Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:15:59 +0100 (BST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bad NFS/UDP performance 
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.1.10.0809271114450.20117@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1KjEZw-000KkH-GP@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
References:  <E1Kj7NA-000FXz-3F@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <20080926081806.GA19055@icarus.home.lan> <E1Kj9bR-000H7t-0g@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <20080926095230.GA20789@icarus.home.lan> <E1KjEZw-000KkH-GP@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Danny Braniss wrote:

> after more testing, it seems it's related to changes made between Aug 4 and 
> Aug 29 ie, a kernel built on Aug 4 works fine, Aug 29 is slow. I'l now try 
> and close the gap.

I think this is the best way forward -- skimming August changes, there are a 
number of candidate commits, including retuning of UDP hashes by mav, my 
rwlock changes, changes to mbuf chain handling, etc.

Thanks,

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.1.10.0809271114450.20117>