From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 13 11:53:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C4916A46F for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E4843D53 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:53:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B205C20A2; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:53:13 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5553208E; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:53:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 880FC33C31; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:53:13 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Jason M" References: Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:53:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jason M.'s message of "Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:03:56 +1000") Message-ID: <864q22a7di.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DSD Approved Products X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:53:41 -0000 "Jason M" writes: > I am considering installing several `servers' in a facility that > needs to conform with the products listed at: DSD Approved Products > http://www.dsd.gov.au/infosec/evaluation_services/epl/dap.html > > As far as i can see freebsd performs above and beyond, for all the > required criteria in the act. Can we see freebsd listed as an > approved product in the near future? Unfortunately, getting on that list costs a lot of money, and you have to start over with every new release. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no