From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 07:11:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17691065676; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51C48FC08; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA14541; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:11:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1ORK6u-0003FL-If; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:11:00 +0300 Message-ID: <4C21B383.2000602@icyb.net.ua> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:10:59 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100603) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Petter Selasky References: <201006230238.06831.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C21AE18.4050400@icyb.net.ua> <201006230852.26536.hselasky@c2i.net> <4C21B170.2030903@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C21B170.2030903@icyb.net.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:11:05 -0000 on 23/06/2010 10:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: > I don't dispute that it is found broken in particular environments, I just think > that the analysis could be incorrect. Which also brings the question - what arch(s) is affected? I tested on amd64. -- Andriy Gapon