From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 17 20:16:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB3116A420 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc3-cdif2-0-0-cust64.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.106.128.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830A313C478 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ItTah-0002lk-8x; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:44:31 +0000 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:44:31 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Adam McDougall Message-ID: <20071117194431.GE14309@submonkey.net> References: <20071117013104.GE46369@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071117013104.GE46369@egr.msu.edu> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hook up idmapd to build in 6-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:16:45 -0000 --O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:31:04PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > I am beginning to dabble with NFSv4 client functionality. I noticed > idmapd is not built in -stable but it has been in -current since src/sbin= /Makefile > v. 1.163 (13 months ago). Should it be hooked up to the build? Thanks At the time I was looking at it in -current, idmapd worked fine but the client had serious issues (nothing on an NFSv4 mount could be executed, for instance) which I couldn't track down, so I stopped working with it. I think that hooking up idmapd could be a good thing to do in order to expose those problems, but I'm concerned that it may give the impression that our NFSv4 client is any use, which it appears not to be (at least 13 months ago; apologies if this is not longer the case). Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHP0SeocfcwTS3JF8RAsJpAKCN2ir3wqQt9J+d/T5NhpBFAo0gvwCgsApj yojm36uGL8DfaCdpQ6zHUts= =1+Z8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5--