Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:55:24 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Peter Looyenga <pl@catslair.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Would software "for non-commercial use" be acceptable as a port? Message-ID: <20130728005524.GM34979@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <001001ce8b29$63546b80$29fd4280$@catslair.org> References: <001001ce8b29$63546b80$29fd4280$@catslair.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 02:28:31AM +0200 I heard the voice of Peter Looyenga, and lo! it spake thus: > > Am I right to conclude that the product, with the non-commercial > clause I described above, could be a candidate for the ports > collection or would the restriction be a huge obstacle? There are a number of entries in ports/LEGAL along the lines of "no commercial use", often with RESTRICTED or NO_CDROM or the like also set in the ports' Makefile's. Lots of examples to extrapolate from there. See also <http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-restrictions.html>; -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130728005524.GM34979>