From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 08:10:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9826E16A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:10:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.redjade.org (neo.redjade.org [219.254.21.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C5F43D2F for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: from neo.redjade.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j228AKIe025267; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:10:20 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: (from ssw@localhost) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j228AJd2025266; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:10:19 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:10:19 +0900 From: Sangwoo Shim To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050302081019.GA25222@neo.redjade.org> References: <200503011650.j21GoI7o018125@peedub.jennejohn.org> <61202.1109698143@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61202.1109698143@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Gary Jennejohn cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about import mpd into base system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:10:16 -0000 On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <200503011650.j21GoI7o018125@peedub.jennejohn.org>, Gary Jennejohn w > rites: > > > >Sangwoo Shim writes: > >> Mpd is likely to be used by FreeBSD (and might DFBSD) exclusively. So, how > >> about import mpd into the base tree? Is there any stopper to prevent mpd from > >> being included into the tree? > >> > > > >Why? /usr/sbin/ppp supports PPPoE just fine and is already in the base. > > They should be merged. > > mpd-netgraph has functionality missing in the ppp in the base system. Exactly my opinion. I'm glad to know you think like that! Hmm, I'm curious whether there is any commiter planning mpd import. Will it help someone submit PR about this? Regards, Sangwoo Shim