Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:16:47 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Dmitry Marakasov" <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] multimedia/libquicktime: default LAME option to on Message-ID: <op.ukgp6wcu9aq2h7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20081111121247.GA65879@hades.panopticon> References: <20081109173334.9851A1702D@hades.panopticon> <b2203fed0811101204t52dc4267tc995a758cefe22de@mail.gmail.com> <20081111121247.GA65879@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:12:47 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: > * Michael Johnson (ahze@ahze.net) wrote: > >> > Enable LAME option by default. I have a port (pending >> > multimedia/openmovieeditor update) that needs lame-enabled >> libquicktime and >> > unfortunately, there's no way to depend on other ports' options :( >> The reason lame is off by default is so we can have a libquicktime >> package >> due to license restrictions in lame. > > Got it. Then maybe any suggestions on how to properly update > openmovieeditor? I can think of some hacky stuff like checking for > WITH_LAME in PORT_DBDIR/libquicktime and marking port with IGNORE > otherwise. All you have to use exists() to check on lib/libquicktime/lqt_lame.so. Is it allows to enable lame support by default in ports tree, but disable only on package (PACKAGE_BUILDING)? Of course, you will have to add something to not build package for openmovieeditor too to avoid get error from tinderbox. Maybe you should make a request to the openmovieeditor team to see if they can make lame to optional? Explain them about that it has license restrictions in lame. Oh hey ahze! ;-) Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.ukgp6wcu9aq2h7>