From nobody Mon Nov 8 07:54:38 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7309184AF99 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 07:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hnk0d5q28z3tS7; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 07:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9021F7913; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 07:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AF5579B9DB; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:54:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:54:38 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: freebsd@ohreally.nl Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Message-ID: <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 08:36:54PM +0100, freebsd@ohreally.nl wrote: > Hello list, > > I have some questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg. I can find very > little documentation about that directory. /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg is mecanism to save old libraries, during upgrade, ensure programs still linked to those old libs continues to run It only happens if BACKUP_LIBRARIES is set to true (which is not the default). > > My current problem is that devel/boost-libs won't upgrade, with the > following message: > > No such file or directory @ rb_check_realpath_internal - > /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libboost_atomic.so.1 > > Actually, the mentioned file does exist. But it is a symlink to > libboost_atomic.so.1.72.0 which does not exist. So the file pointed does not exist > > So my first question is if I can just delete this dead symlink, in the hopes > that the upgrade will then succeed? Yes you can > > But I have some more questions. > > What exactly is this directory for? > The pkg.conf(5) man page states that libraries are backed up to this > directory (BACKUP_LIBRARY_PATH), but it doesn't say what these backups are > used for. Or when the backups should be restored. And when they can be > deleted. Pkg do not use them. > > Also, just above that line in the pkg.conf man page, it says that > BACKUP_LIBRARIES should be set to true to have libraries backed up. However, > it also says that this variable defaults to NO, and I never edited pkg.conf > (and I just checked: this var is not set in the default file). > So why does pkg back up these libraries anyway? > In my case, this directory contains about 30 libraries, and over twice that > amount in symlinks. What does pkg -vv shows you ? > > Thanks to anyone who can shine a light on this for me. > > Best, > Rob > > -- > :wq > > From nobody Mon Nov 8 08:52:33 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20646184A09F for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnlHB70Hqz4hXb; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 428C61DB270B; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:52:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636361541; r=y; bh=50aIidMs5oPRNQ59qKGvENhXAeZs4oupS+N6GuIc3JI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=Pxm9Wk3g8+w+ete0ORfr9/aQEAdxoRD5HxaE8LoOO6Fa5B2yNF3GLc8obdeeE5RVT tSyuKoO83Mdd2StSgis/mhzxq3kVq2+p4xdR7MielCaFq4Okv8oy7l5fig9YyTe4Ui QrOQVnIi46oOMAK6dzhL286wcdkUx2Bqj/BkSB6Q= Message-ID: <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:52:33 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Content-Language: nl To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> From: freebsd@ohreally.nl In-Reply-To: <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HnlHB70Hqz4hXb X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi Baptiste, Thank you for that; that's quite helpful. > /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg is mecanism to save old libraries, during upgrade, > ensure programs still linked to those old libs continues to run Okay. So just to be sure: after I have killed or restarted any programs that may be using these libraries, I can empty this directory? > What does pkg -vv shows you ? > pkg -vv | grep BACKUP BACKUP_LIBRARIES = false; BACKUP_LIBRARY_PATH = "/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg"; So I guess I found a bug. I'll create an issue at GitHub. Thanks much! Rob -- :wq From nobody Mon Nov 8 09:59:19 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA161848009 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnmmV0VwZz3Npg; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [176.31.115.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD45785C4; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 27F869BFA9; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:59:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:59:19 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: freebsd@ohreally.nl Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Message-ID: <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:52:33AM +0100, freebsd@ohreally.nl wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > Thank you for that; that's quite helpful. > > > /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg is mecanism to save old libraries, during upgrade, > > ensure programs still linked to those old libs continues to run > > Okay. > So just to be sure: after I have killed or restarted any programs that may > be using these libraries, I can empty this directory? > > > What does pkg -vv shows you ? > > > pkg -vv | grep BACKUP > BACKUP_LIBRARIES = false; > BACKUP_LIBRARY_PATH = "/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg"; > > So I guess I found a bug. > I'll create an issue at GitHub. > > Thanks much! > > Rob > It is weird I cannot reproduce locally for now. and I double check the code, I see no obvious mistake and on none of my freebsd setup /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg gets populated, beside the one where I explicitly set BACKUP_LIBRARIES to true! Are you sure you don't have a BACKUP_LIBRARIES env var which is setup ? Are you out of curiosity using portmaster? Best regards, Bapt From nobody Mon Nov 8 10:04:44 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86091184B351 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnmtR2dFfz3QYT; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1E0C1DB270B; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:04:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636365870; r=y; bh=gVidXUqenaXojm16Ejn+9U/sjXjTmk3Dtq9S9b+zYrA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=krEMt5bSuY1Nd/IHtlS86zICQD/XerRoSSPBhDLZG8xNCnB3RdCTLCp3blg1AYTBQ RIdPUoUnF1747pI2YgxNs+RIuiNd5TJK6IxAZEoIqK28nDgZx3G2cOeSWTwP9UaKjL jpFiTYCAJPFg4V/Rrt60cVu/4EWpMxuIh5nJQXvY= Message-ID: <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:04:44 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Content-Language: nl To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> From: freebsd@ohreally.nl In-Reply-To: <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HnmtR2dFfz3QYT X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 08/11/2021 10:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Are you sure you don't have a BACKUP_LIBRARIES env var which is setup ? Yes, I am sure. > Are you out of curiosity using portmaster? I always install from ports, and for upgrades I use portsnap/portupgrade. Should I direct my bug report elsewhere? (Since the directory is called pkg, and the only line of documentation I could find about this directory is in pkg.conf(5), I was sure pkg was the problematic application.) Rob -- :wq From nobody Mon Nov 8 13:18:53 2021 X-Original-To: pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08D018441BE for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnsBh6QP6z3mtY for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B8B123C5 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1A8DIqWH013893 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:18:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1A8DIqq1013892 for pkg@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:18:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253189] pkg(8) would ideally namespace its environment variables Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:18:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Package Infrastructure X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253189 Baptiste Daroussin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|portmgr@FreeBSD.org |pkg@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Baptiste Daroussin --- over to the right maintainer --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Mon Nov 8 14:58:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A811830A9F for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnvQF55tFz4qxM; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from [IPV6:2003:cd:5f1a:8b00:9131:dbe1:c009:1416] (p200300cd5f1a8b009131dbe1c0091416.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f1a:8b00:9131:dbe1:c009:1416]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FE2FAD97; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:58:53 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Content-Language: en-US To: freebsd@ohreally.nl Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> From: Stefan Esser In-Reply-To: <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------PYhzrk0P8GbaPUH8tS2eNNRz" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------PYhzrk0P8GbaPUH8tS2eNNRz Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------eh1ZLs3FtN0JL3qVjxjz8J70"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser To: freebsd@ohreally.nl Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> In-Reply-To: <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> --------------eh1ZLs3FtN0JL3qVjxjz8J70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 08.11.21 um 11:04 schrieb freebsd@ohreally.nl: > On 08/11/2021 10:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Are you sure you don't have a BACKUP_LIBRARIES env var which is setup = ? >=20 > Yes, I am sure. >=20 >> Are you out of curiosity using portmaster? >=20 > I always install from ports, and for upgrades I use portsnap/portupgrad= e. > Should I direct my bug report elsewhere? >=20 > (Since the directory is called pkg, and the only line of documentation = I could > find about this directory is in pkg.conf(5), I was sure pkg was the pro= blematic > application.) I do not know anything about portupgrade, but portmaster does offer to preserve shared libraries in the compat/pkg directory. But they are always copied by portzmaster, and therefore no dangling symbolic link can be created that way. And the backup is deleted again, if the upgrade installs a new library with the same name (i.e. if libA.so.5 has been copied to compat/pkg and the upgrade creates a new libA.so.5 in /usr/local/lib/libA.so.5, then the file in compat/pkg will be deleted - but if the upgrade brought a library named libA.so.6, the libA.so.5 file would persist and be availabl= e for ports that have not been re-compiled for libA.so.6). Regards, STefan --------------eh1ZLs3FtN0JL3qVjxjz8J70-- --------------PYhzrk0P8GbaPUH8tS2eNNRz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAmGJOy0FAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99UQk aQgAgXtcWcv8HDBYlm9D3bUwX67pZ+Io6XRO8x5bfumm08GXgrt3zpSh6nwh7gPNzgw0EHVYj12h o4kvfV7sJTvFfa6QslqRtlohfXRHwMeg84HEbFEkZFWO5ccuDuHCbFt/YqGfwxGGpArblUKHt0aE TFc8yrmFt4xpb8KH9RJVQo4Km+gYJZft6ru+LigZV6IaeL9BI1s0yocT99p3STeCbwULdcvMRcsl hcjWoZ5K2XR786ZJl2wrD4+SGZCXj8HXIL0qRvY/uq2a5md3JZyJnO6acPkinz6Yt0wPs5B989ju 7Zx0ImZbZ0kFj/PgTakVH8UvgYK2QcESX8bDD2FTFA== =Ro3p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------PYhzrk0P8GbaPUH8tS2eNNRz-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 15:03:56 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278731834DCF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnvWh6qBgz4sw3; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 064641DB270B; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:03:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636383823; r=y; bh=P00NRUeHxgExV63++JigLZL7MqRY+fk/A+9uQ+N4R/s=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=msd2KFuGeNomz6I7bG31WEsNEOVNL1ZOjxue10qTwURY4+0nsatYav8HSTgczrFaJ UU/t6uuiI6sJURxpoQ0XkAf1uJuLm3lU+cFbBVUdyWjaeVbHhPCkb6WzHgr71RBbdp DltIp2U3k3vLH9vGEHj3yfd0xa5foC5jIpsOO7DU= Message-ID: <668211f6-e7db-8875-1c1e-214ed2d4388c@ohreally.nl> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:03:56 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Content-Language: nl To: Stefan Esser Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> From: freebsd@ohreally.nl In-Reply-To: <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HnvWh6qBgz4sw3 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Thank you, Stefan. I am creating an issue at the portupgrade/pkgtools GitHub project as we speak. I will include all the information that Baptiste and you have given me. Best, Rob On 08/11/2021 15:58, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 08.11.21 um 11:04 schrieb freebsd@ohreally.nl: >> On 08/11/2021 10:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> Are you sure you don't have a BACKUP_LIBRARIES env var which is setup ? >> >> Yes, I am sure. >> >>> Are you out of curiosity using portmaster? >> >> I always install from ports, and for upgrades I use portsnap/portupgrade. >> Should I direct my bug report elsewhere? >> >> (Since the directory is called pkg, and the only line of documentation I could >> find about this directory is in pkg.conf(5), I was sure pkg was the problematic >> application.) > > I do not know anything about portupgrade, but portmaster does offer to > preserve shared libraries in the compat/pkg directory. > > But they are always copied by portzmaster, and therefore no dangling > symbolic link can be created that way. > > And the backup is deleted again, if the upgrade installs a new library > with the same name (i.e. if libA.so.5 has been copied to compat/pkg and > the upgrade creates a new libA.so.5 in /usr/local/lib/libA.so.5, then > the file in compat/pkg will be deleted - but if the upgrade brought a > library named libA.so.6, the libA.so.5 file would persist and be available > for ports that have not been re-compiled for libA.so.6). > > Regards, STefan > -- :wq From nobody Mon Nov 8 15:06:52 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B51F1834EED for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnvbM3PHdz4tNQ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C984B193; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EE4959C997; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:06:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:06:52 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: freebsd@ohreally.nl Cc: Stefan Esser , freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Message-ID: <20211108150652.5ckawymyfxdls4ys@aniel.nours.eu> References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> <668211f6-e7db-8875-1c1e-214ed2d4388c@ohreally.nl> List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <668211f6-e7db-8875-1c1e-214ed2d4388c@ohreally.nl> X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 04:03:56PM +0100, freebsd@ohreally.nl wrote: > Thank you, Stefan. > I am creating an issue at the portupgrade/pkgtools GitHub project as we > speak. I will include all the information that Baptiste and you have given > me. > > Best, > Rob > Just the "No such file or directory @ rb_check_realpath_internal" shows it comes from portupgrade and not pkg itself, I missed it in my first review. Note that portmaster and portupgrade do not need to support that feature anymore as it is provided by pkg directly (they just need to activate it or not if they wants for backward compatibility). Baptiste From nobody Mon Nov 8 16:28:57 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C373C1834721 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnxQ44zNYz3vMR; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from [IPV6:2003:cd:5f1a:8b00:9131:dbe1:c009:1416] (p200300cd5f1a8b009131dbe1c0091416.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f1a:8b00:9131:dbe1:c009:1416]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78ADAB6A7; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:28:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <624a7435-eaf3-03db-c47c-29783f45ede9@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:28:57 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Content-Language: en-US To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@ohreally.nl References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> <668211f6-e7db-8875-1c1e-214ed2d4388c@ohreally.nl> <20211108150652.5ckawymyfxdls4ys@aniel.nours.eu> From: Stefan Esser In-Reply-To: <20211108150652.5ckawymyfxdls4ys@aniel.nours.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------p1C68ghgx0Pm7xNLcu9VLsJJ" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------p1C68ghgx0Pm7xNLcu9VLsJJ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------c53r2AE0JnLEiU0dZtXmytr2"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@ohreally.nl Message-ID: <624a7435-eaf3-03db-c47c-29783f45ede9@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> <668211f6-e7db-8875-1c1e-214ed2d4388c@ohreally.nl> <20211108150652.5ckawymyfxdls4ys@aniel.nours.eu> In-Reply-To: <20211108150652.5ckawymyfxdls4ys@aniel.nours.eu> --------------c53r2AE0JnLEiU0dZtXmytr2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 08.11.21 um 16:06 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 04:03:56PM +0100, freebsd@ohreally.nl wrote: >> Thank you, Stefan. >> I am creating an issue at the portupgrade/pkgtools GitHub project as w= e >> speak. I will include all the information that Baptiste and you have g= iven >> me. >> >> Best, >> Rob >> >=20 > Just the "No such file or directory @ rb_check_realpath_internal" shows= it comes > from portupgrade and not pkg itself, I missed it in my first review. >=20 > Note that portmaster and portupgrade do not need to support that featur= e anymore > as it is provided by pkg directly (they just need to activate it or not= if they > wants for backward compatibility). Hi Baptiste, thank you for the information, I did not know about BACKUP_LIBRARIES. But I think that the functionality is somewhat different. Portmaster creates a copy of a local library before invoking "pkg delete" to keep it around for any ports that still depend on it. If a port is being upgraded and a library with the same name is installed to /usr/local/lib, the backup in compat/pkg will be deleted. AFAIUI, the effect of BACKUP_LIBRARIES, it has no effect on any command besides "pkg add", and it specifically does not protect against the remov= al of a shared library that is still required by some installed package. It does not appear to have any effect if "make install" is used to instal= l a port (since that only uses "pkg register", not "pkg add".) The pkg command could check whether any of the libraries to be deleted by "pkg delete" is still depended on by any other package (i.e. in the list generated by "pkg query %B") and then copy it to compat/pkg, if still being depended on. OTOH if a new package is installed, any library in compat/pkg that is in the list of newly installed libraries can be removed from compat/pkg. This is important, since I found that "ldconfig -m" tends to add newly created shared library locations to the end of the search path, and as a result if a shared library has been saved to compat/pkg, it will take precedence over a newly installed one. Therefore, removal of libraries from compat/pkg is required in that case, to make the newly installed libraries accessible. Regards, STefan PS: The documentation of BACKUP_LIBRARIES in pkg.conf(5) is not very precise. And this parameter could be added to the list of environment variables checked by "pkg add" in pkg-add(8). --------------c53r2AE0JnLEiU0dZtXmytr2-- --------------p1C68ghgx0Pm7xNLcu9VLsJJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAmGJUEkFAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99URw uAgAvlh7K1RqxWuGeUUxQVS70W4vhvhhgFUCZXNFAcwIijrRTulALobu47w7aCzxXWAqo750ZrXz 8GQzwTjf/6p14azdUN0kvx98280CiDZg7qDFfGovGhW70N19EbpZh/jpySb7cupMbQltgVz2G6dS m1+M1C3hGVLcoS4wUv3kt/k/Z3tR5KzB6Vf8QK6wBh+KQGP1CL84B0RG3/rLm+7doY4MNGDRHdFH z9slQ9j3VgzALCdjBOHL9scQEp/NWYPsCcfLIlXz0hV27NX4AHZcnsREKato7LcEdnfHqyRSq8bY wZZpwOMsCwMGH15AyVT5W5VBEG0tW+0xqNvzYmvt1Q== =sd8A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------p1C68ghgx0Pm7xNLcu9VLsJJ-- From nobody Mon Nov 8 16:59:34 2021 X-Original-To: pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E4C18468B1 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hny5M1L6jz4bSk for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA18D151DF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1A8GxYfv036255 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:59:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1A8GxYSa036254 for pkg@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:59:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232412] Keywords/sample.ucl: Hide "You may need to manually remove XYZ..." during upgrades Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:59:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232412 Baptiste Daroussin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #4 from Baptiste Daroussin --- it is fixed in the latest ports tree --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Mon Nov 8 17:54:49 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CCA1845FCC for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from rambler.ohreally.nl (rambler.ohreally.nl [51.15.8.63]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HnzJr2wyzz4vgZ for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ohreally.nl) Received: from authenticated-user by rambler.ohreally.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15CD11DB270B for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:54:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ohreally.nl; s=dkim; t=1636394075; r=y; bh=V6iySfHznUs2x536sF/7Jl1rmMQWH4mvQLuYstoVCog=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=mZEUzuDw08/eKsTY5Akw+89n9o5cU3jN9Vq4sCMSViAWrLCqkL8Ex1NjkPFeMoOgN 6fzPfjQ9ij0YlNm3EBIjerO+NKag2WfNU554CxDgqDXnPVEedXLlyxp/mvTUv2JVA8 DOuvHpCHyMh0pckIENJ0UmMAu8hoaQjC2pA25qOI= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:54:49 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Content-Language: nl To: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> From: freebsd@ohreally.nl In-Reply-To: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.0 at rambler.ohreally.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HnzJr2wyzz4vgZ X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ohreally.nl header.s=dkim header.b=mZEUzuDw; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@ohreally.nl designates 51.15.8.63 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@ohreally.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.45 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ohreally.nl:s=dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.95)[0.953]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ohreally.nl]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.999]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ohreally.nl:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:51.15.0.0/17, country:FR]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I have shot all the info into the portupgrade issue tracker. https://github.com/freebsd/portupgrade/issues/73#issuecomment-963344629 Sorry to have wasted your time. On 07/11/2021 20:36, freebsd@ohreally.nl wrote: > Hello list, > > I have some questions about /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg. I can find very > little documentation about that directory. > > My current problem is that devel/boost-libs won't upgrade, with the > following message: > > No such file or directory @ rb_check_realpath_internal - > /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libboost_atomic.so.1 > > Actually, the mentioned file does exist. But it is a symlink to > libboost_atomic.so.1.72.0 which does not exist. > > So my first question is if I can just delete this dead symlink, in the > hopes that the upgrade will then succeed? > > But I have some more questions. > > What exactly is this directory for? > The pkg.conf(5) man page states that libraries are backed up to this > directory (BACKUP_LIBRARY_PATH), but it doesn't say what these backups > are used for. Or when the backups should be restored. And when they can > be deleted. > > Also, just above that line in the pkg.conf man page, it says that > BACKUP_LIBRARIES should be set to true to have libraries backed up. > However, it also says that this variable defaults to NO, and I never > edited pkg.conf (and I just checked: this var is not set in the default > file). > So why does pkg back up these libraries anyway? > In my case, this directory contains about 30 libraries, and over twice > that amount in symlinks. > > Thanks to anyone who can shine a light on this for me. > > Best, >   Rob > -- :wq From nobody Sat Nov 13 09:39:01 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2DB1840405 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:39:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdpkg@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hrr4q6TSFz4cPq for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdpkg@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (unknown [10.10.10.36]) by poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B964026A for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 10:39:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.10.34] (poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by poseidon.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CAA8401E8 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 10:39:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3e452727-1933-7cf9-99af-2e4a821e1206@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 10:39:01 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org From: Tilly Subject: mysql80-server-8.0.26_1 is vulnerable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Hrr4q6TSFz4cPq X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bsdpkg@cloudzeeland.nl designates 82.176.127.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bsdpkg@cloudzeeland.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.31 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cloudzeeland.nl]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.990]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15542, ipnet:82.176.0.0/16, country:NL]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Dear team(s), Perhaps I missed something here, but for some weeks I get these messages about the latest packages we are running with. As far as I can check, their port(s) have been updated. Can you pls check and let us know how to solve? Detecting package vulnerabilities vulnxml file up-to-date mysql80-server-8.0.26_1 is vulnerable: MySQL -- Multiple vulnerabilities CVE: CVE-2021-35618 CVE: CVE-2021-35623 CVE: CVE-2021-35625 CVE: CVE-2021-35633 CVE: CVE-2021-35640 CVE: CVE-2021-35613 CVE: CVE-2021-35584 CVE: CVE-2021-35632 CVE: CVE-2021-35639 CVE: CVE-2021-35624 CVE: CVE-2021-35622 CVE: CVE-2021-35546 CVE: CVE-2021-35637 CVE: CVE-2021-35630 CVE: CVE-2021-35647 CVE: CVE-2021-35646 CVE: CVE-2021-35645 CVE: CVE-2021-35644 CVE: CVE-2021-35643 CVE: CVE-2021-35642 CVE: CVE-2021-35641 CVE: CVE-2021-35638 CVE: CVE-2021-35636 CVE: CVE-2021-35635 CVE: CVE-2021-35634 CVE: CVE-2021-35575 CVE: CVE-2021-35629 CVE: CVE-2021-35628 CVE: CVE-2021-35627 CVE: CVE-2021-35626 CVE: CVE-2021-35631 CVE: CVE-2021-35648 CVE: CVE-2021-35596 CVE: CVE-2021-35591 CVE: CVE-2021-35537 CVE: CVE-2021-2479 CVE: CVE-2021-2478 CVE: CVE-2021-35577 CVE: CVE-2021-35602 CVE: CVE-2021-35608 CVE: CVE-2021-35612 CVE: CVE-2021-35604 CVE: CVE-2021-2471 CVE: CVE-2021-35621 CVE: CVE-2021-35598 CVE: CVE-2021-35594 CVE: CVE-2021-35593 CVE: CVE-2021-35592 CVE: CVE-2021-35590 CVE: CVE-2021-2481 CVE: CVE-2021-35607 CVE: CVE-2021-35597 CVE: CVE-2021-35610 CVE: CVE-2021-35583 CVE: CVE-2021-36222 CVE: CVE-2021-22926 CVE: CVE-2021-3711 CVE: CVE-2021-22931 WWW:https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/c9387e4d-2f5f-11ec-8be6-d4c9ef517024.html Packages that depend on mysql80-server: mysql80-client-8.0.26_1 is vulnerable: MySQL -- Multiple vulnerabilities CVE: CVE-2021-35618 CVE: CVE-2021-35623 CVE: CVE-2021-35625 CVE: CVE-2021-35633 CVE: CVE-2021-35640 CVE: CVE-2021-35613 CVE: CVE-2021-35584 CVE: CVE-2021-35632 CVE: CVE-2021-35639 CVE: CVE-2021-35624 CVE: CVE-2021-35622 CVE: CVE-2021-35546 CVE: CVE-2021-35637 CVE: CVE-2021-35630 CVE: CVE-2021-35647 CVE: CVE-2021-35646 CVE: CVE-2021-35645 CVE: CVE-2021-35644 CVE: CVE-2021-35643 CVE: CVE-2021-35642 CVE: CVE-2021-35641 CVE: CVE-2021-35638 CVE: CVE-2021-35636 