive hook in the central git repository-to-be for ports. I'm not v= ery familiar with python or git hooks, but perhaps contrib/hooks/multimail/p= ost-receive.example could be extended or modified and made into (part of) a p= ost-receive hook to: > 1- check whether one or more port Makefiles were modified; > 2- get from the port Makefiles in step 1 those that have a changed/removed= /added BROKEN(_[a-zA-Z0-9_]*)?, DEPRECATED, or EXPIRATION_DATE; > 3- email each MAINTAINER=3D address (for the ports coming out of step 2) u= sing a suitable template. In my mind, commit hooks are there to perform tasks that the repo cannot fun= ction without, as fragility in a commit hook could bring down the whole tree= . But perhaps I am giving the commit hooks too much credit here? Perhaps we could sweep the tree at certain intervals and notify maintainers w= hen a new entry is added. # Adam =E2=80=94 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 05:48:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC783CBDDB for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfMnx0MWKz4c2L for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0C3333CBDDA; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6833CBEC0 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mail.gundo.com (gibson.gundo.com [75.145.166.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfMnw2Hqmz4blH; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from webmail.gundo.com (variax.gundo.com [75.145.166.70]) by mail.gundo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109544C05E9; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 00:48:35 -0500 (CDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:34 +0000 From: Pau Amma To: Adam Weinberger Cc: Warner Losh , tcberner@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Developers , Michael Gmelin , Niclas Zeising , ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, Greg 'groggy' Lehey Subject: Re: Maintainer notification script (was Re: Aggressive ports removal) In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.8 Message-ID: <83dbff194c67404b94031364c0fd7d82@gundo.com> X-Sender: pauamma@gundo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfMnw2Hqmz4blH X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pauamma@gundo.com designates 75.145.166.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pauamma@gundo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.960]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pauamma]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gundo.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.973]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[75.145.166.65:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[75.145.166.65:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.73)[-0.730]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:75.144.0.0/13, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:37 -0000 On 2020-08-30 05:14, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2020, at 22:37, Pau Amma wrote: >> >> On 2020-08-30 00:50, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> [major snip] >>> This is a serious issue that we’ve been dealing with for a long time. >>> I’ve advocated very strongly for a script that automatically notifies >>> the maintainer (+/- ports@?) when a port is marked BROKEN and/or >>> DEPRECATED. Community notification is always a good thing, and it >>> opens the door for objections and discussion. Nobody has written such >>> a script, but I would be thrilled to help deploy such a script if >>> someone writes it. >> >> What would be needed in such a notifier? I imagine it would be called >> by the post-receive hook in the central git repository-to-be for >> ports. I'm not very familiar with python or git hooks, but perhaps >> contrib/hooks/multimail/post-receive.example could be extended or >> modified and made into (part of) a post-receive hook to: >> 1- check whether one or more port Makefiles were modified; >> 2- get from the port Makefiles in step 1 those that have a >> changed/removed/added BROKEN(_[a-zA-Z0-9_]*)?, DEPRECATED, or >> EXPIRATION_DATE; >> 3- email each MAINTAINER= address (for the ports coming out of step 2) >> using a suitable template. > > In my mind, commit hooks are there to perform tasks that the repo > cannot function without, as fragility in a commit hook could bring > down the whole tree. But perhaps I am giving the commit hooks too much > credit here? Well, git help hook says: post-receive This hook is invoked by git-receive-pack(1) when it reacts to git push and updates reference(s) in its repository. It executes on the remote repository once after all the refs have been updated. This hook executes once for the receive operation. It takes no arguments, but gets the same information as the pre-receive hook does on its standard input. This hook does not affect the outcome of git receive-pack, as it is called after the real work is done. [...] But perhaps I'm reading too much about the (lack of) consequences for failures from that specific hook into that. > Perhaps we could sweep the tree at certain intervals and notify > maintainers when a new entry is added. Perhaps. How is the "comment on Bugzilla PR with commit log message" feature currently implemented? Or how will the git implementation work, if that's different? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 01:49:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B95D3C3EFC for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 01:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfGVM0C6Nz4Mwf for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 01:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 06DDB3C41E2; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 01:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A503C4527 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 01:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfGVK5dzQz4Mt1; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 01:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6929A5C00CD; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:49:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap36 ([10.202.2.86]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:49:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=langille.org; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=od/32dKK5isMcYXABVZKVUnLRZJ0uLi QDsleCYIhLX8=; b=HdqyaYb0J+wMV8ehGYmObhvWZv7KvBvQiFtUFivUtLJEl+j LH9PUTAAriptEBdUdIXfDv1SKkvHWOEplDuQO+gltH0mVZwtj1Wih+Jw0dcM8b5/ 7Sfnrh0IpMgBL4T/zuLg0duSsVhI/GMmGGWKtYZKzg/lNSNzo9/Qes/vOCOk3255 Gj94g0tbZ9CtF5C243yfqArO3T9W3kUNzGyLV/4Oz31mAg1nDRCFw5Q0ygd6QIjt KFW8sqoQRu8zbyDVIC+KEokOirSla7Gr3Wveyo3YzNKpQ04IDhNhXZzLj3ShE5aW 7R+r6yyvXGstBxkhLxw8nbu87l+2vMtKwDnlusg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=od/32d KK5isMcYXABVZKVUnLRZJ0uLiQDsleCYIhLX8=; b=i8UemiNJQSQXJLOgP4wwwP VgQcq1Oo6AMHJv5iW7AKikF+MkQTB7chHlY6qRQOIGaS4S5SXF4OSR7wL6BK2bmD n/cYfuQTRrrIAiCovfyZ3NB0AKof+2Oxw4Y01Jb45/zKOOR5dOHXj3zu1zF019Ad wzOOOn5HhcaWKdpL6y8Nf94oYV+1vGIVOrq0y+3bac89ab6jScIESRO5xihKwnIa 6vcC+MdRxdrkJt3xSxHeDP30AUBQHuXvKaJ9nRcpd/dHjavmd7gLc823gbipPfAc ZEKmiqJtbiBose2HC6lfsGbrSXX8UwF5w5VykNn436EgYzlZ+XkK6P/we5xxfU9w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudefvddgheduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdffrghn ucfnrghnghhilhhlvgdfuceouggrnheslhgrnhhgihhllhgvrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefhtdethfevffffleeufffgffetieevveetieefgfffkeffuedtffeutdei teevtdenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggrnheslhgrnhhgihhllhgvrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id CEFE3188007B; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:49:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-232-g4bdb081-fm-20200825.002-g4bdb081a Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4F34C480-63D3-48C4-9747-FDA1E5D66507@adamw.org> References: <4F34C480-63D3-48C4-9747-FDA1E5D66507@adamw.org> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:49:23 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" To: "Adam Weinberger" , "Warner Losh" Cc: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_E=C3=9Fer?= , "Niclas Zeising" , "Michael Gmelin" , "FreeBSD Developers" , "Tobias C. Berner" , ports@freebsd.org, "portmgr@freebsd.org" Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Aggressive_ports_removal_(was:_svn_commit:_r546907_-_head/?= =?UTF-8?Q?x11-clocks/wmtime)?= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfGVK5dzQz4Mt1 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=langille.org header.s=fm2 header.b=HdqyaYb0; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=i8UemiNJ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=langille.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan@langille.org designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan@langille.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[66.111.4.27:from]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[langille.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[langille.org,none]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; SUBJ_EXCESS_QP(1.20)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.73)[-1.728]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.27:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[langille.org:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[dan]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.985]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 06:37:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 01:49:47 -0000 On Sat, Aug 29, 2020, at 8:50 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Just a disclaimer: I=E2=80=99m speaking for myself here, not on behalf= of portmgr@. Also please keep in mind that I am perpetually, pathologic= ally optimistic. >=20 >> On Aug 29, 2020, at 18:01, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> Basically, it draws the community back in, even if it's just small wa= ys, rather than having them be a pure consumer giving nothing back. Make= it easy to adopt a port, and we'll grow our base of labor. Make it easy= to remove ports that no one can be bothered to adopt and we shrink our = workload. And we'll spend our time on the things that we know net us at = least one user who will pledge to keep it going. >=20 > This is a serious issue that we=E2=80=99ve been dealing with for a lon= g time. I=E2=80=99ve advocated very strongly for a script that automatic= ally notifies the maintainer (+/- ports@?) when a port is marked BROKEN = and/or DEPRECATED. Community notification is always a good thing, and it= opens the door for objections and discussion. Nobody has written such a= script, but I would be thrilled to help deploy such a script if someone= writes it. In the meantime, FreshPorts has a 'Watch ports I maintain' report under = 'Watch ports I maintain' re https://github.com/FreshPorts/freshports/issues/138 -- Dan Langille dan@langille.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 04:58:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12493CAF2F for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:58:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfLhR4LKBz4Yr7 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:58:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 931593CB082; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B8C3CABCA for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:58:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfLhQ6ZVXz4YmS for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id z25so198319iol.10 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:58:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Y3aoPoKH89tbqSCPmzdze+7/SDF6QnxL00/UNvwKEM8=; b=VTfBKMO+5AbH5c+gBhDvS8xzW/vaEIgp1JU4PY+UWtDhCCUt86Ok+nDgjU24TghNT4 eFbKC0lfROw8bTBEJQVYcrOiyAMXabstQaHGxlnkm+lUz+WhJAT3DvG4vx8q9PQJBmDT xmOX0l2XBpC2p5oxdrfTXBwq+UnQeNvOo0Xzdi2SstkNDcYKSVaIlBUVz3ot8NP1t6xA 8QaNjo2sW61sM2RqvL8MVJLvRDe24nxj5PLZ1QPH8zsT0luOCJb6S9t7yJI9AZwRMcHO FxWJWXTHYnjUxGz1clBTe4GTrE1qsviDuZTY9coFydWtiqm9464RCLSyRTYfCGcP5UzY RMFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Y3aoPoKH89tbqSCPmzdze+7/SDF6QnxL00/UNvwKEM8=; b=d8SnHRgTX0mmr6nH/MZhdIvCzloGIonGANuffaJM8hl5h3lISl4riH77i8Guw8LYng /MjgRdx1hs1R4a4RVsvEdNc9Ebdc5X2a1naHrZWAye0DSomTtkFlNjHjOv2tH8cCZtLd GpGbMp9MWHJ62sCVxd3eNCE5fg0J663x+U5fsLu5CYC0CxLUE/mOwNzza4r1L2aJ2/yM mmcGrK4ULZhjJuiO4QP1uVZX4eQ6Lo7ktZQqen4fNO6AgdME3XnfjY38rk935OLnTQiT X6dqLwiurCmBJmWIMyIUthvzVp0KThfyRlUqI3G3OZZrRMoTnDaOLxVYSyvNqC5gGH1R JnVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rYNFj2wUkyO1BeNJgAUFSLjPpEHzjLpJlJpuBpl3jMgl1fCoN 9OC/KhNAxE62w4NDEUTKjJUn4Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8u/ROPBdCU/p8yTK1kmSXe4Z37ZhclNeXtpl5L+O5hzaYxbV87L/IX0ZMPajC+O9eEKnc8A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:d4f:: with SMTP id d15mr7054667jak.119.1598763525713; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:8c3:8100:160f:d1bb:d658:ce7d:45a6? ([2601:8c3:8100:160f:d1bb:d658:ce7d:45a6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j62sm2121487iof.53.2020.08.29.21.58.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Adam Weinberger Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal (was: svn commit: r546907 - head/x11-clocks/wmtime) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:58:43 -0600 Message-Id: References: <20200830023352.GA14065@lonesome.com> Cc: Warner Losh , Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Stefan Esser , Niclas Zeising , Michael Gmelin , FreeBSD Developers , tcberner@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20200830023352.GA14065@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17G80) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfLhQ6ZVXz4YmS X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=VTfBKMO+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.93 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[adamw]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.922]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.019]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 06:37:47 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:58:47 -0000 > On Aug 29, 2020, at 20:33, Mark Linimon wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 06:50:22PM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> the problem is that we abuse the BROKEN variable. Ports that don't >> adapt aren't necessarily broken (unless they no longer build and are >> actually broken). We have a habit of using BROKEN to mean "someone >> should take a look at this." Perhaps we need a better way of >> signifying this. >=20 > Hmm, I though that was what DEPRECATED was for? The semantics are a little different. There=E2=80=99s nothing to differentia= te things that we have confidently deprecated, vs things that we=E2=80=99d l= ike people to please take a look at before we give up on it. I think part of= the resistance to marking things for expiration is that we lump =E2=80=9Cth= is no longer has a purpose=E2=80=9D in with =E2=80=9Cplease give this some T= LC or we=E2=80=99ll let it go.=E2=80=9D # Adam =E2=80=94 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 08:28:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C453AAC22 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfRL66N6pz4tf6 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DAC7D3AA8F1; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9303AA953 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfRL63TFGz4tf5; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfRL42n6Wz3n08; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id Ax6X94Mf5C2Y; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vivi.daemonic.se (vivi.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1200::4]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BfRL33PG5z3myt; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Cc: FreeBSD Developers , ports@freebsd.org References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:28:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfRL63TFGz4tf5 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:28:15 -0000 On 2020-08-30 01:27, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Sorry for the length of the quotes, but I've added people who might > not have seen the (relatively long) thread on this subject. This > seems the best message to refer to. >=20 > On Saturday, 29 August 2020 at 16:09:12 +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 29.08.20 um 15:32 schrieb Niclas Zeising: >>> On 2020-08-29 14:48, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>>> As I???ve seen quite a lot of similar commits: >>>> >>>> Is our policy now to deprecate ports (with one month notice) that >>>> aren???t maintained/have a dead upstream, even though the ports stil= l >>>> work okay and aren???t the type that requires much maintenance anywa= y? >>>> >>> >>> Hi! >>> As far as I know, there is no official policy, this was something tha= t >>> Tobias (tcberner@) and I (mostly I) agreed on, since we're doing a lo= t >>> of the lifting when it comes to -fno-common. >>> >>> However, there is a lot of stale, old, unmaintained and possibly brok= en >>> software in the Ports tree, and I viewed this as a chance to clean ou= t >>> some of the cruft.=A0 All these ports take resources from people need= ing >>> to fix them, from the build cluster which is building them, and so on= . >>> Since there is no upstream fix for -fno-common, and there is no >>> maintainer, I thought it would be a good idea to deprecate such ports= , >>> since there is no apparent interest in them.=A0 -fno-common is the ne= w >>> standard way of building C code (both llvm 11 and gcc 10 defaults to >>> it).=A0 If someone is interested in the port, they can easily submit = a PR >>> to maintain the port and remove the deprecation (or commit the fix, i= f >>> they are a FreeBSD committer). >>> If they are removed, and someone in the future decides to take care o= f >>> one (or more) of them, they can easily be resurrected, since they wil= l >>> live on in SVN (and git) history. >> >> No maintainer and no changes for a long time does not imply that there >> is no interest in a port! >> >> If it just works, serves its purpose for those using a minimal X11 >> environment (there are still twm users) and there is no indication >> of a lingering security problem, then why depreciate and later delete >> such a working port? >=20 > Exactly. Another case in point: x11/xtset. Maintenance stopped in > 1993, 11 days after the FreeBSD project came into existence. It works > fine, and I find it very useful. If at some time in the future it > should no longer work with the latest and greatest iteration of the C > programming language or ports structure, that shouldn't be a reason to > discard it. Then it is very easy. If it is useful to you, adopt it as maintainer,=20 then you will get a notification if it fails to build, and you can fix=20 the issue(s), instead of trusting that someone has the time and energy=20 to fix it. At the same time you indicate that there is actually some=20 interest in the port. We set deprecation dates in the future so that interested parties should=20 have a chance to speak up. >=20 > My suggestion: >=20 > 1. Decisions to deprecate remove ports should be made only by > portmgr@. This is like saying you don't trust ports developers. Any work on the=20 ports tree would grind to a complete halt. > 2. Ports are not broken because they don't easily adapt to some new > ports framework. This is simply not true. Ports that don't adopt to a new ports=20 framework are broken. New ports frameworks are developed to ease in=20 porting, packaging or to improve or simplify ports, the same way as new=20 kernel or base frameworks are invented. Things that do not comply with=20 the new way of things are hindering progress and updates, and need to be=20 either adapted or removed. It is exactly the same as for instance the removal of the Giant lock.