Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:39:08 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: beemern@ksu.edu Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux/freebsd kernel differences Message-ID: <20030422173908.GA64310@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33L.0304220911360.17156-100000@unix2.cc.ksu.edu> References: <Pine.GSO.4.33L.0304220911360.17156-100000@unix2.cc.ksu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:15:47AM -0500, beemern@ksu.edu wrote: >=20 > theres an argument here in our office about linux vs. freebsd >=20 > we're building a new nfs server for our entire dept, and i suggested using > fbsd, however, an opponent put forth linux and said that: Linux NFS support is really crappy. It's possible this might have changed recently, but versions I have used do not support NFSv3 or TCP mounts. Even if this has changed recently, it can hardly be considered mature, proven code. I have also had terrible problems with various RPC servers crashing or becoming unresponsive after a period of use, requiring frustrating admin intervention on the server. For your sanity and the sake of your users, just don't do it :) Kris --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+pX48Wry0BWjoQKURApXiAKDh5KfgZXQSwrCwVBYmKERJdFjm8gCgoOPP 3qG4iKEWaNggT1BBcKJk7e0= =uryI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030422173908.GA64310>