Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:51:21 -0400 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFT vidcontrol for vt(4) Message-ID: <53715E79.2040408@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <5370E800.8040803@freebsd.org> References: <20140311162743.072870a9afd4f74fff9e99e8@ddteam.net> <5370CE34.8000905@orange.fr> <20140512171415.558dbcb68971d1db675ea39e@ddteam.net> <5370E47E.7030304@orange.fr> <5370E800.8040803@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/12/14 11:25, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > [...] > > Is there any reason not to have kbdmux be mandatory at this point? > [...] Does this mean mandatory in the sense that the kbdmux driver always gets built and loaded, or that the kbdmux driver must always be in operation (treating all keyboard-like devices as a single unified source of keystrokes)? I could live with the first, but there are definitely times that I want multiple independent keyboards on a system to be considered unrelated to one another. -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53715E79.2040408>