=20 The difference might be the rate of change. Since FreeBSD base has=20 fixed releases and stable branches, but the ports tree mostly a rolling=20 release model (that has to work on 3-4 different FreeBSD versions at the=20 same time) the rate of change in the ports tree are necessarily higher. > 3. Ports should not be removed without community consultation, which > should last for at least n months, with m reminders being sent. I agree with the reminders. Every time you install a deprecated port or=20 package you'll get just such a notification. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 15:48:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6DE3BF958 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfd613rv5z46q2 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07UFmUOn054004 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:48:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07UFmUYQ054003; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:48:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:48:29 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: bob prohaska Subject: Silent stoppage building www/chromium Message-ID: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bfd613rv5z46q2 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.34 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.81)[-0.811]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.81)[-0.810]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.06)[0.057]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:48:26 -0000 Trying again to compile www/chromium on a Pi3B. Ports are at 546965, system is at r364900. Root is a USB mechanical hard disk, with swap on both hard disk and microSD. Something, not sure what, seems to stall silently. The host is still responsive, but sluggish, as if something is very busy. Top reports last pid: 4819; load averages: 2.65, 2.33, 1.78 up 0+14:24:26 08:40:45 52 processes: 2 running, 50 sleeping CPU: 55.2% user, 0.0% nice, 3.2% system, 1.2% interrupt, 40.4% idle Mem: 300M Active, 120M Inact, 28M Laundry, 176M Wired, 98M Buf, 280M Free Swap: 6042M Total, 589M Used, 5453M Free, 9% Inuse, 724K In PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 3264 root 1 21 0 20M 644K select 2 0:00 0.00% sshd 4720 root 1 52 0 13M 0B wait 2 0:00 0.00% 928 root 1 52 0 13M 424K ttyin 0 0:00 0.00% getty 97 root 1 52 0 12M 0B pause 0 0:00 0.00% 929 root 1 52 0 13M 424K ttyin 2 0:00 0.00% getty 961 bob 1 20 0 13M 0B wait 1 0:00 0.00% 4802 root 5 22 0 245M 130M uwait 3 4:54 99.87% rustc 4818 root 1 23 0 113M 53M wait 0 0:01 0.00% clang-9 722 root 1 20 0 13M 784K select 2 0:01 0.00% syslogd 866 root 1 20 0 20M 572K select 3 0:01 0.00% sshd 930 root 1 52 0 13M 424K ttyin 3 0:00 0.00% getty 962 root 1 20 0 14M 0B pause 3 0:00 0.00% 3267 bob 1 20 0 20M 824K select 0 0:00 0.00% sshd 4595 bob 1 20 0 13M 0B wait 2 0:00 0.00% Gstat reports dT: 1.013s w: 1.000s L(q) ops/s r/s kBps ms/r w/s kBps ms/w %busy Name 0 44 44 265 1.5 0 0 0.0 6.8| mmcsd0 1 38 38 178 19.2 0 0 0.0 67.7| da0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| mmcsd0s1 0 44 44 265 1.6 0 0 0.0 7.2| mmcsd0s2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| msdosfs/MSDOSBOOT 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| mmcsd0s2a 0 44 44 265 1.7 0 0 0.0 7.3| mmcsd0s2b 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ufsid/5bbd5a23da8b6195 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ufs/rootfs 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| da0s1 1 38 38 178 19.3 0 0 0.0 67.9| da0s2 0 2 2 12 35.6 0 0 0.0 7.0| da0s2a 1 37 37 166 18.4 0 0 0.0 67.2| da0s2b Both swap devices are busy, but neither seems saturated and much higher swap usage has been observed before without the system getting stuck. If anybody can suggest something to try or explore please do. Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 15:49:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7036A3BF8C9 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfd7D4tQlz46vr for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07UFndw2054027 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07UFndGb054026 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:49:38 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Silent stoppage building www/chromium Message-ID: <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> References: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bfd7D4tQlz46vr X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.04 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.094]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.27)[0.267]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.78)[0.777]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:49:29 -0000 Apologies, the port in question is www/firefox, not www/chromium. Sorry for the write-o, bob From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 16:15:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAB53C0820 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfdjK44Ryz48j8 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (unknown [181.52.72.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pfg) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4003424B7D for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) To: FreeBSD Ports From: Pedro Giffuni Subject: math/reduce: could use some help with recent current failure Autocrypt: addr=pfg@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQENBFU6tr0BCAC/MABNSg8O9sLZZ1cCl8GczwjnyF6WEvtfLpIkAWEo49H3TuG3cMNwuavi xnwASLS73ppj6ziWK1QsfdAaA8Mkvk25UtenfsCTiA38q0RwvHPn8W6eorJ6rYHRReNnncA+ oPLrLmL6IOUK9dlcLJP5i45PGwpx9YNI+D/BFcji7enpnsGjunhRE3NJ1YBXiKMormfnPvpV yVWpKnnB03nFIQphW108G5U9wytZqsiGkshn0ar0FBGsdJ19d/ePBuMceaWRtf0nJrNkC9sB D8ISmFp6/DAoQBhyJxvemC83/QNV5u9kGdwemaKOJ6SdAmBBZYbdAxCO8i/Eq33mrXx7ABEB AAG0H1BlZHJvIEdpZmZ1bmkgPHBmZ0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz6JATcEEwEKACEFAlU6tr0CGwMF CwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgMCAQACHgECF4AACgkQzWsLls7yLQTFEgf/blVvg7MPpZp/KWwEShqI VpkJLhXLjvYzjoSCrpuVtNMCdpYh3L6gY5mBr9VASc/iWb6DUUxX9g6oLQ4l1e8eEwSHdXda RG/NjxJhz8dsLO8H6dnwl6HEZ+nymXIibX6GGy10gQeyv6sNGsgSCwlyFJZcv2lW2M1ev11w 3yY1eQnIsPq4vyIMYEQ1aIIYu1JPNEzRZ7sDuRGdnvMH7FhHaNzSs8d4PHw2JSwDHPuN/W6S UhK+A/TDW9BQ4ZzDRpKrIPfWqkAa+76NtGglmJWS99WG7rJAoPUIj2xpzojoQbT3z1vbeGxK cgGvOyQMlrJSRZwOtFuhcdbQ6DX4ETI7NrkBDQRVOra9AQgA1ACQK5u/H1MgjSKXQttCv8Kz /k7fHmaWLrhPAJH6bqR7wpv/Hz2y/8uD+5qg/vk9/pwYuj9TzbCXs9NeWye/+DV8Aw7Z22b2 OjB0VbEpHREDs0zS+0KMP7STOPpyHVYdgWCQ7Qgd/LG0gfUP5M0R8s2OH3Il8rcS4ZeEd/tr O3LyoDiK4mInT/X3oJX7xetws3jpSPk51TDOplamehXjndwemttUTw1czITF9MfDosaihoUr o6NcAtBzFYIF2NuKhrASs9prec+e36a3lCUbMOHof62TnBZZnWtNdmnv1RNv3q17yavqi0F/ rvtmckHhJ8NcnYL8/gGD48nhKf60UQARAQABiQEfBBgBCgAJBQJVOra9AhsMAAoJEM1rC5bO 8i0EkGAH+QG/1y0mcOBFsouMdmDUpRusRxWHdmdIjFt4FJ2/K7YDyrliKcUTOp+zjCyfLVE6 UELiRvsT+mg4QcZL7e+JAuLkW5LhiAskz8/1fRgnwVquTcYd7TPJrYnejpLyumhbsgo0bN4G s9yrJeQpKbln6YQxifzT4Eqot3aEeZxlUEKzQd0Vq1ci8PTI1krvda9x+FdGvKxY9Iz4T+SW NZsvBaCXo9hjJZ7U1VaCdWxgHhy5tuTuMAGGS9lCGbdvdKuAbSQDtcvx0jcY5s7Q2t2udCyV mRDbQYrl8PEyJa3Cz3NoBD9g9EEr9PlX05hOWMVf3M5pS4j/XKbzUbKqiBy1VPw= Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <9e9a7bfd-a936-9e8c-846f-cf929451910e@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:15:32 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:15:33 -0000 Hello; math/reduce appears broken on pkg-fallout due to the recent LLVM upgrade.= It seems like an lld issue: > ld: error: duplicate symbol: MeToReduce >>>> defined at redchild.c >>>> rfpsl-redchild.o:(MeToReduce) >>>> defined at reddeb.c >>>> rfpsl-reddeb.o:(.bss+0x4) > ld: error: duplicate symbol: ReduceToMe Also, I have an updated port here: https://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/ports/math-reduce.diff I have tried both -fno-common and LLVM11 but I can't reproduce the failure, so if someone with -current wants to try, it would be helpful. Best regards, Pedro. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 18:13:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867043C43A3 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfhKF00PKz4Hx0 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E71743C4071; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64DD3C426C for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dreamchaser.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfhKD1f1Zz4HtX; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07UIDIFK090236; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:13:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal To: Niclas Zeising , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Cc: FreeBSD Developers , ports@freebsd.org References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org From: Gary Aitken Message-ID: <3ef2fdf3-c746-2f57-ec2f-2f8784bfd5ce@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:11:55 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:13:18 -0600 (MDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfhKD1f1Zz4HtX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21947, ipnet:66.109.128.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:13:21 -0000 On 8/30/20 2:28 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2020-08-30 01:27, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> Sorry for the length of the quotes, but I've added people who >> might not have seen the (relatively long) thread on this subject. >> This seems the best message to refer to. >> >> On Saturday, 29 August 2020 at 16:09:12 +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >>> Am 29.08.20 um 15:32 schrieb Niclas Zeising: >>>> On 2020-08-29 14:48, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>>>> As I???ve seen quite a lot of similar commits: >>>>> >>>>> Is our policy now to deprecate ports (with one month notice) >>>>> that aren???t maintained/have a dead upstream, even though >>>>> the ports still work okay and aren???t the type that requires >>>>> much maintenance anyway? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi! As far as I know, there is no official policy, this was >>>> something that Tobias (tcberner@) and I (mostly I) agreed on, >>>> since we're doing a lot of the lifting when it comes to >>>> -fno-common. >>>> >>>> However, there is a lot of stale, old, unmaintained and >>>> possibly broken software in the Ports tree, and I viewed this >>>> as a chance to clean out some of the cruft. All these ports >>>> take resources from people needing to fix them, from the build >>>> cluster which is building them, and so on. Since there is no >>>> upstream fix for -fno-common, and there is no maintainer, I >>>> thought it would be a good idea to deprecate such ports, since >>>> there is no apparent interest in them. -fno-common is the new >>>> standard way of building C code (both llvm 11 and gcc 10 >>>> defaults to it). If someone is interested in the port, they >>>> can easily submit a PR to maintain the port and remove the >>>> deprecation (or commit the fix, if they are a FreeBSD >>>> committer). If they are removed, and someone in the future >>>> decides to take care of one (or more) of them, they can easily >>>> be resurrected, since they will live on in SVN (and git) >>>> history. >>> >>> No maintainer and no changes for a long time does not imply that >>> there is no interest in a port! >>> >>> If it just works, serves its purpose for those using a minimal >>> X11 environment (there are still twm users) and there is no >>> indication of a lingering security problem, then why depreciate >>> and later delete such a working port? >> >> Exactly. Another case in point: x11/xtset. Maintenance stopped >> in 1993, 11 days after the FreeBSD project came into existence. It >> works fine, and I find it very useful. If at some time in the >> future it should no longer work with the latest and greatest >> iteration of the C programming language or ports structure, that >> shouldn't be a reason to discard it. > > Then it is very easy. If it is useful to you, adopt it as > maintainer, then you will get a notification if it fails to build, > and you can fix the issue(s), instead of trusting that someone has > the time and energy to fix it. At the same time you indicate that > there is actually some interest in the port. We set deprecation dates > in the future so that interested parties should have a chance to > speak up. > >> >> My suggestion: >> >> 1. Decisions to deprecate remove ports should be made only by >> portmgr@. > > This is like saying you don't trust ports developers. Any work on > the ports tree would grind to a complete halt. > >> 2. Ports are not broken because they don't easily adapt to some >> new ports framework. > > This is simply not true. Ports that don't adopt to a new ports > framework are broken. New ports frameworks are developed to ease in > porting, packaging or to improve or simplify ports, the same way as > new kernel or base frameworks are invented. Things that do not > comply with the new way of things are hindering progress and updates, > and need to be either adapted or removed. It is exactly the same as > for instance the removal of the Giant lock. The difference might be > the rate of change. Since FreeBSD base has fixed releases and stable > branches, but the ports tree mostly a rolling release model (that has > to work on 3-4 different FreeBSD versions at the same time) the rate > of change in the ports tree are necessarily higher. > >> 3. Ports should not be removed without community consultation, >> which should last for at least n months, with m reminders being >> sent. > > I agree with the reminders. Every time you install a deprecated port > or package you'll get just such a notification. Regards I don't know how easy this would be to implement, but it would be very useful to know which ports are actually being built and installed. How difficult would it be to have pkg install and the make install script do some counting and a cron job forward the counts to freebsd.org? That would give a much better sense of how useful a port is. Yes, it's inaccurate given rebuilds, upgrades, etc., but if a port shows zero installs for several years it seems like it could be sidelined. Gary From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 18:53:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D66A3C5689 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfjCp3G3cz4LQZ for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6FDFC3C5687; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA763C5686 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfjCp07NQz4L40; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-73-189-35-76.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.189.35.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 07UIrWkO006507 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:53:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-73-189-35-76.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.189.35.76] claimed to be yv.noip.me Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal To: FreeBSD Developers , ports@freebsd.org Cc: Warner Losh , freebsd@dreamchaser.org, Niclas Zeising , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> <3ef2fdf3-c746-2f57-ec2f-2f8784bfd5ce@dreamchaser.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:53:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfjCp07NQz4L40 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 18:53:42 -0000 On 2020-08-30 11:20, Warner Losh wrote: > > I don't know how easy this would be to implement, but it would be very > useful > to know which ports are actually being built and installed.  How difficult This is already implemented in the BSDstats project (sysutils/bsdstats). It does such accounting for hosts that have BSDstats installed. It shows stats on it's webpage https://bsdstats.org/ However, not many people are willing to install sysutils/bsdstats, or know about it, so it only counts based on a tiny fraction of hosts running FreeBSD. Best, Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 19:41:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A7D3C736A for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfkGc355dz4Nxm for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 69F3B3C72CE; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BBD3C70AF for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dreamchaser.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfkGc0Nmdz4P0w; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:41:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07UJf8Xm090454; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 13:41:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal To: Yuri , FreeBSD Developers , ports@freebsd.org Cc: Warner Losh , Niclas Zeising , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> <3ef2fdf3-c746-2f57-ec2f-2f8784bfd5ce@dreamchaser.org> From: Gary Aitken Message-ID: <3c5b533e-ae3b-5c8d-7ad9-9ea2013ee5e5@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 13:39:45 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 13:41:08 -0600 (MDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfkGc0Nmdz4P0w X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21947, ipnet:66.109.128.0/19, country:US]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:41:12 -0000 On 8/30/20 12:20 PM, Warner Losh wrote:> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 12:13 PM Gary Aitken > wrote: > > I don't know how easy this would be to implement, but it would be > very useful to know which ports are actually being built and > installed. How difficult would it be to have pkg install and the > make install script do some counting and a cron job forward the > counts to freebsd.org ? That would give a much > better sense of how useful a port is. Yes, it's inaccurate given > rebuilds, upgrades, etc., but if a port shows zero installs for > several years it seems like it could be sidelined. > > The issue here is more social than technical. Most people don't want > to disclose this information. On 8/30/20 12:53 PM, Yuri wrote: > > This is already implemented in the BSDstats project > (sysutils/bsdstats). It does such accounting for hosts that have > BSDstats installed. It shows stats on it's webpage > https://bsdstats.org/ > > However, not many people are willing to install sysutils/bsdstats, > or know about it, so it only counts based on a tiny fraction of > hosts running FreeBSD. Thanks, I didn't realize port info was reported by bsdstats. However, the ports link at the bottom doesn't work. Also, the Release Stats link at both the top and bottom seems to change to point at the last page displayed. Should I file a bug report? Gary From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 19:54:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278753C7914 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfkZD0HJ2z4PjQ for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 097F73C7912; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094B63C7911 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfkZC2TBDz4PrD; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-73-189-35-76.