From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 05:34:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8D825E2E2; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ZqmT1Y8jz4NRh; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1129) id C27CB2236A; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:30 +0000 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-01 Message-ID: <20200308053430.GA46059@freefall.freebsd.org> Reply-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 05:34:34 -0000 (Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-01 =================================== Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2020-02-24 to 2020-03-01. During this period, we have: * 1930 builds (87.4% (-0.3) passed, 12.6% (+0.3) failed) of buildworld and buildkernel (GENERIC and LINT) were executed on aarch64, amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 288 test runs (77.5% (+10.7) passed, 21.5% (-8.8) unstable, 1.0% (-1.9) exception) were executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 17 doc and www builds (94.1% (-1.9) passed, 5.9% (+1.9) failed) Test case status (on 2020-03-01 23:59): | Branch/Architecture | Total | Pass | Fail | Skipped | | ------------------- | -------- | --------- | ------ | ------- | | head/amd64 | 7699 (0) | 7598 (-3) | 9 (+3) | 92 (0) | | head/i386 | 7697 (0) | 7590 (-3) | 9 (+3) | 98 (0) | | 12-STABLE/amd64 | 7501 (0) | 7452 (+8) | 0 (0) | 49 (-8) | | 12-STABLE/i386 | 7499 (0) | 7442 (-8) | 0 (0) | 57 (+8) | | 11-STABLE/amd64 | 6878 (0) | 6828 (-3) | 0 (0) | 50 (+3) | | 11-STABLE/i386 | 6876 (0) | 6827 (+3) | 0 (0) | 49 (-3) | (The statistics from experimental jobs are omitted) If any of the issues found by CI are in your area of interest or expertise please investigate the PRs listed below. The latest web version of this report is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/report-20200301 and archive is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/ , any help is welcome. ## Failed and Fixed tests * sys.netpfil.pf.fragmentation.v6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244393 * 9 sys.audit. tests https://bugs.freebsd.org/244537 ## Regressions * fusefs tests fail when mac_bsdextended.ko is loaded https://bugs.freebsd.org/244229 * `dtrace -c` causes program dumps core after somewhere between (r357694, r357701] https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * Lock-order reversals triggered by tests under sys.net.if_lagg_test.* on i386 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress panics i386 kernel https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * (test case) sys.geom.class.multipath.misc.fail_on_error (on 12-STABLE) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244158 ## Failing and Flaky tests (from experimental jobs) * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-dtrace_test/ * cddl.usr.sbin.dtrace.common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/ * There are ~13 failing and ~109 skipped cases, including flakey ones, see https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ for more details * Work for cleaning these failing cass are in progress * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_ltp/ * Total 3670 tests (0), 2285 success (-5), 579 failures (+5), 806 skipped (0) ## Disabled Tests * sys.fs.tmpfs.mount_test.large https://bugs.freebsd.org/212862 * sys.fs.tmpfs.link_test.kqueue https://bugs.freebsd.org/213662 * sys.kqueue.libkqueue.kqueue_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/233586 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__PT_KILL_competing_stop https://bugs.freebsd.org/220841 * lib.libc.regex.exhaust_test.regcomp_too_big (i386 only) https://bugs.freebsd.org/237450 * sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 * sys.netpfil.pf.names.names * sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 * lib.libc.gen.getmntinfo_test.getmntinfo_test https://bugs.freebsd.org/240049 * sys.sys.qmath_test.qdivq_s64q https://bugs.freebsd.org/240219 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__getppid https://bugs.freebsd.org/240510 * lib.libc.sys.stat_test.stat_socket https://bugs.freebsd.org/240621 * lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_write_filter_zstd https://bugs.freebsd.org/240683 * lib.libcasper.services.cap_dns.dns_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/241435 * local.kyua.* (31 cases) & local.lutok.* (3 cases) on 11-i386 https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-11-i386-test/2278/testReport/ * sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/242689 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__procdesc_reparent_wait_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/243605 * skip sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_wait_after_attach https://bugs.freebsd.org/244055 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_exits_before_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/244056 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.witness (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 * PipePdfork.WildcardWait in sys.capsicum.capsicum-test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/244165 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 * sys.netinet6.frag6.frag6_07.frag6_07 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244170 * sys.netinet.fibs_test.udp_dontroute6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244172 ## Issues ### Cause build fails * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233735 Possible build race: genoffset.o /usr/src/sys/sys/types.h: error: machine/endian.h: No such file or directory * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233769 Possible build race: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s ### Cause kernel panics * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 sys.netpfil.pf.names.names and sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy cause panic Patch exists: * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20868 * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20869 ### Open * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237403 Tests in sys/opencrypto should be converted to Python3 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 Flakey test case: common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237656 "Freed UMA keg (rtentry) was not empty (18 items). Lost 1 pages of memory." seen when running sys/netipsec tests * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero does not work when mac_portacl(4) loaded * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/241662 Flakey test case: lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_fuzz_iso9660 ### Others * [Tickets related to testing@](https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9maauwg) From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 19:34:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20B42734C0 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bBPF3vhjz3C5q for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 40A372734BE; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E642734BA; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bBPC6Q6Lz3C30; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bBP30L40z3lvf; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:33:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id WB7xPhTHUU3K; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:c079:be8f:8479:372c]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48bBP22Btcz3lcX; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) To: x11@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: x11@FreeBSD.org From: Niclas Zeising Subject: users of drm-legacy-kmod or drm drivers from base Message-ID: <6413dbc6-a64e-b69a-ffcc-9c555df24e71@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 20:33:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bBPC6Q6Lz3C30 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.957,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.961,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 19:34:09 -0000 [ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum visibility. Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x11@FreeBSD.org . Thank you! ] In order to improve support for the new lkpi based graphics drivers (drm-kmod) and to improve the graphics stack we have switched mesa to prefer DRI3 over DRI2. This was done in r528071. For those using drm-kmod, this should improve performance somewhat, and more importantly alleviate the use of the FIXDRM option (now removed) in xorg-server. However, for those of you using graphics/drm-legacy-kmod or the drm drivers in base, this change can cause issues. If you are experiencing problems when running OpenGL applications, you can force the use of the DRI2 backend. To force mesa to use DRI2, set the environment variable LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE to 1 before starting any OpenGL application. The easiest way to accomplish this is by adding it to either your shell startup file or ~/.xinitrc. As an example, for users of [t]csh, put setenv LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE 1 in ~/.cshrc. For users of bourne type shells (sh, bash, ksh, zsh, ...) instead put export LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1 in ~/.profile If you are using these legacy drivers, I'm also very interested in hearing what issues you are facing that prevents you from using the new lkpi based drivers. Regards -- Niclas Zeising FreeBSD Graphics Team From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 21:13:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6D7276406; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 21:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from alpine.spintel.net.au (alpine.spintel.net.au [203.23.236.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bDbZ29J0z4Z08; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 21:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from drunkfish.andyit.com.au (210-1-210-40-cpe.spintel.net.au [210.1.210.40]) by alpine.spintel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49B84C0904; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:06:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mater.andyit.com.au (mater.andyit.com.au [172.22.2.22]) by drunkfish.andyit.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 028L6VpZ039296 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:06:31 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Subject: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: From: Andy Farkas Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:06:31 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-AU X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bDbZ29J0z4Z08 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andyf@andyit.com.au has no SPF policy when checking 203.23.236.77) smtp.mailfrom=andyf@andyit.com.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[andyit.com.au]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(3.61)[ip: (9.37), ipnet: 203.23.236.0/24(4.69), asn: 18390(3.96), country: AU(0.01)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.96)[0.963,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[77.236.23.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:18390, ipnet:203.23.236.0/24, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 21:13:15 -0000 On 2020-03-09 04:15, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235564 > > --- Comment #8 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- > A commit references this bug: > > Author: emaste > Date: Sun Mar 8 18:14:45 UTC 2020 > New revision: 358758 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/358758 > > Log: > MFC r355585: remove nonexistent from-* entries from vt INDEX.keymaps Is anyone actually working on the vt(4) driver?  Will it ever become feature-parity with the old sc(4) driver? I've noticed some weird things happening on my console recently... like psychedelicly-colour-coded kernel messages.. far out, man. Just wondering, -andyf From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 22:46:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E1025054C for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 22:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bGg63YB4z4HG7 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 22:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 028Mkb3Q051220 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 8 Mar 2020 15:46:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: In-Reply-To: From: Chris Reply-To: bsd-lists@BSDforge.com To: Andy Farkas Subject: Re: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 15:46:43 -0700 Message-Id: <18be277f2f8681c860abfabb97246749@udns.ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bGg63YB4z4HG7 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bsd-lists@BSDforge.com has no SPF policy when checking 24.113.41.81) smtp.mailfrom=bsd-lists@BSDforge.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.52 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bsd-lists@BSDforge.com]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.18)[-0.176,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.27)[ip: (-0.48), ipnet: 24.113.0.0/16(-0.24), asn: 11404(-0.56), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[BSDforge.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 22:46:29 -0000 On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:06:31 +1000 Andy Farkas andyf@andyit=2Ecom=2Eau said > On 2020-03-09 04:15, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd=2Eorg wrote: > > https://bugs=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/bugzilla/show_bug=2Ecgi?id=3D235564 > > > > --- Comment #8 from commit-hook@freebsd=2Eorg --- > > A commit references this bug: > > > > Author: emaste > > Date: Sun Mar 8 18:14:45 UTC 2020 > > New revision: 358758 > > URL: https://svnweb=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/changeset/base/358758 > > > > Log: > > MFC r355585: remove nonexistent from-* entries from vt INDEX=2Ekeymaps >=20 >=20 > Is anyone actually working on the vt(4) driver?=C2=A0 Will it ever >=20 > become feature-parity with the old sc(4) driver? >=20 >=20 > I've noticed some weird things happening on my console recently=2E=2E=2E >=20 > like psychedelicly-colour-coded kernel messages=2E=2E far out, man=2E >=20 >=20 > Just wondering, >=20 >=20 > -andyf Thanks for bringing this up=2E I've been meaning to ask similar=2E When building a custom kernel, and including sc(4)=2E Then adding kern=2Evt=3Dsc to loader=2Econf(5)=2E I'm presented with rainbow text=2E I wouldn't mind so much *except* that it's color choices, and places are simply *random* Thanks in advance for any insight on this=2E :) --Chris >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list > https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg" From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 14:38:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6419E2641AE; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com (mail-io1-f68.google.com [209.85.166.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bgnB0Bphz494q; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id n21so9310882ioo.10; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:38:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZYP9rOe200+HkO1FbhmAxkU1exzinmyjLej1njCkjWs=; b=chsIoKt8VwLiGBufzlGOSWFn9awRi6/HfVnq32ZPNa3bzE+cgCxX9mahV17Q4y4ApT wb7xn5YWTnrkwSEf5z5YqknN025xSu/K+04I7pB2WXXxLLhB0lC5ThRsJogvT57xJS8P TnOHMVvjDAyJibiGFnucoHn431giogucTDxTnttAJfn9e6MGpVTgsmoiAKfj9USPon4t RWhw/p6DwsMJswlRp9C2csB17zFSR7S9QNDZGO4Od1A9tHJ2PLmnbkD/q3YYm1A1gGWb lqZBDDUakkaEPOfXA9HtPScCbk4K97VnMxscrnsBtZ7f/PCMP/IlbqiiYP9jlp6DizGs IQxg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ31r2VNfI670CYu+KV/YfxGqmqcb3Ij3yqVx7HIjPr0SxAq9MPt XKHE38PtVv0DTlPJaQz95AVZ1QedqzmNKfntoLs2nO/n X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuQKffzPLvj4Ei54qd57cgFUEivbsjdszNVpHuHC5xuAAf3bU4jjwtccs32816y0oqv1S95aZR7faR4kkXv0qQ= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8204:: with SMTP id l4mr13918516iom.31.1583764684474; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:38:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:37:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] To: Andy Farkas Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bgnB0Bphz494q X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.29)[ip: (-1.78), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.98), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[68.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:38:07 -0000 On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 17:13, Andy Farkas wrote: > > Is anyone actually working on the vt(4) driver? Will it ever > become feature-parity with the old sc(4) driver? Yes, and yes. What specific missing functionality are you affected by? > I've noticed some weird things happening on my console recently... > like psychedelicly-colour-coded kernel messages.. far out, man. I don't think this is related to vt(4), but it would help if you provided more details (including the version you're running). From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 15:04:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C69F265624; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bhN726qcz3LwB; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 029F4WLL077369 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:04:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua 029F4WLL077369 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 029F4Wr6077368; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:04:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:04:32 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Ed Maste Cc: Andy Farkas , freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable stable Subject: Re: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] Message-ID: <20200309150432.GR98340@kib.kiev.ua> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on tom.home X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bhN726qcz3LwB X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2001:470:d5e7:1::1 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kostikbel@gmail.com) smtp.mailfrom=kostikbel@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-3.12), ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.65), asn: 6939(-3.59), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[gmail.com : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:04:56 -0000 On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:37:52AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 17:13, Andy Farkas wrote: > > > > Is anyone actually working on the vt(4) driver? Will it ever > > become feature-parity with the old sc(4) driver? > > Yes, and yes. What specific missing functionality are you affected by? > > > I've noticed some weird things happening on my console recently... > > like psychedelicly-colour-coded kernel messages.. far out, man. > > I don't think this is related to vt(4), but it would help if you > provided more details (including the version you're running). Take a look at r334530. From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 17:41:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301E126892C for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-f176.google.com (mail-il1-f176.google.com [209.85.166.