From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 10 16:40:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA07053 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from axe.cablenet.net (axe.cablenet.net [194.154.36.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA07026 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from axe (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by axe.cablenet.net (8.8.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA13045; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 00:36:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <34172EF4.5E652F78@cablenet.net> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 00:36:20 +0100 From: Damian Hamill Organization: CableNet Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.4 sun4m) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Shankland CC: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sync card? References: <199709102127.OAA21065@biggusdiskus.flyingfox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jim Shankland wrote: > > The SDL WANic works great in FreeBSD 2.2.x; see http://www.sdlcomm.com. > > Jim Shankland > Flying Fox Computer Systems, Inc. Not so great, I could only get it to work in PPP mode not HDLC. It will be great when FreeBSD is a supported platform. At the moment BSDI, Linux and NT are supported and they're not worth donkey shit compared to FreeBSD as you all know. Someone else suggested the ET card was difficult to set up. I don't know about that. If you do exactly what the manual says it will work first time. I like both cards. The SDL card is cheaper, but the ET card is made for FreeBSD and has more features. regards damian -- * Damian Hamill M.D. damian@cablenet.net * CableNet & The Landscape Channel * http://www.cablenet.net/ http://www.landscapetv.com/