From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 11:45:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBA316A420; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:45:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92E143D46; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:45:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1KBjjLq036277; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:45:45 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:45:40 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602200845.40948.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/93422: Re: ipfw divert rule X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:45:48 -0000 On Monday 20 February 2006 00:00, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > joao> ipfw add 1000 divert 8669 proto ip > joao> 01000 divert 8669 ip from any to any proto ip > > The ipfw supports an IPv6 on 6.x and later. It broke a syntax for a > tunnel. So, this was changed to mean an IPv4 over IPv4 tunnel on > 6.1-PRERELEASE and later. > >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c.diff?r1=3D1.7= 9&r2 >=3D1.80 > Hi I am not sure if I understand what you mean but the patch you pointed out = is=20 not for releng_6 and the date is quiet old but it is not clear for me what ip6/ip4 tunneling has to do with diverting Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br