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48blrF5h0dz4TPP for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-f176.google.com with SMTP id p1so5462360ils.12 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oTjWhh8enD9+tDLiE3QpXiO5l5U7hnAcF/GfD7sbCxk=; b=Zhs58kojN5czeYF7hJpRRM0JAcI7T6KCHBbJ9FidDD7XBvs+7YTwQLamTdxSzn14Je i8shNzXhbGaA8osyrF4gtor0RbVCYhqtssttCrS6b/NHx8DorT55MzDgCzplNRC9/Y0n O7SCFhGOBZ3kcCORaxnHmj8I9DNtQtrS39SBpabdujyBtveSxPtzFMOa9l4HFx4VUlnA FoPqffzaJ4d+wQT4+Tboup08E18YWAeoTuXUkPv0MwmXMYy0hah35HhYpq0U/HAIVDOe 2+IAwifxfm9vaCfhBd6v6JwgrJqu5gvMSGTAw5Q1zdig9rRUPSxmZ9C5/nAjWsKJT2Q9 7E8A== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3QIaL+jHH5C25SNTLIjOOAeQI7kVWdEawq7Dfis8Gv7G9i8CDe ygwhsmzpBVLU+fwTmeml0OEpDAh3d+6VKjgt6UammCTn X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtvVJS9m+/Op5Par9e1bcA9oFlD3ORyVwER/0jJiPQh04S1wYaAapwJR9tD3snmMjCpf7rJGz7J+GIcDdxcht8= X-Received: by 2002:a92:41c7:: with SMTP id o190mr6121232ila.11.1583775659815; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 10:40:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:40:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any sync-serial driver users (ce/cp/ctau/cx)? To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-stable stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48blrF5h0dz4TPP X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; IP_SCORE(-1.98)[ip: (-5.21), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.98), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[176.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[176.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 17:41:03 -0000 On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 14:03, Ed Maste wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 15:57, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > Given the ~15 years of nothing but API changes to these cards, and the lack of testing of those changes, and the large technology transitions in net and tty layers of the system, I'd honestly be surprised if these drivers still work. > > Deprecation notices in review D23928 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23928. > > As rgrimes points out cx(4) is for an ISA card (Cronyx Sigma family), > and I assume there's no conflict over removing it. Likewise with ctau, > which is also ISA, discontinued by the manufacturer and not supported > in FreeBSD 7+ by them. I've MFC'd the deprecation notices for cx and ctau and will remove them from HEAD before too long. glebius@ is going to follow up with Cronyx for more details about the cards supported by ce and cp. I would still appreciate any report that these drivers have been used / tested on contemporary FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 19:14:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5974926A976; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from alpine.spintel.net.au (alpine.spintel.net.au [203.23.236.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bnwc70Qqz3xZ0; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from drunkfish.andyit.com.au (210-1-210-40-cpe.spintel.net.au [210.1.210.40]) by alpine.spintel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 057E64C05CE; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:14:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mater.andyit.com.au (mater.andyit.com.au [172.22.2.22]) by drunkfish.andyit.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 029JEnA9013329 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:14:50 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Subject: Re: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable stable References: <20200309150432.GR98340@kib.kiev.ua> From: Andy Farkas Message-ID: <8df70772-faee-bd07-612f-696e8a1d477c@andyit.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:14:49 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200309150432.GR98340@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-AU X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bnwc70Qqz3xZ0 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andyf@andyit.com.au has no SPF policy when checking 203.23.236.77) smtp.mailfrom=andyf@andyit.com.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[andyit.com.au]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(3.61)[ip: (9.37), ipnet: 203.23.236.0/24(4.69), asn: 18390(3.96), country: AU(0.01)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[77.236.23.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:18390, ipnet:203.23.236.0/24, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 19:14:59 -0000 On 2020-03-10 01:04, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Take a look at r334530. "or the user really hates this feature and can't wait to turn it off" Excellently explained by Bruce as usual: "Revision 314641 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] Modified Sat Mar 4 06:19:12 2017 UTC (3 years ago) by bde File length: 107771 byte(s) Diff to previous 312910 Colorize syscons kernel console output according to a table indexed by the CPU number. This was originally for debugging near-deadlock conditions where multiple CPUs either deadlock or scramble each other's output trying to report the problem, but I found it interesting and sometimes useful for ordinary kernel messages.  Ordinary kernel messages shouldn't be interleaved, but if they are then the colorization makes them readable even if the interleaving is for every character (provided the CPU printing each message doesn't change). The default colors are 8-15 starting at 15 (bright white on black) for CPU 0 and repeating every 8 CPUs.  This works best with 8 CPUs. Non-bright colors and nonzero background colors need special configuration to avoid unreadable and ugly combinations so are not configured by default.  The next bright color after 15 is 8 (bright black = dark gray) is not very readable but is the only other color used with 2 CPUs.  After that the next bright color is 9 (bright blue) which is not much brighter than bright black, but is used with 3+ CPUs.  Other bright colors are brighter. Colorization is configured by default so that it gets tested.  It can only be turned off by configuring SC_KERNEL_CONS_ATTR to anything other than FG_WHITE.  After booting, all colors can be changed using the syscons.kattr sysctl.  This is a SYSCTL_OPAQUE, and no utility is provided to change it (sysctl only displays it). The default colors work in all VGA modes that I could test.  In 2-color graphics modes, all 8 bright colors are displayed as bright white, so the colorization has no effect, but anything with a nonzero background gives white on white unless the foreground is zero.  I don't have an mono or VGA grayscale hardware to test on.  Support for mono mode seems to have never worked right in syscons (I think bright white gives white underline with either bold or bright), but VGA grayscale should work better than 2-color graphics." RIP https://photos.app.goo.gl/YiVmFtWiK8Niy3Fw6 -andyf From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 22:56:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D49426F3FF; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48btrf2GcZz45St; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1129) id 297AA2736C; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-08 Message-ID: <20200309225650.GB46059@freefall.freebsd.org> Reply-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:56:50 -0000 (Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-08 =================================== Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2020-03-02 to 2020-03-08. During this period, we have: * 2239 builds (48.2% (-39.2) passed, 51.8 (+39.2) failed) of buildworld and buildkernel (GENERIC and LINT) were executed on aarch64, amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 120 test runs (87.5% (+10.0) passed, 4.2% (-17.3) unstable, 8.3% (+7.3) exception) were executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 29 doc and www builds (82.8% (-11.3) passed, 17.2% (+11.3) failed) Test case status (on 2020-03-08 23:59): | Branch/Architecture | Total | Pass | Fail | Skipped | | ------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | ------ | ------- | | head/amd64 | 7709 (+10) | 7617 (+19) | 0 (-9) | 92 (0) | | head/i386 | 7707 (+10) | 7609 (+19) | 0 (-9) | 98 (0) | | 12-STABLE/amd64 | 7501 (0) | 7452 (0) | 0 (0) | 49 (0) | | 12-STABLE/i386 | 7499 (0) | 7442 (0) | 0 (0) | 57 (0) | | 11-STABLE/amd64 | 6878 (0) | 6831 (+3) | 0 (0) | 47 (-3) | | 11-STABLE/i386 | 6876 (0) | 6824 (-3) | 0 (0) | 52 (+3) | (The statistics from experimental jobs are omitted) If any of the issues found by CI are in your area of interest or expertise please investigate the PRs listed below. The latest web version of this report is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/report-20200308 and archive is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/ , any help is welcome. ## Failing jobs * Most of the build was failed due to pkg repository ABI mismatching. (Fixed) For more details: https://bugs.freebsd.org/244549 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-mips64-build This job is using devel/gcc6@mips64 port (mips64-gcc6 pacakge) ``` ===> include/rpcsvc (includes) RPCGEN_CPP=/usr/local/bin/mips64-unknown-freebsd12.0-cpp6\ --sysroot=/usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-obj-gcc6/usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/mips.mips64/tmp\ -B/usr/local/mips64-unknown-freebsd12.0/bin/ rpcgen -C -h -DWANT_NFS3 /usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/include/rpcsvc/mount.x -o mount.h /usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/include/rpcsvc/mount.x:1:0: error: '-march=mips1' is not compatible with the selected ABI /*- *** [mount.h] Error code 1 make[4]: stopped in /usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/include/rpcsvc 1 error ``` * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc6_build/ ``` --- all_subdir_usr.bin/clang/lldb --- /usr/local/bin/x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1-ld: /tmp/obj/workspace/src/amd64.amd64/lib/clang/liblldb/liblldb.a(IOHandler.o): in function `curses::Window::Box(unsigned int, unsigned int)': /workspace/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:926: undefined reference to `box' /usr/local/bin/x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1-ld: /workspace/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:926: undefined reference to `box' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status ``` * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test Usually panics when executing sys.netpfil.pf.nat.exhaust For more details: https://bugs.freebsd.org/244703 ## Regressions * fusefs tests fail when mac_bsdextended.ko is loaded https://bugs.freebsd.org/244229 * `dtrace -c` causes program dumps core after somewhere between (r357694, r357701] https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * Lock-order reversals triggered by tests under sys.net.if_lagg_test.* on i386 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress panics i386 kernel https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * (test case) sys.geom.class.multipath.misc.fail_on_error (on 12-STABLE) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244158 ## Failing and Flaky tests (from experimental jobs) * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-dtrace_test/ * cddl.usr.sbin.dtrace.common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/ * There are ~13 failing and ~109 skipped cases, including flakey ones, see https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ for more details * Work for cleaning these failing cass are in progress * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_ltp/ * Total 3670 tests (0), 2285 success (-5), 579 failures (+5), 806 skipped (0) ## Disabled Tests * sys.fs.tmpfs.mount_test.large https://bugs.freebsd.org/212862 * sys.fs.tmpfs.link_test.kqueue https://bugs.freebsd.org/213662 * sys.kqueue.libkqueue.kqueue_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/233586 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__PT_KILL_competing_stop https://bugs.freebsd.org/220841 * lib.libc.regex.exhaust_test.regcomp_too_big (i386 only) https://bugs.freebsd.org/237450 * sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 * sys.netpfil.pf.names.names * sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 * lib.libc.gen.getmntinfo_test.getmntinfo_test https://bugs.freebsd.org/240049 * sys.sys.qmath_test.qdivq_s64q https://bugs.freebsd.org/240219 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__getppid https://bugs.freebsd.org/240510 * lib.libc.sys.stat_test.stat_socket https://bugs.freebsd.org/240621 * lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_write_filter_zstd https://bugs.freebsd.org/240683 * lib.libcasper.services.cap_dns.dns_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/241435 * local.kyua.* (31 cases) & local.lutok.* (3 cases) on 11-i386 https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-11-i386-test/2278/testReport/ * sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/242689 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__procdesc_reparent_wait_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/243605 * skip sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_wait_after_attach https://bugs.freebsd.org/244055 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_exits_before_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/244056 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.witness (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 * PipePdfork.WildcardWait in sys.capsicum.capsicum-test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/244165 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 * sys.netinet6.frag6.frag6_07.frag6_07 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244170 * sys.netinet.fibs_test.udp_dontroute6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244172 ## Issues ### Cause build fails * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233735 Possible build race: genoffset.o /usr/src/sys/sys/types.h: error: machine/endian.h: No such file or directory * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233769 Possible build race: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s ### Cause kernel panics * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 sys.netpfil.pf.names.names and sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy cause panic Patch exists: * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20868 * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20869 ### Open * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237403 Tests in sys/opencrypto should be converted to Python3 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 Flakey test case: common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237656 "Freed UMA keg (rtentry) was not empty (18 items). Lost 1 pages of memory." seen when running sys/netipsec tests * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero does not work when mac_portacl(4) loaded * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/241662 Flakey test case: lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_fuzz_iso9660 ### Others * [Tickets related to testing@](https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9maauwg) From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 12:41:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC64262882 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cF8N64jsz4b0Q for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id f3so12525683qkh.1 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vL7aQLCqpBGnQepopRVGsw5oDgDRo1Wibja6aE/ugFI=; b=Cd0sGB6nHTcmHraRusDZSFV4N5vyKln91mGQHgn6jOtv+uAKp/JfpN+o5kdGrcnub3 ixuchtQl9Pd5PO8dEhaW/vLQ88PJm8nQhPhxuelsbZOceLawoOrzqBJRzkXBlyYzQp2L d/uyb7sJGxMn7lKXhzg12EXqS1kYDfQjqIPRcIqz9uFXYIlpwHpg8QYGd4Gv8XLyZGaI 9zqgA4+8UUT+bnE4jq2wNp/nXCLQjfayQZVbgAmA8xP88tXv3XHkZMa8XfDsj6E3ObjA NZgfky8QO7XChmiaml4HuYpk4teKji8IV9Qty/ePANYJCbpb49zrx1cG97ICxoItMh4M Htkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vL7aQLCqpBGnQepopRVGsw5oDgDRo1Wibja6aE/ugFI=; b=m6uDb5loz13esQLXZf2e0BvQS4fp9fXicCsr0WTikBiGSR0JFcSVnriSZngl74I1HI 6Gn8FMYhSnDJnhuVYGN2mjM+Jw+kOfJd2ni0VV68oyPvc9CkNBb0q8R6gFjn1szQ/nsA l+7L++IQodMl4Pai0fyykuCVqbo8hCnq2Z/zkuqS0r/QJUejof5rGu64wYxgFp4w6JJi zrVws+jV2kXVkjgyJvCGNMmT+rcprtUPvSx2VjiNq9/boN8H1uJgRKO4220QS5sS55G9 dGThNzUdCntbPqQ6MfhVMPl6x8d+FfZCactKcHvWM5fkdOtzzc1s8S6cQo0zL2cQGvxI wDvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3HoN1ylOCYTfbkvIiinw9epcmETZti1EFP/+JajCK8k/aP8G38 +0Iuq+r8Dihs0i0ekdwFa7Ni0Frj/l6zLHLSlKwUnA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu5m1WGnbS5Nlb6O/k5IhQkBt0SzigaQhySEH0pc9QmTT4/hWuXPjwZ6taH+6HWIQBJnLElukzuAfFit0+Ho08= X-Received: by 2002:a37:546:: with SMTP id 67mr18753029qkf.272.1583844098089; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:41:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mario Olofo Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:41:27 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: FreeBSD Stable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cF8N64jsz4b0Q X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Cd0sGB6n; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marioolofo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::732 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marioolofo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.32), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.3.