From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 5 07:34:53 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16D66762A1 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 07:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olgeni@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hub.olgeni.com (hub.olgeni.com [31.171.246.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H2NbK1k7tz4ph6 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 07:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olgeni@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (94-36-151-155.adsl-ull.clienti.tiscali.it [94.36.151.155]) by hub.olgeni.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 191C4D791E for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 09:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 09:34:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Jimmy Olgeni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Locating ZFS checksum errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-OpenPGP-KeyID: 0xFCDB3E82F778D8D7 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: EE37 B427 91C5 7707 EC54 064A FCDB 3E82 F778 D8D7 X-OpenPGP-URL: http://hub.olgeni.com/~olgeni/pgp/olgeni@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H2NbK1k7tz4ph6 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50837, ipnet:31.171.244.0/22, country:CH]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 07:34:53 -0000 On Sat, 4 Sep 2021, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > I tried to get a detailed log from zdb with all the DVAs and checksums, but I > could not find any match. I restored some random files (a few package builds) and the errors went away.. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 5 11:37:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09F5679397 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 11:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H2Tzj57JPz3GqX for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 11:37:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id e26so2505053wmk.2 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 04:37:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=oIGWUzZh/MYgBVwDK2U618jP84oXrse2vC1nxWJHztM=; b=qIDLZ9GnCj0cOItq6T9eJonb8ovo7us1nTIRoeSS+5aU9KQGw6RyObi60wvxSoHLJv ia8xEg14ivVWTEpgsTxDNp+GJjKyspTxU4k3DBFGQxyOkO5KDc5QeT5y8LDMjyk5TmKX duzIq+NNwqmNt75h4ciSpok8KhjgdgEXQ2CfquHv9uECcdmAX9C2g/HlQHbwUxDtd463 DN03z6KPXuuW+14HrFJXYCeaXo4EjUocdY+Mp3iQogMiAULNLky7GV2bLdx179Z0NJul pRUu+B3BT80x+doQIEjZFQSI9Fk5W5dUipgLXmS+JacKcoZd5xm/n73xl/AMUtsSZJJ4 27jA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=oIGWUzZh/MYgBVwDK2U618jP84oXrse2vC1nxWJHztM=; b=Y+sG7w5DB9jnYl62SvfS+f9EFm2haKd0Zd9PIAE7jF9y3sOV8MmUwLLlAnnLriN41B 7Qd/5ILNEFI61fvXCTuhOyKPcFsMY0rNwU9cwMwhFMD6qbxi4mgkzaUfyWfQrXMhnlqb SYstWZISibEJjQ5uDD8XTTc67Y2iMnFXKrkViuxAEV4cAN6Ro8bDN9M+ZG0yE/Xedml8 uHcgtL9Uv1aLx+jKo9+IfP9/zFy2AHyL1zod/jBOXPJedeTap4zuvZUTol7i+j0RCthb 0bZ+P4NRTtlnQlygc9rfsbrfKBR201mQ4b3BzMcnldQoJcZuBqtKL3AkST2KXidjgFN+ yJ3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Evc3hhvPxXQ7xX8gnSoi5+vZCdeT264UDvQg+eIXlPy62wZ65 SqE6xO4PVkY4Wd0CyHWWxHhOmAGII2dRXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxS1r9hOfZ3uTOlM835Z5KkN8nOEd0HyfL88g10bi0fVcqqd8m083gO/eZTHhDQy35dVvJe2A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4686:: with SMTP id t128mr6663167wma.183.1630841865344; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 04:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:1f1c:a0::2? (tunnel642390-pt.tunnel.tserv1.lon2.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:1f1c:a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm3847950wrc.11.2021.09.05.04.37.44 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Sep 2021 04:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: zdb: error 97 reading (was: Locating ZFS checksum errors) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 12:37:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H2Tzj57JPz3GqX X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qIDLZ9Gn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::336 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::336:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 11:37:54 -0000 On 05/09/2021 08:34, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > I restored some random files (a few package builds) and the errors > went away.. I also got a series of errors in response to zdb -bcsvL If I recall correctly, all with the string: Got error 97 reading Are these definitely checksum errors, or can read errors (with code 97) occur in other situations? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 5 18:37:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C8667F984 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 18:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from havard@sorli.no) Received: from asav22.altibox.net (asav22.altibox.net [109.247.116.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H2gHd3ntHz3Nw3 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 18:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from havard@sorli.no) Received: from [192.168.43.39] (2.150.188.158.tmi.telenormobil.no [2.150.188.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: havard.sorli@lifi.no) by asav22.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B7A420AA9 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:37:08 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SMOldmFyZCBTw7hybGk=?= Subject: freebsd-update fetch install - runs the update, but still report old release Message-ID: <1d95d8e1-6133-e765-a004-ecf7ba6f2414@sorli.no> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:37:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: nb-NO Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=NPX7BXyg c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=BtU3RuSq/l56b6+2a+/NrA==:117 a=BtU3RuSq/l56b6+2a+/NrA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=zhXYap0rg5ZfNYV5tm0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H2gHd3ntHz3Nw3 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of havard@sorli.no designates 109.247.116.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=havard@sorli.no X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.75 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DATE_IN_PAST(1.00)[29]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[109.247.116.9:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:109.247.0.0/16]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.16)[-0.161]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sorli.no]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[2.150.188.158:received]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.71)[subject]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29695, ipnet:109.247.112.0/21, country:NO]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 18:37:18 -0000 I run updates ( freebsd-update fetch install ) and looks like it's fine. (reports sucessfull update to new release). I reboot and uname report the old version. Any clue? ( I think it should report "11.4-RELEASE-p13" ) before reboot : freebsd@xyz:~ % freebsd-version -k ; uname -r 11.4-RELEASE-p9 11.4-RELEASE-p9 After reboot : freebsd@xyz:~ % sudo freebsd-update fetch install src component not installed, skipped Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 2 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 11.4-RELEASE from update2.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 11.4-RELEASE-p13. No updates are available to install. freebsd@xyz:~ % freebsd-version -k ; uname -r 11.4-RELEASE-p9 11.4-RELEASE-p9 freebsd@xyz:~ % sysctl kern.securelevel kern.securelevel: -1 freebsd@ns2:~ % sudo freebsd-update fetch src component not installed, skipped Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 2 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 11.4-RELEASE from update2.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 11.4-RELEASE-p13. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 5 19:33:32 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940C666070C for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 19:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d40002e0a04a.6dde17408cf889309fbf2546d5e13b73@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H2hXW4zQrz3vZ9 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 19:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d40002e0a04a.6dde17408cf889309fbf2546d5e13b73@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1630870412; x=1633462412; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=Z8boOWnhcKIRy1owdOlFml0SLQaB0ysWKr/3ZpdLSTo=; b=POSsSBHxKXg4oEBYfOkKYX21dfFeTevDRGtb9zGKJdwm3qkiv9PamAJzjK4M5mpHq8nBbMFHT3M5teARWJGJB0WYNArmbA9tgrfM27IIN/hTCXJBDKU0PKrHFBSvzWHxbBPdjtXX3EeRkAgo6yLu0QpFV2d17UlLVDQIyu+MaOA= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xZDRkNDAwMDJlMGEwNGEuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r1.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r1.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.191.1]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sun, 5 Sep 2021 15:33:17 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r1.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sun, 5 Sep 2021 15:33:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mMxtC-000DGj-Tr; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 20:33:14 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:33:14 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: =?UTF-8?B?SMOldmFyZCBTw7hybGk=?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update fetch install - runs the update, but still report old release Message-Id: <20210905203314.76ef8cc0ecc8712a98af3b0f@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <1d95d8e1-6133-e765-a004-ecf7ba6f2414@sorli.no> References: <1d95d8e1-6133-e765-a004-ecf7ba6f2414@sorli.no> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H2hXW4zQrz3vZ9 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=POSsSBHx; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4d40002e0a04a.6dde17408cf889309fbf2546d5e13b73@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4d40002e0a04a.6dde17408cf889309fbf2546d5e13b73@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.191.1:received]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d40002e0a04a.6dde17408cf889309fbf2546d5e13b73@email-od.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d40002e0a04a.6dde17408cf889309fbf2546d5e13b73@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 19:33:32 -0000 On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:37:27 +0200 Håvard Sørli wrote: > freebsd@xyz:~ % freebsd-version -k ; uname -r > 11.4-RELEASE-p9 > 11.4-RELEASE-p9 So what does freebsd-version -u say ? Chances are there are no kernel changes between p9 and p13. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 5 20:30:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9AE66077A for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@tinka.africa) Received: from the-host.tinka.africa (the-host.tinka.africa [105.22.37.