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.189.35.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 07UJsaTR017272 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:54:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-73-189-35-76.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.189.35.76] claimed to be yv.noip.me Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org, FreeBSD Developers , ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Warner Losh , Niclas Zeising , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> <3ef2fdf3-c746-2f57-ec2f-2f8784bfd5ce@dreamchaser.org> <3c5b533e-ae3b-5c8d-7ad9-9ea2013ee5e5@dreamchaser.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: <18a004b1-5d2a-e58c-d690-82e04ba683be@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:54:35 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3c5b533e-ae3b-5c8d-7ad9-9ea2013ee5e5@dreamchaser.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfkZC2TBDz4PrD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:44 -0000 On 2020-08-30 12:39, Gary Aitken wrote: > > Should I file a bug report? Yes, please create a bug report for the port "sysutils/bsdstats". I believe that its current maintainer also runs the BSDstats website. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 20:26:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE6F3C8C5B for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BflHG5w1mz4W9K for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C92503C8B68; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EB03C8D80 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dreamchaser.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BflHG26LPz4WNT; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07UKQlnc091029; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:26:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal To: Yuri , FreeBSD Developers , ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Warner Losh , Niclas Zeising , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> <3ef2fdf3-c746-2f57-ec2f-2f8784bfd5ce@dreamchaser.org> <3c5b533e-ae3b-5c8d-7ad9-9ea2013ee5e5@dreamchaser.org> <18a004b1-5d2a-e58c-d690-82e04ba683be@rawbw.com> From: Gary Aitken Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:25:24 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18a004b1-5d2a-e58c-d690-82e04ba683be@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:26:47 -0600 (MDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BflHG26LPz4WNT X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21947, ipnet:66.109.128.0/19, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:26:51 -0000 On 8/30/20 1:54 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 2020-08-30 12:39, Gary Aitken wrote: >> >> Should I file a bug report? > > Yes, please create a bug report for the port "sysutils/bsdstats". I > believe that its current maintainer also runs the BSDstats website. #249019 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 21:06:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD56B3CA9D8 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bfm8s4Gvsz4Z4Z for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 919103CA9D7; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915223CAB17 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfm8s3LvNz4ZLr for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF67E1CADE for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07UL6K44019735 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:20 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07UL6K8A019734 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:20 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:20 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202008302106.07UL6K8A019734@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:06:21 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/py-medikit: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/py-pip-tools4 Committers on the hook: danfe decke dmgk eugen pkubaj sunpoet tobik Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U devel/py-apispec/Makefile U devel/py-apispec/distinfo U devel/ipython/Makefile U devel/ipython/distinfo U devel/p5-MooseX-MethodAttributes/Makefile U devel/p5-MooseX-MethodAttributes/distinfo U devel/p5-File-LibMagic/Makefile U devel/p5-File-LibMagic/distinfo U devel/p5-DateTime-Format-ISO8601/Makefile U devel/p5-Alien-Base-ModuleBuild/Makefile U devel/p5-Alien-Base-ModuleBuild/distinfo U devel/rubygem-sentry-raven/Makefile U devel/rubygem-sentry-raven/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-route53/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-route53/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-emr/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-emr/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ec2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ec2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-costandusagereportservice/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-costandusagereportservice/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-cloudfront/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-cloudfront/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-partitions/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-partitions/distinfo U devel/py-protobuf/Makefile U devel/py-protobuf/distinfo U devel/py-prompt_toolkit/Makefile U devel/py-prompt_toolkit/distinfo U devel/py-more-itertools/Makefile U devel/py-more-itertools/distinfo U devel/py-medikit/Makefile U devel/py-hypothesis/Makefile U devel/py-hypothesis/distinfo D devel/py-dateutils/files U devel/py-dateutils/Makefile U devel/py-dateutils/distinfo U devel/py-dask/Makefile U devel/py-dask/distinfo U devel/py-cmd2/Makefile U devel/py-cmd2/distinfo U devel/py-cachecontrol/Makefile U devel/p5-DateTime-Locale/Makefile U devel/p5-DateTime-Locale/distinfo U devel/bloaty/Makefile U devel/google-cloud-cpp/Makefile U devel/grpc/Makefile U devel/ignition-msgs/Makefile U devel/libphonenumber/Makefile U devel/protobuf-c/Makefile U devel/protobuf/Makefile U devel/protobuf/distinfo U devel/protobuf/pkg-plist U devel/Makefile A devel/py-csv23 A devel/py-csv23/Makefile A devel/py-csv23/distinfo A devel/py-csv23/pkg-descr U devel/bingrep/Makefile U devel/cargo-c/Makefile U devel/desed/Makefile U devel/dtool/Makefile U devel/gbump/Makefile U devel/git-absorb/Makefile U devel/git-delta/Makefile U devel/gitui/Makefile U devel/interactive_rebase_tool/Makefile U devel/pijul/Makefile U devel/racer/Makefile U devel/rust-analyzer/Makefile U devel/rust-bindgen/Makefile U devel/rust-cbindgen/Makefile U devel/sccache/Makefile U devel/sentry-cli/Makefile A devel/sentry-cli/files/patch-rust1460 U devel/tokei/Makefile U devel/gogs/Makefile U devel/gogs/distinfo A devel/gogs/files/patch-internal_route_install.go U devel/gogs/pkg-plist U shells/bash-completion/Makefile U shells/ion/Makefile U shells/starship/Makefile U databases/p5-DBIx-Class-ResultSet-RecursiveUpdate/Makefile U databases/p5-DBIx-Class-ResultSet-RecursiveUpdate/distinfo U databases/p5-DBD-SQLite/Makefile U databases/p5-DBD-SQLite/distinfo U databases/rubygem-dbf/Makefile U databases/rubygem-dbf/distinfo U databases/p5-PostgreSQL-PLPerl-Call/Makefile U databases/p5-PostgreSQL-PLPerl-Call/distinfo U databases/clickhouse/Makefile U databases/mysql57-client/Makefile U databases/mysql57-server/Makefile U databases/mysql80-client/Makefile U databases/mysql80-server/Makefile U databases/plpgsql_check/Makefile U databases/pspg/Makefile U databases/pspg/distinfo U astro/p5-Astro-SIMBAD-Client/Makefile U astro/p5-Astro-SIMBAD-Client/distinfo U astro/libosmpbf/Makefile U astro/merkaartor/Makefile U benchmarks/rubygem-benchmark-ips/Makefile U benchmarks/rubygem-benchmark-ips/distinfo U benchmarks/hyperfine/Makefile U textproc/py-parse/Makefile U textproc/py-parse/distinfo U textproc/rubygem-cld3/Makefile U textproc/bat/Makefile U textproc/ripgrep/Makefile U textproc/sd/Makefile U textproc/sonic/Makefile U textproc/xsv-rs/Makefile U www/qdecoder/Makefile U www/qdecoder/distinfo U www/qdecoder/pkg-descr A www/qdecoder/pkg-plist U www/envoy/Makefile U www/mod_pagespeed/Makefile U www/cliqz/Makefile U www/ffsend/Makefile U www/firefox/Makefile U www/firefox-esr/Makefile U www/geckodriver/Makefile U www/jwt-cli/Makefile U www/miniserve/Makefile U www/monolith/Makefile U www/newsboat/Makefile U www/websocat/Makefile U www/zola/Makefile U sysutils/tlsdate/Makefile U sysutils/rcm/Makefile U sysutils/rcm/distinfo U sysutils/rcm/pkg-descr U sysutils/moreutils/Makefile U sysutils/moreutils/distinfo U sysutils/burp-devel/Makefile U sysutils/burp-devel/distinfo A sysutils/burp-devel/files A sysutils/burp-devel/files/burp.in A sysutils/burp-devel/pkg-descr A sysutils/burp-devel/pkg-plist U sysutils/burp/Makefile U sysutils/burp/distinfo U sysutils/burp/pkg-descr U sysutils/burp/pkg-plist U sysutils/apache-mesos/Makefile U sysutils/zbackup/Makefile U sysutils/dua-cli/Makefile U sysutils/exa/Makefile U sysutils/fd/Makefile U sysutils/flowgger/Makefile U sysutils/fselect/Makefile U sysutils/fusefs-sandboxfs/Makefile U sysutils/hexyl/Makefile U sysutils/lsd/Makefile U sysutils/onefetch/Makefile U sysutils/potnet/Makefile U sysutils/rsfetch/Makefile U sysutils/tealdeer/Makefile U sysutils/vector/Makefile U sysutils/zoxide/Makefile D editors/hexedit/files U editors/hexedit/Makefile U editors/hexedit/distinfo U editors/kak-lsp/Makefile U editors/parinfer-rust/Makefile U editors/xi-core/Makefile U editors/xi-term/Makefile U audio/clementine-player/Makefile U audio/mixxx/Makefile U audio/mixxx21/Makefile U audio/mumble/Makefile U audio/murmur/Makefile U audio/strawberry/Makefile U audio/ncspot/Makefile U audio/spotify-tui/Makefile U audio/spotifyd/Makefile U cad/cura-engine/Makefile U dns/dnsdist/Makefile U dns/knot-resolver/Makefile U dns/powerdns/Makefile U dns/powerdns-recursor/Makefile U dns/doh-proxy/Makefile U games/cockatrice/Makefile U games/pink-pony/Makefile U games/pokerth/Makefile U games/quake2-lights/files/patch-lights-src-Makefile U games/quake2-psychomod/files/patch-src_Makefile U games/abstreet/Makefile U games/dose-response/Makefile U games/genact/Makefile U games/jaggedalliance2/Makefile U games/veloren/Makefile U graphics/caffe/Makefile U graphics/opencv/Makefile U graphics/osgearth/Makefile U graphics/qgis/Makefile U graphics/qtpbfimageplugin/Makefile U graphics/ikona/Makefile U graphics/librsvg2-rust/Makefile U graphics/pastel/Makefile U graphics/rx/Makefile U graphics/svgbob/Makefile U graphics/viu/Makefile U japanese/mozc-server/Makefile U mail/astroid/Makefile U mail/thunderbird/Makefile U math/or-tools/Makefile U math/py-or-tools/Makefile U misc/glow/Makefile U misc/mnn/Makefile U misc/py-onnx/Makefile U misc/broot/Makefile U misc/ruut/Makefile U multimedia/vlc/Makefile U multimedia/tvheadend/Makefile A multimedia/tvheadend/files/patch-fno-common.patch U multimedia/librav1e/Makefile U multimedia/rav1e/Makefile U multimedia/termplay/Makefile U net/eternalterminal/Makefile U net/libarcus/Makefile U net/mosh/Makefile U net/spoofer/Makefile U net/findomain/Makefile U net/proby/Makefile U net/quiche/Makefile U net/rabbiteer/Makefile U net/routinator/Makefile U net-im/ricochet/Makefile U net-im/fractal/Makefile U net-mgmt/collectd5/Makefile U net-mgmt/p5-SNMP_Session/Makefile U net-mgmt/p5-SNMP_Session/files/patch-SNMP_Session.pm U net-p2p/bitcoin/Makefile U net-p2p/litecoin/Makefile U net-p2p/namecoin/Makefile U net-p2p/qtum/Makefile U net-p2p/zetacoin/Makefile U net-p2p/openethereum/Makefile U science/paraview/Makefile U science/py-chainer/Makefile U science/py-tensorflow/Makefile U x11/admiral/Makefile U x11/alacritty/Makefile U x11/squeekboard/Makefile U archivers/par2cmdline/Makefile U Mk/Uses/cargo.mk U deskutils/just/Makefile U java/icedtea-web/Makefile U lang/rust/Makefile U lang/rust/distinfo U lang/rust/files/patch-src_bootstrap_native.rs U lang/rust-bootstrap/Makefile U lang/rust-bootstrap/distinfo U lang/spidermonkey68/Makefile U security/acmed/Makefile U security/cargo-audit/Makefile U security/cloak/Makefile U security/suricata/Makefile Updated to revision 547122. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 21:09:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8468E3CACA8 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfmDp21ksz4ZSM; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-qt1-f170.google.com (mail-qt1-f170.google.com [209.85.160.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24F3226F95; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-qt1-f170.google.com with SMTP id k18so3439388qtm.10; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:09:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZaDfCIQSp4yfhzm2L+8TjEkrrd9SiosZC/uxRji0kTiSA85S8 5NDNKHhhH3LCCXru9yPchdcLgakT+xECNCpFGc8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwE8R+da6aroE9JI4TswieN60tqloYhou11kyycfRpvPRS0OlncGddjT8LAE5cvTlLSaMxWPWp5HP702pcWLEY= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:424a:: with SMTP id r10mr5759930qtm.211.1598821785549; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:09:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9e9a7bfd-a936-9e8c-846f-cf929451910e@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <9e9a7bfd-a936-9e8c-846f-cf929451910e@FreeBSD.org> From: Kyle Evans Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:09:34 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: math/reduce: could use some help with recent current failure To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:09:46 -0000 On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hello; > > math/reduce appears broken on pkg-fallout due to the recent LLVM upgrade. > > It seems like an lld issue: > > > ld: error: duplicate symbol: MeToReduce > >>>> defined at redchild.c > >>>> rfpsl-redchild.o:(MeToReduce) > >>>> defined at reddeb.c > >>>> rfpsl-reddeb.o:(.bss+0x4) > > ld: error: duplicate symbol: ReduceToMe > > Also, I have an updated port here: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/ports/math-reduce.diff > > > I have tried both -fno-common and LLVM11 but I can't reproduce the > failure, so if someone with -current wants to try, it would be helpful. > Hi, Unfortunately I couldn't convince the update to build (for mysterious reasons, and I didn't have much time to diagnose), so I wrote (then realized it was technically backported) the patch that upstream provided in late May [0] and committed that. This works out well because that can be MFH'd, then we can circle back on the update soon-ish. Patch was committed in r547124. Thanks, Kyle Evans [0] https://sourceforge.net/p/reduce-algebra/code/5307/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 21:40:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99693CB569 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@mx.herrbischoff.com) Received: from a4-15.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com (a4-15.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com [54.240.4.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfmw73wPJz4c1x for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@mx.herrbischoff.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=upz6uqbfs7gpwvxptsow2lvxfyngeco2; d=herrbischoff.com; t=1598823621; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=MzP+67HTtuhMBUXk1qoX6aK8wcRc11HMKjVw0L/L59o=; b=X09a97juVi5T2TmTMQ4Kw3Q9yoQMl8mif6iWqt+qDEq94YoXDLBAMGM+8qY5IrOt rBw9+oIkyXZgUP/uvvq5qCGo3bvuSVu3ygYj0J2wy6rPXmg4xujClQRzsQ2Oe/SWC4W 53FfmATRutUT4lyocMx6KnYjr8dlRXxpEXdzPwZA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=shh3fegwg5fppqsuzphvschd53n6ihuv; d=amazonses.com; t=1598823621; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Feedback-ID; bh=MzP+67HTtuhMBUXk1qoX6aK8wcRc11HMKjVw0L/L59o=; b=a2TrtU1nsEyOWrsgt1SiclS+tL/t/pfpMG9Urd8CDKWjRLZMeZP2gaFIRMQEwnNp oNNSXmu8OGHHn8f3SLXqswnDMdineJUbktWGeTW56GOFKZu/vgiBDBdAfkjQtiFBy8H LSxsr2t3lYg7x4PfnyR2bd79HkJHl7PM0/jXWvfQ= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kryten.herrbischoff.com From: "Marcel Bischoff" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Silent stoppage building www/chromium Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:40:21 +0000 Message-ID: <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> References: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_1CFDC2D2-D7EA-44A6-B720-51090ECC6480_="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-SES-Outgoing: 2020.08.30-54.240.4.15 Feedback-ID: 1.eu-west-1.zfjIIpqymtcz7r33MlIUbjqFzxRqfJcYJy40G2nVmTA=:AmazonSES X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bfmw73wPJz4c1x X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=herrbischoff.com header.s=upz6uqbfs7gpwvxptsow2lvxfyngeco2 header.b=X09a97ju; dkim=pass header.d=amazonses.com header.s=shh3fegwg5fppqsuzphvschd53n6ihuv header.b=a2TrtU1n; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=herrbischoff.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@mx.herrbischoff.com designates 54.240.4.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@mx.herrbischoff.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.21 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.015]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[herrbischoff.com:s=upz6uqbfs7gpwvxptsow2lvxfyngeco2,amazonses.com:s=shh3fegwg5fppqsuzphvschd53n6ihuv]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.029]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[herrbischoff.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:54.240.0.0/18]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[herrbischoff.com:+,amazonses.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[herrbischoff.