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:41:43 -0000 Hello All, In the prccess of making the FreeBSD my main OS, I stumbled on an very uncommon problem: the LightDM don't accept any keys, and I can't even get out to the tty with ctrl+alt+F1... I build the drm-kmod from ports, installed Xorg, Xfce4 and LightDM and lightdm-gtk-greeter with pkg, and enabled it on rc.conf with lightdm_enable="YES". On boot, it don't work because the lightdm need to be on video group, so I added it to video groups and then the LightDM screen showed up, but only the mouse work. If I press a lot of keys and then use the mouse to restart the system, I can see some garbage input on the first terminal! I didn't create a custom X config, but tried to force a input conf to see if it was the problem but it appears that the config is not used at all when starting LightDM. I rebuild from source the LightDM, but the problem persists. When I use startx to go directly to Xfce4 works like a charm. Then comes the second but less important problem that I found, the topbar decorator of windows are not displaying correctly. The background img behind the title don't stretch to cover the full width. Anyone had this problem before? Thank you, Mario From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 15:02:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5716D26661B for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (vogon.madpilot.net [159.69.1.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cJHQ1xvGz40n1 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cJHG0Lhfz6dW5; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:02:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rG2Z7BRKuFG3; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:02:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: Mario Olofo , FreeBSD Stable References: From: Guido Falsi Autocrypt: addr=mad@madpilot.net; keydata= mQENBE+G+l0BCADi/WBQ0aRJfnE7LBPsM0G3m/m3Yx7OPu4iYFvS84xawmRHtCNjWIntsxuX fptkmEo3Rsw816WUrek8dxoUAYdHd+EcpBcnnDzfDH5LW/TZ4gbrFezrHPdRp7wdxi23GN80 qPwHEwXuF0X4Wy5V0OO8B6VT/nA0ADYnBDhXS52HGIJ/GCUjgqJn+phDTdCFLvrSFdmgx4Wl c0W5Z1p5cmDF9l8L/hc959AeyNf7I9dXnjekGM9gVv7UDUYzCifR3U8T0fnfdMmS8NeI9NC+ wuREpRO4lKOkTnj9TtQJRiptlhcHQiAlG1cFqs7EQo57Tqq6cxD1FycZJLuC32bGbgalABEB AAG0Hkd1aWRvIEZhbHNpIDxtYWRAbWFkcGlsb3QubmV0PokBOQQTAQgAIwIbAwIeAQIXgAUL CQgHAwUVCgkICwQWAgMBBQJS79AgAhkBAAoJEBrmhg5Wy9KTc0kH/RO64ORBlTbTHaUaOj8F Je5O5NU2Pt9Cyt5ZWBRvxntr1zPTJGKRPS9ihlIfqT4ZvEngQGp57EUyFbCpI0UWasTerImM tt5WACnGmCzUTB39UXx8Oy4b1EgWeTJQ747e/F1mQLXTNa6ijRBE9fYlTb4gAkPN88/wVV9v 3PZozKLTg16ghBzHM/P7Lk8L7clPEZChX1FTa/6eSt3nvzfCuTMZbBPJF/ph+q1KyPqRgVfh tyhu5dvgMoPz/ni41IfeSrkJTD5RXzdyGR9q4Z1NYeBsLkRjC4LxKAP5KqUsvlOUjKvO1byj ApYdMarol+IGkaSk9e3zVYAJkWKjn/ni8Xa5Ag0EUxB7QQEQAKFhrDceoPdK/IHDSmoj6SQY isvM7VdhcleS7E9DoEAVt7yMbf6HbbMVTTY6ckvwTWQssywLBXNVqxgc4WLJjzfUhgef+WE7 5M3+WFYlOVQLGZY/zEVgma1raYnOHNAOzeHLDmEXjbZP6vGAeDyBbGfQPpE7qGYZ7ubeT3Xw QO+PklcCrvOPj2ZPcAxGNS2xVU/LzONqCrJqLMJSIcCdsbiSP4G5PnDFHtMokaTY6OEr8OEQ fOAerhcHUa/z7Uu8YtmaqKH+QGkE/WEgaRqSiTnv0JOTD+DxehaqvoKPPZ++2NpCZMHB2i6A /xifmQwEiIjEXtcueBRzkNUQkxhqZyS13SrhocL9ydtaVPBzZatAEjUDDEJmAMLVFs45qfyh MiNapHJo2n3MW/E5omqCvEkDdWX/en3P7CK2TemeaDghMsgkNKax/z0wNo5UZCkOPOz0xpNi UilOVbkuezZZNg65741qee2lfXhQIaZ66yT7hphc/N/z3PIAtLeze4u1VR2EXAuZ2sWAdlKC NTlJMsaU/x70BV11Wd/ypnVzM68dfdQIIAj1iMFAD/lXGlEUmKXg5Ov2VQDlTntQoanCYrAg +8CttPzjrydgLZFq3hrtQmfc0se5yv1WHS69+BsUOG09RvvawUDZxUjW19kyeN9THaNRgow3 kSuArUp6zSmJABEBAAGJAR8EGAEIAAkFAlMQe0ECGwwACgkQGuaGDlbL0pMN5wgA4bCkX/qw EVC06ToeR6C2putmSWQMgpDaqrv65Hubo+QGmg2P4ewTYQQ4g6oYWS03qHxqVVWhKz7FjfrV +dH8qbCLfSgIcvdBha7ayGZVrsiuMLKGbw36fcmkZPpSDOfHcP0XH8Z+u9CWj0xUkTxAlZ/7 i6gYSUpG2JWNtdmE/X8VVEyXusCLwy0K0BI60A/4dRTIX3C4QKrJ3ZbUXegz70ynjHf+lQMZ 9IZKASoRMuS5FozPQh6abvmwZEPdf5I9riUElzvHrqJ8Bx0t3Pujdoth+yNHpnBxrtO8LkQd rQ58P0SwcaIX33T2U9pG8bhu5YVR88FQ8OQ0cEsPBpDncrkBDQRPhvpdAQgAsd6mrOq1GSZw lzRscNQa9W2WB/3Tj4ON4PL2e9B+hc9lT/ny2zB3agXu5wbsXTzwxgJpQT7hNHkCSckW98h3 HRjFfhZPNCgInuUGsjcNyVguQh+/47ckhph0s7U+6B4yNuIiqQZk4mo8WgCNj1YIihVmGWEs gDOwMaajbDYZ0r1/3GkKlYjOXeUuT/WgourrSR5oZJVNA/k4X2H7M3JUr1BSc32L7BJt8M7A ntul6k17J0L8GmkvLvTUtQTO+p+DYQMna2ngD3PbAvQRcbEGnkg9ABrdEF0Wp4Gx+gGGWsyF KlHvPdMtgWAy3JsS+rQapG6LoW3yUJpwpEpA86KdBwARAQABiQEfBCgBCAAJBQJTEH0NAh0B AAoJEBrmhg5Wy9KTMZcIAMSsidGF4KpjGcKzhkNK0sEpevcelQ6DzgT7kcXuq6LQ6YOrbof2 /KPgGie9/ToFZfJXH8zE5GefqkKvHZbYssWilFvkI90F9n138kG205NB/2zlaQb74/v9ZMXJ XcipnIx+T2tOMCBgHJU41IMJmB+NfRt5A6CDytJdhWxqppsEo5jjy/7tJM1Nn47G87tAV8qV NUtzbS6zdnbHB4W2BJwCObbVv8epL3hu/L5efV2j2tSbVTmyvK/ClYMBqdtUo3uPX75GF/Ku YDCOP1BTA5zzmzp4PMVd+gmHcMgCZKY6lvcEtdi5FLI0we2kcY8ffPvM2d6MNhFsGLaVI95J 0oqJAR8EGAECAAkFAk+G+l0CGwwACgkQGuaGDlbL0pM18Qf9HTNNhu8N0ISKtmR8lgPhJuu8 9rOEa8KKEatr4fQ7gL+hmYOEqZ/yHLcPQvGxbAlLR7F0SheKvAEk4B1aFwGULPo0SzuO0d/W tVMEbGa95JTm/6mfiymWMlWf8UifD1MDKzzPR7Om0ybeoPM8S/RQTboUU1WLpwd4mg9pVJlK 0xr55GOSHNf4m7S+P1kvl3xgmEj14zVMq9yJBNWFlsQK5ciifh7sFpfuxWdEVbtgIdxpzImK LXSLA0vOroKAvxFTGBrBq3vxV6eUmaKyd5HbbWejmafY1ua5dcnew9lxpWKLdqkC27Vt0Cku +LtTY3325V+BChncwNcJJS7IMmBz6w== Message-ID: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:02:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cJHQ1xvGz40n1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[madpilot.net:s=bjowvop61wgh]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[madpilot.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[madpilot.net,quarantine]; IP_SCORE(-1.98)[ip: (-8.58), ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(0.24), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:02:59 -0000 On 10/03/20 13:41, Mario Olofo wrote: > Hello All, > In the prccess of making the FreeBSD my main OS, I stumbled on an very > uncommon problem: the LightDM don't accept any keys, and I can't even get > out to the tty with ctrl+alt+F1... > > I build the drm-kmod from ports, installed Xorg, Xfce4 and LightDM and > lightdm-gtk-greeter with pkg, and enabled it on rc.conf with > lightdm_enable="YES". > On boot, it don't work because the lightdm need to be on video group, so I > added it to video groups and then the LightDM screen showed up, but only > the mouse work. If I press a lot of keys and then use the mouse to restart > the system, I can see some garbage input on the first terminal! > I didn't create a custom X config, but tried to force a input conf to see > if it was the problem but it appears that the config is not used at all > when starting LightDM. I rebuild from source the LightDM, but the problem > persists. When I use startx to go directly to Xfce4 works like a charm. > I'm sorry I don't have much insight about this, but this one (and the following problem too) looks like a graphics hardware related problem. You should share some information about your system, which graphics adapter and chipset you are using and what driver setup. > Then comes the second but less important problem that I found, the topbar > decorator of windows are not displaying correctly. The background img > behind the title don't stretch to cover the full width. Anyone had this > problem before? There is a known problem with xfce 4.14 and window decorations on certain hardware chipsets: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240887 It has been recently reported that Xorg server 1.20.7 (available with the latest package set) fixes the issue. This update will reach quarterly packages at the start of April. If you're willing you could migrate your machine to latest packages and confirm if this fixes the issue for you. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 16:19:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93944268EFE; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com [209.85.166.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cL020xZNz4dch; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id h8so13382197iob.2; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:19:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZBG0zlODAjudCBJ4zWttC4hTFTcUDINoeWvFpMS4R+Y=; b=V0sWIhZtciLHCEYGe0jr4L67G3T4B019kPLc/Zcur//KgYx89JyEruncB7Xp1KyuWL tuKnYEWsNJbb04pifwq5K5IfXiSGFLkqCGow2ihXFyEu/lnWbnBmXhU64keWamPCpmPu w1hDdCM7kDh6ka3QuNhUSbNJJ+SFx/YQ2FFazZ/csTfBIfw03lydihxRK6ZU+mOzXut1 L8zdtQfBGZz+L8EGHnotE6GspYFuWlmKubsWTYaVXT7SVp+DFUCJDvDjPzuCTD2toSoH OrnqRv2hXkUiY3MDgjwbMfzpfJx3Urei8J4ePz1+lKqjf7SIAnK46WcTcQOUBPFcKAif dTeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0ZerhLnU+1FnQy2epithB9yCjUR5o2I7DOOC/hJjV/SsJY/nvS ayqa6HzrLKJFdHI/SCbCLbH/ZTsk+H3P0cwCUEdQwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv5s7ASPU3K/Fl/C+GPgIiQ78Q2Lt3UqnNYeAFoM9Xb9xQTDy56oIyDuzouQNPCnEE3+lazMWyX7+ZHADFJ+Z4= X-Received: by 2002:a02:3808:: with SMTP id b8mr3319017jaa.136.1583857184235; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200309150432.GR98340@kib.kiev.ua> <8df70772-faee-bd07-612f-696e8a1d477c@andyit.com.au> In-Reply-To: <8df70772-faee-bd07-612f-696e8a1d477c@andyit.com.au> From: Ed Maste Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:19:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] To: Andy Farkas Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cL020xZNz4dch X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.44 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[53.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.44)[ip: (-2.53), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.98), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[53.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:19:47 -0000 On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 15:15, Andy Farkas wrote: > > On 2020-03-10 01:04, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Take a look at r334530. > > "or the user really hates this feature and can't wait to turn it off" So to confirm, your issue is with sc(4), not vt(4)? From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 20:06:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC3126EF82 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cR1S4WdSz3QS3 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBl8m-0004fc-La; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:06:12 -0600 Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.66]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jBl8k-00064i-HW; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:06:12 -0600 Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6618060018D; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:06:10 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EDA60010C; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:06:10 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta2.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta2.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 70l39SHoaVBW; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:06:10 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [172.20.20.20] (unknown [73.98.170.51]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3D1D6000D3; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:06:09 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Rebecca Cran Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:06:09 -0600 Cc: Mario Olofo , Mark Linimon , FreeBSD Stable , Karl Denninger To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50) X-XM-SPF: eid=1jBl8k-00064i-HW; ; ; mid=; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.66; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.66 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4960] * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Warner Losh X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1541 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 7 (0.4%), b_tie_ro: 6 (0.4%), parse: 0.86 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (0.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.11 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.6 (0.2%), tests_pri_-950: 1.31 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 0.97 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 21 (1.3%), check_bayes: 19 (1.2%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.4%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (0.4%), b_comp_prob: 2.2 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.0 (0.2%), b_finish: 0.66 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 709 (46.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.51 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.3 (0.2%), poll_dns_idle: 765 (49.7%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 781 (50.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: Running FreeBSD on M.2 SSD X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cR1S4WdSz3QS3 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.62 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[231.13.70.166.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[51.170.98.73.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[231.13.70.166.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.89)[0.894,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.26)[0.262,0]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (-1.60), ipnet: 166.70.0.0/16(1.93), asn: 6315(1.54), country: US(-0.05)]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:06:21 -0000 >> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:20 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> =EF=BB=BFOn Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 8:54 PM Mario Olofo wrote: >>=20 >> Hello Mark, >> Yes, I think that it's related to the WD Green SSD. >> Today I found this bug on FreeBSD's bugzilla: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225666 >> Tried to reinstall and recompile the kernel with the patch but it didn't >> work, I continue to see corrupted data. >> I think that the only way to be really sure about the corrupted data is t= o >> reinstall again but already boot with the quirks configured, but the >> kern.cam.ada.X.quirks don't seems to exists on FreeBSD 12, >> so I have a probability of corruption between installation and compilatio= n >> of the patched kernel... >> Don't know what more to do... >=20 > What happens if you disable TRIM? Also, have you checked to see if there=E2=80=99s a firmware update available= ? Rebecca= From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 20:27:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8CC26F6EB for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x743.google.com (mail-qk1-x743.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::743]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cRTS1x93z4mZT for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x743.google.com with SMTP id d8so9690436qka.2 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:27:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4VQTvsdL9HHPwi1oxVdBFr+rGyJ/lNOdHXtg0N172n4=; b=TMi2cCnZmIRkMV3MPY7lHFHvHuxAs3MpxH//LlUdwUW+26iPmFxpmfuz1KsO8G1XS/ wIwMO2jvvvYii7YgBDIg0oD5PK1CwA8v2dBAAPp5Y4yqragraW5mQ/EW69CB7mHvLG1n xcyMo9P6l9o1dUjngErZYLW8Ay+iTgU1MA0QcTaoKRk0pKlm8pxlMdG0rBXweiUBFcbj 2QHII1PnzIgB5RsoN6ly/oxyAxgroVD5k9DkruyjFP7uew9BHfNE58mpQjXFUiXcsv3l HU+fZ8ocfkupwr9tZ1rdSQf4r7TAHNBHmoyJ6JXbKzxvT16gTDkYeO9fc7NEQRT0Z6sl 9Frg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4VQTvsdL9HHPwi1oxVdBFr+rGyJ/lNOdHXtg0N172n4=; b=guuhSy+DGjySJ2K/6q0+gvj8COJfYFBVGcQKa6U6ZABN4V8rHbGcq7M+oVCFMHU4u1 ztwIMqc8sHmdgTwQ7SMXWhtGbiBLeORx9gPz4Slrudhsu/icqq+8LyoV64wDRe51iFwT Mm+vjspdcmZfV1s9wpOaZg9Qm4aJD5xmUvav7GlCF7nmhfcfJVNaaMrUySutlH+bccSV N+55h3uyF3Xht/rnrcJka+SdrwDkxu4nvH7jhlhhbwdYSkYCze/x4mFUQbRhgSAAKvm1 Sh70iMMovRZ63UINgztNd1EMPzb8wSx8hYPnu5vzxL5nvQV7I4TktZW3TFPY57huTsvN hOEw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0pAzZPf509OKZDiuF0byd0tOFd69aU4u8ojbwbh54t5oxoOZnV iqlRx7tJ7BqpIhdGmxuTkI1aZPENXXN98+tqTGw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsWZjy6nF2GOqoHrG8/sHgZ68IuVHuhqqgXBBguXFqyMB8Q+SH8N8sktRV080TwCdxHtxncijPnBg3KRU4kzdg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:522:: with SMTP id h2mr21206689qkh.260.1583872027517; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:27:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mario Olofo Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:26:56 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running FreeBSD on M.2 SSD To: Rebecca Cran Cc: Warner Losh , Mark Linimon , FreeBSD Stable , Karl Denninger X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cRTS1x93z4mZT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TMi2cCnZ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marioolofo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::743 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marioolofo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (1.73), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.4.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:27:10 -0000 Hi Rebecca, I checked when I had the problem but the machine was up to date. I already solved this problem with the fix in the bugzilla and a lot of help from the great people here to try to narrow down the problem, but the little detail is that the installer wasn't using the ZFS volumes as 4k. So before the setup for partitions I entered the command line, loaded the ZFS driver and added the ashift=3D12 sysctl to it, so it installed the volumes as 4k, and after that I rebuilt the kernel with the patch (quirks =3D 0x03) =3D) Thank you, Mario Em ter., 10 de mar. de 2020 =C3=A0s 17:06, Rebecca Cran escreveu: > > >> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:20 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >> =EF=BB=BFOn Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 8:54 PM Mario Olofo > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Mark, > >> Yes, I think that it's related to the WD Green SSD. > >> Today I found this bug on FreeBSD's bugzilla: > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225666 > >> Tried to reinstall and recompile the kernel with the patch but it didn= 't > >> work, I continue to see corrupted data. > >> I think that the only way to be really sure about the corrupted data i= s > to > >> reinstall again but already boot with the quirks configured, but the > >> kern.cam.ada.X.quirks don't seems to exists on FreeBSD 12, > >> so I have a probability of corruption between installation and > compilation > >> of the patched kernel... > >> Don't know what more to do... > > > > What happens if you disable TRIM? > > Also, have you checked to see if there=E2=80=99s a firmware update availa= ble? > > Rebecca > > From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 23:15:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E313327307F; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from alpine.spintel.net.au (alpine-smtp.spintel.net.au [203.29.125.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cWCk5ws2z42HK; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Received: from drunkfish.andyit.com.au (210-1-210-40-cpe.spintel.net.au [210.1.210.40]) by alpine.spintel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298F54C043E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:15:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mater.andyit.com.au (mater.andyit.com.au [172.22.2.22]) by drunkfish.andyit.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02ANFL3O035776 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:15:22 +1000 (AEST) (envelope-from andyf@andyit.com.au) Subject: Re: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] To: Ed Maste Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable stable References: <20200309150432.GR98340@kib.kiev.ua> <8df70772-faee-bd07-612f-696e8a1d477c@andyit.com.au> From: Andy Farkas Message-ID: <62e5199c-033b-f802-308a-98a22f80fc36@andyit.com.au> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:15:21 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-AU X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cWCk5ws2z42HK X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.02 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.981,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:15:32 -0000 On 2020-03-11 02:19, Ed Maste wrote: > So to confirm, your issue is with sc(4), not vt(4)? I don't actually have an issue with either. although: "After booting, all colors can be changed using the syscons.kattr sysctl." % sysctl -a | grep syscons hw.syscons.sc_no_suspend_vtswitch: 0 hw.syscons.kbd_debug: 1 hw.syscons.kbd_reboot: 1 hw.syscons.bell: 1 hw.syscons.saver.keybonly: 0 % Also, both sc and vt are compiled into GENERIC. Is it just a matter of putting "syscons=[sc|vt]" in loader.conf to select whatever driver? FreeBSD drunkfish.andyit.com.au 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE #1 r358253: Sun Feb 23 15:02:00 AEST 2020 -andyf From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 01:05:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59A0275CA7 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from lax.lemis.com (www.lemis.com [45.32.70.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cYfK5nNlz4dfm for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from eureka.lemis.com (aussie-gw.lemis.com [167.179.139.35]) by lax.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97497280DE for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eureka.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E206C263595; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:05:11 +1100 (AEDT) Resent-From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:05:11 +1100 Resent-Message-ID: <20200311010511.GD89512@eureka.lemis.com> Resent-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Original-To: grog@lemis.com Delivered-To: grog@lemis.com Received: from lax.lemis.com (www.lemis.com [45.32.70.18]) by eureka.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61CB263592 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:47:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [96.47.72.81]) by lax.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2C8280DE for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [96.47.72.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51D68AD32 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cYFG2nD6z44ZV for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 471401768E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: grog@localmail.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [96.47.72.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4178C17625; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cYFF5DW9z44Yh; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821E3275635; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from lax.lemis.com (www.lemis.com [45.32.70.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cYF008dFz446M; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from eureka.lemis.com (aussie-gw.lemis.com [167.179.139.35]) by lax.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9502809E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eureka.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id A6BA8263595; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:46:35 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:46:35 +1100 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-3-5309-0418 Mobile: +61-490-494-038. Use only as instructed. WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list Errors-To: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cYfK5nNlz4dfm X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grog@lemis.com designates 45.32.70.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grog@lemis.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:www.lemis.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.55)[ip: (-8.09), ipnet: 45.32.64.0/19(-2.74), asn: 20473(-1.84), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:45.32.64.0/19, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[11] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:05:15 -0000 --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 0:20:03 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [originally sent to current@] > I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > the key-codes Xorg sees changed. Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-mar2020.php?topics=c&subtitle=Daily%20teevee%20update&article=D-20200306-002910#D-20200306-002910 , not the first entry on the subject. > I have the right Alt key mapped to "Multi_key", which is now > keycode 108 instead of 113, which is now arrow left instead. Interesting. Mine wandered from 117 to 147, with PageDown ("Next") as collateral damage. It seems that there are a lot of strange new key bindings (partial output of xmodmap -pk): 117 0xff56 (Next) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff56 (Next) 130 0xff31 (Hangul) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff31 (Hangul) 131 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) 135 0xff67 (Menu) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff67 (Menu) 147 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) Some of these may reflect other remappings that I have done. > I hope this email saves somebody else from the frustrating > morning I had... Sorry. I should have thought of reporting it. For me, with a number of other issues, it was a frustrating week,some of which are still not resolved. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAl5oNOsACgkQIubykFB6QiP79wCfbHCkyNiwyZm6lqXCZo5tml1Z EQ8An0s7ArllC+6etMGrFaQnchzFe2+4 =Y8jz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a-- From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 01:21:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4794276120 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x841.google.com (mail-qt1-x841.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::841]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cZ0b09RSz43l8 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x841.google.com with SMTP id l13so401891qtv.10 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:21:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/zOGE7dfzhu2a+5OwQib/AvWNdelVpytvxR+64nySWk=; b=cBIf/LsC8LXqFz9GzkG3SIJ3HOJiGxq0pVytCWYCEli6xINdJADhEbRKRCxINJI27A NHGl8CuL4Izy8NqN2Jt/TFolpbfEkMBiysmb2MZzrIUxb8Qe+peXiu8MPdwTupwxtrFM 0QZ/dJ+Fp57ZkEiGkyMYSinUUKGzZdifs/JiLIE6t3hItxEOM9RB+iRuG8Tq8XgGcPd8 GNdXuawptNEyd4wEO0ZxCvSsZdYl75Cp/l130zOG8lrvodetDuLohUWlpzWThDYq9x9B 3mFHgk4aSMPsIqx55BrVn9QLxUWUojLKKJp0p+/zDiV2Lwl0Ieg+IGunE8OnuycwC65p RnRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/zOGE7dfzhu2a+5OwQib/AvWNdelVpytvxR+64nySWk=; b=Bxu0XNAzCXNSL5Vh2MQdhsuWpw2d0Bjqc8L2y9KHrxJ6GZ/hhBih92hU6qcVKin0ce tYUsIxVtp98kZUMMT95kNlEhUthAI/vDmXadhaWseTnkvlmTIXsZEgTP3mBS3/5rWRqq rG++BUjZrnqxwMaQUuITRYdmd40pisJb+eKB7exQGpjZ4Uq7exDGSl2s/j1XMEkhDM6B yu+b1PrjOLQmm9SswTZ8d0C2OtFobnQ7hpyqwfhksEjzgRjf4L+MJkjLaDj/Z8SiBkQB gj2M0vuYLX9FC6eulCwW35MEytbMcNC/qC0weuWA0nDxWFJSByxdyBSNn/ddv9/JM6dM UaXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3KlLMFb8jskGlB4tv+r2pjQxx8p3DnfmqFGCCew6ByASkXrFBe P2UgYUthSG0exz3iQ8z2jhisUNG+f/wwA2U10bY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuCN1N57fwdZoVCkAKFcR2mXT7XeNS6j/iIs23z1xcrgiJYpYsqm12ZbuTMITYkPruW1UV8LYTpcaf9er+Ob90= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1248:: with SMTP id g8mr626175qtj.390.1583889661744; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:21:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> From: Mario Olofo Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:20:50 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: Guido Falsi , Ulf Rudolf Cc: FreeBSD Stable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cZ0b09RSz43l8 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=cBIf/LsC; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marioolofo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::841 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marioolofo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (2.00), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.4.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:21:04 -0000 Hello, @Guido I tried to rebuild the xorg-server but it stoped to recognize all input devices even on Xfce4, I think I'm missing something. Tried to rebuild the xf86-input-evdev too but didn't work either. Had to revert to the pkg version to be able to send this email @Ulf Rudolf Now knowing that the xorg-server is not recognizing any input devices after rebuild the latest version, I have a feeling that this problem is related, maybe the LightDM expects some specific device? My system is a Dell G3 2019 with: 12.1-RELEASE-p2 Mesa DRI Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630 (Coffeelake 3x8 GT2) Pkgs: - Xorg 7.7_3 - xorg-server 1.18.4_13,1 (hal is off in the description) - xfce 4.14 Ports: - drm-kmod-g20190710 Thank you, Mario Em ter., 10 de mar. de 2020 =C3=A0s 12:02, Guido Falsi escreveu: > On 10/03/20 13:41, Mario Olofo wrote: > > Hello All, > > In the prccess of making the FreeBSD my main OS, I stumbled on an very > > uncommon problem: the LightDM don't accept any keys, and I can't even g= et > > out to the tty with ctrl+alt+F1... > > > > I build the drm-kmod from ports, installed Xorg, Xfce4 and LightDM and > > lightdm-gtk-greeter with pkg, and enabled it on rc.conf with > > lightdm_enable=3D"YES". > > On boot, it don't work because the lightdm need to be on video group, s= o > I > > added it to video groups and then the LightDM screen showed up, but onl= y > > the mouse work. If I press a lot of keys and then use the mouse to > restart > > the system, I can see some garbage input on the first terminal! > > I didn't create a custom X config, but tried to force a input conf to s= ee > > if it was the problem but it appears that the config is not used at all > > when starting LightDM. I rebuild from source the LightDM, but the probl= em > > persists. When I use startx to go directly to Xfce4 works like a charm. > > > > I'm sorry I don't have much insight about this, but this one (and the > following problem too) looks like a graphics hardware related problem. > > You should share some information about your system, which graphics > adapter and chipset you are using and what driver setup. > > > Then comes the second but less important problem that I found, the topb= ar > > decorator of windows are not displaying correctly. The background img > > behind the title don't stretch to cover the full width. Anyone had this > > problem before? > > There is a known problem with xfce 4.14 and window decorations on > certain hardware chipsets: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240887 > > It has been recently reported that Xorg server 1.20.7 (available with > the latest package set) fixes the issue. > > This update will reach quarterly packages at the start of April. If > you're willing you could migrate your machine to latest packages and > confirm if this fixes the issue for you. > > -- > Guido Falsi > From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:27:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D701625A82A; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmpD2L8yz4CG6; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si) Received: from amavis-ori.ijs.si (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmp558gszxh1; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ijs.si; h= user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to:organization :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:mime-version:received:received :received:received; s=jakla4; t=1583918858; x=1586510859; bh=A6b hXXjDl+K7/fjWiLiHu8t27drjiIf5vI7bVf0oOB0=; b=iWXaUTOa7pXXxyQA0A1 a1eVXM7tqn69YYBi0b5rrwEnmA2YNWGX34p/NR3q2Di7UgujhuT0Hl4M9/SR+O+r M/tyTTi0AMU288d8U4hYBDDmhrhlPyq23VVxHZkg50SlYD7ZTG17txn+Mz4wa17K HNhantrt5TO01UDNgKEC8LRw= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([IPv6:::1]) by amavis-ori.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id fxmqiBAExKfA; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mildred.ijs.si (mailbox.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::143:1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmp25sVBzxgv; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from nabiralnik.ijs.si (nabiralnik.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::80:16]) by mildred.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmp25bbTz15h; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from 2001:1470:ff80:e001:6d4:c4ff:fe4b:7c23 by nabiralnik.ijs.si with HTTP (HTTP/2.0 POST); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 From: Mark Martinec To: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Organization: Jozef Stefan Institute In-Reply-To: <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmpD2L8yz4CG6 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ijs.si header.s=jakla4 header.b=iWXaUTOa; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ijs.si; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Mark.Martinec@ijs.si designates 193.2.4.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Mark.Martinec@ijs.si X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ijs.si:s=jakla4]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:193.2.4.66]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[ijs.si.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.1]; IP_SCORE(-1.08)[ipnet: 193.2.0.0/16(-2.53), asn: 2107(-2.89), country: SI(0.01)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[66.4.2.193.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ijs.si:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ijs.si,none]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2107, ipnet:193.2.0.0/16, country:SI]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:27:50 -0000 >> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > > Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a frustration). https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:29:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBA125AB24; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmqr5d4fz4G61; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmqp11lFz3lwh; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id Rtsb7kT7AFhr; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:8ff:f59:bc1f:9dc8]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cmqm46r7z3lvf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:29:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmqr5d4fz4G61 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.05 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.961,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.910,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:13 -0000 On 2020-03-11 01:46, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 0:20:03 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > [originally sent to current@] >> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > > Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. See > http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-mar2020.php?topics=c&subtitle=Daily%20teevee%20update&article=D-20200306-002910#D-20200306-002910 > , not the first entry on the subject. > >> I have the right Alt key mapped to "Multi_key", which is now >> keycode 108 instead of 113, which is now arrow left instead. > > Interesting. Mine wandered from 117 to 147, with PageDown ("Next") as > collateral damage. It seems that there are a lot of strange new key > bindings (partial output of xmodmap -pk): > > 117 0xff56 (Next) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff56 (Next) > 130 0xff31 (Hangul) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff31 (Hangul) > 131 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) > 135 0xff67 (Menu) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff67 (Menu) > 147 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) > > Some of these may reflect other remappings that I have done. > >> I hope this email saves somebody else from the frustrating >> morning I had... > > Sorry. I should have thought of reporting it. For me, with a number > of other issues, it was a frustrating week,some of which are still not > resolved. > This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. I'm sorry that it has caused fallout, but it is something that needs to be done in order to keep up with upstream graphics stack, and to improve FreeBSD desktop support in general. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196678 has some discussions regarding input devices, as does the x11@ mailing list archives. Regards -- Niclas Zeising FreeBSD Graphics Team From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:31:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775CE25B07B; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2607:f740:d:20::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmth5pNlz4LnW; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmtY080Jz3lvf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id K05qpyXilQiZ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:8ff:f59:bc1f:9dc8]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cmtX45YZz3lcX; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes To: Mark Martinec , FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:31:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmth5pNlz4LnW X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.01 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.966,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:d::/48, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:41 -0000 On 2020-03-11 10:27, Mark Martinec wrote: >>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. >> >> Indeed.=C2=A0 This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on >> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. >=20 > And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a=20 > frustration). >=20 > =C2=A0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244354 >=20 And that PR has a suggested solution for at least KDE users. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:34:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A8A25B640; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmy64CTvz4T3R; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmy46w0rz3lvf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id PwYqxW_-P5Zo; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:8ff:f59:bc1f:9dc8]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cmy428Jpz3lcX; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes From: Niclas Zeising To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> Message-ID: <8dc42d72-3507-0b7e-274b-8955233dfdfc@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:34:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmy64CTvz4T3R X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.15 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.81)[0.813,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.958,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:38 -0000 On 2020-03-11 10:29, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2020-03-11 01:46, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> Sorry.=C2=A0 I should have thought of reporting it.=C2=A0 For me, with= a number >> of other issues, it was a frustrating week,some of which are still not >> resolved. As a side note, if it's not reported, it's very hard for us to be aware=20 of issues, and to help out in resolving them. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 14:42:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FB4262BB3; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-f196.google.com (mail-il1-f196.google.com [209.85.166.196]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cvmp3tQ2z4S9x; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-f196.google.com with SMTP id a6so2222206ilc.4; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:42:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RHA4ZAJPjOepibMF49WKRtirzkTzrJTlWn7VyTYuG74=; b=RYpiorLCR36I9tHTbj1L7IREUjWv5SpeE4HZ24Odchyj/GRF5sHllLGnUExCfV/z1b 6iN3TO1Q5mUIdUriqbxnA3dgxI9D3G5VdnftBJGT8cUgBSenv6jHwKdJO/w9hWSy3iw7 sYsqRlsrXnFRbDUiGup/Ub6E2cPtrtHSPCH7Vtox6PfclYVpc+KpVoFr3Nyoq8xRiiWp W7DUC+KXxaKE9eD3zDLfe8oSFvLdEr4ZDmsduXtIiuDH8EL+fbQ4iZK6ubZ08PlfO836 pVmIr2aq/q7UCe5Dqry1Zw8Z0xZCAwPKODUOoTSjZT88ddS9nKvkUAYPszqwcDClOKSr ptCA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2WzPHF5PfV2hn68Cf0H96x+3nLGAr8xZJEPsvJ66A/RvNutLs7 ncXuyNW7f8eMkXugJZoMrpsuKHM95W5zptPG1p01hQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuXSRwytmy2S5vxWN2lzXDkO6jlUACh1+pV+NMx47MiLnBzdU44L5DkkGSmrBroCtuZoXtkPxEPpXmZaWpFU8Y= X-Received: by 2002:a92:778e:: with SMTP id s136mr3501679ilc.256.1583937720812; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:42:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200309150432.GR98340@kib.kiev.ua> <8df70772-faee-bd07-612f-696e8a1d477c@andyit.com.au> <62e5199c-033b-f802-308a-98a22f80fc36@andyit.com.au> In-Reply-To: <62e5199c-033b-f802-308a-98a22f80fc36@andyit.com.au> From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:41:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vt [was: Re: [Bug 235564] INDEX.keymaps for vt contains "from-" keymaps but the files are missing] To: Andy Farkas Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cvmp3tQ2z4S9x X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.03 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[196.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.03)[ip: (-0.47), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.98), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[196.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:42:04 -0000 On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 19:15, Andy Farkas wrote: > > Is it just a matter of putting "syscons=[sc|vt]" in loader.conf > to select whatever driver? Have a look at sc(4) and vt(4) - in loader.conf: kern.vty=sc or kern.vty=vt And sysctl kern.vty will let you know which you're using. From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 15:24:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097AB263AAC for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (vogon.madpilot.net [159.69.1.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cwk670Lkz43Df for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cwjz2jzgz6dX5; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:24:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Wkl_bECrWSti; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:24:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: Mario Olofo , Ulf Rudolf Cc: FreeBSD Stable References: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> From: Guido Falsi Autocrypt: addr=mad@madpilot.net; keydata= mQENBE+G+l0BCADi/WBQ0aRJfnE7LBPsM0G3m/m3Yx7OPu4iYFvS84xawmRHtCNjWIntsxuX fptkmEo3Rsw816WUrek8dxoUAYdHd+EcpBcnnDzfDH5LW/TZ4gbrFezrHPdRp7wdxi23GN80 qPwHEwXuF0X4Wy5V0OO8B6VT/nA0ADYnBDhXS52HGIJ/GCUjgqJn+phDTdCFLvrSFdmgx4Wl c0W5Z1p5cmDF9l8L/hc959AeyNf7I9dXnjekGM9gVv7UDUYzCifR3U8T0fnfdMmS8NeI9NC+ wuREpRO4lKOkTnj9TtQJRiptlhcHQiAlG1cFqs7EQo57Tqq6cxD1FycZJLuC32bGbgalABEB AAG0Hkd1aWRvIEZhbHNpIDxtYWRAbWFkcGlsb3QubmV0PokBOQQTAQgAIwIbAwIeAQIXgAUL CQgHAwUVCgkICwQWAgMBBQJS79AgAhkBAAoJEBrmhg5Wy9KTc0kH/RO64ORBlTbTHaUaOj8F Je5O5NU2Pt9Cyt5ZWBRvxntr1zPTJGKRPS9ihlIfqT4ZvEngQGp57EUyFbCpI0UWasTerImM tt5WACnGmCzUTB39UXx8Oy4b1EgWeTJQ747e/F1mQLXTNa6ijRBE9fYlTb4gAkPN88/wVV9v 3PZozKLTg16ghBzHM/P7Lk8L7clPEZChX1FTa/6eSt3nvzfCuTMZbBPJF/ph+q1KyPqRgVfh tyhu5dvgMoPz/ni41IfeSrkJTD5RXzdyGR9q4Z1NYeBsLkRjC4LxKAP5KqUsvlOUjKvO1byj ApYdMarol+IGkaSk9e3zVYAJkWKjn/ni8Xa5Ag0EUxB7QQEQAKFhrDceoPdK/IHDSmoj6SQY isvM7VdhcleS7E9DoEAVt7yMbf6HbbMVTTY6ckvwTWQssywLBXNVqxgc4WLJjzfUhgef+WE7 5M3+WFYlOVQLGZY/zEVgma1raYnOHNAOzeHLDmEXjbZP6vGAeDyBbGfQPpE7qGYZ7ubeT3Xw QO+PklcCrvOPj2ZPcAxGNS2xVU/LzONqCrJqLMJSIcCdsbiSP4G5PnDFHtMokaTY6OEr8OEQ fOAerhcHUa/z7Uu8YtmaqKH+QGkE/WEgaRqSiTnv0JOTD+DxehaqvoKPPZ++2NpCZMHB2i6A /xifmQwEiIjEXtcueBRzkNUQkxhqZyS13SrhocL9ydtaVPBzZatAEjUDDEJmAMLVFs45qfyh MiNapHJo2n3MW/E5omqCvEkDdWX/en3P7CK2TemeaDghMsgkNKax/z0wNo5UZCkOPOz0xpNi UilOVbkuezZZNg65741qee2lfXhQIaZ66yT7hphc/N/z3PIAtLeze4u1VR2EXAuZ2sWAdlKC NTlJMsaU/x70BV11Wd/ypnVzM68dfdQIIAj1iMFAD/lXGlEUmKXg5Ov2VQDlTntQoanCYrAg +8CttPzjrydgLZFq3hrtQmfc0se5yv1WHS69+BsUOG09RvvawUDZxUjW19kyeN9THaNRgow3 kSuArUp6zSmJABEBAAGJAR8EGAEIAAkFAlMQe0ECGwwACgkQGuaGDlbL0pMN5wgA4bCkX/qw EVC06ToeR6C2putmSWQMgpDaqrv65Hubo+QGmg2P4ewTYQQ4g6oYWS03qHxqVVWhKz7FjfrV +dH8qbCLfSgIcvdBha7ayGZVrsiuMLKGbw36fcmkZPpSDOfHcP0XH8Z+u9CWj0xUkTxAlZ/7 i6gYSUpG2JWNtdmE/X8VVEyXusCLwy0K0BI60A/4dRTIX3C4QKrJ3ZbUXegz70ynjHf+lQMZ 9IZKASoRMuS5FozPQh6abvmwZEPdf5I9riUElzvHrqJ8Bx0t3Pujdoth+yNHpnBxrtO8LkQd rQ58P0SwcaIX33T2U9pG8bhu5YVR88FQ8OQ0cEsPBpDncrkBDQRPhvpdAQgAsd6mrOq1GSZw lzRscNQa9W2WB/3Tj4ON4PL2e9B+hc9lT/ny2zB3agXu5wbsXTzwxgJpQT7hNHkCSckW98h3 HRjFfhZPNCgInuUGsjcNyVguQh+/47ckhph0s7U+6B4yNuIiqQZk4mo8WgCNj1YIihVmGWEs gDOwMaajbDYZ0r1/3GkKlYjOXeUuT/WgourrSR5oZJVNA/k4X2H7M3JUr1BSc32L7BJt8M7A ntul6k17J0L8GmkvLvTUtQTO+p+DYQMna2ngD3PbAvQRcbEGnkg9ABrdEF0Wp4Gx+gGGWsyF KlHvPdMtgWAy3JsS+rQapG6LoW3yUJpwpEpA86KdBwARAQABiQEfBCgBCAAJBQJTEH0NAh0B AAoJEBrmhg5Wy9KTMZcIAMSsidGF4KpjGcKzhkNK0sEpevcelQ6DzgT7kcXuq6LQ6YOrbof2 /KPgGie9/ToFZfJXH8zE5GefqkKvHZbYssWilFvkI90F9n138kG205NB/2zlaQb74/v9ZMXJ XcipnIx+T2tOMCBgHJU41IMJmB+NfRt5A6CDytJdhWxqppsEo5jjy/7tJM1Nn47G87tAV8qV NUtzbS6zdnbHB4W2BJwCObbVv8epL3hu/L5efV2j2tSbVTmyvK/ClYMBqdtUo3uPX75GF/Ku YDCOP1BTA5zzmzp4PMVd+gmHcMgCZKY6lvcEtdi5FLI0we2kcY8ffPvM2d6MNhFsGLaVI95J 0oqJAR8EGAECAAkFAk+G+l0CGwwACgkQGuaGDlbL0pM18Qf9HTNNhu8N0ISKtmR8lgPhJuu8 9rOEa8KKEatr4fQ7gL+hmYOEqZ/yHLcPQvGxbAlLR7F0SheKvAEk4B1aFwGULPo0SzuO0d/W tVMEbGa95JTm/6mfiymWMlWf8UifD1MDKzzPR7Om0ybeoPM8S/RQTboUU1WLpwd4mg9pVJlK 0xr55GOSHNf4m7S+P1kvl3xgmEj14zVMq9yJBNWFlsQK5ciifh7sFpfuxWdEVbtgIdxpzImK LXSLA0vOroKAvxFTGBrBq3vxV6eUmaKyd5HbbWejmafY1ua5dcnew9lxpWKLdqkC27Vt0Cku +LtTY3325V+BChncwNcJJS7IMmBz6w== Message-ID: <2f5e9a03-a68d-401b-9c05-3c55c913a7b1@madpilot.net> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:24:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cwk670Lkz43Df X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[madpilot.net:s=bjowvop61wgh]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[madpilot.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[madpilot.net,quarantine]; IP_SCORE(-1.97)[ip: (-8.51), ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(0.24), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:24:49 -0000 On 11/03/20 02:20, Mario Olofo wrote: > Hello, > > @Guido > I tried to rebuild the xorg-server but it stoped to recognize all input > devices even on Xfce4, I think I'm missing something. > Tried to rebuild the xf86-input-evdev too but didn't work either. > Had to revert to the pkg version to be able to send this email Before these rebuilds were you using packages? from quarterly or latest? AFAIK mixing packages and locally built packages isn't really supported. I works most of the time, but there are no warranties. Also it is especially prone to breaking when building parts that work with hardware drivers. So to properly upgrade your Xorg server if you're coming from quarterly packages the safe way is to configure your machine to use latest packages and perform a pkg upgrade. In rare cases you could need pkg upgrade -f. If you want to use ports and have been using packages, only safe way is to reinstall everything from ports, but I'd really suggest you use project provided packages or build your own package set using a tool like poudriere. Apart from this, new Xorg changes many things and upgrading only the server will not be enough anyway. Unluckily if you don't perform a proper upgrade it's difficult to tell if the problem is caused by a bug in some port or induced by some misalignment on your system software. > > @Ulf Rudolf > Now knowing that the xorg-server is not recognizing any input devices > after rebuild the latest version, I have a feeling that this problem is > related, maybe the LightDM expects some specific device? LightDM uses Xorg for it's input, so, no it should work. Have you tried using "startx" as root to check that Xorg itself works fine? -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 15:50:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD852642E5 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cxHw2F4Tz4CXt for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id t13so1873996qtn.13 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:50:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C1UrtGj1NVvpRr17txyoa61KMNP12uXdXDQK7vfOpks=; b=L997grUOG4ibf1stbgVZ/2TQYFaCItsZjMyd/NY44N3fI/bcezdc5RLP5ktXWKw4qZ dVB8HAV2Sr/oJckKGeMbDQN28P51EhOI4U9Pt6YRiCmFAlVbYpoLK4Gvv8of5NmS/5bv vebeWbda/i+iKJTGSU0iUt8tuiBMA5gm7t71JtvBJWzBd5lvEpCAsGwqhDKuEkFcE6UE e67Qj83hTGnvn9Y12tu5MCZOcYaZ3P7b2qNTLwyWop6AHgSjAGrRZzp4vRBjF9Rp0e81 mIcI6LNXNe54Dz1hbLB0e6Y6LunJ8SbZR0dCWe2sGLkU9bt0fjqDXKP5tsqXuMhSX/Wb UkLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C1UrtGj1NVvpRr17txyoa61KMNP12uXdXDQK7vfOpks=; b=MfJ1xM/GUbmQoLUUwGrr7pp4WS74f2TxXl4YPI2yEcJpxgP7ixlz/CXro/MjVSN8df +WtPyDU1hxn99OkfCGK+OS4/S8cHZTo+6tlIwiWxUSIG3vwrdP7ZkwgUka24isuZ9ZgI mqNrXKLtSPWBy59+dDRdlsdX7O0z3vDPkkzpLuOeAynE+hesl/c/tCi7jSdrtZBhAPUO wrZg1k16WEd3aCD4lY5HY7mIp1T2NzauELITqSknKub0B37pI4zmu2VK8O1rgAfHhNBI al6O8rHirG6KhKTnHPv/pcEYTac9NyXqJLuBti99r71Zgrcma988NSb/BOAEkgxtU4Oz 6kKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3EsHgwbssITsR3LwehlfGM6YgtB+uIL94OLvAc7obhRf/A5Red 8/nMfwVd6yN4dNyfLd5J/w4BU5dJaFHoU1PqTdI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsyrIQf3uHZYmxCaEV6w+UBMunlCa5M5hvItPG3KS//fbrxGajnnLIKCMnE6VaBkIWSYDuC/9sRD/P72J3ai6k= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:27f2:: with SMTP id x47mr3263157qtx.302.1583941834349; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> <2f5e9a03-a68d-401b-9c05-3c55c913a7b1@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <2f5e9a03-a68d-401b-9c05-3c55c913a7b1@madpilot.net> From: Mario Olofo Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:50:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: Guido Falsi Cc: Ulf Rudolf , FreeBSD Stable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cxHw2F4Tz4CXt X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=L997grUO; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marioolofo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::830 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marioolofo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.24), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[web.de]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:38 -0000 Hello, I configured the full system with pkg and only build the drm-kmod. I downloaded the img from the 12.0 stable version, don't know when or why it become release for me =3DX The pkg was downloaded the first time I used it, so I don't know what can be wrong with it. May you point me some link to understand better how to see if i'm in stable/release and how to migrate from quarter to latest? I'll see if I'm in latest and reinstall all with pkg Thank you, Mario Em qua., 11 de mar. de 2020 =C3=A0s 12:24, Guido Falsi escreveu: > On 11/03/20 02:20, Mario Olofo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > @Guido > > I tried to rebuild the xorg-server but it stoped to recognize all input > > devices even on Xfce4, I think I'm missing something. > > Tried to rebuild the xf86-input-evdev too but didn't work either. > > Had to revert to the pkg version to be able to send this email > > Before these rebuilds were you using packages? from quarterly or latest? > > AFAIK mixing packages and locally built packages isn't really supported. > I works most of the time, but there are no warranties. Also it is > especially prone to breaking when building parts that work with hardware > drivers. > > So to properly upgrade your Xorg server if you're coming from quarterly > packages the safe way is to configure your machine to use latest > packages and perform a pkg upgrade. In rare cases you could need pkg > upgrade -f. > > If you want to use ports and have been using packages, only safe way is > to reinstall everything from ports, but I'd really suggest you use > project provided packages or build your own package set using a tool > like poudriere. > > Apart from this, new Xorg changes many things and upgrading only the > server will not be enough anyway. > > Unluckily if you don't perform a proper upgrade it's difficult to tell > if the problem is caused by a bug in some port or induced by some > misalignment on your system software. > > > > > @Ulf Rudolf > > Now knowing that the xorg-server is not recognizing any input devices > > after rebuild the latest version, I have a feeling that this problem is > > related, maybe the LightDM expects some specific device? > > LightDM uses Xorg for it's input, so, no it should work. Have you tried > using "startx" as root to check that Xorg itself works fine? > > -- > Guido Falsi > From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 17:15:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE690265998 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (vogon.madpilot.net [159.69.1.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48czBP4N8Nz4bbK for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48czBM2PBTz6dX7; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:15:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id aD9bmxQpjotM; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:15:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: Mario Olofo Cc: FreeBSD Stable , Ulf Rudolf References: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> <2f5e9a03-a68d-401b-9c05-3c55c913a7b1@madpilot.net> From: Guido Falsi Autocrypt: addr=mad@madpilot.net; keydata= mQENBE+G+l0BCADi/WBQ0aRJfnE7LBPsM0G3m/m3Yx7OPu4iYFvS84xawmRHtCNjWIntsxuX fptkmEo3Rsw816WUrek8dxoUAYdHd+EcpBcnnDzfDH5LW/TZ4gbrFezrHPdRp7wdxi23GN80 qPwHEwXuF0X4Wy5V0OO8B6VT/nA0ADYnBDhXS52HGIJ/GCUjgqJn+phDTdCFLvrSFdmgx4Wl c0W5Z1p5cmDF9l8L/hc959AeyNf7I9dXnjekGM9gVv7UDUYzCifR3U8T0fnfdMmS8NeI9NC+ wuREpRO4lKOkTnj9TtQJRiptlhcHQiAlG1cFqs7EQo57Tqq6cxD1FycZJLuC32bGbgalABEB AAG0Hkd1aWRvIEZhbHNpIDxtYWRAbWFkcGlsb3QubmV0PokBOQQTAQgAIwIbAwIeAQIXgAUL CQgHAwUVCgkICwQWAgMBBQJS79AgAhkBAAoJEBrmhg5Wy9KTc0kH/RO64ORBlTbTHaUaOj8F Je5O5NU2Pt9Cyt5ZWBRvxntr1zPTJGKRPS9ihlIfqT4ZvEngQGp57EUyFbCpI0UWasTerImM tt5WACnGmCzUTB39UXx8Oy4b1EgWeTJQ747e/F1mQLXTNa6ijRBE9fYlTb4gAkPN88/wVV9v 3PZozKLTg16ghBzHM/P7Lk8L7clPEZChX1FTa/6eSt3nvzfCuTMZbBPJF/ph+q1KyPqRgVfh tyhu5dvgMoPz/ni41IfeSrkJTD5RXzdyGR9q4Z1NYeBsLkRjC4LxKAP5KqUsvlOUjKvO1byj ApYdMarol+IGkaSk9e3zVYAJkWKjn/ni8Xa5Ag0EUxB7QQEQAKFhrDceoPdK/IHDSmoj6SQY isvM7VdhcleS7E9DoEAVt7yMbf6HbbMVTTY6ckvwTWQssywLBXNVqxgc4WLJjzfUhgef+WE7 5M3+WFYlOVQLGZY/zEVgma1raYnOHNAOzeHLDmEXjbZP6vGAeDyBbGfQPpE7qGYZ7ubeT3Xw QO+PklcCrvOPj2ZPcAxGNS2xVU/LzONqCrJqLMJSIcCdsbiSP4G5PnDFHtMokaTY6OEr8OEQ fOAerhcHUa/z7Uu8YtmaqKH+QGkE/WEgaRqSiTnv0JOTD+DxehaqvoKPPZ++2NpCZMHB2i6A /xifmQwEiIjEXtcueBRzkNUQkxhqZyS13SrhocL9ydtaVPBzZatAEjUDDEJmAMLVFs45qfyh MiNapHJo2n3MW/E5omqCvEkDdWX/en3P7CK2TemeaDghMsgkNKax/z0wNo5UZCkOPOz0xpNi UilOVbkuezZZNg65741qee2lfXhQIaZ66yT7hphc/N/z3PIAtLeze4u1VR2EXAuZ2sWAdlKC NTlJMsaU/x70BV11Wd/ypnVzM68dfdQIIAj1iMFAD/lXGlEUmKXg5Ov2VQDlTntQoanCYrAg +8CttPzjrydgLZFq3hrtQmfc0se5yv1WHS69+BsUOG09RvvawUDZxUjW19kyeN9THaNRgow3 kSuArUp6zSmJABEBAAGJAR8EGAEIAAkFAlMQe0ECGwwACgkQGuaGDlbL0pMN5wgA4bCkX/qw EVC06ToeR6C2putmSWQMgpDaqrv65Hubo+QGmg2P4ewTYQQ4g6oYWS03qHxqVVWhKz7FjfrV +dH8qbCLfSgIcvdBha7ayGZVrsiuMLKGbw36fcmkZPpSDOfHcP0XH8Z+u9CWj0xUkTxAlZ/7 i6gYSUpG2JWNtdmE/X8VVEyXusCLwy0K0BI60A/4dRTIX3C4QKrJ3ZbUXegz70ynjHf+lQMZ 9IZKASoRMuS5FozPQh6abvmwZEPdf5I9riUElzvHrqJ8Bx0t3Pujdoth+yNHpnBxrtO8LkQd rQ58P0SwcaIX33T2U9pG8bhu5YVR88FQ8OQ0cEsPBpDncrkBDQRPhvpdAQgAsd6mrOq1GSZw lzRscNQa9W2WB/3Tj4ON4PL2e9B+hc9lT/ny2zB3agXu5wbsXTzwxgJpQT7hNHkCSckW98h3 HRjFfhZPNCgInuUGsjcNyVguQh+/47ckhph0s7U+6B4yNuIiqQZk4mo8WgCNj1YIihVmGWEs gDOwMaajbDYZ0r1/3GkKlYjOXeUuT/WgourrSR5oZJVNA/k4X2H7M3JUr1BSc32L7BJt8M7A ntul6k17J0L8GmkvLvTUtQTO+p+DYQMna2ngD3PbAvQRcbEGnkg9ABrdEF0Wp4Gx+gGGWsyF KlHvPdMtgWAy3JsS+rQapG6LoW3yUJpwpEpA86KdBwARAQABiQEfBCgBCAAJBQJTEH0NAh0B AAoJEBrmhg5Wy9KTMZcIAMSsidGF4KpjGcKzhkNK0sEpevcelQ6DzgT7kcXuq6LQ6YOrbof2 /KPgGie9/ToFZfJXH8zE5GefqkKvHZbYssWilFvkI90F9n138kG205NB/2zlaQb74/v9ZMXJ XcipnIx+T2tOMCBgHJU41IMJmB+NfRt5A6CDytJdhWxqppsEo5jjy/7tJM1Nn47G87tAV8qV NUtzbS6zdnbHB4W2BJwCObbVv8epL3hu/L5efV2j2tSbVTmyvK/ClYMBqdtUo3uPX75GF/Ku YDCOP1BTA5zzmzp4PMVd+gmHcMgCZKY6lvcEtdi5FLI0we2kcY8ffPvM2d6MNhFsGLaVI95J 0oqJAR8EGAECAAkFAk+G+l0CGwwACgkQGuaGDlbL0pM18Qf9HTNNhu8N0ISKtmR8lgPhJuu8 9rOEa8KKEatr4fQ7gL+hmYOEqZ/yHLcPQvGxbAlLR7F0SheKvAEk4B1aFwGULPo0SzuO0d/W tVMEbGa95JTm/6mfiymWMlWf8UifD1MDKzzPR7Om0ybeoPM8S/RQTboUU1WLpwd4mg9pVJlK 0xr55GOSHNf4m7S+P1kvl3xgmEj14zVMq9yJBNWFlsQK5ciifh7sFpfuxWdEVbtgIdxpzImK LXSLA0vOroKAvxFTGBrBq3vxV6eUmaKyd5HbbWejmafY1ua5dcnew9lxpWKLdqkC27Vt0Cku +LtTY3325V+BChncwNcJJS7IMmBz6w== Message-ID: <081855ae-b33b-3245-f793-51086c3109f7@madpilot.net> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:15:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48czBP4N8Nz4bbK X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[madpilot.net:s=bjowvop61wgh]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[madpilot.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[madpilot.net,quarantine]; IP_SCORE(-2.01)[ip: (-8.66), ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(0.21), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:15:58 -0000 On 11/03/20 16:50, Mario Olofo wrote: > Hello, > > I configured the full system with pkg and only build the drm-kmod. > > I downloaded the img from the 12.0 stable version, don't know when or why > it become release for me =X This depends on how you updated it. I could guess you used freebsd-update at some point, but only you can know for sure. > The pkg was downloaded the first time I used it, so I don't know what can > be wrong with it. Nothing wrong with it, that's not what I meant. > May you point me some link to understand better how to see if i'm in > stable/release and how to migrate from quarter to latest? To check which version of FreeBSD you are using should be possible with freebsd-version(1), check it's man page, I'm not using stable versions, only releases and current, and I'm not sure what the output is on stable. Migrating from quarterly to latest is done by configuring pkg, you should read the full pkg.conf(5) man page. The EXAMPLES section has examples clearly explaining what you are asking for. > I'll see if I'm in latest and reinstall all with pkg This all depends on what you did on your system, any suggestion can only be generic. You need to know your system condition. You stated that you mixed binary packages installed via pkg from the official repositories with locally built ports. As I said this is not really supported, and if you only compiled locally part of Xorg and mixed it with quarterly packages you have an high risk of having inconsistent binaries on your system. Check your logs for useful errors. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 18:54:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7457267836; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vtr.rulingia.com (vtr.rulingia.com [IPv6:2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vtr.rulingia.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d1Mh0Nsqz4YGf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from server.rulingia.com (ppp239-208.static.internode.on.net [59.167.239.208]) by vtr.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BIrpRT031992 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:56 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BIrjEi054997 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:45 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02BIrj7E054996; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:45 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:45 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Niclas Zeising Cc: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , Poul-Henning Kamp , FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d1Mh0Nsqz4YGf X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of peter@rulingia.com designates 2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peter@rulingia.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[rulingia.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5800::/38, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.11)[ip: (-9.51), ipnet: 2001:19f0:5800::/38(-4.15), asn: 20473(-1.84), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:54:12 -0000 --OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-Mar-11 10:29:08 +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on=20 >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested=20 >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. The UPDATING entry says that it's switched from devd to udev. There's no mention of evdev or that the keycodes have been roto-tilled. It's basically a vanilla "things have been changed, see the documentation" entry. Given that entry, it's hardly surprising that people are confused. --=20 Peter Jeremy --OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE7rKYbDBnHnTmXCJ+FqWXoOSiCzQFAl5pM7RfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEVF QjI5ODZDMzA2NzFFNzRFNjVDMjI3RTE2QTU5N0EwRTRBMjBCMzQACgkQFqWXoOSi CzQWvw//Y5SjpYDjD10syVxXnqe85pUsKTPMQ4WBsUcM5JOOjI16pT7ICM68xxE4 TPtf+RhIoKEHV81FPFMeHeEHj4KesOtqOXcoO9rE4tFds49UsKrzyQI6rmd4X/dW 1qZ4jfd8pTGhsYqrkz2GdW/m1KBiccnURVKih5fRXq3C0pMULskLjrDXfcddK1o6 h6vJvaS98zs+3HImM60xFr7d+u76r7lDyUrw99Eix9sj4Ey7OwjLAa2SgPYIT1ob i/b5Pa9REPzojA2otCZpVqSIQCAn//q2MKMCJxXaImD5leVGAr6sM4v98eTa68oT D1GnnFwyRCLhGeotxaW4+mTMr/de1gt5V3xaofhuob8yPrQtODfupWQlGr1uKm/X KthCkTjSi2C4dlm/zx4uGBCVjxr+MhOVMSoHSrxl6GQKodADO5xc9IpiGFEhHmhV BUO2WyN6HJJvYjEdOoDYc6g/OW9XldzgdQQ2VeE+tGyBIJ3eYbcP1YpfBWHiPILM IvOrjDGdQsGX+faysaEct0hWSEunCax+OLf6gXqZz6yIM+jXqeGQS1fx1eSr39iI ahXEesaC1Jzyuyl1WwOaNdM8/M3cnIWb2PH1z5K5WoB7A3E+65FGAvwWc0zBOmFI 5OYzv0t0os8+ha15kYfbBk7t5f/b/MdKfVpHUEKJinue+gECpOQ= =8Q1d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM-- From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 20:51:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3DF26A48A; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-stable@tharned.org) Received: from roadkill.tharned.org (tunnel294749-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:107f::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "tharned.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d3yf05wSz3xvj; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-stable@tharned.org) Received: from flake.tharned.org ([IPv6:2001:470:1f11:107f:ddbd:4b8:b255:4e4f]) (authenticated bits=0) by roadkill.tharned.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 02BKouSZ058076 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-stable@tharned.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tharned.org; s=2017; t=1583959857; bh=1gVIT5V2N+HD+81RIaStWuit93WZW6xWUOBXScMfF00=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NrOLYp58tQ/fMHIiqVpKelVPhe4JDRkxBVe0fpSyr3/4avhaAsE5YDlOyrcsPbW6Q yaWgELYh9B0GBA7JSIhacPTtG+kpBY2c3vy8O8/pQZVAoXmcMXyo3Wdn68eCTmFgMo y5dbrlW0O2q3euHgzIGGlK2eV6FHORUHaJZdMLUHfoFLYFuQnXtsBJ1wto1eN3Hu7I abgMn1O4alzO3Wk0+v2ic6j1cRN9lo+f9VZOtwOJMjdn+cDfCJ4Eh9hJtxr9TrWYJH 7HI4zV0JsR3Za5kz0nFV3EwcyvBCkmyAXSzNq+EeZBn3SAARlentgmn3QHqQctZpxB q1oMJfXMTXsaQ== X-Authentication-Warning: roadkill.tharned.org: Host [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:107f:ddbd:4b8:b255:4e4f] claimed to be flake.tharned.org From: Greg Rivers To: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1938208.uJW0cDvVUg@no.place.like.home> In-Reply-To: <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (roadkill.tharned.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:107f:0:0:0:2]); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:57 -0500 (CDT) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d3yf05wSz3xvj X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tharned.org header.s=2017 header.b=NrOLYp58; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gcr@tharned.org has no SPF policy when checking 2001:470:1f10:107f::2) smtp.mailfrom=gcr@tharned.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.39 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tharned.org:s=2017]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[tharned.org.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tharned.org]; IP_SCORE(-3.59)[ip: (-9.66), ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.65), asn: 6939(-3.59), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tharned.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd-stable]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:51:08 -0000 On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 13:53:45 CDT Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2020-Mar-11 10:29:08 +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on > >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested > >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. > > The UPDATING entry says that it's switched from devd to udev. There's no > mention of evdev or that the keycodes have been roto-tilled. It's basically > a vanilla "things have been changed, see the documentation" entry. Given > that entry, it's hardly surprising that people are confused. > Indeed, the change has been a bit inconvenient and time consuming to deal with. But I don't think we should let this overshadow the dedication and very hard work that Niclas and the graphics team have done and continue to do to keep FreeBSD relevant on the desktop. I for one am very grateful for that. -- Greg From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 21:55:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5AE26B648; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d5NQ38Pgz47gs; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id s15so3818268otq.8; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I4kDrVcv+D5tWylqhFh6JruZUIXb9+0xSmSUCi/1X3c=; b=Lrre1a9+SL95X+9aYtDznSGySwJvvTv37TalVcSWaMYP4iKFl4yM0axGE7dfPsChbI Cm535x31LrWLhhySwgEOL6A7VBQdo7J41rJTQ+dxLREeF3cJuQRfECNyxY8+K8vO+yvl CnsscolpfNXViG42wJos8Q4fuAqX4FDvXjzAFbFYQm3estDdONNp1WAtdOOKGZiPy2kF qcemJCmZTIv75f8TFIwwSLe731mdusjRjD3RM7t0Snfbg79ZqaLMwQXOWsnttc7Zmg1t aQamd8GY3vk+WHHQAt65i4E6PTJd2MxkQX0268DPzbzK/hvZT3q6z4bQqD6HRCYw3L9h Tr6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I4kDrVcv+D5tWylqhFh6JruZUIXb9+0xSmSUCi/1X3c=; b=s0kQNcCTDDhyplK1JKDoG3FUV68qou3XbqxA6/19AIxoeIS89n7Do7iaAWWjlBPVKi 9sjfaWZK2d6aBs7KB8EqQ2ZSi1PokioHU/lbsYbNkYXLBXmGTe+P5itN4eJm00Z1d5eO v10ObmFDoeWebU2ePIyne1qtRYDd/W5lQu5DY2B5i0aRTmXLnz90pw2QUnuFY1N6tbAt QySCMPBIZiu/tfrpcJ/JwyFmIWXG8YnOFQ0yMVO0GjHqPVuEKi+iYw49E7/ZIL6rHN2H 64ffLcDhjs4MMbRtgTjd5hcRn+wrdKgA1rhso7kZNm/Cyx0K7xnQJbyB/15cvWPNE8ZK uYzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2Z3mGTuDKZamqypbFDDj8MT/Hu5pl9VNTMWYXnR7yu1OV5waWf F1wvfu8B+xR/P31BadVNlwWBBn37bq/+kJmsPc2exQzP X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu7Oy7yj5YvJpcUMcX03FBbq0CmWqNdQXUJRdoJqtuA2A8zKPAr0oetJdl3hv2kGpoh+4O3fIR2rQLAWu+4LMU= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d0c7:: with SMTP id u7mr1791360oor.83.1583963700400; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:55:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> <1938208.uJW0cDvVUg@no.place.like.home> In-Reply-To: <1938208.uJW0cDvVUg@no.place.like.home> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:54:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes To: Greg Rivers Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d5NQ38Pgz47gs X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Lrre1a9+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd-stable]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-8.19), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:55:03 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:51 PM Greg Rivers wrote: > On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 13:53:45 CDT Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2020-Mar-11 10:29:08 +0100, Niclas Zeising > wrote: > > >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on > > >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested > > >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. > > > > The UPDATING entry says that it's switched from devd to udev. There's no > > mention of evdev or that the keycodes have been roto-tilled. It's > basically > > a vanilla "things have been changed, see the documentation" entry. Given > > that entry, it's hardly surprising that people are confused. > > > Indeed, the change has been a bit inconvenient and time consuming to deal > with. > > But I don't think we should let this overshadow the dedication and very > hard work that Niclas and the graphics team have done and continue to do to > keep FreeBSD relevant on the desktop. I for one am very grateful for that. > > -- > Greg > And the people involved have been very active in helping people resolve the problems. In particular, Michael Gmelin had been very helpful in providing a workaround for the failure of the brightness control buttons on my rather ancient T520. He has also provided a solution for the failure of the volume control buttons that I've had since the last update to MATE. I have yet to try it as something else (no idea what) had magically fixed this after a couple of months of them not working. I can't figure out what "fixed" this, but it just started working a couple of weeks ago. Until/unless it fails, I'm not touching things. Also, my apologies to Michael as I have not responded to him with a status update for WAY too long. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 21:58:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C79026B9C5; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d5Sb098gz4FcT; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BLvTjp005903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:57:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02BLvS4I005902; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:57:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:57:28 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d5Sb098gz4FcT X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.902,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.995,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:58:41 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > ??? > >> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > >> wrote: > > ??? > >> > >>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > >>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > >> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > >> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > > > > And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > > alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > > frustration). > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > > > > > > This *might* help you: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > > (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 22:24:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BB126C6DD; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d62Y0B6bz3xcN; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BMNSRD006020 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:23:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02BMNSdq006019; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:23:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:23:28 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d62Y0B6bz3xcN X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.901,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.995,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:24:39 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >> ??? > >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > >>>> wrote: > >>> ??? > >>>> > >>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > >>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > >>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > >>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > >>> > >>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > >>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > >>> frustration). > >>> > >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > >>> > >>> > >> > >> This *might* help you: > >> > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > >> > >> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > >> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > > > > Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > > > > It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it before the wm starts - you could also try running it afterwards to see if it makes a difference. I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the Alt-up,down,left,right keys don't work as they used to in my ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window to the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that is also pressed (while holding the Alt key down). Also, Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in the direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do nothing now. Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 23:01:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC92026D78B; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d6sW5PfTz49K6; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6F1416054; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:01:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:01:43 +0100 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: Bob Willcox Cc: Michael Gmelin , Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311230143.0jnF_%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Willcox , Michael Gmelin , Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.17-52-g56288e6a OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d6sW5PfTz49K6 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.73)[-0.727,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.987,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE]; IP_SCORE(0.31)[asn: 15987(1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:01:52 -0000 Bob Willcox wrote in <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com>: |On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: |>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec |>>> wrote: ... |>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way |>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. ... |> This *might* help you: |> |> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html |> |> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., |> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) | |Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they \ |use to be? I for one am totally baffled that you all "just can go". My ~/.xinitrc is (in parts) if command -v setxkbmap >/dev/null 2>&1; then if [ -f ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xkbmap ]; then setxkbmap `cat ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xkbmap` elif [ -f ~/.xkbmap ]; then setxkbmap `cat ~/.xkbmap` fi fi if command -v xmodmap >/dev/null 2>&1; then [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc [ -f ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xmodmaprc fi if command -v xrdb >/dev/null 2>&1; then [ -f ~/.Xdefaults ] && xrdb -merge ~/.Xdefaults [ -f ~/.${HOSTNAME}.Xdefaults ] && xrdb -merge ~/.${HOSTNAME}.Xdefaults fi and i (i think ever) had to _have_ those (former being 'de(nodeadkeys)', the middle one too long to paste, but also works around the "g" key of that Lenovo notebook ever since that stopped working). --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 09:32:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED00925AB71; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from mailgate.Leidinger.net (mailgate.leidinger.net [IPv6:2a00:1828:2000:313::1:5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dNs520mMz44P8; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5B165A40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.22.90.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailgate.Leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 649483615; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:32:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.8.242.239] (unknown [194.154.203.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: Alexander@Leidinger.net) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9969A358D; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:31:41 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger To: Bob Willcox , Michael Gmelin CC: Mark Martinec , , Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:31:40 +0100 Message-ID: <170ce15cc60.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dNs520mMz44P8 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[leidinger.net:s=outgoing-alex]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[leidinger.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[Leidinger.net,quarantine]; IP_SCORE(-3.73)[ip: (-9.83), ipnet: 2a00:1828::/32(-4.91), asn: 34240(-3.91), country: DE(-0.02)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[64.90.22.91.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34240, ipnet:2a00:1828::/32, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:32:27 -0000 Hi, This command sets the keyboard layout. You are supposed to set the keyboard layout which matches the physical layout of the hardware. This hadn't changed, it's a fundamental part of X11 since I know it (X11 6.5) and even before... For those which had an explicit setting in xorg.conf (like me) but switched now to nothing or the "match" snippets for mouse or kbd: you can specify this already in the config. Here is what I use: ---snip--- Donnerstag, 12. März 2020, 10:21:40 {1} [video:/] (201) root@ttypts/1 # cat /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/kbd.conf Section "InputClass" Identifier "Keyboard0" MatchIsKeyboard "on" MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*" Driver "libinput" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "de" Option "XkbRules" "evdev" EndSection Donnerstag, 12. März 2020, 10:22:05 {0} [video:/] (202) root@ttypts/1 # cat /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/mouse.conf Section "InputClass" Identifier "Mouse0" MatchIsPointer "on" MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*" Driver "libinput" # Option "Protocol" "auto" # Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection ---snip--- Note, I use this in sysctl.conf: ---snip--- # enable hardware devices in evdev kern.evdev.rcpt_mask=12 ---snip--- When I did that, I just validated that I was able to login to KDE (the particular X11 is feeding a home-cinema setup and is not used often, I just decided to update it as long as I remembered there was a change to xorg with a config impact). I didn't check any up/down/umlauts, I just plain assumed it works (and I still assume it does). The above is just meant to provide some info how to make it work globally instead of having a setting in each local startup per user. Bye, Alexander. -- Send from a mobile device, please forgive brevity and misspellings. Am 11. März 2020 23:07:55 schrieb Bob Willcox : > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> ??? >> >> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec >> >> wrote: >> > ??? >> >> >> >>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >> >>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. >> >> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on >> >> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. >> > >> > And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", >> > alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a >> > frustration). >> > >> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 >> > >> > >> >> This *might* help you: >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html >> >> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., >> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > > Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > > > > -- > Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to > bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. > Austin, TX | > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 11:50:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFA125DEAE for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dRwQ3mLsz3Ky0 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id x1so716926qkx.10 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:50:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yrek/FarYZuvdhCMaa25SlmRYa/cVjwD1Snebh6eAc8=; b=KEmeRVoejHWpkURyitPSv2L3dxxQ3ry10+56Tk4EdhjLPBLxU/mPe6egeAVaugBb7p snOJBDmnFUz04ESxp0fUNqvsGTEd584+UgT07xq1lUOxyqXf0Iv7c/6dmpfLcXJ0RhHL 9E5mc+Li0CPlVljPMii8x3OEQ+9pqC2JrkvKi1qdT20uk1TMjBfbhNPSaqTt++ybet6S rNwrSN4yzE9E0XHq5tTseXI24QlC646Dx/8Lmz0W/bXqVdXtz2z+y6pnjUBiJNuBHxtj cqmi6zgjV60Tex5r9T8Y2TUf0S5S2HaYy+RkYlzKYVlrbloTuRCgUtxXpALxwrSz/M2c pOBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yrek/FarYZuvdhCMaa25SlmRYa/cVjwD1Snebh6eAc8=; b=tm1wMaNqj3yNd8IVlAhao1nEmBep6Mz5EpFL/zdfBbMfSp+l3KV+onr0g1gqIY9ZpQ e/o4Avkixb7klLPaLmrFu49jiPZjfA8v32tuk+66hInZm9g8/9LmFopXcLnLfNzSFS7o eMPV50jRRzDcTGsNBybs0h6TA40kq2R8tUHQbNFhUGLYP0VbPVvbT+2Bfg7GbMepSDgs fHYeV8XFzKsrLek0tL/AjIEXMvOTXy3Ieu4u1UFQr09r4ua/45ZoqYr9Bzw6OUCLlbcf b4Jy2i9Ye8tvE64WW8MoSjRMO5dJxxDsfgChERVmCYBh46XYhCwjQq8qe7CSs4nnnPoY woBA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2x+dmAygTlynjxVYlbLxREfFbdFuLQsNV06k8n4/5bR1T+sUbw +vtRtYwmm7m8fsu9FGfaGXYj/QFCVnN5RWredsBcdg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvkna3kBek+zSkeL1kbSxfi1n64MbYOV7qQOzHe8ev7S9+n5IVw0muBJHOFDg71JRWPq01dMORS8k4/j0jQhJI= X-Received: by 2002:a37:e40d:: with SMTP id y13mr7242692qkf.39.1584013829274; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:50:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> <2f5e9a03-a68d-401b-9c05-3c55c913a7b1@madpilot.net> <081855ae-b33b-3245-f793-51086c3109f7@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <081855ae-b33b-3245-f793-51086c3109f7@madpilot.net> From: Mario Olofo Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:50:17 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: Guido Falsi Cc: FreeBSD Stable , Ulf Rudolf X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dRwQ3mLsz3Ky0 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KEmeRVoe; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marioolofo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::734 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marioolofo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.3.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.17), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:50:32 -0000 > This depends on how you updated it. I could guess you used > freebsd-update at some point, but only you can know for sure. > Indeed I did a freebsd-update, but I thought it just update the system to patch vulnerabilities, not change it to release... To check which version of FreeBSD you are using should be possible with > freebsd-version(1), check it's man page, I'm not using stable versions, > only releases and current, and I'm not sure what the output is on stable. > > Migrating from quarterly to latest is done by configuring pkg, you > should read the full pkg.conf(5) man page. The EXAMPLES section has > examples clearly explaining what you are asking for. > > Thank you, I should have take a look on man pages before ask, after the change, the pkg was updated successfully. This all depends on what you did on your system, any suggestion can only > be generic. You need to know your system condition. > > You stated that you mixed binary packages installed via pkg from the > official repositories with locally built ports. As I said this is not > really supported, and if you only compiled locally part of Xorg and > mixed it with quarterly packages you have an high risk of having > inconsistent binaries on your system. > > Check your logs for useful errors. > Yeah, I mixed pkg and ports but after that I removed all ports packages and reinstalled the pkg version, so the system reverted to a safe/stable state. After the change to latest, the pkg upgrade found a lot of files to update, including xorg-server, xfce and xorg-drivers. But, after the update to latest, only my usb mouse is detected on xserver now... The log don't have any errors, the Xorg log don't have any output about touchpad and laptop keyboard too. The glitch in window titles was fixed after the update, so this is now ok =). The only problem now is the keyboard/touchpad in X. I need to rebuild the kernel too? Any other command I can run to check if I need something more? Thank you Mario From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 12:26:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25BA25F86C; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dSjd4TnMz3PND; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02CCOgpV007576 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:24:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02CCOgMZ007575; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:24:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:24:42 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dSjd4TnMz3PND X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.901,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.995,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:26:15 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 11. Mar 2020, at 23:25, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >> > >> > >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: > >>> > >>> ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >>>> ??? > >>>>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> ??? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > >>>>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > >>>>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > >>>>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > >>>>> > >>>>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > >>>>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > >>>>> frustration). > >>>>> > >>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> This *might* help you: > >>>> > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > >>>> > >>>> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > >>>> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > >>> > >>> Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > >>> > >> > >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it before the wm starts - you could also try running it afterwards to see if it makes a difference. > > > > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the Alt-up,down,left,right keys > > don't work as they used to in my ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window > > to the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that is also pressed (while > > holding the Alt key down). Also, Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in > > the direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do nothing now. > > > > I don???t know much about ctwm, but why don???t you give it a shot? I plan to sometime today when I get into the office. But since it's my work system and I am dependent on it to do my job, I've just been a little hesitant. Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 15:38:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FB4263C05; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dXzJ4VDvz4HRY; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02CFaio1007927 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02CFagWf007926; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312153629.GA7853@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dXzJ4VDvz4HRY X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.907,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.996,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:38:22 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:24:42AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > On 11. Mar 2020, at 23:25, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > > ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: > > >>> > > >>> ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >>>> ??? > > >>>>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> ??? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > > >>>>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > > >>>>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > > >>>>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > > >>>>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > > >>>>> frustration). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> This *might* help you: > > >>>> > > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > > >>>> > > >>>> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > > >>>> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > > >>> > > >>> Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > > >>> > > >> > > >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it before the wm starts - you could also try running it afterwards to see if it makes a difference. > > > > > > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the Alt-up,down,left,right keys > > > don't work as they used to in my ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window > > > to the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that is also pressed (while > > > holding the Alt key down). Also, Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in > > > the direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do nothing now. > > > > > > > I don???t know much about ctwm, but why don???t you give it a shot? > > I plan to sometime today when I get into the office. But since it's my work system and I > am dependent on it to do my job, I've just been a little hesitant. Ok, I added this to my ~/.xinitrc file: setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout us and my ctwm window adjustment hot keys are working again. :) I do wonder why it was deemed ok to change the default behavior for the key mappings? Couldn't the default mappings have remained the same with change to evdev? This change certainly violated the "principle of least surprise" for me. > > Bob > > -- > Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to > bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. > Austin, TX | -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 16:02:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A42264A01; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dYWT2vdqz4BKQ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02CG19s3008006 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:01:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02CG19o9008005; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:01:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:01:09 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312160109.GB7853@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> <20200312153629.GA7853@rancor.immure.com> <20200312165332.58af13f7@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312165332.58af13f7@bsd64.grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dYWT2vdqz4BKQ X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.92)[0.920,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.996,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:46 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 04:53:32PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0500 > Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:24:42AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > SNIP SNAP > > > > >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? > > > > >> problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the > > > > >> correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At > > > > >> least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it > > > > >> before the wm starts - you could also try running it > > > > >> afterwards to see if it makes a difference. > > > > > > > > > > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the > > > > > Alt-up,down,left,right keys don't work as they used to in my > > > > > ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window to > > > > > the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that > > > > > is also pressed (while holding the Alt key down). Also, > > > > > Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in the > > > > > direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do > > > > > nothing now. > > > > > > > > I don???t know much about ctwm, but why don???t you give it a > > > > shot? > > > > > > I plan to sometime today when I get into the office. But since it's > > > my work system and I am dependent on it to do my job, I've just > > > been a little hesitant. > > > > Ok, I added this to my ~/.xinitrc file: > > > > setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout us > > > > and my ctwm window adjustment hot keys are working again. :) > > > > I do wonder why it was deemed ok to change the default behavior for > > the key mappings? Couldn't the default mappings have remained the > > same with change to evdev? This change certainly violated the > > "principle of least surprise" for me. > > > > > > I think the change was unavoidable, but it could've been communicated > better. Then again, time and resources are limited and I'm quite > grateful the graphics team finally made that necessary push forward. > > I'm curious how people set their keyboard layout in the past though, > is it possible that the defaults just worked for US users? I always had > to set it explicitly (setxkbmap or in Xorg.conf), so I was never really > affected by this change. > > -m > > p.s. What does "setxkbmap -query" show if you start X without setting > the keymap in .xinitrc? I'll have to try that when I get home tonight on one of my other systems as I really can't afford to take the time to restart X on this system now...got to get some work done. :) Bob > > -- > Michael Gmelin -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 20:55:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027F026B863 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dh1l3YVkz3JNs for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.olofo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id z8so2257608qto.12 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:55:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ls9g6yfGM/SuRsJZI7PLjQ9BRhpLh3h+2OjWdRwqi+Q=; b=JsarBqDS5EhqkYQkY1poulC/qX4C8qCMq4S1dnHH+09l8WRUaU+NbJ1Bo7Rhgibyuu 7aigF6e0+eSoD2MvsRu65bHkC/U3ZiCKEiNbUWzpz3cSzXbxmX0/RhizG1GDtRIcYXgi DbHfnJEOHRvFhDwpratGj3WXdAUGoxiBikR/Z324H6upk6kY8Y0FCFwFza/jo0q9l/JS crxqrUS8A5UmkIgQZ0ZaTFI9XpwmQwqqy7mpXKJRNytRHir7v8aHxPs5JHCFKbAoGQY6 CWhHAQbMC9Zck1fe/azPMs0VsMdgMEddAsWzVSlfWoFG8Lxi2FgoctlIy/1x1zHmj5Z/ swag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Ls9g6yfGM/SuRsJZI7PLjQ9BRhpLh3h+2OjWdRwqi+Q=; b=iOVgHHz2bWdV3RQOJ+Jk4XIQ66Gpdq6q4d10BFZ8t7FVtcGFCrokZLo/+Od0kgrpSi 34MAdSk6P8ii2nddKzb14V7BSzmxQWRxucbolfHM1748wdq66wh6QnfIklagTeFaAPFz nCxc8ODtlbvRrTQcGo+nEyeBv8W8op6ZggY5GaOV0kz4lPLfNNxn0Eu2krosYTCPterY dCx9pPRVf0RAuaykpUJ0fdf7SgRBnb95tI8aRplKLB7PI/9UEcAo23t9mpsaC/9MABaF pu43sdXUlhZ66dV+HBx2L4K2Wkb4cgSw3STnhE/JhLRP8b88rRFNKhFjifforLvMuh7m 5qSw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0odnuwSrubLLoipTNr0cSlVucXhX6jVaFk1RQQAACMPSun9GJu nrgNJxNDQgXJ9cbKMT4lNycn74uAUBK8N4bOt4B9ng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvfwgfDhygL0oL7MFIDIICAyl/PRnY9RH3ugurgLHRXZxAcAphb6DgdrG6t4e5fwkmjSjii6T7bwispMECKmJU= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:45cb:: with SMTP id e11mr4836654qto.29.1584046554004; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:55:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2e110cde-ab59-43d8-deb9-8e0417842e38@madpilot.net> <2f5e9a03-a68d-401b-9c05-3c55c913a7b1@madpilot.net> <081855ae-b33b-3245-f793-51086c3109f7@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: From: Mario Olofo Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:55:43 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FBSD 12.1 - LightDM don't grab keyboard input & Xfce4 window decorator problem To: Guido Falsi , FreeBSD Stable , Ulf Rudolf X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dh1l3YVkz3JNs X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JsarBqDS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marioolofo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marioolofo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.32), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:55:58 -0000 Hello guys, Good news, all the problems are solved! Searching and reading about the upgrade of xorg-server, I did what the installation message says, and the kern.evdev.rcpt_mask=3D6 was the flag I needed! Long history short, I learned 2 things: 1- RTFM and all messages that pop up 2- The devd was replaced by udev, so evdev with libinput is the default for automatic input detection on X now Thanks for the help! Mario Em qui., 12 de mar. de 2020 =C3=A0s 08:50, Mario Olofo escreveu: > > This depends on how you updated it. I could guess you used >> freebsd-update at some point, but only you can know for sure. >> > > Indeed I did a freebsd-update, but I thought it just update the system to > patch vulnerabilities, not change it to release... > > To check which version of FreeBSD you are using should be possible with >> freebsd-version(1), check it's man page, I'm not using stable versions, >> only releases and current, and I'm not sure what the output is on stable= . >> >> Migrating from quarterly to latest is done by configuring pkg, you >> should read the full pkg.conf(5) man page. The EXAMPLES section has >> examples clearly explaining what you are asking for. >> >> > Thank you, I should have take a look on man pages before ask, after the > change, the pkg was updated successfully. > > This all depends on what you did on your system, any suggestion can only >> be generic. You need to know your system condition. >> >> You stated that you mixed binary packages installed via pkg from the >> official repositories with locally built ports. As I said this is not >> really supported, and if you only compiled locally part of Xorg and >> mixed it with quarterly packages you have an high risk of having >> inconsistent binaries on your system. >> >> Check your logs for useful errors. >> > > Yeah, I mixed pkg and ports but after that I removed all ports packages > and reinstalled the pkg version, so the system reverted to a safe/stable > state. > After the change to latest, the pkg upgrade found a lot of files to > update, including xorg-server, xfce and xorg-drivers. > But, after the update to latest, only my usb mouse is detected on xserver > now... > The log don't have any errors, the Xorg log don't have any output about > touchpad and laptop keyboard too. > > The glitch in window titles was fixed after the update, so this is now ok > =3D). > The only problem now is the keyboard/touchpad in X. > I need to rebuild the kernel too? Any other command I can run to check if > I need something more? > > Thank you > > Mario > From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 12:48:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0483025EAF6; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48f58X4SYyz3FXr; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02DCjwF6010299 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:45:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02DCjtcO010298; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:45:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:45:55 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Alexander Leidinger , Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200313124546.GC1053@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> <170ce15cc60.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> <20200312111153.687dd887@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312111153.687dd887@bsd64.grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48f58X4SYyz3FXr X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.36)[ip: (0.17), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.984,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:48:14 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:11:53AM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:31:40 +0100 > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This command sets the keyboard layout. You are supposed to set the > > keyboard layout which matches the physical layout of the hardware. > > This hadn't changed, it's a fundamental part of X11 since I know it > > (X11 6.5) and even before... > > [snip] > > Exactly. I just personally prefer to use setxkbmap, as all my setups are > single user (one unprivileged user per machine that runs X, no shared > machines) and customization happens in $HOME that way. Makes it a > bit easier to setup a new machine (no digging in Xorg configs) and > reading ~/.xinitrc basically tells me all about my current config. > > Plus, setxkbmap makes it easy to experiment, as it's applies changes > while X is running, even if one makes the those changes permanently in > an xorg config file later. And the resulting command is just one line > (in my case as short as "setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de"), makes it > easier to support people. > > Another useful application of the command is for debugging: > "setxkbmap -query" will tell you what's currently configured (regardless > how that configuration was done), e.g., > > On a machine running xorg 1.18: > > # setxkbmap -query > rules: base > model: pc105 > layout: de > > On a machine running xorg 1.20: > rules: evdev > model: pc105 > layout: de > > In both cases the same setxkbmap command was used in ~/.xinitrc to set > model and layout. Rules were taken from Xorg's default config, which > changed to evdev in 1.20. I ran "setxkbmap -query" on my home workstation that hasn't had X updated on it yet and this is what I got: rules: base model: pc105 layout: us So presumably that was the default setting from when I installed the system last April. I plan to run this again after I update xorg on this system, but not too sure when I'll get to that. Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 01:57:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1572724B5 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nsstlmta31p.bpe.bigpond.com (nsstlmta31p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fQfk6DBZz459L for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.24.4]) by nsstlfep31p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20200314015654.UIPD5042.nsstlfep31p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:56:54 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddvkedggedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhkfgtggfuffgjvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehnughrvgifucftvghilhhlhicuoegrrhgvihhllhihsegsihhgphhonhgurdhnvghtrdgruheqnecukfhppedutddurddukedtrddutdekrdegtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegluddtrddtrddtrdeingdpihhnvghtpedutddurddukedtrddutdekrdegtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeorghrvghilhhlhiessghighhpohhnugdrnhgvthdrrghuqedprhgtphhtthhopeeotghhrhhishesthhhvghorhihudegrdhnvghtqedprhgtphhtthhopeeofhhrvggvsghsugdqshhtrggslhgvsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgqedprhgtphhtthhopeeomhgrthhtrdhgrghrsggvrhesghhmrghilhdrtghomheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehrsgesghhiugdrtghordhukheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehthhgvrhhonhdrthgrrhhighhosehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqe X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using ID areilly@bigpond.net.au Received: from [10.0.0.6] (101.180.108.40) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.418) (authenticated as areilly@bigpond.net.au) id 5E5C75140400C0EE; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:56:54 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Subject: Re: Long-shot: repeatable macOS samba share unmounting during Lightroom import Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:56:45 +1100 In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Theron , rb@gid.co.uk, chris@theory14.net To: Matt Garber References: <28504691-D08B-483B-B4C5-CA47F2C523ED@bigpond.net.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fQfk6DBZz459L X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bigpond.net.au; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of areilly@bigpond.net.au designates 203.38.21.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=areilly@bigpond.net.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[bigpond.net.au]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:203.38.21.0/24]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bigpond.net.au,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[31.21.38.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[bigpond.net.au]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[40.108.180.101.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 203.36.0.0/14(-3.84), asn: 1221(-2.41), country: AU(0.01)]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:57:06 -0000 HI again, You might remember my Samba-related cry for help, last November. I'm = writing again to report that the problem has been resolved on my = systems, as near as I can tell. Perhaps my experience will help others. The "fix" has come as a result of some changes to my filesystem = structure that I made as a result of a recent drive replacement (the = 1.8T of photos from my last trip ran me out of storage). The upshot of = that is that I don't know whether my previous troubles were = misconfiguration on my part, or some sort of subtle bug in any of the = players at the table: Samba on FreeBSD on ZFS or macOS Catalina's smbfs. = After some experimentation I was able to conclude that Lightroom itself = was unlikely to be the root problem: failure was easily repeatable with = a find in a macOS terminal session. Quick summary of the problem: macOS Catalina would silently and = seemingly-spontaneously disconnect from my Samba filesystems, exported = from my FreeBSD-12-STABLE server when doing any activity that listed or = stat-ed all of the files in a directory of some thousands. To make = matters worse, before the macOS 10.15.3 release, this disconnection = would leave the smbfs driver, or some other macOS kernel state broken, = and it would not be possible to re-mount or properly eject the failed = mount without a reboot. Since I was rebooting a lot, Apple were getting = a lot of crash dumps from me, and their 10.15.3 release seems to have = fixed whatever was stuck in the kernel - reboots were no longer required = - but the disconnection problem persisted. I have a couple of users on the file server, with the usual home = directories in /home/ and these were exported using Samba's = [homes] configuration stanza, in the usual fashion. I also had a shared = directory, at /home/us, which was exported by a separate Samba stanza = with an explicit path =3D /home/us, because "us" isn't a user. When the drives filled up and I installed a new set, since I was going = to restore from backups I took the opportunity to create a new zfs file = system for "us" (/tank/us), and tweaked the smb4.conf accordingly. That seems to have returned the file systems/server/macOS combination to = robust good health. I have not experienced a spontaneous-unmount since = that change, and nothing else about the configuration has changed. My guess: SMB2 enhanced security rules, which Samba enforces, insist = that each host can only log-in/mount a given share once: any secondary = mount attempt should cause the server to drop all mounts. (Sorry, I = can't remember which reference site pointed that out to me.) Perhaps = Samba is interpreting the rule on the basis of underlying host-side = filesystem structure? That would put the old /home/us and /home/uname = shares on the same filesystem, and trigger the security rule? Well, I = always had both "mounted", but perhaps there was a particular pattern of = heavy or slow access that triggered something? Anyway, having all of = the filesystems exported by Samba coming from unique zfs filesystems on = the FreeBSD side has made everything happy. Yay? FWIW I'm running the latest Samba-4.10.13 from ports on FreeBSD = 12.1-STABLE r358963 GENERIC amd64 on a AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core = Processor with hardware threads turned on. By the way, the current Samba stable release is 4.12.0 (one week old) = and 4.11.0 was released last September. Is there some particular = incompatibility with FreeBSD that is keeping these out of Ports? I got = quite close to trying to build the newer version myself, but then the = problem went away... Cheers, Andrew Reilly M: 0409-824-272 areilly@bigpond.net.au > On 24 Nov 2019, at 13:46 , Matt Garber wrote: >=20 > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 9:34 PM Andrew Reilly > wrote: >=20 > The other protagonist in this tale, also connected to the gigabit > LAN, is an iMac running current-Catalina on APFS flash, mounting > three filesystems over SMB, from Samba 4.10.10. After appropriate > Samba tweaking this seems to be at least as reliable as it ever was > with netatalk or NFS, and apparently better supported by Apple. >=20 > Considering all of the other bugs and instability introduced (or = reintroduced) in Catalina: did you have this same Lightroom import = workflow configured in Mojave (or whichever other previous macOS version = you were using), and if so, were you encountering the same issue? >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > =E2=80=94 > Matt Garber >=20 From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 02:16:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC319273B10 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nsstlmta02p.bpe.bigpond.com (nsstlmta02p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fR5Q2l8Mz4fQG for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.24.4]) by nsstlfep02p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20200314021635.IGEK23949.nsstlfep02p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:16:35 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddvkedggeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucegtddtnecunecujfgurhephfgtggfuffhfvfgjkffosegrtdhmrehhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetnhgurhgvficutfgvihhllhihuceorghrvghilhhlhiessghighhpohhnugdrnhgvthdrrghuqeenucfkphepuddtuddrudektddruddtkedrgedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgdutddrtddrtddriegnpdhinhgvthepuddtuddrudektddruddtkedrgedtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegrrhgvihhllhihsegsihhgphhonhgurdhnvghtrdgruheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehfrhgvvggsshguqdhsthgrsghlvgesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgheq X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using ID areilly@bigpond.net.au Received: from [10.0.0.6] (101.180.108.40) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.418) (authenticated as areilly@bigpond.net.au) id 5DF700671E74B707 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:16:35 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Subject: Re: Samba version in ports Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:16:34 +1100 References: <28504691-D08B-483B-B4C5-CA47F2C523ED@bigpond.net.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <5C30A2D6-4F33-4CCA-AA43-D37E6D79778A@bigpond.net.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fR5Q2l8Mz4fQG X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bigpond.net.au; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of areilly@bigpond.net.au designates 203.38.21.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=areilly@bigpond.net.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.91)[-0.914,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:203.38.21.0/24]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[bigpond.net.au]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 203.36.0.0/14(-3.93), asn: 1221(-2.44), country: AU(0.01)]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bigpond.net.au,none]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2.21.38.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[bigpond.net.au]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[40.108.180.101.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:16:45 -0000 > On 14 Mar 2020, at 12:56 , Andrew Reilly = wrote: >=20 > By the way, the current Samba stable release is 4.12.0 (one week old) = and 4.11.0 was released last September. Is there some particular = incompatibility with FreeBSD that is keeping these out of Ports? I got = quite close to trying to build the newer version myself, but then the = problem went away... OK, I've just had a closer look at the several-dozen patch files, and = tried a couple of compilation attempts at 4.11.7, and concede that = getting this into shape is more work than I have time for today. Sigh. = Best of luck to the maintainer. Cheers, Andrew Reilly M: 0409-824-272 areilly@bigpond.net.au