From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 16:49:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D242107FBF8 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241098E457 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id r83so5952884vsc.4 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 09:49:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T1/wyGI04FossgIOhHC9dskwoIqa6mGWsQcW+wGF1CE=; b=o3tZzu3e4GD6ACl0iwJQ/iis2ufWXZPfHisf21OL7v0c/noEXiHlMaCJI2o+14FDJT W8xcTct54yi9sAot0XW1+a9DPsc6mRFVKbFlzJDQgTVMbB0TJFN35Mv3vPP2AhUSh5bZ DCpK5piIjfaJ6/l3kxEaCDyyhFWLWysnHFgdZN/Jft3OtBb2tM8c3Gf711397hSCMMok y0Do/iWbbqsKggQGFtM+WPPoahZbUtNw66rodDQJut8aftgiyBousGqe4gUlsV56oQ27 V0yUJO20aAF4dGJs4ScKtgAs+quxIX3fFPt8cwl7IJHeUt4kGQOuhcUtn1lEv5JBslEk 7xGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T1/wyGI04FossgIOhHC9dskwoIqa6mGWsQcW+wGF1CE=; b=mxOeVZfPPJCXYa35GmhtqQh+xxdSqRQ/kzZ0HnYraJISZvfrQvIn7JsnFCNTcivBPw yHXoLf/jwwD+/3N6Y8X4j8mS4XJ7wcd1tP9FoNzuHKmE8mS7CoLfOYLoOyk22EJ/RFMS Arb9QOMRR9j+4Mb6T6wY4wwTh6kSif6na1QzZ1XC6zsnsBWXl9f4ZXj5Knbwq8wrFKOd gHcuVBB2jkuf36HhtHSq824tOr3Dce1BKZde3YpJAXXgMQZdJTLGgL84Ak7I/QqWmcRW a5io7l2F6zOWgm9TZrOxylqSSvNDhCkYBQJE7/GYoO3etGD4A+YzsYgnTklPJlOKBPVm a7mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKXrZExTIdoLzDGvpIg4QKJXlGLnIOhrhwq4fQMONpxNJ48xMC6 zhitGgtqEFtVG22tzVCb8jJ6QPQTz1JT8tSG88pUbd4q X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fknzryi818qkyu9Hg1bvKKkD6/GA0pzuequVTGV4co9sxyg2wsrNcKmB6lXKyBxo3G6ES91vEV8+L2fpqM5F0= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2704:: with SMTP id n4mr1068157vsn.209.1540486139566; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 09:48:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201810251102.w9PB2pXv034094@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <3ec80228-d9fc-a411-c8c5-9bc9cc6e0856@bluestop.org> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:48:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 12-BETA1 contains warning about non-PNP ISA device To: rebecca@bluestop.org Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , FreeBSD Current , Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:49:00 -0000 On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:46 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:26 AM Rebecca Cran > wrote: > >> On 10/25/18 10:20 AM, Rebecca Cran wrote: >> >> > >> > uart0 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=0 at handle=\_SB_.FUR0 >> > uart1 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=1 at handle=\_SB_.FUR1 >> > uart2 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=2 at handle=\_SB_.FUR2 >> > uart3 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=3 at handle=\_SB_.FUR3 >> >> >> Also, in case it's useful - the output of "devinfo -v | grep -i uart": >> >> >> uart0 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=0 at handle=\_SB_.FUR0 >> unknown pnpinfo _HID=UTK0001A _UID=0 at handle=\_SB_.FUR0.UART >> (disabled) >> uart1 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=1 at handle=\_SB_.FUR1 >> unknown pnpinfo _HID=UTK0001B _UID=1 at handle=\_SB_.FUR1.UART >> (disabled) >> uart2 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=2 at handle=\_SB_.FUR2 >> uart3 pnpinfo _HID=AMDI0020 _UID=3 at handle=\_SB_.FUR3 >> > > Oh! that looks mostly right, though IIRC the higher UIDs might be > something else. Harmless enough for now, though. > > I also think you might be able to test if we can remove a special case > kludge we have for the AMDI0020 device since it looks like it has STA_ that > might be sane now. Are you up for that? > Oh, wait, no. Other aml dumps show it's still lame :( Warner