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[54.240.4.15:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.86)[-1.862]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[marcel@herrbischoff.com,0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@mx.herrbischoff.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[54.240.4.15:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:54.240.0.0/21, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[marcel@herrbischoff.com,0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@mx.herrbischoff.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:40:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 3156 and 4880). --=_MailMate_1CFDC2D2-D7EA-44A6-B720-51090ECC6480_= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Firefox has Rust as a dependency. In the past I have found that the build= process for the latter easily overwhelms lean systems with little physic= al RAM. Regardless of swap space, quite unlike most other ports. Marcel On 30 Aug 2020, at 17:49, bob prohaska wrote: > Apologies, the port in question is www/firefox, not www/chromium. > > Sorry for the write-o, > > bob > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " --=_MailMate_1CFDC2D2-D7EA-44A6-B720-51090ECC6480_= Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFMBAEBCgA2FiEEpl0B+dYsfXB3IV16DxxVyLCgOc0FAl9MHMEYHG1hcmNlbEBo ZXJyYmlzY2hvZmYuY29tAAoJEA8cVciwoDnN6FYIAIbiWQo5k/Wb4YsFGLtz92IL C2MjuIXJ+a/33xoeW1G+pVO9UG5Qnm03+D1yw2OfHmK0vqJmU8dOd7w112cApHC3 6GZ6zUyI1xsdB4NHZPhY9ZgH2TRWjpufBYm5rXcFvpZOSIzLosvgzlLXuSiOLGW8 4M/ujDP6lwe3lwX4yhynE/7M0v73fOsbLVhkGjAk7tGKzod70NwOJZtYa1gTeZSF PqgjgMshOSohlD+/daf36WSssn1jw8gBb1+9PMJBZb2Oq7BpecoSIhmzOFU0wVFG JSiNC7jOtNcAgbST9aPNIKp464pJKlAdPZPRr3rJyhpnj4JCiUU5X+uabpWGhF4= =Jla0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_MailMate_1CFDC2D2-D7EA-44A6-B720-51090ECC6480_=-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 21:52:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9798E3CC436 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfn9q4Llmz4crx for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07ULqPHS055210 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:52:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07ULqPX4055209; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:52:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:52:20 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Marcel Bischoff Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Firefox build failure, was Re: Silent stoppage building www/chromium Message-ID: <20200830215220.GA55065@www.zefox.net> References: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bfn9q4Llmz4crx X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.63 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.80)[-0.802]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.80)[-0.802]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.33)[0.332]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:52:18 -0000 On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 09:40:21PM +0000, Marcel Bischoff wrote: > Firefox has Rust as a dependency. In the past I have found that the build process for the latter easily overwhelms lean systems with little physical RAM. Regardless of swap space, quite unlike most other ports. > My error seems to have been using -j2 with make. Re-run using simply make -DBATCH MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes compilation kept going until reporting gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/toolkit/library/rust' gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' *** Error code 1 but no further details are offered. It's been suggested to obtain a backtrace, but looking at the man page that seems to require some changes to the source, which I don't know how to do. If somebody can suggest reading material I'll give it a try. Thanks for replying, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 22:03:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40CA3CC694 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from viclamta33p.bpe.bigpond.com (viclamta33p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfnR749Tlz4dPd for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.26.4]) by viclafep33p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20200830220337.OWEK10218.viclafep33p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:03:37 +1000 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudefgedgtdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesthdttddttdervdenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekieetjeeuuefhfeeguedvudeifeevudfgvedtffekhfffjeekhfdutdetheethfenucfkphepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqedprhgtphhtthhopeeofhhrvggvsghsugdqphhorhhtshesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgheq X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.420) id 5E8A564B1941642D for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:03:36 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07UM3X44093489 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:03:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 07UM3WG9093486 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:03:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:03:32 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfnR749Tlz4dPd X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dave@horsfall.org has no SPF policy when checking 203.38.21.97) smtp.mailfrom=dave@horsfall.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.88)[-0.885]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.846]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[horsfall.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.093]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[203.38.21.97:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:03:50 -0000 [ I seem to have missed the post to which this refers ] On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> Exactly. Another case in point: x11/xtset. Maintenance stopped in >> 1993, 11 days after the FreeBSD project came into existence. It works >> fine, and I find it very useful. If at some time in the future it >> should no longer work with the latest and greatest iteration of the C >> programming language or ports structure, that shouldn't be a reason to >> discard it. What does "xtset" do that the following script does not? I picked it up from $JOB a couple of decades ago. /usr/local/bin/wintit: # Change window title. # # 0 means both title and icon. # 1 means icon # 2 means title # echo -n ']0;'$*'' Watch out for the embedded ESC and ^G chars, and modify as necessary for SysVile i.e. "-n" vs. "\c". And no, printf(1) didn't exist back then, and I'm too lazy to fix it now. aneurin% cat /usr/ports/x11/xtset/pkg-descr Utility to set title on an xterm. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 22:05:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3433CC89D for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfnSq1Sq4z4dMV; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (unknown [181.52.72.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pfg) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5FEB274B1; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: math/reduce: could use some help with recent current failure To: Kyle Evans Cc: FreeBSD Ports References: <9e9a7bfd-a936-9e8c-846f-cf929451910e@FreeBSD.org> From: Pedro Giffuni Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <3fb1ffb3-a5e8-da0f-161d-e4562dba62ee@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:05:12 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:05:15 -0000 On 30/08/2020 16:09, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Hello; >> >> math/reduce appears broken on pkg-fallout due to the recent LLVM upgrade. >> >> It seems like an lld issue: >> >>> ld: error: duplicate symbol: MeToReduce >>>>>> defined at redchild.c >>>>>> rfpsl-redchild.o:(MeToReduce) >>>>>> defined at reddeb.c >>>>>> rfpsl-reddeb.o:(.bss+0x4) >>> ld: error: duplicate symbol: ReduceToMe >> Also, I have an updated port here: >> >> https://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/ports/math-reduce.diff >> >> >> I have tried both -fno-common and LLVM11 but I can't reproduce the >> failure, so if someone with -current wants to try, it would be helpful. >> > Hi, > > Unfortunately I couldn't convince the update to build (for mysterious > reasons, and I didn't have much time to diagnose), so I wrote (then > realized it was technically backported) the patch that upstream > provided in late May [0] and committed that. This works out well > because that can be MFH'd, then we can circle back on the update > soon-ish. It seems like the update triggers a bug in clang! > Patch was committed in r547124. > > Thanks, > > Kyle Evans > > [0] https://sourceforge.net/p/reduce-algebra/code/5307/ Very nice, that will do, thanks! Pedro. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 22:35:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489013CD68D for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from fedex2.jetcafe.org (fedex2.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fedex2.jetcafe.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfp8D5Fdlz4g09 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) X-Envelope-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from bigus.dream-tech.com (bigus.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.7]) by fedex2.jetcafe.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07UMZns1062300 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:35:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:35:48 -0700 From: Dave Hayes To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal Message-ID: <20200830153548.0a6ac177@bigus.dream-tech.com> In-Reply-To: References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JetCafe-SA-Rules: Using your user_prefs file X-Spam-Score: -1 ( out of 5.1) ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4-jetcafeglobal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.83 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bfp8D5Fdlz4g09 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dave@jetcafe.org designates 205.147.26.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dave@jetcafe.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.59 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.022]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[jetcafe.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.28)[-0.278]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7397, ipnet:205.147.0.0/18, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:35:58 -0000 On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:03:32 +1000 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > What does "xtset" do that the following script does not? While accurate, this point is not relevant to the discussion at hand. I believe this discussion is about some people (including myself) feeling that ports are removed too aggressively. I would like to add my small voice to the people calling for some restraint on this. Ports that continue to work, despite years of changes in other software, shouldn't be removed. Those are likely the some of the best written ports. Part of the appeal of FreeBSD is it's ability to run legacy software, and a port that does not need maintenance isn't "dead" if it never needs maintenance in the first place. -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - LA CA, USA - dave@dream-tech.com >>>> *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* <<<< Due to confusion, people mistake things for themselves; covetousness flares up, and they get into vicious cycles that cloud perceptions and enshroud them in ignorance. The vicious cycles go on and on, and people cannot be free. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 23:03:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069293CE055 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from viclamta33p.bpe.bigpond.com (viclamta33p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfpmW3tF6z3Sp5 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.26.4]) by viclafep10p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20200830225136.IMC3784.viclafep10p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:51:36 +1000 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudefgedgudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesthdttddttdervdenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffffejuedtveekueeigffffeegkedvffegveduhfeftdefgeffgeehhfelteelffenucffohhmrghinhephhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgnecukfhppeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheprghnvghurhhinhdrhhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgpdhinhgvthepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeouggrvhgvsehhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrgheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehfrhgvvggsshguqdhpohhrthhssehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgqe X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.420) id 5E865EB519C4B732 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:51:36 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07UMpYBw094055 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:51:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 07UMpXCS094052 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:51:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:51:33 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> <3ef2fdf3-c746-2f57-ec2f-2f8784bfd5ce@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfpmW3tF6z3Sp5 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dave@horsfall.org has no SPF policy when checking 203.38.21.97) smtp.mailfrom=dave@horsfall.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.922]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.899]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[horsfall.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.04)[0.039]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[203.38.21.97:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:03:57 -0000 On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Yuri wrote: > However, not many people are willing to install sysutils/bsdstats, or know > about it, so it only counts based on a tiny fraction of hosts running > FreeBSD. Tried to install it, and... aneurin# portinstall bsdstats [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 322 packages found - done] /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.4/pkgtools/pkgtools.rb:1180: warning: Insecure world writable dir /tmp/ in PATH, mode 040777 ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! sysutils/bsdstats (could not find a temporary directory) Gosh; /tmp is world-writable... Who'd've thought? aneurin# echo $PATH /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/home/dave/bin: Hmmm... I don't see /tmp in there. aneurin# uname -a FreeBSD aneurin.horsfall.org 10.4-RELEASE-p13 FreeBSD 10.4-RELEASE-p13 #0: Thu Sep 27 09:21:23 UTC 2018 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Yeah, it's old, but I'm building a new one. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 23:51:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7073CF3BD for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfqqb2Mqbz3VhR; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1598831499; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MHrHfKTzXAzVVomxZ1QJAoOjVXx6Q2Vq142s3xnBY/c=; b=BqDtz8+r3sT6h5J1QJ+EHf644b8HICH7eV0auFfV20GgtM1nvy+MALgb07MuUnUynX+LzS TSPyGK58uwswqdYteC2giWdglBi6YuSiKv65LTQjb+c4kCM1VOo4Q0r0N440wvXP12eHvI b7ocVE6jC3eMZV2RazeZn+pu/InJ3yfg1OciLTzc3Jsm/yM6PnUs3CusaYCNTdaIZq7XNi nQ8gz75CbsB4KDNECwlnTAYyRGXI2Rh6s/TAZLdHlIu4IAsM5mnQR+yFpNptnurnqPWfZZ Bu8NrCNEwRUtPDcms1RuPXabmjX8jEWae8WD/+1qFcZtj5vjC1+uFYanR13ToA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 40F5F592F; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:51:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: bob prohaska Cc: Marcel Bischoff , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox build failure, was Re: Silent stoppage building www/chromium References: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <20200830215220.GA55065@www.zefox.net> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 01:51:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200830215220.GA55065@www.zefox.net> (bob prohaska's message of "Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:52:20 -0700") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1598831499; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MHrHfKTzXAzVVomxZ1QJAoOjVXx6Q2Vq142s3xnBY/c=; b=CtJ8dpm1yhUn3kE21cmtIGSIhuvUunNv0Ms8i/XyZzBpS8mr/Z0bprpwT/9T5en5BlAiJB imWiVGSwJ8Gqaob7MZqY+Uq9UZmec8P6yp+LmNBCQ+wMdCE7wyBWXsCtayxL0nDTRu4Y9t E3+1Q5e5A35qDluI7OQUID1sLBVd84PUwwDbcaXK8lgNNsUuP7VTJFGa5sASD8z5LCPUAY w8EA5JhqhBS4vHuUWw8a3OtdhpYsVeLMw3pBJRQb9qTFOLEIgnzZMjGSNtpQ75uWrE1vQt 3Qf3a5HxCxPL3YNILPunzrDOpQNIY3UOtIflKtu7SeAICgNX4ThdKcVeDEwLfg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1598831499; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yXfVI/+8VNm2AtubM0nvc2n1mvHC/RK93fMktS/pklJKuXQT6gbdfZEj7d5ExZn8iz6Vxu RimIAHou1dKEvPlvkuj2flH1mvraCIEyXRQSXeX9VF32mQGSaG8hZffUCefhJMKcwe7dmg J7nUfhF4JkhmbyyzBM+M1EcpulnFTZX/V7/RoACi06xWYI4HmipEHUwsKtk1gKzQj0RZZx lbCV5yXz8IGkyILBa9zmC2WvtpMMxygpITCEUnwhBqQgFs+0p/5PGurlahDf3c3040N0kG iDLw0dpe6XGbNBftJnEclIAU/PgFHnVcUah0C70iw8SJf4gWTA92mHogMhbBVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:51:39 -0000 bob prohaska writes: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 09:40:21PM +0000, Marcel Bischoff wrote: > >> Firefox has Rust as a dependency. In the past I have found that the >> build process for the latter easily overwhelms lean systems with >> little physical RAM. Regardless of swap space, quite unlike most >> other ports. >> > > My error seems to have been using -j2 with make. Re-run using simply > make -DBATCH MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes > compilation kept going until reporting > gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/toolkit/library/rust' > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' > gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' > *** Error code 1 The actual error appears to have been elided. Paste full output when restarting build (as text/plain) or upload poudriere log. www/firefox used to build fine on aarch64, see http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/firefox/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 00:06:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9CA3CFDCE for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bfr8Q2smtz3WlV for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6276C3CFB4D; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623FB3CFE85 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfr8Q1xdJz3Wnp for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CFEF1EF64 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07V06D4U081213 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:13 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07V06DrI081211 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:13 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:13 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <202008310006.07V06DrI081211@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:06:14 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 00:22:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0C03D0590 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from lax.lemis.com (www.lemis.com [45.32.70.