From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Fri Jan 19 17:44:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org
Received: from mail7.sc.rr.com (mail7.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.54])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326237B400
	for <multimedia@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:44:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sc.rr.com ([24.88.102.101]) by mail7.sc.rr.com  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);
	 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:44:29 -0500
Received: (from dmaddox@localhost)
	by sc.rr.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0K1jR900999;
	Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:45:27 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from dmaddox)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:45:27 -0500
From: "Donald J . Maddox" <dmaddox@sc.rr.com>
To: Coleman Kane <cokane@micro.ti.com>,
	"Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Jacob Frelinger <jolly@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>
Subject: Re: problems with gl apps.
Message-ID: <20010119204527.A962@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>
Reply-To: dmaddox@sc.rr.com
Mail-Followup-To: Coleman Kane <cokane@micro.ti.com>,
	Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Jacob Frelinger <jolly@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>
References: <20010119003117.A6702@cokane.yi.org> <XFMail.010119160418.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20010119034036.A7735@cokane.yi.org> <20010119033350.A3643@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010119033350.A3643@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>; from dmaddox@sc.rr.com on Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:33:50AM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Sorry, but I seem to have totally fabricated this in my feverish
imagination :-/  I could swear that I had read on one of the lists
that libc and libc_r were being unified, but I can find no reference
whatsoever to it now.  Sorry...  Must rest now... ;)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:33:50AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote:
> A lot more portable.  libc_r no longer exists on -current.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:40:36AM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
> > Yeah, they do the same thing don't they? (I guess -pthread is
> > technically more portable)
> > 
> > Daniel O'Connor had the audacity to say:
> > > 
> > > On 19-Jan-01 Coleman Kane wrote:
> > > >  Link them with -lc_r (libc_r.so).
> > > 
> > > You mean add -pthread to the compile flags right?
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
> > > for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
> > > "The nice thing about standards is that there
> > > are so many of them to choose from."
> > >   -- Andrew Tanenbaum
> > > 
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message