Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:50:02 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc:        Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/shells Makefile ports/shells/bash3 Makefile distinfo pkg-deinstall pkg-descr pkg-install pkg-plist ports/shells/bash3/files patch-ac patch-af patch-bashline.c patch-builtins_shopt.def patch-config-bot.h ...
Message-ID:  <20040811205002.GD44709@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <1092239490.731.0.camel@gyros>
References:  <AFE9187C-EB88-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <411A0898.3020605@portaone.com> <411A0B41.9070607@portaone.com> <1092239490.731.0.camel@gyros>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:51:30AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 08:04, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > P.S. My recommendation is to kill both bash1 and bash2, repo-copy bash3 
> > into just bash and remove bash3 as well.
> 
> Actually, we can't do that.  In order to preserve all histories, we
> should delete bash2 and bash3, and update bash to 3.0....that is, if
> that's what all the maintainers agree to.

I'm not sure we can kill the 'bash1' port.  When I tried to do that
before, I got many unhappy emails.  The jurry is still out on if 'bash2'
needs to exist for a while.  We should probably have a plain 'bash' port
that is the latest version.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040811205002.GD44709>