From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Jun 12 00:17:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA13770 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from plaut.de (ns.plaut.de [194.39.177.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA13764; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 00:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from totum.plaut.de (totum.plaut.de [194.39.177.9]) by plaut.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA12589; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:17:46 +0200 Received: from localhost (afuchs@localhost) by totum.plaut.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA06068; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:17:46 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:17:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: alex fuchsstadt To: Stefan Esser cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: overclocking In-Reply-To: <19970611225420.26050@mi.uni-koeln.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Stefan Esser wrote: > On Jun 11, alex fuchsstadt wrote: > > I read all the mails about the overclocking theme and it turned to some > > different but interesting ones. > > I had a NCR 53C810 too and it died while working with fBSD, I suddenly got > > a message like: NCR died ......... > > Well, there is no test for a "dead" NCR chip in the code, > so you can only have received a message from the timeout > handler, which warns if no progress has been made for some > time. > There was a timeout message, sure, but there was a message like (!) NCR died.... also. The system was running fBSD 2.1, installation from CDROM. Do you know whether it's the NCR-chip itself or something different of the few parts of the small board? Alexander Fuchsstadt -------------------- R/3-Basis Plaut Software GmbH