From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Nov 9 14:19:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9557464DD9 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [85.215.255.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CVCmQ6Kwvz4ssv for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1604931555; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=laverenz.de; h=In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=DNklBdmhvA2jVYGIgQGptD21EK5r1gMnY59f9b8bX9Q=; b=NWPXrw7vX+9Z9Z2wHypbeXKPLFVIsU9u9qp5iQDkRBiNs7wmWPnk7TQ3v1sr0AQrd2 3CDh4N4DuGdYCCIVV0zQ7MbzdNSr1SLNcBNLrg78v77s1/D4uL0pJ8Zud9MYH7LJX5na hikmxPYapuu453GVElt44fOWvd+5/Ov36CLuZ6CM1GWPbXciT7A5F5ry6Rw5y2VTXts2 ReVNCm2wXe48Ce8VmoHkScenxBcowuarhP/1K3WPWfbszavHnCeTTlHZoks/GNRrKGF8 2If1AZ2meTrf9Fm8sNFmShPYm5SvNR1Ds9eF7/eEiKTKkEC5tpwdo21CrxUSX7SDF6tB jB8A== X-RZG-AUTH: ":OXsBVUypbfpT6qxpIFUXA72d7llIsX3z+WHwYj8H6IbCIawpmk4RBvMpjs6eeBclb4A=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from [10.0.32.158] by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.3.3 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id D053fcwA9EJF7ZL (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:19:15 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Firefox memory usage To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20201109052945.6fcfaf70.freebsd@edvax.de> <20201109090703.4642059f@DaemONX> From: Uwe Laverenz Organization: private site Message-ID: <0489c069-c4d9-ab63-69fc-dcd0b5be9133@laverenz.de> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:19:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CVCmQ6Kwvz4ssv X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=laverenz.de header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=NWPXrw7v; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of uwe@laverenz.de has no SPF policy when checking 85.215.255.22) smtp.mailfrom=uwe@laverenz.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.56 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[85.215.255.22:from]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[laverenz.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.26)[-0.263]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[85.215.255.22:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6724, ipnet:85.215.255.0/24, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[laverenz.de:s=strato-dkim-0002]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[laverenz.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[85.215.255.22:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[85.215.255.22:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 14:19:20 -0000 Hi, Am 09.11.20 um 12:25 schrieb Tomasz CEDRO: > I also work on a desktop based FreeBSD workstation with AMD CPU and > RADEON GPU also the Enlightenment WM and I can see no impact like this > in preformance-vs-experience. Maybe the slowdowns you see on Intel CPUs are due to the many fixes that became necessary because of the spectre an meltdown side-channel problems. AFAIK Intel CPUs are affected more than AMD CPUs. cu, Uwe