From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Tue Mar  9 12:34:26 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AD314F23
	for <freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  9 Mar 1999 12:34:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA67166;
	Tue, 9 Mar 1999 12:33:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu>
Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>,
	Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>,
	Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Ports 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Mar 1999 12:34:43 MST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903091154280.20575-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu> 
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 12:33:24 -0800
Message-ID: <67162.921011604@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Look guys, ports will continue to be maintained substantially the way
they're currently maintained despite ANY discussion that may occur
here about any "better way", so really, what's the point?  No amount
of impassioned argument on either side is going to change a frickin'
thing here.

- Jordan



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message