From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 10 03:15:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494AD241 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23571611 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 10so7128422ied.33 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 20:15:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pE/2BwaFzBISXH2vwLE4W76DRnBag4wHPyjUv431EII=; b=P+OkDS7MUtL+5wyAWRcsmvYbdUf5XuWqQx/uX5Qdcn92KuQG6dKhFgiBXZ4HOEhiXL QvxrWjFfOtUSwIJ2DLdxJ3dNpYsVKpvUAa8BNS3cm+ugo/J78IXmOl7JMqPZA90CEgCz uXzQEkA5C4XcTNpOhuvpSQYlt/356hbzDhY/kJzqEBDXuLUh3VqjQc0/DiWiTsKyoqBX 7B8zt6JJuT0a5DRV61zv6W7PAfqK+xgajGU70nNg51Bkd3ljqWsa+AmlgM9wbtlKr6C4 +fbq2giktNVV49C55mh/+iVVWJipL2j7Sq0CUyLaIg030smSnkEQ4udVaNc8P5NVL98E Tozg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.132.105 with SMTP id ot9mr577586igb.57.1368155758863; Thu, 09 May 2013 20:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.171.102 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 20:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:58 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WANTED: Tool to verify installed package/port consistancy From: "b.f." To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:59 -0000 Ronald wrote: ... > It occurs to me that *something*, i.e. some tool(s) within the FreeBSD > panoply, *must* already be reading and/or otherwise making use of those > MD5 checksums within the +CONTENTS files. Otherwise, why would they even > be there? So my question really comes down to this: What pre-existing > software tools are available that can and do check the MD5 checksums, as > given the the +CONTENTS file(s), of various files associated with some > given installed port or package? ... Yes, of course, this is a basic package management feature: pkg_info(1) with the "-g" flag. (The analogous part of the newer pkgng is described in pkg-check(8) from ports-mgmt/pkg.) b.