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H2jnz1bP7z4gYh for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@tinka.africa) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tinka.africa; s=tinka; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To :MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BMkPI4BidWTCLiWcJn5Y/oIhKPSOw+GXApfxwL7/Tzk=; b=WzBUWkGTNMNSSUizkh7eK1Izte VpW2tjol6hz9RT1Q4rLWe0/CJkA8or0JLM6JVpUTP7zYgZ+OZlDO4D5SivioAHaskXTnkq0XZhcAq k0xVCw9bMvo1CZKRgwrL7A6/VPsbhk0GBHpEDT2tyzRU0eCsPSK985UbXpwer4RDBw2llbaHiE5Y/ A1eID0q2+9vA/mNl8BN34GSHe/PCC8dYtWpi9AmEv3yRwnvudhMdjD0kS4gMA+b0WPoa1HvOb53fM 11RJa21BmFZfVfDjupn+Ytnot0jkzJlhQvOfnqgPOtaVhnZ04jdUFpAZAv4y1/sdgNh4GvsQNMU+8 xcHzEhHA==; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=Marks-MacBook-Pro.local) by the-host.tinka.africa with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id QYZAA3-000NKM-83 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 22:30:03 +0200 Subject: Re: freebsd-update fetch install - runs the update, but still report old release To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1d95d8e1-6133-e765-a004-ecf7ba6f2414@sorli.no> <20210905203314.76ef8cc0ecc8712a98af3b0f@sohara.org> From: Mark Tinka Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 22:30:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210905203314.76ef8cc0ecc8712a98af3b0f@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H2jnz1bP7z4gYh X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tinka.africa header.s=tinka header.b=WzBUWkGT; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tinka.africa; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mark@tinka.africa designates 105.22.37.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mark@tinka.africa X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tinka.africa:s=tinka]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mark]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:105.22.37.14]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tinka.africa:+]; HFILTER_HELO_2(1.00)[the-host.tinka.africa]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tinka.africa,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:37100, ipnet:105.16.0.0/12, country:MU]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 20:30:16 -0000 On 9/5/21 21:33, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > So what does freebsd-version -u say ? Chances are there are no > kernel changes between p9 and p13. Saw this a lot. Nothing to worry about. The system is up-to-date. Just that you had no kernel changes between patch levels. Mark. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 5 20:34:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D90466144B for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from holgerdanske.com (holgerdanske.com [IPv6:2001:470:0:19b::b869:801b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "holgerdanske.com", Issuer "holgerdanske.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H2jtJ6J2zz4hl5 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holgerdanske.com; s=nov-20210719-112354; t=1630874030; bh=3ykuZDm2qu3UDbDnihVVrY+jLMI83WqhyJ2/y1VsXsA=; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=X1U7HCItrVX1KXQkhvHu0D1Yjgm/QRtqP9qrqVCJC3qBNROVlouVbvFDKcvf9gbVQ YtDm9dAbi/X2cmJbPwqNOw2OOEccm5FRnpLONUUGslnb3XOcmnogOOD4XL04aJ9WMS IJhfenDUl9j24szMnv6zyev628nIryjTmKi6ek/2x7wyUnnM8W6Z+sJWtJ6BhqDQlV X9AMZbTmoxTxbNDfhO5v1OFAUKHfI8DryOFvG191bwis1nMyotZjn22tP8/8xAr7Jq +zCP8UtMZUjkvE0M/upGIA/Q4PKQCLVxW3pkTRi9jARIy5fFxLT2ISnTbGx766obh/ UgT0n2NiEDBCs9oDJvOE2CIe6LCXGbz1q2eL8OKcTzBUnJ4kp2z6AsRrKDTxsG8ZIk pzweR66zeIZa1rfJYbC+cWNuRljkAxK3MfI8ShUUzJsiWsmGVMZkpx88sfpGD0VGWc xH+DvJV5LWQrVe1JCSeXrQcfQm+9qejVw2FGUoOTRaxVE9Tc0UoevJrfG6g7eaq0Yk ap5JdxLLWOY36QyZ0EQlkSU7t2E3rE4P3vudbKPGuatSfSX3XsKbXIhYhG1z/QcpQP 67jMtFJ/FOC2ahoT1EjO0p/pnD5LjQgjP7D9jLsagfJ/HTZycZFbRNUsHifzGVybJE 4IU7I3LPVNjlrx439jk4E6J0= Received: from 99.100.19.101 (99-100-19-101.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net [99.100.19.101]) by holgerdanske.com with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:TLSv1.3:Kx=any:Au=any:Enc=AESGCM(128):Mac=AEAD) (SMTP-AUTH username dpchrist@holgerdanske.com, mechanism PLAIN) for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 13:33:50 -0700 Subject: Re: Locating ZFS checksum errors To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: David Christensen Message-ID: <36a79a52-54cd-0d45-264e-43d108612846@holgerdanske.com> Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 13:33:45 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H2jtJ6J2zz4hl5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=holgerdanske.com header.s=nov-20210719-112354 header.b=X1U7HCIt; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=holgerdanske.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dpchrist@holgerdanske.com designates 2001:470:0:19b::b869:801b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dpchrist@holgerdanske.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.89 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[holgerdanske.com:s=nov-20210719-112354]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:november.he.net]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.11)[0.114]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[holgerdanske.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[holgerdanske.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 20:34:02 -0000 On 9/4/21 2:56 AM, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > > Hi, > > Short version of the story: due to a bad RAM stick I managed to collect some > checksum errors on a ZFS pool; they are not reported by a scrub, but show up > when running "zdb -bcsvL". > > They look like this: > > capacity operations bandwidth ---- errors ---- > description used avail read write read write read write cksum > rpool 469G 451G 1.65K 0 146M 0 0 0 0 > mirror 469G 451G 1.65K 0 146M 0 0 0 0 > /dev/gpt/pool1 843 0 73.0M 0 0 0 98 > /dev/gpt/pool0 842 0 73.1M 0 0 0 98 > > A few of them are logged during the scan: > > zdb_blkptr_cb: Got error 97 reading <404, 0, 1, 17> DVA[0]=<0:e0956e000:6000> DVA[1]=<0:1200c25000:6000> [L1 DMU dnode] fletcher4 lz4 unencrypted LE contiguous unique double size=20000L/6000P > birth=7322L/7322P fill=5419 cksum=743743d4a15:652404d7275bf1:349b01108bcc58b4:6eb5731a7332a4d1 -- skipping > Now, how do I find out which files (or whatever else) are affected, in order to > fix them? :) > > I tried to get a detailed log from zdb with all the DVAs and checksums, but I > could not find any match. On 9/5/21 4:37 AM, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 05/09/2021 08:34, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > >> I restored some random files (a few package builds) and the errors >> went away.. How did you determine which files to restore? David From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 5 16:13:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions+confunsub-3cef654808e2badf@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7961067DC85 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 16:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren.henderson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H2c5T5V9fz3nLH for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 16:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren.henderson@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id eb14so5882657edb.8 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:13:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9v01watHSulwNsydJu1TRe6PTKIgf0Xh24ShjlOFDPE=; b=FaqbWs77G1sy443k7wBywkTsqyBA0AkELgX7n4QDKrzO+dM8aT37Ba/TLjqNE7n3As dwLiwOFoMAyNXUsEAifKweSu3ZYPqo3N+7d7YLyKZKLpaqBYBN9VRK+6eDe443Lykk97 niLsB4oJ2aL6yzfdr3yZK+rzCpyKqUYuLgJGiVyPxrgnGpmywcvmKDHl9nK7FVLovHWl 0thSOisxCYbFaNBRCOqZ6BYvKuDvU4UV2IR3gUafO2FhUa9TWYBBlnrTz16NbQWdxIdn IM/iDYQJ3/v6Dh8qc2uRTZMvj1+m/iUCHJSBjj7uhG2jS0hQ/ZlpXFNc6mtcIrUsCxYC HHmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=9v01watHSulwNsydJu1TRe6PTKIgf0Xh24ShjlOFDPE=; b=JA/82EBYti2AQZncQ1DD8GtyMqOAmM18p1I5VJUxvl+HCbMEq8z8Yhq+5s0XxyNXqh iZJJXkXDWmOkLC8vTSsWB5isSxv9DR/lqIYEx3fRadCfZQdtt8/W1TWea13e26BX5jet 0Wwy1yWBiV/TtBNQP0RvVyZnjGKDTkiAkPV16iPrcZatm63AxjDCfSyXj9D/U5IoPX3d SGShbl/b2ZxqSWY85DDGFsnjuJsFJ6dePIaKJVRhNiw/mBCpmHcsAfF4tPM+StZlS5y/ OcO698W5XynT1bYP1/Av1Y5ckAMwcOkg3OUMucNzfUQrOjcOGbp52U1miOAernxnyw3p wLJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KjApfGMF6J6qhMq/khVeb5kwNgVnWnUS8ULz26ngNjagNsO8j KKtDqm30n70FDJjZm6PuXYTh9bkCKxIpFdHba7d+nL+X X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLILgN4qbwfw9picDDUULARgW6/Xk+BBHjnmHY8HrjhDhEFimU/Se7g5mpJQA1zFnNwZinDiJmABrVfn05qvs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:344f:: with SMTP id l15mr9208577edc.56.1630858388356; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1630858265-55673-mlmmj-2be3c6fb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1630858265-55673-mlmmj-2be3c6fb@FreeBSD.org> From: Darren Henderson Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 12:12:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Confirm unsubscribe from freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-questions+confunsub-3cef654808e2badf@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H2c5T5V9fz3nLH X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=FaqbWs77; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darrenhenderson@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::530 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=darrenhenderson@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[confunsub-3cef654808e2badf]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::530:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:24:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 16:13:18 -0000 do it On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 12:11 PM wrote: > Hi, this is the Mlmmj program managing the > mailing list. > > An administrator has requested that the email address > be removed from the list. > > To confirm you want to do this, please send a message to > which can > usually be done simply by replying to this message. The subject and the > body of the message can be anything. > > After doing so, you should receive a reply informing you that the operation > succeeded. > > If you do not want to do this, simply ignore this message. > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Sep 6 09:35:07 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795D66713D9 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H33CY5hXvz4c23 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1eb63c40 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d5815232 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1bb56db0 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ba007a25 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 05:34:49 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: devcpu-data Message-ID: <20210906053449.54bbcb5d@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H33CY5hXvz4c23 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 09:35:07 -0000 Hi! I hava the AMD processor and I am a little confused about setting microcode. I the instructions stay: "To enable updates using the first method, add the following lines to the system's /boot/loader.conf: cpu_microcode_load=3D"YES" cpu_microcode_name=3D"/boot/firmware/intel-ucode.bin" This method will not load the microcode update until the system is rebooted. To enable updates using the second method, add the following line to the system's /etc/rc.conf: microcode_update_enable=3D"YES" Then, to ensure the update is applied, reboot the system or start the microcode update service via: # service microcode_update start" How is for AMD processor. Is it the same because devcpu-data instal for amd in share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd.bin share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam16h.bin share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam17h.bin /boot/firmware/intel-ucode.bin Thank you. --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Sep 6 09:36:56 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A01F67193E for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (pppoe-static.82.209.221.201.telecom.mogilev.by [82.209.221.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H33Fg64DMz4c2l for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) From: Outlook Team To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Your Outlook Account is out of storage Date: 6 Sep 2021 12:36:48 +0300 Message-ID: <20210906123648.C37BB12CDA33C646@freebsd.