From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug  7 06:36:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C10416A41F;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 06:36:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.allbsd.org (vlsi00.si.noda.tus.ac.jp [133.31.130.32])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CDC44389;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 06:36:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p13123-adsau14honb8-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp
	[220.106.49.123]) (authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.allbsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j776aDXD003943;
	Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:36:14 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10])
	by delta.allbsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j776ZYoh098649;
	Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:35:35 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 15:34:25 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20050807.153425.21897310.hrs@allbsd.org>
To: cperciva@FreeBSD.org
From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <42F54DD4.7080901@freebsd.org>
References: <42F47C0D.2020704@freebsd.org> <42F51979.2020509@FreeBSD.org>
	<42F54DD4.7080901@freebsd.org>
X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530  FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha1;
	boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug__7_15_34_25_2005_372)--"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2,
	clamav-milter version 0.86 on gatekeeper.allbsd.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 06:36:18 -0000

----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug__7_15_34_25_2005_372)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> wrote
  in <42F54DD4.7080901@freebsd.org>:

cp> But for formality: Does anyone have an objection to having the base system
cp> enlarged by about 40kB by adding a program for updating the ports tree which
cp> is faster, uses less bandwidth, is more secure, and is easier to use than cvsup,
cp> while also having the side benefit of distributing pre-built INDEX files?

 Is the server-side part of portsnap available now?  I am interested in
 mirroring since portsnap.daemonology.net is too far from my box in Japan.

-- 
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug__7_15_34_25_2005_372)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBC9atyTyzT2CeTzy0RAqgHAJ9QGHCNWBh1cGgM2s5XtGSepveg+gCgtY47
R1HZCR0sk0Ntg5qpshYbAOc=
=Fd2C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug__7_15_34_25_2005_372)----