Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:29:31 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
Cc:        Nguyen Tam Chinh <unixvn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files
Message-ID:  <20070701202758.B64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20070630235127.GX15680@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
References:  <64b284310706270311j2a6af2f6i6766b483a4b66a5c@mail.gmail.com> <20070630235127.GX15680@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> I have tried using a 4K/0.5K UFS1 filesystem in the past and found the
> performance was very poor.  UFS2 was based on 16K/2K and I would expect
> it to perform even worse with 4K/0.5K.  I would suggest you try 8K/1K.
>

not for small files. you are light with large files but it's not THAT bad 
as you say. i reagularly use 4K/0.5 UFS but not for everything if i 
require good fast speed for big files. for really big files i make 32/4 
filesystem with very little inodes



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070701202758.B64116>