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H33Fg64DMz4c2l X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6697, ipnet:82.209.192.0/18, country:BY] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 09:36:56 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Sep 6 15:41:46 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B2B6770F2 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mglazer2014@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H3CLf0jnmz4gWf for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mglazer2014@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id s16so7206020ilo.9 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:41:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ROcOG2Ak1Tixm490JZacI+uubDyaV2cfLlnAhUe3tQM=; b=dOf1XEPgqY2nuy4ooWwHUBRZvaOP7sQwmO7yU3242P2V1BS37Q7ncuKxU3V0mg2K6L aaUHc16sRLVLjGF9X1UYUabQfARQOM35JdFSZpg20XOcgdpmkUWBRBb4CoAYjd6C3/6Q cRpbhw0QStPSTawSoBhtBnkrGemiKNegUr+va/R/p7QV8VjySUyqSENY4YSzjISudSx7 4XQcOKqtv23s0MJ2t7z5lbRblgAKFoD+/HRFP9prlfY8+OSzg3Y4h4yOILsrIfvEBNl3 zDN8tOIvIN7Qp77METMXao1X75HgbMZ/s/od/iDl3ms2hAL5ZE21drexwXh9LdpIiuXD nxqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ROcOG2Ak1Tixm490JZacI+uubDyaV2cfLlnAhUe3tQM=; b=eJfZAaLLJdBej2YmDnkFL5qb40lvhjUHJFic3P/Ju8NHmAKNP/vLKo28nQxQRaga/a QE8Ov9eHorXcF7KWYmKz/GHUrTH31YcyMCzDYSfaNVYT/SkvZbmIHRDfpwi6ji3BIlkx vHlfRfNcE8FIRTzUJbHyePTLYnya99YKkywF9O7FD1wE48jfc1GQGWT4ahXj8lHxRtmd cGy8ZxzDhJ6tjyEohG5dicS09ix7DaADaJ7RypFwdBXIdig0q8bnWtshgDXMbyd6+FZB C/ovKPNvBefSSKLkk3egmQsxp+/WrFPwEAhxCSDOH/8K6a8GqXW0dBu+vO3LrsmeEyBq VlPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MNTvFpnVj9AuKwVezaTUqM6OvWZkEv/WGNMistA4Wnmiuljlw WWf73ZrcNFJRzzivqYIMHjluhtZqkXY4kJ7F4vbb/SKJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIlmHY4IywpUzDi1Wpr7mtEEs03oLU9r9zGgObdBZ2oSSnBUj+K7vx1aJn2eZuhEc+FsZrhvjUFa++CyP60qY= X-Received: by 2002:a92:cb12:: with SMTP id s18mr8205777ilo.32.1630942905072; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:41:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210906123648.C37BB12CDA33C646@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20210906123648.C37BB12CDA33C646@freebsd.org> From: Martin Glazer Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:41:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Your Outlook Account is out of storage To: Outlook Team X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3CLf0jnmz4gWf X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=dOf1XEPg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mglazer2014@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mglazer2014@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::131:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.997]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:41:46 -0000 get stuffed On Mon, Sep 6, 2021, 2:37 AM Outlook Team wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Sep 6 18:22:51 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D9C67925D for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 18:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H3GwV1mtRz4pMM for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 18:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CB779678B70; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 18:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1490679163 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 18:22:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H3GwR3ZMQz4pMC for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 18:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1630952561; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=kXlct3Fmqk4KZADJhPn5JgSTtdc=; b=sahjTT3Pz5ZatgGKs+0wn7ostPwrt0+a5JSChFqstKuw/aWf0WKCouKCTAzRfh+Y dzzPb7JzccicoBTKBTlbaWQA/jDbDCCpjhd+GNr9janaN8nVYsJcc8/dp30sxfk2 ozVGEAyDgdtlja19n4Rkcur0q7V03gqpXHHypGBGfS1bWBOqIZXXxdkpJzNViM2v zt7cpWTp1+/AWTWy0qzpxTqKFojpaI6fYsZy6yoj7gsflELIzKcfU0eUaohGKDqg 9mRG1KJYYGzUHpcZhOMTmW+RUcWNV750h6wdNk750zFFtKmMsJlZbZNILzbSUuI7 GALjteo68Kcf5VFOyu0IRw==; X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [130.44.129.206] ([130.44.129.206:35815] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 00/99-27899-17C56316; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:22:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <24886.23664.511786.9701@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:22:40 -0400 From: Robert Huff To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: interface initialization error? X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 27.2 (amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) X-Vade-Verdict: clean X-Vade-Analysis-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeffedguddvgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhr X-Vade-Analysis-2: ohhfihhlvgemucfujgfpteevqfftpdftvefppdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecunecu X-Vade-Analysis-3: jfgurhepgggtgffkfffhvffuofesthejredtredtvdenucfhrhhomheptfhosggvrhhtucfjuhhffhcu X-Vade-Analysis-4: oehrohgsvghrthhhuhhffhesrhgtnhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudefudegteeiledu X-Vade-Analysis-5: fefhiedtffetkeegjefhkeeukeegveffkeelvdejvdelgeefnecukfhppedufedtrdeggedruddvledr X-Vade-Analysis-6: vddtieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedufedtrdeggedruddv X-Vade-Analysis-7: ledrvddtiedphhgvlhhopehjvghruhhsrghlvghmrdhlihhtthgvrhgrthhushdrohhrghdrlhhithht X-Vade-Analysis-8: vghrrghtuhhsrdhorhhgpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprhhosggvrhhthhhufhhfsehrtghnrdgtohhmpdhr X-Vade-Analysis-9: tghpthhtohepqhhuvghsthhiohhnshesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghdphhhoshhtpehsmhhtphdrrhgt X-Vade-Analysis-10: nhdrtghmhhdrshihnhgrtghorhdrtghomhdpshhpfhepnhgvuhhtrhgrlhdpughkihhmpedpnhgspghr X-Vade-Analysis-11: tghpthhtohepuddptehuthhhqdgfshgvrheprhhosggvrhhthhhufhhf X-Vade-Client: RCN X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3GwR3ZMQz4pMC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=sahjTT3P; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[69.168.97.78:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com:dkim]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[69.168.97.78:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 18:22:51 -0000 On a system running: 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #0 main-d6327ae8c1: Sun Jan 24 14:16:54 EST 2021 amd64 with this as the network card: em0: port 0xe800-0xe83f mem 0xfebe0000-0xfebfffff irq 21 at device 6.0 on pci3 for some time now I've been getting this: debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from em0 (ifp 0xfffff80002628000), ignoring. (which didn't used to happen) when I boot the system. That's the only related message, and the inferface works as expected ... but in the spirit of zealous paranoia I'd like to find out what might have changed and whether I have something to worry about. Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 03:44:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3CF6A80EA for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:44:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H3WN227QGz4v2q; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB8238D01; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:6d82:a7f1:a80:4b83] (unknown [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:6d82:a7f1:a80:4b83]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2069FA39C; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 20:43:52 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Mel Pilgrim Subject: Strange errors from poudriere-pkgclean Message-ID: <0987a7e8-e556-d04e-55df-7b81a6491f2a@bluerosetech.com> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 20:43:51 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3WN227QGz4v2q X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:relay3.brtsvcs.net]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 03:44:03 -0000 Hacking about in the ports tree tonight and I got this: # # poudriere pkgclean -n -a -j pas-releng-12 -p preprod -O localports -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/build-list [...] [00:01:28] Calculating ports order and dependencies [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-emacs-2.15.0 from audio/timidity++-emacs -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-motif-2.15.0 from audio/timidity++-motif -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-emacs-2.15.0 [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-slang-2.15.0 from audio/timidity++-slang -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-gtk-2.15.0 from audio/timidity++-gtk -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-slang-2.15.0 [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-motif-2.15.0 [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-xskin-2.15.0 from audio/timidity++-xskin -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-gtk-2.15.0 [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-xskin-2.15.0 [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-xaw-2.15.0 from audio/timidity++-xaw -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:28] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for audio/timidity++ processing package timidity++-xaw-2.15.0 [00:01:32] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for textproc/reflex processing package vile-9.8u from editors/vile -- Is SUBDIR+=reflex missing in textproc/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:32] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for textproc/reflex processing package xvile-9.8u from editors/xvile -- Is SUBDIR+=reflex missing in textproc/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:32] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for lang/tolua++ processing package stratagus-2.4.2_1 from games/stratagus -- Is SUBDIR+=tolua++ missing in lang/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:32] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for lang/tolua++ processing package wyrmgus-5.0.1 from games/wyrmgus -- Is SUBDIR+=tolua++ missing in lang/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:32] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for lang/tolua++ processing package cegui-0.8.7_17 from graphics/cegui -- Is SUBDIR+=tolua++ missing in lang/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:33] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package ja-mypaedia-fpw-package-1.0.7_10 from japanese/mypaedia-fpw-package -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:33] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for audio/timidity++ processing package ja-timidity++-slang-2.15.0 from japanese/timidity++-slang -- Is SUBDIR+=timidity++ missing in audio/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:33] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for audio/timidity++ processing package ja-timidity++-slang-2.15.0 [00:01:34] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for graphics/png++ processing package nn-insight-1.0.5_1 from misc/nn-insight -- Is SUBDIR+=png++ missing in graphics/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:35] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for net/p5-NetPacket processing package netleak-0.1a_2 from net-mgmt/netleak -- Is SUBDIR+=p5-NetPacket missing in net/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:35] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for net/p5-NetPacket processing package netleak-0.1a_2 [00:01:35] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for net/p5-NetPacket processing package p5-Net-Analysis-0.41_1 from net/p5-Net-Analysis -- Is SUBDIR+=p5-NetPacket missing in net/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:35] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for net/p5-NetPacket processing package p5-Net-Analysis-0.41_1 [00:01:35] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for net/p5-NetPacket processing package p5-POE-Component-Pcap-0.04_1 from net/p5-POE-Component-Pcap -- Is SUBDIR+=p5-NetPacket missing in net/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:35] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for net/p5-NetPacket processing package p5-POE-Component-Pcap-0.04_1 [00:01:36] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for net/yaz++ processing package yazproxy-1.3.9_2 from net/yazproxy -- Is SUBDIR+=yaz++ missing in net/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:37] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for net/p5-NetPacket processing package sqlninja-0.2.6 from security/sqlninja -- Is SUBDIR+=p5-NetPacket missing in net/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:37] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for net/p5-NetPacket processing package sqlninja-0.2.6 [00:01:42] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup pkgname for devel/rubygem-json_schema processing package rubygem-nanoc-core-4.11.19 from www/rubygem-nanoc-core -- Is SUBDIR+=rubygem-json_schema missing in devel/Makefile and does the port provide the '' FLAVOR? [00:01:42] Error: compute_deps_pkg failed to lookup PKGNAME for devel/rubygem-json_schema processing package rubygem-nanoc-core-4.11.19 [00:01:45] Error: Fatal errors encountered calculating dependencies Did I break something, or did I just find work to do? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 14:00:01 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846AD665A05 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H3n2m4Z9Xz4ZTC; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:00:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mNbBJ-000JmH-VM; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 07:30:33 -0600 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 07:30:33 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Openssl 3.0.0 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3n2m4Z9Xz4ZTC X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+a:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_VIRUSFREE_BOTNET(2.00)[204.209.81.1:from]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 14:00:01 -0000 Openssl 3.0.0 is out. In ports, will we have a new port for openssl3 ? Also will openssl 3 be integrated into the next kernels? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Canada on 20 Sept 2021 vote ! Beware https://mindspring.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 16:05:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3A5668107 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serpent7776@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H3qqd19dCz3C21 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serpent7776@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id l18so17340160lji.12 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a+G0GnQ++b8rWP7x2j7jyJAbGYinXIIbj0g2u6fIycc=; b=IjTzAvE1B926VLtNH2znGQLQj8zRJwsFPgC7zortTFYAIhp1+wudS3/iVYuQ8wxWjv zngE6eAgvryFnfLSVT7d1q/hcnX1uMbGT7GkeSUfniwYs4PDIZdwfTCedjN3PeRWNei1 GyLO7GVsTb9b5mwrv12RQNezIW7SkYsVzdGJxQWcyUn9on6MpIFMQRFqN3DFLk6MtpjA +/AlJrKBzh3Zz8tOw+6kZjddz11QdBxIW412bhXDvFZ/PQdc1qP1t5tTlAFXN0pBxIjs lPEo2stRU3GEsxTIEuTa7uBx6EM0ZOc6gyInffwVQMtw+4AJBdHe7Vffv7sdm1Iw/lZm uMSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a+G0GnQ++b8rWP7x2j7jyJAbGYinXIIbj0g2u6fIycc=; b=osLBH6p+VI5uoImzzLJ6ybQGKxo8uPK3hmINvSPCcThU/1m1mG17En5kbSRqdvMY2y C+KkLvKhl/MZaF9frAYeRYp44vVaVnpsUXgTzC0c1fnaR3VGzt2YlSPDO8tn+MMx1z7k 60RSAMZQlac75d4bDaho9RRMT/Y5atkfyCEiW+rSxk/sOLKSAnx9nLdnsWJ3P01N4Wi6 nrWHUqbSLjgJfkli1Mzo+SnQfztWvawL1Gi3faM9vleggVTig7amIhwjId8cXNNYI2IV 23J+l9wqR76FwbH4CDYO/FeHTFNmlHwH3UfUN3gmlLm9Z7mU1m8XYB4S8I/iustDDOvW g+iQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302vdmCB2f+CZlifpZz5J9A/SLhpeQ1syh9Vzyd6B+CRIe/tbci M9UBfoM6BayH0AEA0GSlsSWynP/a9LY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3/x7JY4m7RiWlrpydboIqJXHs2+mHv4TdOBKeMCNXEt9czjYr/K6DNxV/OrHzOPJteNkP9w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:10ba:: with SMTP id k26mr14745935ljn.319.1631030731959; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DaemONX (90-156-31-193.internetia.net.pl. [90.156.31.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c17sm1035842lfb.257.2021.09.07.09.05.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:04:21 +0200 From: Serpent7776 To: LuMiWa via freebsd-questions Cc: LuMiWa Subject: Re: devcpu-data Message-ID: <20210907180421.7cff9217@DaemONX> In-Reply-To: <20210906053449.54bbcb5d@dismail.de> References: <20210906053449.54bbcb5d@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3qqd19dCz3C21 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=IjTzAvE1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of serpent7776@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=serpent7776@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.46 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.956]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::229:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 16:05:33 -0000 On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 05:34:49 -0400 LuMiWa via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi! > > I hava the AMD processor and I am a little confused about setting > microcode. I the instructions stay: > [...] > To enable updates using the second method, add the following line to > the system's /etc/rc.conf: > > microcode_update_enable="YES" > > How is for AMD processor. Is it the same because devcpu-data instal for > amd in > > > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd.bin > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam16h.bin > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam17h.bin > /boot/firmware/intel-ucode.bin > > Thank you. > I also have AMD and I'm using second method from quite a while, so microcode_update_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf I'm pretty sure it was working, but now I don't see relevant entries in `dmesg`, so I'm not sure anymore. No idea about the first method. -- /* * Serpent7776 */ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 21:35:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C528766D921 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H3z8Z3ghpz4j5L for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 80591eeb for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eb79de5f for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d60ccf92 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 92dab6cc (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:35:30 -0400 From: LuMiWa To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devcpu-data Message-ID: <20210907173530.2c30a636@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20210907180421.7cff9217@DaemONX> References: <20210906053449.54bbcb5d@dismail.de> <20210907180421.7cff9217@DaemONX> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3z8Z3ghpz4j5L X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.46.223.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 21:35:43 -0000 On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:04:21 +0200 Serpent7776 wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 05:34:49 -0400 > LuMiWa via freebsd-questions wrote: >=20 > > Hi! > >=20 > > I hava the AMD processor and I am a little confused about setting > > microcode. I the instructions stay: > > [...] > > To enable updates using the second method, add the following line to > > the system's /etc/rc.conf: > >=20 > > microcode_update_enable=3D"YES" > >=20 > > How is for AMD processor. Is it the same because devcpu-data instal > > for amd in > >=20 > >=20 > > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd.bin > > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin > > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam16h.bin > > share/cpucontrol/microcode_amd_fam17h.bin > > /boot/firmware/intel-ucode.bin > >=20 > > Thank you. > >=20 > I also have AMD and I'm using second method from quite a while, so >=20 > microcode_update_enable=3D"YES" >=20 > in /etc/rc.conf >=20 > I'm pretty sure it was working, but now I don't see relevant entries > in `dmesg`, so I'm not sure anymore. >=20 > No idea about the first method. >=20 Thank you very much. --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 22:26:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0208A66E513 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 22:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from freeport.safeport.com (freeport.safeport.com [147.160.157.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H40Gw5mHCz3CBQ for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 22:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by freeport.safeport.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAC9EB4A2 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:17:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:17:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Doug Denault To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: zfs newbie Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H40Gw5mHCz3CBQ X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of doug@safeport.com does not designate 147.160.157.114 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=doug@safeport.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.43 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all:c]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.47)[0.473]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.959]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[safeport.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6405, ipnet:147.160.157.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:26:18 -0000 Following the default 12.2 zfs install I got one pool (zroot) and a dataset for each of the traditional mount points. So zfs list shows: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zroot 279G 6.75T 88K /zroot zroot/ROOT 1.74G 6.75T 88K none zroot/ROOT/default 1.74G 6.75T 1.74G / zroot/tmp 176K 6.75T 176K /tmp zroot/usr 277G 6.75T 88K /usr zroot/usr/home 276G 6.75T 276G /usr/home zroot/usr/ports 88K 6.75T 88K /usr/ports zroot/usr/src 670M 6.75T 670M /usr/src zroot/var 47.5M 6.75T 88K /var zroot/var/audit 88K 6.75T 88K /var/audit zroot/var/crash 88K 6.75T 88K /var/crash zroot/var/log 820K 6.75T 820K /var/log zroot/var/mail 46.3M 6.75T 46.3M /var/mail zroot/var/tmp 88K 6.75T 88K /var/tmp I had consultant configure another server for us. He set up the disk array with one dataset. so zfs list on this system give: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zroot 2.65G 13.2T 2.62G legacy >From a sysadmin view I rather like the multiple datasets. Are there advantages to one over the other? _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com support@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 23:01:11 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E527866EBCF for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (mail.geeks.org [IPv6:2001:4980:3333:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H413C0SQLz3hDY for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by after-clamsmtpd.geeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01604B149 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:01:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id E6758B148; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:01:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:01:03 -0500 From: Doug McIntyre To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs newbie Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H413C0SQLz3hDY X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of merlyn@geeks.org designates 2001:4980:3333:1::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=merlyn@geeks.