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfrVh6Yrdz3XbL for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from eureka.lemis.com (aussie-gw.lemis.com [167.179.139.35]) by lax.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE322809E; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eureka.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id EF25526359A; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:21:57 +1000 (AEST) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:21:57 +1000 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: xtset raison d'etre (was: Aggressive ports removal) Message-ID: <20200831002157.GB28873@eureka.lemis.com> References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-3-5309-0418 Mobile: +61-490-494-038. Use only as instructed. WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfrVh6Yrdz3XbL X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grog@lemis.com has no SPF policy when checking 45.32.70.18) smtp.mailfrom=grog@lemis.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.32 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.931]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[grog]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.007]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.58)[-0.584]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:45.32.64.0/19, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:22:06 -0000 --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 8:03:32 +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: > [ I seem to have missed the post to which this refers ] Sorry, I nearly missed this one because you didn't change the Subject: line. > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, Niclas Zeising wrote: >>> Exactly. Another case in point: x11/xtset. Maintenance stopped in >>> 1993, 11 days after the FreeBSD project came into existence. It works Well, no, he quoted: On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 9:27:07 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > Exactly. Another case in point: x11/xtset. Maintenance stopped in > ... > What does "xtset" do that the following script does not? I picked it up > from $JOB a couple of decades ago. > > /usr/local/bin/wintit: > ... It inserts text in the same control sequence, but formats them based on format =E2=80=9Cmetavariables". From the man page (which I'll send you separately): xtset -t %u (%T) %h:%D might set the title text to root (ttyp0) myhost:usr/src Clearly it's not rocket science, which is why it has worked well until some wise person decided that predicates are no longer acceptable in C (see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249017). It still works well. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAl9MQqUACgkQIubykFB6QiPPUwCfesikOGwZcYtA1qWPfmGEfnmg kRwAn0z0RuCOX93dDrdBkegPZMR1RfNm =IHVF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 07:22:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0113B82F6 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liedtke@punkt.de) Received: from mail.punkt.de (mail.punkt.de [217.29.41.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bg1ql5Ry5z49CY for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liedtke@punkt.de) Received: from [217.29.46.73] (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAC1718165 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:22:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Silent stoppage building www/chromium To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> From: Lars Liedtke Autocrypt: addr=liedtke@punkt.de; keydata= mQINBFqZsngBEAC2qgHHKyTYnOxr/giErojNdDHd4x+8snzW0F6cInzagVySiM6+htoBmUsX uIUCrbsdS4jkADo9fIs0DHfmNWs1Fgp5BWlgNIYV3+P6K756YMFlr/Q2p3ddsJ/YZ5rnkWE5 bNMOQgY9Hdl0kPB1leWy0gRyVjbwU0mv6JimA+Y4e43TG8qKGd4n26h6dUirDjjrc4esMUjz cPMobbcStYR79D2llJWdSVeYgg40E5MeExATTC7sNL9RJPcEOKHCYI1Kn85nvJw98iFyMYlh lcSKqUJhpJ20D7U0DOFJKzY/Ox0+nmmcUchspvSGgAeuBV+fvSJYH1yQnCzz+T2uBcO8JVPO aNKuZ25ruN4ILN5b3dhCTS/aR/A35QyGb9N2SR9Hb0o1L7FEu33JDT+kUeH+4sOSbuNFtadF GyfS+eCfpQvw4/Xua4nGwKkKe35ht3eeuQvzFaxNac1lvMIaHRcq93Sh3k9emVCYP7s4MhA1 OR0THAM5VHgfYIg17m1gvKnqFtgA0AmCDBn8PhYFEEUZWQ5dKQCcfylv8RTrv5qK5iiHBNjJ Mo83ZRb/o+OPzq3Rzt7VM0zZL0jdIGJ2Gn3mD2IybHv+TfcdGtF7RE0/TVacv1TdCn8F2L8q nVkTP22rdyqicydS2qUGxFTfoRAaO29fWGrW77HFyycROP4TbQARAQABtB9MYXJzIExpZWR0 a2UgPGxpZWR0a2VAcHVua3QuZGU+iQI9BBMBCAAnBQJambJ4AhsjBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUI CQoLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEN1tdE7BYoBiVX8QALOtAPS1Nf9qOkn4Mox7CfM7QYcu4XTg SSpYrfr3p27k09NG8M3a+70PShZeK57J4occkHPu7oRAFgOcLSZkZ1bN0Ir4D/6+bh2fMh0F lYNgzYmdukn/7IUlD+NkgPafny1MOFOD3RREKVbVrvnMID0gx4tzEJZq7B2VbhJ7Njdh3PFj IzigzJEH9fHKDv2Taz6Q/qN5TwJffTF+awGdueIPEzBS/V0P83g0M+5tfRAsI4nV+Jxwi6gb rp24rTe9cuctFJpRswzrmR+kCHvhzhC6XGZJBvpGTuQQoMunAKV5edlpAsuD2RV1YBEHGZKr rOP2weoZZdvJiU5QP+Re714p5atgg1ANuWEF3X1gU1op37zy3XH/1/Fi6MYiOovai5e/SqjP 7R2hoHBxoA9kHhEe8V5MaVcKE8cxRPzckRoBf11asyBy4QON4QTW4B9bxVeSkTaYZXp14OlF rK00yoOUJa6t3NKET68wDCvpwjNiDc4Sw5Uz1QHsMpcPVfC1nbVILO12bwlGd39qmDWi5wH3 NVgsJ3E09SobCqdrx1F6/pzHbq2I5uTa5kD9AUeIOkURwPK0ipWHvggxZlFf3b33zXwlFRYh JOYJN9zSMA1tvufpzh0ASvHrwjJWTALSUaoX9AHrw/R0PhsKuxX1XG5hsQkCUfKRrQzaJC3v 2jJkuQINBFqZsngBEAC4XuIGjNznjGatJX6HeJKtRXibysYTyvLM3Uql9I22dPLOLvATgpo2 msxRWVmPgfQGyxiurDm0LZVxtC1OLNG/BtKOSXyAZ36N0uin8aF0dB6vwYUNj2tkFfho6WQY kzhcxP3YX65UrbkU7I3ACTHUskQEGGX4M7rBPml89zBeFatEMEh0eLfzzzwecYFSiJM5nxGf SDMAqtkLe0H1aWsc0KuIPP5Y1wUaRWqDMk5qEoj02sY/sL6kMACJKxruDtZq61GAWVq6XpmV 8LyDXCXJgDh+mXuXLFTONt9HbJqMZ4iJjkHFaFoBcXkEAQEN5ZaQbKdFXpPRfu0YacHWfDRi huXr/PAPLrF01dKpu74Qih8QC6xmctbMhAPFq90jUoP2xUJ7/nYj4D8k6tA84ZPjReGmYzWQ mr8HPbUuWbLMsEpCFb+EeHPLGc6ItPw1sRCI6utzxLdpB3HONimjDjLfmvPS/mm5sClu76RM WVxw5uy6dmHiAJpycMUgnyOcAjLrQVlenObpAe5EVQmcazpWkpmuhnEl1bZQpaBftkzs5kKP 30s8dLlraBYyzxYytjUW+47pOWdYYvlF4yjp5cNyegXUQGnKgJH0p+UoMBAFplY3eNxP3mlA KT8oVY9w23+m8ZOsOPAlH1bhOvcsb9lkh1KOIUuUQxkk0NSOs5IpxQARAQABiQIlBBgBCAAP BQJambJ4AhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEN1tdE7BYoBiZHQP/3q9o8ENdGo4K7daesUmiBuedP05uLDa TXxck+7K1IsX6GpTnUMyiYm7cu/IyrhlkZBe9TaLPaOo0HEN1W7jr8PLxKtbOwQ0dIHOIi60 4DrkqvFQKH1fARaq7YJJS7DRUin5n4/hcIpoSn273kEqby8BZpsL+kB8gtIbTtVpSwJfhobh dxHBi+NlMas7KYZ8aTuNOKJTS27PjQMfeEzf8u6Hb4JSsNYuQoyoSTyBkKksx3UbjXUvESKY I3uyTF7mVXJ0hvhX4QK3XOqwTfkT8NMzc/Xkdm9iaWrap74v9vfG1Vn8KhCRSQkyjbuDuocF PEtcIEJjU1WJmIdK60X03BJUYlH3CRthJOateCZWDTOSzBIZV+JV3cnV2kx9j9+nmnTQ1yQe bpnL7OtxSONH9t+gWHuGaIX5k/Bf2Ea7cSHLm8cvza25aIQRxfqmkBrR48U1lUSZTLULxzO3 OeJacjXWGewZzJl7ecobpgs4MM7yollhKzr+1sq2SMNcVL3s+8WfeZeCorm6GJLUiABHLlr/ ISWVpM730Jc0V9PyPFAsMPQRa24FsZl8goHvp/5khoM4cvNtplh64ny83ieRjCUnQgSdhkW9 fdYhqFgfJNCacLCGxZdGrEs3F5UAtUS2nplIbODUtYQcy3Qdd+rblY8A9UTPAUCxXVLi9K6i Gk7o Organization: punkt.de GmbH Message-ID: <75d49af1-1c87-23b1-708c-00c3a6ff19cd@punkt.de> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:22:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EPbaAZrxJYjrHiOYmeGCTJcKbzQKZdNF6" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bg1ql5Ry5z49CY X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of liedtke@punkt.de designates 217.29.41.227 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=liedtke@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.95 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.29.32.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.44)[0.443]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:22:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --EPbaAZrxJYjrHiOYmeGCTJcKbzQKZdNF6 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="tje9MWJ0nhSUUjUlAusNRU49rVXqLWTWL" --tje9MWJ0nhSUUjUlAusNRU49rVXqLWTWL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: de-DE We have been seing this behaviour of poudriere with other Ports as well (tomcat, jni). If it runs out of memory, e.g. swap limits of the jail we're running poudriere in are too small, then it just fails silently. We have been able to prevent this by increasing the limits, to twice the memory limit, but of course I am well aware that not everyone is able to do that. Am 30.08.20 um 23:40 schrieb Marcel Bischoff: > Firefox has Rust as a dependency. In the past I have found that the bui= ld process for the latter easily overwhelms lean systems with little phys= ical RAM. Regardless of swap space, quite unlike most other ports. > > Marcel > > On 30 Aug 2020, at 17:49, bob prohaska wrote: > >> Apologies, the port in question is www/firefox, not www/chromium. >> >> Sorry for the write-o, >> >> bob >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" --=20 --- punkt.de GmbH Lars Liedtke =2Einfrastructure Kaiserallee 13a=09 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109 500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de info@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian St= ein --tje9MWJ0nhSUUjUlAusNRU49rVXqLWTWL-- --EPbaAZrxJYjrHiOYmeGCTJcKbzQKZdNF6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEh0MJwNfa5yPlb1D23W10TsFigGIFAl9MpSsACgkQ3W10TsFi gGLVoxAAkHhap6sRob7Br6kmZJBHeQxRJFyuEC0cxU+mSSESgctO983Y0sk31270 XDJgsY8+PoeS29DRA7MEOgSGwwOrs/JcfazYYTWVt+eBH2VisSyVbSfC0w6oLcnK geRexgkaEUFU1g/aSmy33KMcUR/VHql8S6vem+s3J4W0iPv0SiK0eHJUmvGAiP69 0M4Gcxq93lKPiCtrm45w3Qoj1yZ9VLFnhHuMJ9YuH0cWEnX6u3G28MrWq1ASjJLj mjk4i6h4d7puDLtFeFXgzzo2SmuUjLkvyhi/hONtGIGbFj/O+Av1GEe8E5VQ6Y4n eK7Ot1FadBlg8C4HyEj2R67n3kBSS/WKf5TsUhWObbRQFQ9UH0JTgIemSBci6R/5 BcBe2xJH4VKmXVnjg04OkCTAdpcixcengcm+GSDE6+fLMyn5ccFeho/Cx904P5kY E8xUGCrklHZ17PYtDC+xfBth4YjaUAy0aa3mQqqbfLmA9Yje7PIscvT81AZBfypS umS+mZkKgaYbm2M+9qmttzLcPJkD9eAvpFT2foMvIpthYWtnO4hd1GlHYAMxlGS4 7k8HWwTheafj7KjGuLjTh/MofdYRXKwKUgZvNC+2v8yZ6uQE3PcJbxIak3ppc/9Q GRLTqFWBxOBqtFzl8lSj71nqdf+Ll4kWtEuNmqebaeWVQZQVz+M= =vT3E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EPbaAZrxJYjrHiOYmeGCTJcKbzQKZdNF6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 08:01:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8C23B9397 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bg2hm1s67z4CxX for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3FA043B951E; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5C33B951D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bg2hm0z5mz4CjQ for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D8024D0D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07V81Rkh080945 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07V81RT3080944; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202008310801.07V81RT3080944@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:27 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:01:28 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/cloudcompare | 2.10.3 | v2.11.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/openpgm | 5-2-122 | release-5-3-128 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 14:25:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D03F3C2BDE for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BgCD22092z4ZHT for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 444713C2F0B; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440BF3C2EF1 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgCD20vb2z4Z6P; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [148.251.9.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: lev/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C744F2E99A; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.23.230] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91FC618486; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:25:35 +0300 (MSK) Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Aggressive ports removal To: Niclas Zeising , Greg 'groggy' Lehey Cc: FreeBSD Developers , ports@freebsd.org References: <202008291154.07TBsr7L086597@repo.freebsd.org> <9a4583d9-097e-d0ba-4959-5c4d7b96b611@freebsd.org> <20200829232707.GC46173@eureka.lemis.com> From: Lev Serebryakov Autocrypt: addr=lev@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFKbGksBEADeguVs+XyJc3mL3iiOBqDd16wSk97YTJYOi4VsHsINzJr09oFvNDiaDBIi fLn2p8XcJvehcsF2GSgrfXfw+uK4O1jyNIKJmiYA0EtE+ZbRtvDrrE0w6Q8+SDeKA21SWh3Y vSQ0DJUontbgW55ER2CbEiIUTIn34uQ0kmESAaw/v5p/9ue8yPTmURvv130FqPFz8VPzltqL NxyGt54TxPfKAzAHEIwxlEZ63JOwzloKh1UDBExcsf9nJO08/TAVgR5UZ5njFBPzaaquhRoP qPJLEQQDqxPIlvMNtHKf7iIebE4BHeqgCdJA0BoiR6gpa0wlsZtdrTPK3n4wYSphLvGbhfOZ YW/hbcu7HYS/FImkVxB3iY17kcC1UTnx4ZaYeASPBGOOPbXky1lLfmDGWIFT//70yx+G17qD OZzF1SvJJhGvh6ilFYaWMX7T+nIp6Mcafc4D7AakXM+XdubNXOMlCJhzPcZ0skgAEnYV587w V7em5fDVwQccwvtfezzqKeJAU5TGiywBHSR5Svzk2FwRNf6M//hWkpq0SRR63iOhkHGOAEBi 69GfEIwH2/w24rLxP0E+Hqq8n+EWNkPatw1Mhcl5PKkdvGCjJUaGNMkpBffjyYo254JXRscR eEnwdIkJt4ErDvjb2/UrOFq31wWMOiLzJeVchAgvTHBMRfP9aQARAQABzShMZXYgU2VyZWJy eWFrb3YgPGxldkBzZXJlYnJ5YWtvdi5zcGIucnU+wsGwBBMBCABDAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgC CQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4ACGQEWIQT5bRygtfQxi2dLMwrqsDxYv9xHjwUCW/03kQUJDwW3xgAh CRDqsDxYv9xHjxYhBPltHKC19DGLZ0szCuqwPFi/3EePHxkP+wWNrAyks2fQctY/Gl7TMh+Y Q9uX0hAuZ2Vvi0LswBl/R85SsS7IvI9b3ogOWA8CAlHAxkvgH6sWrwRTNcCPS1MzulYxS914 0CSkdwwbv1JyDOOWYU6s8PfT9+BZr+9eNXStmEdEL5XcA1k2YncQtlR3m+oLkqlAOtteZWti pitMIX9BGYIVKyl0t0RnIx+m/QPVGU9gu02j0I3NSRnKQPyFxZqYK0nPBu+FKaEhIAqdKPOv GL4/ijansdiWO3mXy18G0Mkr8yYRSidpGgXGY6lmGzQ3R6ZS30bLI8DkskOOvfErwhZv5dH5 w4+JH5sQ7bIL5HEXs//ZU9UzMdQwcURMjcFfKGyfL0hSLRqzP8m7SL1k9ZL161OQ6C5zVO/M bSCmeeLkbfOj1NW1ZIv6UjVVWE/LS4+gqg/04C+Y24vj+7vMpBVEevdwmIEdmVciFudklcnN omuocb29GKbquRZRDGiE+mhqkwmp5e59AnePp3+AvkewSCsXlR1sfjEP/Tn5OsYerJ7eAAOj DjxO374TAqJG5ftW4BA/nVmx9FGKV1/A9Yc1UuH6LdQfLf7pmTck1Cxg4kdH+3qKGD63sAR0 Wh27XDjnBKXJUN7J+nctWMZJMvw4OhTXdTyVhWt6USKEzw8M5plY4sFqxBEAe8igQXlq1Xjd ISV7wYhT4l3FzsFNBFKbGksBEAC0a9wfjo2P3JyT7Lc+QlbFVshGbSbazb4ma7QYG5IZZD5v fLBFkePoG6cnrn3WCXp4A43hszAynCwe4eXyAkv4+gPF3ZSeNE5Wz3zYG+jh2nm2iGCkyaVy kfbA+2chor2DKH5tHpuNMBlF+wSJHZKJmlo/sFIktAnV1NBVg4/cL+9/hIpvl82cl3hYCD7/ e7/qRE+w38CpAAzn65FvbODn7xlY3fsJt+cHPBJ4EBM9KnTwcce+F+72RQMZQEl7vIAwSRmL dgZHN0MFC533l62SVoKjT0eaOOIBrvesmojhWjfwugibXr+WRF/tGcW77Bxwe2eQLbEVESqW eMORxRxocx7Q7aACoHmf4G4U1Vzx7zUEfNfHjfjZeQVfAURf/MoUelZSW/BmMIfKCg3lRlWA t+Pq2h2UADPVqAZze45beE/c8z8LZsOZiGoRhYL8NSg6+ziLTdmYLWdtFGAuZhqOtNp5h6tG j21OksBotcaIa5YjbCmmnImIjGlSBkUKvIhq/RXth5b2gNwaQdu+Yv4AlZVHRsuVywL/skDF L5+We11bDK6MQ5PzvmntRJcgbyoisn1hiV04OV1LpJJMkJn1j8VlBqDQNT/z+BjB0ru/0anv +5uLj7v0ck06rEo4yiXT/ZAcBM76j7V7FaGbkoba6bUUCQ2H5YYBOKpikjCnpwARAQABwsGT BBgBCAAmAhsMFiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAlv9N7IFCQ8Ft+cAIQkQ6rA8WL/c R48WIQT5bRygtfQxi2dLMwrqsDxYv9xHj3CnD/9btCtkcphRYRUe08tUyVwzV/syDCdiUhF7 8jqDKTC+3zuyrFJi7t4fF9follHYz1Ri5RixxJHnuDFcq7ZTOprPYqO8QhckLAJOy5dmORDX 2guEA+y5zDYBwwjpio9dtnuE7QyHyMx4nMPq8O/HfO+6dDEZChkrGvcG9FTI7s0JhsDs3xxw jcROZ2OP0lNu2571ZpR4YuzMUOIhOaQBIF2wrTvLjKUsAnNQYK9gsFTeDHRsE4HZLxJvEdiZ CWN7COi9un4xtP4Khc3Fmn6ANEyh0bIgx1Eii2RGINuA2XRVYhPRJLUZRSVQcrND9k9S+m+T oaqz9JgFLusFA1KhdeYnE1bojpq1U1bsmEicLW2QfEGVumKTgUrTsno0cVPH73KDILFvHA0D 8t4UaQveRTRUVdHZ02IBVt655Q8Xq1TkHJ7l+2Ckso5IBujWD74QpSRzzffn/ihhEExwYSTj FSs0C/OgU+EDZbcq2SWu4n1OGsW337/80HnJKVWBPAZYy4EmiyQSY05MG/fj9RA9Qi4TjFLD LrIf6dFAmiiIwWjlAKiyyUk+XDJXrc1L2VhcHqfdBY4I/qwV1YAI1QI4W/i6TstB1j0GwKa3 ZORwu4eahL5+9R6xBedhXZpCL0dyKuI8iPaC8npaOCJoL8+l4+KXR/PKt8b8kzIcvSpyCZii PQ== Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:25:28 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XKGBaeSHJygJcraFqtFAg4k3MxXFk4tBs" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:25:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XKGBaeSHJygJcraFqtFAg4k3MxXFk4tBs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="aV4iVmHneUOgjEKWdjv6YrUc7KKlpLo70" --aV4iVmHneUOgjEKWdjv6YrUc7KKlpLo70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30.08.2020 11:28, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> Exactly.=C2=A0 Another case in point: x11/xtset.=C2=A0 Maintenance sto= pped in >> 1993, 11 days after the FreeBSD project came into existence.=C2=A0 It = works >> fine, and I find it very useful.=C2=A0 If at some time in the future i= t >> should no longer work with the latest and greatest iteration of the C >> programming language or ports structure, that shouldn't be a reason to= >> discard it. >=20 > Then it is very easy.=C2=A0 If it is useful to you, adopt it as maintai= ner, then you will get a notification if it fails to build, and you can f= ix the issue(s) It is not "very easy". What if port which is like `x11/xtset` is used by 100 users and 0 develo= pers/committers? What should these 100 users (not programmers by any means) do when next = `pkg upgrade` will try to delete this package? `-fcommon/-fno-common` and nay other infrastructure/compiler changes ARE= NOT user-visible problems, and MUST NOT be transferred to users. Unpatched security vulnerabilities ARE user-visible problems. Our develo= pers' dances around C/C++ standards and other hacker toys ARE NOT. --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --aV4iVmHneUOgjEKWdjv6YrUc7KKlpLo70-- --XKGBaeSHJygJcraFqtFAg4k3MxXFk4tBs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE+W0coLX0MYtnSzMK6rA8WL/cR48FAl9NCF5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEY5 NkQxQ0EwQjVGNDMxOEI2NzRCMzMwQUVBQjAzQzU4QkZEQzQ3OEYACgkQ6rA8WL/c R48eyg/9FX3HCMKHNbDN2qIOrkRKYnaJFKz7Ilbh39iGmHEyVTCWa2wm+7S7ma+8 dIIhkw9GZu8d8B6633L/j1kQLZbtp5clvT1Ct+goV6STdI47quSWEdKO9msy8HzR 6ryGZzx4/PqHOkZQh8UBrKPFX3OYazYppXki9jrKT9NIGDa38Q4YyI4zP3YEyIAT cBF1S14haTGvOPP0TE2Ie3srlwgb7Fc0RaIx5JOcnNZ0ySZ+nOstKvHCdX5tyeLg r4JNlzny3yQEnS+wMQSBNdbGg1ALfA/d4UDmCI5096YNvJNbomfKoVERuAE/VD1R efoyxj2b+36Y0KSe1eBnj5mM9MP+xqtosfR+VrejVqRQlWRRi+hl8Ob1nC5eXWFj daH6RUbwROlrZU1OcohEtRLAy571aCBM3gRGBgxLu+umfN8InXE7R4RVuZpdXuyw 19b0MO9WuGdtKp370MDBEU1t6UE+3GTyhyjwryzRz7W0brprqbo78YpcwG74o0p9 4Q3DSWGOjxQJFN0yv2SICdYxrP7xHFPAMEh3I4t7lRsN0vGDSPQIjEp6RvCgOsct EEDuG3iwG9ZPvCSMVtRU/1AbMLf1qZhZZbRxVg92Ctkk6tup470op+ZwNveqCv4a WrN9MylClaLYOfjvzv2XhJ2ojN9No/twKMeCqfOdk+EBsPDlC8E= =8+H/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XKGBaeSHJygJcraFqtFAg4k3MxXFk4tBs-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 14:27:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F043C2D4F for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgCFs6tS6z4ZTc for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:27:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07VER2n9087205 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:27:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu To: timp87@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Squid 4.13 (security update) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:27:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgCFs6tS6z4ZTc X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.79 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:27:15 -0000 Hello. I see Squid 4.13 was released 8 days ago: it's "strongly suggested" everyone updates, as it fixes "serious" security issues. I don't see it coming in the port tree and neither in the pkg audit vulnerability database. If you already knew, please disregard and forgive. bye av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 14:30:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA563C3123 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgCLB05Psz4ZWD for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:30:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kCkpa-000CqF-7E; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:30:46 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:30:46 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: timp87@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Squid 4.13 (security update) Message-ID: <20200831143046.GW3539@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgCLB05Psz4ZWD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:30:58 -0000 Hi! > I see Squid 4.13 was released 8 days ago: it's "strongly suggested" > everyone updates, as it fixes "serious" security issues. > > I don't see it coming in the port tree and neither in the pkg audit > vulnerability database. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248856 has a patch from the maintainer. @work -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 15:19:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89213C426B for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgDQh0Ryvz4dYh; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c1c24b92; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:13:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=2ewHZM4F8uqI0E rZOdb2QeDmgDM=; b=c1TQrkAZUY02Z4e8A7frlQ9EUfeCToKBCzEDs55ot/Pyv+ Bch1Wt/U2gOwItva+Pgq/ayNOOPsRj8nBpsRfrQ/8xSYCTB/2tDnX9f+5bQXuv4+ CKZe5xme0yHXevaM7W8ca0+eq0PwlLJAPryRXHYSL/GUzUA5zw92qnsTFIDrW3wU sPZHVo6bk464LAZ8SK3Jr+PE1M7TIZrjsryRaGomkqH3i8p/mcGI9IN/kltg4Ew5 kAy6ssnDJAWlVcmfXXpE8Wqn8gt2F1wIq2xFBNQAezW75gm9Ci/0YxwkqjTGUpSs GO3wTAK1V6utRNpfegbyr0Bc5PL0t4xedw9niIXA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=hEqigp3A HTcXrDbvtJ8458uU6cTAtdKonU7WfsmZmhbNdZL+FiDiVZ6h9z1yOFrxIiTGfZgW XLub7s37MqnKKQhoFRRQ6MEaiRCjNs0vcZM8pgmJ0laZka2fulUFACL3OpoVvSm2 YXg43Klz8SLWuQWRMYl0gdN4dmX7ualaM9x9ZcyDvD54yOUfPaA8H7oOuh9UHzZI dc3S++zYLY5YpnuXdL9n1ornWyMqh7P+cAPc3BS+eZLCcBsTSU7Mte/qsgBbxLof XozvRewS6FGESpMmnPwi1HXZgYCxDefXEnyqlVecOfXjPPncJrIHFN4+A0TXHPmb dZ/u3q1WOxX7LA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id eabb56ee (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Squid 4.13 (security update) From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <20200831143046.GW3539@home.opsec.eu> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:13:13 +0200 Cc: Andrea Venturoli , timp87@gmail.com, FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <47053238-64B8-4404-B2C1-E758A23665EC@grem.de> References: <20200831143046.GW3539@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17G80) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgDQh0Ryvz4dYh X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=c1TQrkAZ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.013]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.76)[-0.760]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.03)[-1.028]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[netfence.it,gmail.com,freebsd.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[FreeBSD-ports] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:19:57 -0000 > On 31. Aug 2020, at 16:31, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHi! >=20 >> I see Squid 4.13 was released 8 days ago: it's "strongly suggested" >> everyone updates, as it fixes "serious" security issues. >>=20 >> I don't see it coming in the port tree and neither in the pkg audit >> vulnerability database. >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248856 >=20 > has a patch from the maintainer. @work >=20 CVEs should be: CVE-2020-15810 and CVE-2020-15811 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2020-15810 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2020-15811 > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 15:35:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B643C4C8B for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:35:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgDn35D2Hz4fv1; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07VFa0PU058153 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 07VFa0qY058152; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:35:59 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Jan Beich Cc: Marcel Bischoff , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox build failure, was Re: Silent stoppage building www/chromium Message-ID: <20200831153559.GA58133@www.zefox.net> References: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <20200830215220.GA55065@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgDn35D2Hz4fv1 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.36 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.838]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.53)[-0.525]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.900]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:35:52 -0000 On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:51:35AM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > > The actual error appears to have been elided. Paste full output when > restarting build (as text/plain) or upload poudriere log. > > www/firefox used to build fine on aarch64, see > http://thunderx1.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/firefox/ Indeed, it even built on the Pi3 some months ago. The log I have is at http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/firefox/ in case it contains some overlooked details. In the meantime a clean restart is going, it looks like firefox got bumped to version 80. Perhaps that'll make a difference. To conserve resources I'm using a plain vanilla make. If use of a ports management system is mandatory please warn me. Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 17:16:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729B73C7623 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgH0c58XNz3YRl; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07VHFsrt018414 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:15:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Squid 4.13 (security update) To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: timp87@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20200831143046.GW3539@home.opsec.eu> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <04afcd2b-39a4-ac08-b53f-b8d8ed17a47c@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:15:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200831143046.GW3539@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgH0c58XNz3YRl X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.18 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.995]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.34)[-0.339]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.04)[-1.043]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:16:02 -0000 On 2020-08-31 16:30, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I see Squid 4.13 was released 8 days ago: it's "strongly suggested" >> everyone updates, as it fixes "serious" security issues. >> >> I don't see it coming in the port tree and neither in the pkg audit >> vulnerability database. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248856 > > has a patch from the maintainer. @work > I see it committed now. Thanks to anyone who spent time on this. bye av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 31 18:40:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A175A3CA287 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgJsx2Kpcz3f4q; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kCoek-0005RG-Ml; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:35:50 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:35:50 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Wolfram Schneider Cc: Kurt Jaeger , Michael Gmelin , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200831183550.GB1249@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> <20200826180911.6c3303ff@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826163751.GO1265@fc.opsec.eu> <20200826184711.512a3b9c@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826165046.GP1265@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgJsx2Kpcz3f4q X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:40:21 -0000 Hi! > > > > man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only missing > > > > some job to regulary extract the latest > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/13.0-CURRENT/ports.txz > > > > for the current tree of the manuals. > > > How does it actually create the pages though? > > wosch probably knows this. > > Indeed ;-) > > The ports manual pages will be updated once when a new release comes > out. Maybe every 3-9 months. The update takes hours and a lot of > resources (60GB download of all packages and unpacking). Is there a script or a README how this is done ? Would it work to do this for each snapshot, if someone automates it ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 08:53:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E973BE374 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:300:2185:123::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bggns59jpz4CMW for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [104.207.135.49]) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 0818r5vA090387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:53:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id 0818r5jU090386 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:53:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <202009010853.0818r5jU090386@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:53:05 +0100 Organization: Dyslexic Fish To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [104.207.135.49]); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:53:05 +0100 (BST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bggns59jpz4CMW X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=catflap.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jamie@catflap.org designates 2001:19f0:300:2185:123::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jamie@catflap.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.68 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.008]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jamie]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:dyslexicfish.net:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.05)[-1.046]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[catflap.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.828]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0::/38, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:53:06 -0000 There are updates to 2 ports that are not being actioned - one of the ports has since been marked for deletion as it no longer works, and the fix is almost 2 years old! (I updated the fix a few months ago) How do I go about getting these actioned? emulators/rtc https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233057 net-p2p/gtk-gnutella https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247914 Cheers, Jamie From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 09:16:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C673BF53C for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:300:2185:123::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BghJq0gMMz4DbT for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [104.207.135.49]) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 0819GQgE099366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:16:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id 0819GQKK099365 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:16:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <202009010916.0819GQKK099365@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 10:16:26 +0100 Organization: Dyslexic Fish To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [104.207.135.49]); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 10:16:26 +0100 (BST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BghJq0gMMz4DbT X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=catflap.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jamie@catflap.org designates 2001:19f0:300:2185:123::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jamie@catflap.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.61 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jamie]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:dyslexicfish.net:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.044]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[catflap.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.76)[-0.762]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.005]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0::/38, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:16:27 -0000 P.S. Apologies for using the word "ignored" - it's an emotive word, and that wasn't the intent - I didn't mean it in a critical way. Cheers, Jamie From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 09:23:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47543BFAFA for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BghSn2Y6Nz4F6r for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kD2VX-000LZm-5L; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:23:15 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:23:15 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Jamie Landeg-Jones Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored Message-ID: <20200901092315.GE53210@home.opsec.eu> References: <202009010916.0819GQKK099365@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202009010916.0819GQKK099365@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BghSn2Y6Nz4F6r X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:23:21 -0000 Hi! > P.S. Apologies for using the word "ignored" - it's an emotive word, and > that wasn't the intent - I didn't mean it in a critical way. Well, the correct word would be 'drowned' 8-} Those PRs drowned in the flood of PRs -- and the committers drowned with them 8-} At least the rtc one is committed, the other is testbuilding right now. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 09:36:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFFE3C0450 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:36:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean.greven@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BghlK6g6Xz4FRD for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean.greven@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id nw23so696474ejb.4 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 02:35:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WU1Re7AFp3Jyuhqyi+ReY2OyRzXIZEOgmYbAWiFWxBE=; b=XzhFx7E3ydI83xPC9V6EI+khyTcLZTtpWjZUA+fWyNlP7Yhe/KPm7mexwL9CbORw3H iGdQseo4cUeAp373fyAnstaUvebnpVc1gSmDpbJ1QMSH1wYvlj/wnbvd4VzqLUaNHqed g1t0LenHXuQKoU4JlPbFdRxbxF5btncfZytuhhBockOKjxf/f8qsruSf5LNXcBDG9i08 mgOS/te2gTXzDXRuV+0gL+LiWszl8hr11p/2YZD2JTpEzwgCiXHogUUtRCZRkW/E/Efs B0p58AImj8J2HOcyEPVgo5tIYbjSuUolFHkLDFmHbnOHauKukRLgGzOIH9ulGMAR+ZHe A6XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WU1Re7AFp3Jyuhqyi+ReY2OyRzXIZEOgmYbAWiFWxBE=; b=r6bnFiI69kErlYCooldGtbstTo+0uSjS9TTA5yjK6dsyorrgRyDSIzqflR3WBrWzse smjrr0ATmKTAP6M40oBuVWQyd0DmAwkMf+YTfd4Pe4OiSRlzmjkP0+Z/OV5dD01IRtoc s2t3sx+IQVE2CuyoJXf92artFRyJR1h6gOx8W/MHRN1bs2jU3ZH4HARWstpfukigvAX7 y0/FszAJA9fOa+PEG+BrhN4CVlxAfe5KTC0+kWW899tJZUNHOQak6iqlJ9zLrejo6rs/ ZsJjn9puPJEgQh5CMszHd5cPCZ3uVy1R1AnEhJlc6XHh0/jZFFQeWyGel9LkYcCWSMzm uXfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532DiMcKCvWabHbBkD9UgcirA+tpDkTu+nlYqeyMGMC+6Q1fx70T LmhXhr/F7hyzb3inVWoVlGicWl3DL+77ff07hCVoMj5/XT8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwawpOR4TReeIkWsjk8O7BYx7jdTrClfhztETBFyfsIOTLYeUSTH31Hn/chVzHZ1WrKDIcJJNjLgb9CqaBLh4k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f28b:: with SMTP id gu11mr658239ejb.407.1598952955958; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 02:35:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sean Greven Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:35:44 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: pkg-fallout on one of the ports I maintain To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BghlK6g6Xz4FRD X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XzhFx7E3; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of seangreven@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::630 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=seangreven@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.52 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.037]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::630:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.495]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:36:00 -0000 Hi there I have received a number of messages from pkg-fallout regarding the port I maintain, and pkg-fallout maintains that my port is broken. The really strange thing here is that I am able to build it in all the versions up till 13.0-CURRENT. The port builds without any errors. Any one with any ideas on how to troubleshoot this further? Below is the last piece of the error returned from pkg-fallout. cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) *** [fwknop] Error code 1 make[3]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/fwknop/work/fwknop-2.6.10/client 1 error make[3]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/fwknop/work/fwknop-2.6.10/client ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 -- Regards Sean From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 09:46:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1473C0B01 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bgj021srFz4GFB for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD736139E7 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:46:50 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=tavi.co.uk; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=+K841rt 2XSWe5TIzBM+8twAjD6g=; b=N61gttcpi3YxmFLr78WQphIXennh8Jarrym13Ao 4TgcdTUJ9xDdhYHbf/DLVCulhKpmYb2DrB3NZXfLF8zYlIwIg44QYzKYqtECmlNg k7km4uXyXTBst4p1P3Mz9NwCrMTZ0p8CygoyRm3nQPT3PttxJZlay8xPhglEp1Ox 4/D8= Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) (Authenticated sender: rde@tavi.co.uk) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7A127139CF for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:46:50 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:46:52 +0100 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-fallout on one of the ports I maintain Message-ID: <20200901104652.6159b223@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bgj021srFz4GFB X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tavi.co.uk header.s=selector1 header.b=N61gttcp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tavi.co.uk; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rde@tavi.co.uk designates 81.187.145.