From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 31 14:23:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB6916A4DE for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dereckhaskins@yahoo.com) Received: from web30602.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30602.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCC3443D4C for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dereckhaskins@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 27598 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Aug 2006 14:23:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=P1+xNdUYWSwc6D/LM/r+b/S625SLffzPkfG/KBsGfQvdG1T2opTt2uoNibLCtOqVvSXyns1WVl7pz2dzikZo0sUGDQMHNPW9kviD4oSG+Y/WbHDuUb3uMPMGto2NR/SB1+m1oj3Mb+xt6dn1NATAumQLbwvcdZrFpS2ruwz6hOI= ; Message-ID: <20060831142321.27596.qmail@web30602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [74.67.37.66] by web30602.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:23:21 PDT Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:23:21 -0700 (PDT) From: dereck To: netbsd-users@netbsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, misc@openbsd.org, miros-discuss@mirbsd.org In-Reply-To: <950621ad0608310654h78ae0023g346abd108815ae72@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: The future of NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:23:23 -0000 > I'm just a lurker on the OpenBSD list, but I think > Charles is right about > Linux. The code is better then people give it credit > for, and considering > it's vast popularity and what all it's accomplished, > the "bazaar" model has > worked wonders. Well, the hype certainly put the zap on your head. "Wonders"? So, if I take a picture of a van Gogh painting, copy it as poorly as a three-year-old child, put an OSI license on it and call it "open van Gogh" that would be wonderous? They are copying known work, shooting for a target that has already been hit. Ignore IBM's and ESR's hype. Linux is a rather poor re-implementation. The BS is the only thing that is "accomplished," unless you count the illusions of grandeur as well. What I'd _really_ like to hear is the status of the total "move-over" to Linux that IBM announced (what was it?) 3 freakin years ago? How is that coming, old Big Bloser?