From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 10:21:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2065716A4CE for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:21:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from totem.fix.no (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C7743D64 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:21:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from espent@totem.fix.no) Received: from localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by totem.fix.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39085F3825; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:21:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from totem.fix.no ([80.91.36.20]) by localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26307-02-3; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:21:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by totem.fix.no (Postfix, from userid 1032) id 7FC8F5F380D; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:21:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:21:45 +0100 From: Espen Tagestad To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20041201102145.GA26414@totem.fix.no> References: <20041130085340.GA76915@totem.fix.no> <20041130180546.BD4CC5D04@ptavv.es.net> <20041201100558.GA26164@totem.fix.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041201100558.GA26164@totem.fix.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI differences 4.10 - 5.3, laptop problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:21:53 -0000 On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:05:58AM +0100, Espen Tagestad wrote: > No, this didn't have any effect on the coolers. If I set > hw.p4tcc.cpuperf_performance to 13 (the lowest available) > hw.p4tcc.cpuperf follows. But I can't see wether it's slowing down the > processor, and it certainly don't slow down the coolers :( Ouch! It DID slow down the processor, I didn't see it before now! Ok, then I'll guess the processor decreases it's energy consumption, but the coolers are still running at full speed. regards, Espen