From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Dec 11 13:14:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA01085 for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:14:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA01074; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:14:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 0zoZtO-0001aB-00; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:14:30 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.1/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA04488; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:13:02 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199812112113.OAA04488@harmony.village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: HEADS UP : laptop power-down change Cc: Archie Cobbs , mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 11 Dec 1998 21:29:50 +0100." <2261.913408190@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <2261.913408190@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:13:02 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <2261.913408190@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : If you guys have so much time on your hands, why don't you go close a PR : or ten ? I'd file a PR on this and close it, but I want to make sure that Mike and I don't get into a checkin stalemate. Put another way, why aren't more serious problems being solved? Yes, it is a minor change, but why make it to the kernel? having halt and halt -p map to the same thing on i386 seems reasonable to me. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message