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rde@tavi.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.41 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tavi.co.uk:s=selector1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.005]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:kipling.tavi.co.uk]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tavi.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tavi.co.uk,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.50)[-0.505]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20712, ipnet:81.187.0.0/16, country:GB]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:46:59 -0000 Almost certainly the -fno-common problem with clang 11. This now defaults to -fno-common, which causes multiply defined symbols at link time if something is declared global in more than one module (instead of extern in all but one module). There is a similar problem with gcc. Declaring -fno-common on your existing build will trigger the problem. What you are seeing (success) is because clang 11 isn't actually in -CURRENT yet. When I fixed my ports, I had to install (build) clang 11 (from llvm11) to do the testing. On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:35:44 +1000 Sean Greven wrote: > Hi there > > I have received a number of messages from pkg-fallout regarding the > port I maintain, and pkg-fallout maintains that my port is broken. > > The really strange thing here is that I am able to build it in all the > versions up till 13.0-CURRENT. > The port builds without any errors. Any one with any ideas on how to > troubleshoot this further? > > Below is the last piece of the error returned from pkg-fallout. > > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) *** [fwknop] Error code 1 > > make[3]: stopped in > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/fwknop/work/fwknop-2.6.10/client > 1 error > > make[3]: stopped in > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/fwknop/work/fwknop-2.6.10/client > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the > failure to the maintainer. > *** Error code 1 > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 09:54:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35A13C0CA4 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bgj931Kvvz4GDX; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0ca43d97; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:54:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=AVpwp8lf 7mF2zkM1e5+16sSU1js=; b=H3daZ7g6lzDaiO9gc02yjkhQWwiqgRBC8+OtWA6l pXoOMLemyMUNJXGRpAQAfmHVkeio2oXnbPdquDsyCqhyRuJLYzloNj5MIwg6rumA tUS7N/RkcpWlGQTm7inlpEETs/ouNEbLR+JykAKktNfJDTw026le7BZ2x+5HtAGE QouW0kk0vu0Vqs442OaKs1UGJeqOmMIEXHRgnyZp7iyHfW+XQO1QdS6NvKPeOqiE qFGEBRmwkLKTJ0N1xc84BuXoLgszdwAHOA4WYAN3qpQORlVrIUu8Kf2WBk863lbH LVxHjNL6TRHdzmelRv7YzvMenIVXkFVtJ4E/mdm7yigv0Q== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=b9 f+NYTzYJ4gGfKKlNQr0WF6SwwLCamIqeNHlU24CWcZ9+oUE++2sHVsWwbdnJcDXq g8SeC6B42s2bX8HLJTGk/cP6VAstV7L/C1uPbT8P8LvBxU7TUcArsrI1q8Clr3Tg FnD8bOnz1VoNdrX4/Bjj5fxBwfpKO/+4k943fRltFKXCEtwpn3IqJLkBDkRnCUf0 rkBi5yS7W066eM6ECKavywoF/qoF4nopLimme9bbwRW04CaG3MBxg6Z1s5jDs71H qpUD1wIWGD4Ml2BLCZ+9zFf0UniFxdJaixCOQwbr94kt8ld3fRB5Z5R2Wn9mnbzr /q9A7piCJ6+0JScy0Rbw== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4b38c735 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:54:25 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Wolfram Schneider Cc: Kurt Jaeger , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? Message-ID: <20200901115425.4da120d4@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20200826162041.2f7f9676@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826145330.GN3539@home.opsec.eu> <20200826180911.6c3303ff@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826163751.GO1265@fc.opsec.eu> <20200826184711.512a3b9c@bsd64.grem.de> <20200826165046.GP1265@fc.opsec.eu> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bgj931Kvvz4GDX X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=H3daZ7g6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.91 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; URL_IN_SUBJECT(1.00)[www.freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.031]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.38)[-0.380]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:54:48 -0000 On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:33:34 +0200 Wolfram Schneider wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 18:50, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only > > > > missing some job to regulary extract the latest > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/13.0-CURRENT/ports.txz > > > > > > > > for the current tree of the manuals. > > > > > > How does it actually create the pages though? > > > > wosch probably knows this. > > Indeed ;-) Thanks! > > The ports manual pages will be updated once when a new release comes > out. Maybe every 3-9 months. The update takes hours and a lot of > resources (60GB download of all packages and unpacking). > It would be cool if you could share the scriptwork that does this. Getting to a higher update frequency for ports would be really useful, but it feels like that this will require coordination between different teams/individuals. > -Wolfram Do you have any idea why the man page below isn't included? > > > E.g., the > > > man page paperless(7) created by deskutils/py-paperless [0] still > > > isn't available over man.cgi, even though the port was created a > > > long time before 12.1 was released and is in 12.1's ports.txz. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 12:12:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8771E3C5721 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgmDQ2pqZz4Qyl for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BgmDN4Xpbz3n48; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:12:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=daemonic.se; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:from:from:references:subject:subject:received :received; s=20151023; t=1598962371; bh=T/k2/Em/7gIPXcs5fRQVq0A3 FnZ53CNLPPQt5IqGrfs=; b=fCA4iNjmwhVU+Rwf+comvuNbDnn2pnwu231loMTJ uosD2CzbO8z62UetZWHDRgofZckS0TGj2r66TsPjZkL/smw9XiQ8pktY2rJ/1t38 SEYcUqfNobhqOcU6GpIpLmlaVla0wfa+jj/xAV/QhuUYNdY8kBB4uohgrmr9775y yi4= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id cK3aox-d764G; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [94.136.80.38]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BgmDM5m7sz3myt; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: pkg-fallout on one of the ports I maintain To: Bob Eager , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20200901104652.6159b223@raksha.tavi.co.uk> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: <2076493f-45dc-4c8f-16b4-4e62b056866a@daemonic.se> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:12:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200901104652.6159b223@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgmDQ2pqZz4Qyl X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=daemonic.se header.s=20151023 header.b=fCA4iNjm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=daemonic.se; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of zeising@daemonic.se designates 176.58.89.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zeising@daemonic.se X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[daemonic.se:s=20151023]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[zeising]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.995]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[daemonic.se:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[daemonic.se,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.02)[-0.025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:12:55 -0000 On 2020-09-01 11:46, Bob Eager wrote: > Almost certainly the -fno-common problem with clang 11. > > This now defaults to -fno-common, which causes multiply defined symbols > at link time if something is declared global in more than one module > (instead of extern in all but one module). There is a similar problem > with gcc. > > Declaring -fno-common on your existing build will trigger the problem. > > What you are seeing (success) is because clang 11 isn't actually in > -CURRENT yet. When I fixed my ports, I had to install (build) clang 11 > (from llvm11) to do the testing. llvm 11 is imported into FreeBSD 13-currrent since about two weeks. If you have an older current, or are on a release, you can either add -fno-common to CFLAGS to trigger the issue, or install llvm11 from ports and use that. Regards Niclas > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:35:44 +1000 > Sean Greven wrote: > >> Hi there >> >> I have received a number of messages from pkg-fallout regarding the >> port I maintain, and pkg-fallout maintains that my port is broken. >> >> The really strange thing here is that I am able to build it in all the >> versions up till 13.0-CURRENT. >> The port builds without any errors. Any one with any ideas on how to >> troubleshoot this further? >> >> Below is the last piece of the error returned from pkg-fallout. >> >> cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see >> invocation) *** [fwknop] Error code 1 >> >> make[3]: stopped in >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/fwknop/work/fwknop-2.6.10/client >> 1 error >> >> make[3]: stopped in >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/fwknop/work/fwknop-2.6.10/client >> ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. >> Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the >> failure to the maintainer. >> *** Error code 1 >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 14:39:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCF63CA80C for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgqV26dGQz4c4P for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kD7Ro-000NxV-2a; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:39:44 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:39:44 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Jamie Landeg-Jones Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored Message-ID: <20200901143944.GF53210@home.opsec.eu> References: <202009010853.0818r5jU090386@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202009010853.0818r5jU090386@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgqV26dGQz4c4P X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:39:55 -0000 Hi! > net-p2p/gtk-gnutella https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247914 This one fails on i386 current. See the PR itself for details. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 18:13:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C983D2636 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BgwDC0788z40cc for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 044773D2635; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041273D232C for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from router10G.digiware.nl (smtp.digiware.nl [176.74.240.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgwDB1tCBz40PX for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from router10g.digiware.nl (localhost.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) by router10G.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9161369D12; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:13:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.com Received: from router10G.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by router10g.digiware.nl (router10g.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYfNmZVdiUPD; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:13:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.9] (vaio [192.168.10.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by router10G.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11FAA69D11 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:13:12 +0200 (CEST) To: "ports@freebsd.org" From: Willem Jan Withagen Subject: What is: py3kplist??? Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:13:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: nl X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BgwDB1tCBz40PX X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wjw@digiware.nl designates 176.74.240.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wjw@digiware.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.44 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[router10g.digiware.nl]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[router10g.digiware.nl]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.05)[-1.046]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.36)[-0.355]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[digiware.nl]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.940]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:28878, ipnet:176.74.224.0/19, country:NL]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[176.74.240.9:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:13:15 -0000 Hi, In my ceph port one of the maintainers added this to USE_PYTHON=     cython py3kplist But I'm trying to find out what it does? And it is not (yet) on the USE_PYTHON page in the ports handbook. --WjW From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 1 21:13:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91679378B57 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane-mx.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.io (static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de [116.202.254.214]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bh0DF2MtGz4Gys for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane-mx.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDDVq-00082J-BT for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 23:08:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Re: What is: py3kplist??? Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 23:08:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.gmane.io In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bh0DF2MtGz4Gys X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-ports@m.gmane-mx.org designates 116.202.254.214 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-ports@m.gmane-mx.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.21 / 15.00]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; HFILTER_HOSTNAME_5(3.00)[static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.82)[-0.825]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.004]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.962]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rakuco@FreeBSD.org,freebsd-ports@m.gmane-mx.org]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FORGED_MUA_THUNDERBIRD_MSGID_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rakuco@FreeBSD.org,freebsd-ports@m.gmane-mx.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:116.202.0.0/16, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:13:37 -0000 On 9/1/20 8:13 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > In my ceph port one of the maintainers added this to > > USE_PYTHON=     cython py3kplist > > But I'm trying to find out what it does? > And it is not (yet) on the USE_PYTHON page in the ports handbook. It's documented in Mk/Uses/python.mk: # py3kplist - Automatically generates Python 3.x compatible # __pycache__ entries from a Python 2.x packaging list # when defined. Use this for ports that do *not* use # standard Python packaging mechanisms such as # distutils, and support *both* Python 2.x and 3.x. # Not needed, if USE_PYTHON=autoplist is set. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 2 05:30:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4973CCEB4 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 05:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BhCFN62MBz4GtX for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 05:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0825ULlH063804 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0825ULaY063803; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:30:20 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: bob prohaska Subject: Success at last on Pi3 aarch64, was Re: Firefox build failure Message-ID: <20200902053020.GA63778@www.zefox.net> References: <20200830154829.GA53905@www.zefox.net> <20200830154938.GB53905@www.zefox.net> <0102017441506207-d654b79e-fe91-4fbd-89f8-7b923265fbc7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <20200830215220.GA55065@www.zefox.net> <20200831153559.GA58133@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200831153559.GA58133@www.zefox.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BhCFN62MBz4GtX X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.94 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.21)[-0.206]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.82)[-0.816]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.06)[0.057]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 05:30:19 -0000 On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 08:35:59AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > In the meantime a clean restart is going, it looks like firefox > got bumped to version 80. Perhaps that'll make a difference. To > conserve resources I'm using a plain vanilla make. If use of a > ports management system is mandatory please warn me. > After a few false starts (my own errors) make completed successfully and the resulting binary seems to run. If anybody can offer a hint how to get uBlock Origin to install it would be most helpful. The extensions manager invites "Add to Firefox" but after several minutes of the wagging progress dot seems to give up without installing anything. Thanks for everyone's help, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 2 07:50:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C683CF9CA for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BhGMD5whjz4NgR for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C977C3CF9C8; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E43CFF18 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BhGMD538hz4NpG for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 905BA27340 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0827oW2O000200 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0827oWHp000199; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202009020750.0827oWHp000199@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:50:32 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 07:50:33 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/xaos | 4.1 | release-4.