From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Aug 24 19:45:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F609C27E6 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org) Received: from olinguito.schwarzes.net (olinguito.schwarzes.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:1b5::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E62306CA for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org) Received: from [62.109.78.35] (mosquito.schwarzes.net [62.109.78.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by olinguito.schwarzes.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id t7OJjS3H042920; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:45:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org) From: Andreas Schwarz To: bob prohaska CC: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mail-Reply-To: Andreas Schwarz Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:45:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46cf515c578.3287465a@mail.schwarzes.net> In-Reply-To: <20150824060039.GB53136@www.zefox.net> References: <20150824023341.GA53136@www.zefox.net> <46ce73e06bb.4eaff7b7@mail.schwarzes.net> <20150824060039.GB53136@www.zefox.net> User-Agent: YAM/2.9p1 (MorphOS; PPC; rv:20140418r7798) Subject: Re: Crash during installworld on RPI2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (olinguito.schwarzes.net [78.47.41.143]); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:45:29 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:45:33 -0000 On 23.08.15, bob prohaska wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:00:34AM +0200, Andreas Schwarz wrote: >> Flag "M" indicates a modified source tree, do you have still old patches active? >> > > Not knowingly. The source tree was obtained using > svnlite checkout /usr/src > > and all updates were via > svnlite update /usr/src > > Might it be helpful to delete the source tree and checkout again? Not needed, to see the differences you can perform a "svnlite status /usr/src/" Delete the modified files (svn update will not overwrite modified files), and do the svn update again. > I'm starting to wonder if a problem with the microSD card is indicated. The output which you have posted, looks like a problem which was reported by some other users here. It's not clear if it is fixed or not. I was also affected, but I can't reproduce it at the moment with current. -asc