CVE: CVE-2021-35635 CVE: CVE-2021-35634 CVE: CVE-2021-35575 CVE: CVE-2021-35629 CVE: CVE-2021-35628 CVE: CVE-2021-35627 CVE: CVE-2021-35626 CVE: CVE-2021-35631 CVE: CVE-2021-35648 CVE: CVE-2021-35596 CVE: CVE-2021-35591 CVE: CVE-2021-35537 CVE: CVE-2021-2479 CVE: CVE-2021-2478 CVE: CVE-2021-35577 CVE: CVE-2021-35602 CVE: CVE-2021-35608 CVE: CVE-2021-35612 CVE: CVE-2021-35604 CVE: CVE-2021-2471 CVE: CVE-2021-35621 CVE: CVE-2021-35598 CVE: CVE-2021-35594 CVE: CVE-2021-35593 CVE: CVE-2021-35592 CVE: CVE-2021-35590 CVE: CVE-2021-2481 CVE: CVE-2021-35607 CVE: CVE-2021-35597 CVE: CVE-2021-35610 CVE: CVE-2021-35583 CVE: CVE-2021-36222 CVE: CVE-2021-22926 CVE: CVE-2021-3711 CVE: CVE-2021-22931 WWW:https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/c9387e4d-2f5f-11ec-8be6-d4c9ef517024.html Packages that depend on mysql80-client: 2 problem(s) in 2 installed package(s) found. --- end of text --- Thanks, Jos Chrispijn From nobody Sat Nov 13 13:56:54 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C781858DB0 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 13:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HrxpM0GVJz3HTp; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 13:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from [IPV6:2003:cd:5f2e:2500:641c:9d5d:c1a5:e4b] (p200300cd5f2e2500641c9d5dc1a50e4b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f2e:2500:641c:9d5d:c1a5:e4b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 762B62D4CE; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 13:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4119af9a-f330-ca89-dc61-c28b7abcc247@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 14:56:54 +0100 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: BACKUP_LIBRARIES issue Content-Language: de-DE From: Stefan Esser To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> <668211f6-e7db-8875-1c1e-214ed2d4388c@ohreally.nl> <20211108150652.5ckawymyfxdls4ys@aniel.nours.eu> <624a7435-eaf3-03db-c47c-29783f45ede9@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <624a7435-eaf3-03db-c47c-29783f45ede9@freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------ysqe4KvPVnfevYalNO3020qG" X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------ysqe4KvPVnfevYalNO3020qG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------3cyLmxNXlPnnSfZEEbX9H2bH"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <4119af9a-f330-ca89-dc61-c28b7abcc247@freebsd.org> Subject: BACKUP_LIBRARIES issue References: <15967907-03dc-a2ab-df86-6097d8d808f6@ohreally.nl> <20211108075438.jtqkak6n22n5rlg7@aniel.nours.eu> <9df3553b-b2c3-6b35-f06c-f123b981a613@ohreally.nl> <20211108095919.wfqj3kr2m6du5xsr@aniel.nours.eu> <9ea022cc-0886-6bfe-4f5c-993b2a683e3e@ohreally.nl> <4d28dae0-043f-dffd-ce79-644ee6e226e0@freebsd.org> <668211f6-e7db-8875-1c1e-214ed2d4388c@ohreally.nl> <20211108150652.5ckawymyfxdls4ys@aniel.nours.eu> <624a7435-eaf3-03db-c47c-29783f45ede9@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <624a7435-eaf3-03db-c47c-29783f45ede9@freebsd.org> --------------3cyLmxNXlPnnSfZEEbX9H2bH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Following up on my previous mail, since libraries saved to compat/pkg jus= t broke Samba on my system after an upgrade: $ ldconfig -r search directories: /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg:/u= sr/local/lib/compat:/usr/local/lib/dovecot:/usr/local/lib/expect5.45.4:/u= sr/local/lib/gcc10:/usr/local/lib/gcc9:/usr/local/lib/graphviz:/usr/local= /lib/mysql:/usr/local/lib/mysql/plugin:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.32/mach/COR= E:/usr/local/lib/pth:/usr/local/lib/qt5:/usr/local/lib/samba4:/usr/local/= lib/signon:/usr/local/lib/signon/extensions:/usr/local/lib/wine:/usr/loca= l/llvm10/lib:/usr/local/llvm11/lib:/usr/local/llvm12/lib:/usr/local/llvm1= 3/lib:/usr/local/llvm70/lib:/usr/local/llvm80/lib:/usr/local/llvm90/lib:/= usr/local/share/chromium:/usr/local/share/code-oss:/usr/local/share/elect= ron12 Since /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg is the 5th element in the search path, /usr/local/lib/samba4 the 17th, the same-name libraries in the compat/pkg= directory take precedence over the newly installed libraries in the samba4 directory. Since paths are added to the search list at the end, when new packages are installed, lib/compat/pkg may end up in the middle of the search path, even when it was at the end at boot time. I see 2 possible solutions: 1) Make sure that compat library paths come last (e.g. by adding a new option letter to specify compat library paths: ldconfig -b compat/pkg)= =2E Or special-case compat paths in ldconfig to implicitly add them only a= t the end of a search path (without requiring a new option letter). 