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/micropython | 1.5.1 | v1.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/afni | 20.2.14 | afni_20.2.16 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 2 14:45:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BC43D9367 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BhRYk3ctWz4pNN for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1kDU0Y-004Inh-Ej; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:45:06 +0200 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 082EiafA002304 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:44:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 082EiaTx002303 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:44:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: pkg-fallout: duplicate symbols? Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:44:36 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <9A44A7E3-B911-4D40-B34F-FC1A9E844D31@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BhRYk3ctWz4pNN X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.90 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[news]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.53)[-0.529]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.62)[0.620]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.61)[0.609]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:45:15 -0000 On 2020-08-22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > It can be worked around by adding -fcommon to the compilation flags, but > in most cases it should not be too difficult to get rid of the multiply > defined symbols. Right. In C, a global is _defined_ in one object file and _declared_ when it is referenced from elsewhere. See Kernighan & Ritchie. Commons are a linker artifact that was never part of the C language, as far as I can tell. Most instances turned up by -fno-common are accidental double definitions of the same global, so you only need to turn the extra definitions into declarations. However, in some cases they were actually intended as separate variables and have been merged by accident. In those cases, they should be renamed or made local with "static". -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 2 14:58:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B3E3D991E for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BhRrt0d9Cz4q1Q for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC8B139E6 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:58:15 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=tavi.co.uk; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=Viqc588 OmG560t23ehenetsvb6A=; b=kKRzDKhgTqy3BlsMFvYZWgU7MiKYlUTu4mn0X0l w98t0JU13lkKlfdWDlKb/DWDAl52MCwakAU2zXvbHIO5/x135dmbp1GTL+FsLaZ3 qZeNDJAJZSuW0BFdNrswd9GQnRGXNDRVjqPFxWlOyRjqFfhUZuo0FC30t5uh95mr T4qU= Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) (Authenticated sender: rde@tavi.co.uk) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 47C84139CF for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:58:15 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:58:15 +0100 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-fallout: duplicate symbols? Message-ID: <20200902155815.62588c0d@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <9A44A7E3-B911-4D40-B34F-FC1A9E844D31@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BhRrt0d9Cz4q1Q X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tavi.co.uk header.s=selector1 header.b=kKRzDKhg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tavi.co.uk; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rde@tavi.co.uk designates 81.187.145.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rde@tavi.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.87 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tavi.co.uk:s=selector1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.961]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:kipling.tavi.co.uk]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.012]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.00)[0.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tavi.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tavi.co.uk,none]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20712, ipnet:81.187.0.0/16, country:GB]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:58:23 -0000 On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:44:36 -0000 (UTC) Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2020-08-22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > It can be worked around by adding -fcommon to the compilation > > flags, but in most cases it should not be too difficult to get rid > > of the multiply defined symbols. > > Right. > In C, a global is _defined_ in one object file and _declared_ when > it is referenced from elsewhere. See Kernighan & Ritchie. Commons > are a linker artifact that was never part of the C language, as far > as I can tell. > > Most instances turned up by -fno-common are accidental double > definitions of the same global, so you only need to turn the extra > definitions into declarations. However, in some cases they were > actually intended as separate variables and have been merged by > accident. In those cases, they should be renamed or made local > with "static". In some cases, it is deliberate. An initialised, but declared, global is used as a 'weak' global that can be overridden by checking its value. I maintain one port that does this! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 2 15:01:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C463D9AB0 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BhRwR5mMKz4qdR for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A7E139E7 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:01:26 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=tavi.co.uk; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=kSh7t7X jGqfvoq74k0pwUp54OfI=; b=UNTSjchVuQXahoPSBR2vvoeM5tZ41y/hfHaS4Fj n708S19rj7haDao7IazTAMk7Ms4t57XQmIHnr9d48r85mFh9nyHXvwxJkL7Swifp w4+mXppJlIVCb9x3+ts1BsO6F94oX8WHJqfEs0DQLvVollUfPNscnmh28OYgizbF VkIQ= Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) (Authenticated sender: rde@tavi.co.uk) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A04E2139CF for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:01:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:01:26 +0100 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-fallout: duplicate symbols? Message-ID: <20200902160126.25bab002@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20200902155815.62588c0d@raksha.tavi.co.uk> References: <9A44A7E3-B911-4D40-B34F-FC1A9E844D31@FreeBSD.org> <20200902155815.62588c0d@raksha.tavi.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BhRwR5mMKz4qdR X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tavi.co.uk header.s=selector1 header.b=UNTSjchV; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tavi.co.uk; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rde@tavi.co.uk designates 81.187.145.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rde@tavi.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tavi.co.uk:s=selector1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.960]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:kipling.tavi.co.uk:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.014]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tavi.co.uk:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tavi.co.uk,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.01)[-0.012]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20712, ipnet:81.187.0.0/16, country:GB]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:01:28 -0000 On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:58:15 +0100 Bob Eager wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:44:36 -0000 (UTC) > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > On 2020-08-22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > > It can be worked around by adding -fcommon to the compilation > > > flags, but in most cases it should not be too difficult to get rid > > > of the multiply defined symbols. > > > > Right. > > In C, a global is _defined_ in one object file and _declared_ when > > it is referenced from elsewhere. See Kernighan & Ritchie. Commons > > are a linker artifact that was never part of the C language, as far > > as I can tell. > > > > Most instances turned up by -fno-common are accidental double > > definitions of the same global, so you only need to turn the extra > > definitions into declarations. However, in some cases they were > > actually intended as separate variables and have been merged by > > accident. In those cases, they should be renamed or made local > > with "static". > > In some cases, it is deliberate. An initialised, but declared, global > is used as a 'weak' global that can be overridden by checking its > value. > > I maintain one port that does this! Of course, I meant 'uninitialised! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 4 17:46:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0BF3CA23E for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BjlTz0cdNz4Mjp for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 132453CA287; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E6D3CA23D for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BjlTy1r8wz4Mm0 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b19so8911977lji.11 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:46:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:subject:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQHZP1B7mavTVkklZA+fs58pYRPoZRYdid5E53MwjE4=; b=Ro0PUcmDYnDnLsUPIZDISRPps8zVK6NmtX8YxTCJ8lwRaxhMl0b6Jo5ZJi7RBvnJBc HVY6LpqZDiyC9fTudu6iZjSvBhojRadLjb1YsUbF/s/PssCVAxUx5HmyMhfESlX7Atoc alCE9sLAz3GQk8TZNjsooArIQaqqDZBSaXYFuJmMR2UncXGHUGCdYZD4XeWClIOlXizv phelui7Po6jms1bK/NMxOdLsW5HAv1d03XPTb/awFRf6+RucmoRjKcOBvvTM/nFxISk7 udi5b+4rppR8raWtsYu/JTx9QV54p6n2RxxINsdVpE6viACqK+s2EGY7t8LwnZgh7FT+ v6TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:from:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQHZP1B7mavTVkklZA+fs58pYRPoZRYdid5E53MwjE4=; b=mcFgc+KSeiCaWeXBPKxFEjJ1EzyWo+gTazo6DOad9FrVZle47k4sbjnHRVauSfzYK2 ha0BSrpqL/yPak20ba7+dYwarPqIzUulRpfsECMA93nor+Q+ztqVS8+NEu1k83U7fZHs /NnAytFoLpDxTMDGw6Cy0G8kxjRHsbGPmUQtXZDviohx6uwHHDBvCTp8DFCiT6gkTTgU 3ZQs8OrInLUlD/ggCllwvzWY3qzz+Uc9p8x62xawv7VBIolJlViT4l96ZTbrivoOy77s WuYZ75w1dDABTvkcc2glkEuIWiDVgLV9RlfwP1K5RLBM6avhf1YBISdEeZyfvNDFPxni TTNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ccuq2sm+dVykbZUXz+6WoUSOmu7sUm5rVhEQk8GHe+20yyFNp OJmMUfYfZc7GDGaLZ8qOd5sjFGTHHNU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0sKbHWsRBsoVCbYPGnglzJIHb1Ud3KlsW0ufI7ZJT92LJuHq3jxMffXW6wCjJlDwNjGRPJw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9143:: with SMTP id q3mr4637943ljg.253.1599241588158; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alex.super (stone.g-service.ru. [84.22.141.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 69sm1409822lfm.83.2020.09.04.10.46.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:46:27 -0700 (PDT) To: henry.hu.sh@gmail.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: telegram-desktop-2.3.2 error update From: "Alex V. Petrov" Autocrypt: addr=alexvpetrov@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFr3oA0BEADMSXiVd/IwYhJPMQ6LXbZ7jTA/RXuzrGYaR++UENx5QJ6/HJ/3myTeMnZE nNa0Zme+oKw/9s5x7rBTP6mL5ta7VSYpnPX932mAjT9J4nS7iW/wWNBqcXn7wDCog2TV8Ww3 13SUP2YaKoJKJLxddiZD6AJrkafB9EE/AycMQ8XxMao1lVS+/KAo0yciOsnSlIJCWhF00b3j xDlHLvehrDa4S3EB13bF6uE0XU5nFfMNHtBav2mwD9t01hNioCNTV1hXwmsS/L1n5PR5FyJJ yYtjeohrAUiGKGJU9lJJ6tROBhzV/k3OsOGPyajFOVsW0vUueYfgw+IAPYdOZIAONgNdxkvs tRLQxYPCBMN1FvQ7GlIhq7ob+mxuA1imXx3xzlYy5tu4QzB383qZtLqQnZpysjYooAbHl+eN vB2ldvH9TZxm3fxxNL6zgYAXE/pNgFoqg/ILmhDwvvHzApHqVCKU3g6yii0KPxD7susaUWcL JYgrmt2BIE0RuiQRGWyS0L277D/YGmVnPNHxPi58DBs2iexDm7jw7PhlmfOw44N9w+O09D2S gqmBHySAtsq9Z5LoM81F+LrOoVmpYczZWErS917Gua1X7K3wrXoqQC8qcSiHZpEcBl/Uohii QWzjQJot5LT7rvfFHpnSOXAKgN7enVM7KxTJAYK1U343GGdepQARAQABtDZBbGV4VlBldHJv diAoZmlyc3QgZ2xvYmFsIGtleSkgPGFsZXh2cGV0cm92QGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JAk4EEwEIADgW IQRvKPTT2TJuh37ANx313p8aVpVkcAUCWvegDQIbAwULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX gAAKCRD13p8aVpVkcLLeEADClYAElEInGGjtLfH4jdjvTDaQTsrwT5/1E5/h8yxI4yn7hCt1 Dh+iCSUNLdPO88nZV2jP8bMQXFBKSbC0nAJXd8O+8t9AfSWoUC6IMzncxKTK/jZuJTCToCUR XZ+47+uJaBp51rpw3pFX8UrFlYSF6Dz97dI2cGHfx3xAOnowKxyHfthxS8waKWgbMOceds78 BP2+Q0iLCpoC9rO4KDc+w+h8z21eHIE9VHadTHpnKVF82voPH8XWvznTOCpYrdBwUtIyD/DV XRb0xcFsOSkvmReYX7u4QuOPLSc86sEWh4hXTFLAOdfeTjrDTDmBcmFpltmW1j+5t4mI1dK8 gptREM8gMJVJw3jjcO6jADeXX9q5C8/lX0sEGz9uC4oU5nkOMyfzd9Anb+9bCs7pMxhqAKjA 8tqJPPkmJU8WzMCs+uudIiQ8W9qIETwUJWxizQ3kvlzLfWRz5n93Y9kzSmjw81aiIJK/HFY8 wsW5zNo6JBn57cMPx8nBC4E2zM09ffmqSpjDwXfvZF2IIR8L4VTiKi3ovwLglJP+Qbs5HXNn 6K40cPNqfnHzPLwXwd/co04B/VVr+cKZuE58kYGty9Xs9q/SEpObDnxnLxMNHUNJJuRgOiti TKDkteHuKm6NA8v05o3TDQ5HU9szEoE5uoi/3pQ1ktfA/K3LkDwbotXL+7kCDQRa96ANARAA w5+/xcaCP6iwsi2CFQ4pAWksdmPBEHA2VPn1ym3C6opjbyWUp6sn25eTWppdhA9rUqbM/zV/ hAFRT67oZJKBYNRaMoDdO8BsVZsg/u76QF/GuhbUjIk0tFFdpddMXl0zKAJJMCfDRxURRWv7 NW6sY/EZ4Dal5s4xOT+UrWGag3qoaIRdzw5bJRP+o75L90cE8pd7+Pd9cVJOOtTAwx0E4bPq dPSa6CPDSvzd9D3mw37dPzXysyQkQTy0OM7255E2wjYz3RbJxB3utybPVN3XJBD5EyA8IYeS ic1/03UrkRNv4XrLnlg7xLv96ZeCrf/BDNQW23iVwbISUAk4TXL7xs2TGYOmowZ89mMEcbfW ChX3YLAuAeWzgpMcrDC00izOxG0spkkrHL7/i1iSu2MKhv5qMTVgchlSktdd+KTba5keleHv ULQ3feGUKf9eTkKgES6q4rKrae0tIwByTLhhDVbkXqR6v8zrpJSscrvJ3tMNgquJKy5ATIUB nvUE2hMkSwtnJ2vQ/Z0zGt6c5KxI57/hsb148tXp1v3gAq9d6i8c8ChxSR/kUlqAvzl2QGcn CFVN6nfOzyNfBPZ61abNzkzjzyhOK4Gq4gQvx4QXhDp3jEME7rPM0Tqf0venb1Dp7SIHwggV yJglGApwoUvD4kKNIC7KDr+s/UjbBp4ExFMAEQEAAYkCNgQYAQgAIBYhBG8o9NPZMm6HfsA3 HfXenxpWlWRwBQJa96ANAhsMAAoJEPXenxpWlWRwAaEQAKm0imG5Fm37JZi+5faXJv/ZLZGl r4TVg4u1kMktdTQRrTXa3Qs0i3wTtOZe1p3xCCzPx+97iYETHragDTdAFUO+v+Llin26L1Zl z4huyIqgGSuTuekQfn6eoMZbcF+wzah4j/mvXQVpJBF2qQi1YdHSapWDlweuiuk01y8C3eHv 3qfFB/OJwXhwj0HKhkGkB2dLXuLtIk4GCXh4/g22tWz/SB0gsSXU7WhJFb0CyxETGR9YKxM8 CNl5tVRLqsBC6yQLvcAJgJci73PfMiHKnjxrz//+0xQO1TPeruWsd8nLYvziT38CyX42Mbaj 01WpvB0qOeTGtwGFmyyrnE8fYpd3CE0uAl9BnHqafAabl9+09x3wf+lEkkO2bK59akZz3BPU 8Lz2BAgskyS81WZCthQYUrUozFEx/31x8JJ95EQFNW9t8HBa51r4QhedSNKxLbT3Sx8hH0iq Z8wYkGw0og9U1DqgFzxE2HSGZSDG3I1DrPDqhcM/6Y0V98wS+XreuS88DYYck37+L7bTGiyZ WYFNZk1ChcIBk8hgKn5nFOCWO2rX06RI9zorzSpEg6lB2STae1Up5oEj8QqfYmfO3cp2Qhvj F3c2/i8KpWkJQkAgNrv428FIlx9SiPu9gvNTTYuLIOdZLQvInTmKs2uCoB6JDAW75axDhBbR FvM3Vpv/ Message-ID: <9794fa65-a359-07bb-c12e-96057f00d711@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 00:46:25 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: ru Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BjlTy1r8wz4Mm0 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ro0PUcmD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of alexvpetrov@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alexvpetrov@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.52 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.536]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::22e:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:46:31 -0000 ===> FAILED to apply cleanly FreeBSD patch(es) patch-Telegram_cmake_lib__tgvoip.cmake *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-im/telegram-desktop *** Error code 1 Stop. -- ----- Alex. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 4 18:22:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EAA3CB328 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BjmHb3dF2z4QG4 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7C71F3CAEFA; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3693CAF54 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BjmHb2lMNz4Py0 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-yb1-f175.google.com (mail-yb1-f175.google.com [209.85.219.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: lwhsu/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D1AC1B6F7 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-yb1-f175.google.com with SMTP id p6so5034655ybk.10 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:22:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fM6ZkgSt9r4HxKakCtAtC2w+zJRGJc6QVxS/13vCnBmNTvsmR XcFgvNpF3gGkKZELXBRhf8C3Kw3Ma2zAA37N6mw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1zxOpy3fOcxiAaRctnepi4nyH9iFRFBXA+tUl5xc0dhE7D1UNaEDjCbCfEpJkFg8T0lyA6NUtVulvmQtLQiw= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d210:: with SMTP id j16mr12332627ybg.451.1599243754751; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:22:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9794fa65-a359-07bb-c12e-96057f00d711@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9794fa65-a359-07bb-c12e-96057f00d711@gmail.com> From: Li-Wen Hsu Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 02:22:23 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: telegram-desktop-2.3.2 error update To: "Alex V. Petrov" Cc: henry.hu.sh@gmail.com, FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:22:35 -0000 On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 1:46 AM Alex V. Petrov wrote: > > ===> FAILED to apply cleanly FreeBSD patch(es) > patch-Telegram_cmake_lib__tgvoip.cmake > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-im/telegram-desktop > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. Thanks for reporting, this should be fixed in r547560. Li-Wen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 5 07:29:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131083E3C5E for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bk5lP6pYbz44QK for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E97DE3E3D3E; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90FF3E3DAE for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bk5lP5z8fz44LP for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3741A687 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0857TLMF033186 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0857TLSI033185; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202009050729.0857TLSI033185@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:29:21 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 07:29:22 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-wm/awesome-vicious | 2.4.1 | v2.4.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout!