From owner-freebsd-security Tue Oct 14 08:58:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA26070 for security-outgoing; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security) Received: from obie.softweyr.ml.org ([199.104.124.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA26065 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 08:58:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@xmission.com) Received: (from wes@localhost) by obie.softweyr.ml.org (8.7.5/8.6.12) id KAA10428; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:04:46 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:04:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199710141604.KAA10428@obie.softweyr.ml.org> From: Wes Peters To: Christopher Petrilli CC: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <199710140208.WAA00781@dworkin.amber.org> References: <199710140208.WAA00781@dworkin.amber.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Christopher Petrilli writes: > But what about when you have 10,000 users, and you need 486 of them to > not have access? Do you see the issue of performance slowly creeping up > when yyou have 50,000 groups? This becomes a hideous nightmare. Right. A "secure" system with 10,000 users. You obviously don't understand security in the same way the government does. ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com