2) Make the pkg command remove libraries from the compat/pkg directory if a same-name library is installed in some other system directory. Without such a safe-guard, software that installs libraries with internal= interface version numbers/checks under the same name as previous incompat= ible versions (e.g. samba, dovecot, ...) will fail to start. Am 08.11.21 um 17:28 schrieb Stefan Esser: > Am 08.11.21 um 16:06 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 04:03:56PM +0100, freebsd@ohreally.nl wrote: >>> Thank you, Stefan. >>> I am creating an issue at the portupgrade/pkgtools GitHub project as = we >>> speak. I will include all the information that Baptiste and you have = given >>> me. >>> >>> Best, >>> Rob >>> >> >> Just the "No such file or directory @ rb_check_realpath_internal" show= s it comes >> from portupgrade and not pkg itself, I missed it in my first review. >> >> Note that portmaster and portupgrade do not need to support that featu= re anymore >> as it is provided by pkg directly (they just need to activate it or no= t if they >> wants for backward compatibility). > Hi Baptiste, >=20 > thank you for the information, I did not know about BACKUP_LIBRARIES. >=20 > But I think that the functionality is somewhat different. Portmaster > creates a copy of a local library before invoking "pkg delete" to keep > it around for any ports that still depend on it. >=20 > If a port is being upgraded and a library with the same name is > installed to /usr/local/lib, the backup in compat/pkg will be deleted. >=20 > AFAIUI, the effect of BACKUP_LIBRARIES, it has no effect on any command= > besides "pkg add", and it specifically does not protect against the rem= oval > of a shared library that is still required by some installed package. > It does not appear to have any effect if "make install" is used to inst= all > a port (since that only uses "pkg register", not "pkg add".) >=20 > The pkg command could check whether any of the libraries to be deleted > by "pkg delete" is still depended on by any other package (i.e. in the > list generated by "pkg query %B") and then copy it to compat/pkg, if > still being depended on. >=20 > OTOH if a new package is installed, any library in compat/pkg that is > in the list of newly installed libraries can be removed from compat/pkg= =2E >=20 > This is important, since I found that "ldconfig -m" tends to add newly > created shared library locations to the end of the search path, and as > a result if a shared library has been saved to compat/pkg, it will take= > precedence over a newly installed one. Therefore, removal of libraries > from compat/pkg is required in that case, to make the newly installed > libraries accessible. >=20 > Regards, STefan >=20 > PS: The documentation of BACKUP_LIBRARIES in pkg.conf(5) is not > very precise. And this parameter could be added to the list of > environment variables checked by "pkg add" in pkg-add(8). >=20 --------------3cyLmxNXlPnnSfZEEbX9H2bH-- --------------ysqe4KvPVnfevYalNO3020qG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAmGPxCYFAwAAAAAACgkQR+u171r99US6 kwgArLjJLJKCmCQzb+bPFkBurYUL1iFSLktPOMWREdcqDEg5OaDujDCWHrLiIFGTXo6ztBdYUOdg 5CPv5eVxRUz8od1wMMB/DVJjCbzYCdW0vAs3830fpZn4SZGjw5RT5bX9oMMQUVnvCBon1dnhLwv6 NvQe6zuUrezffyf2IbpwfTK+SvaSPTA0pMs5IFMrPSK/RQTvS/XZxkxEijbgPKzE/KCe/Rmwu1fX Y1PqftQ7oVlvNOMlnOsflqFX5WDdjOKRwho3R6FiqaxPR8sBEumiGlpV9MUDDw7AC7OA/B4vBfnt AKVWI53gVvrtbhvIDNGmR2lILRbKpC+j9Uaz4MjUyQ== =DDQJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------ysqe4KvPVnfevYalNO3020qG-- From nobody Sun Nov 14 21:00:04 2021 X-Original-To: pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBE21839D07 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hsl850xh8z4RNt for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9812524C for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AEL04UQ017654 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:00:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1AEL04BN017653 for pkg@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:00:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202111142100.1AEL04BN017653@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for pkg@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:00:04 +0000 List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16369236045.71EC4.16889" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --16369236045.71EC4.16889 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:00:04 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- Open | 220049 | ports-mgmt/pkg installs unneeded packages Open | 237369 | ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg delete removes required NLS d New | 256415 | ports-mgmt/pkg throws "Failed: extract" error in Open | 219036 | ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg confused, installs older ver 4 problems total for which you should take action. --16369236045.71EC4.16889--