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[geeks.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7753, ipnet:2001:4980::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 23:01:12 -0000 On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:17:45PM -0400, Doug Denault wrote: > Following the default 12.2 zfs install I got one pool (zroot) and a dataset for > each of the traditional mount points. So zfs list shows: > > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > zroot 279G 6.75T 88K /zroot > zroot/ROOT 1.74G 6.75T 88K none > zroot/ROOT/default 1.74G 6.75T 1.74G / > zroot/tmp 176K 6.75T 176K /tmp > zroot/usr 277G 6.75T 88K /usr > zroot/usr/home 276G 6.75T 276G /usr/home > zroot/usr/ports 88K 6.75T 88K /usr/ports > zroot/usr/src 670M 6.75T 670M /usr/src > zroot/var 47.5M 6.75T 88K /var > zroot/var/audit 88K 6.75T 88K /var/audit > zroot/var/crash 88K 6.75T 88K /var/crash > zroot/var/log 820K 6.75T 820K /var/log > zroot/var/mail 46.3M 6.75T 46.3M /var/mail > zroot/var/tmp 88K 6.75T 88K /var/tmp .. > From a sysadmin view I rather like the multiple datasets. Are there advantages > to one over the other? One huge one I use all the time... You can set quotas per dataset. For me, /var/log gets 4G (typically). Depending on the usecase, /tmp and /var/tmp may get quotas, but I wouldn't go blindly do that. Other things you can do is if you carve your database storage out of zroot, then you can set tuned ZFS parameters for your database file system areas. (ie. blocksize matching, compression/dedup setup, etc). From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 23:49:27 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10766FAC7 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H426v2TVVz3wTX; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:41:642b:600::6]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8CB938D01; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 23:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:6d82:a7f1:a80:4b83] (unknown [IPv6:2602:41:642b:630:6d82:a7f1:a80:4b83]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77DD7B4B5; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Strange errors from poudriere-pkgclean To: Bryan Drewery , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0987a7e8-e556-d04e-55df-7b81a6491f2a@bluerosetech.com> From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <427a75d9-af55-b453-c01a-dbc4c21b5575@bluerosetech.com> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:49:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H426v2TVVz3wTX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 23:49:27 -0000 On 2021-09-07 13:59, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/6/2021 8:43 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: >> Hacking about in the ports tree tonight and I got this: >> >> # # poudriere pkgclean -n -a -j pas-releng-12 -p preprod -O localports >> -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/build-list > > What files are in the localports overlay? Something from that is > confusing the SUBDIR list for the categories. > > I suspect that you have audio/something in your overlay but no > audio/Makefile with SUBDIR listings for the added things. The overlay doesn't have an audio dir in it, just ports-mgmt and dns. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 8 01:28:44 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B853671F23 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from holgerdanske.com (holgerdanske.com [184.105.128.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "holgerdanske.com", Issuer "holgerdanske.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H44KQ6Xpgz3FLb for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holgerdanske.com; s=nov-20210719-112354; t=1631064512; bh=fqUi1/21pQGc8A9K88nx73olr/c+IYcgrPbhXosO5AI=; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IH8lVAp6+MjasRsuTsPT3TbMJ4e7xX57F/EuBJcxQDKRU32+NEJoRgAqwGav6G1Tm 9avVzrmcvjIjj/nBKKdy1N2TRBC6Uxsk92c3LTnPtwKMSWbw2Op4db7UPGZBLf9Ads K6EyZWusPUe0M9Z5nwQAtawnvMZpM9D//cKQvSzPn0YnOOrOJWBioDwYK7FWmjX0Es pj/9m7rx/tPJLXbMyFGNiym/FHmXqci9JbnkjXwT3C+L7QdUna283As/7ExChNtQEd CnoSMnddf2yNdca/9O3O1gfsyTJ6LOqWkP70NmkrGULy24H539rAl8aF6eUujmPQWM 4TGZo4p9OeTtDfcskD0zKIx9yixudmky1FxRSelpO9jrPauYvS/VZsOiGcDQveVwsN eT3zsTKu81ZjUn6KpM+PMlfb3u7p+A5fJ3LxnpYqKyNlGtkyapQnS525DaAxQzP4UP cvlszr18aWXV2MHjDRKvMwdbaR3hyuoSTFvLORZKgiyW7bghRjyrjJoBWCO4+pQdCY u2LdLBhWpD1tu8Ne6edTQZehgsepQvU07MkbmCRkvUIwPhElcU/48L3vo8cgyp3LYD 9+etQY7yVtAegyQrLNxvTJUVssyb0mcF6GWumgO7E8bay8hrsW9/2Jx5u41r7lDEoO LeQf5ZcsQjPvSRJrtcYHM8LY= Received: from 99.100.19.101 (99-100-19-101.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net [99.100.19.101]) by holgerdanske.com with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:TLSv1.3:Kx=any:Au=any:Enc=AESGCM(128):Mac=AEAD) (SMTP-AUTH username dpchrist@holgerdanske.com, mechanism PLAIN) for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:28:32 -0700 Subject: Re: zfs newbie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: David Christensen Message-ID: <8c1c61d2-2b55-ae46-3304-9bfdcd6bd2d1@holgerdanske.com> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:28:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H44KQ6Xpgz3FLb X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=holgerdanske.com header.s=nov-20210719-112354 header.b=IH8lVAp6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=holgerdanske.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dpchrist@holgerdanske.com designates 184.105.128.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dpchrist@holgerdanske.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.95 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[holgerdanske.com:s=nov-20210719-112354]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[holgerdanske.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[holgerdanske.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.947]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:184.104.0.0/15, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 01:28:44 -0000 On 9/7/21 3:17 PM, Doug Denault wrote: > > Following the default 12.2 zfs install I got one pool (zroot) and a > dataset for each of the traditional mount points. So zfs list shows: > > NAME                 USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT > zroot                279G  6.75T    88K  /zroot > zroot/ROOT          1.74G  6.75T    88K  none > zroot/ROOT/default  1.74G  6.75T  1.74G  / > zroot/tmp            176K  6.75T   176K  /tmp > zroot/usr            277G  6.75T    88K  /usr > zroot/usr/home       276G  6.75T   276G  /usr/home > zroot/usr/ports       88K  6.75T    88K  /usr/ports > zroot/usr/src        670M  6.75T   670M  /usr/src > zroot/var           47.5M  6.75T    88K  /var > zroot/var/audit       88K  6.75T    88K  /var/audit > zroot/var/crash       88K  6.75T    88K  /var/crash > zroot/var/log        820K  6.75T   820K  /var/log > zroot/var/mail      46.3M  6.75T  46.3M  /var/mail > zroot/var/tmp         88K  6.75T    88K  /var/tmp > > I had consultant configure another server for us. He set up the disk > array with one dataset. so zfs list on this system give: > > NAME    USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT > zroot  2.65G  13.2T  2.62G  legacy > > From a sysadmin view I rather like the multiple datasets. Are there > advantages to one over the other? I have a SOHO LAN with one primary FreeBSD 12.2 server (CVS and Samba) and various Windows, macOS, iOS, and Debian clients. As another reader mentioned, you can set ZFS properties differently on different datasets. You can also apply different disaster preparedness/ recovery policies to different datasets -- e.g. snapshots and replication. However, more datasets means more work and more complexity. Few of the standard ZFS CLI tools work recursively on nested datasets. For example, how to do you make a tree of 10 nested datasets read-only with one shell command? Or, make them read-write? Or, replicate them to another pool? Or do today's backup replication job when datasets have been added, removed, and/or renamed since yesterday's? Or, selectively destroy old snapshots? Performing these use-cases by hand is tedious and error prone. Automating them is non-trivial. I would estimate the system administration complexity of nested ZFS datasets as O(N*log(N)). But, my primary comment on your ZFS listings is that you put root on a 6.75T pool (!) and your consultant put root on a 13.2T pool (!). It is my practice to keep my OS instances small enough to fit onto a single "16 GB" device, and to put my data on RAID in a file server. This allows me to quickly, easily, and reliably take and restore raw binary images of the OS devices. How are you going to backup and restore your OS images? David From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 8 07:19:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DF9675DD8 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 07:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d400031da493.42e540c80f0f984291eede6affcf2069@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H4D5f6VXnz4XrG for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 07:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d400031da493.42e540c80f0f984291eede6affcf2069@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1631085543; x=1633677543; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=6AkR48Y2RKjJo2e7h0b+xjICQUdJyJih1T48vXbhW50=; b=gNjgtRZFVoBvo5VGzewDqf1kSE17BU/ae5SEHosBNK4ewctPtAm8wxoPx4X42ekcMIMSe8mHOawx2fEQ0XAGxCuKR6s2cAEhU7rPUKQlji0OcTtolKsH5rjcJqXgKpx1JV5mgxndo/yYAFXuVDUN76CaVFtGMfvKtCXRjSeVVlA= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xZDRkNDAwMDMxZGE0OTMuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r1.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r1.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.191.1]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 03:18:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r1.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 03:18:47 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mNrr4-000BWb-79; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:18:46 +0100 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:18:46 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: David Christensen Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs newbie Message-Id: <20210908081846.02fc2284933dd581081b39dc@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <8c1c61d2-2b55-ae46-3304-9bfdcd6bd2d1@holgerdanske.com> References: <8c1c61d2-2b55-ae46-3304-9bfdcd6bd2d1@holgerdanske.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4D5f6VXnz4XrG X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=gNjgtRZF; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4d400031da493.42e540c80f0f984291eede6affcf2069@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4d400031da493.42e540c80f0f984291eede6affcf2069@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.191.1:received]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d400031da493.42e540c80f0f984291eede6affcf2069@email-od.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d400031da493.42e540c80f0f984291eede6affcf2069@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 07:19:03 -0000 On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:28:28 -0700 David Christensen wrote: > It is > my practice to keep my OS instances small enough to fit onto a single > "16 GB" device, and to put my data on RAID in a file server. This > allows me to quickly, easily, and reliably take and restore raw binary > images of the OS devices. I strongly recommend this practice - using a mirrored pair for the OS device is even better, you can even mirror to an iscsi exported zvol on the file server in a pinch (ie. laptops) but recovery is fiddly. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 8 12:45:45 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5389F67A975 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de) Received: from smh-06.1blu.de (smh-06.1blu.de [178.254.0.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H4MLc3djKz3jfs for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de) Received: from [172.16.29.5] (helo=sh4-5.1blu.de) by smh-06.1blu.de with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNwxM-0003n0-6i; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:45:36 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by sh4-5.1blu.de with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNwxM-0001I1-3r; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:45:36 +0200 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:45:36 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: monitoring incoming mailbox in console mode Message-ID: <20210908124536.GA17@sh4-5.1blu.de> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r314251 (amd64) X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text. User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4MLc3djKz3jfs X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de has no SPF policy when checking 178.254.0.206) smtp.mailfrom=ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.20 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[guru@unixarea.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RBL_SENDERSCORE(2.00)[178.254.0.206:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[unixarea.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[178.254.0.206:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[guru@unixarea.de,ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42730, ipnet:178.254.0.0/19, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[guru@unixarea.de,ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:45:45 -0000 Hello, I want to monitor my mailbox below /var/mail/... when the system is only running in console mode, i.e. w/o X11 and KDE desktop. On new mail, i.e. when the last modified date of the mbox file is changing, it should produce the normal BEL signal. Do we have something in ports before I write my own script? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176-38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub May, 9: Спаси́бо освободители! Thank you very much, Russian liberators! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 7 21:56:17 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0864366DD72 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@safeport.com) Received: from freeport.safeport.com (freeport.safeport.com [147.160.157.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H3zcJ0CtNz4p0B for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@safeport.com) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by freeport.safeport.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C997AEB22C; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:50:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:51:05 -0400 (EDT) From: DTD To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: zfs newbie Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3zcJ0CtNz4p0B X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of support@safeport.com does not designate 147.160.157.114 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=support@safeport.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.34 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all:c]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.84)[0.838]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[safeport.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6405, ipnet:147.160.157.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-Spam: Yes X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:52:17 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 21:56:17 -0000 Following the default 12.2 zfs install I got one pool (zroot) and a dataset for each of the traditional mount points. So zfs list shows: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zroot 279G 6.75T 88K /zroot zroot/ROOT 1.74G 6.75T 88K none zroot/ROOT/default 1.74G 6.75T 1.74G / zroot/tmp 176K 6.75T 176K /tmp zroot/usr 277G 6.75T 88K /usr zroot/usr/home 276G 6.75T 276G /usr/home zroot/usr/ports 88K 6.75T 88K /usr/ports zroot/usr/src 670M 6.75T 670M /usr/src zroot/var 47.5M 6.75T 88K /var zroot/var/audit 88K 6.75T 88K /var/audit zroot/var/crash 88K 6.75T 88K /var/crash zroot/var/log 820K 6.75T 820K /var/log zroot/var/mail 46.3M 6.75T 46.3M /var/mail zroot/var/tmp 88K 6.75T 88K /var/tmp I had consultant configure another service for us. He set up the disk array with one dataset. so zfs list on this system give: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zroot 2.65G 13.2T 2.62G legacy >From a sysadmin view I rather like the multiple datasets. Are there advantages to one over the other? _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com support@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 8 15:12:00 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CEF67C8D9 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from mailout.qeng-ho.org (mailout.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H4QbM3qNKz3LNF for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:64c9:1::2]) by mailout.qeng-ho.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ADF98DFD; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:11:52 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: zfs newbie To: Doug Denault , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:11:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4QbM3qNKz3LNF X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@qeng-ho.org designates 217.155.128.244 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@qeng-ho.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.155.128.240/29]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[qeng-ho.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.989]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13037, ipnet:217.155.0.0/16, country:GB]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 15:12:00 -0000 On 07/09/2021 23:17, Doug Denault wrote: > > Following the default 12.2 zfs install I got one pool (zroot) and a > dataset for each of the traditional mount points. So zfs list shows: > > NAME                 USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT > zroot                279G  6.75T    88K  /zroot > zroot/ROOT          1.74G  6.75T    88K  none > zroot/ROOT/default  1.74G  6.75T  1.74G  / > zroot/tmp            176K  6.75T   176K  /tmp > zroot/usr            277G  6.75T    88K  /usr > zroot/usr/home       276G  6.75T   276G  /usr/home > zroot/usr/ports       88K  6.75T    88K  /usr/ports > zroot/usr/src        670M  6.75T   670M  /usr/src > zroot/var           47.5M  6.75T    88K  /var > zroot/var/audit       88K  6.75T    88K  /var/audit > zroot/var/crash       88K  6.75T    88K  /var/crash > zroot/var/log        820K  6.75T   820K  /var/log > zroot/var/mail      46.3M  6.75T  46.3M  /var/mail > zroot/var/tmp         88K  6.75T    88K  /var/tmp > > I had consultant configure another server for us. He set up the disk > array with one dataset. so zfs list on this system give: > > NAME    USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT > zroot  2.65G  13.2T  2.62G  legacy > > From a sysadmin view I rather like the multiple datasets. Are there > advantages to one over the other? Note the zroot/ROOT/default tree. This lets you use boot environments. If you're not familiar with them take a look at bectl(8) and https://wiki.freebsd.org/BootEnvironments [bectl is a base system command very similar to the earlier beadm port that you may see referenced in old documentation.] -- Nothing teaches one not to try to stamp out burning thermite quite like real-life experience. — James Davis Nicoll From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 8 16:54:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C40867E17D for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.107.128.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H4Ssk3QtGz4b1g for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571CC90898 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 188GsSJj062957 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:54:28 GMT (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) with ESMTP id 188GsSXN062954 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:54:28 GMT (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:54:28 +0000 (UTC) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: zfs newbie - wow and thanks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4Ssk3QtGz4b1g X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of doug@fledge.watson.org has no SPF policy when checking 204.107.128.30) smtp.mailfrom=doug@fledge.watson.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.57 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[doug@safeport.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.18)[-0.185]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.38)[-0.385]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[watson.org]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11288, ipnet:204.107.128.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:54:36 -0000 On Wed, 8 Sep 2021, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 07/09/2021 23:17, Doug Denault wrote: >> advantages to one over the other? > > Note the zroot/ROOT/default tree. This lets you use boot environments. > If you're not familiar with them take a look at bectl(8) and > https://wiki.freebsd.org/BootEnvironments > > [bectl is a base system command very similar to the earlier beadm port > that you may see referenced in old documentation.] > > -- > Nothing teaches one not to try to stamp out burning thermite quite > like real-life experience. > ? James Davis Nicoll First, the above quote is just to good not to include. Secondly I am sorry for the double post, I accidently used a non-subscribed email to post. When I got the "you can't do this" email from questions I just did it again with a valid email. They eventually allowed my mistake also. Thank you for all the information. I got what I need to go forward with my immediate issues. It took me a bit to understand David's setup. That was exactly what I am going for. It's above my pay-grade now but I have some bare metal to learn and practice on. Thank you all, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 8 18:54:49 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879AB67F4DC for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kh@panix.com) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H4WXS2FJNz3N9k for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kh@panix.com) Received: from rain.home (pool-96-230-243-2.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [96.230.243.2]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4H4WXK5v9Mz2x8l for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:54:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=panix.com; s=panix; t=1631127281; bh=d3uD66Zk4mmfh7r0+RJt1UyvJEgd4y96mGV+sa7l45k=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hDEyC8lVSLAObqt2d53UzLBc3xoKaTo+eZSvmPxefY/lM2Wa3GQMnHBknzyTenul4 0RO/K6pKtzoQ4kRDt1kp42xe2GFlui6JQXuBUsy6/PSrKMSkEpUb6Xq6O0B8T5CrV5 yqhcF5pqZ/vsfq3c5SCAXwPGU52Ysp3pDOXrRfrc= Subject: Re: monitoring incoming mailbox in console mode To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210908124536.GA17@sh4-5.1blu.de> From: Kurt Hackenberg Message-ID: <9ba099f4-ce0d-9611-d2c1-08967d8ddbaa@panix.com> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:54:39 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210908124536.GA17@sh4-5.1blu.