From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 28 01:23:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF39D16A403 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D72213C47E for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so1526931nfc for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:23:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VC+JCcEiGLZP2HRVvz8v7amqFD//imunwQbYjkayybPJ90Oc0pVh+TL8cauJzh44cJ8PksVKPmn9rVaB8m9hmDCQIbFtoVvXeh5Z1uGqv1Q6zSIojJXGzTkVuF5Yjx9fAwQ4drt2jwVSJHUDudjxyOGwDMTZPTKbVxA5rQflQCM= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr2806241buc.1169947431530; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:23:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.186.2 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:23:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <790a9fff0701271723k3e7e57bfncc0addbfd3532f46@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:23:51 -0600 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: bv@wjv.com In-Reply-To: <20070127235408.GA50433@wjv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070126161022.GB29530@wjv.com> <20070126171552.GA24490@dan.emsphone.com> <20070127235408.GA50433@wjv.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: 6.2 buildworld fails with NO_SHARED X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:23:53 -0000 On 1/27/07, Bill Vermillion wrote: > No real problem there, but that brings up another question. > If - as documented in make.conf(5) - I put use the variable > NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT it says "set this is you do not want to link > /bin and /sbin dynamically". > > Would that be the way to build statics in /bin and /sbin > instead of NO_SHARED. > I forgot about that option. Using NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT would be the proper way to build /bin and /sbin statically, and still have the rest compied dynamically. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.