Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:29:42 -0800
From:      "Dan Mahoney (Ports)" <freebsd@gushi.org>
To:        Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
Cc:        Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>, "Hartmann, O." <ohartmann@walstatt.org>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: On 14-CURRENT: no ports options anymore?
Message-ID:  <1A50C846-307F-4DBE-AECD-2A71547D3C91@gushi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1uPRi00ErNVf9zNhJsgAgND_7%2BP3-=WSWieOhToV6z4-A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20210313201702.5f9dfa9b@hermann.fritz.box> <8a39cc8f-df2b-8a43-54c4-44eebb4b12de@madpilot.net> <3779241B-6501-45A5-A63C-7A10DC9FDBF0@gushi.org> <CAN6yY1uPRi00ErNVf9zNhJsgAgND_7%2BP3-=WSWieOhToV6z4-A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You mention release notes.  Slightly off-topic, but I never understood =
why, if there was a beta or RC available, the release-notes of the time =
weren=E2=80=99t available on www.freebsd.org <http://www.freebsd.org/>.

Wouldn=E2=80=99t that make sense to see if there were things you wanted =
to try out and test?

Anyway, more on topic, it seems that if one is on -CURRENT (or possibly =
-STABLE), you=E2=80=99re building from source, and should be expected to =
read UPDATING.  That much is on the site.  (But that would be /usr/src, =
not /usr/ports).

Did this happen mid-line in a stable?  That=E2=80=A6shouldn=E2=80=99t.

-Dan

> On Mar 13, 2021, at 3:48 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 2:51 PM Dan Mahoney (Ports) =
<freebsd@gushi.org>
> wrote:
>=20
>> If this isn=E2=80=99t at least in /usr/ports/UPDATING it sure should =
be.
>>=20
>> -Dan
>>=20
> Ditto! While it did not take me long to discover that the ncurses =
shareable
> had bumped the version, I wasted a lot of time rebuilding ports one by =
one.
> At least a heads-up would have been nice. The way to do this is =
unclear,
> though, as it was a base library update. I assume that it only bit =
those
> running current or 13. Those running 13-STABLE, as I was, had no =
warning.
> I'm not sure a note in UPDATING would have been appropriate, but a =
post to
> stable@ and current@ would have been nice. Or, did I miss them?
>=20
> This would also be made VERY clear in the 13.0 Release Notes. I =
suspect
> installing misc/compat12x would have worked.
> --
> Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
> E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1A50C846-307F-4DBE-AECD-2A71547D3C91>