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4WXS2FJNz3N9k X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=panix.com header.s=panix header.b=hDEyC8lV; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kh@panix.com designates 166.84.1.89 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kh@panix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[166.84.1.89:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.84.0.0/16]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[panix.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.60)[-0.598]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.230.243.2:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2033, ipnet:166.84.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[panix.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[panix.com:s=panix]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[panix.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[166.84.1.89:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 18:54:49 -0000 On 2021/09/08 08:45, Matthias Apitz wrote: > I want to monitor my mailbox below /var/mail/... when the system is only > running in console mode, i.e. w/o X11 and KDE desktop. On new mail, i.e. > when the last modified date of the mbox file is changing, it should > produce the normal BEL signal. Do we have something in ports before I > write my own script? Shells can check for new mail, though they don't ring the bell. Csh uses the shell variable "mail"; bash uses MAIL, MAILCHECK, and MAILPATH. See the man pages. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 8 19:07:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5090567FE4E for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 19:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d400033316d2.ae399cc7f45d7f7ad48d7fd850822650@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H4Wpp2rNnz3Qtd for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 19:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4d400033316d2.ae399cc7f45d7f7ad48d7fd850822650@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1631128034; x=1633720034; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=ySnVOeoUeQ8hWBE3f8AnRm9EYGtKq+h0Vf2g26JqJWo=; b=kxXzRNwnyoMcZI5e7W6hG+x2rxVSGVFJ0gaVjzClTfstZLjROOdwGGasxIr3zUhUHbaxiHC8ULstdbtq6vnVBr3HSv4hfBjXeM7zUxykb1bR950/EFSvc1LiUReRM8YNKG2tK13PLk15QgJoQDDaA+OumO1U+NzUB5jqVdZC3pg= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xZDRkNDAwMDMzMzE2ZDIuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r3.h.in.socketlabs.com (r3.h.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.180.13]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:07:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r3.h.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:07:09 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1mO2ua-000G3G-BW; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:07:08 +0100 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 20:07:08 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Matthias Apitz Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring incoming mailbox in console mode Message-Id: <20210908200708.4358a4b4aa7a36a0179a5d1b@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20210908124536.GA17@sh4-5.1blu.de> References: <20210908124536.GA17@sh4-5.1blu.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4Wpp2rNnz3Qtd X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=kxXzRNwn; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4d400033316d2.ae399cc7f45d7f7ad48d7fd850822650@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4d400033316d2.ae399cc7f45d7f7ad48d7fd850822650@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d400033316d2.ae399cc7f45d7f7ad48d7fd850822650@email-od.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4d400033316d2.ae399cc7f45d7f7ad48d7fd850822650@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[email-od.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 19:07:15 -0000 On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:45:36 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > I want to monitor my mailbox below /var/mail/... when the system is only > running in console mode, i.e. w/o X11 and KDE desktop. On new mail, i.e. > when the last modified date of the mbox file is changing, it should > produce the normal BEL signal. Do we have something in ports before I > write my own script? Not in the ports, in the base system but I think biff(1) does what you want. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 9 06:49:01 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D395666A89E for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 06:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H4qNX6pY5z3vLQ for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 06:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [188.174.52.146] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODrg-0003Co-VM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:48:53 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.16.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id 1896mqTk001632 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:48:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.16.1/8.14.9/Submit) id 1896mq3X001631 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:48:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:48:52 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring incoming mailbox in console mode Message-ID: Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210908124536.GA17@sh4-5.1blu.de> <20210908203244.57309565.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210908203244.57309565.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r368166 (amd64) X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text. X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 188.174.52.146 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4qNX6pY5z3vLQ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of guru@unixarea.de has no SPF policy when checking 178.254.4.101) smtp.mailfrom=guru@unixarea.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.60 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[guru@unixarea.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[188.174.52.146:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42730, ipnet:178.254.0.0/19, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[unixarea.de]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[178.254.4.101:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 06:49:01 -0000 Thanks for the hints about biff(1). I wasn't aware of it, even if I was used to use xbiff in the past. But, biff(1) does not do anything. I run $ truss -o biff.tr -f biff b and attached is the output of biff.tr. Any ideas? matthias 1582: mmap(0x0,135168,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = 34361982976 (0x800224000) 1582: mprotect(0x800221000,4096,PROT_READ) = 0 (0x0) 1582: issetugid() = 0 (0x0) 1582: sigfastblock(0x1,0x800223400) = 0 (0x0) 1582: open("/etc/libmap.conf",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC,010425330) = 3 (0x3) 1582: fstat(3,{ mode=-rw-r--r-- ,inode=66236,size=115,blksize=32768 }) = 0 (0x0) 1582: read(3,"# $FreeBSD: head/libexec/rtld-el"...,115) = 115 (0x73) 1582: close(3) = 0 (0x0) 1582: open("/usr/local/etc/libmap.d",O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC,0165) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 1582: open("/var/run/ld-elf.so.hints",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC,010003166) = 3 (0x3) 1582: read(3,"Ehnt\^A\0\0\0\M^@\0\0\0\M^A\^A\0"...,128) = 128 (0x80) 1582: fstat(3,{ mode=-r--r--r-- ,inode=196999,size=513,blksize=32768 }) = 0 (0x0) 1582: pread(3,"/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/u"...,385,0x80) = 385 (0x181) 1582: close(3) = 0 (0x0) 1582: open("/lib/libc.so.7",O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC|O_VERIFY,00) = 3 (0x3) 1582: fstat(3,{ mode=-r--r--r-- ,inode=197002,size=2127288,blksize=32768 }) = 0 (0x0) 1582: mmap(0x0,4096,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) = 34362118144 (0x800245000) 1582: mmap(0x0,4366336,PROT_NONE,MAP_GUARD,-1,0x0) = 34362122240 (0x800246000) 1582: mmap(0x800246000,561152,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x0) = 34362122240 (0x800246000) 1582: mmap(0x8002cf000,1449984,PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_NOCORE|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x88000) = 34362683392 (0x8002cf000) 1582: mmap(0x800431000,40960,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x1e9000) = 34364133376 (0x800431000) 1582: mmap(0x80043b000,28672,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_PREFAULT_READ,3,0x1f2000) = 34364174336 (0x80043b000) 1582: mmap(0x800442000,2285568,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = 34364203008 (0x800442000) 1582: munmap(0x800245000,4096) = 0 (0x0) 1582: close(3) = 0 (0x0) 1582: mprotect(0x800431000,40960,PROT_READ) = 0 (0x0) 1582: mprotect(0x800431000,40960,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0 (0x0) 1582: mprotect(0x800431000,40960,PROT_READ) = 0 (0x0) 1582: readlink("/etc/malloc.conf",0x7fffffffd5c0,1024) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 1582: issetugid() = 0 (0x0) 1582: __sysctl("vm.overcommit",2,0x7fffffffbb54,0x7fffffffbb48,0x0,0) = 0 (0x0) 1582: mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21),-1,0x0) = 34368126976 (0x800800000) 1582: mmap(0x0,2097152,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(12),-1,0x0) = 34370224128 (0x800a00000) 1582: mmap(0x0,4194304,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON|MAP_ALIGNED(21),-1,0x0) = 34372321280 (0x800c00000) 1582: mprotect(0x202000,4096,PROT_READ) = 0 (0x0) 1582: ioctl(0,TIOCGETA,0x7fffffffe880) = 0 (0x0) 1582: ioctl(0,FIODGNAME,0x7fffffffe890) = 0 (0x0) 1582: fstatat(AT_FDCWD,"/dev/ttyv0",{ mode=crw---x--- ,inode=83,size=0,blksize=4096 },0x0) = 0 (0x0) 1582: chmod("/dev/ttyv0",020610) = 0 (0x0) 1582: exit(0x0) 1582: process exit, rval = 0 -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176-38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub August 13, 1961: Better a wall than a war. And, while the GDR was still existing, no German troups and bombs have been killed in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Afrika... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 9 13:04:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4773066FFDD for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 13:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@groessler.org) Received: from vigilia.groessler.org (vigilia.groessler.org [79.143.177.135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (1024 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "vigilia.groessler.org", Issuer "vigilia.groessler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H4zjc62fsz3Mcx for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 13:04:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@groessler.org) Received: from blasi.groessler.org (gaga.groessler.org [212.168.189.235]) by vigilia.groessler.org (8.16.0.45/8.14.6) with ESMTPS id 189D49pi097038 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:04:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Paritioning scheme on MBR disk doubts To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8ab9716c-fdc3-ad09-1883-8210b37ef520@groessler.org> <20210827064821.0678b4da@archlinux> From: Christian Groessler Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:38:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210827064821.0678b4da@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H4zjc62fsz3Mcx X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of chris@groessler.org has no SPF policy when checking 79.143.177.135) smtp.mailfrom=chris@groessler.