Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900
From:      Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To:        Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Results of BIND RFC
Message-ID:  <m2eiiymfa2.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org> <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
> sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision.  How hard
> it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the 
> critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving
> the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port?

i don't mind if dig, doc, et alia are not in base, as long as they are a
separate port from the bind hippo.

randy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2eiiymfa2.wl%randy>