Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 02:38:05 +0100 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: Viktor Lazlo <viktorlazlo@telus.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO Lawsuits, round 2 Message-ID: <20031123013805.GC532@dds.nl> In-Reply-To: <20031119133124.A3269@d66-183-123-52.bchsia.telus.net> References: <23740.216.195.235.103.1069277586.squirrel@webmail.gigguardian.com> <99E31C70-1AD6-11D8-9E07-000393A335A2@mac.com> <20031119133124.A3269@d66-183-123-52.bchsia.telus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:51:08PM -0800, Viktor Lazlo wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lawrence Sica wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2003, at 4:33 PM, Chip McClure wrote: > > > Anyone happen to have a look at Slashdot recently? Happen to wander > > > across > > > an article on the next round of lawsuits, targetting the BSD community. > > > > > > IMO, SCO's grabbing at straws, and they're sinking fast. > > > > > > http://www.newsforge.com/business/03/11/18/1742216.shtml? > > > tid=2&tid=82&tid=85&tid=94 > > > > > > > > I'm no lawyer, but I don't see how much hope SCO has. The lawsuit was > > settled and alll... > > Settled out of court though, which means there was no legal resolution, > giving them some potential, although unlikely, room for leverage. > The only leverage they got is going to cord and claim something about the agreement was not allowed by law. Even if they did they proberbly stil are not able to undo it. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031123013805.GC532>