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.24 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DATE_IN_PAST(1.00)[310]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[chris]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.88)[0.881]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.46)[0.455]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[groessler.org]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:51167, ipnet:79.143.176.0/23, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 13:04:22 -0000 On 8/27/21 6:48 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 20:53:25 +0200, Christian Groessler wrote: >> If I remember correctly, an extended partition can also only hold 4 >> partitions. Of which one in turn can again be an extended partition >> which can hold 4 partitions. Of which one in turn can again be an >> extended partition... etc > That's incorrect. > > "Master Boot Record (partition table) > > In the MBR partition table (also known as DOS or MS-DOS partition > table) there are 3 types of partitions: > > Primary > Extended > Logical > > Primary partitions can be bootable and are limited to four partitions > per disk or RAID volume. If the MBR partition table requires more than > four partitions, then one of the primary partitions needs to be > replaced by an extended partition containing logical partitions within > it. > > Extended partitions can be thought of as containers for logical > partitions. A hard disk can contain no more than one extended > partition. The extended partition is also counted as a primary > partition so if the disk has an extended partition, only three > additional primary partitions are possible (i.e. three primary > partitions and one extended partition). The number of logical > partitions residing in an extended partition is unlimited. A system > that dual boots with Windows will require for Windows to reside in a > primary partition. > > The customary numbering scheme is to create primary partitions sda1 > through sda3 followed by an extended partition sda4. The logical > partitions on sda4 are numbered sda5, sda6, etc. Tip: When partitioning > a MBR disk consider leaving at least 33 512-byte sectors (16.5 KiB) of > free unpartitioned space at the end of the disk in case you ever decide > to convert it to GPT. The space will be required for the backup GPT > header." - > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/partitioning#Master_Boot_Record_(partition_table) The first sector of an extended partition has the same layout as the MBR. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 9 20:48:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1071B6774AF for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 20:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cross+freebsd@distal.com) Received: from relay.wiredblade.com (relay.wiredblade.com [168.235.95.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H5B1C5l6mz4k7M for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 20:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cross+freebsd@distal.com) Received: from mail.distal.com (pool-108-48-165-176.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.48.165.176]) by relay.wiredblade.com with ESMTPSA (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256) ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 20:48:30 +0000 Received: from smtpclient.apple ( [2001:420:c0c4:1001::7]) by tristain.distal.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 392a3143 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:48:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Ross Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Device names in ZFS pools Message-Id: <1D81F7C8-8892-4186-9CAE-593CDB66D3BA@distal.com> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:48:28 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H5B1C5l6mz4k7M X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cross@distal.com designates 168.235.95.80 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cross@distal.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:relay.dynu.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[distal.com]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3842, ipnet:168.235.92.0/22, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[108.48.165.176:received] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 08:06:04 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 20:48:33 -0000 Hey there. So, I created a ZFS pool, a RAID-Z with =E2=80=9Cda5 da2 = da3=E2=80=9D. These are then the device names that appeared in =E2=80=9Cz= pool status mypool=E2=80=9D. However, da3 had errors, and I replaced it = by another disk living at da1. Then, I removed the bad disk and moved = things in the enclosure. But, after this, some ids seem to have = changed, and what was originally =E2=80=9Cda5=E2=80=9D is now =E2=80=9Cda4= =E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Czpool status mypool=E2=80=9D shows: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 diskid/DISK-Z1Z946N90000R546NBZH ONLINE 0 0 0 da2 ONLINE 0 0 0 da1 ONLINE 0 0 0 If I use zdb, I can see that value stored in the =E2=80=9Cpath=E2=80=9D = of each child of the vdev/pool. But, can I _change_ it? I know this is = the reason many people suggest not using device names like I did, but, = if I switch to gpt labels or the like, I=E2=80=98ll still need to update = these in this existing vdev, right? How can I change these path labels? - Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Sep 11 09:34:15 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4C066ED56 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 09:34:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H66yG2mt9z4lhf for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 09:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [188.174.52.9] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOzOf-000548-SF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:34:06 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.16.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id 18B9Y3w8011880 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:34:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.16.1/8.14.9/Submit) id 18B9Y3Gi011879 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:34:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:34:03 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monitoring incoming mailbox in console mode Message-ID: Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20210908124536.GA17@sh4-5.1blu.de> <20210908203244.57309565.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r368166 (amd64) X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text. X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 188.174.52.9 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H66yG2mt9z4lhf X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of guru@unixarea.de has no SPF policy when checking 178.254.4.101) smtp.mailfrom=guru@unixarea.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.23 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[guru@unixarea.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.63)[-0.630]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[188.174.52.9:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42730, ipnet:178.254.0.0/19, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[unixarea.de]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[178.254.4.101:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 09:34:15 -0000 El día jueves, septiembre 09, 2021 a las 08:48:52a. m. +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > Thanks for the hints about biff(1). I wasn't aware of it, even if I was > used to use xbiff in the past. > > But, biff(1) does not do anything. I run > > $ truss -o biff.tr -f biff b > > and attached is the output of biff.tr. Any ideas? I've had a glance through the source in /usr/src/usr.bin/biff/biff.c and it only tweaks on some bits in the perms of the tty you're login on: ... switch (argv[0][0]) { case 'n': if (chmod(name, sb.st_mode & ~(S_IXUSR | S_IXGRP)) < 0) err(2, "%s", name); break; case 'y': if (chmod(name, (sb.st_mode & ~(S_IXUSR | S_IXGRP)) | S_IXUSR) < 0) err(2, "%s", name); break; case 'b': if (chmod(name, (sb.st_mode & ~(S_IXUSR | S_IXGRP)) | S_IXGRP) < 0) err(2, "%s", name); break; default: usage(); } return (sb.st_mode & (S_IXUSR | S_IXGRP) ? 0 : 1); ... and then exits. The rest should depend on the login shell and its env var MAIL and/or MAIL_PATH. Said that, it does not do what I want because in many times my netbook is only booted, receives mails to /var/mail/guru and I'm only connected via SSH to it. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176-38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub August 13, 1961: Better a wall than a war. And, while the GDR was still existing, no German troups and bombs have been killed in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Afrika... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Sep 11 23:35:07 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1BF679A02 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodbrian77@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H6TcV0hn3z4gbs for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodbrian77@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id s4so3677965uar.5 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:35:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=u8+tNe7Bt8YfRQgNNKrCJaUKb8parc1E2g0+sDIz5MM=; b=UAZ9q/Ec8QPcb+kiCN2vsBhq5gWIi1iu7EfaBbaLEEfkyplg4Q3UDxCo2wMwk3olow tSdDowxqWXz7S9+YLVJlqD2ZfjNP+AfP2RRUafhOYU8JjhujQ1o/9rMfoHOVWliw583A N3xTkXNtZu1p1nvVUDyTV2qjq4uazlDLamd4aGfU4tUPC7Jo80LJuHLEPv4a5g2OLJTQ WDTInkARU4M1drot8+HDkAiiJaH4wqCi17DK/nfqpnQy0ETDnjdHAFgGSEhIkPAxUDtz N4ieGagt6Ch6A2oEdl2LhWt7lHriLJwVZ91obyVOA02coV9xf95zrXexmt7TXpDcfV7m pQAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=u8+tNe7Bt8YfRQgNNKrCJaUKb8parc1E2g0+sDIz5MM=; b=yUKHI54ltFmqCQ3Da/ZvdEHhwlr2+cmZ6+e5yyUe3s3vSByTT/a9DwhEeBiVrDq/E9 T6xDlJUMUld0q/5e4yoHkfTePKJjYxldWRWhLTt0ZaV4+YvQYXFf8UIC/R+pxmFbvFJL XDluRLSkWLSCWuP+2MCv6fTRkC3zY4ZRy6NN7mcNZIvKrOW/dOwc7dTCibePwFgs9dmu 4Qf/zW3yJYPBLuCnEV+DXISy9P42N4wNaLY7URd8gojECyETdIx+PIGwT6dmq+Nx8/yS M9HA52a4ngyyueQGoolNhjCF0DFUDW7Zrx1lyhTh/ay+7r3YODA57sZg50Fl64G69e06 4wxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307Mwqr1FasEIiqSsj0HlX1yNWUa6KMCqxUQtKqFxbnjV/fdmC3 3/iAkirDTmEQJElbIMupe7nhI7ebTId4PMe7ooREVoZ0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/52K7hwQWN1dzVlikiE1w8VvGfy5HQiQ+OPMqeXE6/8S8zYD7gLchnOS/NxqZb10ixgCW+YhUj1aq54nR0vA= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:60d8:: with SMTP id g24mr1891861uam.110.1631403305500; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:35:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Brian Wood Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 18:34:54 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: boot/shutdown times To: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H6TcV0hn3z4gbs X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="UAZ9q/Ec"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of woodbrian77@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::930 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=woodbrian77@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.90 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20210112]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.15)[-0.145]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.979]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::930:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.778]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:35:07 -0000 I haven't measured, but it seems like boot and shutdown times have improved over the years, but that they are still a lot slower than Linux. Is there more that can be done to improve these times? Thanks. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. https://webEbenezer.net