From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 30 10:34:09 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id KAA15768 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 10:34:09 -0700 Received: from fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.131.171]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA15761 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 10:34:07 -0700 Received: by fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA01748; Sun, 30 Jul 95 17:33:45 GMT Received: by emu.fsl.noaa.gov (1.38.193.4/SMI-4.1 (1.38.193.4)) id AA05948; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 11:33:41 -0600 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 11:33:41 -0600 From: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly) Message-Id: <9507301733.AA05948@emu.fsl.noaa.gov> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507291153.EAA02399@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Subject: Re: Tcl 7.4 / Tk 4.0 Ports Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Satoshi" == Satoshi Asami writes: Satoshi> Ok, so now it's "release", but is it still incompatible? According to the various README-style files, *both* tcl7.4 and tk4.0 are somewhat incompatible with scripts written for tcl7.3 and tk4.0. In my own repertoire of scripts, all of my tcl-only scripts work fine with tcl7.4. It's a different story with my tk4.0 scripts, though. -- Sean Kelly NOAA Forecast Systems Lab, Boulder Colorado USA Love can sweep you off your feet and carry you along in a way you've never known before. But the ride always ends, and you end up feeling lonely and bitter. Wait. It's not love I'm describing. I'm thinking of a monorail. -- Jack Handey