From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 11 10:34:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2320E1065696; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ady@ady.ro) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964CE8FC2A; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so255797eyf.9 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:34:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ady@ady.ro Received: by 10.211.141.7 with SMTP id t7mr345374ebn.99.1252665287327; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:34:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909091831.n89IVOS9065418@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200909091831.n89IVOS9065418@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Adrian Penisoara Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:34:27 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c24ea4c5cec2c4a7 Message-ID: <78cb3d3f0909110334g6757f08fh57a0ab97c02b2d9a@mail.gmail.com> To: pjd@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/120228: [zfs] [patch] Split ZFS volume startup / ease ZFS swap volumes management X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:34:49 -0000 Hi, On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:31 PM, wrote: > Synopsis: [zfs] [patch] Split ZFS volume startup / ease ZFS swap volumes = management > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: pjd > State-Changed-When: =C5=9Bro 9 wrz 2009 18:14:21 UTC > State-Changed-Why: > Thank you for your patch, but I already committed something along those l= ine. We're probably speaking of SVN changeset 195938 ? > rc.d/zfs script was broken and there is now also rc.d/zvol script. It was > created so ZVOL-based file systems can be mounted from /etc/fstab. > Using ZVOL property to setup swap was intended - ZFS file systems are als= o not > mounted from /etc/fstab. All in all using ZVOL for swap is unreliable any= way. While I do understand the "unreliable" part I still fail to understand why do we need to complicate matters with ZFS user property signatures to mount ZFS swap volumes instead of the traditional /etc/fstab way -- is there a concrete reason for this (besides said reliability) ? Thanks, Adrian Penisoara EnterpriseBSD