Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:51:29 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sctp files location Message-ID: <20090408165129.GA17444@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <EA835027-CAB4-4361-9170-831970E152DA@lakerest.net> References: <20090408130350.GA9916@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <EA835027-CAB4-4361-9170-831970E152DA@lakerest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:38:18PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: > I actually proposed that way back when > we brought SCTP in the tree (there is not that > big of difference now and then.. can't remember I know, it's not because of some recent addition, i just took your commit message as a reminder to ask the question again. I already asked this 1-2 months ago when i was planning to do similar work on ipfw/dummynet, and realised how large netinet/ has become. > when the last time was we added a file .. before > svn thats for sure). At that time I was advised it > is best just to leave it like TCP and UDP. I guess whoever responded at the time did not realized the number of files involved. Even tcp_* and ip_* account for a large number of files, but there is more legacy there (especially for the headers) so they are harder to move around. In the sctp case, though, legacy should not be an issue. cheers luigi > R > On Apr 8, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > >Randall, there is now a total of 36 sctp files under sys/netinet > >(22 headers, 12 source). > >Wouldn't it be the case to move them (except for the userland headers) > >under netinet/sctp/ ? > > > > cheers > > luigi > > > > ------------------------------ > Randall Stewart > 803-317-4952 (cell) > 803-345-0391(direct)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090408165129.GA17444>